how to address ethical issues in research pdf

• The Open University
• Accessibility hub
• Guest user / Sign out
• Study with The Open University

My OpenLearn Profile

Personalise your OpenLearn profile, save your favourite content and get recognition for your learning

Addressing ethical issues in your research proposal

This article explores the ethical issues that may arise in your proposed study during your doctoral research degree.

What ethical principles apply when planning and conducting research?

Research ethics are the moral principles that govern how researchers conduct their studies (Wellcome Trust, 2014). As there are elements of uncertainty and risk involved in any study, every researcher has to consider how they can uphold these ethical principles and conduct the research in a way that protects the interests and welfare of participants and other stakeholders (such as organisations).  

You will need to consider the ethical issues that might arise in your proposed study. Consideration of the fundamental ethical principles that underpin all research will help you to identify the key issues and how these could be addressed. As you are probably a practitioner who wants to undertake research within your workplace, consider how your role as an ‘insider’ influences how you will conduct your study. Think about the ethical issues that might arise when you become an insider researcher (for example, relating to trust, confidentiality and anonymity).  

What key ethical principles do you think will be important when planning or conducting your research, particularly as an insider? Principles that come to mind might include autonomy, respect, dignity, privacy, informed consent and confidentiality. You may also have identified principles such as competence, integrity, wellbeing, justice and non-discrimination.  

Key ethical issues that you will address as an insider researcher include:

• Gaining trust
• Avoiding coercion when recruiting colleagues or other participants (such as students or service users)
• Practical challenges relating to ensuring the confidentiality and anonymity of organisations and staff or other participants.

(Heslop et al, 2018)

A fuller discussion of ethical principles is available from the British Psychological Society’s Code of Human Research Ethics (BPS, 2021).

You can also refer to guidance from the British Educational Research Association and the British Association for Applied Linguistics .

Ethical principles are essential for protecting the interests of research participants, including maximising the benefits and minimising any risks associated with taking part in a study. These principles describe ethical conduct which reflects the integrity of the researcher, promotes the wellbeing of participants and ensures high-quality research is conducted (Health Research Authority, 2022).  

Research ethics is therefore not simply about gaining ethical approval for your study to be conducted. Research ethics relates to your moral conduct as a doctoral researcher and will apply throughout your study from design to dissemination (British Psychological Society, 2021). When you apply to undertake a doctorate, you will need to clearly indicate in your proposal that you understand these ethical principles and are committed to upholding them.  

Where can I find ethical guidance and resources? 

Professional bodies, learned societies, health and social care authorities, academic publications, Research Ethics Committees and research organisations provide a range of ethical guidance and resources. International codes such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights underpin ethical frameworks (United Nations, 1948).  

You may be aware of key legislation in your own country or the country where you plan to undertake the research, including laws relating to consent, data protection and decision-making capacity, for example, the Data Protection Act, 2018 (UK).  If you want to find out more about becoming an ethical researcher, check out this Open University short course: Becoming an ethical researcher: Introduction and guidance: What is a badged course? - OpenLearn - Open University  

You should be able to justify the research decisions you make. Utilising these resources will guide your ethical judgements when writing your proposal and ultimately when designing and conducting your research study. The Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research (British Educational Research Association, 2018) identifies the key responsibilities you will have when you conduct your research, including the range of stakeholders that you will have responsibilities to, as follows:   

• to your participants (e.g. to appropriately inform them, facilitate their participation and support them)
• clients, stakeholders and sponsors
• the community of educational or health and social care researchers
• for publication and dissemination
• your wellbeing and development

The National Institute for Health and Care Research (no date) has emphasised the need to promote equality, diversity and inclusion when undertaking research, particularly to address long-standing social and health inequalities. Research should be informed by the diversity of people’s experiences and insights, so that it will lead to the development of practice that addresses genuine need. A commitment to equality, diversity and inclusion aims to eradicate prejudice and discrimination on the basis of an individual or group of individuals' protected characteristics such as sex (gender), disability, race, sexual orientation, in line with the Equality Act 2010.  

