what's a rebuttal in a essay

• Link to facebook
• Link to linkedin
• Link to twitter
• Link to youtube
• Writing Tips

A Guide to Rebuttals in Argumentative Essays

4-minute read

• 27th May 2023

Rebuttals are an essential part of a strong argument. But what are they, exactly, and how can you use them effectively? Read on to find out.

What Is a Rebuttal?

When writing an argumentative essay , there’s always an opposing point of view. You can’t present an argument without the possibility of someone disagreeing.

Sure, you could just focus on your argument and ignore the other perspective, but that weakens your essay. Coming up with possible alternative points of view, or counterarguments, and being prepared to address them, gives you an edge. A rebuttal is your response to these opposing viewpoints.

How Do Rebuttals Work?

With a rebuttal, you can take the fighting power away from any opposition to your idea before they have a chance to attack. For a rebuttal to work, it needs to follow the same formula as the other key points in your essay: it should be researched, developed, and presented with evidence.

Rebuttals in Action

Suppose you’re writing an essay arguing that strawberries are the best fruit. A potential counterargument could be that strawberries don’t work as well in baked goods as other berries do, as they can get soggy and lose some of their flavor. Your rebuttal would state this point and then explain why it’s not valid:

Read on for a few simple steps to formulating an effective rebuttal.

Step 1. Come up with a Counterargument

A strong rebuttal is only possible when there’s a strong counterargument. You may be convinced of your idea but try to place yourself on the other side. Rather than addressing weak opposing views that are easy to fend off, try to come up with the strongest claims that could be made.

In your essay, explain the counterargument and agree with it. That’s right, agree with it – to an extent. State why there’s some truth to it and validate the concerns it presents.

Step 2. Point Out Its Flaws

Now that you’ve presented a counterargument, poke holes in it . To do so, analyze the argument carefully and notice if there are any biases or caveats that weaken it. Looking at the claim that strawberries don’t work well in baked goods, a weakness could be that this argument only applies when strawberries are baked in a pie.

Find this useful?

Subscribe to our newsletter and get writing tips from our editors straight to your inbox.

Step 3. Present New Points

Once you reveal the counterargument’s weakness, present a new perspective, and provide supporting evidence to show that your argument is still the correct one. This means providing new points that the opposer may not have considered when presenting their claim.

Offering new ideas that weaken a counterargument makes you come off as authoritative and informed, which will make your readers more likely to agree with you.

Summary: Rebuttals

Rebuttals are essential when presenting an argument. Even if a counterargument is stronger than your point, you can construct an effective rebuttal that stands a chance against it.

We hope this guide helps you to structure and format your argumentative essay . And once you’ve finished writing, send a copy to our expert editors. We’ll ensure perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, referencing, and more. Try it out for free today!

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a rebuttal in an essay.

A rebuttal is a response to a counterargument. It presents the potential counterclaim, discusses why it could be valid, and then explains why the original argument is still correct.

How do you form an effective rebuttal?

To use rebuttals effectively, come up with a strong counterclaim and respectfully point out its weaknesses. Then present new ideas that fill those gaps and strengthen your point.

Share this article:

Post A New Comment

Got content that needs a quick turnaround? Let us polish your work. Explore our editorial business services.

5-minute read

Free Email Newsletter Template (2024)

Promoting a brand means sharing valuable insights to connect more deeply with your audience, and...

6-minute read

How to Write a Nonprofit Grant Proposal

If you’re seeking funding to support your charitable endeavors as a nonprofit organization, you’ll need...

9-minute read

How to Use Infographics to Boost Your Presentation

Is your content getting noticed? Capturing and maintaining an audience’s attention is a challenge when...

8-minute read

Why Interactive PDFs Are Better for Engagement

Are you looking to enhance engagement and captivate your audience through your professional documents? Interactive...

7-minute read

Seven Key Strategies for Voice Search Optimization

Voice search optimization is rapidly shaping the digital landscape, requiring content professionals to adapt their...

Five Creative Ways to Showcase Your Digital Portfolio

Are you a creative freelancer looking to make a lasting impression on potential clients or...

Make sure your writing is the best it can be with our expert English proofreading and editing.

How To Write A Rebuttal In An Essay

What is a rebuttal in writing.

When writing an essay, rebutting is one way to argue points or facts that have been stated. It will directly oppose any view and will include reasons for your claims being valid. When including this in an essay, you will be acknowledging what the opposition is saying, but will continue to argue your own points. Here, you can see how to write a good rebuttal that will be easy to understand while getting your point across.

Why Are Rebuttal Paragraphs Important?

When planning to include a rebuttal in an argumentative essay, it is essential to know how to write a rebuttal paragraph. Students should plan an outline for an argumentative essay and know where to place these paragraphs. These are used for arguing points that have been made. They will appear after the main argument in an essay. When working on these paragraphs, it is important for there to be evidence that supports your arguments.

These paragraphs will introduce your opposing argument and will also acknowledge that some parts of the opposition are valid points. It will also be used for introducing the conclusion of the essay. Learning how to include these paragraphs is not always an easy task. If you need help with your essay, you can hire an argumentative essay writer that has experience including counterarguments. With professional help, students can create a powerful argument that will attract the attention of the reader and be backed with evidence.

How to Start Refuting

To get started, a three-part organization process should be used. You must have a complete understanding of the opposing viewpoint. Know who the intended audience is, what message is being sent, and what points you agree with. You will then analyze the argument and determine your position. The argument may contain untrue statements or claims that cannot be verified.

Additional research will then have to be performed. You need to back up your statements with facts and evidence when you write a counterargument. It will be important to fact-check any of the opposition’s arguments and collect reliable data that can disprove these.

Using Effective Transition Words

Transition words and phrases are key things that one should consider when writing an argumentative paper. They act as bridges and will connect your ideas and arguments. Transition words will help your reader identify the counter argument and rebuttal you are writing. It is an effective way of making the argument clearer. When you are creating a refutation essay, it is important you include these words. Some common transition phrases that can be used when writing include:

•       However
•       Instead of
•       On the other hand
•       In contrast
•       It can be argued that
•       The problem with that

As you write a rebuttal in a sentence, be sure you use words that will easily connect the two things being compared or contrasted. These words will show a relationship between arguments and will link one idea to the next being presented.

Rebuttal Examples In an Argumentative Essay

You will have to make your arguments in essays on various topics. It is important to know the proper argumentative essay structure before getting started. Once this has been addressed, you can start to work on the counter-argument. For example, let’s say that the essay focuses on the violence children learn from video games. The objection being made is that these games cause children to use guns and shoot people.

You would then assert that violence in media existed long before the creation of video games. You would then make a counterargument that may state:

“Some may argue that certain video games include violent scenes that cause children to use guns. Youth violence does appear to be on the rise. However, before video games, there were other courses of violence that children had been exposed to. To blame video games, one would have to ignore the effect of movies, books, music, and other forms of media.”

In this example, the counter-argument addresses the initial point and acknowledges validity. It then makes use of transition words to present a different view, backed by research stating that other types of media have also had an impact on the rise of violence.

Being able to make a concise counter-argument is not always easy. It should be short and to the point. With a custom argumentative essay writing service , you can get help from experienced writers who know how to generate an effective counter-argument.

Common Mistakes To Avoid While Writing Refutation Sentences

There are some common mistakes that are often made by students when writing essays. This is why using a custom essay writing service can be beneficial. The professionals with these services will know how to properly structure an essay and know how to do a rebuttal in an essay. Here, you can learn about the mistakes that should be avoided when writing sentences and paragraphs.

•       Irrelevant counter-argument
•       Single sentence refutations
•       Repeating points already made
•       Not using transition words
•       Lack of research
•       Not citing sources and references
•       Being emotional
•       Relying on fallacies
•       Failure to fact-check
•       Poor structure and grammar

Avoiding these will ensure that any arguments made against an oppositional point will be effective.

Know that you know how to refute the points of the opposition and have this be an effective piece of an essay, you can create a paper that presents your view and supporting facts. While these essays can be difficult to structure, there are many resources online and services that can be of use. With the help me do my assignment service, you can gain access to expert advice that can help you with your essay structure and make sure that you avoid any common mistakes. Additionally, experienced professionals can provide guidance on how to effectively use transition words and how to start your essay. Knowing that you have this kind of assistance can make the essay writing process much less daunting.

Do you need a rebuttal in a synthesis essay?

This is not needed in a synthesis essay. These essays have an intro that provides the topic, a body that offers an objective two-sided interpretation, info from multiple sources, as well as citations, and a conclusion.

Which rebuttal would be ineffective in an argumentative essay?

If it takes the opposition’s point, acknowledges it, and then uses words to insult that point, it would be considered to be ineffective when drafting an argumentative essay.

Does a persuasive essay have a refutation?

Refutations are not used in persuasive essays. They are found in argumentative essays, where the writer is arguing a point and proving it is false by providing their own ideas and facts.

Related posts:

• How To Write A Good Compare And Contrast Essay: Topics, Examples And Step-by-step Guide

How to Write a Scholarship Essay

• The Best Online AP Courses For High School Students [Full Guide]
• Explaining Appeal to Ignorance Fallacy with Demonstrative Examples

Improve your writing with our guides

Definition Essay: The Complete Guide with Essay Topics and Examples

Critical Essay: The Complete Guide. Essay Topics, Examples and Outlines

Get 15% off your first order with edusson.

Connect with a professional writer within minutes by placing your first order. No matter the subject, difficulty, academic level or document type, our writers have the skills to complete it.

100% privacy. No spam ever.

• How It Works
• Prices & Discounts

A Student's Guide: Crafting an Effective Rebuttal in Argumentative Essays

Table of contents

Share this article

Achieve Academic Success with Expert Assistance!

Crafted from Scratch for You.

Ensuring Your Work’s Originality.

Transform Your Draft into Excellence.

Perfecting Your Paper’s Grammar, Style, and Format (APA, MLA, etc.).

Calculate the cost of your paper

Get ideas for your essay

25 Rebuttal Examples

Chris Drew (PhD)

Dr. Chris Drew is the founder of the Helpful Professor. He holds a PhD in education and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. [Image Descriptor: Photo of Chris]

Learn about our Editorial Process

Rebuttal is the process of presenting a counterargument to someone else’s claims or debate points. It is an essential element in the realm of debate and negotiations.

To rebut is not merely to disagree. It needs to be a thoughtful, factual, and logical response to the argument presented.

Some common methods of rebuttal include:

• Fact-checking: Go through the opponent’s fact claims and analyze each one to see if it’s accurate.
• Counterexamples: Provide real-life examples that demonstrate flaws in the opponent’s arguments.
• Ethical dispute: Counter the opponent’s perspective on ethical or moral grounds.

I’ll explore some more methods below.

Rebuttal Examples

1. fact-checking.

Fact-checking simply refers to looking at the series of claims presented by an opponent and seeing if they are factually accurate. You’ll do this by scrutinizing the accuracy of the information presented by the other side. If your opponent’s argument rests on incorrect or inaccurate facts, exposing these inaccuracies can quickly dismantle the structure of their argument.

Example: Suppose your opponent states, “Global warming is a hoax; last winter was extremely cold!” Your rebuttal could be, “Weather and climate are different. Despite a cold winter, long-term data supports global warming.” Here, you’ve used fact-checking to debunk the misleading statement.

2. Counterexamples

Counterexamples involve providing your own examples that challenge the claims made by the opponent. The goal is to offer a scenario or instance that directly contradicts or disproves the opposing argument argument, This can undermine the validity of your opponent, showing how it doesn’t hold up in all real-life circumstances.

Example: If an adversary argues, “All rich people are successful because they have money”, you could provide a counterexample such as, “John is wealthy due to inheritance, but he has not achieved any personal or professional success.” Through this demonstration, you’ve effectively countered the claim being made.

3. Logical Reasoning

Logical reasoning is all about using a systematic series of analytical steps to see if each point logically follows from the one before it, with no leaps or gaps. Often, this does require you to look at the points step-by-step, trying to find instances where one point does not logically lead to another. By demonstrating that the opponent’s stance lacks logical coherence, and yours is logical, you can effectively nullify their argument.

Example: Let’s say someone asserts, “Eating ice cream makes you happy. Therefore, if everyone ate ice cream daily, there would be no sadness in the world.” Your rebuttal could involve logical reasoning: “While ice cream might provide a temporary boost, it doesn’t address complex causes of sadness or depression.” In this example, you’ve pointed out the simplistic and illogical nature of the original claim.

See More: Reasoning Examples

4. Highlighting Inconsistencies

This method of rebuttal zeroes in on contradictions within the opponent’s argument. The objective is to capture instances where they have made one point in one instance, and another in the next instance, and those two points contradict each other. Recognizing and pointing out these inconsistencies can demonstrate a weakness in their viewpoints and invalidate their overall argument.

Example: Suppose an opponent argues, “Cutting taxes stimulates business growth and should be applied universally,” but then contradicts themselves by stating, “Government services like healthcare and education need more funding.” By calling out the inconsistency between wanting lower taxes but more public services, you successfully weaken their argument.

5. Reductio ad Absurdum

Reductio ad Absurdum means “reducing an argument to absurdity”. This method involves taking the opponent’s argument to its most extreme logical conclusion and pointing out how irrational or implausible that conclusion would be. By doing so, this makes the other side’s argument appear unreasonable or nonsensical.

