make it equal python assignment expert

CopyAssignment

We are Python language experts, a community to solve Python problems, we are a 1.2 Million community on Instagram, now here to help with our blogs.

Make it equal in Python

In this blog post, we will see how to make it equal in Python means how to compare and make 2 variables equal to each other.

Code to make it equal in Python

Explanation:

We have declared two articles and then compared them to print the difference that can make both variables equal. We hope this short blog may help you. If you need to ask any questions, let us know in the comments.

Thank you for visiting our website.

• Hyphenate Letters in Python
• Earthquake in Python | Easy Calculation
• Striped Rectangle in Python
• Perpendicular Words in Python
• Free shipping in Python
• Raj has ordered two electronic items Python | Assignment Expert
• Team Points in Python
• Ticket selling in Cricket Stadium using Python | Assignment Expert
• Split the sentence in Python
• String Slicing in JavaScript
• First and Last Digits in Python | Assignment Expert
• List Indexing in Python
• Date Format in Python | Assignment Expert
• New Year Countdown in Python
• Add Two Polynomials in Python
• Sum of even numbers in Python | Assignment Expert
• Evens and Odds in Python
• A Game of Letters in Python
• Sum of non-primes in Python
• Smallest Missing Number in Python
• String Rotation in Python
• Secret Message in Python
• Word Mix in Python
• Single Digit Number in Python
• Shift Numbers in Python | Assignment Expert
• Weekend in Python
• Temperature Conversion in Python
• Special Characters in Python
• Sum of Prime Numbers in the Input in Python

Author: Harry

Search….

Machine Learning

Data Structures and Algorithms(Python)

Python Turtle

Games with Python

All Blogs On-Site

Python Compiler(Interpreter)

Online Java Editor

Online C++ Editor

Online C Editor

All Editors

Services(Freelancing)

Recent Posts

• Most Underrated Database Trick | Life-Saving SQL Command
• Python List Methods
• Top 5 Free HTML Resume Templates in 2024 | With Source Code
• How to See Connected Wi-Fi Passwords in Windows?
• 2023 Merry Christmas using Python Turtle

© Copyright 2019-2024 www.copyassignment.com. All rights reserved. Developed by copyassignment

Python Tutorial

File handling, python modules, python numpy, python pandas, python matplotlib, python scipy, machine learning, python mysql, python mongodb, python reference, module reference, python how to, python examples, python assignment operators.

Assignment operators are used to assign values to variables:

Related Pages

COLOR PICKER

Contact Sales

If you want to use W3Schools services as an educational institution, team or enterprise, send us an e-mail: [email protected]

Report Error

If you want to report an error, or if you want to make a suggestion, send us an e-mail: [email protected]

Top Tutorials

Top references, top examples, get certified.

• Hands-on Python Tutorial »
• 1. Beginning With Python »

1.6. Variables and Assignment ¶

Each set-off line in this section should be tried in the Shell.

Nothing is displayed by the interpreter after this entry, so it is not clear anything happened. Something has happened. This is an assignment statement , with a variable , width , on the left. A variable is a name for a value. An assignment statement associates a variable name on the left of the equal sign with the value of an expression calculated from the right of the equal sign. Enter

Once a variable is assigned a value, the variable can be used in place of that value. The response to the expression width is the same as if its value had been entered.

The interpreter does not print a value after an assignment statement because the value of the expression on the right is not lost. It can be recovered if you like, by entering the variable name and we did above.

Try each of the following lines:

The equal sign is an unfortunate choice of symbol for assignment, since Python’s usage is not the mathematical usage of the equal sign. If the symbol ↤ had appeared on keyboards in the early 1990’s, it would probably have been used for assignment instead of =, emphasizing the asymmetry of assignment. In mathematics an equation is an assertion that both sides of the equal sign are already, in fact, equal . A Python assignment statement forces the variable on the left hand side to become associated with the value of the expression on the right side. The difference from the mathematical usage can be illustrated. Try:

so this is not equivalent in Python to width = 10 . The left hand side must be a variable, to which the assignment is made. Reversed, we get a syntax error . Try

This is, of course, nonsensical as mathematics, but it makes perfectly good sense as an assignment, with the right-hand side calculated first. Can you figure out the value that is now associated with width? Check by entering

In the assignment statement, the expression on the right is evaluated first . At that point width was associated with its original value 10, so width + 5 had the value of 10 + 5 which is 15. That value was then assigned to the variable on the left ( width again) to give it a new value. We will modify the value of variables in a similar way routinely.

Assignment and variables work equally well with strings. Try:

Try entering:

Note the different form of the error message. The earlier errors in these tutorials were syntax errors: errors in translation of the instruction. In this last case the syntax was legal, so the interpreter went on to execute the instruction. Only then did it find the error described. There are no quotes around fred , so the interpreter assumed fred was an identifier, but the name fred was not defined at the time the line was executed.

It is both easy to forget quotes where you need them for a literal string and to mistakenly put them around a variable name that should not have them!

Try in the Shell :

There fred , without the quotes, makes sense.

There are more subtleties to assignment and the idea of a variable being a “name for” a value, but we will worry about them later, in Issues with Mutable Objects . They do not come up if our variables are just numbers and strings.

Autocompletion: A handy short cut. Idle remembers all the variables you have defined at any moment. This is handy when editing. Without pressing Enter, type into the Shell just

Assuming you are following on the earlier variable entries to the Shell, you should see f autocompleted to be

This is particularly useful if you have long identifiers! You can press Alt-/ several times if more than one identifier starts with the initial sequence of characters you typed. If you press Alt-/ again you should see fred . Backspace and edit so you have fi , and then and press Alt-/ again. You should not see fred this time, since it does not start with fi .

1.6.1. Literals and Identifiers ¶

Expressions like 27 or 'hello' are called literals , coming from the fact that they literally mean exactly what they say. They are distinguished from variables, whose value is not directly determined by their name.

The sequence of characters used to form a variable name (and names for other Python entities later) is called an identifier . It identifies a Python variable or other entity.

There are some restrictions on the character sequence that make up an identifier:

The characters must all be letters, digits, or underscores _ , and must start with a letter. In particular, punctuation and blanks are not allowed.

There are some words that are reserved for special use in Python. You may not use these words as your own identifiers. They are easy to recognize in Idle, because they are automatically colored orange. For the curious, you may read the full list:

There are also identifiers that are automatically defined in Python, and that you could redefine, but you probably should not unless you really know what you are doing! When you start the editor, we will see how Idle uses color to help you know what identifies are predefined.

Python is case sensitive: The identifiers last , LAST , and LaSt are all different. Be sure to be consistent. Using the Alt-/ auto-completion shortcut in Idle helps ensure you are consistent.

What is legal is distinct from what is conventional or good practice or recommended. Meaningful names for variables are important for the humans who are looking at programs, understanding them, and revising them. That sometimes means you would like to use a name that is more than one word long, like price at opening , but blanks are illegal! One poor option is just leaving out the blanks, like priceatopening . Then it may be hard to figure out where words split. Two practical options are

• underscore separated: putting underscores (which are legal) in place of the blanks, like price_at_opening .
• using camel-case : omitting spaces and using all lowercase, except capitalizing all words after the first, like priceAtOpening

Use the choice that fits your taste (or the taste or convention of the people you are working with).

Table Of Contents

• 1.6.1. Literals and Identifiers

Previous topic

1.5. Strings, Part I

1.7. Print Function, Part I

• Show Source

Quick search

Enter search terms or a module, class or function name.