The NIHR has produced guidance for enhancing the inclusion of ‘under-served groups’ when designing a research study (2020). Although the guidance refers to clinical research it is relevant to research more broadly.  

You should consider how you will promote equality and diversity in your planned study, including through aspects such as your research topic or question, the methodology you will use, the participants you plan to recruit and how you will analyse and interpret your data.    

What ethical issues do I need to consider when writing my research proposal?

You might be planning to undertake research in a health, social care, educational or other setting, including observations and interviews. The following prompts should help you to identify key ethical issues that you need to bear in mind when undertaking research in such settings.  

1.     Imagine you are a potential participant. Think about the questions and concerns that you might have:

• How would you feel if a researcher sat in your space and took notes, completed a checklist, or made an audio or film recording?
• What harm might a researcher cause by observing or interviewing you and others?
• What would you want to know about the researcher and ask them about the study before giving consent?
• When imagining you are the participant, how could the researcher make you feel more comfortable to be observed or interviewed? 

2.     Having considered the perspective of your potential participant, how would you take account of concerns such as privacy, consent, wellbeing and power in your research proposal?  

[Adapted from OpenLearn course: Becoming an ethical researcher, Week 2 Activity 3: Becoming an ethical researcher - OpenLearn - Open University ]  

The ethical issues to be considered will vary depending on your organisational context/role, the types of participants you plan to recruit (for example, children, adults with mental health problems), the research methods you will use, and the types of data you will collect. You will need to decide how to recruit your participants so you do not inappropriately exclude anyone.  Consider what methods may be necessary to facilitate their voice and how you can obtain their consent to taking part or ensure that consent is obtained from someone else as necessary, for example, a parent in the case of a child. 

You should also think about how to avoid imposing an unnecessary burden or costs on your participants. For example, by minimising the length of time they will have to commit to the study and by providing travel or other expenses. Identify the measures that you will take to store your participants’ data safely and maintain their confidentiality and anonymity when you report your findings. You could do this by storing interview and video recordings in a secure server and anonymising their names and those of their organisations using pseudonyms.  

Professional codes such as the Code of Human Research Ethics (BPS, 2021) provide guidance on undertaking research with children. Being an ‘insider’ researching within your own organisation has advantages. However, you should also consider how this might impact on your research, such as power dynamics, consent, potential bias and any conflict of interest between your professional and researcher roles (Sapiro and Matthews, 2020).  

How have other researchers addressed any ethical challenges?

The literature provides researchers’ accounts explaining how they addressed ethical challenges when undertaking studies. For example, Turcotte-Tremblay and McSween-Cadieux (2018) discuss strategies for protecting participants’ confidentiality when disseminating findings locally, such as undertaking fieldwork in multiple sites and providing findings in a generalised form. In addition, professional guidance includes case studies illustrating how ethical issues can be addressed, including when researching online forums (British Sociological Association, no date).

Watch the videos below and consider what insights the postgraduate researcher and supervisor provide  regarding issues such as being an ‘insider researcher’, power relations, avoiding intrusion, maintaining participant anonymity and complying with research ethics and professional standards. How might their experiences inform the design and conduct of your own study?

Postgraduate researcher and supervisor talk about ethical considerations

Your thoughtful consideration of the ethical issues that might arise and how you would address these should enable you to propose an ethically informed study and conduct it in a responsible, fair and sensitive manner. 

British Educational Research Association (2018)  Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research.  Available at:  https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018  (Accessed: 9 June 2023).

British Psychological Society (2021)  Code of Human Research Ethics . Available at:  https://cms.bps.org.uk/sites/default/files/2022-06/BPS%20Code%20of%20Human%20Research%20Ethics%20%281%29.pdf  (Accessed: 9 June 2023).

British Sociological Association (2016)  Researching online forums . Available at:  https://www.britsoc.co.uk/media/24834/j000208_researching_online_forums_-cs1-_v3.pdf  (Accessed: 9 June 2023).