Example: Assume an opponent’s claim is, “Everyone should be allowed to say whatever they want, whenever they want, as an exercise of free speech.” Your rebuttal using reductio ad absurdum could be: “By that logic, should someone be allowed to falsely yell ‘fire’ in a crowded theater because of free speech? Surely that would lead to unnecessary panic and potential danger.”

See More: Reductio ad Absurdum Examples

6. Empirical Evidence

Empirical evidence puts forth real-world, verifiable data as a counterpoint to an opponent’s argument. It involves using objective facts, measurement, or observations to directly contest a claim. The strength of this form of rebuttal is that it appeals to tangible and measurable information that is difficult to refute, especially if it’s based on the scientific method.

Example: If an opponent argues, “Schools with standardized uniforms perform better academically,” you could counter with empirical evidence: “Many top-scoring countries in international education ranking, such as Finland, do not mandate school uniforms.”

See More: Empirical Evidence Examples

7. Expert Testimony

Calling on expert testimony as a form of rebuttal means citing a specialist or a professional to disprove the opponent’s argument. This could be a scientist, an academic, a historian, or any acknowledged authority on the topic being discussed. Their words typically carry weight due to their expertise in the field and can debunk the opposing argument, adding credibility to your own. But be careful of the appeal to authority fallacy – make sure the expert is actually an expert in the field, with strong evidence backing them.

Example: In a debate on climate change, if someone claims that “Climate change is cyclical and not significantly impacted by human activities,” you could rebut with expert testimony from reputable climate scientists: “Overwhelming consensus in the scientific community supports the fact that human activities, particularly carbon emissions, play a major role in accelerating climate change.”

8. Precedent

When using precedent as a rebuttal, your goal is to demonstrate that past events do not support the opponent’s claims. This might refer to exemplar events, past rulings in courts, past research, and any other established facts that could counter an opposing argument. If an opponent’s point is unprecedented or contradicts what has worked before, pointing out such an inconsistency can be an effective rebuttal.

Example: If an opponent argues that “The death penalty is an effective means to control crime,” you could rebut based on precedent: “Numerous studies based on precedents, such as states without the death penalty experiencing lower crime rates, indicate that the death penalty does not effectively deter crime.”

An analogy is a form of rebuttal where you draw a parallel with another situation to demonstrate flaws or absurdity in the opponent’s arguments. By pulling in an example that’s easy for audiences to understand, you can clearly show why the contrasting argument might not hold water.

Example: If your adversary insists, “We shouldn’t take action on climate change unless all countries agree to work together,” you could illustrate the weakness of this argument with an analogy: “If your roof was leaking, would you wait for your neighbors’ roofs to leak before you fixed yours? No, you’d take action immediately.”

10. Reframing the Argument

Reframing your opponent’s argument involves changing the perspective or emphasis of the conversation in order to challenge their standpoint. According to this tactic, you contest not necessarily the points made by your opponent, but the way they’ve chosen to present it. By putting the argument into another context or highlighting a different aspect of the problem, this method offers a fresh viewpoint to the audience.

Example: If an opponent asserts, “Cutting down on meat consumption hurts the farming industry,” your reframing could be: “We should be focusing on how the farming industry can adapt and grow more sustainable practices, which is a more reasonable solution to this problem.”

11. Pointing Out Fallacies

This rebuttal technique involves calling attention to logical fallacies—an error in reasoning—in the opponent’s argument. Logical Fallacies can often sound persuasive, but they tend to crumble under close scrutiny. By pointing them out, you show the audience that the argument being made is not as sound as it appears to be.

Example: If an opponent claims, “Most famous writers were heavy drinkers, so drinking must enhance creativity,” you could counter by highlighting the fallacy of the argument: “That’s a correlation-causation fallacy. It incorrectly assumes that being a heavy drinker leads to creativity, neglecting other factors like hard work or innate talent.”

See More: The Types of Fallacies

12. Historical Context

This form of rebuttal invokes history to challenge an opponent’s argument. Here, you draw examples from past events or periods to refute their claims or show that their argument is not compatible with historical accounts. It emphasizes how understanding context can change the meaning or implications of an argument. This is similar to precedent , outlined above.

Example: If someone posits, “The colonization period allowed for the spread of civilization to other parts of the world,” you could challenge this with historical context: “Your claim overlooks the many atrocities, human rights abuses, and cultural erasures that also took place during colonization.”

See More: Historical Context Examples

13. Ethical/Moral Grounds

This rebuttal method involves challenging the ethical or moral stance taken by the opponent in their argument. It is often used when the debate revolves around issues of moral judgement or ethical choices. The key here is to show that the opponent’s argument contradicts widely accepted moral or ethical standards.

Example: If an opponent declares, “It’s acceptable to test cosmetics on animals because it ensures the safety of the product for human use,” you could respond on ethical grounds: “Animal testing relies on causing harm to sentient beings, which many consider to be an unethical practice, regardless of the intended outcomes.”

See More: Ethical Dilemma Examples

14. Clarifying Definitions

This rebuttal strategy aims to disprove an opponent’s argument by clarifying or disputing the definitions of terms or concepts they have used. The goal is to expose any incorrect or misunderstood use of these terms, which may be the basis for their contention. Establishing a shared understanding of the terms being used often leads to generating more precise arguments.

Example: If an opponent argues, “Homeschooling is neglectful because it isolates children,” you could challenge their definition of homeschooling: “This contention is based on a misconception. Homeschooled children often interact with peers in community activities, cooperative learning endeavors, sports teams, and volunteer work.”

15. Challenging Assumptions

Challenging the assumptions of your opponent’s argument involves exposing and addressing the baseless or unsupported claims they have made. Such assumptions often underpin the core of their argument, and tearing them down can effectively challenge their stance.

Example: In a debate on public transport, if an opponent asserts, “Public transportation will always be less efficient than private cars,” you could challenge the underlying assumption, stating, “Your argument assumes all public transit is inefficient. Many cities globally have efficient, well-managed public transport systems.”

See More: Assumptions Examples

16. Demonstrating Bias

Demonstrating bias is a form of rebuttal where you show that your opponent’s argument may be rooted in personal or institutional bias. The bias could skew the evidence they present or the way they interpret it. Providing evidence of these biases may discredit your opponent’s argument, illustrating that it’s not derived from balanced analysis.

Example: If an opponent cites an article from a known politically biased journalist, arguing, “According to this article, cutting environmental regulations promotes industrial growth,” you can rebut by demonstrating bias: “We should consider the source of this article, the journalist has a record of arguing for deregulation and could be presenting the information with an inherent bias.”

See More: A List of Types of Bias

17. Questioning Sources

Questioning sources involves examining the credibility and reliability of the information that your opponent presents in their argument. In the era of rampant misinformation, it has become increasingly necessary to verify sources of information. By questioning the legitimacy of your opponent’s sources, you can potentially undermine their argument.

Example: If an opponent uses a social media post to support their argument, “A post on Facebook revealed that vaccines cause autism,” you could question the source, asserting, “Social media posts are not credible sources of health information. Reputable scientific studies repeatedly confirm that there is no link between vaccines and autism.”

See More: Best Sources to Cite in Essays

18. Comparative Analysis

Comparative analysis as a rebuttal involves comparing the opponent’s argument or case to another scenario or instance where the outcomes were different, thus disproving their claim. It’s about taking a similar but not identical situation and drawing relevant conclusions.

Example: If your opponent insists, “A strict dress code in the office improves productivity,” you could employ a comparative analysis: “Tech companies like Google and Facebook, known for their relaxed dress codes, have consistently ranked high in productivity.”

19. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis revolves around using empirical data, numbers, and statistics to disprove an opponent’s argument. Well-conducted research yields statistics that represent factual, quantifiable evidence which can be persuasive in a debate.

Example: If an opponent claims, “Children who watch more TV perform worse academically,” your rebuttal could involve statistical analysis: “A recent large-scale study showed no significant correlation between time spent watching TV and academic performance, once controlled for other factors like socioeconomic status and parental education level.”

20. Exposing Oversimplifications

Oversimplifications often occur when an opponent reduces a complex problem into an overly simple cause and effect relation. Tackling such oversimplifications requires you to expose the inherent complexity of the issue, highlighting that reality is more nuanced than the opponent’s portrayal.

Example: If an opponent posits, “Unemployment is simply due to laziness”, your rebuttal could be, “Such a claim dramatically oversimplifies a multifaceted issue. Unemployment can be caused by various economic factors such as automation, outsourcing, and economic downturns.”

See More: Oversimplification Examples

21. Highlighting Missing Information

Missing information, or gaps in information, can weaken an argument. If you can identify and point out this missing information, it can undermine the validity of the opponent’s argument, leading to a powerful rebuttal.

Example: Should your adversary argue, “Banning soft drinks in schools will solve the obesity problem,” your counter-argument could highlight missing information: “This argument overlooks other more significant aspects of diet and lifestyle, such as the foods parents put in children’s lunch boxes.”

22. Demonstrating Irrelevance

Demonstrating irrelevance involves showing that the opponent’s argument or a part of it is not relevant to the issue at hand. This can be a formidable rebuttal strategy as it invalidates the opponent’s argument without necessarily proving it wrong. This is related to pointing out the red herring fallacy in an opponent’s argument.

Example: If someone argues, “Solar energy will never work because it’s not always sunny,” you could demonstrate irrelevance: “Modern solar energy systems store power for use during cloudy days or nights, making this argument irrelevant.”

23. Pointing Out Contradictions

Pointing out contradictions involves identifying and spotlighting points in an opponent’s argument that contradict each other. This approach is potent because it shows a lack of coherence in the other side’s argument, which undermines its strength and credibility.

Example: If an opponent argues, “We should focus on developing green energy to combat climate change, yet we must continue to support coal industries for job preservation,” you could expose the contradiction: “Your argument contradicts itself because promoting coal industries undermines the push towards green energy, which you acknowledge is crucial for combating climate change.”

See More: Contradiction Examples

24. Challenging the Significance

This technique disputes the importance or relevance of the points presented by your opponent. Even if their facts are correct, you may argue that they are insignificant in the broader context of the issue at hand, thus deflating the impact of their argument.

Example: In a debate about healthy diets, if someone states, “Quinoa is expensive, so eating healthy is not affordable,” you could counter by challenging the significance: “While quinoa may be costly, there are many affordable healthy eating options, like fruits, vegetables, and whole grains. So, the cost of quinoa is not representative of a healthy diet’s overall cost.”

25. Using Humor or Satire

While this method requires a careful touch and a responsive audience, using humor or satire can be an effective way to disassemble an opponent’s argument. By making light of the situation or the argument, you can create a connection with the audience and subtly chip away at the integrity of the opponent’s case.

Example: Suppose an opponent argues, “People should stop using the internet because it’s filled with false information.” In response, you could say, “Well, if we avoided everything with a little bit of false information, we’d never be able to watch a superhero movie or read a fairy tale again.”

The skill of rebuttal is essential for good debaters. But be careful to ensure your rebuttals are sound and foolproof. You don’t want to fall into the same traps as your opponent, but engaging with logical fallacies or flawed arguments. Select rebuttals that steelman your case while helping to cast doubt and uncertainty in the points of your opponents.

• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 10 Reasons you’re Perpetually Single
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 20 Montessori Toddler Bedrooms (Design Inspiration)
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 21 Montessori Homeschool Setups
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 101 Hidden Talents Examples

1 thought on “25 Rebuttal Examples”

Another helpful and simple to understand publication by Chris. I have learnt so much from reading Professor Chris numerous articles online and I love this latest article with examples. Thank you.

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Usage and Examples of a Rebuttal

Weakening an Opponent's Claim With Facts

David Hume Kennerly/Wikimedia Commons/Public Domain

• An Introduction to Punctuation
• Ph.D., Rhetoric and English, University of Georgia
• M.A., Modern English and American Literature, University of Leicester
• B.A., English, State University of New York

A rebuttal takes on a couple of different forms. As it pertains to an argument or debate, the definition of a rebuttal is the presentation of evidence and reasoning meant to weaken or undermine an opponent's claim. However, in persuasive speaking, a rebuttal is typically part of a discourse with colleagues and rarely a stand-alone speech.

Rebuttals are used in law, public affairs, and politics, and they're in the thick of effective public speaking. They also can be found in academic publishing, editorials, letters to the editor, formal responses to personnel matters, or customer service complaints/reviews. A rebuttal is also called a counterargument.

Types and Occurrences of Rebuttals

Rebuttals can come into play during any kind of argument or occurrence where someone has to defend a position contradictory to another opinion presented. Evidence backing up the rebuttal position is key.

Formally, students use rebuttal in debate competitions. In this arena, rebuttals don't make new arguments , just battle the positions already presented in a specific, timed format. For example, a rebuttal may get four minutes after an argument is presented in eight.

In academic publishing, an author presents an argument in a paper, such as on a work of literature, stating why it should be seen in a particular light. A rebuttal letter about the paper can find the flaws in the argument and evidence cited, and present contradictory evidence. If a writer of a paper has the paper rejected for publishing by the journal, a well-crafted rebuttal letter can give further evidence of the quality of the work and the due diligence taken to come up with the thesis or hypothesis.

In law, an attorney can present a rebuttal witness to show that a witness on the other side is in error. For example, after the defense has presented its case, the prosecution can present rebuttal witnesses. This is new evidence only and witnesses that contradict defense witness testimony. An effective rebuttal to a closing argument in a trial can leave enough doubt in the jury's minds to have a defendant found not guilty.