• Python Course
• Python Basics
• Interview Questions
• Python Quiz
• Popular Packages
• Python Projects
• Practice Python
• AI With Python
• Learn Python3
• Python Automation
• Python Web Dev
• DSA with Python
• Python OOPs
• Dictionaries

Different Forms of Assignment Statements in Python

We use Python assignment statements to assign objects to names. The target of an assignment statement is written on the left side of the equal sign (=), and the object on the right can be an arbitrary expression that computes an object.

There are some important properties of assignment in Python :-

• Assignment creates object references instead of copying the objects.
• Python creates a variable name the first time when they are assigned a value.
• Names must be assigned before being referenced.
• There are some operations that perform assignments implicitly.

Assignment statement forms :-

1. Basic form:

This form is the most common form.

2. Tuple assignment:

When we code a tuple on the left side of the =, Python pairs objects on the right side with targets on the left by position and assigns them from left to right. Therefore, the values of x and y are 50 and 100 respectively.

3. List assignment:

This works in the same way as the tuple assignment.

4. Sequence assignment:

In recent version of Python, tuple and list assignment have been generalized into instances of what we now call sequence assignment – any sequence of names can be assigned to any sequence of values, and Python assigns the items one at a time by position.

5. Extended Sequence unpacking:

It allows us to be more flexible in how we select portions of a sequence to assign.

Here, p is matched with the first character in the string on the right and q with the rest. The starred name (*q) is assigned a list, which collects all items in the sequence not assigned to other names.

This is especially handy for a common coding pattern such as splitting a sequence and accessing its front and rest part.

6. Multiple- target assignment:

In this form, Python assigns a reference to the same object (the object which is rightmost) to all the target on the left.

7. Augmented assignment :

The augmented assignment is a shorthand assignment that combines an expression and an assignment.

There are several other augmented assignment forms:

Please Login to comment...

Similar reads.

• Python Programs
• python-basics
• Best Twitch Extensions for 2024: Top Tools for Viewers and Streamers
• Discord Emojis List 2024: Copy and Paste
• Best Adblockers for Twitch TV: Enjoy Ad-Free Streaming in 2024
• PS4 vs. PS5: Which PlayStation Should You Buy in 2024?
• Full Stack Developer Roadmap [2024 Updated]

Improve your Coding Skills with Practice

What kind of Experience do you want to share?

• How it works
• Homework answers

Python Answers

Questions: 5 831

Answers by our Experts: 5 728

Ask Your question

Need a fast expert's response?

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS !

Search & Filtering

Create a method named check_angles. The sum of a triangle's three angles should return True if the sum is equal to 180, and False otherwise. The method should print whether the angles belong to a triangle or not.

11.1  Write methods to verify if the triangle is an acute triangle or obtuse triangle.

11.2  Create an instance of the triangle class and call all the defined methods.

11.3  Create three child classes of triangle class - isosceles_triangle, right_triangle and equilateral_triangle.

11.4  Define methods which check for their properties.

Create an empty dictionary called Car_0 . Then fill the dictionary with Keys : color , speed , X_position and Y_position.

car_0 = {'x_position': 10, 'y_position': 72, 'speed': 'medium'} .

a) If the speed is slow the coordinates of the X_pos get incremented by 2.

b) If the speed is Medium the coordinates of the X_pos gets incremented by 9

c) Now if the speed is Fast the coordinates of the X_pos gets incremented by 22.

Print the modified dictionary.

Create a simple Card game in which there are 8 cards which are randomly chosen from a deck. The first card is shown face up. The game asks the player to predict whether the next card in the selection will have a higher or lower value than the currently showing card.

For example, say the card that’s shown is a 3. The player chooses “higher,” and the next card is shown. If that card has a higher value, the player is correct. In this example, if the player had chosen “lower,” they would have been incorrect. If the player guesses correctly, they get 20 points. If they choose incorrectly, they lose 15 points. If the next card to be turned over has the same value as the previous card, the player is incorrect.

Consider an ongoing test cricket series. Following are the names of the players and their scores in the test1 and 2.

Test Match 1 :

Dhoni : 56 , Balaji : 94

Test Match 2 :

Balaji : 80 , Dravid : 105

Calculate the highest number of runs scored by an individual cricketer in both of the matches. Create a python function Max_Score (M) that reads a dictionary M that recognizes the player with the highest total score. This function will return ( Top player , Total Score ) . You can consider the Top player as String who is the highest scorer and Top score as Integer .

Input : Max_Score({‘test1’:{‘Dhoni’:56, ‘Balaji : 85}, ‘test2’:{‘Dhoni’ 87, ‘Balaji’’:200}}) Output : (‘Balaji ‘ , 200)

Write a Python program to demonstrate Polymorphism.

1. Class  Vehicle  with a parameterized function  Fare,  that takes input value as fare and

returns it to calling Objects.

2. Create five separate variables  Bus, Car, Train, Truck and Ship  that call the  Fare

3. Use a third variable  TotalFare  to store the sum of fare for each Vehicle Type. 4. Print the  TotalFare.

Write a Python program to demonstrate multiple inheritance.

1.  Employee  class has 3 data members  EmployeeID ,  Gender  (String) , Salary  and

PerformanceRating ( Out of 5 )  of type int. It has a get() function to get these details from

2.  JoiningDetail  class has a data member  DateOfJoining  of type  Date  and a function

getDoJ  to get the Date of joining of employees.

3.  Information  Class uses the marks from  Employee  class and the  DateOfJoining  date

from the  JoiningDetail  class to calculate the top 3 Employees based on their Ratings and then Display, using  readData , all the details on these employees in Ascending order of their Date Of Joining.

You are given an array of numbers as input: [10,20,10,40,50,45,30,70,5,20,45] and a target value: 50. You are required to find pairs of elements (indices of two numbers) from the given array whose sum equals a specific target number. Your solution should not use the same element twice, thus it must be a single solution for each input

1.1 Write a Python class that defines a function to find pairs which takes 2 parameters (input array and target value) and returns a list of pairs whose sum is equal to target given above. You are required to print the list of pairs and state how many pairs if found. Your solution should call the function to find pairs, then return a list of pairs.

1.2 Given the input array nums in 1.1 above. Write a second program to find a set of good pairs from that input array nums. Here a pair (i,j) is said to be a good pair if nums[i] is the same as nums[j] and i < j. You are required to display an array of good pairs indices and the number of good pairs.

How to find largest number inn list in python

Given a list of integers, write a program to print the sum of all prime numbers in the list of integers.

Note: one is neither prime nor composite number

Using the pass statement

how to get a input here ! example ! 2 4 5 6 7 8 2 4 5 2 3 8 how to get it?

• Programming
• Engineering

Who Can Help Me with My Assignment

There are three certainties in this world: Death, Taxes and Homework Assignments. No matter where you study, and no matter…

How to Finish Assignments When You Can’t

Crunch time is coming, deadlines need to be met, essays need to be submitted, and tests should be studied for.…

How to Effectively Study for a Math Test

Numbers and figures are an essential part of our world, necessary for almost everything we do every day. As important…

Python Enhancement Proposals

• Python »
• PEP Index »

PEP 572 – Assignment Expressions

The importance of real code, exceptional cases, scope of the target, relative precedence of :=, change to evaluation order, differences between assignment expressions and assignment statements, specification changes during implementation, _pydecimal.py, datetime.py, sysconfig.py, simplifying list comprehensions, capturing condition values, changing the scope rules for comprehensions, alternative spellings, special-casing conditional statements, special-casing comprehensions, lowering operator precedence, allowing commas to the right, always requiring parentheses, why not just turn existing assignment into an expression, with assignment expressions, why bother with assignment statements, why not use a sublocal scope and prevent namespace pollution, style guide recommendations, acknowledgements, a numeric example, appendix b: rough code translations for comprehensions, appendix c: no changes to scope semantics.

This is a proposal for creating a way to assign to variables within an expression using the notation NAME := expr .

