hypertension diagnosis case study

Newly diagnosed hypertension: case study

Affiliation.

1 Trainee Advanced Nurse Practitioner, East Belfast GP Federation, Northern Ireland.
PMID: 37344134
DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2023.32.12.556

The role of an advanced nurse practitioner encompasses the assessment, diagnosis and treatment of a range of conditions. This case study presents a patient with newly diagnosed hypertension. It demonstrates effective history taking, physical examination, differential diagnoses and the shared decision making which occurred between the patient and the professional. It is widely acknowledged that adherence to medications is poor in long-term conditions, such as hypertension, but using a concordant approach in practice can optimise patient outcomes. This case study outlines a concordant approach to consultations in clinical practice which can enhance adherence in long-term conditions.

Keywords: Adherence; Advanced nurse practitioner; Case study; Concordance; Hypertension.

Diagnosis, Differential
Hypertension* / diagnosis
Hypertension* / drug therapy
Nurse Practitioners*

This website is intended for healthcare professionals

{ $refs.search.focus(); })" aria-controls="searchpanel" :aria-expanded="open" class="hidden lg:inline-flex justify-end text-gray-800 hover:text-primary py-2 px-4 lg:px-0 items-center text-base font-medium"> Search

Search menu

Abegaz TM, Shehab A, Gebreyohannes EA, Bhagavathula AS, Elnour AA. Nonadherence to antihypertensive drugs. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96:(4) https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005641

Armitage LC, Davidson S, Mahdi A Diagnosing hypertension in primary care: a retrospective cohort study to investigate the importance of night-time blood pressure assessment. Br J Gen Pract. 2023; 73:(726)e16-e23 https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0160

Barratt J. Developing clinical reasoning and effective communication skills in advanced practice. Nurs Stand. 2018; 34:(2)48-53 https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.2018.e11109

Bostock-Cox B. Nurse prescribing for the management of hypertension. British Journal of Cardiac Nursing. 2013; 8:(11)531-536

Bostock-Cox B. Hypertension – the present and the future for diagnosis. Independent Nurse. 2019; 2019:(1)20-24 https://doi.org/10.12968/indn.2019.1.20

Chakrabarti S. What's in a name? Compliance, adherence and concordance in chronic psychiatric disorders. World J Psychiatry. 2014; 4:(2)30-36 https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v4.i2.30

De Mauri A, Carrera D, Vidali M Compliance, adherence and concordance differently predict the improvement of uremic and microbial toxins in chronic kidney disease on low protein diet. Nutrients. 2022; 14:(3) https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030487

Demosthenous N. Consultation skills: a personal reflection on history-taking and assessment in aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetic Nursing. 2017; 6:(9)460-464 https://doi.org/10.12968/joan.2017.6.9.460

Diamond-Fox S. Undertaking consultations and clinical assessments at advanced level. Br J Nurs. 2021; 30:(4)238-243 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2021.30.4.238

Diamond-Fox S, Bone H. Advanced practice: critical thinking and clinical reasoning. Br J Nurs. 2021; 30:(9)526-532 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2021.30.9.526

Donnelly M, Martin D. History taking and physical assessment in holistic palliative care. Br J Nurs. 2016; 25:(22)1250-1255 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2016.25.22.1250

Fawcett J. Thoughts about meanings of compliance, adherence, and concordance. Nurs Sci Q. 2020; 33:(4)358-360 https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318420943136

Fisher NDL, Curfman G. Hypertension—a public health challenge of global proportions. JAMA. 2018; 320:(17)1757-1759 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.16760

Green S. Assessment and management of acute sore throat. Pract Nurs. 2015; 26:(10)480-486 https://doi.org/10.12968/pnur.2015.26.10.480

Harper C, Ajao A. Pendleton's consultation model: assessing a patient. Br J Community Nurs. 2010; 15:(1)38-43 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2010.15.1.45784

Hitchings A, Lonsdale D, Burrage D, Baker E. The Top 100 Drugs; Clinical Pharmacology and Practical Prescribing, 2nd edn. Scotland: Elsevier; 2019

Hobden A. Strategies to promote concordance within consultations. Br J Community Nurs. 2006; 11:(7)286-289 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2006.11.7.21443

