Subject (Humans incl. vulnerable populations, animals, environment)
It is crucial to recognize the purpose of an ethics code rather than just following it for ticking boxes. Understanding the aims and limitations of an ethics code will allow for a more meaningful application of the underlying principles to the specific context without ignoring the potential limitations of a study. Unintentional transgressions can occur through subconscious bias, fallacies, or human errors. However, the unintentional errors can be mitigated by following the streamlined process of research conception, method development and study conduct following approval from the Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), Ethical Research Commissions (ERCs), supervisors, and peers. In case of intentional errors, the punitive aspect needs to come into action and the transgressors might need to be investigated and sanctioned, either by the research organizations or by law.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are regarded as the highest level of evidence [ 26 , 27 ]. For both the cases (exercise vs. drug studies), RCTs primarily aim at investigating the dose-response relationships and obtaining causal relationships [ 28 ]. Drug trials compare one drug to other alternatives (e.g., another drug, a placebo, or a treatment as usual). Likewise, exercise trials often compare one mode of exercise to another exercise or no exercise interventions (e.g., usual care, waitlist control, true control, etc.), ideally under caloric, workload or time-matched conditions. However, placebo or sham trials are still rare in sports and exercise research due to their challenging nature [ 29 ]. The following quality requirements should be fulfilled for conducting high-quality exercise trials: (a) ensure blinding of assessors, participants and researchers; (b) placebo/sham intervention (if possible), and (c) adequate randomization and concealed allocation.
The term ‘blinding’ (or ‘masking’) involves keeping several involved key persons unaware of the group allocation, the treatment, or the hypothesis of a clinical trial [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ]. The term blinding and also the types of blinding (single, double, or triple blind) are being increasingly used and accepted by researchers but there is a lack of clarity and consistency in the interpretation of those terms [ 33 , 35 , 36 ]. Blinding should be conducted for participants, health care providers, coaches, outcome assessors, data analysts, etc. [ 31 , 33 , 34 , 37 ]. The blinding process helps in preventing bias due to differential treatment perceptions and expectations of the involved groups [ 28 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 38 , 39 , 40 ].
Previous research has shown that trials with inadequately reported methods [ 41 ] and non-blinded assessors [ 42 ] or participants [ 43 ] tend to overestimate the effects of intervention. Hence, blinding serves as an important prerequisite for controlling the methodological quality of a clinical trial, thereby reducing bias in assessed outcomes. Owing to this reason, most of the current methodological quality assessment tools and reporting checklists have dedicated sections for ‘blinding’. For example, three out of eleven items are meant for assessing ‘blinding’ in the PEDro scale [ 44 ]; the CONSORT checklist for improving the reporting of RCTs also includes a section on ‘blinding’ [ 45 ]. In an ideal trial, all participants involved in the study should be ‘blinded’ [ 30 ]. However, choosing whom to ‘blind’ also depends on and varies with the research question, study design and the research field under consideration. In the case of exercise trials, blinding is either not adequately done or poorly reported [ 36 , 46 ]. The lack of reporting might be the result of a lack of awareness of the blinding procedures rather than the poor methodological conduct of the trial itself [ 34 ]. Hence, blinding is not sufficiently addressed in exercise, medicine and psychology trials [ 47 , 48 ] due to lacking knowledge, awareness and guidance in these scientific fields leading to an increased risk of bias [ 48 ].
Blinding of participants is difficult to achieve and maintain [ 34 , 39 , 40 , 49 ] in exercise trials as the participants would usually be aware of whether they are in the exercise group or the control (inactive) group [ 31 , 39 , 50 ]. Likewise, the therapists are also generally aware of the interventions they are delivering [ 51 ], and the assessors are aware of the group allocation because it is common in sports sciences that researchers are involved in different parts of research (recruiting, assessment, allocation, training, data handling analysis) due to limited financial resources. Thus, the adequacy of blinding is usually not assessed as it is often seen as ’impossible’ in exercise trials.
