single case research methods

Single-Case Intervention Research

Available from.

Table of contents
Contributor bios
Reviews and awards
Book details

Thanks to remarkable methodological and statistical advances in recent years, single-case design (SCD) research has become a viable and often essential option for researchers in applied psychology, education, and related fields.

This text is a compendium of information and tools for researchers considering SCD research, a methodology in which one or several participants (or other units) comprise a systematically-controlled experimental intervention study. SCD is a highly flexible method of conducting applied intervention research where it is not feasible or practical to collect data from traditional groups of participants.

Initial chapters lay out the key components of SCDs, from articulating dependent variables to documenting methods for achieving experimental control and selecting an appropriate design model. Subsequent chapters show when and how to implement SCDs in a variety of contexts and how to analyze and interpret results.

Authors emphasize key design and analysis tactics, such as randomization, to help enhance the internal validity and scientific credibility of individual studies. This rich resource also includes in-depth descriptions of large-scale SCD research projects being undertaken at key institutions; practical suggestions from journal editors on how to get SCD research published; and detailed instructions for free, user-friendly, web-based randomization software.

Contributors

Series Foreword

Acknowledgements

Introduction: An Overview of Single-Case Intervention Research Thomas R. Kratochwill and Joel R. Levin

I. Methodologies and Analyses

Constructing Single-Case Research Designs: Logic and Options Robert H. Horner and Samuel L. Odom
Enhancing the Scientific Credibility of Single-Case Intervention Research: Randomization to the Rescue Thomas R. Kratochwill and Joel R. Levin
Visual Analysis of Single-Case Intervention Research: Conceptual and Methodological Issues Thomas R. Kratochwill, Joel R. Levin, Robert H. Horner, and Christopher M. Swoboda
Non-Overlap Analysis for Single-Case Research Richard I. Parker, Kimberly J. Vannest, and John L. Davis
Single-Case Permutation and Randomization Statistical Tests: Present Status, Promising New Developments John M. Ferron and Joel R. Levin
The Single-Case Data-Analysis ExPRT ( Excel Package of Randomization Tests ) Joel R. Levin, Anya S. Evmenova, and Boris S. Gafurov
Using Multilevel Models to Analyze Single-Case Design Data David M. Rindskopf and John M. Ferron
Analyzing Single-Case Designs: d , G , Hierarchical Models, Bayesian Estimators, Generalized Additive Models, and the Hopes and Fears of Researchers About Analyses William R. Shadish, Larry V. Hedges, James E. Pustejovsky, David M. Rindskopf, Jonathan G. Boyajian, and Kristynn J. Sullivan
The Role of Single-Case Designs in Supporting Rigorous Intervention Development and Evaluation at the Institute of Education Sciences Jacquelyn A. Buckley, Deborah L. Speece, and Joan E. McLaughlin

II. Reactions From Leaders in the Field

Single-Case Designs and Large- N Studies: The Best of Both Worlds Susan M. Sheridan
Using Single-Case Research Designs in Programs of Research Ann P. Kaiser
Reactions From Journal Editors: Journal of School Psychology Randy G. Floyd
Reactions From Journal Editors: School Psychology Quarterly Randy W. Kamphaus
Reactions From Journal Editors: School Psychology Review Matthew K. Burns

About the Editors

Thomas R. Kratochwill, PhD, is Sears Roebuck Foundation–Bascom Professor at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, director of the School Psychology Program, and a licensed psychologist in Wisconsin.

He is the author of more than 200 journal articles and book chapters. He has written or edited more than 30 books and has made more than 300 professional presentations.

In 1977 he received the Lightner Witmer Award from APA Division 16 (School Psychology). In 1981 he received the Outstanding Research Contributions Award from the Arizona State Psychological Association and in 1995 received an award for Outstanding Contributions to the Advancement of Scientific Knowledge in Psychology from the Wisconsin Psychological Association. Also in 1995, he was the recipient of the Senior Scientist Award from APA Division 16, and the Wisconsin Psychological Association selected his research for its Margaret Bernauer Psychology Research Award.

In 1995, 2001, and 2002 the APA Division 16 journal School Psychology Quarterly selected one of his articles as the best of the year. In 2005 he received the Jack I. Bardon Distinguished Achievement Award from APA Division 16. He was selected as the founding editor of School Psychology Quarterly in 1984 and served as editor of the journal until 1992.

In 2011 Dr. Kratochwill received the Lifetime Achievement Award from the National Register of Health Service Providers in Psychology and the Nadine Murphy Lambert Lifetime Achievement Award from APA Division 16.

Dr. Kratochwill is a fellow of APA Divisions 15 (Educational Psychology), 16, and 53 (Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology). He is past president of the Society for the Study of School Psychology and was cochair of the Task Force on Evidence-Based Interventions in School Psychology. He was also a member of the APA Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice for Children and Adolescents and the recipient of the 2007 APA Distinguished Career Contributions to Education and Training of Psychologists.

He is the recipient of the University of Wisconsin–Madison Van Hise Outreach Teaching Award and a member of the University's teaching academy. Most recently he has chaired the What Works Clearinghouse Panel for the development of Standards for Single-Case Research Design for review of evidence-based interventions.

Joel R. Levin, PhD, is Professor Emeritus of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin–Madison and University of Arizona. He is internationally renowned for his research and writing on educational research methodology and statistical analysis as well as for his career-long program of research on students' learning strategies and study skills, with more than 400 scholarly publications in those domains. Within APA, he is a Fellow of Division 5 (Evaluation, Measurement and Statistics) and Division 15 (Educational Psychology).

From 1986 to 1988 Dr. Levin was head of the Learning and Instruction division of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), from 1991 to 1996 he was editor of APA's Journal of Educational Psychology , and from 2001 to 2003 he was coeditor of the journal Issues in Education: Contributions From Educational Psychology . During 1994–1995 he served as chair of APA's Council of Editors, and from 1993 to 1995 he was an ex-officio representative on APA's Publications and Communications Board.

Dr. Levin chaired an editors' committee that revised the statistical-reporting guidelines sections for the fourth (1994) edition of the APA Publication Manual , and he served on a similar committee that revised the fifth (2001) and sixth (2010) editions of the manual. From 2003 to 2008 he was APA's chief editorial advisor, a position in which he was responsible for mediating editor–author conflicts, managing ethical violations, and making recommendations bearing on all aspects of the scholarly research and publication process.

Dr. Levin has received two article-of-the-year awards from AERA (1972, with Leonard Marascuilo; 1973, with William Rohwer and Anne Cleary) as well as awards from the University of Wisconsin–Madison for both his teaching and his research (1971 and 1980). In 1992 he was presented with a University of Wisconsin–Madison award for his combined research, teaching, and professional service contributions, followed in 1996 by a prestigious University of Wisconsin–Madison named professorship (Julian C. Stanley Chair).

In 1997 the University of Wisconsin–Madison's School of Education honored Dr. Levin with a distinguished career award, and in 2002 he was accorded APA Division 15's highest research recognition, the E. L. Thorndike Award, for his professional achievements. In 2010 AERA's Educational Statisticians Special Interest Group presented him with an award for exceptional contributions to the field of educational statistics, and most recently, in 2013 the editorial board of the Journal of School Psychology selected his 2012 publication (with John Ferron and Thomas Kratochwill) as the Journal's outstanding article of the year.

A well-written and meaningfully structured compendium that includes the foundational and advanced guidelines for conducting accurate single-case intervention designs. Whether you are an undergraduate or a graduate student, or an applied researcher anywhere along the novice-to-expert column, this book promises to be an invaluable addition to your library. —PsycCRITIQUES

Provides valuable information about single case research design for researchers and graduate students, including methodology, statistical analyses, and the opinions of researchers who have been using it. —Doody's Review Service

This is a welcome addition to the libraries of behavioral researchers interested in knowing more about the lives of children inside and outside of school. Kratochwill and Levin and their contributing authors blend the sometimes esoteric issues of the philosophy of science, experimental design, and statistics with the real-life issues of how to get grant funding and publish research. This volume is useful for new and experienced researchers alike. —Ilene S. Schwartz, PhD, professor, University of Washington, Seattle, and director, Haring Center for Research on Inclusive Education, Seattle, WA

Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings

Published 9 February 2010

2,708 Citations

Single-case experimental designs. evaluating interventions in research and clinical practice., integrating routine clinical interventions with single-case methodology: parallels, differences and bridging strategies, enhancing the scientific credibility of single-case intervention research: randomization to the rescue., single case designs in clinical practice: a contemporary cbs perspective on why and how to, special issue on advances in single-case research design and analysis, single-case design, analysis, and quality assessment for intervention research., single-case experimental designs: reflections on conduct and analysis, single-case experimental designs to evaluate novel technology-based health interventions.

Highly Influenced

Applying Empirical Methods in Clinical Practice: Introducing the Model for Assessing Treatment Effect

A comparison of rubrics for identifying empirically supported practices with single-case research, 31 references, avoiding treatment failures in the anxiety disorders, clinical assessment of child and adolescent personality and behavior., the twenty-four hour mind: the role of sleep and dreaming in our emotional lives, getting together: building relationships as we negotiate, adobe photoshop 6.0 classroom in a book, counselling ideologies: queer challenges to heteronormativity, quaker spirituality: selected writings, farmers of forty centuries, or permanent agriculture in china, korea and japan, related papers.

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

Single Case Research Methodology

DOI link for Single Case Research Methodology

Get Citation

Single Case Research Methodology, 3 rd Edition presents a thorough, technically sound, user-friendly, and comprehensive discussion of single case research methodology. This book can serve as a detailed and complex reference tool for students, researchers, and practitioners who intend to conduct single case research design studies; interpret findings of single case design studies; or write proposals, manuscripts, or reviews of single case methodology research. The authors present a variety of single case research studies with a wide range of participants, including preschoolers, K-12 students, university students, and adults in a variety of childcare, school, clinical, and community settings, making the book relevant across multiple disciplines in social, educational, and behavioral science including special and general education; school, child, clinical, and neuropsychology; speech, occupational, recreation, and physical therapy; and social work.

Chapter 1 | 26 pages, research approaches in applied settings, chapter 2 | 16 pages, ethical principles and practices in research, chapter 3 | 34 pages, writing tasks, chapter 4 | 19 pages, replication, chapter 5 | 35 pages, dependent variables, measurement, and reliability, chapter 6 | 24 pages, independent variables, fidelity, and social validity, chapter 7 | 22 pages, visual representation of data, chapter 8 | 36 pages, visual analysis of graphic data, chapter 9 | 24 pages, withdrawal and reversal designs, chapter 10 | 43 pages, multiple baseline and multiple probe designs, chapter 11 | 52 pages, comparative designs, chapter 12 | 30 pages, combination and other designs, chapter 13 | 28 pages, evaluating quality and rigor in single case research, chapter 14 | 24 pages, synthesis and meta-analysis of single case research.

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Taylor & Francis Online
Taylor & Francis Group
Students/Researchers
Librarians/Institutions

Connect with us

The Advantages and Limitations of Single Case Study Analysis

As Andrew Bennett and Colin Elman have recently noted, qualitative research methods presently enjoy “an almost unprecedented popularity and vitality… in the international relations sub-field”, such that they are now “indisputably prominent, if not pre-eminent” (2010: 499). This is, they suggest, due in no small part to the considerable advantages that case study methods in particular have to offer in studying the “complex and relatively unstructured and infrequent phenomena that lie at the heart of the subfield” (Bennett and Elman, 2007: 171). Using selected examples from within the International Relations literature[1], this paper aims to provide a brief overview of the main principles and distinctive advantages and limitations of single case study analysis. Divided into three inter-related sections, the paper therefore begins by first identifying the underlying principles that serve to constitute the case study as a particular research strategy, noting the somewhat contested nature of the approach in ontological, epistemological, and methodological terms. The second part then looks to the principal single case study types and their associated advantages, including those from within the recent ‘third generation’ of qualitative International Relations (IR) research. The final section of the paper then discusses the most commonly articulated limitations of single case studies; while accepting their susceptibility to criticism, it is however suggested that such weaknesses are somewhat exaggerated. The paper concludes that single case study analysis has a great deal to offer as a means of both understanding and explaining contemporary international relations.