Health Research Authority (2022)  UK Policy Framework for Health and Social Care Research . Available at:  https://www.hra.nhs.uk/planning-and-improving-research/policies-standards-legislation/uk-policy-framework-health-social-care-research/uk-policy-framework-health-and-social-care-research/#chiefinvestigators  (Accessed: 9 June 2023).

Heslop, C., Burns, S., Lobo, R. (2018) ‘Managing qualitative research as insider-research in small rural communities’,  Rural and Remote Health , 18: pp. 4576.

Equality Act 2010, c. 15.  Available at:   https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/introduction   (Accessed: 9 June 2023).

National Institute for Health and Care Research (no date)  Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) . Available at:  https://arc-kss.nihr.ac.uk/public-and-community-involvement/pcie-guide/how-to-do-pcie/equality-diversity-and-inclusion-edi  (Accessed: 9 June 2023).

National Institute for Health and Care Research (2020)  Improving inclusion of under-served groups in clinical research: Guidance from INCLUDE project.  Available at:   https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/improving-inclusion-of-under-served-groups-in-clinical-research-guidance-from-include-project/25435  (Accessed: 9 June 2023).

Sapiro, B. and Matthews, E. (2020) ‘Both Insider and Outsider. On Conducting Social Work Research in Mental Health Settings’,  Advances in Social Work , 20(3). Available at:  https://doi.org/10.18060/23926

Turcotte-Tremblay, A. and McSween-Cadieux, E. (2018) ‘A reflection on the challenge of protecting confidentiality of participants when disseminating research results locally’,  BMC Medical Ethics,  19(supplement 1), no. 45. Available at:   https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12910-018-0279-0

United Nations General Assembly (1948)  The Universal Declaration of Human Rights . Resolution A/RES/217/A. Available at:  https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights#:~:text=Drafted%20by%20representatives%20with%20different,all%20peoples%20and%20all%20nations . (Accessed: 9 June 2023).

Wellcome Trust (2014)  Ensuring your research is ethical: A guide for Extended Project Qualification students . Available at:  https://wellcome.org/sites/default/files/wtp057673_0.pdf  (Accessed: 9 June 2023).

More articles from the research proposal collection

Writing your research proposal

A doctoral research degree is the highest academic qualification that a student can achieve. The guidance provided in these articles will help you apply for one of the two main types of research degree offered by The Open University.

Level: 1 Introductory

Defining your research methodology

Your research methodology is the approach you will take to guide your research process and explain why you use particular methods. This article explains more.

Writing your proposal and preparing for your interview

The final article looks at writing your research proposal - from the introduction through to citations and referencing - as well as preparing for your interview.

Free courses on postgraduate study

Are you ready for postgraduate study?

This free course, Are you ready for postgraduate study, will help you to become familiar with the requirements and demands of postgraduate study and ensure you are ready to develop the skills and confidence to pursue your learning further.

Succeeding in postgraduate study

This free course, Succeeding in postgraduate study, will help you to become familiar with the requirements and demands of postgraduate study and to develop the skills and confidence to pursue your learning further.

Applying to study for a PhD in psychology

This free OpenLearn course is for psychology students and graduates who are interested in PhD study at some future point. Even if you have met PhD students and heard about their projects, it is likely that you have only a vague idea of what PhD study entails. This course is intended to give you more information.

Become an OU student

Ratings & comments, share this free course, copyright information, publication details.

• Originally published: Tuesday, 27 June 2023
• Body text - Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 : The Open University
• Image 'Pebbles balance on a stone see-saw' - Copyright: Photo  51106733  /  Balance  ©  Anatoli Styf  |  Dreamstime.com
• Image 'Camera equipment set up filming a man talking' - Copyright: Photo  42631221  ©  Gabriel Robledo  |  Dreamstime.com
• Image 'Succeeding in postgraduate study' - Copyright: © Everste/Getty Images
• Image 'Writing your research proposal' - Copyright free
• Image 'Defining your research methodology' - Copyright free
• Image 'Addressing ethical issues in your research proposal' - Copyright: Photo 50384175 / Children Playing © Lenutaidi | Dreamstime.com
• Image 'Writing your proposal and preparing for your interview' - Copyright: Photo 133038259 / Black Student © Fizkes | Dreamstime.com
• Image 'Applying to study for a PhD in psychology' - Copyright free
• Image 'Are you ready for postgraduate study?' - Copyright free

Rate and Review

Rate this article, review this article.

