 History & Society
 Science & Tech
 Biographies
 Animals & Nature
 Geography & Travel
 Arts & Culture
 Games & Quizzes
 On This Day
 One Good Fact
 New Articles
 Lifestyles & Social Issues
 Philosophy & Religion
 Politics, Law & Government
 World History
 Health & Medicine
 Browse Biographies
 Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates
 Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates
 Environment
 Fossils & Geologic Time
 Entertainment & Pop Culture
 Sports & Recreation
 Visual Arts
 Demystified
 Image Galleries
 Infographics
 Top Questions
 Britannica Kids
 Saving Earth
 Space Next 50
 Student Center
 Introduction & Top Questions
 Ray theories in the ancient world
 Early particle and wave theories
 Reflection and refraction
 Total internal reflection
 Characteristics of waves
Young’s doubleslit experiment
 Thinfilm interference
 Diffraction
 Poisson’s spot
 Circular apertures and image resolution
 Atmospheric diffraction effects
 Doppler effect
 Electric and magnetic fields
 Maxwell’s equations
 Electromagnetic waves
 The electromagnetic spectrum
 Sources of electromagnetic waves
 Early measurements
 The MichelsonMorley experiment
 Fundamental constant of nature
 Transverse waves
 Unpolarized light
 Sources of polarized light
 Radiation pressure
 Interactions of light with matter
 Nonlinear interactions
 Blackbody radiation
 Waveparticle duality
 Quantum optics
 Spontaneous emission
 Stimulated emission
 Quantum electrodynamics
 Why is light important for life on Earth?
Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.
 Chemistry LibreTexts  The Nature of Light
 NeoK12  Educational Videos and Games for School Kids  Light and Optics
 University of Colorado Boulder  Department of Physics  Light and Optics
 Berkleley Lab Environment, Health & Safety  Light and Infrared Radiation
 Khan Academy  Introduction to light
 light  Children's Encyclopedia (Ages 811)
 light  Student Encyclopedia (Ages 11 and up)
 Table Of Contents
The observation of interference effects definitively indicates the presence of overlapping waves. Thomas Young postulated that light is a wave and is subject to the superposition principle; his great experimental achievement was to demonstrate the constructive and destructive interference of light (c. 1801). In a modern version of Young’s experiment, differing in its essentials only in the source of light, a laser equally illuminates two parallel slits in an otherwise opaque surface. The light passing through the two slits is observed on a distant screen. When the widths of the slits are significantly greater than the wavelength of the light, the rules of geometrical optics hold—the light casts two shadows, and there are two illuminated regions on the screen. However, as the slits are narrowed in width, the light diffracts into the geometrical shadow, and the light waves overlap on the screen. (Diffraction is itself caused by the wave nature of light, being another example of an interference effect—it is discussed in more detail below.)
Recent News
The superposition principle determines the resulting intensity pattern on the illuminated screen. Constructive interference occurs whenever the difference in paths from the two slits to a point on the screen equals an integral number of wavelengths (0, λ, 2λ,…). This path difference guarantees that crests from the two waves arrive simultaneously. Destructive interference arises from path differences that equal a halfintegral number of wavelengths (λ/2, 3λ/2,…). Young used geometrical arguments to show that the superposition of the two waves results in a series of equally spaced bands, or fringes, of high intensity, corresponding to regions of constructive interference, separated by dark regions of complete destructive interference.
An important parameter in the doubleslit geometry is the ratio of the wavelength of the light λ to the spacing of the slits d . If λ/ d is much smaller than 1, the spacing between consecutive interference fringes will be small, and the interference effects may not be observable. Using narrowly separated slits, Young was able to separate the interference fringes. In this way he determined the wavelengths of the colours of visible light. The very short wavelengths of visible light explain why interference effects are observed only in special circumstances—the spacing between the sources of the interfering light waves must be very small to separate regions of constructive and destructive interference.
Observing interference effects is challenging because of two other difficulties. Most light sources emit a continuous range of wavelengths, which result in many overlapping interference patterns, each with a different fringe spacing. The multiple interference patterns wash out the most pronounced interference effects, such as the regions of complete darkness. Second, for an interference pattern to be observable over any extended period of time, the two sources of light must be coherent with respect to each other. This means that the light sources must maintain a constant phase relationship. For example, two harmonic waves of the same frequency always have a fixed phase relationship at every point in space, being either in phase, out of phase, or in some intermediate relationship. However, most light sources do not emit true harmonic waves; instead, they emit waves that undergo random phase changes millions of times per second. Such light is called incoherent . Interference still occurs when light waves from two incoherent sources overlap in space, but the interference pattern fluctuates randomly as the phases of the waves shift randomly. Detectors of light, including the eye, cannot register the quickly shifting interference patterns, and only a timeaveraged intensity is observed. Laser light is approximately monochromatic (consisting of a single wavelength) and is highly coherent; it is thus an ideal source for revealing interference effects.