Consequently, we strongly recommend using independent staff for testing, training, control and supervision to improve possibilities of blinding of the individuals involved in the study [ 39 ]. Researcher also need to decide if it is methodologically feasible and ethically acceptable to withhold the information about the hypothesis and the study aims [ 52 ] from assessors and participants. This needs to be considered, addressed and justified before the trial commences (i.e., a priori). While reporting methods of exercise trials, it is important not only to describe who was blinded but also to elaborate the methods used for blinding [ 33 , 48 ]. This helps the readers and research community to effectively evaluate the level of blinding in the trial under consideration [ 33 , 53 ]. Furthermore, if blinding was carried out, the authors can also include the assessment of success of the blinding procedure [ 33 , 54 ]. Readers can access more information about the various possibilities for blinding using the following link ( http://links.lww.com/PHM/A246 accessed on 10 October 2022) [ 36 ].
‘Placebo’ is an important research instrument used in pharmacology trials to demonstrate the true efficacy of a drug by minimizing therapy expectations of the participants [ 55 ]. As the term placebo is generally used in a broad manner, precise definitions are difficult. Placebo is used as a control therapy in clinical trials owing to their comparable appearance to the ‘real’ treatment without the specific therapeutic activity [ 56 ]. In an ideal research experiment, it would not be possible to differentiate between a placebo and an intervention treatment [ 57 , 58 ]. The participants should not be aware of the treatment group either, because it can lead to the knowledge of whether they received a placebo or the investigated drug [ 57 ]. A review of clinical trials comparing ‘no treatment’ to a ‘placebo treatment’ concluded that the placebo treatment had no significant additional effects overall but may produce relevant clinical effects on an individual level [ 59 ]. As outlined previously, the placebo effect is rarely investigated in sports and exercise studies. It is generally investigated using nutritional supplements, ergonomic aids, or various forms of therapy in the few existing studies [ 60 ]. Placebos have been shown to have a favorable effect on sports performance research [ 61 ], implying that these could be used for improving performance without using any additional performance-enhancing drugs [ 62 ].
However, it is quite difficult to have an adequate placebo in exercise intervention studies, as there is currently no standard placebo for structured exercise training [ 28 ]. For exercise training interventions, a placebo condition is defined as “an intervention that was not generally recognized as efficacious, that lacked adequate evidence for efficacy, and that has no direct pharmacological, biochemical, or physical mechanism of action according to the current standard of knowledge” [ 63 ]. As a result, using a placebo in exercise interventions is often seen as impractical and inefficient [ 57 , 58 ]. As the concept of blinding is also linked to the use of a placebo, it is usually difficult to implement in exercise trials.
When it comes to exercise experiments, an active control group is considered to be more effective than a placebo group [ 10 , 28 ]. In other cases, usual care or standard care can also be used as the control intervention [ 28 ]. In exercise trials, instead of using the term ‘placebo treatment’, the terms “placebo-like treatment” or “sham interventions” should be applied [ 64 , 65 ]. Previous recommendations by other researchers [ 61 ] also underpin our rationale.
Group allocation in a research study should be randomized and concealed by an independent researcher to minimize selection bias [ 66 ]. Randomization procedures ensure that the differences in treatment outcomes solely occur by chance [ 28 , 67 ]. Several methods for randomization are available; however, methods such as stratified randomization are being increasingly popular as they ensure equal distribution of participants to the different groups based on several important characteristics [ 66 ]. Other types of randomization, such as cluster randomization, may be appropriate when investigating larger groups, for example, in multicenter trials [ 28 ].
Since researchers are frequently involved in all phases of a trial (recruitment, allocation, assessment and data processing), randomization should usually be conducted by someone who is not familiar with the project’s aims and hypotheses. In studies with a large number of participants, the interaction between subjects and assessors can significantly impact the results [ 68 ]. The randomization procedure used in the clinical trial should be presented in scientific articles and project reports so that readers can understand and replicate the process if needed [ 66 ]. Based on the aforementioned aspects, exercise trials are not easily comparable to drug trials and the differences lead to difficulties in conducting scientifically conceptualized exercise trials. However, researchers should strive for quality research by using robust methods and providing detailed information on blinding, randomization, choice of control groups, or sham therapies, as appropriate. Researchers should critically evaluate the risk-benefit ratio of exercise so that the positive impacts of exercise on health can be derived and the cardiovascular risks associated with exercise could be minimized [ 69 ].