Ingram S. Taking a comprehensive health history: learning through practice and reflection. Br J Nurs. 2017; 26:(18)1033-1037 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2017.26.18.1033

James A, Holloway S. Application of concepts of concordance and health beliefs to individuals with pressure ulcers. British Journal of Healthcare Management. 2020; 26:(11)281-288 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2019.0104

Jamison J. Differential diagnosis for primary care. A handbook for health care practitioners, 2nd edn. China: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2006

History and Physical Examination. 2021. https://patient.info/doctor/history-and-physical-examination (accessed 26 January 2023)

Kumar P, Clark M. Clinical Medicine, 9th edn. The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2017

Matthys J, Elwyn G, Van Nuland M Patients' ideas, concerns, and expectations (ICE) in general practice: impact on prescribing. Br J Gen Pract. 2009; 59:(558)29-36 https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X394833

McKinnon J. The case for concordance: value and application in nursing practice. Br J Nurs. 2013; 22:(13)766-771 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2013.22.13.766

McPhillips H, Wood AF, Harper-McDonald B. Conducting a consultation and clinical assessment of the skin for advanced clinical practitioners. Br J Nurs. 2021; 30:(21)1232-1236 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2021.30.21.1232

Moulton L. The naked consultation; a practical guide to primary care consultation skills.Abingdon: Radcliffe Publishing; 2007

Medicine adherence; involving patients in decisions about prescribed medications and supporting adherence.England: NICE; 2009

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. How do I control my blood pressure? Lifestyle options and choice of medicines patient decision aid. 2019. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng136/resources/patient-decision-aid-pdf-6899918221 (accessed 25 January 2023)

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Hypertension in adults: diagnosis and management. NICE guideline NG136. 2022. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng136 (accessed 15 June 2023)

Nazarko L. Healthwise, Part 4. Hypertension: how to treat it and how to reduce its risks. Br J Healthc Assist. 2021; 15:(10)484-490 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjha.2021.15.10.484

Neighbour R. The inner consultation.London: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd; 1987

The Code. professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses, midwives and nursing associates.London: NMC; 2018

Nuttall D, Rutt-Howard J. The textbook of non-medical prescribing, 2nd edn. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2016

O'Donovan K. The role of ACE inhibitors in cardiovascular disease. British Journal of Cardiac Nursing. 2018; 13:(12)600-608 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjca.2018.13.12.600

O'Donovan K. Angiotensin receptor blockers as an alternative to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. British Journal of Cardiac Nursing. 2019; 14:(6)1-12 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjca.2019.0009

Porth CM. Essentials of Pathophysiology, 4th edn. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2015

Rae B. Obedience to collaboration: compliance, adherence and concordance. Journal of Prescribing Practice. 2021; 3:(6)235-240 https://doi.org/10.12968/jprp.2021.3.6.235

Rostoft S, van den Bos F, Pedersen R, Hamaker ME. Shared decision-making in older patients with cancer - What does the patient want?. J Geriatr Oncol. 2021; 12:(3)339-342 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2020.08.001

Schroeder K. The 10-minute clinical assessment, 2nd edn. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2017

Thomas J, Monaghan T. The Oxford handbook of clinical examination and practical skills, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014

Vincer K, Kaufman G. Balancing shared decision-making with ethical principles in optimising medicines. Nurse Prescribing. 2017; 15:(12)594-599 https://doi.org/10.12968/npre.2017.15.12.594

Waterfield J. ACE inhibitors: use, actions and prescribing rationale. Nurse Prescribing. 2008; 6:(3)110-114 https://doi.org/10.12968/npre.2008.6.3.28858

Weiss M. Concordance, 6th edn. In: Watson J, Cogan LS Poland: Elsevier; 2019

Williams H. An update on hypertension for nurse prescribers. Nurse Prescribing. 2013; 11:(2)70-75 https://doi.org/10.12968/npre.2013.11.2.70

Adherence to long-term therapies, evidence for action.Geneva: WHO; 2003

Young K, Franklin P, Franklin P. Effective consulting and historytaking skills for prescribing practice. Br J Nurs. 2009; 18:(17)1056-1061 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2009.18.17.44160

