what is deductive reasoning in critical thinking

Jessie Ball duPont Library

Critical thinking skills, what is deductive reasoning.

Logical Fallacies
Need Research Help?

Research Librarian

Deductive reasoning: conclusion guaranteed Deductive reasoning starts with the assertion of a general rule and proceeds from there to a guaranteed specific conclusion. Deductive reasoning moves from the general rule to the specific application: In deductive reasoning, if the original assertions are true, then the conclusion must also be true. For example, math is deductive:

If x = 4 And if y = 1 Then 2x + y = 9

In this example, it is a logical necessity that 2x + y equals 9; 2x + y must equal 9. As a matter of fact, formal, symbolic logic uses a language that looks rather like the math equation above, complete with its own operators and syntax. But a deductive syllogism (think of it as a plain-English version of a math equality) can be expressed in ordinary language:

If entropy (disorder) in a system will increase unless energy is expended, And if my living room is a system, Then disorder will increase in my living room unless I clean it.

In the syllogism above, the first two statements, the propositions or premises , lead logically to the third statement, the conclusion . Here is another example:

A medical technology ought to be funded if it has been used successfully to treat patients. Adult stem cells are being used to treat patients successfully in more than sixty-five new therapies. Adult stem cell research and technology should be funded.

A conclusion is sound (true) or unsound (false), depending on the truth of the original premises (for any premise may be true or false). At the same time, independent of the truth or falsity of the premises, the deductive inference itself (the process of "connecting the dots" from premise to conclusion) is either valid or invalid . The inferential process can be valid even if the premise is false:

There is no such thing as drought in the West. California is in the West. California need never make plans to deal with a drought.

In the example above, though the inferential process itself is valid, the conclusion is false because the premise, There is no such thing as drought in the West , is false. A syllogism yields a false conclusion if either of its propositions is false. A syllogism like this is particularly insidious because it looks so very logical–it is, in fact, logical. But whether in error or malice, if either of the propositions above is wrong, then a policy decision based upon it ( California need never make plans to deal with a drought ) probably would fail to serve the public interest.

Assuming the propositions are sound, the rather stern logic of deductive reasoning can give you absolutely certain conclusions. However, deductive reasoning cannot really increase human knowledge (it is nonampliative ) because the conclusions yielded by deductive reasoning are tautologies - statements that are contained within the premises and virtually self-evident. Therefore, while with deductive reasoning we can make observations and expand implications, we cannot make predictions about future or otherwise non-observed phenomena.

<< Previous: Home
Next: Induction >>
Last Updated: Aug 15, 2024 6:00 PM
URL: https://library.sewanee.edu/critical_thinking

Research Tools

Find Articles
Find Research Guides
Find Databases
Ask a Librarian
Learn Research Skills
How-To Videos
Borrow from Another Library (Sewanee ILL)
Find Audio and Video
Find Reserves
Access Electronic Resources

Services for...

College Students
The School of Theology
The School of Letters
Community Members

Spaces & Places

Center for Leadership
Center for Speaking and Listening
Center for Teaching
Floor Maps & Locations
Ralston Listening Library
Request a Table Event
Research Help
Study Spaces
Tech Help Desk
Writing Center

About the Library

Where is the Library?
News and Reports
Library Collections
New Items & Themed Collections
Library Policies
Library Staff
Friends of the Library

Jessie Ball duPont Library, University of the South

178 Georgia Avenue, Sewanee, TN 37383

931.598.1664

Mathematics
Number System and Arithmetic
Trigonometry
Probability
Mensuration
Maths Formulas

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive reasoning is a basic aspect of logical thinking. It allows individuals to draw valid conclusions based on given premises. It involves applying established rules or patterns to reach logical outcomes. Deductive reasoning helps us in solving puzzles to making decisions in various aspects of daily life.

In this article, we will explore the concept of deductive reasoning, its importance, types, and practical applications.

Table of Content

What is Deductive Reasoning?

Types of deductive reasoning.

How to Solve Deductive Reasoning?

Deductive Reasoning vs Inductive Reasoning

Application of deductive reasoning, deductive reasoning solved examples.

Deductive reasoning is a logical process where one draws a specific conclusion from a general premise. It involves using general principles or accepted truths to reach a specific conclusion.

For example, if the premise is "All birds have wings," and the specific observation is "Robins are birds," then deducing that "Robins have wings" is a logical conclusion.

In deductive reasoning, the conclusion is necessarily true if the premises are true.
It follows a top-down approach, starting with general principles and applying them to specific situations to derive conclusions.
Deductive reasoning is often used in formal logic, where the validity of arguments is assessed based on the structure of the reasoning rather than the content.
It helps in making predictions and solving puzzles by systematically eliminating possibilities until only one logical solution remains.

Different types of deductive reasoning are based on the premises and the kind of relationship across the premises.

The three different types of deductive reasoning are

Modus ponens
Modus tollens

These three types of deductive reasoning provide structured methods for drawing logical conclusions based on given premises.

