A descriptive study is one in which information is collected without changing the environment (i.e., nothing is manipulated). Sometimes these are referred to as correlational or observational studies. The Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP) defines a descriptive study as Any study that is not truly experimental. In human research, a descriptive study can provide information about the naturally occurring health status, behavior, attitudes or other characteristics of a particular group. Descriptive studies are also conducted to demonstrate or relationships between things in the world around you. Descriptive studies can involve a one-time interaction with groups of people ( ) or a study might follow individuals over time ( ). Descriptive studies, in which the researcher interacts with the participant, may involve surveys or interviews to collect the necessary information. Descriptive studies in which the researcher does not interact with the participant include observational studies of people in an environment and studies involving data collection using existing records (e.g., medical record review). Descriptive studies are usually the best methods for collecting information that will demonstrate relationships and describe the world as it exists. These types of studies are often done before an experiment to know what specific things to manipulate and include in an experiment. Bickman and Rog (1998) suggest that descriptive studies can answer questions such as “what is” or “what was.” Experiments can typically answer “why” or “how.” | Which Descriptive Research Technique Is Correctly Matched with a DescriptionQuestion 111 Which descriptive research technique is correctly matched with a description? A) survey - Participants are systematically studied in their natural environment. B) case study - A single individual or group is examined in detail. C) naturalistic observation - Questionnaires or interviews are used to probe behavior or attitudes. D) All of these choices are correctly matched. Correct Answer: Unlock this answer now Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge. Q29: Which sequence BEST reflects the order of Q74: Which of the following statements BEST expresses Q106: At a DUI checkpoint, some cars are Q107: A sample whose characteristics are the same Q109: Dr. O'Connor is telling his participants before Q110: Naturalistic observation entails: A)the systematic, detailed study of Q112: Amy is conducting a survey of dating Q113: Which of the following is a component Q114: Which sequence arranges the concepts in order Q116: Dr. O'Malley is telling his participants before Unlock this Answer For Free Now! View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions ![descriptive research includes all of these except quizlet qr-code](https://quizplus.com/assets/images/visitor-actions/qr-code) Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks ![descriptive research includes all of these except quizlet upload documents](https://quizplus.com/assets/images/visitor-actions/upload-document) Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents ![descriptive research includes all of these except quizlet Logo for BCcampus Open Publishing](https://opentextbc.ca/introductiontopsychology/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/cropped-BCcampus-logo-colour.png) Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices. Chapter 3. Psychological Science 3.2 Psychologists Use Descriptive, Correlational, and Experimental Research Designs to Understand BehaviourLearning objectives. - Differentiate the goals of descriptive, correlational, and experimental research designs and explain the advantages and disadvantages of each.
- Explain the goals of descriptive research and the statistical techniques used to interpret it.
- Summarize the uses of correlational research and describe why correlational research cannot be used to infer causality.
- Review the procedures of experimental research and explain how it can be used to draw causal inferences.
Psychologists agree that if their ideas and theories about human behaviour are to be taken seriously, they must be backed up by data. However, the research of different psychologists is designed with different goals in mind, and the different goals require different approaches. These varying approaches, summarized in Table 3.2, are known as research designs . A research design is the specific method a researcher uses to collect, analyze, and interpret data . Psychologists use three major types of research designs in their research, and each provides an essential avenue for scientific investigation. Descriptive research is research designed to provide a snapshot of the current state of affairs . Correlational research is research designed to discover relationships among variables and to allow the prediction of future events from present knowledge . Experimental research is research in which initial equivalence among research participants in more than one group is created, followed by a manipulation of a given experience for these groups and a measurement of the influence of the manipulation . Each of the three research designs varies according to its strengths and limitations, and it is important to understand how each differs. Table 3.2 Characteristics of the Three Research Designs | Research design | Goal | Advantages | Disadvantages | Descriptive | To create a snapshot of the current state of affairs | Provides a relatively complete picture of what is occurring at a given time. Allows the development of questions for further study. | Does not assess relationships among variables. May be unethical if participants do not know they are being observed. | Correlational | To assess the relationships between and among two or more variables | Allows testing of expected relationships between and among variables and the making of predictions. Can assess these relationships in everyday life events. | Cannot be used to draw inferences about the causal relationships between and among the variables. | Experimental | To assess the causal impact of one or more experimental manipulations on a dependent variable | Allows drawing of conclusions about the causal relationships among variables. | Cannot experimentally manipulate many important variables. May be expensive and time consuming. | Source: Stangor, 2011. | Descriptive Research: Assessing the Current State of AffairsDescriptive research is designed to create a snapshot of the current thoughts, feelings, or behaviour of individuals. This section reviews three types of descriptive research : case studies , surveys , and naturalistic observation (Figure 3.4). Sometimes the data in a descriptive research project are based on only a small set of individuals, often only one person or a single small group. These research designs are known as case studies — descriptive records of one or more individual’s experiences and behaviour . Sometimes case studies involve ordinary individuals, as when developmental psychologist Jean Piaget used his observation of his own children to develop his stage theory of cognitive development. More frequently, case studies are conducted on individuals who have unusual or abnormal experiences or characteristics or who find themselves in particularly difficult or stressful situations. The assumption is that by carefully studying individuals who are socially marginal, who are experiencing unusual situations, or who are going through a difficult phase in their lives, we can learn something about human nature. Sigmund Freud was a master of using the psychological difficulties of individuals to draw conclusions about basic psychological processes. Freud wrote case studies of some of his most interesting patients and used these careful examinations to develop his important theories of personality. One classic example is Freud’s description of “Little Hans,” a child whose fear of horses the psychoanalyst interpreted in terms of repressed sexual impulses and the Oedipus complex (Freud, 1909/1964). Another well-known case study is Phineas Gage, a man whose thoughts and emotions were extensively studied by cognitive psychologists after a railroad spike was blasted through his skull in an accident. Although there are questions about the interpretation of this case study (Kotowicz, 2007), it did provide early evidence that the brain’s frontal lobe is involved in emotion and morality (Damasio et al., 2005). An interesting example of a case study in clinical psychology is described by Rokeach (1964), who investigated in detail the beliefs of and interactions among three patients with schizophrenia, all of whom were convinced they were Jesus Christ. In other cases the data from descriptive research projects come in the form of a survey — a measure administered through either an interview or a written questionnaire to get a picture of the beliefs or behaviours of a sample of people of interest . The people chosen to participate in the research (known as the sample) are selected to be representative of all the people that the researcher wishes to know about (the population). In election polls, for instance, a sample is taken from the population of all “likely voters” in the upcoming elections. The results of surveys may sometimes be rather mundane, such as “Nine out of 10 doctors prefer Tymenocin” or “The median income in the city of Hamilton is $46,712.” Yet other times (particularly in discussions of social behaviour), the results can be shocking: “More than 40,000 people are killed by gunfire in the United States every year” or “More than 60% of women between the ages of 50 and 60 suffer from depression.” Descriptive research is frequently used by psychologists to get an estimate of the prevalence (or incidence ) of psychological disorders. A final type of descriptive research — known as naturalistic observation — is research based on the observation of everyday events . For instance, a developmental psychologist who watches children on a playground and describes what they say to each other while they play is conducting descriptive research, as is a biopsychologist who observes animals in their natural habitats. One example of observational research involves a systematic procedure known as the strange situation , used to get a picture of how adults and young children interact. The data that are collected in the strange situation are systematically coded in a coding sheet such as that shown in Table 3.3. Table 3.3 Sample Coding Form Used to Assess Child’s and Mother’s Behaviour in the Strange Situation | Coder name: | This table represents a sample coding sheet from an episode of the “strange situation,” in which an infant (usually about one year old) is observed playing in a room with two adults — the child’s mother and a stranger. Each of