After 1802, Young’s measurements of the wavelengths of visible light could be combined with the relatively crude determinations of the speed of light available at the time in order to calculate the approximate frequencies of light. For example, the frequency of green light is about 6 × 10 14 Hz ( hertz , or cycles per second). This frequency is many orders of magnitude larger than the frequencies of common mechanical waves. For comparison, humans can hear sound waves with frequencies up to about 2 × 10 4 Hz. Exactly what was oscillating at such a high rate remained a mystery for another 60 years.
If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.
If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.
To log in and use all the features of Khan Academy, please enable JavaScript in your browser.
AP®︎/College Physics 2
Course: ap®︎/college physics 2 > unit 6.
 Constructive and destructive interference
Young's double slit introduction
 Young's double slit equation
 Young's double slit problem solving
 Calculate path difference in YDSE
 Diffraction grating
 Single slit interference
 More on single slit interference
 Thin film interference (part 1)
 Thin film interference (part 2)
Want to join the conversation?
 Upvote Button navigates to signup page
 Downvote Button navigates to signup page
 Flag Button navigates to signup page
Video transcript
Wave Optics
Young’s double slit experiment, learning objectives.
By the end of this section, you will be able to:
 Explain the phenomena of interference.
 Define constructive interference for a double slit and destructive interference for a double slit.
Although Christiaan Huygens thought that light was a wave, Isaac Newton did not. Newton felt that there were other explanations for color, and for the interference and diffraction effects that were observable at the time. Owing to Newton’s tremendous stature, his view generally prevailed. The fact that Huygens’s principle worked was not considered evidence that was direct enough to prove that light is a wave. The acceptance of the wave character of light came many years later when, in 1801, the English physicist and physician Thomas Young (1773–1829) did his nowclassic double slit experiment (see Figure 1).
Figure 1. Young’s double slit experiment. Here purewavelength light sent through a pair of vertical slits is diffracted into a pattern on the screen of numerous vertical lines spread out horizontally. Without diffraction and interference, the light would simply make two lines on the screen.
Why do we not ordinarily observe wave behavior for light, such as observed in Young’s double slit experiment? First, light must interact with something small, such as the closely spaced slits used by Young, to show pronounced wave effects. Furthermore, Young first passed light from a single source (the Sun) through a single slit to make the light somewhat coherent. By coherent , we mean waves are in phase or have a definite phase relationship. Incoherent means the waves have random phase relationships. Why did Young then pass the light through a double slit? The answer to this question is that two slits provide two coherent light sources that then interfere constructively or destructively. Young used sunlight, where each wavelength forms its own pattern, making the effect more difficult to see. We illustrate the double slit experiment with monochromatic (single λ ) light to clarify the effect. Figure 2 shows the pure constructive and destructive interference of two waves having the same wavelength and amplitude.
Figure 2. The amplitudes of waves add. (a) Pure constructive interference is obtained when identical waves are in phase. (b) Pure destructive interference occurs when identical waves are exactly out of phase, or shifted by half a wavelength.
When light passes through narrow slits, it is diffracted into semicircular waves, as shown in Figure 3a. Pure constructive interference occurs where the waves are crest to crest or trough to trough. Pure destructive interference occurs where they are crest to trough. The light must fall on a screen and be scattered into our eyes for us to see the pattern. An analogous pattern for water waves is shown in Figure 3b. Note that regions of constructive and destructive interference move out from the slits at welldefined angles to the original beam. These angles depend on wavelength and the distance between the slits, as we shall see below.
Figure 3. Double slits produce two coherent sources of waves that interfere. (a) Light spreads out (diffracts) from each slit, because the slits are narrow. These waves overlap and interfere constructively (bright lines) and destructively (dark regions). We can only see this if the light falls onto a screen and is scattered into our eyes. (b) Double slit interference pattern for water waves are nearly identical to that for light. Wave action is greatest in regions of constructive interference and least in regions of destructive interference. (c) When light that has passed through double slits falls on a screen, we see a pattern such as this. (credit: PASCO)
To understand the double slit interference pattern, we consider how two waves travel from the slits to the screen, as illustrated in Figure 4. Each slit is a different distance from a given point on the screen. Thus different numbers of wavelengths fit into each path. Waves start out from the slits in phase (crest to crest), but they may end up out of phase (crest to trough) at the screen if the paths differ in length by half a wavelength, interfering destructively as shown in Figure 4a. If the paths differ by a whole wavelength, then the waves arrive in phase (crest to crest) at the screen, interfering constructively as shown in Figure 4b. More generally, if the paths taken by the two waves differ by any halfintegral number of wavelengths [(1/2) λ , (3/2) λ , (5/2) λ , etc.], then destructive interference occurs. Similarly, if the paths taken by the two waves differ by any integral number of wavelengths ( λ , 2 λ , 3 λ , etc.), then constructive interference occurs.