Newly diagnosed hypertension: case study

Angela Brown

Trainee Advanced Nurse Practitioner, East Belfast GP Federation, Northern Ireland

View articles · Email Angela

Hypertension is a worldwide problem with substantial consequences ( Fisher and Curfman, 2018 ). It is a progressive condition ( Jamison, 2006 ) requiring lifelong management with pharmacological treatments and lifestyle adjustments. However, adopting these lifestyle changes can be notoriously difficult to implement and sustain ( Fisher and Curfman, 2018 ) and non-adherence to chronic medication regimens is extremely common ( Abegaz et al, 2017 ). This is also recognised by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2009) which estimates that between 33.3% and 50% of medications are not taken as recommended. Abegaz et al (2017) furthered this by claiming 83.7% of people with uncontrolled hypertension do not take medications as prescribed. However, leaving hypertension untreated or uncontrolled is the single largest cause of cardiovascular disease ( Fisher and Curfman, 2018 ). Therefore, better adherence to medications is associated with better outcomes ( World Health Organization, 2003 ) in terms of reducing the financial burden associated with the disease process on the health service, improving outcomes for patients ( Chakrabarti, 2014 ) and increasing job satisfaction for professionals ( McKinnon, 2013 ). Therefore, at a time when growing numbers of patients are presenting with hypertension, health professionals must adopt a concordant approach from the initial consultation to optimise adherence.

Great emphasis is placed on optimising adherence to medications ( NICE, 2009 ), but the meaning of the term ‘adherence’ is not clear and it is sometimes used interchangeably with compliance and concordance ( De Mauri et al, 2022 ), although they are not synonyms. Compliance is an outdated term alluding to paternalism, obedience and passivity from the patient ( Rae, 2021 ), whereby the patient's behaviour must conform to the health professional's recommendations. Adherence is defined as ‘the extent to which a person's behaviour, taking medication, following a diet and/or executing lifestyle changes, corresponds with agreed recommendations from a health care provider’ ( Chakrabarti, 2014 ). This term is preferred over compliance as it is less paternalistic ( Rae, 2021 ), as the patient is included in the decision-making process and has agreed to the treatment plan. While it is not yet widely embraced or used in practice ( Fawcett, 2020 ), concordance is recognised, not as a behaviour ( Rae, 2021 ) but more an approach or method which focuses on the equal partnership between patient and professional ( McKinnon, 2013 ) and enables effective and agreed treatment plans.

NICE last reviewed its guidance on medication adherence in 2019 and did not replace adherence with concordance within this. This supports the theory that adherence is an outcome of good concordance and the two are not synonyms. NICE (2009) guidelines, which are still valid, show evidence of concordant principles to maximise adherence. Integrating the theoretical principles of concordance into this case study demonstrates how the trainee advanced nurse practitioner aimed to individualise patient-centred care and improve health outcomes through optimising adherence.

Patient introduction and assessment

Jane (a pseudonym has been used to protect the patient's anonymity; Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) 2018 ), is a 45-year-old woman who had been referred to the surgery following an attendance at an emergency department. Jane had been role-playing as a patient as part of a teaching session for health professionals when it was noted that her blood pressure was significantly elevated at 170/88 mmHg. She had no other symptoms. Following an initial assessment at the emergency department, Jane was advised to contact her GP surgery for review and follow up. Nazarko (2021) recognised that it is common for individuals with high blood pressure to be asymptomatic, contributing to this being referred to as the ‘silent killer’. Hypertension is generally only detected through opportunistic checking of blood pressure, as seen in Jane's case, which is why adults over the age of 40 years are offered a blood pressure check every 5 years ( Bostock-Cox, 2013 ).

Consultation

Jane presented for a consultation at the surgery. Green (2015) advocates using a model to provide a structured approach to consultations which ensures quality and safety, and improves time management. Young et al (2009) claimed that no single consultation model is perfect, and Diamond-Fox (2021) suggested that, with experience, professionals can combine models to optimise consultation outcomes. Therefore, to effectively consult with Jane and to adapt to her individual personality, different models were intertwined to provide better person-centred care.