the four coding categories is scored by the coder from 1 (the baby makes no effort to engage in the behaviour) to 7 (the baby makes a significant effort to engage in the behaviour). More information about the meaning of the coding can be found in Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, and Wall (1978). | Coding categories explained | Proximity | The baby moves toward, grasps, or climbs on the adult. | Maintaining contact | The baby resists being put down by the adult by crying or trying to climb back up. | Resistance | The baby pushes, hits, or squirms to be put down from the adult’s arms. | Avoidance | The baby turns away or moves away from the adult. | Episode | Coding categories | Proximity | Contact | Resistance | Avoidance | Mother and baby play alone | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Mother puts baby down | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Stranger enters room | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | Mother leaves room; stranger plays with baby | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | Mother re-enters, greets and may comfort baby, then leaves again | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | Stranger tries to play with baby | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | Mother re-enters and picks up baby | 6 | 6 | 1 | 2 | Source: Stang0r, 2011. | The results of descriptive research projects are analyzed using descriptive statistics — numbers that summarize the distribution of scores on a measured variable . Most variables have distributions similar to that shown in Figure 3.5 where most of the scores are located near the centre of the distribution, and the distribution is symmetrical and bell-shaped. A data distribution that is shaped like a bell is known as a normal distribution . A distribution can be described in terms of its central tendency — that is, the point in the distribution around which the data are centred — and its dispersion, or spread . The arithmetic average, or arithmetic mean , symbolized by the letter M , is the most commonly used measure of central tendency . It is computed by calculating the sum of all the scores of the variable and dividing this sum by the number of participants in the distribution (denoted by the letter N ). In the data presented in Figure 3.5 the mean height of the students is 67.12 inches (170.5 cm). The sample mean is usually indicated by the letter M . In some cases, however, the data distribution is not symmetrical. This occurs when there are one or more extreme scores (known as outliers ) at one end of the distribution. Consider, for instance, the variable of family income (see Figure 3.6), which includes an outlier (a value of $3,800,000). In this case the mean is not a good measure of central tendency. Although it appears from Figure 3.6 that the central tendency of the family income variable should be around $70,000, the mean family income is actually $223,960. The single very extreme income has a disproportionate impact on the mean, resulting in a value that does not well represent the central tendency. The median is used as an alternative measure of central tendency when distributions are not symmetrical. The median is the score in the center of the distribution, meaning that 50% of the scores are greater than the median and 50% of the scores are less than the median . In our case, the median household income ($73,000) is a much better indication of central tendency than is the mean household income ($223,960). A final measure of central tendency, known as the mode , represents the value that occurs most frequently in the distribution . You can see from Figure 3.6 that the mode for the family income variable is $93,000 (it occurs four times). In addition to summarizing the central tendency of a distribution, descriptive statistics convey information about how the scores of the variable are spread around the central tendency. Dispersion refers to the extent to which the scores are all tightly clustered around the central tendency , as seen in Figure 3.7. Or they may be more spread out away from it, as seen in Figure 3.8. One simple measure of dispersion is to find the largest (the maximum ) and the smallest (the minimum ) observed values of the variable and to compute the range of the variable as the maximum observed score minus the minimum observed score. You can check that the range of the height variable in Figure 3.5 is 72 – 62 = 10. The standard deviation , symbolized as s , is the most commonly used measure of dispersion . Distributions with a larger standard deviation have more spread. The standard deviation of the height variable is s = 2.74, and the standard deviation of the family income variable is s = $745,337. An advantage of descriptive research is that it attempts to capture the complexity of everyday behaviour. Case studies provide detailed information about a single person or a small group of people, surveys capture the thoughts or reported behaviours of a large population of people, and naturalistic observation objectively records the behaviour of people or animals as it occurs naturally. Thus descriptive research is used to provide a relatively complete understanding of what is currently happening. Despite these advantages, descriptive research has a distinct disadvantage in that, although it allows us to get an idea of what is currently happening, it is usually limited to static pictures. Although descriptions of particular experiences may be interesting, they are not always transferable to other individuals in other situations, nor do they tell us exactly why specific behaviours or events occurred. For instance, descriptions of individuals who have suffered a stressful event, such as a war or an earthquake, can be used to understand the individuals’ reactions to the event but cannot tell us anything about the long-term effects of the stress. And because there is no comparison group that did not experience the stressful situation, we cannot know what these individuals would be like if they hadn’t had the stressful experience. Correlational Research: Seeking Relationships among VariablesIn contrast to descriptive research, which is designed primarily to provide static pictures, correlational research involves the measurement of two or more relevant variables and an assessment of the relationship between or among those variables. For instance, the variables of height and weight are systematically related (correlated) because taller people generally weigh more than shorter people. In the same way, study time and memory errors are also related, because the more time a person is given to study a list of words, the fewer errors he or she will make. When there are two variables in the research design, one of them is called the predictor variable and the other the outcome variable . The research design can be visualized as shown in Figure 3.9, where the curved arrow represents the expected correlation between these two variables. One way of organizing the data from a correlational study with two variables is to graph the values of each of the measured variables using a scatter plot . As you can see in Figure 3.10 a scatter plot is a visual image of the relationship between two variables . A point is plotted for each individual at the intersection of his or her scores for the two variables. When the association between the variables on the scatter plot can be easily approximated with a straight line , as in parts (a) and (b) of Figure 3.10 the variables are said to have a linear relationship . When the straight line indicates that individuals who have above-average values for one variable also tend to have above-average values for the other variable , as in part (a), the relationship is said to be positive linear . Examples of positive linear relationships include those between height and weight, between education and income, and between age and mathematical abilities in children. In each case, people who score higher on one of the variables also tend to score higher on the other variable. Negative linear relationships , in contrast, as shown in part (b), occur when above-average values for one variable tend to be associated with below-average values for the other variable. Examples of negative linear relationships include those between the age of a child and the number of diapers the child uses, and between practice on and errors made on a learning task. In these cases, people who score higher on one of the variables tend to score lower on the other variable. Relationships between variables that cannot be described with a straight line are known as nonlinear relationships . Part (c) of Figure 3.10 shows a common pattern in which the distribution of the points is essentially random. In this case there is no relationship at all between the two variables, and they are said to be independent . Parts (d) and (e) of Figure 3.10 show patterns of association in which, although there is an association, the points are not well described by a single straight line. For instance, part (d) shows the type of relationship that frequently occurs between anxiety and performance. Increases in anxiety from low to moderate levels are associated with performance increases, whereas increases in anxiety from moderate to high levels are associated with decreases in performance. Relationships that change in direction and thus are not described by a single straight line are called curvilinear relationships . The most common statistical measure of the strength of linear relationships among variables is the Pearson correlation coefficient , which is symbolized by the letter r . The value of the correlation coefficient ranges from r = –1.00 to r = +1.00. The direction of the linear relationship is indicated by the sign of the correlation coefficient. Positive values of r (such as r = .54 or r = .67) indicate that the relationship is positive linear (i.e., the pattern of the dots on the scatter plot runs from the lower left to the upper right), whereas negative values of r (such as r = –.30 or r = –.72) indicate negative linear relationships (i.e., the dots run from the upper left to the lower right). The strength of the linear relationship is indexed by the distance of the correlation coefficient from zero (its absolute value). For instance, r = –.54 is a stronger relationship than r = .30, and r = .72 is a stronger relationship than r = –.57. Because the Pearson correlation coefficient only measures linear relationships, variables that have curvilinear relationships are not well described by r , and the observed correlation will be close to zero. It is also possible to study relationships among more than two measures at the same time. A research design in which more than one predictor variable is used to predict a single