The term ‘case study’, John Gerring has suggested, is “a definitional morass… Evidently, researchers have many different things in mind when they talk about case study research” (2006a: 17). It is possible, however, to distil some of the more commonly-agreed principles. One of the most prominent advocates of case study research, Robert Yin (2009: 14) defines it as “an empirical enquiry that investigates a contemporary phenomenon in depth and within its real-life context, especially when the boundaries between phenomenon and context are not clearly evident”. What this definition usefully captures is that case studies are intended – unlike more superficial and generalising methods – to provide a level of detail and understanding, similar to the ethnographer Clifford Geertz’s (1973) notion of ‘thick description’, that allows for the thorough analysis of the complex and particularistic nature of distinct phenomena. Another frequently cited proponent of the approach, Robert Stake, notes that as a form of research the case study “is defined by interest in an individual case, not by the methods of inquiry used”, and that “the object of study is a specific, unique, bounded system” (2008: 443, 445). As such, three key points can be derived from this – respectively concerning issues of ontology, epistemology, and methodology – that are central to the principles of single case study research.

First, the vital notion of ‘boundedness’ when it comes to the particular unit of analysis means that defining principles should incorporate both the synchronic (spatial) and diachronic (temporal) elements of any so-called ‘case’. As Gerring puts it, a case study should be “an intensive study of a single unit… a spatially bounded phenomenon – e.g. a nation-state, revolution, political party, election, or person – observed at a single point in time or over some delimited period of time” (2004: 342). It is important to note, however, that – whereas Gerring refers to a single unit of analysis – it may be that attention also necessarily be given to particular sub-units. This points to the important difference between what Yin refers to as an ‘holistic’ case design, with a single unit of analysis, and an ’embedded’ case design with multiple units of analysis (Yin, 2009: 50-52). The former, for example, would examine only the overall nature of an international organization, whereas the latter would also look to specific departments, programmes, or policies etc.

Secondly, as Tim May notes of the case study approach, “even the most fervent advocates acknowledge that the term has entered into understandings with little specification or discussion of purpose and process” (2011: 220). One of the principal reasons for this, he argues, is the relationship between the use of case studies in social research and the differing epistemological traditions – positivist, interpretivist, and others – within which it has been utilised. Philosophy of science concerns are obviously a complex issue, and beyond the scope of much of this paper. That said, the issue of how it is that we know what we know – of whether or not a single independent reality exists of which we as researchers can seek to provide explanation – does lead us to an important distinction to be made between so-called idiographic and nomothetic case studies (Gerring, 2006b). The former refers to those which purport to explain only a single case, are concerned with particularisation, and hence are typically (although not exclusively) associated with more interpretivist approaches. The latter are those focused studies that reflect upon a larger population and are more concerned with generalisation, as is often so with more positivist approaches[2]. The importance of this distinction, and its relation to the advantages and limitations of single case study analysis, is returned to below.

Thirdly, in methodological terms, given that the case study has often been seen as more of an interpretivist and idiographic tool, it has also been associated with a distinctly qualitative approach (Bryman, 2009: 67-68). However, as Yin notes, case studies can – like all forms of social science research – be exploratory, descriptive, and/or explanatory in nature. It is “a common misconception”, he notes, “that the various research methods should be arrayed hierarchically… many social scientists still deeply believe that case studies are only appropriate for the exploratory phase of an investigation” (Yin, 2009: 6). If case studies can reliably perform any or all three of these roles – and given that their in-depth approach may also require multiple sources of data and the within-case triangulation of methods – then it becomes readily apparent that they should not be limited to only one research paradigm. Exploratory and descriptive studies usually tend toward the qualitative and inductive, whereas explanatory studies are more often quantitative and deductive (David and Sutton, 2011: 165-166). As such, the association of case study analysis with a qualitative approach is a “methodological affinity, not a definitional requirement” (Gerring, 2006a: 36). It is perhaps better to think of case studies as transparadigmatic; it is mistaken to assume single case study analysis to adhere exclusively to a qualitative methodology (or an interpretivist epistemology) even if it – or rather, practitioners of it – may be so inclined. By extension, this also implies that single case study analysis therefore remains an option for a multitude of IR theories and issue areas; it is how this can be put to researchers’ advantage that is the subject of the next section.

Having elucidated the defining principles of the single case study approach, the paper now turns to an overview of its main benefits. As noted above, a lack of consensus still exists within the wider social science literature on the principles and purposes – and by extension the advantages and limitations – of case study research. Given that this paper is directed towards the particular sub-field of International Relations, it suggests Bennett and Elman’s (2010) more discipline-specific understanding of contemporary case study methods as an analytical framework. It begins however, by discussing Harry Eckstein’s seminal (1975) contribution to the potential advantages of the case study approach within the wider social sciences.

Eckstein proposed a taxonomy which usefully identified what he considered to be the five most relevant types of case study. Firstly were so-called configurative-idiographic studies, distinctly interpretivist in orientation and predicated on the assumption that “one cannot attain prediction and control in the natural science sense, but only understanding ( verstehen )… subjective values and modes of cognition are crucial” (1975: 132). Eckstein’s own sceptical view was that any interpreter ‘simply’ considers a body of observations that are not self-explanatory and “without hard rules of interpretation, may discern in them any number of patterns that are more or less equally plausible” (1975: 134). Those of a more post-modernist bent, of course – sharing an “incredulity towards meta-narratives”, in Lyotard’s (1994: xxiv) evocative phrase – would instead suggest that this more free-form approach actually be advantageous in delving into the subtleties and particularities of individual cases.

Eckstein’s four other types of case study, meanwhile, promote a more nomothetic (and positivist) usage. As described, disciplined-configurative studies were essentially about the use of pre-existing general theories, with a case acting “passively, in the main, as a receptacle for putting theories to work” (Eckstein, 1975: 136). As opposed to the opportunity this presented primarily for theory application, Eckstein identified heuristic case studies as explicit theoretical stimulants – thus having instead the intended advantage of theory-building. So-called p lausibility probes entailed preliminary attempts to determine whether initial hypotheses should be considered sound enough to warrant more rigorous and extensive testing. Finally, and perhaps most notably, Eckstein then outlined the idea of crucial case studies , within which he also included the idea of ‘most-likely’ and ‘least-likely’ cases; the essential characteristic of crucial cases being their specific theory-testing function.

Whilst Eckstein’s was an early contribution to refining the case study approach, Yin’s (2009: 47-52) more recent delineation of possible single case designs similarly assigns them roles in the applying, testing, or building of theory, as well as in the study of unique cases[3]. As a subset of the latter, however, Jack Levy (2008) notes that the advantages of idiographic cases are actually twofold. Firstly, as inductive/descriptive cases – akin to Eckstein’s configurative-idiographic cases – whereby they are highly descriptive, lacking in an explicit theoretical framework and therefore taking the form of “total history”. Secondly, they can operate as theory-guided case studies, but ones that seek only to explain or interpret a single historical episode rather than generalise beyond the case. Not only does this therefore incorporate ‘single-outcome’ studies concerned with establishing causal inference (Gerring, 2006b), it also provides room for the more postmodern approaches within IR theory, such as discourse analysis, that may have developed a distinct methodology but do not seek traditional social scientific forms of explanation.

Applying specifically to the state of the field in contemporary IR, Bennett and Elman identify a ‘third generation’ of mainstream qualitative scholars – rooted in a pragmatic scientific realist epistemology and advocating a pluralistic approach to methodology – that have, over the last fifteen years, “revised or added to essentially every aspect of traditional case study research methods” (2010: 502). They identify ‘process tracing’ as having emerged from this as a central method of within-case analysis. As Bennett and Checkel observe, this carries the advantage of offering a methodologically rigorous “analysis of evidence on processes, sequences, and conjunctures of events within a case, for the purposes of either developing or testing hypotheses about causal mechanisms that might causally explain the case” (2012: 10).

Harnessing various methods, process tracing may entail the inductive use of evidence from within a case to develop explanatory hypotheses, and deductive examination of the observable implications of hypothesised causal mechanisms to test their explanatory capability[4]. It involves providing not only a coherent explanation of the key sequential steps in a hypothesised process, but also sensitivity to alternative explanations as well as potential biases in the available evidence (Bennett and Elman 2010: 503-504). John Owen (1994), for example, demonstrates the advantages of process tracing in analysing whether the causal factors underpinning democratic peace theory are – as liberalism suggests – not epiphenomenal, but variously normative, institutional, or some given combination of the two or other unexplained mechanism inherent to liberal states. Within-case process tracing has also been identified as advantageous in addressing the complexity of path-dependent explanations and critical junctures – as for example with the development of political regime types – and their constituent elements of causal possibility, contingency, closure, and constraint (Bennett and Elman, 2006b).

Bennett and Elman (2010: 505-506) also identify the advantages of single case studies that are implicitly comparative: deviant, most-likely, least-likely, and crucial cases. Of these, so-called deviant cases are those whose outcome does not fit with prior theoretical expectations or wider empirical patterns – again, the use of inductive process tracing has the advantage of potentially generating new hypotheses from these, either particular to that individual case or potentially generalisable to a broader population. A classic example here is that of post-independence India as an outlier to the standard modernisation theory of democratisation, which holds that higher levels of socio-economic development are typically required for the transition to, and consolidation of, democratic rule (Lipset, 1959; Diamond, 1992). Absent these factors, MacMillan’s single case study analysis (2008) suggests the particularistic importance of the British colonial heritage, the ideology and leadership of the Indian National Congress, and the size and heterogeneity of the federal state.

Most-likely cases, as per Eckstein above, are those in which a theory is to be considered likely to provide a good explanation if it is to have any application at all, whereas least-likely cases are ‘tough test’ ones in which the posited theory is unlikely to provide good explanation (Bennett and Elman, 2010: 505). Levy (2008) neatly refers to the inferential logic of the least-likely case as the ‘Sinatra inference’ – if a theory can make it here, it can make it anywhere. Conversely, if a theory cannot pass a most-likely case, it is seriously impugned. Single case analysis can therefore be valuable for the testing of theoretical propositions, provided that predictions are relatively precise and measurement error is low (Levy, 2008: 12-13). As Gerring rightly observes of this potential for falsification:

“a positivist orientation toward the work of social science militates toward a greater appreciation of the case study format, not a denigration of that format, as is usually supposed” (Gerring, 2007: 247, emphasis added).

In summary, the various forms of single case study analysis can – through the application of multiple qualitative and/or quantitative research methods – provide a nuanced, empirically-rich, holistic account of specific phenomena. This may be particularly appropriate for those phenomena that are simply less amenable to more superficial measures and tests (or indeed any substantive form of quantification) as well as those for which our reasons for understanding and/or explaining them are irreducibly subjective – as, for example, with many of the normative and ethical issues associated with the practice of international relations. From various epistemological and analytical standpoints, single case study analysis can incorporate both idiographic sui generis cases and, where the potential for generalisation may exist, nomothetic case studies suitable for the testing and building of causal hypotheses. Finally, it should not be ignored that a signal advantage of the case study – with particular relevance to international relations – also exists at a more practical rather than theoretical level. This is, as Eckstein noted, “that it is economical for all resources: money, manpower, time, effort… especially important, of course, if studies are inherently costly, as they are if units are complex collective individuals ” (1975: 149-150, emphasis added).