Figure 4. Waves follow different paths from the slits to a common point on a screen. (a) Destructive interference occurs here, because one path is a half wavelength longer than the other. The waves start in phase but arrive out of phase. (b) Constructive interference occurs here because one path is a whole wavelength longer than the other. The waves start out and arrive in phase.
TakeHome Experiment: Using Fingers as Slits
Look at a light, such as a street lamp or incandescent bulb, through the narrow gap between two fingers held close together. What type of pattern do you see? How does it change when you allow the fingers to move a little farther apart? Is it more distinct for a monochromatic source, such as the yellow light from a sodium vapor lamp, than for an incandescent bulb?
Figure 5. The paths from each slit to a common point on the screen differ by an amount dsinθ, assuming the distance to the screen is much greater than the distance between slits (not to scale here).
Figure 5 shows how to determine the path length difference for waves traveling from two slits to a common point on a screen. If the screen is a large distance away compared with the distance between the slits, then the angle θ between the path and a line from the slits to the screen (see the figure) is nearly the same for each path. The difference between the paths is shown in the figure; simple trigonometry shows it to be d sin θ , where d is the distance between the slits. To obtain constructive interference for a double slit , the path length difference must be an integral multiple of the wavelength, or d sin θ = mλ, for m = 0, 1, −1, 2, −2, . . . (constructive).
Similarly, to obtain destructive interference for a double slit , the path length difference must be a halfintegral multiple of the wavelength, or
[latex]d\sin\theta=\left(m+\frac{1}{2}\right)\lambda\text{, for }m=0,1,1,2,2,\dots\text{ (destructive)}\\[/latex],
where λ is the wavelength of the light, d is the distance between slits, and θ is the angle from the original direction of the beam as discussed above. We call m the order of the interference. For example, m = 4 is fourthorder interference.
The equations for double slit interference imply that a series of bright and dark lines are formed. For vertical slits, the light spreads out horizontally on either side of the incident beam into a pattern called interference fringes, illustrated in Figure 6. The intensity of the bright fringes falls off on either side, being brightest at the center. The closer the slits are, the more is the spreading of the bright fringes. We can see this by examining the equation d sin θ = mλ, for m = 0, 1, −1, 2, −2, . . . .
For fixed λ and m , the smaller d is, the larger θ must be, since [latex]\sin\theta=\frac{m\lambda}{d}\\[/latex]. This is consistent with our contention that wave effects are most noticeable when the object the wave encounters (here, slits a distance d apart) is small. Small d gives large θ , hence a large effect.
Figure 6. The interference pattern for a double slit has an intensity that falls off with angle. The photograph shows multiple bright and dark lines, or fringes, formed by light passing through a double slit.
Example 1. Finding a Wavelength from an Interference Pattern
Suppose you pass light from a HeNe laser through two slits separated by 0.0100 mm and find that the third bright line on a screen is formed at an angle of 10.95º relative to the incident beam. What is the wavelength of the light?
The third bright line is due to thirdorder constructive interference, which means that m = 3. We are given d = 0.0100 mm and θ = 10.95º. The wavelength can thus be found using the equation d sin θ = mλ for constructive interference.
The equation is d sin θ = mλ . Solving for the wavelength λ gives [latex]\lambda=\frac{d\sin\theta}{m}\\[/latex].
Substituting known values yields
[latex]\begin{array}{lll}\lambda&=&\frac{\left(0.0100\text{ nm}\right)\left(\sin10.95^{\circ}\right)}{3}\\\text{ }&=&6.33\times10^{4}\text{ nm}=633\text{ nm}\end{array}\\[/latex]
To three digits, this is the wavelength of light emitted by the common HeNe laser. Not by coincidence, this red color is similar to that emitted by neon lights. More important, however, is the fact that interference patterns can be used to measure wavelength. Young did this for visible wavelengths. This analytical technique is still widely used to measure electromagnetic spectra. For a given order, the angle for constructive interference increases with λ , so that spectra (measurements of intensity versus wavelength) can be obtained.
Example 2. Calculating Highest Order Possible
Interference patterns do not have an infinite number of lines, since there is a limit to how big m can be. What is the highestorder constructive interference possible with the system described in the preceding example?