In public affairs and politics, people can argue points in front of the local city council or even speak in front of their state government. Our representatives in Washington present diverging points of view on bills up for debate . Citizens can argue policy and present rebuttals in the opinion pages of the newspaper.

On the job, if a person has a complaint brought against him to the human resources department, that employee has a right to respond and tell his or her side of the story in a formal procedure, such as a rebuttal letter.

In business, if a customer leaves a poor review of service or products on a website, the company's owner or a manager will, at minimum, need to diffuse the situation by apologizing and offering a concession for goodwill. But in some cases, a business needs to be defended. Maybe the irate customer left out of the complaint the fact that she was inebriated and screaming at the top of her lungs when she was asked to leave the shop. Rebuttals in these types of instances need to be delicately and objectively phrased.

Characteristics of an Effective Rebuttal

"If you disagree with a comment, explain the reason," says Tim Gillespie in "Doing Literary Criticism." He notes that "mocking, scoffing, hooting, or put-downs reflect poorly on your character and on your point of view. The most effective rebuttal to an opinion with which you strongly disagree is an articulate counterargument."

Rebuttals that rely on facts are also more ethical than those that rely solely on emotion or diversion from the topic through personal attacks on the opponent. That is the arena where politics, for example, can stray from trying to communicate a message into becoming a reality show.

With evidence as the central focal point, a good rebuttal relies on several elements to win an argument, including a clear presentation of the counterclaim, recognizing the inherent barrier standing in the way of the listener accepting the statement as truth, and presenting evidence clearly and concisely while remaining courteous and highly rational.

The evidence, as a result, must do the bulk work of proving the argument while the speaker should also preemptively defend certain erroneous attacks the opponent might make against it.

That is not to say that a rebuttal can't have an emotional element, as long as it works with evidence. A statistic about the number of people filing for bankruptcy per year due to medical debt can pair with a story of one such family as an example to support the topic of health care reform. It's both illustrative — a more personal way to talk about dry statistics — and an appeal to emotions.

To prepare an effective rebuttal, you need to know your opponent's position thoroughly to be able to formulate the proper attacks and to find evidence that dismantles the validity of that viewpoint. The first speaker will also anticipate your position and will try to make it look erroneous.

You will need to show:

• Contradictions in the first argument
• Terminology that's used in a way in order to sway opinion ( bias ) or used incorrectly. For example, when polls were taken about "Obamacare," people who didn't view the president favorably were more likely to want the policy defeated than when the actual name of it was presented as the Affordable Care Act.
• Errors in cause and effect
• Poor sources or misplaced authority
• Examples in the argument that are flawed or not comprehensive enough
• Flaws in the assumptions that the argument is based on
• Claims in the argument that are without proof or are widely accepted without actual proof. For example, alcoholism is defined by society as a disease. However, there isn't irrefutable medical proof that it is a disease like diabetes, for instance. Alcoholism manifests itself more like behavioral disorders, which are psychological.

The more points in the argument that you can dismantle, the more effective your rebuttal. Keep track of them as they're presented in the argument, and go after as many of them as you can.

Refutation Definition

The word rebuttal can be used interchangeably with refutation , which includes any contradictory statement in an argument. Strictly speaking, the distinction between the two is that a rebuttal must provide evidence, whereas a refutation merely relies on a contrary opinion. They differ in legal and argumentation contexts, wherein refutation involves any counterargument, while rebuttals rely on contradictory evidence to provide a means for a counterargument.

A successful refutation may disprove evidence with reasoning, but rebuttals must present evidence.

• the dozens (game of insults)
• Definition of Usage Labels and Notes in English Dictionaries
• Affect vs. Effect: How to Choose the Right Word
• What Is Aphesis?
• Definition and Examples of Praeteritio (Preteritio) in Rhetoric
• The Difference Between Portentous and Pretentious
• What Is a Compound Verb?
• Advisor vs. Adviser: How to Choose the Right Word
• Solecism in English
• The Difference Between "Leave" and "Let"
• The Commonly Confused Verbs Shall and Will
• Levels of Usage: Definition and Examples
• Defining Grammar
• Connote and Denote
• Gourmand and Gourmet

• Customer Reviews
• Extended Essays
• IB Internal Assessment
• Theory of Knowledge
• Literature Review
• Dissertations
• Essay Writing
• Research Writing
• Assignment Help
• Capstone Projects
• College Application
• Online Class

What is Rebuttal in an Argumentative Essay? (How to Write It)

by  Antony W

April 7, 2022

Even if you have the most convincing evidence and reasons to explain your position on an issue, there will still be people in your audience who will not agree with you.

Usually, this creates an opportunity for counterclaims, which requires a response through rebuttal. So what exactly is rebuttal in an argumentative essay?

A rebuttal in an argumentative essay is a response you give to your opponent’s argument to show that the position they currently hold on an issue is wrong. While you agree with their counterargument, you point out the flaws using the strongest piece of evidence to strengthen your position. 

To be clear, it’s hard to write an argument on an issue without considering counterclaim and rebuttals in the first place.

If you think about it, debatable topics require a consideration of both sides of an issue, which is why it’s important to learn about counterclaims and rebuttals in argumentative writing.

What is a Counterclaim in an Argument? 

To understand why rebuttal comes into play in an argumentative essay, you first have to know what a counterclaim is and why it’s important in writing.

A counterclaim is an argument that an opponent makes to weaken your thesis. In particular, counterarguments try to show why your argument’s claim is wrong and try to propose an alternative to what you stand for.

From a writing standpoint, you have to recognize the counterclaims presented by the opposing side.

In fact, argumentative writing requires you to look at the two sides of an issue even if you’ve already taken a strong stance on it.

There are a number of benefits of including counterarguments in your argumentative essay:

• It shows your instructor that you’ve looked into both sides of the argument and recognize that some readers may not share your views initially.
• You create an opportunity to provide a strong rebuttal to the counterclaims, so readers see them before they finish reading the essay.
• You end up strengthening your writing because the essay turns out more objective than it would without recognizing the counterclaims from the opposing side.

What is Rebuttal in Argumentative Essay? 

Your opponent will always look for weaknesses in your argument and try the best they can to show that you’re wrong.

Since you have solid grounds that your stance on an issue is reasonable, truthful, or more meaningful, you have to give a solid response to the opposition.

This is where rebuttal comes in.

In argumentative writing, rebuttal refers to the answer you give directly to an opponent in response to their counterargument. The answer should be a convincing explanation that shows an opponent why and/or how they’re wrong on an issue.

How to Write a Rebuttal Paragraph in Argumentative Essay

Now that you understand the connection between a counterclaim and rebuttal in an argumentative writing, let’s look at some approaches that you can use to refute your opponent’s arguments.

1. Point Out the Errors in the Counterargument

You’ve taken a stance on an issue for a reason, and mostly it’s because you believe yours is the most reasonable position based on the data, statistics, and the information you’ve collected.

Now that there’s a counterargument that tries to challenge your position, you can refute it by mentioning the flaws in it.

It’s best to analyze the counterargument carefully. Doing so will make it easy for you to identify the weaknesses, which you can point out and use the strongest points for rebuttal

2. Give New Points that Contradict the Counterclaims 

Imagine yourself in a hall full of debaters. On your left side is an audience that agrees with your arguable claim and on your left is a group of listeners who don’t buy into your argument.

Your opponents in the room are not holding back, especially because they’re constantly raising their hands to question your information.

To win them over in such a situation, you have to play smart by recognizing their stance on the issue but then explaining why they’re wrong.

Now, take a closer look at the structure of an argument . You’ll notice that it features a section for counterclaims, which means you have to address them if your essay must stand out. 

Here, it’s ideal to recognize and agree with the counterargument that the opposing side presents. Then, present a new point of view or facts that contradict the arguments.

Doing so will get the opposing side to consider your stance, even if they don’t agree with you entirely.

3. Twist Facts in Favor of Your Argument 

Sometimes the other side of the argument may make more sense than yours does. However, that doesn’t mean you have to concede entirely.

You can agree with the other side of the argument, but then twist facts and provide solid evidence to suit your argument.

This strategy can work for just about any topic, including the most complicated or controversial ones that you have never dealt with before.

4. Making an Emotional Plea 

Making an emotional plea isn’t a powerful rebuttal strategy, but it can also be a good option to consider.

It’s important to make sure that the emotional appeal you make outweighs the argument that your opponent brings forth.

Given that it’s often the least effective option in most arguments, making an emotional appeal should be a last resort if all the other options fail.

Final Thoughts 

As you can see, counterclaims are important in an argumentative essay and there’s more than one way to give your rebuttal.

Whichever approach you use, make sure you use the strongest facts, stats, evidence, or argument to prove that your position on an issue makes more sense that what your opponents currently hold.

Lastly, if you feel like your essay topic is complicated and you have only a few hours to complete the assignment, you can get in touch with Help for Assessment and we’ll point you in the right direction so you get your essay done right.

About the author 

Antony W is a professional writer and coach at Help for Assessment. He spends countless hours every day researching and writing great content filled with expert advice on how to write engaging essays, research papers, and assignments.

How to Write a Rebuttal Essay — An Easy Guide to Follow

Ever wondered how to write a rebuttal essay? Face this academic assignment for the first time and can’t find an understandable guide to follow? Don’t worry because here you’ll find a detailed guideline allowing you to set the record straight and understand what tips to follow while writing. We’ll take a look at all the aspects of writing, check what rebuttal in an essay is and list all tips to follow.

What Is a Rebuttal in an Essay — Simple Explanation

Academicians also call this form of writing a counter-argument essay. Its principal mission is to respond to some points made by a person. If you render a decision to answer one or another argument, you should present a rebuttal which is also known as a counter-argument. Otherwise stated, it is a simple attempt to disprove some statements by suggesting a counter-argument.

At a glance, this task seems to be quite challenging. However, rebuttal argument essay writing doesn’t take a massive amount of time. You just need to air your personal opinion on one or another situation.

Related essays:

• Economic recession essay
• Hamlet & formal structure
• The counter revolution and the 1960s essay
• Viacom Strategic Analysis essay

Nevertheless, your viewpoint should be based on your research and comprise a strong thesis statement. An excellent essay can even change the opinion of the intended audience. Thus, you need to be very attentive while writing and use only strong and double-checked arguments.

How to Do a Rebuttal in an Essay — Useful Tutorial

Firstly, you should conduct simple research before you start expressing your ideas. Don’t tend to procrastinate this task because it is tough to organize your thoughts when your deadline is dangerously close. If you don’t have a desire to spend the whole night poring over the books, it is better to start processing the literature as soon as possible. It would be great if you subdivide this task into a few sections. As a result, it will be easier to work!

The majority of academicians have not the slightest idea how to answer the question of how to start a rebuttal in an essay. In sober fact, you need to start with a strong introduction, comprising a thesis statement. Besides, your introductory part should explain what particular situation you are going to discuss. Your core audience should look it through and immediately understand what position you desire to explore.

You should create a list of claims and build your essay structure in the way allowing you to explain each claim one by one. Writing a rebuttal essay, you should follow a pre-written outline. As a result, you won’t face difficulties with the structure.

For instance, there is a particular situation, and you don’t agree with it. You wish to prove the targeted audience that your idea is correct. In this scenario, you need to state your opinion in a thesis statement and list all counter-arguments one by one.

Each rebuttal paragraph should be short and complete. Besides, you should avoid making too general statements because your targeted audience won’t understand what you mean. If you wish to air your proof-point, you should try to make more precise arguments. As a result, your readers won’t face difficulties trying to understand what you mean.

Rebuttal Essay Outline — Why Should You Create It

As well as any other academic paper, this one also should have a plan to follow. Your rebuttal essay outline is a sterling opportunity to organize your thoughts and create an approximate plan to follow. Commonly, your outline should look like this:

• Short but informative introduction with a thesis statement (just a few sentences).
• 3 or 5 body paragraphs presenting all counter-arguments.
• Strong conclusion where you should repeat your opinion once again.

For you not to forget some ideas, we highly recommend writing a list of all claims you wish to discuss in all paragraphs. Even if you are a seasoned writer who is engaged in this area and deals with creative assignments on a rolling basis, you won’t regret it. You’ll spend a few minutes creating the outline, but the general content of your essay will be considerably better.

Top-7 Rebuttal Essay Topics for Students

If you really can’t render a correct decision and pick a worthy topic, look through the rebuttal essay ideas published below. You can’t go wrong if you choose one of the below-listed ideas:

• Is it necessary to sentence juveniles to life imprisonment?
• Why are electro cars better for the environment?
• Distance learning is more effective than the traditional approach to education.
• Why should animal testing be forbidden?
• Modern drones can help police solve the crimes faster.
• Why should smoking marijuana be prohibited?
• Why should the screentime of kids be limited?

We hope our tips will help you catch the inspiration and create a compelling essay which will make your audience think of the discussed problem and even change their minds.

Definition of Rebuttal

Features of rebuttal, examples of rebuttal in literature, example #1: the founding foodies: how washington, jefferson, and franklin revolutionized american cuisine (by dave dewitt).