Limitations

Single case study analysis has, however, been subject to a number of criticisms, the most common of which concern the inter-related issues of methodological rigour, researcher subjectivity, and external validity. With regard to the first point, the prototypical view here is that of Zeev Maoz (2002: 164-165), who suggests that “the use of the case study absolves the author from any kind of methodological considerations. Case studies have become in many cases a synonym for freeform research where anything goes”. The absence of systematic procedures for case study research is something that Yin (2009: 14-15) sees as traditionally the greatest concern due to a relative absence of methodological guidelines. As the previous section suggests, this critique seems somewhat unfair; many contemporary case study practitioners – and representing various strands of IR theory – have increasingly sought to clarify and develop their methodological techniques and epistemological grounding (Bennett and Elman, 2010: 499-500).

A second issue, again also incorporating issues of construct validity, concerns that of the reliability and replicability of various forms of single case study analysis. This is usually tied to a broader critique of qualitative research methods as a whole. However, whereas the latter obviously tend toward an explicitly-acknowledged interpretive basis for meanings, reasons, and understandings:

“quantitative measures appear objective, but only so long as we don’t ask questions about where and how the data were produced… pure objectivity is not a meaningful concept if the goal is to measure intangibles [as] these concepts only exist because we can interpret them” (Berg and Lune, 2010: 340).

The question of researcher subjectivity is a valid one, and it may be intended only as a methodological critique of what are obviously less formalised and researcher-independent methods (Verschuren, 2003). Owen (1994) and Layne’s (1994) contradictory process tracing results of interdemocratic war-avoidance during the Anglo-American crisis of 1861 to 1863 – from liberal and realist standpoints respectively – are a useful example. However, it does also rest on certain assumptions that can raise deeper and potentially irreconcilable ontological and epistemological issues. There are, regardless, plenty such as Bent Flyvbjerg (2006: 237) who suggest that the case study contains no greater bias toward verification than other methods of inquiry, and that “on the contrary, experience indicates that the case study contains a greater bias toward falsification of preconceived notions than toward verification”.

The third and arguably most prominent critique of single case study analysis is the issue of external validity or generalisability. How is it that one case can reliably offer anything beyond the particular? “We always do better (or, in the extreme, no worse) with more observation as the basis of our generalization”, as King et al write; “in all social science research and all prediction, it is important that we be as explicit as possible about the degree of uncertainty that accompanies out prediction” (1994: 212). This is an unavoidably valid criticism. It may be that theories which pass a single crucial case study test, for example, require rare antecedent conditions and therefore actually have little explanatory range. These conditions may emerge more clearly, as Van Evera (1997: 51-54) notes, from large-N studies in which cases that lack them present themselves as outliers exhibiting a theory’s cause but without its predicted outcome. As with the case of Indian democratisation above, it would logically be preferable to conduct large-N analysis beforehand to identify that state’s non-representative nature in relation to the broader population.

There are, however, three important qualifiers to the argument about generalisation that deserve particular mention here. The first is that with regard to an idiographic single-outcome case study, as Eckstein notes, the criticism is “mitigated by the fact that its capability to do so [is] never claimed by its exponents; in fact it is often explicitly repudiated” (1975: 134). Criticism of generalisability is of little relevance when the intention is one of particularisation. A second qualifier relates to the difference between statistical and analytical generalisation; single case studies are clearly less appropriate for the former but arguably retain significant utility for the latter – the difference also between explanatory and exploratory, or theory-testing and theory-building, as discussed above. As Gerring puts it, “theory confirmation/disconfirmation is not the case study’s strong suit” (2004: 350). A third qualification relates to the issue of case selection. As Seawright and Gerring (2008) note, the generalisability of case studies can be increased by the strategic selection of cases. Representative or random samples may not be the most appropriate, given that they may not provide the richest insight (or indeed, that a random and unknown deviant case may appear). Instead, and properly used , atypical or extreme cases “often reveal more information because they activate more actors… and more basic mechanisms in the situation studied” (Flyvbjerg, 2006). Of course, this also points to the very serious limitation, as hinted at with the case of India above, that poor case selection may alternatively lead to overgeneralisation and/or grievous misunderstandings of the relationship between variables or processes (Bennett and Elman, 2006a: 460-463).

As Tim May (2011: 226) notes, “the goal for many proponents of case studies […] is to overcome dichotomies between generalizing and particularizing, quantitative and qualitative, deductive and inductive techniques”. Research aims should drive methodological choices, rather than narrow and dogmatic preconceived approaches. As demonstrated above, there are various advantages to both idiographic and nomothetic single case study analyses – notably the empirically-rich, context-specific, holistic accounts that they have to offer, and their contribution to theory-building and, to a lesser extent, that of theory-testing. Furthermore, while they do possess clear limitations, any research method involves necessary trade-offs; the inherent weaknesses of any one method, however, can potentially be offset by situating them within a broader, pluralistic mixed-method research strategy. Whether or not single case studies are used in this fashion, they clearly have a great deal to offer.

References

Bennett, A. and Checkel, J. T. (2012) ‘Process Tracing: From Philosophical Roots to Best Practice’, Simons Papers in Security and Development, No. 21/2012, School for International Studies, Simon Fraser University: Vancouver.

Bennett, A. and Elman, C. (2006a) ‘Qualitative Research: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods’, Annual Review of Political Science , 9, 455-476.

Bennett, A. and Elman, C. (2006b) ‘Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence’, Political Analysis , 14, 3, 250-267.

Bennett, A. and Elman, C. (2007) ‘Case Study Methods in the International Relations Subfield’, Comparative Political Studies , 40, 2, 170-195.

Bennett, A. and Elman, C. (2010) Case Study Methods. In C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal (eds) The Oxford Handbook of International Relations . Oxford University Press: Oxford. Ch. 29.

Berg, B. and Lune, H. (2012) Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences . Pearson: London.

Bryman, A. (2012) Social Research Methods . Oxford University Press: Oxford.

David, M. and Sutton, C. D. (2011) Social Research: An Introduction . SAGE Publications Ltd: London.

Diamond, J. (1992) ‘Economic development and democracy reconsidered’, American Behavioral Scientist , 35, 4/5, 450-499.

Eckstein, H. (1975) Case Study and Theory in Political Science. In R. Gomm, M. Hammersley, and P. Foster (eds) Case Study Method . SAGE Publications Ltd: London.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2006) ‘Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research’, Qualitative Inquiry , 12, 2, 219-245.

Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays by Clifford Geertz . Basic Books Inc: New York.

Gerring, J. (2004) ‘What is a Case Study and What Is It Good for?’, American Political Science Review , 98, 2, 341-354.

Gerring, J. (2006a) Case Study Research: Principles and Practices . Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Gerring, J. (2006b) ‘Single-Outcome Studies: A Methodological Primer’, International Sociology , 21, 5, 707-734.

Gerring, J. (2007) ‘Is There a (Viable) Crucial-Case Method?’, Comparative Political Studies , 40, 3, 231-253.

King, G., Keohane, R. O. and Verba, S. (1994) Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research . Princeton University Press: Chichester.

Layne, C. (1994) ‘Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace’, International Security , 19, 2, 5-49.

Levy, J. S. (2008) ‘Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference’, Conflict Management and Peace Science , 25, 1-18.

Lipset, S. M. (1959) ‘Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy’, The American Political Science Review , 53, 1, 69-105.

Lyotard, J-F. (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge . University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis.

MacMillan, A. (2008) ‘Deviant Democratization in India’, Democratization , 15, 4, 733-749.

Maoz, Z. (2002) Case study methodology in international studies: from storytelling to hypothesis testing. In F. P. Harvey and M. Brecher (eds) Evaluating Methodology in International Studies . University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor.

May, T. (2011) Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process . Open University Press: Maidenhead.

Owen, J. M. (1994) ‘How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace’, International Security , 19, 2, 87-125.

Seawright, J. and Gerring, J. (2008) ‘Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options’, Political Research Quarterly , 61, 2, 294-308.

Stake, R. E. (2008) Qualitative Case Studies. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds) Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry . Sage Publications: Los Angeles. Ch. 17.

Van Evera, S. (1997) Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science . Cornell University Press: Ithaca.

Verschuren, P. J. M. (2003) ‘Case study as a research strategy: some ambiguities and opportunities’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology , 6, 2, 121-139.

Yin, R. K. (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods . SAGE Publications Ltd: London.

[1] The paper follows convention by differentiating between ‘International Relations’ as the academic discipline and ‘international relations’ as the subject of study.

[2] There is some similarity here with Stake’s (2008: 445-447) notion of intrinsic cases, those undertaken for a better understanding of the particular case, and instrumental ones that provide insight for the purposes of a wider external interest.

[3] These may be unique in the idiographic sense, or in nomothetic terms as an exception to the generalising suppositions of either probabilistic or deterministic theories (as per deviant cases, below).

[4] Although there are “philosophical hurdles to mount”, according to Bennett and Checkel, there exists no a priori reason as to why process tracing (as typically grounded in scientific realism) is fundamentally incompatible with various strands of positivism or interpretivism (2012: 18-19). By extension, it can therefore be incorporated by a range of contemporary mainstream IR theories.

— Written by: Ben Willis Written at: University of Plymouth Written for: David Brockington Date written: January 2013

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

Create a new collection
Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.

Search in PubMed
Search in NLM Catalog
Add to Search

Single-Case Research Methods: History and Suitability for a Psychological Science in Need of Alternatives

Affiliation.

1 Faculty of Psychology, Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, Carrera 9A No. 62-27 - Third Floor - Edificio Luna, Bogota, Colombia, [email protected].
PMID: 25876996
DOI: 10.1007/s12124-014-9290-2

This paper presents a historical and conceptual analysis of a group of research strategies known as the Single-Case Methods (SCMs). First, we present an overview of the SCMs, their history, and their major proponents. We will argue that the philosophical roots of SCMs can be found in the ideas of authors who recognized the importance of understanding both the generality and individuality of psychological functioning. Second, we will discuss the influence that the natural sciences' attitude toward measurement and experimentation has had on SCMs. Although this influence can be traced back to the early days of experimental psychology, during which incipient forms of SCMs appeared, SCMs reached full development during the subsequent advent of Behavior Analysis (BA). Third, we will show that despite the success of SCMs in BA and other (mainly applied) disciplines, these designs are currently not prominent in psychology. More importantly, they have been neglected as a possible alternative to one of the mainstream approaches in psychology, the Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST), despite serious controversies about the limitations of this prevailing method. Our thesis throughout this section will be that SCMs should be considered as an alternative to NHST because many of the recommendations for improving the use of significance testing (Wilkinson & the TFSI, 1999) are main characteristics of SCMs. The paper finishes with a discussion of a number of the possible reasons why SCMs have been neglected.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Search in MeSH

LinkOut - more resources

Full text sources.

Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

Medical Books

Sorry, there was a problem.

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required .

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

Image Unavailable

Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings

To view this video download Flash Player

Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings 2nd Edition

ISBN-10 0195341880
ISBN-13 978-0195341881
Edition 2nd
Publisher Oxford University Press
Publication date February 9, 2010
Language English
Dimensions 7.5 x 0.5 x 9 inches
Print length 464 pages
See all details

Editorial Reviews

Book description, about the author, product details.