As part of this change, there is also an update to dictionary comprehension evaluation order to ensure key expressions are executed before value expressions (allowing the key to be bound to a name and then re-used as part of calculating the corresponding value).

During discussion of this PEP, the operator became informally known as “the walrus operator”. The construct’s formal name is “Assignment Expressions” (as per the PEP title), but they may also be referred to as “Named Expressions” (e.g. the CPython reference implementation uses that name internally).

Naming the result of an expression is an important part of programming, allowing a descriptive name to be used in place of a longer expression, and permitting reuse. Currently, this feature is available only in statement form, making it unavailable in list comprehensions and other expression contexts.

Additionally, naming sub-parts of a large expression can assist an interactive debugger, providing useful display hooks and partial results. Without a way to capture sub-expressions inline, this would require refactoring of the original code; with assignment expressions, this merely requires the insertion of a few name := markers. Removing the need to refactor reduces the likelihood that the code be inadvertently changed as part of debugging (a common cause of Heisenbugs), and is easier to dictate to another programmer.

During the development of this PEP many people (supporters and critics both) have had a tendency to focus on toy examples on the one hand, and on overly complex examples on the other.

The danger of toy examples is twofold: they are often too abstract to make anyone go “ooh, that’s compelling”, and they are easily refuted with “I would never write it that way anyway”.

The danger of overly complex examples is that they provide a convenient strawman for critics of the proposal to shoot down (“that’s obfuscated”).

Yet there is some use for both extremely simple and extremely complex examples: they are helpful to clarify the intended semantics. Therefore, there will be some of each below.

However, in order to be compelling , examples should be rooted in real code, i.e. code that was written without any thought of this PEP, as part of a useful application, however large or small. Tim Peters has been extremely helpful by going over his own personal code repository and picking examples of code he had written that (in his view) would have been clearer if rewritten with (sparing) use of assignment expressions. His conclusion: the current proposal would have allowed a modest but clear improvement in quite a few bits of code.

Another use of real code is to observe indirectly how much value programmers place on compactness. Guido van Rossum searched through a Dropbox code base and discovered some evidence that programmers value writing fewer lines over shorter lines.

Case in point: Guido found several examples where a programmer repeated a subexpression, slowing down the program, in order to save one line of code, e.g. instead of writing:

they would write:

Another example illustrates that programmers sometimes do more work to save an extra level of indentation:

This code tries to match pattern2 even if pattern1 has a match (in which case the match on pattern2 is never used). The more efficient rewrite would have been:

Syntax and semantics

In most contexts where arbitrary Python expressions can be used, a named expression can appear. This is of the form NAME := expr where expr is any valid Python expression other than an unparenthesized tuple, and NAME is an identifier.

The value of such a named expression is the same as the incorporated expression, with the additional side-effect that the target is assigned that value:

There are a few places where assignment expressions are not allowed, in order to avoid ambiguities or user confusion:

This rule is included to simplify the choice for the user between an assignment statement and an assignment expression – there is no syntactic position where both are valid.

Again, this rule is included to avoid two visually similar ways of saying the same thing.

This rule is included to disallow excessively confusing code, and because parsing keyword arguments is complex enough already.

This rule is included to discourage side effects in a position whose exact semantics are already confusing to many users (cf. the common style recommendation against mutable default values), and also to echo the similar prohibition in calls (the previous bullet).

The reasoning here is similar to the two previous cases; this ungrouped assortment of symbols and operators composed of : and = is hard to read correctly.

This allows lambda to always bind less tightly than := ; having a name binding at the top level inside a lambda function is unlikely to be of value, as there is no way to make use of it. In cases where the name will be used more than once, the expression is likely to need parenthesizing anyway, so this prohibition will rarely affect code.

This shows that what looks like an assignment operator in an f-string is not always an assignment operator. The f-string parser uses : to indicate formatting options. To preserve backwards compatibility, assignment operator usage inside of f-strings must be parenthesized. As noted above, this usage of the assignment operator is not recommended.

An assignment expression does not introduce a new scope. In most cases the scope in which the target will be bound is self-explanatory: it is the current scope. If this scope contains a nonlocal or global declaration for the target, the assignment expression honors that. A lambda (being an explicit, if anonymous, function definition) counts as a scope for this purpose.

There is one special case: an assignment expression occurring in a list, set or dict comprehension or in a generator expression (below collectively referred to as “comprehensions”) binds the target in the containing scope, honoring a nonlocal or global declaration for the target in that scope, if one exists. For the purpose of this rule the containing scope of a nested comprehension is the scope that contains the outermost comprehension. A lambda counts as a containing scope.

The motivation for this special case is twofold. First, it allows us to conveniently capture a “witness” for an any() expression, or a counterexample for all() , for example:

Second, it allows a compact way of updating mutable state from a comprehension, for example:

However, an assignment expression target name cannot be the same as a for -target name appearing in any comprehension containing the assignment expression. The latter names are local to the comprehension in which they appear, so it would be contradictory for a contained use of the same name to refer to the scope containing the outermost comprehension instead.

For example, [i := i+1 for i in range(5)] is invalid: the for i part establishes that i is local to the comprehension, but the i := part insists that i is not local to the comprehension. The same reason makes these examples invalid too:

While it’s technically possible to assign consistent semantics to these cases, it’s difficult to determine whether those semantics actually make sense in the absence of real use cases. Accordingly, the reference implementation [1] will ensure that such cases raise SyntaxError , rather than executing with implementation defined behaviour.

This restriction applies even if the assignment expression is never executed:

For the comprehension body (the part before the first “for” keyword) and the filter expression (the part after “if” and before any nested “for”), this restriction applies solely to target names that are also used as iteration variables in the comprehension. Lambda expressions appearing in these positions introduce a new explicit function scope, and hence may use assignment expressions with no additional restrictions.

Due to design constraints in the reference implementation (the symbol table analyser cannot easily detect when names are re-used between the leftmost comprehension iterable expression and the rest of the comprehension), named expressions are disallowed entirely as part of comprehension iterable expressions (the part after each “in”, and before any subsequent “if” or “for” keyword):

A further exception applies when an assignment expression occurs in a comprehension whose containing scope is a class scope. If the rules above were to result in the target being assigned in that class’s scope, the assignment expression is expressly invalid. This case also raises SyntaxError :

(The reason for the latter exception is the implicit function scope created for comprehensions – there is currently no runtime mechanism for a function to refer to a variable in the containing class scope, and we do not want to add such a mechanism. If this issue ever gets resolved this special case may be removed from the specification of assignment expressions. Note that the problem already exists for using a variable defined in the class scope from a comprehension.)

See Appendix B for some examples of how the rules for targets in comprehensions translate to equivalent code.

The := operator groups more tightly than a comma in all syntactic positions where it is legal, but less tightly than all other operators, including or , and , not , and conditional expressions ( A if C else B ). As follows from section “Exceptional cases” above, it is never allowed at the same level as = . In case a different grouping is desired, parentheses should be used.

The := operator may be used directly in a positional function call argument; however it is invalid directly in a keyword argument.

Some examples to clarify what’s technically valid or invalid:

Most of the “valid” examples above are not recommended, since human readers of Python source code who are quickly glancing at some code may miss the distinction. But simple cases are not objectionable:

This PEP recommends always putting spaces around := , similar to PEP 8 ’s recommendation for = when used for assignment, whereas the latter disallows spaces around = used for keyword arguments.)