The Calgary–Cambridge model is the only consultation model that places emphasis on initiating the session, despite it being recognised that if a consultation gets off to a bad start this can interfere throughout ( Young et al, 2009 ). Being prepared for the consultation is key. Before Jane's consultation, the environment was checked to minimise interruptions, ensuring privacy and dignity ( Green, 2015 ; NMC, 2018 ), the seating arrangements optimised to aid good body language and communication ( Diamond-Fox, 2021 ) and her records were viewed to give some background information to help set the scene and develop a rapport ( Young et al, 2009 ). Being adequately prepared builds the patient's trust and confidence in the professional ( Donnelly and Martin, 2016 ) but equally viewing patient information can lead to the professional forming preconceived ideas ( Donnelly and Martin, 2016 ). Therefore, care was taken by the trainee advanced nurse practitioner to remain open-minded.

During Jane's consultation, a thorough clinical history was taken ( Table 1 ). History taking is common to all consultation models and involves gathering important information ( Diamond-Fox, 2021 ). History-taking needs to be an effective ( Bostock-Cox, 2019 ), holistic process ( Harper and Ajao, 2010 ) in order to be thorough, safe ( Diamond-Fox, 2021 ) and aid in an accurate diagnosis. The key skill for taking history is listening and observing the patient ( Harper and Ajao, 2010 ). Sir William Osler said:‘listen to the patient as they are telling you the diagnosis’, but Knott and Tidy (2021) suggested that patients are barely given 20 seconds before being interrupted, after which they withdraw and do not offer any new information ( Demosthenous, 2017 ). Using this guidance, Jane was given the ‘golden minute’ allowing her to tell her ‘story’ without being interrupted ( Green, 2015 ). This not only showed respect ( Ingram, 2017 ) but interest in the patient and their concerns.

Once Jane shared her story, it was important for the trainee advanced nurse practitioner to guide the questioning ( Green 2015 ). This was achieved using a structured approach to take Jane's history, which optimised efficiency and effectiveness, and ensured that pertinent information was not omitted ( Young et al, 2009 ). Thomas and Monaghan (2014) set out clear headings for this purpose. These included:

The presenting complaint
Past medical history
Drug history
Social history
Family history.

McPhillips et al (2021) also emphasised a need for a systemic enquiry of the other body systems to ensure nothing is missed. From taking this history it was discovered that Jane had been feeling well with no associated symptoms or red flags. A blood pressure reading showed that her blood pressure was elevated. Jane had no past medical history or allergies. She was not taking any medications, including prescribed, over the counter, herbal or recreational. Jane confirmed that she did not drink alcohol or smoke. There was no family history to note, which is important to clarify as a genetic link to hypertension could account for 30–50% of cases ( Nazarko, 2021 ). The information gathered was summarised back to Jane, showing good practice ( McPhillips et al, 2021 ), and Jane was able to clarify salient or missing points. Green (2015) suggested that optimising the patient's involvement in this way in the consultation makes her feel listened to which enhances patient satisfaction, develops a therapeutic relationship and demonstrates concordance.

During history taking it is important to explore the patient's ideas, concerns and expectations. Moulton (2007) refers to these as the ‘holy trinity’ and central to upholding person-centredness ( Matthys et al, 2009 ). Giving Jane time to discuss her ideas, concerns and expectations allowed the trainee advanced nurse practitioner to understand that she was concerned about her risk of a stroke and heart attack, and worried about the implications of hypertension on her already stressful job. Using ideas, concerns and expectations helped to understand Jane's experience, attitudes and perceptions, which ultimately will impact on her health behaviours and whether engagement in treatment options is likely ( James and Holloway, 2020 ). Establishing Jane's views demonstrated that she was eager to engage and manage her blood pressure more effectively.

Vincer and Kaufman (2017) demonstrated, through their case study, that a failure to ask their patient's viewpoint at the initial consultation meant a delay in engagement with treatment. They recognised that this delay could have been avoided with the use of additional strategies had ideas, concerns and expectations been implemented. Failure to implement ideas, concerns and expectations is also associated with reattendance or the patient seeking second opinions ( Green, 2015 ) but more positively, when ideas, concerns and expectations is implemented, it can reduce the number of prescriptions while sustaining patient satisfaction ( Matthys et al, 2009 ).