Publisher ‏ : ‎ Oxford University Press; 2nd edition (February 9, 2010)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
Paperback ‏ : ‎ 464 pages
ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0195341880
ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0195341881
Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1.25 pounds
Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 7.5 x 0.5 x 9 inches
#219 in Medical Research (Books)
#253 in Medical Mental Illness
#900 in Medical Clinical Psychology

Customer reviews

5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 5 star 76% 15% 4% 1% 5% 76%
5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 4 star 76% 15% 4% 1% 5% 15%
5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 3 star 76% 15% 4% 1% 5% 4%
5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 2 star 76% 15% 4% 1% 5% 1%
5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 1 star 76% 15% 4% 1% 5% 5%

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.

Customers say

Customers find the content very informative and understandable. They also describe the writing style as excellent and not bogged down with technical jargon.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

Customers find the book's content straight-forward, informative, and great for graduate programs. They also say it's one of the best books on single case designs and written in an understandable language.

"...He does a great job of explaining the historical context of SSRD, strengths and weaknesses, variations, theoretical underpinnings, and comparisons..." Read more

"...not bogged down with technical jargon, straight-forward, and yet very informative ...." Read more

"One of the best books on Single case designs , a very understandable language!" Read more

"...It is a very dry text, though very informative on the essential components of single-case research. It was shipped very quickly through amazon...." Read more

Customers find the writing style excellent, gifted, and easy to understand. They also say the concepts are incredibly easy to comprehend.

"This is an excellent text. Kazdin is a gifted writer and makes the concepts incredibly easy to understand...." Read more

"...His writing style is that of a wonderful teacher - not bogged down with technical jargon , straight-forward, and yet very informative...." Read more

"One of the best books on Single case designs, a very understandable language !" Read more

"This was essential reading for my graduate school course. It is a very dry text , though very informative on the essential components of single-case..." Read more

Reviews with images

Used means damaged I guess

Sort reviews by Top reviews Most recent Top reviews

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. please try again later..

About Amazon
Investor Relations
Amazon Devices
Amazon Science
Sell products on Amazon
Sell on Amazon Business
Sell apps on Amazon
Become an Affiliate
Advertise Your Products
Self-Publish with Us
Host an Amazon Hub
› See More Make Money with Us
Amazon Business Card
Shop with Points
Reload Your Balance
Amazon Currency Converter
Amazon and COVID-19
Your Account
Your Orders
Shipping Rates & Policies
Returns & Replacements
Manage Your Content and Devices

Conditions of Use
Privacy Notice
Consumer Health Data Privacy Disclosure
Your Ads Privacy Choices

Information

Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

Active Journals
Find a Journal
Proceedings Series
For Authors
For Reviewers
For Editors
For Librarians
For Publishers
For Societies
For Conference Organizers
Open Access Policy
Institutional Open Access Program
Special Issues Guidelines
Editorial Process
Research and Publication Ethics
Article Processing Charges
Testimonials
Preprints.org
SciProfiles
Encyclopedia

Article Menu

Subscribe SciFeed
Recommended Articles
Google Scholar
on Google Scholar
Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Research on intelligent ventilation system of metal mine based on real-time sensing airflow parameters with a global scheme.

1. Introduction

2.1. project overview, 2.2. artificial neural network prediction model, 2.3. convolutional neural networks (cnns), 2.4. support vector machine (svm), 2.5. the establishment of an airflow parameter training database, 3. model validation, 3.1. intelligent prediction database, 3.2. comparison of prediction methods of different airflow parameters, 4. intelligent prediction system of mine ventilation, 5. conclusions, author contributions, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

Brkić, D.; Praks, P. Short Overview of Early Developments of the Hardy Cross Type Methods for Computation of Flow Distribution in Pipe Networks. Appl. Sci. 2019 , 9 , 2019. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Xu, Y.; Li, Z.; Wang, J.; Chen, Y.; Li, R.; Wang, Q.; Jia, M. Ventilation and Heat Exchange Characteristics in High Geotemperature Tunnels Considering Buoyancy-Driven Flow and Groundwater Flow. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2022 , 173 , 107400. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Zhang, H.; Han, W.; Xu, Y.; Wang, Z. Analysis on the Development Status of Coal Mine Dust Disaster Prevention Technology in China. J. Healthc. Eng. 2021 , 2021 , 5574579. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Zheng, C.; Jiang, B.; Xue, S.; Chen, Z.; Li, H. Coalbed Methane Emissions and Drainage Methods in Underground Mining for Mining Safety and Environmental Benefits: A Review. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2019 , 127 , 103–124. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Penner, K.B. Ventilation Design Strategy to Meet Future Production Requirements for a Saskatchewan Potash Mine. Master’s Thesis, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada, 2015. [ Google Scholar ]
Cai, M.; Li, P.; Tan, W.; Ren, F. Key Engineering Technologies to Achieve Green, Intelligent, and Sustainable Development of Deep Metal Mines in China. Engineering 2021 , 7 , 1513–1517. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
De Souza, E. Application of Ventilation Management Programs for Improved Mine Safety. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2017 , 27 , 647–650. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Gao, K.; Qi, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J. Calculation Model for Ventilation Friction Resistance Coefficient by Surrounding Rock Roughness Distribution Characteristics of Mine Tunnel. Sci. Rep. 2022 , 12 , 3193. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
Chikande, T.; Phillips, H.R.; Cawood, F.T. Ventilation Optimization through Digital Transformation. J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 2023 , 122 , 687–696. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Yu, B.; Shao, L. An Optimization Method of Mine Ventilation System Based on R2 Index Hybrid Multi-Objective Equilibrium Optimization Algorithm. Energy Rep. 2022 , 8 , 11003–11021. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Hao, H.; Jiang, S.; Wu, Z.; Wang, K.; Xi, X. Experimental Study on Precise Control Air Quantity on Demand by the Cooperation of Multiple Main Fans in Mine. J. Clean. Prod. 2023 , 414 , 137626. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Kozyrev, S.A.; Osintseva, A.V. Optimizing Arrangement of Air Distribution Controllers in Mine Ventilation System. J. Min. Sci. 2012 , 48 , 896–903. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Cheng, J.; Ma, Y.; Lu, W.; Liu, G.; Cai, F. Using Inverting CO Critical Value to Predict Coal Spontaneous Combustion Severity in Mine Gobs with Considering Air Leakages—A Case Study. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2022 , 167 , 45–55. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Huang, D.; Liu, J.; Deng, L.; Li, X.; Song, Y. An Adaptive Kalman Filter for Online Monitoring of Mine Wind Speed. Arch. Min. Sci. 2019 , 813–827. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Zhou, L.; Yuan, L.; Thomas, R.; Iannacchione, A. Determination of Velocity Correction Factors for Real-Time Air Velocity Monitoring in Underground Mines. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 2017 , 4 , 322–332. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
Yan, Z.; Wang, Y.; Fan, J.; Huang, Y.; Zhong, Y. An Efficient Method for Optimizing Sensors’ Layout for Accurate Measurement of Underground Ventilation Networks. IEEE Access 2023 , 11 , 72630–72640. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Suvar, M.C.; Lupu, C.; Arad, V.; Cioclea, D.; Pasculescu, V.M.; Mija, N. Computerized simulation of mine ventilation networks for sustainable decision making process. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2014 , 13 , 1445–1451. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Huang, D.; Liu, J.; Deng, L. A Hybrid-Encoding Adaptive Evolutionary Strategy Algorithm for Windage Alteration Fault Diagnosis. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2020 , 136 , 242–252. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Wang, D.; Liu, J.; Lijun, D.; Honglin, W. A Supervised Diagnostic Experiment of Resistance Variable Multifault Locations in a Mine Ventilation System. Sci. Rep. 2023 , 13 , 5259. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Jia, P.; Jia, J.; Song, L.; Li, Z.; Li, B. Theory of RPOD Adjustment of Air Volume for Mine Intelligent Ventilation. Int. J. Vent. 2022 , 21 , 316–329. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Wang, Y.; Pan, Q.; Gao, L.; Cao, Y.; Liu, P.; Yi, H.; Gao, C. Analysis of Distribution Method of Designed Air Quantity in Coal Mine Ventilation—A Case Study. Sci. Rep. 2024 , 14 , 10917. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Wang, K.; Jiang, S.; Wu, Z.; Shao, H.; Zhang, W.; Pei, X.; Cui, C. Intelligent Safety Adjustment of Branch Airflow Volume during Ventilation-on-Demand Changes in Coal Mines. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2017 , 111 , 491–506. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Qu, F.; Shao, A.; Zhao, L.; Wang, H.; Yue, X.; Li, Y.; Yan, W.; et al. Research progress and prospects of intelligent technology in underground mining of hard rock mines. Green Smart Min. Eng. 2024 , 1 , 12–26. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Gao, K.; Huang, Y.; Zhu, C. Efficient Graphical Algorithm of Sensor Distribution and Air Volume Reconstruction for a Smart Mine Ventilation Network. Sensors 2022 , 22 , 2096. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
Liu, L.; Liu, J.; Zhou, Q.; Huang, D. Machine Learning Algorithm Selection for Windage Alteration Fault Diagnosis of Mine Ventilation System. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2022 , 53 , 101666. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Wang, J.; Jia, M.; Bin, L.; Wang, L.; Zhong, D. Regulation and Optimization of Air Quantity in a Mine Ventilation Network with Multiple Fans. Arch. Min. Sci. 2023 , 179–193. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Zhang, W.; Li, Y.; Li, J. Data Processing Method of Mine Wind Speed Monitoring Based on an Improved Fuzzy C-Means Clustering Algorithm. Appl. Sci. 2022 , 12 , 9701. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Saxén, H.; Pettersson, F. Method for the Selection of Inputs and Structure of Feedforward Neural Networks. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2006 , 30 , 1038–1045. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Zhang, Y.; Lin, H.; Yang, X.; Long, W. Combining Expert Weights for Online Portfolio Selection Based on the Gradient Descent Algorithm. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2021 , 234 , 107533. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Liu, L.; Liu, J.; Zhou, Q.; Huang, D. Influence of sample attributes on generalization performance of machine learning models for windage alteration fault diagnosis of the mine ventilation system. Expert Syst. Appl. 2023 , 213 , 119320. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Li, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, B.; Zhang, Z.; Dong, J.; Cui, Y. Accurate and real-time network calculation for mine ventilation without wind resistance measurement. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2022 , 230 , 105183. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Tang, W.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, H.; Huang, W. An intelligent airflow perception model for metal mines based on CNN-LSTM architecture. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2024 , 187 , 1234–1247. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

	RMSE	MAE	MAPE
ANN	0.0965	0.00998	29.576
SVR	0.0892	0.01065	30.452
CNN	0.0985	0.00971	26.531

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

Chen, Y.; Li, Z.; Liu, X.; Tang, W.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, H.; Huang, W. Research on Intelligent Ventilation System of Metal Mine Based on Real-Time Sensing Airflow Parameters with a Global Scheme. Appl. Sci. 2024 , 14 , 7602. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177602

Chen Y, Li Z, Liu X, Tang W, Zhang Q, Wang H, Huang W. Research on Intelligent Ventilation System of Metal Mine Based on Real-Time Sensing Airflow Parameters with a Global Scheme. Applied Sciences . 2024; 14(17):7602. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177602

Chen, Yin, Zijun Li, Xin Liu, Wenxuan Tang, Qilong Zhang, Haining Wang, and Wei Huang. 2024. "Research on Intelligent Ventilation System of Metal Mine Based on Real-Time Sensing Airflow Parameters with a Global Scheme" Applied Sciences 14, no. 17: 7602. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177602

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Publications
Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

Advanced Search
Journal List
Sage Choice
PMC11334375

Methodologic and Data-Analysis Triangulation in Case Studies: A Scoping Review

Margarithe charlotte schlunegger.