In order to have precisely defined semantics, the proposal requires evaluation order to be well-defined. This is technically not a new requirement, as function calls may already have side effects. Python already has a rule that subexpressions are generally evaluated from left to right. However, assignment expressions make these side effects more visible, and we propose a single change to the current evaluation order:

• In a dict comprehension {X: Y for ...} , Y is currently evaluated before X . We propose to change this so that X is evaluated before Y . (In a dict display like {X: Y} this is already the case, and also in dict((X, Y) for ...) which should clearly be equivalent to the dict comprehension.)

Most importantly, since := is an expression, it can be used in contexts where statements are illegal, including lambda functions and comprehensions.

Conversely, assignment expressions don’t support the advanced features found in assignment statements:

• Multiple targets are not directly supported: x = y = z = 0 # Equivalent: (z := (y := (x := 0)))
• Single assignment targets other than a single NAME are not supported: # No equivalent a [ i ] = x self . rest = []
• Priority around commas is different: x = 1 , 2 # Sets x to (1, 2) ( x := 1 , 2 ) # Sets x to 1
• Iterable packing and unpacking (both regular or extended forms) are not supported: # Equivalent needs extra parentheses loc = x , y # Use (loc := (x, y)) info = name , phone , * rest # Use (info := (name, phone, *rest)) # No equivalent px , py , pz = position name , phone , email , * other_info = contact
• Inline type annotations are not supported: # Closest equivalent is "p: Optional[int]" as a separate declaration p : Optional [ int ] = None
• Augmented assignment is not supported: total += tax # Equivalent: (total := total + tax)

The following changes have been made based on implementation experience and additional review after the PEP was first accepted and before Python 3.8 was released:

• for consistency with other similar exceptions, and to avoid locking in an exception name that is not necessarily going to improve clarity for end users, the originally proposed TargetScopeError subclass of SyntaxError was dropped in favour of just raising SyntaxError directly. [3]
• due to a limitation in CPython’s symbol table analysis process, the reference implementation raises SyntaxError for all uses of named expressions inside comprehension iterable expressions, rather than only raising them when the named expression target conflicts with one of the iteration variables in the comprehension. This could be revisited given sufficiently compelling examples, but the extra complexity needed to implement the more selective restriction doesn’t seem worthwhile for purely hypothetical use cases.

Examples from the Python standard library

env_base is only used on these lines, putting its assignment on the if moves it as the “header” of the block.

• Current: env_base = os . environ . get ( "PYTHONUSERBASE" , None ) if env_base : return env_base
• Improved: if env_base := os . environ . get ( "PYTHONUSERBASE" , None ): return env_base

Avoid nested if and remove one indentation level.

• Current: if self . _is_special : ans = self . _check_nans ( context = context ) if ans : return ans
• Improved: if self . _is_special and ( ans := self . _check_nans ( context = context )): return ans

Code looks more regular and avoid multiple nested if. (See Appendix A for the origin of this example.)

• Current: reductor = dispatch_table . get ( cls ) if reductor : rv = reductor ( x ) else : reductor = getattr ( x , "__reduce_ex__" , None ) if reductor : rv = reductor ( 4 ) else : reductor = getattr ( x , "__reduce__" , None ) if reductor : rv = reductor () else : raise Error ( "un(deep)copyable object of type %s " % cls )
• Improved: if reductor := dispatch_table . get ( cls ): rv = reductor ( x ) elif reductor := getattr ( x , "__reduce_ex__" , None ): rv = reductor ( 4 ) elif reductor := getattr ( x , "__reduce__" , None ): rv = reductor () else : raise Error ( "un(deep)copyable object of type %s " % cls )

tz is only used for s += tz , moving its assignment inside the if helps to show its scope.

• Current: s = _format_time ( self . _hour , self . _minute , self . _second , self . _microsecond , timespec ) tz = self . _tzstr () if tz : s += tz return s
• Improved: s = _format_time ( self . _hour , self . _minute , self . _second , self . _microsecond , timespec ) if tz := self . _tzstr (): s += tz return s

Calling fp.readline() in the while condition and calling .match() on the if lines make the code more compact without making it harder to understand.

• Current: while True : line = fp . readline () if not line : break m = define_rx . match ( line ) if m : n , v = m . group ( 1 , 2 ) try : v = int ( v ) except ValueError : pass vars [ n ] = v else : m = undef_rx . match ( line ) if m : vars [ m . group ( 1 )] = 0
• Improved: while line := fp . readline (): if m := define_rx . match ( line ): n , v = m . group ( 1 , 2 ) try : v = int ( v ) except ValueError : pass vars [ n ] = v elif m := undef_rx . match ( line ): vars [ m . group ( 1 )] = 0

A list comprehension can map and filter efficiently by capturing the condition:

Similarly, a subexpression can be reused within the main expression, by giving it a name on first use:

Note that in both cases the variable y is bound in the containing scope (i.e. at the same level as results or stuff ).

Assignment expressions can be used to good effect in the header of an if or while statement:

Particularly with the while loop, this can remove the need to have an infinite loop, an assignment, and a condition. It also creates a smooth parallel between a loop which simply uses a function call as its condition, and one which uses that as its condition but also uses the actual value.

An example from the low-level UNIX world:

Rejected alternative proposals

Proposals broadly similar to this one have come up frequently on python-ideas. Below are a number of alternative syntaxes, some of them specific to comprehensions, which have been rejected in favour of the one given above.

A previous version of this PEP proposed subtle changes to the scope rules for comprehensions, to make them more usable in class scope and to unify the scope of the “outermost iterable” and the rest of the comprehension. However, this part of the proposal would have caused backwards incompatibilities, and has been withdrawn so the PEP can focus on assignment expressions.

Broadly the same semantics as the current proposal, but spelled differently.

Since EXPR as NAME already has meaning in import , except and with statements (with different semantics), this would create unnecessary confusion or require special-casing (e.g. to forbid assignment within the headers of these statements).

(Note that with EXPR as VAR does not simply assign the value of EXPR to VAR – it calls EXPR.__enter__() and assigns the result of that to VAR .)

Additional reasons to prefer := over this spelling include:

• In if f(x) as y the assignment target doesn’t jump out at you – it just reads like if f x blah blah and it is too similar visually to if f(x) and y .
• import foo as bar
• except Exc as var
• with ctxmgr() as var

To the contrary, the assignment expression does not belong to the if or while that starts the line, and we intentionally allow assignment expressions in other contexts as well.

• NAME = EXPR
• if NAME := EXPR

reinforces the visual recognition of assignment expressions.

This syntax is inspired by languages such as R and Haskell, and some programmable calculators. (Note that a left-facing arrow y <- f(x) is not possible in Python, as it would be interpreted as less-than and unary minus.) This syntax has a slight advantage over ‘as’ in that it does not conflict with with , except and import , but otherwise is equivalent. But it is entirely unrelated to Python’s other use of -> (function return type annotations), and compared to := (which dates back to Algol-58) it has a much weaker tradition.

This has the advantage that leaked usage can be readily detected, removing some forms of syntactic ambiguity. However, this would be the only place in Python where a variable’s scope is encoded into its name, making refactoring harder.

Execution order is inverted (the indented body is performed first, followed by the “header”). This requires a new keyword, unless an existing keyword is repurposed (most likely with: ). See PEP 3150 for prior discussion on this subject (with the proposed keyword being given: ).

This syntax has fewer conflicts than as does (conflicting only with the raise Exc from Exc notation), but is otherwise comparable to it. Instead of paralleling with expr as target: (which can be useful but can also be confusing), this has no parallels, but is evocative.

One of the most popular use-cases is if and while statements. Instead of a more general solution, this proposal enhances the syntax of these two statements to add a means of capturing the compared value:

This works beautifully if and ONLY if the desired condition is based on the truthiness of the captured value. It is thus effective for specific use-cases (regex matches, socket reads that return '' when done), and completely useless in more complicated cases (e.g. where the condition is f(x) < 0 and you want to capture the value of f(x) ). It also has no benefit to list comprehensions.