Log into OpenLearn to leave reviews and join in the conversation.

Article reviews

For further information, take a look at our frequently asked questions which may give you the support you need.

Conceptualising Ethical Issues in the Conduct of Research: Results from a Critical and Systematic Literature Review

• Published: 27 April 2021
• Volume 20 , pages 335–358, ( 2022 )

Cite this article

• Élie Beauchemin 1 ,
• Louis Pierre Côté   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7290-7512 1 ,
• Marie-Josée Drolet   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8384-4193 2 &
• Bryn Williams-Jones   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6771-3919 3  

1941 Accesses

10 Citations

1 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

This article concerns  the ways in which authors from various fields conceptualise the ethical issues arising in the conduct of research. We reviewed critically and systematically the literature concerning the ethics of conducting research in order to engage in a reflection about the vocabulary and conceptual categories used in the publications reviewed. To understand better how the ethical issues involved in conducting research are conceptualised in the publications reviewed, we 1) established an inventory of the conceptualisations reviewed, and 2) we critically assessed them. We found that the publications reviewed mostly showed examples of descriptive ethics, in that most authors describe ethical issues without reflecting much on them, which could be explained both by 1) a lack of ethical education in research contexts, and 2) by the fact that we do not know what researchers know (or do not) about ethical issues. Additionally, the definitions identified in the publications are scarce and at times imprecise, but this seems more to point out the ethical vocabulary’s difficulties in certain contexts. Further, very few authors offer proper conceptualisations of the ethical issues arising in conducting research. When dealing with vast arrays of ethical issues to conceptualise, perhaps one ought to remember that some typologies already exist that could guide further reflection and help understand other realities for which the current ethical vocabulary may be lacking. We believe that combining the reviewed typologies, both with other well-developed typologies and critical reflection, could help support better ethical practice in conducting research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Critical Enquiry in the Context of Research-Ethics Review Guidelines: Some Unique and Subtle Challenges

Ethical Principles in Healthcare Research

Ethical Issues in Research Methods

References .

Aarsand, P. (2016). Children’s media practises: challenges and dilemmas for the qualitative researcher. Journal of Children and Media, 10 (1), 90–97.

Article   Google Scholar  

Alexander, S., Pillay, R., & Smith, B. (2018). A systematic review of the experiences of vulnerable people participating in research on sensitive topics. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 88 , 85–96.

Al-Hidabi, M. D. A. (2018). Multiple Publications: The Main Reason for the Retraction of Papers in Computer Science. In K. Arai, S. Kapoor, & R. Bhatia (Eds), Future of Information and Communication Conference (FICC): Advances in Information and Communication, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (AISC, vol. 886) (pp. 511‒526). New York: Springer.

Bahn, S. (2012). Keeping Academic Field Researchers Safe: Ethical Safeguards. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10 , 83–91.

Balk, D. E. (1995). Bereavement Research Using Control Groups: Ethical Obligations and Questions. Death Studies, 19 , 123–138.

Banister, S. (2007). Ethical Issues and Qualitative Methods in the 21st Century: How Can Digital Technologies Be Embraced in the Research Community? Journal of Ethnographic and Qualitative Research, 1 , 1–10.

Google Scholar  

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2012). The Principles of Biomedical Ethics (7 th ed.), New York: Oxford University Press.