Physical examination

Once a comprehensive history was taken, a physical examination was undertaken to supplement this information ( Nuttall and Rutt-Howard, 2016 ). A physical examination of all the body systems is not required ( Diamond-Fox, 2021 ) as this would be extremely time consuming, but the trainee advanced nurse practitioner needed to carefully select which systems to examine and use good examination technique to yield a correct diagnosis ( Knott and Tidy, 2021 ). With informed consent, clinical observations were recorded along with a full cardiovascular examination. The only abnormality discovered was Jane's blood pressure which was 164/90 mmHg, which could suggest stage 2 hypertension ( NICE, 2019 ; 2022 ). However, it is the trainee advanced nurse practitioner's role to use a hypothetico-deductive approach to arrive at a diagnosis. This requires synthesising all the information from the history taking and physical examination to formulate differential diagnoses ( Green, 2015 ) from which to confirm or refute before arriving at a final diagnosis ( Barratt, 2018 ).

Differential diagnosis

Hypertension can be triggered by secondary causes such as certain drugs (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, steroids, decongestants, sodium-containing medications or combined oral contraception), foods (liquorice, alcohol or caffeine; Jamison, 2006 ), physiological response (pain, anxiety or stress) or pre-eclampsia ( Jamison, 2006 ; Schroeder, 2017 ). However, Jane had clarified that these were not contributing factors. Other potential differentials which could not be ruled out were the white-coat syndrome, renal disease or hyperthyroidism ( Schroeder, 2017 ). Further tests were required, which included bloods, urine albumin creatinine ratio, electrocardiogram and home blood pressure monitoring, to ensure a correct diagnosis and identify any target organ damage.

Joint decision making

At this point, the trainee advanced nurse practitioner needed to share their knowledge in a meaningful way to enable the patient to participate with and be involved in making decisions about their care ( Rostoft et al, 2021 ). Not all patients wish to be involved in decision making ( Hobden, 2006 ) and this must be respected ( NMC, 2018 ). However, engaging patients in partnership working improves health outcomes ( McKinnon, 2013 ). Explaining the options available requires skill so as not to make the professional seem incompetent and to ensure the patient continues to feel safe ( Rostoft et al, 2021 ).

Information supported by the NICE guidelines was shared with Jane. These guidelines advocated that in order to confirm a diagnosis of hypertension, a clinic blood pressure reading of 140/90 mmHg or higher was required, with either an ambulatory or home blood pressure monitoring result of 135/85 mmHg or higher ( NICE, 2019 ; 2022 ). However, the results from a new retrospective study suggested that the use of home blood pressure monitoring is failing to detect ‘non-dippers’ or ‘reverse dippers’ ( Armitage et al, 2023 ). These are patients whose blood pressure fails to fall during their nighttime sleep. This places them at greater risk of cardiovascular disease and misdiagnosis if home blood pressure monitors are used, but ambulatory blood pressure monitors are less frequently used in primary care and therefore home blood pressure monitors appear to be the new norm ( Armitage et al, 2023 ).

Having discussed this with Jane she was keen to engage with home blood pressure monitoring in order to confirm the potential diagnosis, as starting a medication without a true diagnosis of hypertension could potentially cause harm ( Jamison, 2006 ). An accurate blood pressure measurement is needed to prevent misdiagnosis and unnecessary therapy ( Jamison, 2006 ) and this is dependent on reliable and calibrated equipment and competency in performing the task ( Bostock-Cox, 2013 ). Therefore, Jane was given education and training to ensure the validity and reliability of her blood pressure readings.

For Jane, this consultation was the ideal time to offer health promotion advice ( Green, 2015 ) as she was particularly worried about her elevated blood pressure. Offering health promotion advice is a way of caring, showing support and empowerment ( Ingram, 2017 ). Therefore, Jane was provided with information on a healthy diet, the reduction of salt intake, weight loss, exercise and continuing to abstain from smoking and alcohol ( Williams, 2013 ). These were all modifiable factors which Jane could implement straight away to reduce her blood pressure.