Advantages: No syntactic ambiguities. Disadvantages: Answers only a fraction of possible use-cases, even in if / while statements.

Another common use-case is comprehensions (list/set/dict, and genexps). As above, proposals have been made for comprehension-specific solutions.

This brings the subexpression to a location in between the ‘for’ loop and the expression. It introduces an additional language keyword, which creates conflicts. Of the three, where reads the most cleanly, but also has the greatest potential for conflict (e.g. SQLAlchemy and numpy have where methods, as does tkinter.dnd.Icon in the standard library).

As above, but reusing the with keyword. Doesn’t read too badly, and needs no additional language keyword. Is restricted to comprehensions, though, and cannot as easily be transformed into “longhand” for-loop syntax. Has the C problem that an equals sign in an expression can now create a name binding, rather than performing a comparison. Would raise the question of why “with NAME = EXPR:” cannot be used as a statement on its own.

As per option 2, but using as rather than an equals sign. Aligns syntactically with other uses of as for name binding, but a simple transformation to for-loop longhand would create drastically different semantics; the meaning of with inside a comprehension would be completely different from the meaning as a stand-alone statement, while retaining identical syntax.

Regardless of the spelling chosen, this introduces a stark difference between comprehensions and the equivalent unrolled long-hand form of the loop. It is no longer possible to unwrap the loop into statement form without reworking any name bindings. The only keyword that can be repurposed to this task is with , thus giving it sneakily different semantics in a comprehension than in a statement; alternatively, a new keyword is needed, with all the costs therein.

There are two logical precedences for the := operator. Either it should bind as loosely as possible, as does statement-assignment; or it should bind more tightly than comparison operators. Placing its precedence between the comparison and arithmetic operators (to be precise: just lower than bitwise OR) allows most uses inside while and if conditions to be spelled without parentheses, as it is most likely that you wish to capture the value of something, then perform a comparison on it:

Once find() returns -1, the loop terminates. If := binds as loosely as = does, this would capture the result of the comparison (generally either True or False ), which is less useful.

While this behaviour would be convenient in many situations, it is also harder to explain than “the := operator behaves just like the assignment statement”, and as such, the precedence for := has been made as close as possible to that of = (with the exception that it binds tighter than comma).

Some critics have claimed that the assignment expressions should allow unparenthesized tuples on the right, so that these two would be equivalent:

(With the current version of the proposal, the latter would be equivalent to ((point := x), y) .)

However, adopting this stance would logically lead to the conclusion that when used in a function call, assignment expressions also bind less tight than comma, so we’d have the following confusing equivalence:

The less confusing option is to make := bind more tightly than comma.

It’s been proposed to just always require parentheses around an assignment expression. This would resolve many ambiguities, and indeed parentheses will frequently be needed to extract the desired subexpression. But in the following cases the extra parentheses feel redundant:

Frequently Raised Objections

C and its derivatives define the = operator as an expression, rather than a statement as is Python’s way. This allows assignments in more contexts, including contexts where comparisons are more common. The syntactic similarity between if (x == y) and if (x = y) belies their drastically different semantics. Thus this proposal uses := to clarify the distinction.

The two forms have different flexibilities. The := operator can be used inside a larger expression; the = statement can be augmented to += and its friends, can be chained, and can assign to attributes and subscripts.

Previous revisions of this proposal involved sublocal scope (restricted to a single statement), preventing name leakage and namespace pollution. While a definite advantage in a number of situations, this increases complexity in many others, and the costs are not justified by the benefits. In the interests of language simplicity, the name bindings created here are exactly equivalent to any other name bindings, including that usage at class or module scope will create externally-visible names. This is no different from for loops or other constructs, and can be solved the same way: del the name once it is no longer needed, or prefix it with an underscore.

(The author wishes to thank Guido van Rossum and Christoph Groth for their suggestions to move the proposal in this direction. [2] )

As expression assignments can sometimes be used equivalently to statement assignments, the question of which should be preferred will arise. For the benefit of style guides such as PEP 8 , two recommendations are suggested.

• If either assignment statements or assignment expressions can be used, prefer statements; they are a clear declaration of intent.
• If using assignment expressions would lead to ambiguity about execution order, restructure it to use statements instead.

The authors wish to thank Alyssa Coghlan and Steven D’Aprano for their considerable contributions to this proposal, and members of the core-mentorship mailing list for assistance with implementation.

Appendix A: Tim Peters’s findings

Here’s a brief essay Tim Peters wrote on the topic.

I dislike “busy” lines of code, and also dislike putting conceptually unrelated logic on a single line. So, for example, instead of:

instead. So I suspected I’d find few places I’d want to use assignment expressions. I didn’t even consider them for lines already stretching halfway across the screen. In other cases, “unrelated” ruled:

is a vast improvement over the briefer:

The original two statements are doing entirely different conceptual things, and slamming them together is conceptually insane.

In other cases, combining related logic made it harder to understand, such as rewriting:

as the briefer:

The while test there is too subtle, crucially relying on strict left-to-right evaluation in a non-short-circuiting or method-chaining context. My brain isn’t wired that way.

But cases like that were rare. Name binding is very frequent, and “sparse is better than dense” does not mean “almost empty is better than sparse”. For example, I have many functions that return None or 0 to communicate “I have nothing useful to return in this case, but since that’s expected often I’m not going to annoy you with an exception”. This is essentially the same as regular expression search functions returning None when there is no match. So there was lots of code of the form:

I find that clearer, and certainly a bit less typing and pattern-matching reading, as:

It’s also nice to trade away a small amount of horizontal whitespace to get another _line_ of surrounding code on screen. I didn’t give much weight to this at first, but it was so very frequent it added up, and I soon enough became annoyed that I couldn’t actually run the briefer code. That surprised me!

There are other cases where assignment expressions really shine. Rather than pick another from my code, Kirill Balunov gave a lovely example from the standard library’s copy() function in copy.py :

The ever-increasing indentation is semantically misleading: the logic is conceptually flat, “the first test that succeeds wins”:

Using easy assignment expressions allows the visual structure of the code to emphasize the conceptual flatness of the logic; ever-increasing indentation obscured it.

A smaller example from my code delighted me, both allowing to put inherently related logic in a single line, and allowing to remove an annoying “artificial” indentation level:

That if is about as long as I want my lines to get, but remains easy to follow.

So, in all, in most lines binding a name, I wouldn’t use assignment expressions, but because that construct is so very frequent, that leaves many places I would. In most of the latter, I found a small win that adds up due to how often it occurs, and in the rest I found a moderate to major win. I’d certainly use it more often than ternary if , but significantly less often than augmented assignment.

I have another example that quite impressed me at the time.

Where all variables are positive integers, and a is at least as large as the n’th root of x, this algorithm returns the floor of the n’th root of x (and roughly doubling the number of accurate bits per iteration):

It’s not obvious why that works, but is no more obvious in the “loop and a half” form. It’s hard to prove correctness without building on the right insight (the “arithmetic mean - geometric mean inequality”), and knowing some non-trivial things about how nested floor functions behave. That is, the challenges are in the math, not really in the coding.

If you do know all that, then the assignment-expression form is easily read as “while the current guess is too large, get a smaller guess”, where the “too large?” test and the new guess share an expensive sub-expression.

To my eyes, the original form is harder to understand:

This appendix attempts to clarify (though not specify) the rules when a target occurs in a comprehension or in a generator expression. For a number of illustrative examples we show the original code, containing a comprehension, and the translation, where the comprehension has been replaced by an equivalent generator function plus some scaffolding.