Birchley, G., Huxtable, R., Murtagh, M., ter Meulen, R., Flach, P., & Gooberman-Hill, R. (2017). Smart homes, private homes? An empirical study of technology researchers’ perceptions of ethical issues in developing smart-home health technologies. BMC Medical Ethics, 18 (23), 1–13.

Bouffard, C. (2000). Le développement des pratiques de la génétique médicale et la construction des normes bioéthiques. Anthropologie et Sociétés, 24 (2), 73–90.

Boutin-Ganache, I. (2007). Plaidoyer pour un élargissement des pratiques de l’éthique de la recherche. Les ateliers de l’éthique, 2 (2), 52–61.

Bruhn, J. G., Zajac, G., Al-Kazemi, A. A., & Prescott Jr., L. D. (2002). Moral Positions and Academic Conduct. The Journal of Higher Education, 73 (4), 461–493.

Butler, J. (2007). Interview with Judith Butler Gender Trouble: Still Revolutionary or Obsolete? http://www.fahamu.org/mbbc/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/BangBang2007InterviewwithJudithButler.pdf . Accessed 05 July 2020.

Colnerud, G. (2015). Ethical dilemmas in research in relation to ethical review: An empirical study. Research Ethics, 10 (4), 238–253.

Conseil de recherches en sciences humaines (CRSH), Conseil de recherches en sciences naturelles et en génie du Canada (CRSNG), Instituts de recherche en santé du Canada (IRSC). (2018). Énoncé de politique des trois Conseils : Éthique de la recherche avec des êtres humains (EPTC2) . Retrieved from https://ethics.gc.ca/fra/documents/tcps2-2018-fr-interactive-final.pdf . Accessed 06 July 2020.

Côté, J. (2012). Les enjeux éthiques de l’utilisation d’internet en recherche: principales questions et pistes de solutions. Éthique publique, 14 (2), 12.

Davison, J. (2004). Dilemmas in Research: Issues of Vulnerability and Disempowerment for the Social Workers/Researcher. Journal of Social Work Practice, 18 (3), 379–393.

De Villers, M. É. (2009). Multi-dictionnaire de la langue française . (5th ed.). Québec Amérique.

Degavre, F., & Saussey, M. (2014). La fabrique des chercheur-e-s mise à l’épreuve des normes globales d’éthique. Journal des anthropologues , 136–137.

Donagan, A. (1977). The Theory of Morality . . University of Chicago Press.

Book   Google Scholar  

Drolet, M. J., & Girard, K. (2020). Les enjeux éthiques de la recherche en ergothérapie: un portrait préoccupant. Revue canadienne de bioéthique, 3 (3), 21–40.

Drolet, M. J. (2014). De l’éthique à l’ergothérapie : La philosophie au service de la pratique ergothérapique . (2nd ed.). Presses de l’Université du Québec.

Eide, P., & Kahn, D. (2008). Ethical Issues in the Qualitative Researcher-Participant Relationship. Nursing Ethics, 15 (2), 199–207.

Engelhardt, H. T. (1988). Foreword. In V. R. Potter (Ed.), Global Bioethics: Building on the Leopold Legacy (pp. vii ‒ xii ). Michigan. Michigan State University Press.

Erzinçlioglu, Z. (1999). British Universities: An Ethical Dilemma. Contemporary Review , 143–147.

Fraser, D. M. (1997). Ethical dilemmas and practical problems for the practitioner researcher. Educational Action Research, 5 (1), 161–171.

Fulford, K. W. M. (2004). Facts/Values: Ten Principles of Values-Based Medicine. In J. Radden (Ed.), The Philosophy of Psychiatry: A Companion. (pp. 205–234). Oxford University Press.

Giorgini, V., Mecca, J. T., Gibson, C., Medeiros, K., Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., et al. (2016). Researcher Perceptions of Ethical Guidelines and Codes of Conduct. Accountability in Research, 22 (3), 123–138.

Goodrich, K. M., & Luke, M. (2017). Ethical Issues in the Research of Group Work. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 42 (1), 108–129.