Strategy and Concept
The equation d sin θ = mλ ( for m = 0, 1, −1, 2, −2, . . . ) describes constructive interference. For fixed values of d and λ , the larger m is, the larger sin θ is. However, the maximum value that sin θ can have is 1, for an angle of 90º. (Larger angles imply that light goes backward and does not reach the screen at all.) Let us find which m corresponds to this maximum diffraction angle.
Solving the equation d sin θ = mλ for m gives [latex]\lambda=\frac{d\sin\theta}{m}\\[/latex].
Taking sin θ = 1 and substituting the values of d and λ from the preceding example gives
[latex]\displaystyle{m}=\frac{\left(0.0100\text{ mm}\right)\left(1\right)}{633\text{ nm}}\approx15.8\\[/latex]
Therefore, the largest integer m can be is 15, or m = 15.
The number of fringes depends on the wavelength and slit separation. The number of fringes will be very large for large slit separations. However, if the slit separation becomes much greater than the wavelength, the intensity of the interference pattern changes so that the screen has two bright lines cast by the slits, as expected when light behaves like a ray. We also note that the fringes get fainter further away from the center. Consequently, not all 15 fringes may be observable.
Section Summary
 Young’s double slit experiment gave definitive proof of the wave character of light.
 An interference pattern is obtained by the superposition of light from two slits.
 There is constructive interference when d sin θ = mλ ( for m = 0, 1, −1, 2, −2, . . . ), where d is the distance between the slits, θ is the angle relative to the incident direction, and m is the order of the interference.
 There is destructive interference when d sin θ = mλ ( for m = 0, 1, −1, 2, −2, . . . ).
Conceptual Questions
 Young’s double slit experiment breaks a single light beam into two sources. Would the same pattern be obtained for two independent sources of light, such as the headlights of a distant car? Explain.
 Suppose you use the same double slit to perform Young’s double slit experiment in air and then repeat the experiment in water. Do the angles to the same parts of the interference pattern get larger or smaller? Does the color of the light change? Explain.
 Is it possible to create a situation in which there is only destructive interference? Explain.
 Figure 7 shows the central part of the interference pattern for a pure wavelength of red light projected onto a double slit. The pattern is actually a combination of single slit and double slit interference. Note that the bright spots are evenly spaced. Is this a double slit or single slit characteristic? Note that some of the bright spots are dim on either side of the center. Is this a single slit or double slit characteristic? Which is smaller, the slit width or the separation between slits? Explain your responses.
Figure 7. This double slit interference pattern also shows signs of single slit interference. (credit: PASCO)
Problems & Exercises
 At what angle is the firstorder maximum for 450nm wavelength blue light falling on double slits separated by 0.0500 mm?
 Calculate the angle for the thirdorder maximum of 580nm wavelength yellow light falling on double slits separated by 0.100 mm.
 What is the separation between two slits for which 610nm orange light has its first maximum at an angle of 30.0º?
 Find the distance between two slits that produces the first minimum for 410nm violet light at an angle of 45.0º.
 Calculate the wavelength of light that has its third minimum at an angle of 30.0º when falling on double slits separated by 3.00 μm.
 What is the wavelength of light falling on double slits separated by 2.00 μm if the thirdorder maximum is at an angle of 60.0º?
 At what angle is the fourthorder maximum for the situation in Question 1?
 What is the highestorder maximum for 400nm light falling on double slits separated by 25.0 μm?
 Find the largest wavelength of light falling on double slits separated by 1.20 μm for which there is a firstorder maximum. Is this in the visible part of the spectrum?
 What is the smallest separation between two slits that will produce a secondorder maximum for 720nm red light?
 (a) What is the smallest separation between two slits that will produce a secondorder maximum for any visible light? (b) For all visible light?
 (a) If the firstorder maximum for purewavelength light falling on a double slit is at an angle of 10.0º, at what angle is the secondorder maximum? (b) What is the angle of the first minimum? (c) What is the highestorder maximum possible here?
Figure 8. The distance between adjacent fringes is [latex]\Delta{y}=\frac{x\lambda}{d}\\[/latex], assuming the slit separation d is large compared with λ .
 Using the result of the problem above, calculate the distance between fringes for 633nm light falling on double slits separated by 0.0800 mm, located 3.00 m from a screen as in Figure 8.