Since [x for ...] is equivalent to list(x for ...) these examples all use list comprehensions without loss of generality. And since these examples are meant to clarify edge cases of the rules, they aren’t trying to look like real code.

Note: comprehensions are already implemented via synthesizing nested generator functions like those in this appendix. The new part is adding appropriate declarations to establish the intended scope of assignment expression targets (the same scope they resolve to as if the assignment were performed in the block containing the outermost comprehension). For type inference purposes, these illustrative expansions do not imply that assignment expression targets are always Optional (but they do indicate the target binding scope).

Let’s start with a reminder of what code is generated for a generator expression without assignment expression.

• Original code (EXPR usually references VAR): def f (): a = [ EXPR for VAR in ITERABLE ]
• Translation (let’s not worry about name conflicts): def f (): def genexpr ( iterator ): for VAR in iterator : yield EXPR a = list ( genexpr ( iter ( ITERABLE )))

Let’s add a simple assignment expression.

• Original code: def f (): a = [ TARGET := EXPR for VAR in ITERABLE ]
• Translation: def f (): if False : TARGET = None # Dead code to ensure TARGET is a local variable def genexpr ( iterator ): nonlocal TARGET for VAR in iterator : TARGET = EXPR yield TARGET a = list ( genexpr ( iter ( ITERABLE )))

Let’s add a global TARGET declaration in f() .

• Original code: def f (): global TARGET a = [ TARGET := EXPR for VAR in ITERABLE ]
• Translation: def f (): global TARGET def genexpr ( iterator ): global TARGET for VAR in iterator : TARGET = EXPR yield TARGET a = list ( genexpr ( iter ( ITERABLE )))

Or instead let’s add a nonlocal TARGET declaration in f() .

• Original code: def g (): TARGET = ... def f (): nonlocal TARGET a = [ TARGET := EXPR for VAR in ITERABLE ]
• Translation: def g (): TARGET = ... def f (): nonlocal TARGET def genexpr ( iterator ): nonlocal TARGET for VAR in iterator : TARGET = EXPR yield TARGET a = list ( genexpr ( iter ( ITERABLE )))

Finally, let’s nest two comprehensions.

• Original code: def f (): a = [[ TARGET := i for i in range ( 3 )] for j in range ( 2 )] # I.e., a = [[0, 1, 2], [0, 1, 2]] print ( TARGET ) # prints 2
• Translation: def f (): if False : TARGET = None def outer_genexpr ( outer_iterator ): nonlocal TARGET def inner_generator ( inner_iterator ): nonlocal TARGET for i in inner_iterator : TARGET = i yield i for j in outer_iterator : yield list ( inner_generator ( range ( 3 ))) a = list ( outer_genexpr ( range ( 2 ))) print ( TARGET )

Because it has been a point of confusion, note that nothing about Python’s scoping semantics is changed. Function-local scopes continue to be resolved at compile time, and to have indefinite temporal extent at run time (“full closures”). Example:

This document has been placed in the public domain.

Source: https://github.com/python/peps/blob/main/peps/pep-0572.rst

Last modified: 2023-10-11 12:05:51 GMT

previous episode

Python for absolute beginners, next episode, variables and assignment.

Overview Teaching: 15 min Exercises: 15 min Questions How can I store data in programs? Objectives Write scripts that assign values to variables and perform calculations with those values. Correctly trace value changes in scripts that use assignment.

Use variables to store values

Variables are one of the fundamental building blocks of Python. A variable is like a tiny container where you store values and data, such as filenames, words, numbers, collections of words and numbers, and more.

The variable name will point to a value that you “assign” it. You might think about variable assignment like putting a value “into” the variable, as if the variable is a little box 🎁

(In fact, a variable is not a container as such but more like an adress label that points to a container with a given value. This difference will become relevant once we start talking about lists and mutable data types.)

You assign variables with an equals sign ( = ). In Python, a single equals sign = is the “assignment operator.” (A double equals sign == is the “real” equals sign.)

• Variables are names for values.
• In Python the = symbol assigns the value on the right to the name on the left.
• The variable is created when a value is assigned to it.
• Here, Python assigns an age to a variable age and a name in quotation marks to a variable first_name :

Variable names

Variable names can be as long or as short as you want, but there are certain rules you must follow.

• Cannot start with a digit.
• Cannot contain spaces, quotation marks, or other punctuation.
• May contain an underscore (typically used to separate words in long variable names).
• Having an underscore at the beginning of a variable name like _alistairs_real_age has a special meaning. So we won’t do that until we understand the convention.
• The standard naming convention for variable names in Python is the so-called “snake case”, where each word is separated by an underscore. For example my_first_variable . You can read more about naming conventions in Python here .

Use meaningful variable names

Python doesn’t care what you call variables as long as they obey the rules (alphanumeric characters and the underscore). As you start to code, you will almost certainly be tempted to use extremely short variables names like f . Your fingers will get tired. Your coffee will wear off. You will see other people using variables like f . You’ll promise yourself that you’ll definitely remember what f means. But you probably won’t.

So, resist the temptation of bad variable names! Clear and precisely-named variables will:

• Make your code more readable (both to yourself and others).
• Reinforce your understanding of Python and what’s happening in the code.
• Clarify and strengthen your thinking.

Use meaningful variable names to help other people understand what the program does. The most important “other person” is your future self!

Python is case-sensitive

Python thinks that upper- and lower-case letters are different, so Name and name are different variables. There are conventions for using upper-case letters at the start of variable names so we will use lower-case letters for now.

Off-Limits Names

The only variable names that are off-limits are names that are reserved by, or built into, the Python programming language itself — such as print , True , and list . Some of these you can overwrite into variable names (not ideal!), but Jupyter Lab (and many other environments and editors) will catch this by colour coding your variable. If your would-be variable is colour-coded green, rethink your name choice. This is not something to worry too much about. You can get the object back by resetting your kernel.

Use print() to display values

We can check to see what’s “inside” variables by running a cell with the variable’s name. This is one of the handiest features of a Jupyter notebook. Outside the Jupyter environment, you would need to use the print() function to display the variable.

You can run the print() function inside the Jupyter environment, too. This is sometimes useful because Jupyter will only display the last variable in a cell, while print() can display multiple variables. Additionally, Jupyter will display text with \n characters (which means “new line”), while print() will display the text appropriately formatted with new lines.

• Python has a built-in function called print() that prints things as text.
• Provide values to the function (i.e., the things to print) in parentheses.
• To add a string to the printout, wrap the string in single or double quotations.
• The values passed to the function are called ‘arguments’ and are separated by commas.
• When using the print() function, we can also separate with a ‘+’ sign. However, when using ‘+’ we have to add spaces in between manually.
• print() automatically puts a single space between items to separate them.
• And wraps around to a new line at the end.

Variables must be created before they are used

If a variable doesn’t exist yet, or if the name has been misspelled, Python reports an error (unlike some languages, which “guess” a default value).

The last line of an error message is usually the most informative. This message lets us know that there is no variable called eye_color in the script.

Variables Persist Between Cells Variables defined in one cell exist in all other cells once executed, so the relative location of cells in the notebook do not matter (i.e., cells lower down can still affect those above). Notice the number in the square brackets [ ] to the left of the cell. These numbers indicate the order, in which the cells have been executed. Cells with lower numbers will affect cells with higher numbers as Python runs the cells chronologically. As a best practice, we recommend you keep your notebook in chronological order so that it is easier for the human eye to read and make sense of, as well as to avoid any errors if you close and reopen your project, and then rerun what you have done. Remember: Notebook cells are just a way to organize a program! As far as Python is concerned, all of the source code is one long set of instructions.

Variables can be used in calculations

• We can use variables in calculations just as if they were values. Remember, we assigned 42 to age a few lines ago.