Safety netting

The final stage and bringing this consultation to a close was based on the fourth stage of Neighbour's (1987) model, which is safety netting. Safety netting identifies appropriate follow up and gives details to the patient on what to do if their condition changes ( Weiss, 2019 ). It is important that the patient knows who to contact and when ( Young et al, 2009 ). Therefore, Jane was advised that, should she develop chest pains, shortness of breath, peripheral oedema, reduced urinary output, headaches, visual disturbances or retinal haemorrhages ( Schroeder, 2017 ), she should present immediately to the emergency department, otherwise she would be reviewed in the surgery in 1 week.

Jane was followed up in a second consultation 1 week later with her home blood pressure readings. The average reading from the previous 6 days was calculated ( Bostock-Cox, 2013 ) and Jane's home blood pressure reading was 158/82 mmHg. This reading ruled out white-coat syndrome as Jane's blood pressure remained elevated outside clinic conditions (white-coat syndrome is defined as a difference of more than 20/10 mmHg between clinic blood pressure readings and the average home blood pressure reading; NICE, 2019 ; 2022 ). Subsequently, Jane was diagnosed with stage 2 essential (or primary) hypertension. Stage 2 is defined as a clinic blood pressure of 160/100 mmHg or higher or a home blood pressure of 150/95 mmHg or higher ( NICE, 2019 ; 2022 ).

A diagnosis of hypertension can be difficult for patients as they obtain a ‘sick label’ despite feeling well ( Jamison, 2006 ). This is recognised as a deterrent for their motivation to initiate drug treatment and lifestyle changes ( Williams, 2013 ), presenting a greater challenge to health professionals, which can be addressed through concordance strategies. However, having taken Jane's bloods, electrocardiogram and urine albumin:creatinine ratio in the first consultation, it was evident that there was no target organ damage and her Qrisk3 score was calculated as 3.4%. These results provided reassurance for Jane, but she was keen to engage and prevent any potential complications.

Agreeing treatment

Concordance is only truly practised when the patient's perspectives are valued, shared and used to inform planning ( McKinnon, 2013 ). The trainee advanced nurse practitioner now needed to use the information gained from the consultations to formulate a co-produced and meaningful treatment plan based on the best available evidence ( Diamond-Fox and Bone, 2021 ). Jane understood the risk associated with high blood pressure and was keen to begin medication as soon as possible. NICE guidelines ( 2019 ; 2022 ) advocate the use of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blockers in patients under 55 years of age and not of Black African or African-Caribbean origin. However, ACE inhibitors seem to be used as the first-line treatment for hypertensive patients under the age of 55 years ( O'Donovan, 2019 ).

ACE inhibitors directly affect the renin–angiotensin-aldosterone system which plays a central role in regulation of blood pressure ( Porth, 2015 ). Renin is secreted by the juxtaglomerular cells, in the kidneys' nephrons, when there is a decrease in renal perfusion and stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system ( O'Donovan, 2018 ). Renin then combines with angiotensinogen, a circulating plasma globulin from the liver, to form angiotensin I ( Kumar and Clark, 2017 ). Angiotensin I is inactive but, through ACE, an enzyme present in the endothelium of the lungs, it is transformed into angiotensin II ( Kumar and Clark, 2017 ). Angiotensin II is a vasoconstrictor which increases vascular resistance and in turn blood pressure ( Porth, 2015 ) while also stimulating the adrenal gland to produce aldosterone. Aldosterone reduces sodium excretion in the kidneys, thus increasing water reabsorption and therefore blood volume ( Porth, 2015 ). Using an ACE inhibitor prevents angiotensin II formation, which prevents vasoconstriction and stops reabsorption of sodium and water, thus reducing blood pressure.

When any new medication is being considered, providing education is key. This must include what the medication is for, the importance of taking it, any contraindications or interactions with the current medications being taken by the patient and the potential risk of adverse effects ( O'Donovan, 2018 ). Sharing this information with Jane allowed her to weigh up the pros and cons and make an informed choice leading to the creation of an individualised treatment plan.

Jamison (2006) placed great emphasis on sharing information about adverse effects, because patients with hypertension feel well before commencing medications, but taking medication has the potential to cause side effects which can affect adherence. Therefore, the range of side effects were discussed with Jane. These include a persistent, dry non-productive cough, hypotension, hypersensitivity, angioedema and renal impairment with hyperkalaemia ( Hitchings et al, 2019 ). ACE inhibitors have a range of adverse effects and most resolve when treatment is stopped ( Waterfield, 2008 ).