 Using the result of the problem two problems prior, find the wavelength of light that produces fringes 7.50 mm apart on a screen 2.00 m from double slits separated by 0.120 mm (see Figure 8).
coherent: waves are in phase or have a definite phase relationship
constructive interference for a double slit: the path length difference must be an integral multiple of the wavelength
destructive interference for a double slit: the path length difference must be a halfintegral multiple of the wavelength
incoherent: waves have random phase relationships
order: the integer m used in the equations for constructive and destructive interference for a double slit
Selected Solutions to Problems & Exercises
3. 1.22 × 10 −6 m
9. 1200 nm (not visible)
11. (a) 760 nm; (b) 1520 nm
13. For small angles sin θ − tan θ ≈ θ (in radians).
For two adjacent fringes we have, d sin θ m = mλ and d sin θ m + 1 = ( m + 1) λ
Subtracting these equations gives
[latex]\begin{array}{}d\left(\sin{\theta }_{\text{m}+1}\sin{\theta }_{\text{m}}\right)=\left[\left(m+1\right)m\right]\lambda \\ d\left({\theta }_{\text{m}+1}{\theta }_{\text{m}}\right)=\lambda \\ \text{tan}{\theta }_{\text{m}}=\frac{{y}_{\text{m}}}{x}\approx {\theta }_{\text{m}}\Rightarrow d\left(\frac{{y}_{\text{m}+1}}{x}\frac{{y}_{\text{m}}}{x}\right)=\lambda \\ d\frac{\Delta y}{x}=\lambda \Rightarrow \Delta y=\frac{\mathrm{x\lambda }}{d}\end{array}\\[/latex]
 College Physics. Authored by : OpenStax College. Located at : http://cnx.org/contents/031da8d3b525429c80cf6c8ed997733a/College_Physics . License : CC BY: Attribution . License Terms : Located at License
3.1 Young's DoubleSlit Interference
Learning objectives.
By the end of this section, you will be able to:
 Explain the phenomenon of interference
 Define constructive and destructive interference for a double slit
The Dutch physicist Christiaan Huygens (1629–1695) thought that light was a wave, but Isaac Newton did not. Newton thought that there were other explanations for color, and for the interference and diffraction effects that were observable at the time. Owing to Newton’s tremendous reputation, his view generally prevailed; the fact that Huygens’s principle worked was not considered direct evidence proving that light is a wave. The acceptance of the wave character of light came many years later in 1801, when the English physicist and physician Thomas Young (1773–1829) demonstrated optical interference with his nowclassic doubleslit experiment.
If there were not one but two sources of waves, the waves could be made to interfere, as in the case of waves on water ( Figure 3.2 ). If light is an electromagnetic wave, it must therefore exhibit interference effects under appropriate circumstances. In Young’s experiment, sunlight was passed through a pinhole on a board. The emerging beam fell on two pinholes on a second board. The light emanating from the two pinholes then fell on a screen where a pattern of bright and dark spots was observed. This pattern, called fringes, can only be explained through interference, a wave phenomenon.
We can analyze doubleslit interference with the help of Figure 3.3 , which depicts an apparatus analogous to Young’s. Light from a monochromatic source falls on a slit S 0 S 0 . The light emanating from S 0 S 0 is incident on two other slits S 1 S 1 and S 2 S 2 that are equidistant from S 0 S 0 . A pattern of interference fringes on the screen is then produced by the light emanating from S 1 S 1 and S 2 S 2 . All slits are assumed to be so narrow that they can be considered secondary point sources for Huygens’ wavelets ( The Nature of Light ). Slits S 1 S 1 and S 2 S 2 are a distance d apart ( d ≤ 1 mm d ≤ 1 mm ), and the distance between the screen and the slits is D ( ≈ 1 m ) D ( ≈ 1 m ) , which is much greater than d.
Since S 0 S 0 is assumed to be a point source of monochromatic light, the secondary Huygens wavelets leaving S 1 S 1 and S 2 S 2 always maintain a constant phase difference (zero in this case because S 1 S 1 and S 2 S 2 are equidistant from S 0 S 0 ) and have the same frequency. The sources S 1 S 1 and S 2 S 2 are then said to be coherent. By coherent waves , we mean the waves are in phase or have a definite phase relationship. The term incoherent means the waves have random phase relationships, which would be the case if S 1 S 1 and S 2 S 2 were illuminated by two independent light sources, rather than a single source S 0 S 0 . Two independent light sources (which may be two separate areas within the same lamp or the Sun) would generally not emit their light in unison, that is, not coherently. Also, because S 1 S 1 and S 2 S 2 are the same distance from S 0 S 0 , the amplitudes of the two Huygens wavelets are equal.
Young used sunlight, where each wavelength forms its own pattern, making the effect more difficult to see. In the following discussion, we illustrate the doubleslit experiment with monochromatic light (single λ λ ) to clarify the effect. Figure 3.4 shows the pure constructive and destructive interference of two waves having the same wavelength and amplitude.