As previously described, ethical guidelines are needed to protect study participants from potential study risks and increase the chances of attaining results that ease interpretation. Therefore, a prospective ethical approval process is required prior to the recruitment of the participants [ 70 ]. This practice equally benefits the participants by safeguarding them against potential risks and the practitioners who base their clinical decisions on research results. Research results from a study with a strong methodology will enable informed and evidence-based decision making. If the methodology of a research project contains some major flaws, it will negatively affect the practical applicability of the observed results [ 71 ]. Various journal reviewers provide suggestions to reject manuscripts without any option to resubmit if no ethical approval information is provided. This demonstrates the importance of ethical approval and proper scientific conduct in research [ 70 ].
The following key elements need to be addressed in an ethical review proposal: Introduction, method, participant protection, and appendix. These key elements should be detailed in a proposal with at least three crucial characteristics addressed in each section ( Figure 1 ). This hands-on framework would help to expedite the process of decision-making for members of the ethics committee [ 72 ].
Overview 4 × 3 short list for outlining ethical approval in sport and exercise science.
The ‘introduction’ section should start with a general overview of the current state of research [ 4 ]. Researchers need to describe the rationale of the proposed study in an easy and comprehensible language considering the current state of knowledge on that topic [ 4 ]. The description helps to provide a balanced summary of the risks and benefits associated with the interventions in the proposed study. The novelty of the stated research question and the underlying hypothesis must be justified. If the proposed study fails to expand the current literature on the topic under consideration, conducting the study would be a ‘waste’ of time and financial resources for researchers, participants, and funding agencies [ 73 ]. Hence, ethical approvals should not be given for research projects that fail to provide novelty in the approach to the respective research area. The introduction should also include information on funding sources including the name of the funding partner, duration of monetary/resource support, and any potential conflicts of interest. If no funding is available, authors should declare that ‘This study received no funding’ [ 70 ].
The subsequent ‘methods’ section should include detailed information about the temporal and structural aspects of the study design. Researchers should justify the used study design in a detailed manner [ 4 , 28 ]. Multiple research designs can be utilized for addressing a specific research question, including experimental, quasi-experimental, and single-case trial designs [ 74 , 75 ]. However, a valid rationale should be provided for choosing a randomized cross-over trial design when the gold standard of randomized control trials is also feasible. Readers are advised to refer to the framework laid down by Hecksteden et al., 2018, for extensive information on this section [ 28 ]. Researchers should also provide a broad, global and up-to-date literature-based justification for their interventions or methods employed in the study. For instance, if the participants are asked to consume supplements, the recommendations for the dose needs to be explained based on prior high-quality studies and reviews for that supplement [ 4 ]. The criteria for subject selection (inclusion and exclusion criteria) and sample size estimation need to be explained in detail to allow replication of the study in the future [ 76 ]. Lacking sample size estimations is only acceptable in rare cases and requires detailed explanations (e.g., pilot trials, exploratory trials to formulate a hypothesis, acceptability trials). Moreover, sufficient details should be provided for the measuring devices used in the study and a sound rationale should be provided for the choice of that particular measuring device and the measured parameters [ 4 ].
The section on ‘participant protection’ deals with potential risks (physical and psychological adverse outcomes) and benefits to the participants. The focus should be adjusted to the study population under consideration. For example, while conducting a study on a novel weight training protocol with elite athletes, all information and possible effects on the athletes’ performance need to be considered, as their performance level is their ‘human capital’ [ 4 ]. The investigators also need to provide information on the individuals responsible for different parts of the study, i.e., treatment provider, outcome assessor, statistician, etc. In some cases, externally qualified personnel are needed during the examination process. For example, a physician might be needed for blood sampling or biopsies and this person should also be familiar with the regulations and procedures to avoid risk to the participants due to a lack of experience in this area. Prior experience and qualifications are required for conducting research with vulnerable groups, such as children, the elderly and pregnant females. Williams et al. (2011) summarized essential aspects of conducting research studies with younger participants [ 77 ]. Overall, the personnel should be blinded to the details of the group allocation and participants, if possible [ 30 ]. The study applicants also need to provide information about the planned compensation and the follow-up interventions. Harriss and colleagues suggested that the investigators are not expected to offer the treatments in case of injury to the participants during the study (except first aid) [ 70 ]. However, this recommendation is not usually documented and translated into research practice.