1 Department of Health Professions, Applied Research & Development in Nursing, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland

2 Faculty of Health, School of Nursing Science, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany

Maya Zumstein-Shaha

Rebecca palm.

3 Department of Health Care Research, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany

Associated Data

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-wjn-10.1177_01939459241263011 for Methodologic and Data-Analysis Triangulation in Case Studies: A Scoping Review by Margarithe Charlotte Schlunegger, Maya Zumstein-Shaha and Rebecca Palm in Western Journal of Nursing Research

We sought to explore the processes of methodologic and data-analysis triangulation in case studies using the example of research on nurse practitioners in primary health care.

Design and methods:

We conducted a scoping review within Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework, considering studies that defined a case study design and used 2 or more data sources, published in English or German before August 2023.

Data sources:

The databases searched were MEDLINE and CINAHL, supplemented with hand searching of relevant nursing journals. We also examined the reference list of all the included studies.

In total, 63 reports were assessed for eligibility. Ultimately, we included 8 articles. Five studies described within-method triangulation, whereas 3 provided information on between/across-method triangulation. No study reported within-method triangulation of 2 or more quantitative data-collection procedures. The data-collection procedures were interviews, observation, documentation/documents, service records, and questionnaires/assessments. The data-analysis triangulation involved various qualitative and quantitative methods of analysis. Details about comparing or contrasting results from different qualitative and mixed-methods data were lacking.

Conclusions:

Various processes for methodologic and data-analysis triangulation are described in this scoping review but lack detail, thus hampering standardization in case study research, potentially affecting research traceability. Triangulation is complicated by terminological confusion. To advance case study research in nursing, authors should reflect critically on the processes of triangulation and employ existing tools, like a protocol or mixed-methods matrix, for transparent reporting. The only existing reporting guideline should be complemented with directions on methodologic and data-analysis triangulation.

Case study research is defined as “an empirical method that investigates a contemporary phenomenon (the ‘case’) in depth and within its real-world context, especially when the boundaries between phenomenon and context may not be clearly evident. A case study relies on multiple sources of evidence, with data needing to converge in a triangulating fashion.” 1 (p15) This design is described as a stand-alone research approach equivalent to grounded theory and can entail single and multiple cases. 1 , 2 However, case study research should not be confused with single clinical case reports. “Case reports are familiar ways of sharing events of intervening with single patients with previously unreported features.” 3 (p107) As a methodology, case study research encompasses substantially more complexity than a typical clinical case report. 1 , 3

A particular characteristic of case study research is the use of various data sources, such as quantitative data originating from questionnaires as well as qualitative data emerging from interviews, observations, or documents. Therefore, a case study always draws on multiple sources of evidence, and the data must converge in a triangulating manner. 1 When using multiple data sources, a case or cases can be examined more convincingly and accurately, compensating for the weaknesses of the respective data sources. 1 Another characteristic is the interaction of various perspectives. This involves comparing or contrasting perspectives of people with different points of view, eg, patients, staff, or leaders. 4 Through triangulation, case studies contribute to the completeness of the research on complex topics, such as role implementation in clinical practice. 1 , 5 Triangulation involves a combination of researchers from various disciplines, of theories, of methods, and/or of data sources. By creating connections between these sources (ie, investigator, theories, methods, data sources, and/or data analysis), a new understanding of the phenomenon under study can be obtained. 6 , 7

This scoping review focuses on methodologic and data-analysis triangulation because concrete procedures are missing, eg, in reporting guidelines. Methodologic triangulation has been called methods, mixed methods, or multimethods. 6 It can encompass within-method triangulation and between/across-method triangulation. 7 “Researchers using within-method triangulation use at least 2 data-collection procedures from the same design approach.” 6 (p254) Within-method triangulation is either qualitative or quantitative but not both. Therefore, within-method triangulation can also be considered data source triangulation. 8 In contrast, “researchers using between/across-method triangulation employ both qualitative and quantitative data-collection methods in the same study.” 6 (p254) Hence, methodologic approaches are combined as well as various data sources. For this scoping review, the term “methodologic triangulation” is maintained to denote between/across-method triangulation. “Data-analysis triangulation is the combination of 2 or more methods of analyzing data.” 6 (p254)

Although much has been published on case studies, there is little consensus on the quality of the various data sources, the most appropriate methods, or the procedures for conducting methodologic and data-analysis triangulation. 5 According to the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) clearinghouse for reporting guidelines, one standard exists for organizational case studies. 9 Organizational case studies provide insights into organizational change in health care services. 9 Rodgers et al 9 pointed out that, although high-quality studies are being funded and published, they are sometimes poorly articulated and methodologically inadequate. In the reporting checklist by Rodgers et al, 9 a description of the data collection is included, but reporting directions on methodologic and data-analysis triangulation are missing. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the process of methodologic and data-analysis triangulation in case studies. Accordingly, we conducted a scoping review to elicit descriptions of and directions for triangulation methods and analysis, drawing on case studies of nurse practitioners (NPs) in primary health care as an example. Case studies are recommended to evaluate the implementation of new roles in (primary) health care, such as that of NPs. 1 , 5 Case studies on new role implementation can generate a unique and in-depth understanding of specific roles (individual), teams (smaller groups), family practices or similar institutions (organization), and social and political processes in health care systems. 1 , 10 The integration of NPs into health care systems is at different stages of progress around the world. 11 Therefore, studies are needed to evaluate this process.

The methodological framework by Arksey and O’Malley 12 guided this scoping review. We examined the current scientific literature on the use of methodologic and data-analysis triangulation in case studies on NPs in primary health care. The review process included the following stages: (1) establishing the research question; (2) identifying relevant studies; (3) selecting the studies for inclusion; (4) charting the data; (5) collating, summarizing, and reporting the results; and (6) consulting experts in the field. 12 Stage 6 was not performed due to a lack of financial resources. The reporting of the review followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Review) guideline by Tricco et al 13 (guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses [ Supplementary Table A ]). Scoping reviews are not eligible for registration in PROSPERO.

Stage 1: Establishing the Research Question

The aim of this scoping review was to examine the process of triangulating methods and analysis in case studies on NPs in primary health care to improve the reporting. We sought to answer the following question: How have methodologic and data-analysis triangulation been conducted in case studies on NPs in primary health care? To answer the research question, we examined the following elements of the selected studies: the research question, the study design, the case definition, the selected data sources, and the methodologic and data-analysis triangulation.

Stage 2: Identifying Relevant Studies

A systematic database search was performed in the MEDLINE (via PubMed) and CINAHL (via EBSCO) databases between July and September 2020 to identify relevant articles. The following terms were used as keyword search strategies: (“Advanced Practice Nursing” OR “nurse practitioners”) AND (“primary health care” OR “Primary Care Nursing”) AND (“case study” OR “case studies”). Searches were limited to English- and German-language articles. Hand searches were conducted in the journals Nursing Inquiry , BMJ Open , and BioMed Central ( BMC ). We also screened the reference lists of the studies included. The database search was updated in August 2023. The complete search strategy for all the databases is presented in Supplementary Table B .

Stage 3: Selecting the Studies

Inclusion and exclusion criteria.

We used the inclusion and exclusion criteria reported in Table 1 . We included studies of NPs who had at least a master’s degree in nursing according to the definition of the International Council of Nurses. 14 This scoping review considered studies that were conducted in primary health care practices in rural, urban, and suburban regions. We excluded reviews and study protocols in which no data collection had occurred. Articles were included without limitations on the time period or country of origin.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria.

Criteria	Inclusion	Exclusion
Population	- NPs with a master’s degree in nursing or higher	- Nurses with a bachelor’s degree in nursing or lower - Pre-registration nursing students - No definition of master’s degree in nursing described in the publication
Interest	- Description/definition of a case study design - Two or more data sources	- Reviews - Study protocols - Summaries/comments/discussions
Context	- Primary health care - Family practices and home visits (including adult practices, internal medicine practices, community health centers)	- Nursing homes, hospital, hospice

Screening process

After the search, we collated and uploaded all the identified records into EndNote v.X8 (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and removed any duplicates. Two independent reviewers (MCS and SA) screened the titles and abstracts for assessment in line with the inclusion criteria. They retrieved and assessed the full texts of the selected studies while applying the inclusion criteria. Any disagreements about the eligibility of studies were resolved by discussion or, if no consensus could be reached, by involving experienced researchers (MZ-S and RP).

Stages 4 and 5: Charting the Data and Collating, Summarizing, and Reporting the Results

The first reviewer (MCS) extracted data from the selected publications. For this purpose, an extraction tool developed by the authors was used. This tool comprised the following criteria: author(s), year of publication, country, research question, design, case definition, data sources, and methodologic and data-analysis triangulation. First, we extracted and summarized information about the case study design. Second, we narratively summarized the way in which the data and methodological triangulation were described. Finally, we summarized the information on within-case or cross-case analysis. This process was performed using Microsoft Excel. One reviewer (MCS) extracted data, whereas another reviewer (SA) cross-checked the data extraction, making suggestions for additions or edits. Any disagreements between the reviewers were resolved through discussion.

A total of 149 records were identified in 2 databases. We removed 20 duplicates and screened 129 reports by title and abstract. A total of 46 reports were assessed for eligibility. Through hand searches, we identified 117 additional records. Of these, we excluded 98 reports after title and abstract screening. A total of 17 reports were assessed for eligibility. From the 2 databases and the hand search, 63 reports were assessed for eligibility. Ultimately, we included 8 articles for data extraction. No further articles were included after the reference list screening of the included studies. A PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection and inclusion process is presented in Figure 1 . As shown in Tables 2 and and3, 3 , the articles included in this scoping review were published between 2010 and 2022 in Canada (n = 3), the United States (n = 2), Australia (n = 2), and Scotland (n = 1).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 10.1177_01939459241263011-fig1.jpg

PRISMA flow diagram.

Characteristics of Articles Included.

Author	Contandriopoulos et al	Flinter	Hogan et al	Hungerford et al	O’Rourke	Roots and MacDonald	Schadewaldt et al	Strachan et al
Country	Canada	The United States	The United States	Australia	Canada	Canada	Australia	Scotland
How or why research question	No information on the research question	Several how or why research questions	What and how research question	No information on the research question	Several how or why research questions	No information on the research question	What research question	What and why research questions
Design and referenced author of methodological guidance	Six qualitative case studies Robert K. Yin	Multiple-case studies design Robert K. Yin	Multiple-case studies design Robert E. Stake	Case study design Robert K. Yin	Qualitative single-case study Robert K. Yin Robert E. Stake Sharan Merriam	Single-case study design Robert K. Yin Sharan Merriam	Multiple-case studies design Robert K. Yin Robert E. Stake	Multiple-case studies design
Case definition	Team of health professionals (Small group)	Nurse practitioners (Individuals)	Primary care practices (Organization)	Community-based NP model of practice (Organization)	NP-led practice (Organization)	Primary care practices (Organization)	No information on case definition	Health board (Organization)

Overview of Within-Method, Between/Across-Method, and Data-Analysis Triangulation.