Goulet, M., & Drolet, M. J. (2018). Les enjeux éthiques en réadaptation. Un état des lieux de la conceptualisation de notions éthiques. Canadian Journal of Bioethics ,  1 (3), 9–21.

Grinyer, A. (2001). Ethical Dilemmas in Nonclinical Health Research from a UK Perspective. Nursing Ethics, 8 (2), 123–132.

Hansson, S. O. (2017). The Ethics of Doing Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23 , 102–120.

Henderson, M., Johnson, N. F., & Auld, G. (2013). Silences of ethical practice: dilemmas for researchers using social media. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19 (6), 546–560.

Holian, R., & Coghlan, D. (2013). Ethical Issues and Role Duality in Insider Action Research: Challenges for Action Research Degree Programmes. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 26 (16), 399–415.

Honderich, T. (Ed.). (2005). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy . (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Hunter, R. F., Gough, A., O’Kane, N., McKeown, G., Fitzpatrick, A., Walker, T., et al. (2018). Ethical Issues in Social Media Research for Public Health. AJPH Law & Ethics, 108 (3), 343–348.

Jameton, A. (1984). Nursing Practice: The Ethical Issues . Prentice-Hall.

Jarvis, K. (2017). Dilemmas in International Research and the Value of Practical Wisdom. Developing World Bioethics, 17 (1), 50–58.

Jennings, M. M., & El-adaway, I. H. (2012). Ethical Issues in Multiple-Authored and Mentor-Supervised Publications. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice , 37–47.

Kellehear, A. (1998). Ethical Issues for the Qualitative Researcher: Some Critical Reflections. Annual Review of Health Social Science, 8 (1), 14–18.

Kimmelman, J. (2005). Medical Research, Risk, and Bystanders. IRB Ethics & Human Research, 27 (4), 1–6.

Laplante, B. (2005). Cheminement éthique d’un chercheur engagé en recherche collaborative. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 31 (2), 417–440.

Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (2011). Working in Research Teams: Lessons from Personal Experiences. Management and Organization Review, 7 (3), 461–469.

Les Fonds de recherche du Québec (FRQ). (2014). Politique sur la conduite responsable en recherche . Retrieved from http://www.frqs.gouv.qc.ca/documents/10191/186005/Politique+sur+la+CRR_FRQ_2014.pdf/4e383bf5-95f6-45c2-be65-08879f8788a1 . Accessed 06 July 2020.

Lierville, A. L., Grou, C., & Pelletier, J. F. (2015). Enjeux éthiques potentiels liés aux partenariats patients en psychiatrie: état de situation à l’institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal. Santé mentale au Québec, 40 , 119–134.

Locke, T., Alcorn, N., & O’Neill, J. (2013). Ethical issues in collaborative action research. Educational Action Research, 21 (1), 107–123.

Lomas Scott, C., & Foncesca, L. (2010). Overstepping the mark: ethics procedures, risky research and education researchers. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 33 (3), 287–300.

Lynöe, N., Sandlund, M., & Jacobsons, L. (1999). Research ethics committees: a comparative study of assessment of ethical dilemmas. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 2 , 152–159.

Madhan, M., Kimidi, S. S., Gunasekaran, S., & Arunachalam, S. (2017). Should Indian researchers pay to get their work published? Current Science, 112 (4), 703–713.

McConnell, T. (2018). Moral Dilemmas. In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy : https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/moral-dilemmas/ . Accessed 5 July 2020.

McCullough, L. B., Coverdale, J. H., & Chervenak, F. A. (2007). Constructing a Systematic Review for Argument-Based Clinical Ethics Literature: The Example of Concealed Medications. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 32 (1), 65–76.

McCullough, L. B., Coverdale, J. H., & Chervenak, F. A. (2004). Argument-based Medical Ethics: A Formal Tool for Critically Appraising the Normative Medical Ethics Literature. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 191 (4), 1097–1102.

Merritt, M. (2005). Moral Conflict in Clinical Trials. Ethics, 115 , 306–330.