“A writer in your paper comforts himself, and the India Company, with the fancy that the Americans, should they resolve to drink no more tea, can by no means keep that resolution , their Indian corn not affording ‘an agreeable, or easy digestible breakfast .’ Pray let me, an American, inform the gentleman, who seems quite ignorant of the matter, that Indian corn, take it for all in all , is one of the most agreeable and wholesome grains in the world; that its green ears roasted are a delicacy beyond expression; that samp, hominy, succatash, and nokehock, made of it, are so many pleasing varieties; and that a johny, or hoe-cake, hot from the fire, is better than a Yorkshire muffin.”

Example #2: Fahrenheit 451 (By Ray Bradbury)

Example #3: editorial rebuttal in the washington post (by eugene joseph dionne), example #4: speech on 50th anniversary commemoration of bloody sunday in selma (by president barack obama).

“For we were born of change. We broke the old aristocracies, declaring ourselves entitled not by bloodline, but endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights. We secure our rights and responsibilities through a system of self-government, of and by and for the people. That’s why we argue and fight with so much passion and conviction, because we know our efforts matter. We know America is what we make of it.”

Function of Rebuttal

Post navigation.

• All Insights
• Top-Rated Articles
• How-to Guides
• For Parents

Rebutting Arguments: A Skill Every Debater Should Master

If you're a debater, no matter your experience level, you've probably heard of rebuttals. Although critical to a good debate, you may not know how the best rebuttals work or how to employ them on the field. In this article, we'll share some valuable insights to help you in your next round.

What Is a Rebuttal?

A rebuttal is a way to counter your opponent's arguments . You can disprove them, qualify them, or turn them against your opponent, whether to strengthen your own arguments or to weaken your opponent's case.

Rebuttals comprise one of three major parts of a typical debate: introduction, rebuttal, and summary. If you're interested in more complex debate structures, you might be interested in BP debate .

In an introduction, you give an overview of the case you are making, and in the summary, you recap your main ideas and analyze how the debate went. The rebuttal section, which we'll be focusing on, is where you provide additional evidence to support your case and address the arguments of your opponents .

The key to a good rebuttal is to have clear logic and reasoning behind your counterargument. You don't want to get caught up in attacking your opponent personally. That would be a classic example of the ad hominem fallacy !

Why Are Rebuttals Important?

Although you may not think of it this way, debate is a competitive sport. Rebuttals are your team's defensive moves .

In tennis, you can't just make offensive shots. You need to return your opponent's moves. After all, it wouldn't be a very fun sport if every point was simply determined by a single player's serve! What makes tennis engaging to watch and play is the way the ball moves back and forth over the net until one of the players misses or makes a mistake.

Think of rebuttals the same way. You want your rebuttal to be a shot your opponent misses, one that targets their weak spots, or one that forces them to make a move that leaves you an easy opening.

Before a debate, put yourself in your opponent's shoes. Think of what arguments they are likely to make . Then start looking for holes in their reasoning, evidence, or impact.

If that sounds hard, don't be afraid. Rebuttals may not be easy for every debater, but that's exactly why it's important to practice them. A good rebuttal can win a debate!

Types of Rebuttals in Debate

• Offensive Rebuttal: This rebuttal directly attacks your opponent's arguments, usually by challenging their logic or evidence. It can be the hardest to pull off, but can secure your victory!
• Defensive Rebuttal: This rebuttal defends yourself from the opponent's attacks, usually by providing explanations and clarifications as to why their arguments are wrong or irrelevant. Although it may not win you the debate, it will strengthen your case.
• Turning Rebuttal: This rebuttal does not aim to disprove your opponent's argument, but rather tries to show that their argument somehow supports your side of the debate.
• Counter Rebuttal : This rebuttal is a specific type of defensive response in which you address the points your opponents brought up during their opening statement with new information that refutes those claims, such as statistics or expert testimony.
• Closing Rebuttal : This rebuttal is your last chance to persuade your audience before they vote on who won the debate. Don't be afraid to pull out all your best emotive language and persuasive techniques !

Now let's take a look at the two most common types of rebuttals.

The Art of the Offensive Rebuttal

This classic rebuttal is a tool every debater should learn. It's an argument that you make to counter your opponent's main point and undermine their argument. The primary goal of this rebuttal is to show that the opponent is wrong . It can also serve to lower their credibility.

For this rebuttal to work, it should be based on your opponent's arguments and using the same kind of reasoning. Try out this simple structure for size:

• "Our opponents stated that..." Summarize your opponent's argument.
• "However, this is flawed because..." Explain their flaw in reasoning, evidence, or impact.
• "We say that..." Pose your counterargument and reinforce your case.
• "Therefore..." Therefore their argument is flawed and should not be considered in this debate.

The Art of the Defensive Rebuttal

This rebuttal is an opportunity for you to defend your position, but it can also be used to counter your opponent's arguments.

To use this strategy effectively, think about what their argument was and how they presented it. Did they make any claims? What were those claims? Most importantly, how were those claims wrong or misleading ?

In addition to defending yourself against your opponent's claims, keep an eye out for any logical fallacies your opponent may have tried to use against you. You can find a list of common fallacies here , with more guides on how to address them in debates.

How to Use the Opening Affirmative Point Effectively

The first affirmative point is a way to frame the debate's topic in a way that supports your case. By paying attention to it, you can get an idea of how your opponent may respond, which will help you figure out what rebuttals and counterarguments to make.

The first negative point should respond directly to this framing by either challenging it or building on it with another framing device, for instance "we still need X because Y." This will help set up your rebuttal by allowing you to show how your opponent's argument has failed based on the framing of their own arguments.

Rebuttals are an important part of debate, and they can be used in many different ways. The best way to learn how to use rebuttals effectively is to practice and experiment. If you're looking for an opportunity, LearningLeaders might just have the right program for you !

Related Insights

Christy flis on zoom's vision for the future of remote learning., free online learning event yes please., introduction to public speaking and debate (part ii).

• 5 Prep Tips for BP
• Top Speech Introductions
• Public Speaking and Debate Competitions
• Incorporating Humor
• Logical Fallacies
• How-To: Prepare for Debate Tournaments
• How-To: Judge a Debate
• How-To: Win a BP Debate
• How-To: Win An Argument
• How-To: Improve at Home
• Team China Wins World Championship
• Ariel Wins Tournament
• Jaxon Speaks Up
• Tina Improves

Home » Writers-House Blog » A Rebuttal: What It Is and How to Write One

A Rebuttal: What It Is and How to Write One

Students write thousands of essays in their academic career, and they often need to address counterarguments. However, what rebuttals are? Are they the same thing as counterarguments or should students approach them differently? Writers-house.com is here with some helpful tips.

First, a rebuttal isn’t a necessary part of an academic paper. A rebuttal is just a part of an argument. For example, when a student struggles to meet the word count, they can include a rebuttal that will both make the paper longer and strengthen the argument. Let’s consider rebuttals in more details so that everyone can figure out what a rebuttal should look like.

What Is a Rebuttal?

To understand the concept of a rebuttal, students should know how to include it in their argument. Therefore, it makes sense to consider arguments and counterarguments.

• The Argument The first part of the general argument is the author’s point. The author should have a strong opinion on an arguable topic, and the audience should be able to either agree or disagree with it.
• The Counterargument This is the opposing viewpoint. It’s what people who don’t agree with the author would say about the subject matter. The counterargument is also important because it makes the argument stronger, proving that the author has done their research and considered different opinions.
• The Rebuttal The rebuttal connects the argument and the counterargument, explaining why the former is correct and the latter is wrong. When writing a rebuttal, students can acknowledge the opposite opinion why also standing their ground.

For example, when choosing a restaurant, one may come up with an argument that a certain restaurant has great food and a nice atmosphere. A counterargument may state that the atmosphere isn’t good at all because the place is dark and the music is too loud. A possible rebuttal is that the dark atmosphere and loud music are not bad, and everything depends on a particular visitor’s preferences.

A rebuttal is a simple concept. First, the author presents their argument, then they address the counterargument, and then explain why they’re still right. Now let’s consider a rebuttal in an argumentative essay.

An Effective Rebuttal: Writing Strategies

An effective rebuttal shouldn’t just state that an argument is right and the counterargument is wrong. Academic writing requires students to use formal language and to create the right structure

1. Addressing the weaknesses of the counterargument

If a writer acknowledges the counterargument while also addressing its weaknesses, such an approach also helps to strengthen the argument. This way, the writer can demonstrate that they’ve studied the issue and considered different perspectives. Including a rebuttal allows for explaining why the argument is still valid and stronger than the counterargument.

2. Agreeing with the opposite opinion but providing additional information that weakens it

Sometimes, writers might partially agree with a counterargument, because the opposite opinion cannot be always wrong. In this case, the author should provide more information to explain why their point is still stronger, despite the validity of the counterargument. For example, there may be a piece of evidence that weakens the opposite point or illustrates very important exceptions.

Transitions and Their Importance

The argument, counterargument, and rebuttal should be connected so that the paper can be easy to comprehend. Transitions provide such connection, explaining how the author has switched from the argument to the counterargument to avoid possible confusion.

Transitions must help readers identify both the argument and counterargument, briefly explaining how the rebuttal supports the former and disproves or weakens the latter.

Final Thoughts

When writing an academic paper, one shouldn’t forget that both the counterargument and rebuttal should appear at the end of the paper. They must be followed by a strong conclusion that will help readers focus on the author’s point. It’s also important to check the required citation format and to make sure that all the sections of the paper are logically connected.

Leave a Reply

Be the First to Comment!

Place your order

• Essay Writer
• Essay Writing Service
• Term Paper Writing
• Research Paper Writing
• Assignment Writing Service
• Cover Letter Writing
• CV Writing Service
• Resume Writing Service
• 5-Paragraph Essays
• Paper By Subjects
• Affordable Papers
• Prime quality of each and every paper
• Everything written per your instructions
• Native-speaking expert writers
• 100% authenticity guaranteed
• Timely delivery
• Attentive 24/7 customer care team
• Benefits for return customers
• Affordable pricing

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

Organizing Your Argument

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

How can I effectively present my argument?

In order for your argument to be persuasive, it must use an organizational structure that the audience perceives as both logical and easy to parse. Three argumentative methods —the  Toulmin Method , Classical Method , and Rogerian Method — give guidance for how to organize the points in an argument.

Note that these are only three of the most popular models for organizing an argument. Alternatives exist. Be sure to consult your instructor and/or defer to your assignment’s directions if you’re unsure which to use (if any).

Toulmin Method

The  Toulmin Method  is a formula that allows writers to build a sturdy logical foundation for their arguments. First proposed by author Stephen Toulmin in  The Uses of Argument (1958), the Toulmin Method emphasizes building a thorough support structure for each of an argument's key claims.

The basic format for the Toulmin Method  is as follows:

Claim:  In this section, you explain your overall thesis on the subject. In other words, you make your main argument.

Data (Grounds):  You should use evidence to support the claim. In other words, provide the reader with facts that prove your argument is strong.

Warrant (Bridge):  In this section, you explain why or how your data supports the claim. As a result, the underlying assumption that you build your argument on is grounded in reason.

Backing (Foundation):  Here, you provide any additional logic or reasoning that may be necessary to support the warrant.

Counterclaim:  You should anticipate a counterclaim that negates the main points in your argument. Don't avoid arguments that oppose your own. Instead, become familiar with the opposing perspective.   If you respond to counterclaims, you appear unbiased (and, therefore, you earn the respect of your readers). You may even want to include several counterclaims to show that you have thoroughly researched the topic.

Rebuttal:  In this section, you incorporate your own evidence that disagrees with the counterclaim. It is essential to include a thorough warrant or bridge to strengthen your essay’s argument. If you present data to your audience without explaining how it supports your thesis, your readers may not make a connection between the two, or they may draw different conclusions.

Example of the Toulmin Method:

Claim:  Hybrid cars are an effective strategy to fight pollution.

Data1:  Driving a private car is a typical citizen's most air-polluting activity.

Warrant 1:  Due to the fact that cars are the largest source of private (as opposed to industrial) air pollution, switching to hybrid cars should have an impact on fighting pollution.

Data 2:  Each vehicle produced is going to stay on the road for roughly 12 to 15 years.

Warrant 2:  Cars generally have a long lifespan, meaning that the decision to switch to a hybrid car will make a long-term impact on pollution levels.

Data 3:  Hybrid cars combine a gasoline engine with a battery-powered electric motor.

Warrant 3:  The combination of these technologies produces less pollution.

Counterclaim:  Instead of focusing on cars, which still encourages an inefficient culture of driving even as it cuts down on pollution, the nation should focus on building and encouraging the use of mass transit systems.

Rebuttal:  While mass transit is an idea that should be encouraged, it is not feasible in many rural and suburban areas, or for people who must commute to work. Thus, hybrid cars are a better solution for much of the nation's population.

Rogerian Method

The Rogerian Method  (named for, but not developed by, influential American psychotherapist Carl R. Rogers) is a popular method for controversial issues. This strategy seeks to find a common ground between parties by making the audience understand perspectives that stretch beyond (or even run counter to) the writer’s position. Moreso than other methods, it places an emphasis on reiterating an opponent's argument to his or her satisfaction. The persuasive power of the Rogerian Method lies in its ability to define the terms of the argument in such a way that:

• your position seems like a reasonable compromise.
• you seem compassionate and empathetic.

The basic format of the Rogerian Method  is as follows:

Introduction:  Introduce the issue to the audience, striving to remain as objective as possible.