Following discussion with Jane, she proceeded with taking an ACE inhibitor and was encouraged to report any side effects in order to find another more suitable medication and to prevent her hypertension from going untreated. This information was provided verbally and written which is seen as good practice ( Green, 2015 ). Jane was followed up with fortnightly blood pressure recordings and urea and electrolyte checks and her dose of ramipril was increased fortnightly until her blood pressure was under 140/90 mmHg ( NICE, 2019 ; 2022 ).

Conclusions

Adherence to medications can be difficult to establish and maintain, especially for patients with long-term conditions. This can be particularly challenging for patients with hypertension because they are generally asymptomatic, yet acquire a sick label and start lifelong medication and lifestyle adjustments to prevent complications. Through adopting a concordant approach in practice, the outcome of adherence can be increased. This case study demonstrates how concordant strategies were implemented throughout the consultation to create a therapeutic patient–professional relationship. This optimised the creation of an individualised treatment plan which the patient engaged with and adhered to.

Hypertension is a growing worldwide problem
Appropriate clinical assessment, diagnosis and management is key to prevent misdiagnosis
Long-term conditions are associated with high levels of non-adherence to treatments
Adopting a concordance approach to practice optimises adherence and promotes positive patient outcomes

CPD reflective questions

How has this article developed your assessment, diagnosis or management of patients presenting with a high blood pressure?
What measures can you implement in your practice to enhance a concordant approach?

Register-org
Subscriptions

Search Engine

Hypertension (Case 7)

Published on 24/06/2015 by admin

Filed under Internal Medicine

Last modified 24/06/2015

This article have been viewed 7007 times

Elie R. Chemaly MD, MSc and Michael Kim MD

Case: A 59-year-old African-American woman is referred by her primary physician. She has had a history of severe hypertension for 38 years. She complains of dizziness, occipital headaches with blurred vision, and palpitations correlated with high BP sometimes reaching 200 mm Hg systolic and 120 mm Hg diastolic. She also has claudication of the legs and thighs upon walking four street blocks. She has a history of thyroid disease and is presently hypothyroid. Her medications on presentation were valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide 320 mg/25 mg (one tablet daily in the morning), clonidine 0.3 mg (one tablet daily in the evening), verapamil SR 240 mg (one tablet twice a day), and levothyroxine 0.1 mg (one tablet daily). Although she takes her medications each day as directed, she confides to you that she is concerned that they are becoming increasingly difficult for her to afford on a limited budget. She has an extensive family history of hypertension, and her father died at the age of 57 years in his sleep. On examination she weighs 68 kg, her pulse is 60 bpm, and her BP is 148/88 mm Hg. Her examination is remarkable for bilateral femoral bruits.

Differential Diagnosis

Speaking Intelligently

The first assessment when approaching the hypertensive patient is to classify the patient based on the following:

1. The arterial BP measurements

2. The acuteness of the problem

3. The status of the patient in terms of antihypertensive therapy

4. The cause of hypertension in the patient: essential vs. secondary. In acute settings, BP elevation may be an appropriate response to stress such as hypoxia, hypercapnia, hypoxemia, or even intracranial hypertension (the Cushing response of hypertension and bradycardia).

PATIENT CARE

Clinical thinking.

• The definition of hypertension is an operational definition, which means that a BP is considered to be in the hypertensive range when it requires treatment to lower it, not just when it is above the number considered to be normal, and such treatment is required when the benefit of therapy outweighs the risk of therapy. This explains the changes in the definition of hypertension over the course of the years, motivated by treatment availability and data on treatment benefit and treatment targets.

• The seventh report of the Joint National Committee (JNC 7), published in 2003, has issued those definitions. 1 Based upon the average of two or more BP readings at each of two or more visits after an initial screen, the following classification is used:

• Normal blood pressure: systolic less than 120 mm Hg and diastolic less than 80 mm Hg

• Prehypertension: systolic 120 to 139 mm Hg or diastolic 80 to 89 mm Hg

• Hypertension:

Stage 1: systolic 140 to 159 mm Hg or diastolic 90 to 99 mm Hg

Stage 2: systolic ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic ≥100 mm Hg

• It is not the same thing to have hypertension and to have a BP that is not normal. The normal BP definition comes from studies recognizing a continuous rise in the risk of hypertension complications starting at a BP over 110/75 mm Hg (mainly cardiovascular morbidity and mortality).