outcome variable is analyzed through multiple regression (Aiken & West, 1991). Multiple regression is a statistical technique, based on correlation coefficients among variables, that allows predicting a single outcome variable from more than one predictor variable . For instance, Figure 3.11 shows a multiple regression analysis in which three predictor variables (Salary, job satisfaction, and years employed) are used to predict a single outcome (job performance). The use of multiple regression analysis shows an important advantage of correlational research designs — they can be used to make predictions about a person’s likely score on an outcome variable (e.g., job performance) based on knowledge of other variables. An important limitation of correlational research designs is that they cannot be used to draw conclusions about the causal relationships among the measured variables. Consider, for instance, a researcher who has hypothesized that viewing violent behaviour will cause increased aggressive play in children. He has collected, from a sample of Grade 4 children, a measure of how many violent television shows each child views during the week, as well as a measure of how aggressively each child plays on the school playground. From his collected data, the researcher discovers a positive correlation between the two measured variables. Although this positive correlation appears to support the researcher’s hypothesis, it cannot be taken to indicate that viewing violent television causes aggressive behaviour. Although the researcher is tempted to assume that viewing violent television causes aggressive play, there are other possibilities. One alternative possibility is that the causal direction is exactly opposite from what has been hypothesized. Perhaps children who have behaved aggressively at school develop residual excitement that leads them to want to watch violent television shows at home (Figure 3.13): Although this possibility may seem less likely, there is no way to rule out the possibility of such reverse causation on the basis of this observed correlation. It is also possible that both causal directions are operating and that the two variables cause each other (Figure 3.14). Still another possible explanation for the observed correlation is that it has been produced by the presence of a common-causal variable (also known as a third variable ). A common-causal variable is a variable that is not part of the research hypothesis but that causes both the predictor and the outcome variable and thus produces the observed correlation between them . In our example, a potential common-causal variable is the discipline style of the children’s parents. Parents who use a harsh and punitive discipline style may produce children who like to watch violent television and who also behave aggressively in comparison to children whose parents use less harsh discipline (Figure 3.15) In this case, television viewing and aggressive play would be positively correlated (as indicated by the curved arrow between them), even though neither one caused the other but they were both caused by the discipline style of the parents (the straight arrows). When the predictor and outcome variables are both caused by a common-causal variable, the observed relationship between them is said to be spurious . A spurious relationship is a relationship between two variables in which a common-causal variable produces and “explains away” the relationship . If effects of the common-causal variable were taken away, or controlled for, the relationship between the predictor and outcome variables would disappear. In the example, the relationship between aggression and television viewing might be spurious because by controlling for the effect of the parents’ disciplining style, the relationship between television viewing and aggressive behaviour might go away. Common-causal variables in correlational research designs can be thought of as mystery variables because, as they have not been measured, their presence and identity are usually unknown to the researcher. Since it is not possible to measure every variable that could cause both the predictor and outcome variables, the existence of an unknown common-causal variable is always a possibility. For this reason, we are left with the basic limitation of correlational research: correlation does not demonstrate causation. It is important that when you read about correlational research projects, you keep in mind the possibility of spurious relationships, and be sure to interpret the findings appropriately. Although correlational research is sometimes reported as demonstrating causality without any mention being made of the possibility of reverse causation or common-causal variables, informed consumers of research, like you, are aware of these interpretational problems. In sum, correlational research designs have both strengths and limitations. One strength is that they can be used when experimental research is not possible because the predictor variables cannot be manipulated. Correlational designs also have the advantage of allowing the researcher to study behaviour as it occurs in everyday life. And we can also use correlational designs to make predictions — for instance, to predict from the scores on their battery of tests the success of job trainees during a training session. But we cannot use such correlational information to determine whether the training caused better job performance. For that, researchers rely on experiments. Experimental Research: Understanding the Causes of BehaviourThe goal of experimental research design is to provide more definitive conclusions about the causal relationships among the variables in the research hypothesis than is available from correlational designs. In an experimental research design, the variables of interest are called the independent variable (or variables ) and the dependent variable . The independent variable in an experiment is the causing variable that is created (manipulated) by the experimenter . The dependent variable in an experiment is a measured variable that is expected to be influenced by the experimental manipulation . The research hypothesis suggests that the manipulated independent variable or variables will cause changes in the measured dependent variables. We can diagram the research hypothesis by using an arrow that points in one direction. This demonstrates the expected direction of causality (Figure 3.16): Research Focus: Video Games and AggressionConsider an experiment conducted by Anderson and Dill (2000). The study was designed to test the hypothesis that viewing violent video games would increase aggressive behaviour. In this research, male and female undergraduates from Iowa State University were given a chance to play with either a violent video game (Wolfenstein 3D) or a nonviolent video game (Myst). During the experimental session, the participants played their assigned video games for 15 minutes. Then, after the play, each participant played a competitive game with an opponent in which the participant could deliver blasts of white noise through the earphones of the opponent. The operational definition of the dependent variable (aggressive behaviour) was the level and duration of noise delivered to the opponent. The design of the experiment is shown in Figure 3.17 Two advantages of the experimental research design are (a) the assurance that the independent variable (also known as the experimental manipulation ) occurs prior to the measured dependent variable, and (b) the creation of initial equivalence between the conditions of the experiment (in this case by using random assignment to conditions). Experimental designs have two very nice features. For one, they guarantee that the independent variable occurs prior to the measurement of the dependent variable. This eliminates the possibility of reverse causation. Second, the influence of common-causal variables is controlled, and thus eliminated, by creating initial equivalence among the participants in each of the experimental conditions before the manipulation occurs. The most common method of creating equivalence among the experimental conditions is through random assignment to conditions, a procedure in which the condition that each participant is assigned to is determined through a random process, such as drawing numbers out of an envelope or using a random number table . Anderson and Dill first randomly assigned about 100 participants to each of their two groups (Group A and Group B). Because they used random assignment to conditions, they could be confident that, before the experimental manipulation occurred, the students in Group A were, on average, equivalent to the students in Group B on every possible variable, including variables that are likely to be related to aggression, such as parental discipline style, peer relationships, hormone levels, diet — and in fact everything else. Then, after they had created initial equivalence, Anderson and Dill created the experimental manipulation — they had the participants in Group A play the violent game and the participants in Group B play the nonviolent game. Then they compared the dependent variable (the white noise blasts) between the two groups, finding that the students who had viewed the violent video game gave significantly longer noise blasts than did the students who had played the nonviolent game. Anderson and Dill had from the outset created initial equivalence between the groups. This initial equivalence allowed them to observe differences in the white noise levels between the two groups after the experimental manipulation, leading to the conclusion that it was the independent variable (and not some other variable) that caused these differences. The idea is that the only thing that was different between the students in the two groups was the video game they had played. Despite the advantage of determining causation, experiments do have limitations. One is that they are often conducted in laboratory situations rather than in the everyday lives of people. Therefore, we do not know whether results that we find in a laboratory setting will necessarily hold up in everyday life. Second, and more important, is that some of the most interesting and key social variables cannot be experimentally manipulated. If we want to study the influence of the size of a mob on the destructiveness of its behaviour, or to compare the personality characteristics of people who join suicide cults with those of people who do not join such cults, these relationships must be assessed using correlational designs, because it is simply not possible to experimentally manipulate these variables. Key Takeaways- Descriptive, correlational, and experimental research designs are used to collect and analyze data.