Author	Contandriopoulos et al	Flinter	Hogan et al	Hungerford et al	O’Rourke	Roots and MacDonald	Schadewaldt et al	Strachan et al
Within-method triangulation (using within-method triangulation use at least 2 data-collection procedures from the same design approach)
:
Interviews	X		x	x	x			x
Observations			x	x
Public documents	x				x			x
Electronic health records			x
Between/across-method (using both qualitative and quantitative data-collection procedures in the same study)
:
:
Interviews		x				x	x
Observations						x	x
Public documents						x	x
Electronic health records		x
:
Self-assessment		x
Service records						x
Questionnaires							x
Data-analysis triangulation (combination of 2 or more methods of analyzing data)
:
:
Deductive		x				x	x
Inductive						x	x
Thematic						x	x
Content
:
Descriptive analysis		x				x	x
:
:
Deductive	x			x	x			x
Inductive					x			x
Thematic								x
Content					x

Research Question, Case Definition, and Case Study Design

The following sections describe the research question, case definition, and case study design. Case studies are most appropriate when asking “how” or “why” questions. 1 According to Yin, 1 how and why questions are explanatory and lead to the use of case studies, histories, and experiments as the preferred research methods. In 1 study from Canada, eg, the following research question was presented: “How and why did stakeholders participate in the system change process that led to the introduction of the first nurse practitioner-led Clinic in Ontario?” (p7) 19 Once the research question has been formulated, the case should be defined and, subsequently, the case study design chosen. 1 In typical case studies with mixed methods, the 2 types of data are gathered concurrently in a convergent design and the results merged to examine a case and/or compare multiple cases. 10

Research question

“How” or “why” questions were found in 4 studies. 16 , 17 , 19 , 22 Two studies additionally asked “what” questions. Three studies described an exploratory approach, and 1 study presented an explanatory approach. Of these 4 studies, 3 studies chose a qualitative approach 17 , 19 , 22 and 1 opted for mixed methods with a convergent design. 16

In the remaining studies, either the research questions were not clearly stated or no “how” or “why” questions were formulated. For example, “what” questions were found in 1 study. 21 No information was provided on exploratory, descriptive, and explanatory approaches. Schadewaldt et al 21 chose mixed methods with a convergent design.

Case definition and case study design

A total of 5 studies defined the case as an organizational unit. 17 , 18 - 20 , 22 Of the 8 articles, 4 reported multiple-case studies. 16 , 17 , 22 , 23 Another 2 publications involved single-case studies. 19 , 20 Moreover, 2 publications did not state the case study design explicitly.

Within-Method Triangulation

This section describes within-method triangulation, which involves employing at least 2 data-collection procedures within the same design approach. 6 , 7 This can also be called data source triangulation. 8 Next, we present the single data-collection procedures in detail. In 5 studies, information on within-method triangulation was found. 15 , 17 - 19 , 22 Studies describing a quantitative approach and the triangulation of 2 or more quantitative data-collection procedures could not be included in this scoping review.

Qualitative approach

Five studies used qualitative data-collection procedures. Two studies combined face-to-face interviews and documents. 15 , 19 One study mixed in-depth interviews with observations, 18 and 1 study combined face-to-face interviews and documentation. 22 One study contained face-to-face interviews, observations, and documentation. 17 The combination of different qualitative data-collection procedures was used to present the case context in an authentic and complex way, to elicit the perspectives of the participants, and to obtain a holistic description and explanation of the cases under study.

All 5 studies used qualitative interviews as the primary data-collection procedure. 15 , 17 - 19 , 22 Face-to-face, in-depth, and semi-structured interviews were conducted. The topics covered in the interviews included processes in the introduction of new care services and experiences of barriers and facilitators to collaborative work in general practices. Two studies did not specify the type of interviews conducted and did not report sample questions. 15 , 18

Observations

In 2 studies, qualitative observations were carried out. 17 , 18 During the observations, the physical design of the clinical patients’ rooms and office spaces was examined. 17 Hungerford et al 18 did not explain what information was collected during the observations. In both studies, the type of observation was not specified. Observations were generally recorded as field notes.

Public documents

In 3 studies, various qualitative public documents were studied. 15 , 19 , 22 These documents included role description, education curriculum, governance frameworks, websites, and newspapers with information about the implementation of the role and general practice. Only 1 study failed to specify the type of document and the collected data. 15

Electronic health records

In 1 study, qualitative documentation was investigated. 17 This included a review of dashboards (eg, provider productivity reports or provider quality dashboards in the electronic health record) and quality performance reports (eg, practice-wide or co-management team-wide performance reports).

Between/Across-Method Triangulation

This section describes the between/across methods, which involve employing both qualitative and quantitative data-collection procedures in the same study. 6 , 7 This procedure can also be denoted “methodologic triangulation.” 8 Subsequently, we present the individual data-collection procedures. In 3 studies, information on between/across triangulation was found. 16 , 20 , 21

Mixed methods

Three studies used qualitative and quantitative data-collection procedures. One study combined face-to-face interviews, documentation, and self-assessments. 16 One study employed semi-structured interviews, direct observation, documents, and service records, 20 and another study combined face-to-face interviews, non-participant observation, documents, and questionnaires. 23

All 3 studies used qualitative interviews as the primary data-collection procedure. 16 , 20 , 23 Face-to-face and semi-structured interviews were conducted. In the interviews, data were collected on the introduction of new care services and experiences of barriers to and facilitators of collaborative work in general practices.

Observation

In 2 studies, direct and non-participant qualitative observations were conducted. 20 , 23 During the observations, the interaction between health professionals or the organization and the clinical context was observed. Observations were generally recorded as field notes.

In 2 studies, various qualitative public documents were examined. 20 , 23 These documents included role description, newspapers, websites, and practice documents (eg, flyers). In the documents, information on the role implementation and role description of NPs was collected.

Individual journals

In 1 study, qualitative individual journals were studied. 16 These included reflective journals from NPs, who performed the role in primary health care.

Service records

Only 1 study involved quantitative service records. 20 These service records were obtained from the primary care practices and the respective health authorities. They were collected before and after the implementation of an NP role to identify changes in patients’ access to health care, the volume of patients served, and patients’ use of acute care services.

Questionnaires/Assessment

In 2 studies, quantitative questionnaires were used to gather information about the teams’ satisfaction with collaboration. 16 , 21 In 1 study, 3 validated scales were used. The scales measured experience, satisfaction, and belief in the benefits of collaboration. 21 Psychometric performance indicators of these scales were provided. However, the time points of data collection were not specified; similarly, whether the questionnaires were completed online or by hand was not mentioned. A competency self-assessment tool was used in another study. 16 The assessment comprised 70 items and included topics such as health promotion, protection, disease prevention and treatment, the NP-patient relationship, the teaching-coaching function, the professional role, managing and negotiating health care delivery systems, monitoring and ensuring the quality of health care practice, and cultural competence. Psychometric performance indicators were provided. The assessment was completed online with 2 measurement time points (pre self-assessment and post self-assessment).

Data-Analysis Triangulation

This section describes data-analysis triangulation, which involves the combination of 2 or more methods of analyzing data. 6 Subsequently, we present within-case analysis and cross-case analysis.

Mixed-methods analysis

Three studies combined qualitative and quantitative methods of analysis. 16 , 20 , 21 Two studies involved deductive and inductive qualitative analysis, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically. 20 , 21 One used deductive qualitative analysis. 16 The method of analysis was not specified in the studies. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics in 3 studies. 16 , 20 , 23 The descriptive statistics comprised the calculation of the mean, median, and frequencies.

Qualitative methods of analysis

Two studies combined deductive and inductive qualitative analysis, 19 , 22 and 2 studies only used deductive qualitative analysis. 15 , 18 Qualitative data were analyzed thematically in 1 study, 22 and data were treated with content analysis in the other. 19 The method of analysis was not specified in the 2 studies.

Within-case analysis

In 7 studies, a within-case analysis was performed. 15 - 20 , 22 Six studies used qualitative data for the within-case analysis, and 1 study employed qualitative and quantitative data. Data were analyzed separately, consecutively, or in parallel. The themes generated from qualitative data were compared and then summarized. The individual cases were presented mostly as a narrative description. Quantitative data were integrated into the qualitative description with tables and graphs. Qualitative and quantitative data were also presented as a narrative description.

Cross-case analyses

Of the multiple-case studies, 5 carried out cross-case analyses. 15 - 17 , 20 , 22 Three studies described the cross-case analysis using qualitative data. Two studies reported a combination of qualitative and quantitative data for the cross-case analysis. In each multiple-case study, the individual cases were contrasted to identify the differences and similarities between the cases. One study did not specify whether a within-case or a cross-case analysis was conducted. 23

Confirmation or contradiction of data

This section describes confirmation or contradiction through qualitative and quantitative data. 1 , 4 Qualitative and quantitative data were reported separately, with little connection between them. As a result, the conclusions on neither the comparisons nor the contradictions could be clearly determined.

Confirmation or contradiction among qualitative data

In 3 studies, the consistency of the results of different types of qualitative data was highlighted. 16 , 19 , 21 In particular, documentation and interviews or interviews and observations were contrasted:

Confirmation between interviews and documentation: The data from these sources corroborated the existence of a common vision for an NP-led clinic. 19
Confirmation among interviews and observation: NPs experienced pressure to find and maintain their position within the existing system. Nurse practitioners and general practitioners performed complete episodes of care, each without collaborative interaction. 21
Contradiction among interviews and documentation: For example, interviewees mentioned that differentiating the scope of practice between NPs and physicians is difficult as there are too many areas of overlap. However, a clear description of the scope of practice for the 2 roles was provided. 21

Confirmation through a combination of qualitative and quantitative data

Both types of data showed that NPs and general practitioners wanted to have more time in common to discuss patient cases and engage in personal exchanges. 21 In addition, the qualitative and quantitative data confirmed the individual progression of NPs from less competent to more competent. 16 One study pointed out that qualitative and quantitative data obtained similar results for the cases. 20 For example, integrating NPs improved patient access by increasing appointment availability.

Contradiction through a combination of qualitative and quantitative data

Although questionnaire results indicated that NPs and general practitioners experienced high levels of collaboration and satisfaction with the collaborative relationship, the qualitative results drew a more ambivalent picture of NPs’ and general practitioners’ experiences with collaboration. 21

Research Question and Design

The studies included in this scoping review evidenced various research questions. The recommended formats (ie, how or why questions) were not applied consistently. Therefore, no case study design should be applied because the research question is the major guide for determining the research design. 2 Furthermore, case definitions and designs were applied variably. The lack of standardization is reflected in differences in the reporting of these case studies. Generally, case study research is viewed as allowing much more freedom and flexibility. 5 , 24 However, this flexibility and the lack of uniform specifications lead to confusion.

Methodologic Triangulation

Methodologic triangulation, as described in the literature, can be somewhat confusing as it can refer to either data-collection methods or research designs. 6 , 8 For example, methodologic triangulation can allude to qualitative and quantitative methods, indicating a paradigmatic connection. Methodologic triangulation can also point to qualitative and quantitative data-collection methods, analysis, and interpretation without specific philosophical stances. 6 , 8 Regarding “data-collection methods with no philosophical stances,” we would recommend using the wording “data source triangulation” instead. Thus, the demarcation between the method and the data-collection procedures will be clearer.

Within-Method and Between/Across-Method Triangulation

Yin 1 advocated the use of multiple sources of evidence so that a case or cases can be investigated more comprehensively and accurately. Most studies included multiple data-collection procedures. Five studies employed a variety of qualitative data-collection procedures, and 3 studies used qualitative and quantitative data-collection procedures (mixed methods). In contrast, no study contained 2 or more quantitative data-collection procedures. In particular, quantitative data-collection procedures—such as validated, reliable questionnaires, scales, or assessments—were not used exhaustively. The prerequisites for using multiple data-collection procedures are availability, the knowledge and skill of the researcher, and sufficient financial funds. 1 To meet these prerequisites, research teams consisting of members with different levels of training and experience are necessary. Multidisciplinary research teams need to be aware of the strengths and weaknesses of different data sources and collection procedures. 1

Qualitative methods of analysis and results

When using multiple data sources and analysis methods, it is necessary to present the results in a coherent manner. Although the importance of multiple data sources and analysis has been emphasized, 1 , 5 the description of triangulation has tended to be brief. Thus, traceability of the research process is not always ensured. The sparse description of the data-analysis triangulation procedure may be due to the limited number of words in publications or the complexity involved in merging the different data sources.