• These definitions apply to adults on no antihypertensive medications and who are not acutely ill. If there is a disparity in category between the systolic and diastolic pressures, the higher value determines the severity of the hypertension. The systolic pressure is the greater predictor of risk in patients over the age of 50 to 60 years. Also, systolic blood pressure (SBP) is measured more reliably than diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and classifies most patients. Isolated systolic hypertension is common in elderly patients; younger hypertensive patients tend to have elevations of both SBP and DBP. An isolated elevation of the DBP is much less common.

• I need to know if the patient, especially in the acute setting, is presenting with malignant hypertension, hypertensive emergency, or hypertensive urgency.

• If the patient is already receiving antihypertensive therapy, the diagnosis of hypertension is made. I need to assess the particular therapeutic goal for the BP of this patient, since BP treatment goals vary from patient to patient (see JNC 7 report 1 ) and the appropriateness of the treatment.

• The decision to search for a secondary cause of hypertension and/or poor BP control is made on a case-by-case basis.

The history should search for precipitating or aggravating factors as well as an identifiable cause (secondary hypertension), establish the course of the disease, assess the extent of target organ damage, and look for other risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

• Duration and course of the disease

• Prior treatment, response, tolerance, and compliance. Noncompliance with treatment is an important cause of poor BP control.

• Medications, diet, and social history: Drugs that may aggravate or cause hypertension include sympathomimetics, steroids, NSAIDs, and estrogens; psychiatric medications causing a serotonin syndrome; cocaine and alcohol abuse. Withdrawal syndromes and rebound effects also need to be considered: alcohol, benzodiazepines, β-blockers, and clonidine.

• Family history

• Comorbidities, especially diabetes; diseases that can be secondary causes of hypertension (e.g., kidney disease); other cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., tobacco).

• Symptoms of sleep apnea: early-morning headaches, daytime somnolence, snoring, erratic sleep.

• Symptoms of severe hypertension, end-organ damage, or volume overload: epistaxis, headache, visual disturbances, neurologic deficits, dyspnea, chest pain, syncope, claudication.

• Symptoms suggestive of a secondary cause: headaches, sweating, tremor, tachycardia/palpitations, muscle weakness, and skin symptoms.

Physical Examination

• Proper measurement of BP: Away from stressors, with an appropriate cuff size, use Korotkoff phase V for auscultatory DBP. Korotkoff phase V is when the sounds disappear; one can use phase IV when they muffle if they do not disappear until a BP of 0 mm Hg. SBP, measured by auscultation, can and should also be measured through the radial pulse: when the cuff is inflated above the SBP, the radial pulse disappears. This maneuver allows the assessment of auscultatory gap (a stiff artery that does not oscillate and leads to an auscultatory underestimation of SBP) and pseudo-hypertension (a stiff artery not compressed by the cuff; SBP is overestimated). In selected settings, BP should be measured in both arms (especially in the younger patient to assess for coarctation of the aorta). Measurements should be repeated at different visits, unless BP is markedly elevated, before treatment.

• Vital signs , in particular heart rate in relationship to BP and treatments already taken. It may be important, especially in the acute setting, to know if the patient is febrile or hypoxic. Mental status is an important vital sign in the acute setting (hypertensive emergencies and urgencies).

• General appearance: body fat, skin (cutaneous manifestations of endocrinopathies causing secondary hypertension).

• Funduscopic examination to evaluate retinal complications.

• Thyroid examination.

• Cardiac auscultation (for murmurs and abnormal sounds: An S 4 gallop may indicate the stiff left ventricle of hypertensive heart disease).

• Vascular auscultation (carotid bruits, renal bruits, pulses): to assess atherosclerotic status and the presence of renal artery stenosis; the relationship between carotid artery disease, its treatment, and hypertension is not well understood.

• Abdominal examination , especially of the aorta and the kidneys.

• Neurologic examination , if applicable.