- Descriptive designs include case studies, surveys, and naturalistic observation. The goal of these designs is to get a picture of the current thoughts, feelings, or behaviours in a given group of people. Descriptive research is summarized using descriptive statistics.
- Correlational research designs measure two or more relevant variables and assess a relationship between or among them. The variables may be presented on a scatter plot to visually show the relationships. The Pearson Correlation Coefficient ( r ) is a measure of the strength of linear relationship between two variables.
- Common-causal variables may cause both the predictor and outcome variable in a correlational design, producing a spurious relationship. The possibility of common-causal variables makes it impossible to draw causal conclusions from correlational research designs.
- Experimental research involves the manipulation of an independent variable and the measurement of a dependent variable. Random assignment to conditions is normally used to create initial equivalence between the groups, allowing researchers to draw causal conclusions.
Exercises and Critical Thinking- There is a negative correlation between the row that a student sits in in a large class (when the rows are numbered from front to back) and his or her final grade in the class. Do you think this represents a causal relationship or a spurious relationship, and why?
- Think of two variables (other than those mentioned in this book) that are likely to be correlated, but in which the correlation is probably spurious. What is the likely common-causal variable that is producing the relationship?
- Imagine a researcher wants to test the hypothesis that participating in psychotherapy will cause a decrease in reported anxiety. Describe the type of research design the investigator might use to draw this conclusion. What would be the independent and dependent variables in the research?
Image AttributionsFigure 3.4: “ Reading newspaper ” by Alaskan Dude (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Reading_newspaper.jpg) is licensed under CC BY 2.0 Aiken, L., & West, S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions . Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Ainsworth, M. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Anderson, C. A., & Dill, K. E. (2000). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78 (4), 772–790. Damasio, H., Grabowski, T., Frank, R., Galaburda, A. M., Damasio, A. R., Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (2005). The return of Phineas Gage: Clues about the brain from the skull of a famous patient. In Social neuroscience: Key readings. (pp. 21–28). New York, NY: Psychology Press. Freud, S. (1909/1964). Analysis of phobia in a five-year-old boy. In E. A. Southwell & M. Merbaum (Eds.), Personality: Readings in theory and research (pp. 3–32). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. (Original work published 1909). Kotowicz, Z. (2007). The strange case of Phineas Gage. History of the Human Sciences, 20 (1), 115–131. Rokeach, M. (1964). The three Christs of Ypsilanti: A psychological study . New York, NY: Knopf. Stangor, C. (2011). Research methods for the behavioural sciences (4th ed.). Mountain View, CA: Cengage. Long DescriptionsFigure 3.6 long description: There are 25 families. 24 families have an income between $44,000 and $111,000 and one family has an income of $3,800,000. The mean income is $223,960 while the median income is $73,000. [Return to Figure 3.6] Figure 3.10 long description: Types of scatter plots. - Positive linear, r=positive .82. The plots on the graph form a rough line that runs from lower left to upper right.
- Negative linear, r=negative .70. The plots on the graph form a rough line that runs from upper left to lower right.
- Independent, r=0.00. The plots on the graph are spread out around the centre.
- Curvilinear, r=0.00. The plots of the graph form a rough line that goes up and then down like a hill.
- Curvilinear, r=0.00. The plots on the graph for a rough line that goes down and then up like a ditch.
[Return to Figure 3.10] Introduction to Psychology - 1st Canadian Edition Copyright © 2014 by Jennifer Walinga and Charles Stangor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted. Share This Book![descriptive research includes all of these except quizlet descriptive research includes all of these except quizlet](https://matomo.bccampus.ca/piwik.php?idsite=36&rec=1) Chapter 5 Research DesignResearch design is a comprehensive plan for data collection in an empirical research project. It is a “blueprint” for empirical research aimed at answering specific research questions or testing specific hypotheses, and must specify at least three processes: (1) the data collection process, (2) the instrument development process, and (3) the sampling process. The instrument development and sampling processes are described in next two chapters, and the data collection process (which is often loosely called “research design”) is introduced in this chapter and is described in further detail in Chapters 9-12. Broadly speaking, data collection methods can be broadly grouped into two categories: positivist and interpretive. Positivist methods , such as laboratory experiments and survey research, are aimed at theory (or hypotheses) testing, while interpretive methods, such as action research and ethnography, are aimed at theory building. Positivist methods employ a deductive approach to research, starting with a theory and testing theoretical postulates using empirical data. In contrast, interpretive methods employ an inductive approach that starts with data and tries to derive a theory about the phenomenon of interest from the observed data. Often times, these methods are incorrectly equated with quantitative and qualitative research. Quantitative and qualitative methods refers to the type of data being collected (quantitative data involve numeric scores, metrics, and so on, while qualitative data includes interviews, observations, and so forth) and analyzed (i.e., using quantitative techniques such as regression or qualitative techniques such as coding). Positivist research uses predominantly quantitative data, but can also use qualitative data. Interpretive research relies heavily on qualitative data, but can sometimes benefit from including quantitative data as well. Sometimes, joint use of qualitative and quantitative data may help generate unique insight into a complex social phenomenon that are not available from either types of data alone, and hence, mixed-mode designs that combine qualitative and quantitative data are often highly desirable. Key Attributes of a Research DesignThe quality of research designs can be defined in terms of four key design attributes: internal validity, external validity, construct validity, and statistical conclusion validity. Internal validity , also called causality, examines whether the observed change in a dependent variable is indeed caused by a corresponding change in hypothesized independent variable, and not by variables extraneous to the research context. Causality requires three conditions: (1) covariation of cause and effect (i.e., if cause happens, then effect also happens; and if cause does not happen, effect does not happen), (2) temporal precedence: cause must precede effect in time, (3) no plausible alternative explanation (or spurious correlation). Certain research designs, such as laboratory experiments, are strong in internal validity by virtue of their ability to manipulate the independent variable (cause) via a treatment and observe the effect (dependent variable) of that treatment after a certain point in time, while controlling for the effects of extraneous variables. Other designs, such as field surveys, are poor in internal validity because of their inability to manipulate the independent variable (cause), and because cause and effect are measured at the same point in time which defeats temporal precedence making it equally likely that the expected effect might have influenced the expected cause rather than the reverse. Although higher in internal validity compared to other methods, laboratory experiments are, by no means, immune to threats of internal validity, and are susceptible to history, testing, instrumentation, regression, and other threats that are discussed later in the chapter on experimental designs. Nonetheless, different research designs vary considerably in their respective level of internal validity. External validity or generalizability refers to whether the observed associations can be generalized from the sample to the population (population validity), or to other people, organizations, contexts, or time (ecological validity). For instance, can results drawn from a sample of financial firms in the United States be generalized to the population of financial firms (population validity) or to other firms within the United States (ecological validity)? Survey research, where data is sourced from a wide variety of individuals, firms, or other units of analysis, tends