Opposing View : Explain the other side’s position in an unbiased way. When you discuss the counterargument without judgement, the opposing side can see how you do not directly dismiss perspectives which conflict with your stance.

Statement of Validity (Understanding):  This section discusses how you acknowledge how the other side’s points can be valid under certain circumstances. You identify how and why their perspective makes sense in a specific context, but still present your own argument.

Statement of Your Position:  By this point, you have demonstrated that you understand the other side’s viewpoint. In this section, you explain your own stance.

Statement of Contexts : Explore scenarios in which your position has merit. When you explain how your argument is most appropriate for certain contexts, the reader can recognize that you acknowledge the multiple ways to view the complex issue.

Statement of Benefits:  You should conclude by explaining to the opposing side why they would benefit from accepting your position. By explaining the advantages of your argument, you close on a positive note without completely dismissing the other side’s perspective.

Example of the Rogerian Method:

Introduction:  The issue of whether children should wear school uniforms is subject to some debate.

Opposing View:  Some parents think that requiring children to wear uniforms is best.

Statement of Validity (Understanding):  Those parents who support uniforms argue that, when all students wear the same uniform, the students can develop a unified sense of school pride and inclusiveness.

Statement of Your Position : Students should not be required to wear school uniforms. Mandatory uniforms would forbid choices that allow students to be creative and express themselves through clothing.

Statement of Contexts:  However, even if uniforms might hypothetically promote inclusivity, in most real-life contexts, administrators can use uniform policies to enforce conformity. Students should have the option to explore their identity through clothing without the fear of being ostracized.

Statement of Benefits:  Though both sides seek to promote students' best interests, students should not be required to wear school uniforms. By giving students freedom over their choice, students can explore their self-identity by choosing how to present themselves to their peers.

Classical Method

The Classical Method of structuring an argument is another common way to organize your points. Originally devised by the Greek philosopher Aristotle (and then later developed by Roman thinkers like Cicero and Quintilian), classical arguments tend to focus on issues of definition and the careful application of evidence. Thus, the underlying assumption of classical argumentation is that, when all parties understand the issue perfectly, the correct course of action will be clear.

The basic format of the Classical Method  is as follows:

Introduction (Exordium): Introduce the issue and explain its significance. You should also establish your credibility and the topic’s legitimacy.

Statement of Background (Narratio): Present vital contextual or historical information to the audience to further their understanding of the issue. By doing so, you provide the reader with a working knowledge about the topic independent of your own stance.

Proposition (Propositio): After you provide the reader with contextual knowledge, you are ready to state your claims which relate to the information you have provided previously. This section outlines your major points for the reader.

Proof (Confirmatio): You should explain your reasons and evidence to the reader. Be sure to thoroughly justify your reasons. In this section, if necessary, you can provide supplementary evidence and subpoints.

Refutation (Refuatio): In this section, you address anticipated counterarguments that disagree with your thesis. Though you acknowledge the other side’s perspective, it is important to prove why your stance is more logical.  

Conclusion (Peroratio): You should summarize your main points. The conclusion also caters to the reader’s emotions and values. The use of pathos here makes the reader more inclined to consider your argument.  

Example of the Classical Method:  

Introduction (Exordium): Millions of workers are paid a set hourly wage nationwide. The federal minimum wage is standardized to protect workers from being paid too little. Research points to many viewpoints on how much to pay these workers. Some families cannot afford to support their households on the current wages provided for performing a minimum wage job .

Statement of Background (Narratio): Currently, millions of American workers struggle to make ends meet on a minimum wage. This puts a strain on workers’ personal and professional lives. Some work multiple jobs to provide for their families.

Proposition (Propositio): The current federal minimum wage should be increased to better accommodate millions of overworked Americans. By raising the minimum wage, workers can spend more time cultivating their livelihoods.

Proof (Confirmatio): According to the United States Department of Labor, 80.4 million Americans work for an hourly wage, but nearly 1.3 million receive wages less than the federal minimum. The pay raise will alleviate the stress of these workers. Their lives would benefit from this raise because it affects multiple areas of their lives.

Refutation (Refuatio): There is some evidence that raising the federal wage might increase the cost of living. However, other evidence contradicts this or suggests that the increase would not be great. Additionally,   worries about a cost of living increase must be balanced with the benefits of providing necessary funds to millions of hardworking Americans.

Conclusion (Peroratio): If the federal minimum wage was raised, many workers could alleviate some of their financial burdens. As a result, their emotional wellbeing would improve overall. Though some argue that the cost of living could increase, the benefits outweigh the potential drawbacks.

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base
• How to write an argumentative essay | Examples & tips

How to Write an Argumentative Essay | Examples & Tips

Published on July 24, 2020 by Jack Caulfield . Revised on July 23, 2023.

An argumentative essay expresses an extended argument for a particular thesis statement . The author takes a clearly defined stance on their subject and builds up an evidence-based case for it.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

When do you write an argumentative essay, approaches to argumentative essays, introducing your argument, the body: developing your argument, concluding your argument, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about argumentative essays.

You might be assigned an argumentative essay as a writing exercise in high school or in a composition class. The prompt will often ask you to argue for one of two positions, and may include terms like “argue” or “argument.” It will frequently take the form of a question.

The prompt may also be more open-ended in terms of the possible arguments you could make.

Argumentative writing at college level

At university, the vast majority of essays or papers you write will involve some form of argumentation. For example, both rhetorical analysis and literary analysis essays involve making arguments about texts.

In this context, you won’t necessarily be told to write an argumentative essay—but making an evidence-based argument is an essential goal of most academic writing, and this should be your default approach unless you’re told otherwise.

Examples of argumentative essay prompts

At a university level, all the prompts below imply an argumentative essay as the appropriate response.

Your research should lead you to develop a specific position on the topic. The essay then argues for that position and aims to convince the reader by presenting your evidence, evaluation and analysis.

• Don’t just list all the effects you can think of.
• Do develop a focused argument about the overall effect and why it matters, backed up by evidence from sources.
• Don’t just provide a selection of data on the measures’ effectiveness.
• Do build up your own argument about which kinds of measures have been most or least effective, and why.
• Don’t just analyze a random selection of doppelgänger characters.
• Do form an argument about specific texts, comparing and contrasting how they express their thematic concerns through doppelgänger characters.

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

An argumentative essay should be objective in its approach; your arguments should rely on logic and evidence, not on exaggeration or appeals to emotion.

There are many possible approaches to argumentative essays, but there are two common models that can help you start outlining your arguments: The Toulmin model and the Rogerian model.

Toulmin arguments

The Toulmin model consists of four steps, which may be repeated as many times as necessary for the argument:

• Make a claim
• Provide the grounds (evidence) for the claim
• Explain the warrant (how the grounds support the claim)
• Discuss possible rebuttals to the claim, identifying the limits of the argument and showing that you have considered alternative perspectives

The Toulmin model is a common approach in academic essays. You don’t have to use these specific terms (grounds, warrants, rebuttals), but establishing a clear connection between your claims and the evidence supporting them is crucial in an argumentative essay.

Say you’re making an argument about the effectiveness of workplace anti-discrimination measures. You might:

• Claim that unconscious bias training does not have the desired results, and resources would be better spent on other approaches
• Cite data to support your claim
• Explain how the data indicates that the method is ineffective
• Anticipate objections to your claim based on other data, indicating whether these objections are valid, and if not, why not.

Rogerian arguments

The Rogerian model also consists of four steps you might repeat throughout your essay:

• Discuss what the opposing position gets right and why people might hold this position
• Highlight the problems with this position
• Present your own position , showing how it addresses these problems
• Suggest a possible compromise —what elements of your position would proponents of the opposing position benefit from adopting?

This model builds up a clear picture of both sides of an argument and seeks a compromise. It is particularly useful when people tend to disagree strongly on the issue discussed, allowing you to approach opposing arguments in good faith.

Say you want to argue that the internet has had a positive impact on education. You might:

• Acknowledge that students rely too much on websites like Wikipedia
• Argue that teachers view Wikipedia as more unreliable than it really is
• Suggest that Wikipedia’s system of citations can actually teach students about referencing
• Suggest critical engagement with Wikipedia as a possible assignment for teachers who are skeptical of its usefulness.

You don’t necessarily have to pick one of these models—you may even use elements of both in different parts of your essay—but it’s worth considering them if you struggle to structure your arguments.

Regardless of which approach you take, your essay should always be structured using an introduction , a body , and a conclusion .

Like other academic essays, an argumentative essay begins with an introduction . The introduction serves to capture the reader’s interest, provide background information, present your thesis statement , and (in longer essays) to summarize the structure of the body.

Hover over different parts of the example below to see how a typical introduction works.

The spread of the internet has had a world-changing effect, not least on the world of education. The use of the internet in academic contexts is on the rise, and its role in learning is hotly debated. For many teachers who did not grow up with this technology, its effects seem alarming and potentially harmful. This concern, while understandable, is misguided. The negatives of internet use are outweighed by its critical benefits for students and educators—as a uniquely comprehensive and accessible information source; a means of exposure to and engagement with different perspectives; and a highly flexible learning environment.

The body of an argumentative essay is where you develop your arguments in detail. Here you’ll present evidence, analysis, and reasoning to convince the reader that your thesis statement is true.

In the standard five-paragraph format for short essays, the body takes up three of your five paragraphs. In longer essays, it will be more paragraphs, and might be divided into sections with headings.

Each paragraph covers its own topic, introduced with a topic sentence . Each of these topics must contribute to your overall argument; don’t include irrelevant information.

This example paragraph takes a Rogerian approach: It first acknowledges the merits of the opposing position and then highlights problems with that position.

Hover over different parts of the example to see how a body paragraph is constructed.

A common frustration for teachers is students’ use of Wikipedia as a source in their writing. Its prevalence among students is not exaggerated; a survey found that the vast majority of the students surveyed used Wikipedia (Head & Eisenberg, 2010). An article in The Guardian stresses a common objection to its use: “a reliance on Wikipedia can discourage students from engaging with genuine academic writing” (Coomer, 2013). Teachers are clearly not mistaken in viewing Wikipedia usage as ubiquitous among their students; but the claim that it discourages engagement with academic sources requires further investigation. This point is treated as self-evident by many teachers, but Wikipedia itself explicitly encourages students to look into other sources. Its articles often provide references to academic publications and include warning notes where citations are missing; the site’s own guidelines for research make clear that it should be used as a starting point, emphasizing that users should always “read the references and check whether they really do support what the article says” (“Wikipedia:Researching with Wikipedia,” 2020). Indeed, for many students, Wikipedia is their first encounter with the concepts of citation and referencing. The use of Wikipedia therefore has a positive side that merits deeper consideration than it often receives.

An argumentative essay ends with a conclusion that summarizes and reflects on the arguments made in the body.

No new arguments or evidence appear here, but in longer essays you may discuss the strengths and weaknesses of your argument and suggest topics for future research. In all conclusions, you should stress the relevance and importance of your argument.

Hover over the following example to see the typical elements of a conclusion.

The internet has had a major positive impact on the world of education; occasional pitfalls aside, its value is evident in numerous applications. The future of teaching lies in the possibilities the internet opens up for communication, research, and interactivity. As the popularity of distance learning shows, students value the flexibility and accessibility offered by digital education, and educators should fully embrace these advantages. The internet’s dangers, real and imaginary, have been documented exhaustively by skeptics, but the internet is here to stay; it is time to focus seriously on its potential for good.

If you want to know more about AI tools , college essays , or fallacies make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples or go directly to our tools!

• Ad hominem fallacy
• Post hoc fallacy
• Appeal to authority fallacy
• False cause fallacy
• Sunk cost fallacy

College essays

• Choosing Essay Topic
• Write a College Essay
• Write a Diversity Essay
• College Essay Format & Structure
• Comparing and Contrasting in an Essay

 (AI) Tools

• Grammar Checker
• Paraphrasing Tool
• Text Summarizer
• AI Detector
• Plagiarism Checker
• Citation Generator

An argumentative essay tends to be a longer essay involving independent research, and aims to make an original argument about a topic. Its thesis statement makes a contentious claim that must be supported in an objective, evidence-based way.

An expository essay also aims to be objective, but it doesn’t have to make an original argument. Rather, it aims to explain something (e.g., a process or idea) in a clear, concise way. Expository essays are often shorter assignments and rely less on research.

At college level, you must properly cite your sources in all essays , research papers , and other academic texts (except exams and in-class exercises).

Add a citation whenever you quote , paraphrase , or summarize information or ideas from a source. You should also give full source details in a bibliography or reference list at the end of your text.

The exact format of your citations depends on which citation style you are instructed to use. The most common styles are APA , MLA , and Chicago .

The majority of the essays written at university are some sort of argumentative essay . Unless otherwise specified, you can assume that the goal of any essay you’re asked to write is argumentative: To convince the reader of your position using evidence and reasoning.

In composition classes you might be given assignments that specifically test your ability to write an argumentative essay. Look out for prompts including instructions like “argue,” “assess,” or “discuss” to see if this is the goal.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Caulfield, J. (2023, July 23). How to Write an Argumentative Essay | Examples & Tips. Scribbr. Retrieved September 3, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/academic-essay/argumentative-essay/

Is this article helpful?

Jack Caulfield

Other students also liked, how to write a thesis statement | 4 steps & examples, how to write topic sentences | 4 steps, examples & purpose, how to write an expository essay, get unlimited documents corrected.

✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts

• How to Cite
• Language & Lit
• Rhyme & Rhythm
• The Rewrite
• Search Glass

How to Write a Rebuttal Essay

A rebuttal essay, also known as an argument or counter-argument essay, typically responds to specific points made by a person or organization. As in a debate, this type of essay gives you the opportunity to present your opinions on a situation using research and critical thinking to address an argument. Understanding how to approach this type of essay will help you create a complete perspective which could impact another person’s point of view on the topic.

Outline Points

Before you begin writing, outline your argument to help prevent you from feeling stuck or uncertain about the next step in your essay. To begin, list the ideas made by the opposing view point. You should consider any length requirements for your essay, and if you have too many points, highlight the most important items you want to address. This list will provide a starting point for your research. When you have gathered the data you need on each point, decide on the order you will present them. One good option is to begin with the smallest idea on your list and build up to the most important or impactful idea.

Introductions

The introduction of your rebuttal essay should give some background to the situation you will discuss. This will help any reader unfamiliar with your topic have a starting point to understand your arguments. Once the reader has this information, you will give your thesis statement. Your introduction will not list each point you plan to make. Instead, your thesis will give your general stand on the argument in one sentence. For example, if your argument relates to one person’s opinion that a certain brand of soda tastes better than another, you will simply tell your reader that you have a different opinion. This sets up your paper and your stand on the topic.

Begin by sharing the first claim by the opposing view point. You will then state your ideas, and use your research to back up your opinion on this first claim. This will show the reader why she should stand with you on each particular point. Do not make generalized statements regarding the topic. Instead, stay on the point and then continue by following to the next idea listed on the outline you made before you began writing.

Once you cover each point, you will conclude your essay. This gives you the opportunity to pull all of your information together and show how each point you made should impact the reader’s opinion. You should restate your perspective on the topic, and end your essay with a final sentence that will leave the reader thinking about the subject and your perspective.

• Purdue Online Writing Lab: Rebuttal Sections
• The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: Argument

Kate Beck started writing for online publications in 2005. She worked as a certified ophthalmic technician for 10 years before returning to school to earn a Masters of Fine Arts degree in writing. Beck is currently putting the finishing touches on a novel.

• Skip to primary navigation
• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar
• Skip to footer

Dianna Radcliff

Teaching Upper Elementary & more

How to Teach Claims, Counterclaims and Rebuttals in Writing!

July 29, 2019 by Dianna Radcliff

Teaching claims, counterclaims and rebuttals in writing can improve a students opinion or argumentative essay.

This post will explain how I teach claims, counterclaims and rebuttals in writing.

To begin, let’s clarify the meaning of the following terms when giving instruction:

• Counterclaim

What is a Counterclaim?

A counterclaim is a claim used to rebut a previous claim.

A claim is the main argument. A counterclaim is the opposite of the claim, or argument.

What is a Rebuttal?

A rebuttal is when you address and challenge a claim by disapproving it.

After you have stated your counterclaim in an argument, you add your rebuttal to why you disapprove it. The goal is to weaken the main argument with your reasons and evidence.

What is a Reason?

A reason tells why a claim is made. Followed by supporting evidence.

What is Evidence?

Evidence is the facts or research to support the claim and reason.

Mini Lesson:

What to Prepare in advance:

• Download, print, cut, laminate and attach to sticks the FREE resource below.
• Write or type examples of a claim, counterclaim and rebuttal then cut up. This is for the acting out part. (see image below as an example)
• Find additional examples via student work pieces, articles or in texts to share and color code. You can share on another anchor chart, display on your SmartBoard or simply read aloud.

• Introduce the lesson by creating an anchor chart. (See below example or search online.)
• Using the colors in my example below, or your own colors, share examples from student pieces, articles or in texts you have found. You can share these examples on another anchor chart, display on your SmartBoard or simply read aloud.
• Using the stick bubbles in the FREE resource below, have 3 volunteers come up to demonstrate. Line students up in order and have them read their part holding up the stick bubble when speaking.

Anchor Chart Examples:

***Click on the Anchor Chart images to find more anchor charts you can use in your classroom!

Where to insert a Counterclaim?

When modeling, show students examples of inserting a counterclaim inside a body paragraph following reasons and evidence.

Where to insert a Rebuttal?

When modeling, show students examples of inserting a rebuttal following a counterclaim inside a body paragraph. Always use reasons and evidence.

Free Resource to Download:

More Helpful Essay Writing Resources:

• FREE Essay Planning Pages
• FREE Paragraph Writing Rubric
• FREE Paragraph Writing for an Essay Graphic Organizers (Color Coded)
• FREE Essay Writing Timing Slides
• Essay Writing Test Prep PowerPoint
• Essay Writing Sources and Prompts

***Click HERE or on the photo below to Download your FREE Resource! Simply print on colored paper (or cardstock) and then laminate!

Thank you for subscribing!

Share this:

How to Write a Rebuttal? (Mistakes to Avoid)

Whether or not you are familiar with the term, we can assure you that you make rebuttals all the time — indeed, it can be as simple as telling a friend that you shouldn’t go hiking this weekend, because you’re woefully underprepared and scared to get hurt, and then convincing them to check out that new museum, instead.

Writing a formal rebuttal, whether in an essay or another context, such as a letter to the editor or in preparation for a debate, is a little more challenging. With the right tools, however, you can rock your rebuttals. This in turns helps you be a more effective writer and a more skilled debater.

Understanding a Rebuttal

A rebuttal can succinctly be defined as “an argument that specifically addresses why an opponent’s viewpoint is wrong”. Rebuttals are not just used all the time in natural speech, but they also play a very important role in argumentative essays and debates.

Some of the most common settings in which rebuttals are used include:

• Debates , including in debate clubs and in politics. Once a participant finishes speaking, the opponent or opponents may be given the opportunity to refute certain arguments that were made, including (for example) ways in which the speaker mischaracterized an opposing viewpoint.
• Argumentative essays. Students are often asked to include counter arguments in their essays. These explain what arguments may be made, or have been made, against the claims being made in the essay. A rebuttal takes a counter argument to its conclusion, by explaining why the counter argument is not a valid one.
• In the media. When a well-known author publishes an opinion editorial, for instance, others may join by writing entire essays that argue against the views set forth in such op eds.
• In almost any other setting , from defense attorneys in court to citizens writing letters to the editor, to employees formally writing to protest against the results of a poor performance review. Such rebuttals may be verbal or in writing. Writing plenty of rebuttals helps you think on your feet if you’re ever called on to make a swift verbal rebuttal.

Rebuttals can broadly be divided into two distinct types — those aimed at someone who was directly addressing the writer or their viewpoints, or more academic rebuttals in which the author presents multiple viewpoints that originate with other thinkers, and refutes them.

While some rebuttals make appeals to emotion, successful rebuttals are articulated logically, respectfully, and clearly.

How to Write a Good Rebuttal: A Step-by-Step Guide

Written rebuttals can be important in many different settings, but most readers will be looking for ways to include counter arguments with rebuttals in argumentative essays. In this context, the essay author typically delves into common arguments against their thesis or any claim they make within their essay, and then explains why they believe those counter arguments to be ineffective.

How do you make a compelling case, without resorting to the cheap rhetorical tricks that may work well in a political debate but that are certain to cost you points in an academic setting? Being methodical is the key, and here’s a look at the steps you need to take to craft a convincing rebuttal.

• Analyze the Counter Argument (or Opposing Viewpoint)

To make a convincing rebuttal, first dissect the counter argument you are including in your essay to understand all parts of it. Do not simply read the opposing viewpoint and consider all the different ways in which you disagree with it and would like to argue against it, but also understand its component parts:

• Is the speaker or writer making argument you would like to refute appealing mainly to logos, pathos, or ethos?
• Who is the speaker’s intended audience?
• Is the speaker making use of any logical fallacies, such as ad hominem attacks?
• What message truly lies at the core of the opposing argument you are preparing to refute?
• Are there any points you agree with?

Once you understand precisely what the argument is, you will be in a stronger position to craft an effective rebuttal.

• Brainstorm What Rhetorical Strategies to Use in Your Rebuttal

Some arguments are strong, and contain a lot of points that you will have to agree with, or at least to respect. Others are so weak that it is hard to begin to decide from which angle it is best to attack them, because they are flawed from beginning to end. Now that you have taken the time to analyze the argument, you can begin thinking about the basis on which you want to write your rebuttal. Common examples include:

• The argument you are rebutting could contain factual errors, which you can then refute. The argument may also make vague claims that cannot be verified, in which case you can point that out as well. Point to verifiable sources.
• Refuting assumptions. The claim your opponent, or the viewpoint you are seeking to rebut, may present strong and factually-correct points, only to follow them up with assumptions that you deem to be incorrect or that do not logically flow from the facts presented. The philosopher Hobbes, for instance, argues that human nature is essentially selfish and humanity requires a strong ruler to prevent people from harming one another. Even if you agree with this view, you may refute the argument by arguing that the strong ruler Hobbes proposes is merely another brutal human.
• Analyzing the relevance of the counter argument. Should the opposing viewpoint argue that all pets should be permitted in an apartment complex because service animals are allowed, for instance, you could argue that service animals are unlike other pets, making the argument irrelevant.
• Gathering Additional Information

Once you have decided which parts of the opposing viewpoint are most problematic, you may need to do additional research. This should typically include fact-checking the opponent’s argument and gathering reliable information that disproves the argument.

• Write Your Rebuttal

Next, decide which parts of the rebuttal that is now already forming in your mind you would like to emphasize. Which points are the most important? Which do you really want to hammer in?

What is your goal? Would you like to seek common ground and convince people who previously held the opposing view? Would you like to shoot down the opposing viewpoint and have fun with being the most argumentative, polemic, version of yourself — often to rile up additional support among people who already agree with you? Are you writing an academic essay, and do you need to remain logical and emotionally detached?

The tone of your rebuttal will depend on all these factors. One winning formula you can turn to in any situation is, however, to:

• Summarize the opposing viewpoint in your own words. This demonstrates that you truly understand it.
• Point out aspects of the counter argument that you genuinely agree with, or that are objectively true. If you believe the opponent’s ultimate aims are admirable, you can say this, too.
• Explain why the counter argument or the argument you are going to refute is problematic, using evidence to back your argument up.
• Finally, you can return to your own argument, and explain why this is the better solution to the problem being discussed.

Common Mistakes to Avoid When Writing a Rebuttal

Do not fall into the common traps that make your rebuttal ineffective! The most common mistakes students make when including rebuttals in argumentative essays with counter claims include:

• Relying on logical fallacies to refute the counter argument. Make sure your argument is water-tight!
• Failing to transition into the rebuttal. This is why it is good to summarize the viewpoint and to point out aspects of it that you agree with prior to refuting the argument. Use words like “even though”, “despite the fact”, or “opponents often worry that” to ease the transition.
• Being too emotional. Present your case in a logical manner. Most of the time, you will be looking for a response that is more similar to “oh, indeed, that is a valid point!” than a “wow, that was intense”.
• Failing to fact-check your own rebuttal. Even if you are certain that a claim you make is correct, it is always best to double check.

How Does a Rebuttal Differ from a Counter Argument?

A counter argument simply examines an opposing view — one that is radically different from the thesis you are supporting in your essay. A rebuttal completes a counter argument by explaining why this argument is weak.

How Does a Rebuttal Differ from a Refutation?

Rebuttals and refutations are one and the same.

How Can I Present a Rebuttal in a Debate?

If you are participating in a debate, you will not have as much time to prepare to make a rebuttal, and will be called on to respond to your opponent in real time. Being familiar with the opponent’s views will give you time to research the kinds of arguments they will be making, and you can then prepare rebuttals in advance. You will, however, need to be able to think on your feet. Take a deep breath and try not to get emotional!

Related posts:

• How to Write a Counter Argument (Step-by-Step Guide)
• How to Write an Effective Counterclaim in 5 Steps
• 14 Tips to Help you Write An Essay Fast
• How to Write an Effective Claim (with Examples)
• How to Write a DBQ (APUSH) Essay?
• How To Write A Movie Title In An Essay

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

• EW Liaison Portal
• Academic Essay
• Analytical Art Essay
• Analytical Book Review
• Analytical Film Review
• Argumentative Essay
• Literature Reviews
• Project Report
• Reflective Essay
• Disciplinary Genres
• Useful Links

You are here

-->

• Planning the essay
• Sections of the essay
• Writing the introduction
• Writing body paragraphs
• Writing rebuttal paragraphs
• Additional resources

6. Writing rebuttal paragraphs

To strengthen the thesis statement, rebuttal paragraphs are written to argue against the points made on the opposing side. They usually come after your main arguments. When writing rebuttal paragraphs, make sure you have supporting evidence and maintain an objective, polite academic style. The following is a rebuttal paragraph by a writer who is against the increasing use of computers in the classroom.

It has been argued by those who support having online computers in class that students can gain more information from the vast learning resources on the Internet, and that they can benefit from it anytime at their convenience (Robinson & Chan, 2018; Smith, 2019). The Internet is indeed a vast resource of information, but as Wong (2019) points out, information is not the same as knowledge; and learning is more than receiving information. Real learning takes place when, after information, there comes formation and transformation of the knowledge in the mind. According to Wong and Miller (2020, p. 15), the fact that web pages can be downloaded immediately has deepened the culture of “instant noodles” among youngsters, resulting in the younger generation being increasingly impatient and dependent. They tend to forgo verifying the information they read and are unlikely to spend time synthesising ideas in order to come to their own conclusion. This suggests that increasing utilisation of computers in the classroom may lead to under-utilisation of the brain.