Mills, C. W. (2005). “Ideal Theory” as Ideology. Hypatia, 20 (3), 165–184.

Mish, F. C. (Ed.). (2014). Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary . (11th ed.). Merriam-Webster.

Molyneux, S., Tsofa, B., Barasa, E., Nyikuri, M. M., Waweru, E. W., Goodman, C., et al. (2016). Research Involving Health Providers and Managers: Ethical Issues Faced by Researchers Conducting Diverse Health Policy and Systems Research in Kenya. Developing World Bioethics, 16 (3), 168–177.

Mondain, N., & Arzouma Bologo, É. (2009). L’intentionnalité du chercheur dans ses pratiques de production de connaissances : les enjeux soulevés par la construction des données en démographie et santé en Afrique. Cahiers de recherche sociologique, 48 , 175–203.

Morelle, M., & Ripoll, F. (2009). Les chercheur-es face aux injustices: l’enquête de terrain comme épreuve éthique. Annales de géographie, 1 (665–666), 157–168.

Mortari, L., & Harcourt, D. (2012). ‘Living’ ethical dilemmas for researchers when researching with children. International Journal of Early Years Education, 20 (3), 234–243.

Neves, T., Holligan, C., & Deuchar, R. (2018). Reflections concerning ethnographic ethical decisions and neo-liberal monitoring. Etnográfica, 22 (2), 241–258.

Novelskaitė, A., Pučėtaitė, R., & Lipnevič, A. (2011). Defining Research Ethics Legally: Liaison between International and National Documents. The Case of Safety of the Researcher as a Research Ethics Issue. The International Journal of Science in Society , 2 (3), 219–234.

Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2000). Ethics in Qualitative Research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33 (1), 93–96.

Parr, M. (2010). Solving ethical dilemmas with children: Empowering classroom research. McGill Journal of Education, 45 (3), 451–462.

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice . Harvard University Press.

Rawls, J. (1999). The Law of Peoples . Harvard University Press.

Resnik, D. B., & Elliott, K. C. (2016). The Ethical Challenges of Socially Responsible Science. Accountability in Research, 23 (1), 31–46.

Ross, W. D. (1930). The Right and the Good . Oxford University Press.

Scott-Jones, D. (1994). Ethical Issues in Reporting and Referring in Research with Low-Income Minority Children. Ethics & Behavior, 4 (2), 97–108.

Shepherd, L. L., Read, K., & Chen, D. T. (2013). Children Enrolled in Parents’ Research: A Uniquely Vulnerable Group in Need of Oversight and Protection. IRB Ethics & Human Research, 35 (3), 1–8.

Sieber, J. E. (2004). Empirical Research on Research Ethics. Ethics & Behavior, 14 (4), 397–412.

Steneck, N. H. (2004). ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research , U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Office of Research Integrity. Retrieved from https://ori.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/2018-04/rcrintro.pdf . Accessed 06 July 2020.

Swazey, J. P., Anderson, M. S., Seashore Lewis, K., & Seashore Louis, K. (1993). Ethical Problems in Academic Research. American Scientist, 81 (6), 542–553.

Swisher, L. L., Arslanian, L. E., & Davis, C. M. (2005). The Realm-Individual Process-Situation (RIPS) Model of Ethical Decision-Making. HPA Resource, 5 (3), 1–8.

Tatebe, J. (2015). The Ethics of Difference: Ethical Dilemmas of External Researchers. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13 , 229–237.

Tessman, L. (2015). Moral Failure: On the Impossible Demands of Morality . Oxford University Press.

Thompson, J. (2003). Ethical challenges of informed consent in prehospital research. CJEM, 5 (2), 108–114.

Wasamba, P. (2009). Fieldwork in a conflicted society: A contemporary researcher’s ethical dilemma. International Journal of African Renaissance Studies, 4 (2), 193–204.

White, J., & Fitzgerald, T. (2010). Researcher tales and research ethics: the spaces in which we find ourselves. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 33 (3), 273–285.