to have broader generalizability than laboratory experiments where artificially contrived treatments and strong control over extraneous variables render the findings less generalizable to real-life settings where treatments and extraneous variables cannot be controlled. The variation in internal and external validity for a wide range of research designs are shown in Figure 5.1. ![descriptive research includes all of these except quizlet](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/courses-images/wp-content/uploads/sites/538/2016/08/27022328/Screen-Shot-2017-06-26-at-9.23.07-PM.png) Figure 5.1. Internal and external validity. Some researchers claim that there is a tradeoff between internal and external validity: higher external validity can come only at the cost of internal validity and vice-versa. But this is not always the case. Research designs such as field experiments, longitudinal field surveys, and multiple case studies have higher degrees of both internal and external validities. Personally, I prefer research designs that have reasonable degrees of both internal and external validities, i.e., those that fall within the cone of validity shown in Figure 5.1. But this should not suggest that designs outside this cone are any less useful or valuable. Researchers’ choice of designs is ultimately a matter of their personal preference and competence, and the level of internal and external validity they desire. Construct validity examines how well a given measurement scale is measuring the theoretical construct that it is expected to measure. Many constructs used in social science research such as empathy, resistance to change, and organizational learning are difficult to define, much less measure. For instance, construct validity must assure that a measure of empathy is indeed measuring empathy and not compassion, which may be difficult since these constructs are somewhat similar in meaning. Construct validity is assessed in positivist research based on correlational or factor analysis of pilot test data, as described in the next chapter. Statistical conclusion validity examines the extent to which conclusions derived using a statistical procedure is valid. For example, it examines whether the right statistical method was used for hypotheses testing, whether the variables used meet the assumptions of that statistical test (such as sample size or distributional requirements), and so forth. Because interpretive research designs do not employ statistical test, statistical conclusion validity is not applicable for such analysis. The different kinds of validity and where they exist at the theoretical/empirical levels are illustrated in Figure 5.2. ![descriptive research includes all of these except quizlet](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/courses-images/wp-content/uploads/sites/538/2016/08/25203135/image36.jpg) Figure 5.2. Different Types of Validity in Scientific Research Improving Internal and External ValidityThe best research designs are those that can assure high levels of internal and external validity. Such designs would guard against spurious correlations, inspire greater faith in the hypotheses testing, and ensure that the results drawn from a small sample are generalizable to the population at large. Controls are required to assure internal validity (causality) of research designs, and can be accomplished in four ways: (1) manipulation, (2) elimination, (3) inclusion, and (4) statistical control, and (5) randomization. In manipulation , the researcher manipulates the independent variables in one or more levels (called “treatments”), and compares the effects of the treatments against a control group where subjects do not receive the treatment. Treatments may include a new drug or different dosage of drug (for treating a medical condition), a, a teaching style (for students), and so forth. This type of control is achieved in experimental or quasi-experimental designs but not in non-experimental designs such as surveys. Note that if subjects cannot distinguish adequately between different levels of treatment manipulations, their responses across treatments may not be different, and manipulation would fail. The elimination technique relies on eliminating extraneous variables by holding them constant across treatments, such as by restricting the study to a single gender or a single socio-economic status. In the inclusion technique, the role of extraneous variables is considered by including them in the research design and separately estimating their effects on the dependent variable, such as via factorial designs where one factor is gender (male versus female). Such technique allows for greater generalizability but also requires substantially larger samples. In statistical control , extraneous variables are measured and used as covariates during the statistical testing process. Finally, the randomization technique is aimed at canceling out the effects of extraneous variables through a process of random sampling, if it can be assured that these effects are of a random (non-systematic) nature. Two types of randomization are: (1) random selection , where a sample is selected randomly from a population, and (2) random assignment , where subjects selected in a non-random manner are randomly assigned to treatment groups. Randomization also assures external validity, allowing inferences drawn from the sample to be generalized to the population from which the sample is drawn. Note that random assignment is mandatory when random selection is not possible because of resource or access constraints. However, generalizability across populations is harder to ascertain since populations may differ on multiple dimensions and you can only control for few of those dimensions. Popular Research DesignsAs noted earlier, research designs can be classified into two categories – positivist and interpretive – depending how their goal in scientific research. Positivist designs are meant for theory testing, while interpretive designs are meant for theory building. Positivist designs seek generalized patterns based on an objective view of reality, while interpretive designs seek subjective interpretations of social phenomena from the perspectives of the subjects involved. Some popular examples of positivist designs include laboratory experiments, field experiments, field surveys, secondary data analysis, and case research while examples of interpretive designs include case research, phenomenology, and ethnography. Note that case research can be used for theory building or theory testing, though not at the same time. Not all techniques are suited for all kinds of scientific research. Some techniques such as focus groups are best suited for exploratory research, others such as ethnography are best for descriptive research, and still others such as laboratory experiments are ideal for explanatory research. Following are brief descriptions of some of these designs. Additional details are provided in Chapters 9-12. Experimental studies are those that are intended to test cause-effect relationships (hypotheses) in a tightly controlled setting by separating the cause from the effect in time, administering the cause to one group of subjects (the “treatment group”) but not to another group (“control group”), and observing how the mean effects vary between subjects in these two groups. For instance, if we design a laboratory experiment to test the efficacy of a new drug in treating a certain ailment, we can get a random sample of people afflicted with that ailment, randomly assign them to one of two groups (treatment and control groups), administer the drug to subjects in the treatment group, but only give a placebo (e.g., a sugar pill with no medicinal value). More complex designs may include multiple treatment groups, such as low versus high dosage of the drug, multiple treatments, such as combining drug administration with dietary interventions. In a true experimental design , subjects must be randomly assigned between each group. If random assignment is not followed, then the design becomes quasi-experimental . Experiments can be conducted in an artificial or laboratory setting such as at a university (laboratory experiments) or in field settings such as in an organization where the phenomenon of interest is actually occurring (field experiments). Laboratory experiments allow the researcher to isolate the variables of interest and control for extraneous variables, which may not be possible in field experiments. Hence, inferences drawn from laboratory experiments tend to be stronger in internal validity, but those from field experiments tend to be stronger in external validity. Experimental data is analyzed using quantitative statistical techniques. The primary strength of the experimental design is its strong internal validity due to its ability to isolate, control, and intensively examine a small number of variables, while its primary weakness is limited external generalizability since real life is often more complex (i.e., involve more extraneous