The ‘appendix’ section should contain relevant details about the following: consent, information to the participants and a declaration of pre-registration. The information to the participant and the consent forms need to be documented in an easy to understand language. A brief summary of the purpose of the study and the tasks to be performed by the participants should also be added. Then, a concise but comprehensive overview of the potential risks and benefits is needed. The next section should include information for participants: the participants’ right to decline participation without any consequence and the right to withdraw their consent at any time without any explanation. The regulations for the storage, sharing and retention of study data need to be detailed [ 70 ]. The names and institutional affiliations of all the researchers along with the contact information of the project manager should be listed. A brief overview of the study’s aim, tasks, methods and data acquisition strategies should be described. Finally, consent is needed for processing the recorded personal data [ 70 ]. The last section of the ‘appendix’ must include a declaration of pre-registration (e.g., registration in the Open Science Framework or trial registries) to avoid alterations in the procedure afterward and facilitate replication of study methods [ 78 ].
The process of conceptualizing an exercise trial might involve various pitfalls at every stage (hypothesis formulation, study design, methodology, data acquisition, data processing, statistical analysis, presentation and interpretation of results, etc.). Thus, the entire ‘design package’ needs to be considered when constructing an exercise (training) trial [ 28 ]. Formulation of an adequate and justified research question is the essential aspect before starting any research study. Formulating a good research question is pivotal to achieve adequate study quality [ 79 ]. According to Banerjee et al., 2009 [ 80 ], “a strong hypothesis serves the purpose of answering major part of the research question even before the study starts”. As outlined in previous sections, ethical research aspects must be taken into account while framing the research question to protect the privacy and reduce risks to the participants. The confidentiality of data should be ascertained and the participants should be free to withdraw from the study at any time. The authors should also avoid deceptive research practices [ 79 ].
Hecksteden et al., 2018, suggested that RCTs can be regarded as the gold standard for investigating the causal relationships in exercise trials [ 28 ]. However, it is sometimes not feasible to conduct RCTs in the field of sports science due to logistical issues, such as smaller sample sizes and blinding the location of the study (e.g., schools, colleges, clinics, etc.). In this case, alternative study designs such as cluster-RCTs, randomized crossover trials, N-of-1 trials, uncontrolled/non-randomized trials, and prospective cohort studies can be considered [ 81 ]. Considering the complex nature of exercise interventions, the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) has been developed to supplement the reporting and documentation of randomized exercise trials [ 81 ]. Adherence to these templates might help to improve the ethical proposal reporting standards when designing new RCTs.
A recent comment, in the journal ‘Nature’, highlights the importance of using the right statistical test and properly interpreting the results. According to the paper, the results of 51 percent of articles published in five peer-reviewed journals were misinterpreted [ 82 ]. Frequentist statistics and p -values are popular summaries of experimental results but there is a scope for misinterpretation due to the lack of supplementary information with these statistics. For instance, authors tend to draw inferences about the results of a study based on certain ‘ threshold p-values ’ (generally p < 0.05) [ 83 ]. However, with an increase in sample size, the p -value tends to come closer to zero regardless of the effect size of the intervention [ 83 ]. With the rise of larger datasets and thus potentially higher sample sizes, the p -value threshold becomes questionable. A call for action has recently been raised by more than 800 signatories to retire statistical significance and to stop categorizing results as being statistically significant or non-significant. Recently, researchers suggested using confidence intervals for improving the interpretation of study results [ 82 ]. Although alternative methods such as magnitude-based inference (MBI) exists, there is scarce evidence that MBI has checked the use of p -value and hypothesis testing by sports researchers [ 84 ]. MBI tends to reduce the type II error rate but it increases the type I error rate by about two to six times the rate of standard hypothesis testing [ 85 ]. In the next paragraphs, we focus on the commonly used practices within the frequentist statistics domain.
Frequentist statistical tests are categorized into parametric and non-parametric tests. Non-parametric tests do not require the data to be normally distributed, whereas parametric tests do [ 86 ]. The following factors help in deciding the appropriate statistical test: (a) type of dependent and independent variables (continuous, discrete, or ordinal); (b) type of distribution, if the groups are independent or matched; (c) levels of observations; and (d) time dependence. Readers can choose the right statistical tests based on the type of research data they are planning to use [ 87 , 88 ]. A recent publication outlined 25 common misinterpretations concerning p -values, confidence intervals, power calculations and key considerations while interpreting frequentist statistics [ 89 ]. We recommend sports researchers consider the listed warnings while interpreting the results of statistical tests.