When light passes through narrow slits, the slits act as sources of coherent waves and light spreads out as semicircular waves, as shown in Figure 3.5 (a). Pure constructive interference occurs where the waves are crest to crest or trough to trough. Pure destructive interference occurs where they are crest to trough. The light must fall on a screen and be scattered into our eyes for us to see the pattern. An analogous pattern for water waves is shown in Figure 3.2 . Note that regions of constructive and destructive interference move out from the slits at welldefined angles to the original beam. These angles depend on wavelength and the distance between the slits, as we shall see below.
To understand the doubleslit interference pattern, consider how two waves travel from the slits to the screen ( Figure 3.6 ). Each slit is a different distance from a given point on the screen. Thus, different numbers of wavelengths fit into each path. Waves start out from the slits in phase (crest to crest), but they may end up out of phase (crest to trough) at the screen if the paths differ in length by half a wavelength, interfering destructively. If the paths differ by a whole wavelength, then the waves arrive in phase (crest to crest) at the screen, interfering constructively. More generally, if the path length difference Δ l Δ l between the two waves is any halfintegral number of wavelengths [(1 / 2) λ λ , (3 / 2) λ λ , (5 / 2) λ λ , etc.], then destructive interference occurs. Similarly, if the path length difference is any integral number of wavelengths ( λ λ , 2 λ λ , 3 λ λ , etc.), then constructive interference occurs. These conditions can be expressed as equations:
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This book may not be used in the training of large language models or otherwise be ingested into large language models or generative AI offerings without OpenStax's permission.
Want to cite, share, or modify this book? This book uses the Creative Commons Attribution License and you must attribute OpenStax.
Access for free at https://openstax.org/books/universityphysicsvolume3/pages/1introduction
 Authors: Samuel J. Ling, Jeff Sanny, William Moebs
 Publisher/website: OpenStax
 Book title: University Physics Volume 3
 Publication date: Sep 29, 2016
 Location: Houston, Texas
 Book URL: https://openstax.org/books/universityphysicsvolume3/pages/1introduction
 Section URL: https://openstax.org/books/universityphysicsvolume3/pages/31youngsdoubleslitinterference
© Jan 19, 2024 OpenStax. Textbook content produced by OpenStax is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License . The OpenStax name, OpenStax logo, OpenStax book covers, OpenStax CNX name, and OpenStax CNX logo are not subject to the Creative Commons license and may not be reproduced without the prior and express written consent of Rice University.
Wolfram Demonstrations Project
Interference of waves from double slit (young's experiment).
angle of diffracted ray (0 to π/2)  
.5 
.1913 
5. 
 Open in Cloud
 Download to Desktop
 Copy Resource Object
Requires a Wolfram Notebook System
Interact on desktop, mobile and cloud with the free Wolfram Player or other Wolfram Language products .
Do not show again
Contributed by: Fernand Brunschwig (March 2011) Open content licensed under CC BYNCSA
Snapshot 1: The red and blue wave crests fall on top of each other and thus reinforce each other, which would result in a bright spot on the screen at this angle. The blue waves are one full wavelength "ahead of" the red waves.
Snapshot 2: The wavelength is smaller than in Snapshot 1. As a result, the angle at which the red and blue wave crests fall on top of each other must also be smaller. As in Snapshot 1, this would result in a bright spot on the screen at this angle. The blue waves are one full wavelength "ahead of" the red waves.
Snapshot 3: The wavelength and slit width are the same as in Snapshot 2. However, the angle is much larger and the wave crests are still falling on top of each other. This is the result of the fact that the blue waves are now two full wavelengths "ahead of" the blue waves.
Inspired by "The Wave Theory," Chap. 6 in R. Karplus, Introductory Physics: A Model Approach , 2nd ed., Buzzards Bay, MA: Captain's Engineering Services, Inc., 2003.
Related Links
 Double Slit Interference ( Wolfram ScienceWorld )
 Young, Thomas (17731829) ( Wolfram ScienceWorld )
 Wave Interference
Permanent Citation
Fernand Brunschwig "Interference of Waves from Double Slit (Young's Experiment)" http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/InterferenceOfWavesFromDoubleSlitYoungsExperiment/ Wolfram Demonstrations Project Published: March 7 2011
Share Demonstration
Take advantage of the Wolfram Notebook Emebedder for the recommended user experience.
Related Topics
 High School Physics
Feedback (field required)  
Email (field required)  Name  
Occupation  Organization  
and .
(separate page)Young, a contemporary of Newton, performed his celebrated experiment with light, to demonstrate its wave nature. Here, we'll look first at a similar experiment using water waves, for which the displacements are visible. Two pencils attached to a frame are being sinusoidally vibrated in the vertical direction. They touch the water and create waves that spread out radially. 