variables) than contrived lab settings. Furthermore, if the research does not identify ex ante relevant extraneous variables and control for such variables, such lack of controls may hurt internal validity and may lead to spurious correlations. Field surveys are non-experimental designs that do not control for or manipulate independent variables or treatments, but measure these variables and test their effects using statistical methods. Field surveys capture snapshots of practices, beliefs, or situations from a random sample of subjects in field settings through a survey questionnaire or less frequently, through a structured interview. In cross-sectional field surveys , independent and dependent variables are measured at the same point in time (e.g., using a single questionnaire), while in longitudinal field surveys , dependent variables are measured at a later point in time than the independent variables. The strengths of field surveys are their external validity (since data is collected in field settings), their ability to capture and control for a large number of variables, and their ability to study a problem from multiple perspectives or using multiple theories. However, because of their non-temporal nature, internal validity (cause-effect relationships) are difficult to infer, and surveys may be subject to respondent biases (e.g., subjects may provide a “socially desirable” response rather than their true response) which further hurts internal validity. Secondary data analysis is an analysis of data that has previously been collected and tabulated by other sources. Such data may include data from government agencies such as employment statistics from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Services or development statistics by country from the United Nations Development Program, data collected by other researchers (often used in meta-analytic studies), or publicly available third-party data, such as financial data from stock markets or real-time auction data from eBay. This is in contrast to most other research designs where collecting primary data for research is part of the researcher’s job. Secondary data analysis may be an effective means of research where primary data collection is too costly or infeasible, and secondary data is available at a level of analysis suitable for answering the researcher’s questions. The limitations of this design are that the data might not have been collected in a systematic or scientific manner and hence unsuitable for scientific research, since the data was collected for a presumably different purpose, they may not adequately address the research questions of interest to the researcher, and interval validity is problematic if the temporal precedence between cause and effect is unclear. Case research is an in-depth investigation of a problem in one or more real-life settings (case sites) over an extended period of time. Data may be collected using a combination of interviews, personal observations, and internal or external documents. Case studies can be positivist in nature (for hypotheses testing) or interpretive (for theory building). The strength of this research method is its ability to discover a wide variety of social, cultural, and political factors potentially related to the phenomenon of interest that may not be known in advance. Analysis tends to be qualitative in nature, but heavily contextualized and nuanced. However, interpretation of findings may depend on the observational and integrative ability of the researcher, lack of control may make it difficult to establish causality, and findings from a single case site may not be readily generalized to other case sites. Generalizability can be improved by replicating and comparing the analysis in other case sites in a multiple case design . Focus group research is a type of research that involves bringing in a small group of subjects (typically 6 to 10 people) at one location, and having them discuss a phenomenon of interest for a period of 1.5 to 2 hours. The discussion is moderated and led by a trained facilitator, who sets the agenda and poses an initial set of questions for participants, makes sure that ideas and experiences of all participants are represented, and attempts to build a holistic understanding of the problem situation based on participants’ comments and experiences. Internal validity cannot be established due to lack of controls and the findings may not be generalized to other settings because of small sample size. Hence, focus groups are not generally used for explanatory or descriptive research, but are more suited for exploratory research. Action research assumes that complex social phenomena are best understood by introducing interventions or “actions” into those phenomena and observing the effects of those actions. In this method, the researcher is usually a consultant or an organizational member embedded within a social context such as an organization, who initiates an action such as new organizational procedures or new technologies, in response to a real problem such as declining profitability or operational bottlenecks. The researcher’s choice of actions must be based on theory, which should explain why and how such actions may cause the desired change. The researcher then observes the results of that action, modifying it as necessary, while simultaneously learning from the action and generating theoretical insights about the target problem and interventions. The initial theory is validated by the extent to which the chosen action successfully solves the target problem. Simultaneous problem solving and insight generation is the central feature that distinguishes action research from all other research methods, and hence, action research is an excellent method for bridging research and practice. This method is also suited for studying unique social problems that cannot be replicated outside that context, but it is also subject to researcher bias and subjectivity, and the generalizability of findings is often restricted to the context where the study was conducted. Ethnography is an interpretive research design inspired by anthropology that emphasizes that research phenomenon must be studied within the context of its culture. The researcher is deeply immersed in a certain culture over an extended period of time (8 months to 2 years), and during that period, engages, observes, and records the daily life of the studied culture, and theorizes about the evolution and behaviors in that culture. Data is collected primarily via observational techniques, formal and informal interaction with participants in that culture, and personal field notes, while data analysis involves “sense-making”. The researcher must narrate her experience in great detail so that readers may experience that same culture without necessarily being there. The advantages of this approach are its sensitiveness to the context, the rich and nuanced understanding it generates, and minimal respondent bias. However, this is also an extremely time and resource-intensive approach, and findings are specific to a given culture and less generalizable to other cultures. Selecting Research DesignsGiven the above multitude of research designs, which design should researchers choose for their research? Generally speaking, researchers tend to select those research designs that they are most comfortable with and feel most competent to handle, but ideally, the choice should depend on the nature of the research phenomenon being studied. In the preliminary phases of research, when the research problem is unclear and the researcher wants to scope out the nature and extent of a certain research problem, a focus group (for individual unit of analysis) or a case study (for organizational unit of analysis) is an ideal strategy for exploratory research. As one delves further into the research domain, but finds that there are no good theories to explain the phenomenon of interest and wants to build a theory to fill in the unmet gap in that area, interpretive designs such as case research or ethnography may be useful designs. If competing theories exist and the researcher wishes to test these different theories or integrate them into a larger theory, positivist designs such as experimental design, survey research, or secondary data analysis are more appropriate. Regardless of the specific research design chosen, the researcher should strive to collect quantitative and qualitative data using a combination of techniques such as questionnaires, interviews, observations, documents, or secondary data. For instance, even in a highly structured survey questionnaire, intended to collect quantitative data, the researcher may leave some room for a few open-ended questions to collect qualitative data that may generate unexpected insights not otherwise available from structured quantitative data alone. Likewise, while case research employ mostly face-to-face interviews to collect most qualitative data, the potential and value of collecting quantitative data should not be ignored. As an example, in a study of organizational decision making processes, the case interviewer can record numeric quantities such as how many months it took to make certain organizational decisions, how many people were involved in that decision process, and how many decision alternatives were considered, which can provide valuable insights not otherwise available from interviewees’ narrative responses. Irrespective of the specific research design employed, the goal of the researcher should be to collect as much and as diverse data as possible that can help generate the best possible insights about the phenomenon of interest. - Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices. Authored by : Anol Bhattacherjee. Provided by : University of South Florida. Located at : http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/oa_textbooks/3/ . License : CC BY-NC-SA: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