Out of the various frequentist statistical methods, analysis of variances (ANOVA) is one of the most widely used tests to analyze the results of RCTs. It does not, however, provide an estimate of the difference between groups, which is usually the most important aspect of an RCT [ 90 ]. Linear models (e.g., t -tests) suffer from similar issues when analyzing categorical variables, which are a wider part of RCT analysis [ 91 ]. Type I errors (false positive, rejecting a null hypothesis that is correct) and Type II errors (false negative, failure to reject a false null hypothesis) are often discussed while interpreting RCT results [ 80 ]. Though it is not possible to completely eliminate these errors, there are ways to minimize their likelihood and report the statistics appropriately. The most commonly used methods for minimizing error rates include the following: (a) increasing the sample size; (b) adjusting for covariates and baseline differences [ 92 ]; (c) eliminating significance testing; and (d) reporting a confusion matrix [ 80 , 86 , 93 ].
Mixed logit models are potential solutions for some of the challenges listed above. They combine the advantages of random effects logistic regression analysis with the benefits of regression models [ 94 ]. In addition, mixed logit models, as part of the larger framework of generalized linear mixed models, provide a viable alternative for analyzing a wide range of outcomes. For increasing the transparency and interpretability of the observed results, mixed logit classification algorithms and evaluation matrices such as cross validation and presentation of a confusion matrix (type I and type II error rates) can be utilized [ 86 ]. Mixed logit models can also be utilized as predictive models rather just ‘inference testing’ models.
Despite extensive efforts to incorporate empirical and current evidence regarding good scientific practice and ethics into this paper, it is possible that some literature may have been omitted. Nonetheless, the paper comprehensively covers key aspects of prevalent ethical misconducts and the standards that should be upheld to prevent such practices. As a result, readers can have confidence in the literature presented, which is based on a substantial body of existing evidence. Readers are also encouraged to engage in critical evaluation and to consider new approaches that could improve the overall scientific literature.
We highlighted the various pitfalls and misconduct that can take place in sports and exercise research. Individual researchers associated with a research organization need to comply with the highest available standards. They need to maintain an intact ‘moral compass’ that is unaffected by expectations and environmental constraints thereby reducing the likelihood of unethical behavior for the sake of publication quantity, interpretability, applicability and societal trust in evidence-based decision-making. To achieve these objectives, a Health and Exercise Research Oath (HERO) could be developed that minimizes the allurement to cheat and could be used by PhD candidates, senior researchers, and professors. Such an oath would prevent intentional or unintentional malpractices in sport and exercise research, thereby strengthening the knowledge standards based on ethical exercise science research. Overall, this will also improve the applicability and interpretability of research outcomes.
We acknowledge the financial support of the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Open Access Publication Fund of Bielefeld University for the article processing charge.
This research received no external funding.
Conceptualization, N.K.A., G.R., S.C., A.P., B.K.L., A.N., P.W. and L.D.; methodology, N.K.A., G.R., S.C., A.P., B.K.L., A.N., P.W. and L.D.; resources, P.W. and L.D.; data curation, N.K.A., G.R., S.C., A.P., B.K.L., A.N., P.W. and L.D.; writing—original draft preparation, N.K.A., G.R., S.C., A.P., B.K.L., A.N., P.W. and L.D.; writing—review and editing, N.K.A., G.R., S.C., A.P., B.K.L., A.N., P.W. and L.D.; visualization, N.K.A., G.R., S.C., A.P., B.K.L., A.N., P.W. and L.D.; supervision, P.W. and L.D.; project administration, L.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Research in mice shows that exercise mobilizes inflammation-countering T cells, lowering levels of interferon — a key driver of chronic inflammation, inflammatory diseases, and aging.
Since ancient times, the health benefits of regular physical activity/exercise have been recognized and the classic studies of Morris and Paffenbarger provided the epidemiological evidence in support of such an association. Cardiorespiratory fitness, often measured by maximal oxygen uptake, and habitual physical activity levels are inversely related to mortality. Thus, studies exploring the ...
This overview of Cochrane systematic reviews evaluates the evidence for exercise/physical activity and various health outcomes. It suggests that exercise reduces mortality and improves quality of life.
Physical exercise influences physiological, psychological, and genetical changes, which results in producing various benefits, including preventing metabolic and mood disorders. Aerobic exercise benefits on physiology among sedentary adults have also been evaluated with genetic markers. One such study involved participants in a 30-min ...