Williams-Jones, B., Potvin, M. J., Mathieu, G., & Smith, E. (2013). Barriers to research on research ethics review and conflicts of interest. IRB: Ethics & Human Research , 35 (5), 14–20.

Yee, W. C., & Andrews, J. (2006). Professional researcher or a ‘good guest’? Ethical dilemmas involved in researching children and families in the home setting. Educational Review, 58 (4), 397–413.

Yip, C., Reena Han, N. L., & Leong Sng, B. (2016). Legal and ethical issues in research. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 60 (19), 684–688.

Zgaga, P. (2018). Researchers and research ethics: Between fears of the expansion of controversial practices and the strengthening of ethical awareness. European Educational Research Journal , 1–13.

Further Reading

Borchard, K. (2012). Ethics and Studying Homelessness: Tales from the Field. In A. Randall, & V. Trenna (Eds), Professional Lives, Personal Strugles: Ethics and Advocacy in Research on Homelessness (pp. 60–67). Lexington Books.

Chung, R. (2013). Théories idéale et non idéale. In J.-B. Jeangène Vilmer (Ed.), Éthique des relations internationales: Problématiques contemporaines (pp. 63‒92). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Lourau, R. (1995). Chercheur surimpliqué. L’homme et la société, 115 , 39–46.

McGinn, R. (2013). Discernment and Denial: Nanotechnology Researchers’ Recognition of Ethical Responsibilities Related to Their Work. NanoEthics, 7 , 93–105.

Mesny, A., & Marcoux, J. S. (2009). La recherche en gestion et les comités d’éthique : l’épreuve de la pratique. Cahiers de recherche sociologique, 48 , 111–127.

Miyazaki, A. D., & Taylor, K. A. (2008). Researcher Interaction Biases and Business Ethics Research: Respondent Reactions to Researcher Characteristics. Journal of Business Ethics, 81 (4), 779–795.

Nickels, S., & Knotsch, C. (2011). Inuit perspectives on research ethics: The work of Inuit Nipingit. Études/Inuit/Studies, 35 (1–2), 57–81.

Poole, H., Giles, D. C., & Moore, K. (2004). Researching sexuality and sexual issues: implications for the researcher? Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 19 (1), 79–86.

Savage, S. L. (2016). Ethics and the Academy: Researchers on the Edge. Studies in Art Education, 67 (4), 375–378.

Sigmon, S. T. (1995). Ethical Practices and Beliefs of Psychopathology Researchers. Ethics & Behavior, 5 (4), 295–309.

Simmons, J. A. (2010). Ideal and Nonideal Theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 38 (1), 5–36.

Valentini, L. (2012). Ideal vs. Non-Ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map. Philosophy Compass, 7 (9), 654–64.

Vogel, L. (2017). Researchers may be part of the problem in predatory publishing. CMAJ, 189 (42), E1324–E1325.

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors warmly thank Guy Trépanier, Librarian affiliated with the Department of Philosophy and Arts at the Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, for his invaluable help in choosing the appropriate keywords to use in the databases. Marie-Josée Drolet and Bryn Williams-Jones were supported by a SSHRC grant to conduct this research.

SSHRC provided a grant to conduct this research.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Philosophy, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (UQTR), Trois-Rivières, Canada

Élie Beauchemin & Louis Pierre Côté

Department of Occupational Therapy, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (UQTR), Trois-Rivières, Canada

Marie-Josée Drolet

Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada

Bryn Williams-Jones

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie-Josée Drolet .

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest.

None to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Beauchemin, É., Côté, L.P., Drolet, MJ. et al. Conceptualising Ethical Issues in the Conduct of Research: Results from a Critical and Systematic Literature Review. J Acad Ethics 20 , 335–358 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09411-7

Download citation

Accepted : 18 March 2021

Published : 27 April 2021

Issue Date : September 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09411-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Ethical issues
• Conceptualisation
• Research ethics
• Ethical typologies
• Literature review
• Ethical normative grounds

Advertisement

• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research