The argument to be refuted Rebuttal with support from sources Concluding sentence

For Writing Teachers

• Learn@PolyU
• EWR Consultation Booking
• Information Package for NEW Writing Teachers (Restricted Access)
• Useful materials

For CAR Teachers

• Writing Requirement Information
• Reading Requirement Information

About this website

This website is an open access website to share our English Writing Requirement (General Education) writing support materials to support these courses

• to support PolyU students’ literacy development within and across the disciplines
• to support subject and language teachers to implement system-level measures for integrating literacy-sensitive pedagogies across the university

This platform provides access to generic genre guides representing typical university assignments as well as links to subjects offered by faculties with specific disciplinary genres and relevant support materials.

The materials can be retrieved by students by choosing the genres that interest them on the landing page. Each set of materials includes a genre guide, genre video, and a genre checklist. The genre guide and video are to summarize the genres in two different ways (i.e. textual and dynamic) to fit different learning styles. The genre checklist is for students to self-regulate their writing process. The genre guide and checklist include links to various ELC resources that can provide further explanation to language items (e.g. hedging and academic vocabulary).

The platform also acts as a one-stop-shop for writing resources for students, language teachers and subject leaders. Information about the English Writing Requirement policy can also be found on this platform. There are training materials for new colleagues joining the EWR Liaison Team.

How to Write an Essay Outline: Examples, FAQs & Tips

An essay outline is a structured plan that organizes the main points and supporting details of an essay before writing. It guides the flow of ideas and ensures that each section of the essay is logically connected and coherent.

In this article, we'll walk you through the steps to build a strong essay outline. You'll discover how to define your thesis, arrange your main points, and structure your outline for clarity and effectiveness. If you're still having trouble putting your outline together after reading this, EssayService can provide expert help to make sure your essay is well-structured and persuasive!

Basic Elements of an Essay

An essay begins with an introduction, which is followed by one or more body paragraphs that expand on the points introduced. It ends with a conclusion that restates the thesis and summarizes the main ideas from the body paragraphs.

Introduction

The introduction of an essay introduces the topic and engages the reader from the start. It usually starts with a hook—a statement or question that grabs attention. After the hook, some background information is given to provide context for the topic.

The introduction ends with a thesis statement, which clearly presents the main argument or purpose of the essay. This section not only introduces the topic but also outlines what the essay will cover, setting the tone for what follows.

Avoid these pitfalls:

• Don't try to cover too much ground in your introduction.
• Avoid vagueness. Be specific and precise in your language.

Body Paragraphs

The body of the essay is where your main ideas and arguments take shape. Each paragraph should open with a topic sentence that clearly states the main point. This is followed by supporting details like evidence, examples, and analysis that back up the topic sentence.

Smooth transitions between paragraphs are key to maintaining a logical flow throughout the essay. Together, the body paragraphs build and support the thesis by adding depth and detail to your argument.

Remember these tips for effective body paragraphs:

• Begin each paragraph with a clear and concise topic sentence.
• Use specific examples, facts, or quotes to support your point.
• Explain why the evidence is important and how it relates to your argument.

The conclusion of an essay wraps up the argument and reinforces the thesis. It usually starts by restating the thesis and reflecting on the discussion and evidence presented in the body paragraphs. A brief summary of the main points follows, highlighting the key arguments made throughout the essay.

The conclusion should close with a final thought or call to action, leaving the reader with something to think about or a sense of closure. The aim is to make a lasting impression that emphasizes the importance of the essay's conclusions.

Remember these tips:

• Briefly recap the key arguments you've made.
• Leave the reader with a thought-provoking final sentence or a call to action.
• Don't introduce any new ideas or arguments in your conclusion.

How to Write an Essay Outline?

Now, let's dive into the heart of this article and show you how to write an essay outline in just four smart steps:

• Determining your thesis and key arguments
• Organizing points into sections
• Adding supporting details
• Drafting a rough outline

Determine Your Thesis and Key Arguments

Your thesis should present a specific point of view or a central idea that your essay will support or explore. Here's how to identify your thesis:

• Ask a question: What is the main point you want to convey?
• Brainstorm: Jot down ideas related to your topic.
• Refine your ideas: Narrow down your focus and develop a clear argument.

Once you have your thesis, identify the main points that support it. These points should be logical, relevant, and comprehensive.

• Divide your thesis: Break down your thesis into its key components.
• Create a mind map: Visually organize your ideas.
• Ask yourself questions: What are the main reasons for your argument? What evidence supports your claims?

Group Main Ideas into Sections

The best way to organize your main points when writing an essay outline depends on the specific topic and purpose of your essay. Experiment with different arrangements to find the one that works best for you. Here are some strategies for organizing your main points:

	Use this when	Example
Chronological Order	Your essay is about a sequence of events or a process.	An essay about the history of the French Revolution could be organized chronologically, starting with the causes and ending with the aftermath.
Spatial Order	Your essay is describing a physical space or object.	An essay about the architecture of the Colosseum could be organized spatially, moving from the exterior to the interior.
Order of Importance	Your main points vary in significance.	An essay arguing for stricter gun control laws might begin with the most compelling argument and end with the least compelling.
Compare and Contrast Order	Your essay examines similarities and differences between two or more things.	An essay comparing the philosophies of Plato and Aristotle could be organized by alternating between points of similarity and difference.

Add Details to Each Main Idea

When working on your essay outline, remember to choose supporting details that are relevant, specific, and convincing. The more evidence you can provide, the stronger your arguments will be. Consider these tips for developing supporting details for each one.

• Provide examples: "For example, the Great Depression led to a significant increase in homelessness and poverty."
• Cite expert opinions: "As the renowned historian, Eric Hobsbawm, once said, 'The French Revolution was a watershed moment in European history.'"
• Make comparisons and contrasts: "While both cats and dogs make excellent pets, cats are generally more independent, while dogs are more social."
• Offer definitions: "A democracy is a form of government in which the people have the power to elect their leaders."

Make a Rough Outline

Once you've developed supporting details for each main point, you're ready to create a draft outline. This outline will serve as a roadmap for your essay, guiding you through the writing process.

Here's a basic outline template:

• Background information
• Thesis statement

Body Paragraph 1

• Topic sentence
• Supporting detail 1
• Supporting detail 2
• Supporting detail 3

Body Paragraph 2

Body Paragraph 3

• Restate thesis
• Summarize key points
• Final thought

Remember to:

• Use consistent formatting: Indent supporting details.
• Label sections clearly: Use Roman numerals for main points and letters for supporting details.
• Be flexible: Adjust your outline as needed to accommodate new ideas or changes in your argument.

Essay Outline Examples

Now that you have an understanding of the basic structure of an essay outline let's explore some specific examples tailored to different essay genres. Remember, these are just templates, and you should feel free to adapt each essay outline example to fit your unique needs and writing style.

Argumentative Essay Outline

I. Introduction

• Hook: A captivating opening sentence to grab the reader's attention.
• Background information: Relevant context to the topic.
• Thesis statement: A clear and concise statement of your argument.

II. Body Paragraph 1

• Topic sentence: The main point of this paragraph.
• Supporting evidence: Facts, statistics, examples, or expert opinions to support your argument.
• Explanation: Analysis of the evidence and its relevance to your thesis.

III. Body Paragraph 2

• Topic sentence: The second main point of your argument.
• Supporting evidence: Facts, statistics, examples, or expert opinions.

IV. Body Paragraph 3

• Topic sentence: The third main point of your argument.

V. Counterargument

• Acknowledge opposing viewpoint: Briefly mention a counterargument.
• Refute counterargument: Provide evidence or reasoning to disprove the opposing viewpoint.

VI. Conclusion

• Restate thesis: Reiterate your main argument.
• Summarize key points: Briefly recap the main supporting points.
• Final thought: Leave the reader with a memorable and impactful statement.

Expository Essay Outline

• A. Hook: Start with an engaging statement or fact to grab the reader's attention.
• B. Background Information: Provide context or background information necessary for understanding the topic.
• C. Thesis Statement: Clearly state the main point or purpose of the essay.
• A. Topic Sentence: Introduce the main idea of the paragraph.
• B. Explanation/Detail: Provide a detailed explanation or description of the first point.
• C. Evidence/Example: Include evidence or examples to support the explanation.
• D. Analysis: Explain how the evidence or example supports the topic sentence.
• B. Explanation/Detail: Provide a detailed explanation or description of the second point.
• B. Explanation/Detail: Provide a detailed explanation or description of the third point.

V. Conclusion

• A. Restate Thesis: Restate the thesis in a new way, summarizing the main points of the essay.
• B. Summary of Main Points: Briefly summarize the key points discussed in the body paragraphs.
• C. Final Thought: End with a concluding statement that reinforces the significance of the topic or provides a closing thought.

Persuasive Essays Outline

• Background information: Provide context or history related to your topic.
• Thesis statement: Clearly state your argument or position.
• Main argument: Present your strongest argument in support of your thesis.
• Supporting evidence: Use facts, statistics, examples, or expert opinions to back up your argument.
• Counterargument: Briefly acknowledge an opposing viewpoint.
• Rebuttal: Refute the counterargument with evidence or reasoning.
• Main argument: Present your second strongest argument in support of your thesis.
• Main argument: Present your third strongest argument in support of your thesis.
• Restate thesis: Briefly rephrase your argument.
• Summarize key points: Recap the main supporting arguments.
• Call to action: Encourage the reader to take a specific action or adopt a particular viewpoint.

Final Words

As we sum up this article, let's recap the main steps for writing an outline:

• Determine the main argument or purpose of your essay.
• Break down your thesis into key ideas or arguments.
• Group related ideas together under clear headings.
• Include evidence, examples, and explanations for each main point.
• Arrange everything in a logical order, ensuring a smooth flow from one section to the next.

To ensure your writing is well-structured and effective, rely on EssayService, which is here to help with any type of essay.

Frequently asked questions

• Linford, J. (2014). Essay Planning: Outlining with a Purpose What Is an Outline? How Do I Develop an Outline? https://www.sjsu.edu/writingcenter/docs/handouts/Essay%20Planning%20-%20Outlining.pdf
• ‌ Writing an Outline for your essay | MacOdrum Library . (n.d.). Library.carleton.ca . https://library.carleton.ca/guides/help/writing-outline-your-essay

She was flawless! first time using a website like this, I've ordered article review and i totally adored it! grammar punctuation, content - everything was on point

This writer is my go to, because whenever I need someone who I can trust my task to - I hire Joy. She wrote almost every paper for me for the last 2 years

Term paper done up to a highest standard, no revisions, perfect communication. 10s across the board!!!!!!!

I send him instructions and that's it. my paper was done 10 hours later, no stupid questions, he nailed it.

Sometimes I wonder if Michael is secretly a professor because he literally knows everything. HE DID SO WELL THAT MY PROF SHOWED MY PAPER AS AN EXAMPLE. unbelievable, many thanks

New posts to your inbox!

Stay in touch

Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World

Read our research on:

Full Topic List

Regions & Countries

• Publications
• Our Methods
• Short Reads
• Tools & Resources

Read Our Research On:

Key things to know about U.S. election polling in 2024

Confidence in U.S. public opinion polling was shaken by errors in 2016 and 2020. In both years’ general elections, many polls underestimated the strength of Republican candidates, including Donald Trump. These errors laid bare some real limitations of polling.

In the midterms that followed those elections, polling performed better . But many Americans remain skeptical that it can paint an accurate portrait of the public’s political preferences.

Restoring people’s confidence in polling is an important goal, because robust and independent public polling has a critical role to play in a democratic society. It gathers and publishes information about the well-being of the public and about citizens’ views on major issues. And it provides an important counterweight to people in power, or those seeking power, when they make claims about “what the people want.”

The challenges facing polling are undeniable. In addition to the longstanding issues of rising nonresponse and cost, summer 2024 brought extraordinary events that transformed the presidential race . The good news is that people with deep knowledge of polling are working hard to fix the problems exposed in 2016 and 2020, experimenting with more data sources and interview approaches than ever before. Still, polls are more useful to the public if people have realistic expectations about what surveys can do well – and what they cannot.

With that in mind, here are some key points to know about polling heading into this year’s presidential election.

Probability sampling (or “random sampling”). This refers to a polling method in which survey participants are recruited using random sampling from a database or list that includes nearly everyone in the population. The pollster selects the sample. The survey is not open for anyone who wants to sign up.

Online opt-in polling (or “nonprobability sampling”). These polls are recruited using a variety of methods that are sometimes referred to as “convenience sampling.” Respondents come from a variety of online sources such as ads on social media or search engines, websites offering rewards in exchange for survey participation, or self-enrollment. Unlike surveys with probability samples, people can volunteer to participate in opt-in surveys.

Nonresponse and nonresponse bias. Nonresponse is when someone sampled for a survey does not participate. Nonresponse bias occurs when the pattern of nonresponse leads to error in a poll estimate. For example, college graduates are more likely than those without a degree to participate in surveys, leading to the potential that the share of college graduates in the resulting sample will be too high.