Why is exercise good for you? Scientists are finding answers in our cells Decades of evidence shows that exercise leads to healthier, longer lives. Researchers are just starting to work out what ...
The field of exercise physiology has enjoyed tremendous growth in the past 40 years. With its foundations in the natural sciences, it is an interdisciplinary field that is highly relevant to human performance and health. The focus of this review is on highlighting new approaches, knowledge, and opportunities that have emerged in exercise ...
The article covered a wide range of topics such as: 1) emerging technologies and research initiatives; 2) new fields of research; 3) future funding trends and research priorities; 4) future challenges in exercise research-the building of a solid foundation; and 5) where the exercise sciences fit in health care.
The goal of this article is to provide a perspective on how research involving the acute and chronic effects of exercise (referred to as "exercise sciences") on the structure and function of organs systems will evolve in the next century. Within the last 30 years, exercise-related research has rapidly transitioned from an organ to a subcellular/molecular focus. Thus future research will ...
This Review highlights the beneficial adaptive responses to exercise in skeletal muscle and other tissues as well as their molecular mechanisms. In addition, the possibility of exercise-like ...
This collection brings together recent exercise research, highlighting technological advances in sport, and physiological adaptations to exercise.
Overwhelming evidence exists that lifelong exercise is associated with a longer health span, delaying the onset of 40 chronic conditions/diseases. What is beginning to be learned is the molecular mechanisms by which exercise sustains and improves quality of life. The current review begins with two s …
An appropriate response to an acute aerobic exercise stimulus requires robust and integrated physiological augmentation from the pulmonary, respiratory, skeletal muscle, and cardiovascular systems. Age, sex, and genetic predispositions influence the physiological response and therefore performance during aerobic exertion.
This paper summaries the progress of research on the application of exercise metabolomics in sports science, and looks forward to the future development of exercise metabolomics, with a view to providing new approaches and perspectives for improving human performance, promoting exercise against chronic diseases, and advancing sports science ...
The health benefits of exercise are well known but new research shows that the body's response to exercise is more complex and far-reaching than previously thought. In a study on rats, a team of ...
Read the latest articles of Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness at ScienceDirect.com, Elsevier's leading platform of peer-reviewed scholarly literature
Overwhelming evidence exists that lifelong exercise is associated with a longer health span, delaying the onset of 40 chronic conditions/diseases. What is beginning to be learned is the molecular mechanisms by which exercise sustains and improves quality ...
The article covered a wide range of topics such as the following: 1) emerging technologies and research initiatives, 2) new fields of research, 3) future funding trends and research priorities, 4) future challenges in exercise research-the building of a solid foundation, and 5) where the exercise sciences fit in health care.
Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews ( ESSR) , a quarterly review publication. ESSR provides premier, peer-reviewed reviews of contemporary scientific, medical and research-based topics emerging in the field of sports medicine and exercise science.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention touts exercise as a way to " boost brain health, " while the World Health Organization suggests that about 2 hours of moderate activity or 75 minutes of vigorous activity per week can help improve thinking and memory skills. But new research reveals a more complex picture.
Exercise for weight loss and its link to long life is explored in new research. Exercise carries many health benefits, independent of how much weight loss occurs.
In this manifesto, we make the case that Exercise Science can and must do more to improve the health of the public and the planet. Post pandemic, our vision for Exercise Science is one of a maturing scientific discipline reaching outwards from a base of strong empirical evidence to have a profound and sustained positive global impact on health.
2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Research studies investigating the effects of advanced resistance training techniques and methods on muscle hypertrophy and training variables were the primary focus of the literature search. Early screening of the articles was based on titles and abstracts.
Background Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects the physical and mental health in children and adolescents. Evidence suggests that participation in exercise may benefit children and adolescents with ADHD and enhance current and future physical and mental health. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the effects of exercise interventions on the physical and ...
The Department of Exercise Science houses several laboratories that support integrative research at the cellular, tissue, and whole organism level. Laboratories include: The Cardiovascular Laboratory: Conducts non-invasive assessment of vascular structure and function to explore the impact of exercise on emerging markers of cardiovascular ...
Sports and exercise training research is constantly evolving to maintain, improve, or regain psychophysical, social, and emotional performance. Exercise training research requires a balance between the benefits and the potential risks. There is an inherent ...