Only a few concrete recommendations regarding the operationalization of the data-analysis triangulation with the qualitative data process were found. 25 A total of 3 approaches have been proposed 25 : (1) the intuitive approach, in which researchers intuitively connect information from different data sources; (2) the procedural approach, in which each comparative or contrasting step in triangulation is documented to ensure transparency and replicability; and (3) the intersubjective approach, which necessitates a group of researchers agreeing on the steps in the triangulation process. For each case study, one of these 3 approaches needs to be selected, carefully carried out, and documented. Thus, in-depth examination of the data can take place. Farmer et al 25 concluded that most researchers take the intuitive approach; therefore, triangulation is not clearly articulated. This trend is also evident in our scoping review.

Mixed-methods analysis and results

Few studies in this scoping review used a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis. However, creating a comprehensive stand-alone picture of a case from both qualitative and quantitative methods is challenging. Findings derived from different data types may not automatically coalesce into a coherent whole. 4 O’Cathain et al 26 described 3 techniques for combining the results of qualitative and quantitative methods: (1) developing a triangulation protocol; (2) following a thread by selecting a theme from 1 component and following it across the other components; and (3) developing a mixed-methods matrix.

The most detailed description of the conducting of triangulation is the triangulation protocol. The triangulation protocol takes place at the interpretation stage of the research process. 26 This protocol was developed for multiple qualitative data but can also be applied to a combination of qualitative and quantitative data. 25 , 26 It is possible to determine agreement, partial agreement, “silence,” or dissonance between the results of qualitative and quantitative data. The protocol is intended to bring together the various themes from the qualitative and quantitative results and identify overarching meta-themes. 25 , 26

The “following a thread” technique is used in the analysis stage of the research process. To begin, each data source is analyzed to identify the most important themes that need further investigation. Subsequently, the research team selects 1 theme from 1 data source and follows it up in the other data source, thereby creating a thread. The individual steps of this technique are not specified. 26 , 27

A mixed-methods matrix is used at the end of the analysis. 26 All the data collected on a defined case are examined together in 1 large matrix, paying attention to cases rather than variables or themes. In a mixed-methods matrix (eg, a table), the rows represent the cases for which both qualitative and quantitative data exist. The columns show the findings for each case. This technique allows the research team to look for congruency, surprises, and paradoxes among the findings as well as patterns across multiple cases. In our review, we identified only one of these 3 approaches in the study by Roots and MacDonald. 20 These authors mentioned that a causal network analysis was performed using a matrix. However, no further details were given, and reference was made to a later publication. We could not find this publication.

Case Studies in Nursing Research and Recommendations

Because it focused on the implementation of NPs in primary health care, the setting of this scoping review was narrow. However, triangulation is essential for research in this area. This type of research was found to provide a good basis for understanding methodologic and data-analysis triangulation. Despite the lack of traceability in the description of the data and methodological triangulation, we believe that case studies are an appropriate design for exploring new nursing roles in existing health care systems. This is evidenced by the fact that case study research is widely used in many social science disciplines as well as in professional practice. 1 To strengthen this research method and increase the traceability in the research process, we recommend using the reporting guideline and reporting checklist by Rodgers et al. 9 This reporting checklist needs to be complemented with methodologic and data-analysis triangulation. A procedural approach needs to be followed in which each comparative step of the triangulation is documented. 25 A triangulation protocol or a mixed-methods matrix can be used for this purpose. 26 If there is a word limit in a publication, the triangulation protocol or mixed-methods matrix needs to be identified. A schematic representation of methodologic and data-analysis triangulation in case studies can be found in Figure 2 .

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 10.1177_01939459241263011-fig2.jpg

Schematic representation of methodologic and data-analysis triangulation in case studies (own work).

Limitations

This study suffered from several limitations that must be acknowledged. Given the nature of scoping reviews, we did not analyze the evidence reported in the studies. However, 2 reviewers independently reviewed all the full-text reports with respect to the inclusion criteria. The focus on the primary care setting with NPs (master’s degree) was very narrow, and only a few studies qualified. Thus, possible important methodological aspects that would have contributed to answering the questions were omitted. Studies describing the triangulation of 2 or more quantitative data-collection procedures could not be included in this scoping review due to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Conclusions

Given the various processes described for methodologic and data-analysis triangulation, we can conclude that triangulation in case studies is poorly standardized. Consequently, the traceability of the research process is not always given. Triangulation is complicated by the confusion of terminology. To advance case study research in nursing, we encourage authors to reflect critically on methodologic and data-analysis triangulation and use existing tools, such as the triangulation protocol or mixed-methods matrix and the reporting guideline checklist by Rodgers et al, 9 to ensure more transparent reporting.

Supplemental Material

Acknowledgments.

The authors thank Simona Aeschlimann for her support during the screening process.

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 10.1177_01939459241263011-img1.jpg

Supplemental Material: Supplemental material for this article is available online.

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

View all journals
Explore content
About the journal
Publish with us
Sign up for alerts
Research Briefing
Published: 26 August 2024

A structural learning method to uncover how information between single cells flows

Nature Methods ( 2024 ) Cite this article

1039 Accesses

10 Altmetric

Metrics details

Cellular signalling networks
Computational models

Single-cell RNA-sequencing and spatial transcriptomics data enable the inference of how information is transmitted from one cell to another and how it modulates gene expression within cells. Now, a learning method infers networks describing how the inflow of one signal, mediated by intracellular gene modules, drives the outflow of other signals for intercellular communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

24,99 € / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

251,40 € per year

only 20,95 € per issue

Buy this article

Purchase on SpringerLink
Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Armingol, E., Baghdassarian, H. M. & Lewis, N. E. The diversification of methods for studying cell–cell interactions and communication. Nat. Rev. Genet. 25 , 381–400 (2024). A review on methods to infer cell–cell communication from single-cell and spatial transcriptomics.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Welch, J. D. et al. Single-cell multi-omic integration compares and contrasts features of brain cell identity. Cell 177 , 1873–1887 (2019). This paper presents a method to infer gene expression modules from multi-condition scRNA-seq data.

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Sachs, K. et al. Causal protein-signaling networks derived from multiparameter single-cell data. Science 308 , 523–529 (2005). This paper applies a graphical model learning method to single-cell flow cytometry data to discover a directed signaling network.

Squires, C., Wang, Y. & Uhler, C. Permutation-based causal structure learning with unknown intervention targets. Proceedings of the 36th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI) 124 , 1039–1048 (2020). This paper develops a graphical model learning method that can handle both control datasets and datasets in which the perturbed targets are unknown.

Wang, L. et al. Dictys: dynamic gene regulatory network dissects developmental continuum with single-cell multiomics. Nat. Methods 20 , 1368–1378 (2023). A paper that uses a stochastic differential equations approach to infer dynamic gene regulatory networks from scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq data.

Download references

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This is a summary of: Almet, A. A., Tsai, Y.-C., Watanabe, M. & Nie, Q. Inferring pattern-driving intercellular flows from single-cell and spatial transcriptomics. Nat. Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-024-02380-w (2024).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

A structural learning method to uncover how information between single cells flows. Nat Methods (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-024-02381-9

Download citation

Published : 26 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-024-02381-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Quick links

Explore articles by subject
Guide to authors
Editorial policies

A case of successful surgical treatment of left ventricular thrombus associated with acute myocardial infarction by Impella combined with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation approach

Case Report
Artificial Heart (Clinical)
Published: 26 August 2024

Cite this article

Rieko Kutsuzawa 1 ,
Naoki Tadokoro ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4658-852X 1 , 3 ,
Satoshi Kainuma 1 ,
Naonori Kawamoto 1 ,
Kouta Suzuki 1 ,
Ayumi Ikuta 1 ,
Kohei Tonai 1 ,
Masaya Hirayama 1 ,
Yoshiyuki Tomishima 2 ,
Yasuhide Asaumi 2 &
Satsuki Fukushima 1 , 3

27 Accesses

Explore all metrics

The mortality rate in patients with heart failure complicated by cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains high, prompting research on mechanical circulatory support. Improved mortality rates have been reported with the early introduction of EcMELLA (Impella combined with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ECMO). However, clear indications for this treatment have not been established, given the associated risks and limitations related to access routes. Left ventricular thrombosis is traditionally considered a contraindication for Impella use. A 74-year-old man without specific medical history or coronary risk factors was diagnosed with Forrester IV heart failure due to cardiogenic shock complicated by AMI and left ventricular thrombosis. The patient underwent emergency coronary artery bypass surgery, intracardiac thrombus removal, and Dor surgery. Following cardiopulmonary bypass, ongoing heart failure was observed, necessitating the implementation of EcMELLA for circulatory support. Preoperative computed tomography showed that the bilateral subclavian arteries were too narrow (< 7 mm) and anatomically unsuitable for traditional access methods. Thus, we introduced a single-access EcMELLA 5.5, through which the Impella was introduced and veno-arterial-ECMO blood was delivered from a single artificial vessel anastomosed to the brachiocephalic artery. The patient was weaned off veno-arterial-ECMO and extubated on postoperative day 3. By postoperative day 14, improved cardiac function allowed for Impella removal. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 31 with improved ambulation; thereafter, the patient returned to work. Thus, the single-access EcMELLA5.5 treatment strategy combined with Dor procedure was effective in left ventricular thrombosis in patients with heart failure with cardiogenic shock complicated by AMI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

Get 10 units per month
Download Article/Chapter or eBook
1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Successful percutaneous coronary intervention with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a patient with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction complicated by electrical storm, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest: a case report

A case report of thrombotic complete obstruction of the ascending aorta as a complication of Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: steps to prevent thrombosis

Successful cardiac resuscitation with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the setting of persistent ventricular fibrillation: a case report

Explore related subjects.

Medical Imaging

Data availability

van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, Henry TD, Jacobs AK, Kapur NK. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock. Circulation. 2017;136:e232–68.

PubMed Google Scholar

Willekes CL, Fanning JS, Heiser JC, Sang SL, Timek TA, Parker J, et al. Randomized feasibility trial of prophylactic radiofrequency ablation to prevent atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024;167:2129-35.e1.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Vallabhajosyula S, O’Horo JC, Antharam P, Ananthaneni S, Vallabhajosyula S, John M, et al. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with concomitant Impella versus venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock. ASAIO J. 2020;66:497–503.

Kimura Y, Kondo T, Mutsuga M, Morimoto R, Kazama S, Shibata N, et al. Impella 5.0 for cardiogenic shock after thrombectomy in a patient with intraventricular thrombosis. Can J Cardiol. 2020;36:1690.e13-e5.

Schrage B, Becher PM, Bernhardt A, Bezerra H, Blankenberg S, Brunner S, et al. Left ventricular unloading is associated with lower mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation results from an international, multicenter cohort study. Circulation. 2020;142:2095–106.

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Tadokoro N, Tonai K, Kainuma S, Fukushima S. Single-vessel access venoarteial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella technique for acute cardiogenic shock complicated by lung congestion. Interdiscip CardioVasc Thorac Surg. 2023;37:ivad201.

PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Bitargil M, Pham S, Haddad O, Sareyyupoglu B. Single arterial access for Ecpella and jugular venous cannulation provides full mobility on a status 1 heart transplant recipient. ESC Heart Fail. 2022;9:2003–6.

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Editage for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Cardiac Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan

Rieko Kutsuzawa, Naoki Tadokoro, Satoshi Kainuma, Naonori Kawamoto, Kouta Suzuki, Ayumi Ikuta, Kohei Tonai, Masaya Hirayama & Satsuki Fukushima

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan

Yoshiyuki Tomishima & Yasuhide Asaumi

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Kishibe-shimmachi, 6-1, Suita, Osaka, 564-8565, Japan

Naoki Tadokoro & Satsuki Fukushima

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: Rieko Kutsuzawa and Naoki Tadokoro; methodology: Rieko Kutsuzawa, Naonori Kawamoto, Kota Suzuki, Ayumi Ikuta, Kohei Tonai, and Masaya Hirayama; data collection: Yoshiyuki Tomishima, Yoshiyuki Tomishima; writing—original draft preparation: Rieko Kutsuzawa; writing—review and editing: Naoki Tadokoro, Satoshi Kainuma, Yasuhide Asaumi, and Satsuki Fukushima; supervision: Satsuki Fukushima.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Naoki Tadokoro or Satsuki Fukushima .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest, ethics approval and consent to participate.

The patient in this study gave informed consent, which was approved by the NCVC Review Board (approval number: M30-026–5; approval date: 24 February 2022); this protocol has been found acceptable by them.

Consent for publication

The patient consented to the submission of the case report to the journal.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Kutsuzawa, R., Tadokoro, N., Kainuma, S. et al. A case of successful surgical treatment of left ventricular thrombus associated with acute myocardial infarction by Impella combined with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation approach. J Artif Organs (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-024-01469-5

Download citation

Received : 10 June 2024

Accepted : 12 August 2024

Published : 26 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-024-01469-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Heart failure
Acute myocardial infarction
Left ventricular thrombus
Dor procedure
Find a journal
Publish with us
Track your research

IMAGES

a single case study intervention
11 Single-Case Research Designs.
a single case study intervention
Single-Case Design Research Methods Brief
Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings
Institute of Education Sciences Summer Research Training Institute

VIDEO

SAMPLING PROCEDURE AND SAMPLE (QUALITATIVE RESEARCH)
Comparative Designs
Methods 37
Charting in Single Case Research
Single Case Research Designs
Yin (2003) Case Study Research pt 2 Research strategies compared

COMMENTS

Single-Case Design, Analysis, and Quality Assessment for Intervention Research
The purpose of this article is to describe single-case studies, and contrast them with case studies and randomized clinical trials. We will highlight current research designs, analysis techniques, and quality appraisal tools relevant for single-case rehabilitation ...
Single-Case Experimental Designs: A Systematic Review of Published
Although consensus exists along key dimensions of single-case research design and researchers appear to be practicing within these parameters, there remains a need for further evaluation of assessment and sampling techniques and data analytic methods. Keywords: daily diary, single-case experimental design, systematic review, time-series
Single-Case Designs
Single-case designs (also called single-case experimental designs) are system of research design strategies that can provide strong evidence of intervention effectiveness by using repeated measurement to establish each participant (or case) as his or her own control. Although the methods were initially developed as tools for studying basic ...
Single Case Research Design
This chapter addresses the peculiarities, characteristics, and major fallacies of single case research designs. A single case study research design is a collective term for an in-depth analysis of a small non-random sample. The focus on this design is on in-depth....
Single-Case Intervention Research
This book is a compendium of tools and information for researchers considering single-case design (SCD) research, a newly viable and often essential methodology in applied psychology, education, and related fields.
The Family of Single-Case Experimental Designs
Abstract. Single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) represent a family of research designs that use experimental methods to study the effects of treatments on outcomes. The fundamental unit of analysis is the single case—which can be an individual, clinic, or community—ideally with replications of effects within and/or between cases.
Single Case Research
Single Case Research (SCR) is also known as single-case experimental design (SCED). This is a research methodology using a single unit of analysis and characterized by repeated measures over time. Welcome to the SCR website designed to provide free calculators and source information on analysis methods including published papers, manuscripts in ...
The Family of Single-Case Experimental Designs
Abstract Single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) represent a family of research designs that use experimental methods to study the effects of treatments on outcomes. The fundamental unit of analysis is the single case—which can be an individual, clinic, or community—ideally with replications of effects within and/or between cases.
Single‐case experimental designs: Characteristics, changes, and
Tactics of Scientific Research (Sidman, 1960) provides a visionary treatise on single-case designs, their scientific underpinnings, and their critical role in understanding behavior. Since the founda...
[PDF] Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied
Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings. Now thoroughly updated in its second edition, acclaimed author Alan E. Kazdin's Single-Case Research Designs provides a notable contrast to the quantitative methodology approach that pervades the biological and social sciences.
Single Case Research Methodology
ABSTRACT. Single Case Research Methodology, 3 rd Edition presents a thorough, technically sound, user-friendly, and comprehensive discussion of single case research methodology. This book can serve as a detailed and complex reference tool for students, researchers, and practitioners who intend to conduct single case research design studies ...
Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings
Single-case research has played an important role in developing and evaluating interventions that are designed to alter a particular facet of human functioning. Now thoroughly updated in its second edition, acclaimed author Alan Kazdin's Single-Case Research Designs provides a notable contrast to the quantitative methodology approach that pervades the biological and social sciences. While ...
Sage Research Methods
Single-Case Research Methods for the Behavioral and Health Sciences. baseline, clients, decision making, health sciences, managed care, population, …. This text introduces readers to the history, epistemology, and strategies of single-case research design. The authors offer concrete information on how to observe, measure, and interpret change ...
The Advantages and Limitations of Single Case Study Analysis
In summary, the various forms of single case study analysis can - through the application of multiple qualitative and/or quantitative research methods - provide a nuanced, empirically-rich, holistic account of specific phenomena.
Single-case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings
Single-case research has played an important role in developing and evaluating interventions that are designed to alter a particular facet of human functioning. Now thoroughly updated in its second edition, acclaimed author Alan E. Kazdin's Single-Case Research Designs provides a notable contrast to the quantitative methodology approach that pervades the biological and social sciences. While ...
Mixed Methods Single Case Research: State of the Art and Future
Abstract Mixed methods single case research (MMSCR) is research in which single case experimental and qualitative case study methodologies, and their accompanying sets of methods and techniques, are integrated to answer research questions that concern a single case. This article discusses the historical roots and the distinct nature of MMSCR, the kinds of knowledge MMSCR produces, its ...
Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings
Now thoroughly updated in its third edition, acclaimed author Alan E. Kazdin's Single-Case Research Designs provides a notable contrast to the quantitative methodology approach that pervades the biological and social sciences.
Case Study Methodology of Qualitative Research: Key Attributes and
Abstract A case study is one of the most commonly used methodologies of social research. This article attempts to look into the various dimensions of a case study research strategy, the different epistemological strands which determine the particular case study type and approach adopted in the field, discusses the factors which can enhance the effectiveness of a case study research, and the ...
Advancing the Application and Use of Single-Case Research Designs
With this special issue the editors have challenged authors to articulate the advances in research design and data analysis that will be needed if single-case methods are to meet these emerging expectations. Each recruited article delves into a specific avenue of concern for advancing the use of single-case methods.
Single-Case Research Methods: History and Suitability for a
This paper presents a historical and conceptual analysis of a group of research strategies known as the Single-Case Methods (SCMs). First, we present an overview of the SCMs, their history, and their major proponents. We will argue that the philosophical roots of SCMs can be found in the ideas of au …
A systematic review of applied single-case research published between
Single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) have become a popular research methodology in educational science, psychology, and beyond. The growing popularity has been accompanied by the development of specific guidelines for the conduct and analysis of SCEDs. In this paper, we examine recent practices in the conduct and analysis of SCEDs by systematically reviewing applied SCEDs published over a ...
Single Case Research Design
This chapter addresses single-case research designs’ peculiarities, characteristics, and significant fallacies. A single case research design is a collective term for an in-depth analysis of a small non-random sample. The focus of this design is in-depth. This...
Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings
Now thoroughly updated in its second edition, acclaimed author Alan E. Kazdin's Single-Case Research Designs provides a notable contrast to the quantitative methodology approach that pervades the biological and social sciences.
Applied Sciences
Therefore, many researchers have optimized mine ventilation [10,11].For example, S. A. Kozyrev [] uses modern mathematical methods to improve the automatic design planning of mine ventilation systems and discusses the prospect of genetic methods for analyzing alternative ventilation systems in the design stage.In addition, new monitoring technology greatly facilitates the monitoring of mine ...
Methodologic and Data-Analysis Triangulation in Case Studies: A Scoping
A case study relies on multiple sources of evidence, with data needing to converge in a triangulating fashion." 1(p15) This design is described as a stand-alone research approach equivalent to grounded theory and can entail single and multiple cases. 1,2 However, case study research should not be confused with single clinical case reports.
A structural learning method to uncover how information between single
Research Briefing; Published: 26 August 2024; ... This paper applies a graphical model learning method to single-cell flow cytometry data to discover a directed signaling network.
A case of successful surgical treatment of left ventricular ...
Preoperative computed tomography showed that the bilateral subclavian arteries were too narrow (< 7 mm) and anatomically unsuitable for traditional access methods. Thus, we introduced a single-access EcMELLA 5.5, through which the Impella was introduced and veno-arterial-ECMO blood was delivered from a single artificial vessel anastomosed to ...

Single-Case Intervention Research

You may also like

Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings

2,708 Citations

Applying Empirical Methods in Clinical Practice: Introducing the Model for Assessing Treatment Effect

Get Citation

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Advantages and Limitations of Single Case Study Analysis

Further Reading on E-International Relations

Save citation to file

Add to My Bibliography

Single-Case Research Methods: History and Suitability for a Psychological Science in Need of Alternatives

Similar articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Sorry, there was a problem.

Image Unavailable

Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings 2nd Edition

Editorial Reviews

Customer reviews

Customers say

Reviews with images

Used means damaged I guess

Top reviews from the United States

Information

Initiatives

Article Menu

JSmol Viewer

1. Introduction

Share and Cite

Article Metrics

Methodologic and Data-Analysis Triangulation in Case Studies: A Scoping Review

Maya Zumstein-Shaha

Associated Data

Design and methods:

Data sources:

Conclusions:

Stage 1: Establishing the Research Question

Stage 2: Identifying Relevant Studies

Stage 3: Selecting the Studies

Screening process

Stages 4 and 5: Charting the Data and Collating, Summarizing, and Reporting the Results

Research Question, Case Definition, and Case Study Design

Research question

Case definition and case study design

Within-Method Triangulation

Qualitative approach

Observations

Public documents

Electronic health records

Between/Across-Method Triangulation

Mixed methods

Observation

Individual journals

Service records

Questionnaires/Assessment

Data-Analysis Triangulation

Mixed-methods analysis

Qualitative methods of analysis

Within-case analysis

Cross-case analyses

Confirmation or contradiction of data

Confirmation or contradiction among qualitative data

Confirmation through a combination of qualitative and quantitative data

Contradiction through a combination of qualitative and quantitative data

Research Question and Design

Methodologic Triangulation

Within-Method and Between/Across-Method Triangulation

Qualitative methods of analysis and results

Mixed-methods analysis and results

Case Studies in Nursing Research and Recommendations

Limitations

Conclusions

Supplemental Material

A structural learning method to uncover how information between single cells flows

Access options

Additional information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Share this article