Methods of Social Research, SOC 300, Exam 1 ANSWERS Summer 2003, PriceMatching (2 points each) Terms Letter of Matching Definition 1. Sociology B 2. Experiments H 3. Content Analysis I 4. Field Research A 5. Grounded Theory C 6. Research Design E 7. Interactionism or Interpretive G 8. Conflict or Critical Theory D 9. Functionalism J 10. SOC 300 F Definitionsa. Research in which a researcher directly observes people interacting in a natural setting. b. The study of social interaction and social organization. c. A way of developing explanations about the social world that starts with empirical observations of the world and builds abstract patterns from them. d. The theoretical perspective which views social issues and problems in terms of dominant groups exerting power over others to ensure that the dominant group’s interests are served. e. A plan for systematically gathering and analyzing information to answer a research question. f. A course with content that many students find boring. g. The theoretical perspective that focuses on how people understand the everyday social settings in which they interact with others. h. Research in which one intervenes or does something to one group of people but not to another, then compares results of the two groups. i. Research that examines patterns of symbolic meaning within written text, audio, visual or other communication medium. j. The theoretical perspective that explains social patterns as existing because they serve a purpose in society. Multiple Choice: Choose the Best Response (3 points each) 11. Dalessha developed a pure model of the "street walker" prostitute to help her study a large city ghetto. She is using a(n): a. Parsimony b. Ideal Type ** c. Metaphor d. Jargon 12. Dr. Smith said that social science cannot be value neutral, and a good study requires putting results into action to help people change society. Dr. Smith uses which approach to social science? a. Positivism b. Interpretative Social Science c. Critical Social Science ** d. None of the above 13. Henry Hogson conducted an experiment in which he tested the theory that the intensity of social interaction among people increases if they are anxious. What type of study is this most likely to be? a. Cost Benefit Analysis b. Explanatory Research ** c. Content Analysis d. Exploratory Research 14. For the positivist approach to research, a theory looks like: a. A series of positive statements about the world. b. A logical system of laws, axioms, and propositions. ** c. A critique which claims that people are being mislead. d. A political program of action and social change. 15. In exploratory research one does all of the following, EXCEPT: a. Become familiar with the basic facts, people and concerns involved. b. Generate many ideas and develop tentative hypotheses. c. Determine the feasibility of doing additional research. d. Test a theory or explanation. ** 16. Professor Tun-jen Cheng wanted to study the cause for thousands of people from Hong Kong moving to Vancouver, British Columbia. In order to establish temporal order in his causal argument he must show which of the following: a. There is a correlation between events in Hong Kong and a decision to move. b. Events occurred in Hong Kong before people moved to Vancouver. c. A fear for the future of Hong Kong and no other reason caused the move to Vancouver. d. All of the above. ** **THREW #16 OUT: Only 4 students got the right answer. 17. Social research methods include all of the following, except: a. Surveys b. Therapy ** c. Experiments d. Interviews 18. A local human service organization contacted Mr. Tanaka. The organization asked him to conduct a study to identify the difficulties and problems of the elderly in the local community so that the organization could develop social programs to help them. What type of study would this be? a. Needs assessment * b. Cost-benefit analysis c. Planning, Programming and Budgeting System d. Summative Evaluation Research 19. Which best summarizes the main goal of descriptive research ? a. Advance knowledge about an underlying process or complete a theory. b. Develop a detailed picture of a situation or issue. ** c. Extend a theory or principle into new areas or issues. d. Provide evidence to support or refute an explanation. 20. A research method in which subjects respond to a series of items in a questionnaire: a. random sample. b. target group. c. experiment. d. Survey. ** 21. Elizabeth Bethouse conducted a study of gambling establishments operated by American Indian groups. She examined two establishments operated by different tribes. During the study she spent many hours at each establishment and gained a detailed knowledge of the tribal leaders, gambling employees and gambling customers. She also investigated how the establishments were organized, their impact on economic development in the area and how tribal members saw them. She conducted: a. a case study ** b. a summative evaluation study c. a cohort study d. action research 22. What is the purpose of basic social research or basic sociology ? a. Solve social problems and find which policies are best. b. Improve social programs so they become more effective. c. Invent new taxonomies and jargon. d. Create fundamental knowledge about how the social world works. ** 23. Which approach says that the purpose of research is to study the creation of social meaning? a. Positivism b. Interpretative Social Science ** c. Critical Social Science d. None of the above 24. Social research methods are: a. Ways to gather information to answer a question about the social world. ** b. Ways to convince people to participate in a study. c. Ways to manipulate people. d. Ways to increase the number of friends you have. 25. Which of the following is not an example of a qualitative research method: a. Ethnography b. Time series** c. Covert Observation d. Informal or Personal Interviews 26. A friend makes the following comment: “Persons who grew up with a much older sibling tend to treat the older sibling as a parent figure.” She is making a: a. Verstehen b. Theory c. Relativism d. Generalization ** 27. Joe Foss studied gender differences in attitudes toward mathematics and science among 45 first grade students. Over the next twelve years he studied the same 45 children when they were in the fifth, eighth and twelfth grades. This is what type of research? a. Case study research b. Cross-sectional research (a study on a cross-sectional sample) c. Panel study research (a study on a panel sample) ** d. Action-oriented research 28. A research method in which a researcher asks study participants several conversational style questions and does not provide a set of responses to choose from: a. case study b. interview ** c. comparative method d. quantitative study 29. All of the following characterize applied sociological research except which one? a. Doing research is usually part of a job assignment and sponsors/supervisors who are not professional researchers will judge/use the results. b. Success is based on whether sponsors/supervisors use the results in decision-making. c. The primary concern is with the internal logic and rigor of the research design, so a researcher attempts to reach the absolute norms of scientific rigor and scholarship. ** d. Research projects are limited by the demands and interests of employers or sponsors. 30. This test: (No wrong answer) a. Fairly reflects the course readings, lectures and discussion thus far this semester. b. Does not fairly reflect the course readings, lectures and discussion thus far this semester. Essay (20 points) : Write an essay answer on ONE of the following, approximately 1 page in length.Briefly describe the steps involved in conducting a research project. WRITTEN IN ESSAY FORM. SHOULD GIVE AN EXAMPLE OF EACH STEP, PERHAPS USING YOUR RESEARCH QUESTION - Identify a question/problem/topic.
- Learn what else is known on this question or problem (Lit Review). Revise question/topic.
- Choose a way to observe the question or problem to gain new insight (experiment, survey, interview, observation, etc.).
- Collect data.
- Analyze data.
- Interpret meaning of analysis findings.
- Disseminate findings.