Syllogism is a form of deductive reasoning that involves drawing conclusions from two premises, typically in the form of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion. It follows a logical structure where if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true.

In syllogism, the major premise establishes a general statement, the minor premise provides a specific instance, and the conclusion follows logically from these premises. For example:

Major premise: All humans are mortal.
Minor premise: Socrates is a human.
Conclusion: Therefore, Socrates is mortal.

Modus Ponens

Modus Ponens is a deductive reasoning pattern that asserts the truth of a conclusion if the premises are true. It follows the format of "if P, then Q; P; therefore, Q."

In Modus Ponens, if the first premise (conditional statement) is true and the second premise (antecedent) is also true, then the conclusion (consequent) must logically follow. For example:

Premise 1: If it rains, then the streets will be wet.
Premise 2: It is raining.
Conclusion: Therefore, the streets are wet.

Modus Tollens

Modus Tollens is another deductive reasoning pattern that denies the truth of the consequent if the premises are true. It follows the format of "if P, then Q; not Q; therefore, not P."

In Modus Tollens, if the first premise (conditional statement) is true and the consequent is not true, then the antecedent must also be false. For example:

Premise 1: If it is a weekday, then John goes to work.
Premise 2: John is not going to work.
Conclusion: Therefore, it is not a weekday.

How to Solve Deductive Reasoning ?

To solve deductive reasoning problems, we follow these simple steps:

Step 1: Carefully read and understand the given premises or statements.

Step 2 : Look for logical patterns or relationships between the premises and the conclusion.

Step 3 : Use deductive reasoning rules like syllogism, modus ponens, or modus tollens to derive conclusions.

Step 4: Ensure that the conclusions logically follow from the given premises.

Step 5: Explore different possibilities and scenarios to verify the validity of the conclusions.

Here are the differences between deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning:

Deductive reasoning plays an important role in various fields, heling in logical thinking, problem-solving, and decision-making processes. Here are some of the applications of Deductive Reasoning :

Deductive reasoning helps break down complex problems into manageable parts and derive logical solutions.
It is widely used in geometry, algebra, and logic to prove theorems and solve mathematical problems.
Scientists use deductive reasoning to formulate hypotheses, design experiments, and draw conclusions based on empirical evidence.
Deductive reasoning is fundamental in philosophical arguments and debates, guiding logical analysis and critical thinking.
Lawyers use deductive reasoning to build cases, establish arguments, and interpret laws and regulations.
Programmers apply deductive reasoning to develop algorithms, write code, and debug software.
Teachers use deductive reasoning to design lesson plans, explain concepts, and assess students' understanding.

Example 1: Identify the conclusion drawn from the following syllogism: "All mammals are warm-blooded. Elephants are mammals. Therefore, elephants are warm-blooded."

Conclusion drawn from the syllogism is that elephants are warm-blooded. This conclusion follows logically from the two premises provided: "All mammals are warm-blooded" and "Elephants are mammals." Since elephants fall within the category of mammals, they inherit the characteristic of being warm-blooded.

Example 2: Apply modus ponens to the following premises: "If it rains, then the ground is wet. It is raining." What conclusion can be drawn?

Modus ponens asserts that if the first statement is true and the second statement follows from it, then the conclusion is true. In this case, the premises are "If it rains, then the ground is wet" (first statement) and "It is raining" (second statement). Therefore, the conclusion drawn is "Therefore, the ground is wet."

Example 3: Utilize modus tollens with the given premises: "If the battery is dead, then the car won't start. The car starts." What conclusion can be derived?

Modus tollens asserts that if the second statement is false and the first statement implies it, then the first statement must also be false. In this scenario, the premises are "If the battery is dead, then the car won't start" (first statement) and "The car starts" (second statement). Therefore, the conclusion drawn is "Therefore, the battery is not dead."

Example 4: Analyze the following syllogism: "All A are B. All B are C. Therefore, all A are C." Is the conclusion valid? Why or why not?

Conclusion "Therefore, all A are C" is valid. It follows the logical structure of the syllogism, where if all A are B and all B are C, then it logically follows that all A are C. This type of deductive reasoning is known as transitive reasoning.

FAQs on Deductive Reasoning

What is deductive reasoning.

Deductive reasoning involves drawing logical conclusions from premises that are assumed to be true.

How does deductive reasoning differ from inductive reasoning?

Deductive reasoning moves from general principles to specific conclusions, while inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to general principles.

What are some types of deductive reasoning?

Types of deductive reasoning include syllogism, modus ponens, and modus tollens, where conclusions are drawn based on logical rules.

Why is deductive reasoning important?

Deductive reasoning ensures the validity of logical arguments and helps make sound conclusions based on known premises.

What are the characteristics of deductive reasoning?

Deductive reasoning produces certain conclusions if the premises are true and follows a top-down approach.

How can deductive reasoning be applied in everyday life?

It can be used in problem-solving, decision-making, and logical analysis of various situations and arguments.