In the upper views, on the axis of symmetry, we can see constructive interference: along this line, the combined waves from the two sources has maximum amplitude. In the left images, this is marked by a red line on both the upper and lower views. This is called constructive interference and it creates an antinode in the wave pattern.
A little to the left of that line, we can see a line where the wave combination hardly disturbs the water at all: destructive interference or a node. This is marked by a blue line on both views. Along this blue line, the distance from the two sources differs by half a wavelength, hence the destructive interference: the waves arrive there half a cycle out of phase.
To the left of both lines, there is another line of antinode, again marked with a red line. Along this line, the distance from the two sources differs by one wavelength. The pattern of nodal and antinodal lines continues all the way around the two sources.
The two different views are of the same apparatus, taken from different angles. In the upper shot, we see the waves on the water surface. On the lower, we see the distribution of light intensity due to the refaction of light by the waves. In the experiment above, the clip is cycling over seven frames. For this frequency, the lower view is not very clear. For that reason, we show below a slightly higher frequency.
In the clip at right, the frequency is about 15% higher. This time the lower view is clear, but the upper view is less clear. By the way: for waves of this size, both the surface tension of water and gravity contribute to the restoring force, so the wave speed is not constant, but is a complicated function of the wavelength, so wavelength and period are not proportional.
Young's experiment with laser light
We can see an analogy with the water experiment above: on the axis of symmetry, we see a bright spot, where light from the two sources interferes constructively. A little to the left, a node (black in the pattern). Then an antinode (bright red) where the distance from the two slits must differ by one wavelength. Let's look at the geometry in another diagram.
Young's experiment: the geometry
It's interesting to note that the photographed pattern doesn't 'look like' the intensity graph plotted beside it. We return to this below.
Comparison: Young's experiment with water waves and with light
So both water waves and light exhibit interference – a property of waves. But does this explain how light casts shadows? Go to this page about Shadows, particles and waves . This link will return you to the multimedia tutorial The Nature of Light .
Pathlengths and interference If we look down on a Young's experiment from above, what do we see? From the two sources (two slits for light) wave fronts spread out symmetrically in all directions. The animation shows this for the water waves, which radiate in all directions. For light, the radiation spreads over only a small angle, as we'll see later. In the animation above, grey circles are wavefronts. The pink lines show loci of constructive interference. The black lines show points where the path difference from the two slits differs by an integral number of wavelengths. Grey straight lines are loci of destructive interference. Small angle approximationFor Young's experiment with light, the distance L to the screen is typically very much greater the distance between slits, so lines drawn from a point on the screen to each of the slits are almost parallel, an approximation we'll use next. (Further, the interference pattern is usually spread over a very small angle, so the small angle approximation is usually appropriate.) Finding the angular position of maxima and minimaThe distance between the slits is d . Consider paths from the two slits at angle θ . From the (almost) right angle triangle shown, the difference in path length to the screen from the two slits is Divide this by the wavelength to get the number of cycles out of phase, and it follows that the phase difference at the screen, in radians, is For de structive interference , the minima in brightness, the phase difference should be π, 3π etc, i.e. Phasors: calculating the interference intensity as a function of angle

IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Thomas Young's sketch of interference based on observations of water waves. In 1801, Young presented a famous paper to the Royal Society entitled "On the Theory of Light and Colours" which describes various interference phenomena. In 1803, he described his famous interference experiment.
Young's experiment, classical investigation into the nature of light, an investigation that provided the basic element in the development of the wave theory and was first performed by the English physicist and physician Thomas Young in 1801. In this experiment, Young identified the phenomenon called interference.Observing that when light from a single source is split into two beams, and the ...
Summary. Young's double slit experiment gave definitive proof of the wave character of light. An interference pattern is obtained by the superposition of light from two slits. There is constructive interference when dsinθ = mλ(form = 0, 1, − 2, 2, − 2,...), where d is the distance between the slits, θ is the angle relative to the ...
Light  Wave, Interference, Diffraction: The observation of interference effects definitively indicates the presence of overlapping waves. Thomas Young postulated that light is a wave and is subject to the superposition principle; his great experimental achievement was to demonstrate the constructive and destructive interference of light (c. 1801).
Young's double slit introduction. We can see interference in action if we shine laser light through two slits onto a screen. Explore Young's Double Slit experiment, a cornerstone in understanding light as a wave. Discover how light waves spread out, overlap, and create patterns of constructive and destructive interference.
Figure 3.2.2 3.2. 2: The doubleslit interference experiment using monochromatic light and narrow slits. Fringes produced by interfering Huygens wavelets from slits S1 S 1 and S2 S 2 are observed on the screen. Since S0 S 0 is assumed to be a point source of monochromatic light, the secondary Huygens wavelets leaving S1 S 1 and S2 S 2 always ...