+20 points: Student clearly identified each step. +15 points: Student clearly identified most of the steps. +10 points: Student clearly identified half of the steps. +5 points: Student clearly identified 1-2 steps. -2 to -5 points for minor mistakes. -10 IF NOT IN ESSAY FORM Explain the difference between qualitative and quantitative research. Use examples. QuantitativeAssumptions: There is one reality/truth that exists independent of the research. We can know it before observing reality and develop a theory to test and standardized questions (variables) to ask people. We can then measure reality to test our theory objectively (free from researcher bias, values). Process of research unfolds as: theory → research q → method → theory Any problem or topic of study can be broken down into all of its parts, and that the sum of the parts equals the whole problem. A scientist studies a question/issue by “reducing” it into measurable, observable parts called variables. After measuring the parts, the scientist adds them back up again to describe or understand the original problem. Examples of Quantitative Research: Questions that ask “what?” or “how many?”. Includes surveys, experiments, most existing/secondary data QualitativeAssumptions: There is no one reality for a theory to capture. There is no one understanding. Meanings and reality change across people, place and time. Need to let reality, not apriori theory, drive understanding (grounded theory). Researcher values enhance/shape the study. Process of research unfolds as: research q → method → theory A problems or topic of study cannot be broken down into parts. You have to observe the topic/problem in its natural form. Examples of Qualitative Research: Questions that ask “why?” or “ how does something occur”? Also use if the topic is too complicated to develop survey type questions about, or you don’t know enough about the topic to write questions about. Includes interviews, observation, historical/comparative, content analysis, case studies. Quantitative Answer: 10 points total | Qualitative Answer: 10 points total | +5 points: Student’s explanation of quantitative research conveys understanding of main tenets of quantitative research. | +5 points: Student’s explanation of qualitative research conveys understanding of main tenets of qualitative research. | +5 points: Student identifies examples of quantitative research: surveys, experiments, types of questions best answered by quantitative methods. | +5 points: Student identifies examples of qualitative research: interviews, observation, historical/comparative, types of questions best answered by qualitative methods. | What is the role of the major theoretical frameworks in research? Use examples. Theory frames how we think about or see a topic. As such, theory influences which topics we choose to study. Theory influences how we interpret past research findings. Theory influences choice of research method: Functionalist and Conflict approaches to topics tend to use quantitative methods. SI approaches tend to use qualitative. Inductive/Qualitative Research: Theory plays a bigger role after data is collected and researcher is making sense of the data observed/collected. Deductive/Quantitative Research: Theory plays a biggest role at beginning and end of research. Quantitative research begins with a theory to test, and ends by revising the theory based on the study findings. +5 points: Student provides general description of how theory influences research topic chosen. +5 points: Student identifies that theory influences choice of research method. +5 points: Student identifies role of theory in quantitative/deductive research. +5 points: Student identifies role of theory in qualitative/inductive research. A local PTA hires you to identify what services and programs parents would like the PTA to provide. What method would you use to help answer their question? How would you use this method? Based on what students know thus far in the course, the best methods are probably a mail or telephone survey. But, you could also do qualitative/in-depth interviews. (Focus groups would be good but the students don’t know much about them yet.) Methods that would not work include experiments, observation, historical/document analysis, secondary data. Process Involved = a. Clarifying the PTA’s questions – what they want to know, what they want to do with data. b. Learn what else is known on this question or problem. c. How you would collect data using this method. Choice of Reasonable Method = +5 points Logical Explanation of Why Chose this Method = +5 points Description of How to Use Method = +10 points - Full 10 points if student identifies general process involved.
· 5 points if student doesn’t convey a clear understanding of the process involved in using the method identified. · -2 to -5 points for minor mistakes. ![](//cikl.online/777/templates/cheerup2/res/banner1.gif) |
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
research methods that yield descriptions of behavior. What are the types of descriptive research methods? naturalistic and laboratory observation, case study, survey. What is naturalistic observation? descriptive research method in which researchers observe and record behavior in its natural setting without attempting to influence or control ...
Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Which of the following statements are true about descriptive research: (multiple choice answer) A. Descriptive Research can tell us how happy people are. B. Descriptive Research cannot tell us what makes people happy. C. Descriptive Research cannot tell us why people are happy. D. Descriptive Research can't tell us what to do to ...
Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like 1) Psychology A) is a collection of theories that have yet to be tested out. B) is the scientific study of behavior and mental processes. C) is the study of supernatural phenomena. D) consists solely of various forms of therapy. E) is the study of common sense in individuals., 2) Which of the following is FALSE regarding the ...
Descriptive research aims to accurately and systematically describe a population, situation or phenomenon. It can answer what, where, when and how questions, but not why questions. A descriptive research design can use a wide variety of research methods to investigate one or more variables. Unlike in experimental research, the researcher does ...
Types of descriptive research. Observational method. Case studies. Surveys. Recap. Descriptive research methods are used to define the who, what, and where of human behavior and other ...
The three main categories of psychological research are descriptive, correlational, and experimental research. Research studies that do not test specific relationships between variables are called descriptive, or qualitative, studies. These studies are used to describe general or specific behaviors and attributes that are observed and measured.
Video 2.4.1. Descriptive Research Design provides explanation and examples for quantitative descriptive research.A closed-captioned version of this video is available here.. Descriptive research is distinct from correlational research, in which researchers formally test whether a relationship exists between two or more variables. Experimental research goes a step further beyond descriptive and ...
Descriptive studies have the following characteristics: 1. While descriptive research can employ a number of variables, only one variable is required to conduct a descriptive study. 2. Descriptive studies are closely associated with observational studies, but they are not limited with observation data collection method.
A descriptive study is one in which information is collected without changing the environment (i.e., nothing is manipulated). Sometimes these are referred to as " correlational " or " observational " studies. The Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP) defines a descriptive study as "Any study that is not truly experimental.".
Which descriptive research technique is correctly matched with a description? A)survey - Participants are systematically studied in their natural environment. B)case study - A single individual or group is examined in detail. C)naturalistic observation - Questionnaires or interviews are used to probe behavior or attitudes. D)All of these choices are correctly matched.
Descriptive Research: Assessing the Current State of Affairs. Descriptive research is designed to create a snapshot of the current thoughts, feelings, or behaviour of individuals. This section reviews three types of descriptive research: case studies, surveys, and naturalistic observation (Figure 3.4).
an intensive study of a single individual or small group of individuals. a questionnaire or interview designed to investigate the opinions, behaviors, or characteristics of a particular group. a selected segment of the population used to represent the group that is being studied. a selected segment that very closely parallels the larger ...
Question: Descriptive studies include all of the following EXCEPT: interviews case studies observational studies clinical trials. Show transcribed image text. Here's the best way to solve it. Created by Chegg. Share Share. Answer: Clinical Trials Researchers and psychologists gather data and describe the spe …. View the full answer.
Descriptive research, as the term implies, describes the characteristics of the population or phenomenon being studied. It does not involve the manipulation of subjects or variables and does not establish cause-effect relationships. This research method includes observation, case studies, surveys, and interviews.
Research design is a comprehensive plan for data collection in an empirical research project. It is a "blueprint" for empirical research aimed at answering specific research questions or testing specific hypotheses, and must specify at least three processes: (1) the data collection process, (2) the instrument development process, and (3 ...
A political program of action and social change. 15. In exploratory research one does all of the following, EXCEPT: a. Become familiar with the basic facts, people and concerns involved. b. Generate many ideas and develop tentative hypotheses. c. Determine the feasibility of doing additional research. d.
3. Subject bias occurs. Causal-comparative research usually have three weaknesses: Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Descriptive Research, what caused it, • Build on previous information • Show relationships between variables • Require representative samples • Structured research plans • Conclusive ...
A. Cross-sectional design. B. Longitudinal design. C. Case study design. D. Correlational design. D. Although not considered the strongest evidence for change in nursing practice, findings from descriptive studies can be used in the following way (s) to support evidence-based nursing practice: A. Care planning. B. nursing interventions.
e. in-depth interviews. all of the following are considered qualitative research except. a. experimnet. b. observation. c. focus group. d. social media. e. in-depth interviews. There are 2 steps to solve this one.
Descriptive research is a type of research that aims to describe a phenomenon or a topic, but it does not produce an exact solution. Explanation: Descriptive research is a type of research that aims to describe or explain a phenomenon or a topic. It focuses on collecting data through methods such as surveys, observations, or interviews, and ...
Expert-Verified Answer. Descriptive research aims to define, classify, catalog or characterize the object of study without resorting to quantification. Descriptive research is conducted for the analysis of the characteristics of a population or phenomenon without knowing the relationships between them. The main methods of descriptive research ...