This code works in the following way. We are reassigning the value of the variable age by taking its previous value (42) and adding 3, thus getting our new value of 45.

Use an index to get a single character from a string

• The characters (individual letters, numbers, and so on) in a string are ordered. For example, the string ‘AB’ is not the same as ‘BA’. Because of this ordering, we can treat the string as a list of characters.
• Each position in the string (first, second, etc.) is given a number. This number is called an index or sometimes a subscript.
• Indices are numbered from 0 rather than 1.
• Use the position’s index in square brackets to get the character at that position.

Use a slice to get a substring

A part of a string is called a substring. A substring can be as short as a single character. A slice is a part of a string (or, more generally, any list-like thing). We take a slice by using [start:stop] , where start is replaced with the index of the first element we want and stop is replaced with the index of the element just after the last element we want. Mathematically, you might say that a slice selects [start:stop] . The difference between stop and start is the slice’s length. Taking a slice does not change the contents of the original string. Instead, the slice is a copy of part of the original string.

Use the built-in function len() to find the length of a string

The built-in function len() is used to find the length of a string (and later, of other data types, too).

Note that the result is 6 and not 7. This is because it is the length of the value of the variable (i.e. 'helium' ) that is being counted and not the name of the variable (i.e. element )

Also note that nested functions are evaluated from the inside out, just like in mathematics. Thus, Python first reads the len() function, then the print() function.

Choosing a Name Which is a better variable name, m , min , or minutes ? Why? Hint: think about which code you would rather inherit from someone who is leaving the library: ts = m * 60 + s tot_sec = min * 60 + sec total_seconds = minutes * 60 + seconds Solution minutes is better because min might mean something like “minimum” (and actually does in Python, but we haven’t seen that yet).

Swapping Values Draw a table showing the values of the variables in this program after each statement is executed. In simple terms, what do the last three lines of this program do? x = 1.0 y = 3.0 swap = x x = y y = swap Solution swap = x # x->1.0 y->3.0 swap->1.0 x = y # x->3.0 y->3.0 swap->1.0 y = swap # x->3.0 y->1.0 swap->1.0 These three lines exchange the values in x and y using the swap variable for temporary storage. This is a fairly common programming idiom.

Predicting Values What is the final value of position in the program below? (Try to predict the value without running the program, then check your prediction.) initial = "left" position = initial initial = "right" Solution initial = "left" # Initial is assigned the string "left" position = initial # Position is assigned the variable initial, currently "left" initial = "right" # Initial is assigned the string "right" print(position) left The last assignment to position was “left”

Can you slice integers? If you assign a = 123 , what happens if you try to get the second digit of a ? Solution Numbers are not stored in the written representation, so they can’t be treated like strings. a = 123 print(a[1]) TypeError: 'int' object is not subscriptable

Slicing What does the following program print? library_name = 'social sciences' print('library_name[1:3] is:', library_name[1:3]) If thing is a variable name, low is a low number, and high is a high number: What does thing[low:high] do? What does thing[low:] (without a value after the colon) do? What does thing[:high] (without a value before the colon) do? What does thing[:] (just a colon) do? What does thing[number:negative-number] do? Solution library_name[1:3] is: oc It will slice the string, starting at the low index and ending an element before the high index It will slice the string, starting at the low index and stopping at the end of the string It will slice the string, starting at the beginning on the string, and ending an element before the high index It will print the entire string It will slice the string, starting the number index, and ending a distance of the absolute value of negative-number elements from the end of the string

Key Points Use variables to store values. Use meaningful variable names. Python is case-sensitive. Use print() to display values. Variables must be created before they are used. Variables persist between cells. Variables can be used in calculations. Use an index to get a single character from a string. Use a slice to get a substring. Use the built-in function len to find the length of a string.

Join us and get access to thousands of tutorials and a community of expert Pythonistas.

This lesson is for members only. Join us and get access to thousands of tutorials and a community of expert Pythonistas.

Assignment Expressions

For more information on concepts covered in this lesson, you can check out:

• Defining Main Functions in Python | Real Python Tutorial
• The Walrus Operator: Python 3.8 Assignment Expressions | Real Python Tutorial

00:00 Here’s a feature introduced in version 3.8 of Python, which can simplify the function we’re currently working on. It’s called an assignment expression, and it allows you to save the return value of a function to a variable while at the same time doing something else with the return value. C and C++ programmers are very familiar with this concept, although we often do it by accident instead of on purpose. With Python’s notation, often referred to as the walrus operator, you have to be deliberate when using it, meaning you won’t make a lot of the mistakes I made when accidentally performing this type of operation.

00:38 In this case, the tryParse() function is still going to be evaluated and used in the condition for the if statement, but at the same time, its value will also be saved to the variable number .

00:50 This version of the program also takes advantage of the fact that tryParse() will return None for the numeric part of the return value tuple if the attempted conversion failed. You can now use this to test if the tryParse() function worked, so you don’t even need to return the Boolean value anymore.

01:09 Just have it return a proper numeric value or None and let the test be whether or not the value return was None . So here, you see the script to test this new version with the same strings you’ve seen tested before.

01:25 tryParse() now only returns the numeric value, if it worked, or None , if it didn’t. The testing script checks to see if the value returned is not None and at same time saves that return value to the variable number .

01:47 If it is indeed not None , that means it returned a value which can be used—in this case, displayed. If the return value was None , then the value should be ignored and the program should take some corrective action or at least display an error.

02:05 I can run this for you.

02:14 And you see, we get the same output here as you did in the last lesson. And if you don’t believe me, let me show you the first run again.

02:28 See? Same output. The function is behaving the way it did all the way back at the beginning of this lesson. We’ve just changed its implementation to make it more useful.

02:39 This version actually has some advantages over the original. I’ll let ptpython run the script again as I import it.

02:52 By the way, there’s a way to write a script so that it won’t run when you import it into a REPL. I’ve just chosen not to add that to my code examples. You can look up Defining Main Functions in Python here on Real Python for more information on that. Anyway, since this function only returns a numeric value and not a tuple, you can use its return value in other expressions.

03:15 So I can multiply 10 by the result of parsing the string "10" , and this is even written to take advantage of the int() function’s keyword parameter base , so I could write a string in hexadecimal and it will be parsed correctly and used as well.

03:37 If you’re a bit hesitant to use it like this, in case it might fail, then use it in Python’s conditional statement.

03:53 So, we’ll use the assignment operator here and attempt to parse the string "123" , saving it to n , and if it indeed is not None , we’ll display n .

04:09 We need some default value to use if the string can’t be parsed properly. In the tutorial, he uses 1 , so I’ll use that as well. And I forgot the equal sign ( = ) in the walrus operator.

04:28 There we go. And here’s an example where it fails and it’ll use the default value of 1 from the else part of the conditional statement.

04:41 Give it a string it can’t parse.

04:46 This will be None , so the condition will be False , and this will return the default value 1 at the end of this expression. Again, the assignment expression was introduced in Python version 3.8, so if you’re using a code base requiring an earlier version of Python, you’ll have to use the techniques you saw in the last lesson.

05:09 Next, you’ll start taking a closer look at how assignment works in Python.

Become a Member to join the conversation.

• Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers
• Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand
• OverflowAI GenAI features for Teams
• OverflowAPI Train & fine-tune LLMs
• Labs The future of collective knowledge sharing
• About the company Visit the blog

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most.

Q&A for work

Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.

Get early access and see previews of new features.

What is this kind of assignment in Python called? a = b = True

I know about tuple unpacking but what is this assignment called where you have multiple equals signs on a single line? a la a = b = True

It always trips me up a bit especially when the RHS is mutable, but I'm having real trouble finding the right keywords to search for in the docs.