Mode of interview. This refers to the format in which respondents are presented with and respond to survey questions. The most common modes are online, live telephone, text message and paper. Some polls use more than one mode.

Weighting. This is a statistical procedure pollsters perform to make their survey align with the broader population on key characteristics like age, race, etc. For example, if a survey has too many college graduates compared with their share in the population, people without a college degree are “weighted up” to match the proper share.

How are election polls being conducted?

Pollsters are making changes in response to the problems in previous elections. As a result, polling is different today than in 2016. Most U.S. polling organizations that conducted and publicly released national surveys in both 2016 and 2022 (61%) used methods in 2022 that differed from what they used in 2016 . And change has continued since 2022.

One change is that the number of active polling organizations has grown significantly, indicating that there are fewer barriers to entry into the polling field. The number of organizations that conduct national election polls more than doubled between 2000 and 2022.

This growth has been driven largely by pollsters using inexpensive opt-in sampling methods. But previous Pew Research Center analyses have demonstrated how surveys that use nonprobability sampling may have errors twice as large , on average, as those that use probability sampling.

The second change is that many of the more prominent polling organizations that use probability sampling – including Pew Research Center – have shifted from conducting polls primarily by telephone to using online methods, or some combination of online, mail and telephone. The result is that polling methodologies are far more diverse now than in the past.

(For more about how public opinion polling works, including a chapter on election polls, read our short online course on public opinion polling basics .)

All good polling relies on statistical adjustment called “weighting,” which makes sure that the survey sample aligns with the broader population on key characteristics. Historically, public opinion researchers have adjusted their data using a core set of demographic variables to correct imbalances between the survey sample and the population.

But there is a growing realization among survey researchers that weighting a poll on just a few variables like age, race and gender is insufficient for getting accurate results. Some groups of people – such as older adults and college graduates – are more likely to take surveys, which can lead to errors that are too sizable for a simple three- or four-variable adjustment to work well. Adjusting on more variables produces more accurate results, according to Center studies in 2016 and 2018 .

A number of pollsters have taken this lesson to heart. For example, recent high-quality polls by Gallup and The New York Times/Siena College adjusted on eight and 12 variables, respectively. Our own polls typically adjust on 12 variables . In a perfect world, it wouldn’t be necessary to have that much intervention by the pollster. But the real world of survey research is not perfect.

Predicting who will vote is critical – and difficult. Preelection polls face one crucial challenge that routine opinion polls do not: determining who of the people surveyed will actually cast a ballot.

Roughly a third of eligible Americans do not vote in presidential elections , despite the enormous attention paid to these contests. Determining who will abstain is difficult because people can’t perfectly predict their future behavior – and because many people feel social pressure to say they’ll vote even if it’s unlikely.

No one knows the profile of voters ahead of Election Day. We can’t know for sure whether young people will turn out in greater numbers than usual, or whether key racial or ethnic groups will do so. This means pollsters are left to make educated guesses about turnout, often using a mix of historical data and current measures of voting enthusiasm. This is very different from routine opinion polls, which mostly do not ask about people’s future intentions.

When major news breaks, a poll’s timing can matter. Public opinion on most issues is remarkably stable, so you don’t necessarily need a recent poll about an issue to get a sense of what people think about it. But dramatic events can and do change public opinion , especially when people are first learning about a new topic. For example, polls this summer saw notable changes in voter attitudes following Joe Biden’s withdrawal from the presidential race. Polls taken immediately after a major event may pick up a shift in public opinion, but those shifts are sometimes short-lived. Polls fielded weeks or months later are what allow us to see whether an event has had a long-term impact on the public’s psyche.

How accurate are polls?

The answer to this question depends on what you want polls to do. Polls are used for all kinds of purposes in addition to showing who’s ahead and who’s behind in a campaign. Fair or not, however, the accuracy of election polling is usually judged by how closely the polls matched the outcome of the election.

By this standard, polling in 2016 and 2020 performed poorly. In both years, state polling was characterized by serious errors. National polling did reasonably well in 2016 but faltered in 2020.

In 2020, a post-election review of polling by the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) found that “the 2020 polls featured polling error of an unusual magnitude: It was the highest in 40 years for the national popular vote and the highest in at least 20 years for state-level estimates of the vote in presidential, senatorial, and gubernatorial contests.”

How big were the errors? Polls conducted in the last two weeks before the election suggested that Biden’s margin over Trump was nearly twice as large as it ended up being in the final national vote tally.

Errors of this size make it difficult to be confident about who is leading if the election is closely contested, as many U.S. elections are .

Pollsters are rightly working to improve the accuracy of their polls. But even an error of 4 or 5 percentage points isn’t too concerning if the purpose of the poll is to describe whether the public has favorable or unfavorable opinions about candidates , or to show which issues matter to which voters. And on questions that gauge where people stand on issues, we usually want to know broadly where the public stands. We don’t necessarily need to know the precise share of Americans who say, for example, that climate change is mostly caused by human activity. Even judged by its performance in recent elections, polling can still provide a faithful picture of public sentiment on the important issues of the day.

The 2022 midterms saw generally accurate polling, despite a wave of partisan polls predicting a broad Republican victory. In fact, FiveThirtyEight found that “polls were more accurate in 2022 than in any cycle since at least 1998, with almost no bias toward either party.” Moreover, a handful of contrarian polls that predicted a 2022 “red wave” largely washed out when the votes were tallied. In sum, if we focus on polling in the most recent national election, there’s plenty of reason to be encouraged.

Compared with other elections in the past 20 years, polls have been less accurate when Donald Trump is on the ballot. Preelection surveys suffered from large errors – especially at the state level – in 2016 and 2020, when Trump was standing for election. But they performed reasonably well in the 2018 and 2022 midterms, when he was not.

During the 2016 campaign, observers speculated about the possibility that Trump supporters might be less willing to express their support to a pollster – a phenomenon sometimes described as the “shy Trump effect.” But a committee of polling experts evaluated five different tests of the “shy Trump” theory and turned up little to no evidence for each one . Later, Pew Research Center and, in a separate test, a researcher from Yale also found little to no evidence in support of the claim.

Instead, two other explanations are more likely. One is about the difficulty of estimating who will turn out to vote. Research has found that Trump is popular among people who tend to sit out midterms but turn out for him in presidential election years. Since pollsters often use past turnout to predict who will vote, it can be difficult to anticipate when irregular voters will actually show up.

The other explanation is that Republicans in the Trump era have become a little less likely than Democrats to participate in polls . Pollsters call this “partisan nonresponse bias.” Surprisingly, polls historically have not shown any particular pattern of favoring one side or the other. The errors that favored Democratic candidates in the past eight years may be a result of the growth of political polarization, along with declining trust among conservatives in news organizations and other institutions that conduct polls.

Whatever the cause, the fact that Trump is again the nominee of the Republican Party means that pollsters must be especially careful to make sure all segments of the population are properly represented in surveys.

The real margin of error is often about double the one reported. A typical election poll sample of about 1,000 people has a margin of sampling error that’s about plus or minus 3 percentage points. That number expresses the uncertainty that results from taking a sample of the population rather than interviewing everyone . Random samples are likely to differ a little from the population just by chance, in the same way that the quality of your hand in a card game varies from one deal to the next.

The problem is that sampling error is not the only kind of error that affects a poll. Those other kinds of error, in fact, can be as large or larger than sampling error. Consequently, the reported margin of error can lead people to think that polls are more accurate than they really are.

There are three other, equally important sources of error in polling: noncoverage error , where not all the target population has a chance of being sampled; nonresponse error, where certain groups of people may be less likely to participate; and measurement error, where people may not properly understand the questions or misreport their opinions. Not only does the margin of error fail to account for those other sources of potential error, putting a number only on sampling error implies to the public that other kinds of error do not exist.

Several recent studies show that the average total error in a poll estimate may be closer to twice as large as that implied by a typical margin of sampling error. This hidden error underscores the fact that polls may not be precise enough to call the winner in a close election.

Other important things to remember

Transparency in how a poll was conducted is associated with better accuracy . The polling industry has several platforms and initiatives aimed at promoting transparency in survey methodology. These include AAPOR’s transparency initiative and the Roper Center archive . Polling organizations that participate in these organizations have less error, on average, than those that don’t participate, an analysis by FiveThirtyEight found .

Participation in these transparency efforts does not guarantee that a poll is rigorous, but it is undoubtedly a positive signal. Transparency in polling means disclosing essential information, including the poll’s sponsor, the data collection firm, where and how participants were selected, modes of interview, field dates, sample size, question wording, and weighting procedures.

There is evidence that when the public is told that a candidate is extremely likely to win, some people may be less likely to vote . Following the 2016 election, many people wondered whether the pervasive forecasts that seemed to all but guarantee a Hillary Clinton victory – two modelers put her chances at 99% – led some would-be voters to conclude that the race was effectively over and that their vote would not make a difference. There is scientific research to back up that claim: A team of researchers found experimental evidence that when people have high confidence that one candidate will win, they are less likely to vote. This helps explain why some polling analysts say elections should be covered using traditional polling estimates and margins of error rather than speculative win probabilities (also known as “probabilistic forecasts”).

National polls tell us what the entire public thinks about the presidential candidates, but the outcome of the election is determined state by state in the Electoral College . The 2000 and 2016 presidential elections demonstrated a difficult truth: The candidate with the largest share of support among all voters in the United States sometimes loses the election. In those two elections, the national popular vote winners (Al Gore and Hillary Clinton) lost the election in the Electoral College (to George W. Bush and Donald Trump). In recent years, analysts have shown that Republican candidates do somewhat better in the Electoral College than in the popular vote because every state gets three electoral votes regardless of population – and many less-populated states are rural and more Republican.

For some, this raises the question: What is the use of national polls if they don’t tell us who is likely to win the presidency? In fact, national polls try to gauge the opinions of all Americans, regardless of whether they live in a battleground state like Pennsylvania, a reliably red state like Idaho or a reliably blue state like Rhode Island. In short, national polls tell us what the entire citizenry is thinking. Polls that focus only on the competitive states run the risk of giving too little attention to the needs and views of the vast majority of Americans who live in uncompetitive states – about 80%.

Fortunately, this is not how most pollsters view the world . As the noted political scientist Sidney Verba explained, “Surveys produce just what democracy is supposed to produce – equal representation of all citizens.”

• Survey Methods
• Trust, Facts & Democracy
• Voter Files

Scott Keeter is a senior survey advisor at Pew Research Center .

Courtney Kennedy is Vice President of Methods and Innovation at Pew Research Center .

How do people in the U.S. take Pew Research Center surveys, anyway?

How public polling has changed in the 21st century, what 2020’s election poll errors tell us about the accuracy of issue polling, a field guide to polling: election 2020 edition, methods 101: how is polling done around the world, most popular.

901 E St. NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20004 USA (+1) 202-419-4300 | Main (+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax (+1) 202-419-4372 |  Media Inquiries

Research Topics

• Email Newsletters

ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER  Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of  The Pew Charitable Trusts .

© 2024 Pew Research Center

• Share full article

Advertisement

Supported by

Guest Essay

Republican Donors, Do You Know Where Your Money Goes?

By Juleanna Glover

Juleanna Glover is the chief executive of Ridgely Walsh, a corporate consultancy, and a former adviser to many Republican officials.

We long ago blew past any meaningful controls on political giving in American elections. Now we should focus on the rules governing political spending, which are in equally terrible shape. For that we can blame the Trump campaign and the federal government’s feeble enforcement efforts.

Anyone who has spent time reviewing Donald Trump’s campaign spending reports would quickly conclude they’re a governance nightmare. There is so little disclosure about what happened to the billions raised in 2020 and 2024 that donors (and maybe even the former president himself) can’t possibly know how it was spent.

Federal Election Commission campaign disclosure reports from 2020 show that much of the money donated to the Trump campaign went into a legal and financial black hole reportedly controlled by Trump family members and close associates. This year’s campaign disclosures are shaping up to be the same. Donors big and small give their hard-earned dollars to candidates with the expectation they will be spent on direct efforts to win votes. They deserve better.

During the 2020 election, almost $516 million of the over $780 million spent by the Trump campaign was directed to American Made Media Consultants, a Delaware-based private company created in 2018 that masked the identities of who ultimately received donor dollars, according to a complaint filed with the F.E.C. by the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center . How A.M.M.C. spent the money was a mystery even to Mr. Trump’s campaign team , according to news reports shortly after the election.

All but 18 of the 150 largest expenditures on a Trump campaign’s 2020 F.E.C. report went to A.M.M.C. None of the expenses were itemized or otherwise explained aside from anodyne descriptions including “placed media,” “SMS advertising” and “online advertising.” F.E.C. rules require candidates to fully and accurately disclose the final recipients of their campaign disbursements, which is usually understood to include when payments are made through a vendor such as A.M.M.C. This disclosure is intended to assure donors their contributions are used for campaign expenses. Currently, neither voters nor law enforcement can know whether any laws were broken.

A.M.M.C.’s first president was reported to be Lara Trump , the wife of Mr. Trump’s son Eric. The New York Times reported that A.M.M.C. had a treasurer who was also the chief financial officer of Mr. Trump’s 2020 presidential campaign. Mr. Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner signed off on the plan to set up A.M.M.C., and one of Eric Trump’s deputies from the Trump Organization was involved in running it.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and  log into  your Times account, or  subscribe  for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber?  Log in .

Want all of The Times?  Subscribe .