Section Summary. Young's double slit experiment gave definitive proof of the wave character of light. An interference pattern is obtained by the superposition of light from two slits. There is constructive interference when d sin θ = mλ ( for m = 0, 1, −1, 2, −2, . . . ), where d is the distance between the slits, θ is the angle ...
In Young's experiment, sunlight was passed through a pinhole on a board. The emerging beam fell on two pinholes on a second board. The light emanating from the two pinholes then fell on a screen where a pattern of bright and dark spots was observed. This pattern, called fringes, can only be explained through interference, a wave phenomenon.
The first atom interferometer was reported in 1991 ( Carnal & Mlynek, 1991 ), in which Young's doubleslit experiment was used to produce interference fringes with a beam of helium atoms with λ ≈ 1 Å. A Na 2 molecular beam with λ = 0.11 Å diffracted by a grating was reported in 1995 ( Chapman et al., 1995 ).
The celebrated experiment of Thomas Young has had a tremendous historical influence by revealing not only the wave character of light, but also by demonstrating the waveparticle duality that was suggested by de Broglie. In addition, the foundations of coherence theory are based on observable quantities that can be measured in a twopinhole setup.
Thomas Young observed interference of light and measured the wavelength of light in this classic experiment performed around 1801. It provided the clinching evidence in Youngs arguments for the wave model for light. This Demonstration shows two light waves of the same wavelength (shown in red and blue for ease of viewing) which have passed through two narrow slits and as a result of diffraction;;
Young's experiment demonstrates interference of waves from two similar sources. It is a classic demonstration of the interference and of the nature of waves. Here we look first at Young's experiment using water waves, where the displacements due to the waves can be seen directly, as at right. Then we analyse Young's experiment using laser light.
The most famous early experiment regarding the nature of light was Young's interference experiment. Background. At the time of Young's experiment, there was uncertainty in the scientific community regarding the nature of light. Young, having worked on sound before turning to work on light, thought that light was a wave. On the other side of the ...
Interference occurs when multiple waves interact with each other and is a change in amplitude caused by several waves meeting. In Young's Doubleslit experiment, a coherent light source goes through 2 small slits to create a dark and white pattern on a wall beyond the slits. Unlike solid objects, two waves can share a point in space.
When Thomas Young (17731829) first demonstrated this phenomenon, it indicated that light consists of waves, as the distribution of brightness can be explained by the alternately additive and subtractive interference of wavefronts. Young's experiment, performed in the early 1800s, played a crucial role in the understanding of the wave theory ...
Javascript version: will play on your device!Flashlets Home Page. Young's Interference Experiment. Instructions: Drag the detector at the plate or the sources to create waves. You can change the values of the wavelength, amplitude, and source to plate distance with the sliders on the left. Fine adjustment of the location of the detector with ...
We report the first observation of interference effects in the light scattered from two trapped atoms. The visibility of the fringes can be explained in the framework of Bragg scattering by a harmonic crystal and simple ``which path'' considerations of the scattered photons. If the light scattered by the atoms is detected in a polarizationsensitive way, then it is possible to selectively ...
The Young's interference experiment was one of the wellknown experiments that shows the wave nature of light. It is the fundamental of several quantum optics experiments nowadays. We reproduce this famous experiment in VirtualLab Fusion, by using a double slit with adjustable slit width and slit distance. With a single point source, we ...
We report experimental studies on the FabryPerot (FP) type polariton modes and their dynamics using a modified Young's doubleslit interference technique. The technique was based on the angleresolved microphotoluminescence spectroscopy and optimized for nanostructure measurements. Using this technique, we directly revealed the parity of the FP type polariton modes from the angledependent ...
For artists, writers, gamemasters, musicians, programmers, philosophers and scientists alike! The creation of new worlds and new universes has long been a key element of speculative fiction, from the fantasy works of Tolkien and Le Guin, to the sciencefiction universes of Delany and Asimov, to the tabletop realm of Gygax and Barker, and beyond.
Cities near Elektrostal. Places of interest. Pavlovskiy Posad Noginsk. Travel guide resource for your visit to Elektrostal. Discover the best of Elektrostal so you can plan your trip right.
What time is it in Elektrostal'? Russia (Moscow Oblast): Current local time in & Next time change in Elektrostal', Time Zone Europe/Moscow (UTC+3). Population: 144,387 People
Leninsky District is an administrative and municipal district, one of the thirtysix in Moscow Oblast, Russia. It is located in the center of the oblast just south of the federal city of Moscow. The area of the district is 202.83 square kilometers. Its administrative center is the town of Vidnoye. Population: 172,171; 145,251; 74,490. The population of Vidnoye accounts for 33.0% of the ...