• variable-assignment

• 6 I would call them " chained assignments ." –  senderle Commented Jul 16, 2012 at 5:16
• Does this answer your question? How do chained assignments work? –  Basj Commented Apr 15, 2020 at 16:52

4 Answers 4

It's a chain of assignments and the term used to describe it is...

- Could I get a drumroll please?

Chained Assignment .

I just gave it a quite google run and found that there isn't that much to read on the topic, probably since most people find it very straight-forward to use (and only the true geeks would like to know more about the topic).

In the previous expression the order of evaluation can be viewed as starting at the right-most = and then working towards the left, which would be equivalent of writing:

The above order is what most language describe an assignment-chain , but python does it differently. In python the expression is evaluated as this below equivalent, though it won't result in any other result than what is previously described.

Further reading available here on stackoverflow:

• How do chained assignments work? python

• 8 It's calling this 'chained assignment' that is the real culprit. It'd be chained assignment if a = b = c meant that b = c is executed before a = b , but as you show that is not the case. Assignment takes place sequentially instead. –  Martijn Pieters Commented Apr 16, 2013 at 19:51
• 6 This clarifies that in situations where like x = dictionary['x'] = value the dictionary does not use set then get (like would be done if it expanded to dictionary['x'] = value; x = dictionary['x'] ) but instead only sets the dictionary value. –  coderforlife Commented Jun 9, 2015 at 2:19

@refp's answer is further supported with this output using the dis (disassembly) module:

The RHS is retrieved and duplicated, then stored into the destination variables left-to-right (try this yourself with e = f = g = h = x ).

Some other posters have been confused if the RHS is a function call, like a = b = fn() - the RHS is only evaluated once, and then the result assigned to each successive variable. This may cause unwanted sharing if the returned value is a mutable, like a list or dict.

For those using threading , it is useful to note that there is no "atomicity" implied by the chained assignment form over multiple explicit assignment statements - a thread switch could occur between the assignments to g and h, and another thread looking at the two of them could see different values in the two variables.

From the documentation, 7.2. Assignment statements , g and h being two target lists , x being the expression list :

assignment_stmt ::= (target_list "=")+ (expression_list | yield_expression) An assignment statement evaluates the expression list (remember that this can be a single expression or a comma-separated list, the latter yielding a tuple) and assigns the single resulting object to each of the target lists, from left to right .

• 1 is there any documentation for this left-to-right evaluation available? –  Ashwini Chaudhary Commented Oct 4, 2012 at 7:49
• 1 @AshwiniChaudhary Yes, I've added the relevant excerpt from the documentation. –  phant0m Commented Jan 7, 2016 at 15:06

OK, "chained assignment" was the search term I was after, but after a bit more digging I think it's not strictly correct. but it is easier to search for than "a special case of the assignment statement".

The Wikipedia article senderle linked to says:

In Python, assignment statements are not expressions and thus do not return a value. Instead, chained assignments are a series of statements with multiple targets for a single expression. The assignments are executed left-to-right so that i = arr[i] = f() evaluates the expression f() , then assigns the result to the leftmost target, i , and then assigns the same result to the next target, arr[i] , using the new value of i .

Another blog post says:

In Python, assignment statements do not return a value. Chained assignment (or more precisely, code that looks like chained assignment statements) is recognized and supported as a special case of the assignment statement.

This seems the most correct to me, on a closer reading of the docs - in particular (target_list "=")+ - which also say

An assignment statement evaluates the expression list ... and assigns the single resulting object to each of the target lists, from left to right.

So it's not really "evaluated from right-most to left" - the RHS is evaluated and then assigned from left-most target to right - not that I can think of any real-world (or even contrived) examples where it would make a difference.

• my description is from the developers point of view, as you state yourself: there is no real-world scenario where the wording would result in different results. Or well, now I can actually think of one.. hold on, will update my answer with a little snippet to explain what I mean. –  Filip Roséen Commented Jul 16, 2012 at 6:54
• nevermind, it won't make sense (and can't be done without a massive python hack, which is beyond the scope of the question), though I'll update my answer with some information from your post. –  Filip Roséen Commented Jul 16, 2012 at 6:57
• please remember that this isn't like a normal forum where you can reply to previous posts with a new answer, if you have comments regarding contents in one post please use the "comment"-feature, quoting another answer in your post might cause trouble if one post is later deleted/altered. –  Filip Roséen Commented Jul 16, 2012 at 7:14
• @refp I know how to use Stack Overflow. I wasn't replying to your answer, it prompted me to do some more digging and find my own answer. Last time I checked that was the right way to do things - blog.stackoverflow.com/2011/07/… –  pfctdayelise Commented Jul 16, 2012 at 7:33
• 2 Contrived example to show order can matter: x = [0, 1, 2, 3]; x[0:2] = x[1:3] = [4]; results in [4, 4] , if you reverse them then it results in [4, 3] . –  RemcoGerlich Commented Jul 21, 2016 at 14:36

got bitten by python's Chained Assignment today, due to my ignorance. in code

what I expected was

whereas I got below, which produce a self loop in the list, leave me in a endless loop, whoops...

since for a = b = c, one way (python, for example) equivalent to

and have equal right operand for two assignment.

the other (C++, for example) equivalent to

since in this case a = b = c is basically

and two right hand operand could be different.

That why similar code works well in C++.

• Same! I think relying on this ordering is not pythonic however (I was interested in being "tricky" rather than sure it would work), any reader is not going to be 100% which way this goes. Better to be explicit in a case like this. –  Andy Hayden Commented Mar 14, 2017 at 5:27
• 1 The pythonic way to do this would be to use tuple assignment/unpack (if I read your expected code correctly): tail, tail.next = tail.next, l1 . The RHS gets fully evaluated, and then assigned left-to-right into the LHS tuple. –  PaulMcG Commented Jul 15, 2019 at 12:28

Your Answer

Reminder: Answers generated by artificial intelligence tools are not allowed on Stack Overflow. Learn more

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest.

Required, but never shown

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy .

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged python variable-assignment or ask your own question .

• The Overflow Blog
• The evolution of full stack engineers
• One of the best ways to get value for AI coding tools: generating tests
• Featured on Meta
• Bringing clarity to status tag usage on meta sites
• Join Stack Overflow’s CEO and me for the first Stack IRL Community Event in...
• Feedback requested: How do you use tag hover descriptions for curating and do...
• Staging Ground Reviewer Motivation
• What does a new user need in a homepage experience on Stack Overflow?

Hot Network Questions

• Can the brick opening for an exterior door be close to the same size as the door?
• Sitecore headless on local environment experience editor facing issue
• Consistency-proof of ZFC
• Paying a parking fine when I don't trust the recipient
• subtle racism in the lab
• Are there epistemic vices?
• Getting lost on a Circular Track
• How much could gravity increase before a military tank is crushed
• Humans are forbidden from using complex computers. But what defines a complex computer?
• How are you supposed to trust SSO popups in desktop and mobile applications?
• Flats on gravel with GP5000 - what am I doing wrong?
• How much does a ma'ah cost in £/$ in today's world?
• Overstaying knowing I have a new Schengen visa
• How would the following changes affect this monster's CR?
• Thread-safe write-efficient register() method for a Load balancer
• How to fold or expand the wingtips on Boeing 777?
• Can we use "day and night time" instead of "day and night"?
• Is there a name for this condition on monomorphisms?
• Why public key is taken in private key in Kyber KEM?
• What is the least number of colours Peter could use to color the 3x3 square?
• Mistake on car insurance policy about use of car (commuting/social)
• Inspector tells me that the electrician should have removed green screw from the panel
• Textile Innovations of Pachyderms: Clothing Type
• Board game where you built physical "bridges" to fish for resources from a pond