how to link proposals in research.gov

NSF’s Research.gov Expanded: Separately Submitted Collaborative Proposals from Multiple Organizations Now Available

Dear Colleagues:

We are excited to announce that effective March 30, 2020, the research community can prepare and submit separately submitted collaborative proposals from multiple organizations in Research.gov. Proposers can now prepare Full, Research proposals in Research.gov that are:

• Single submissions from one organization (available since April 2018)
• Single submission collaborative proposals with subawards (available since June 2019)
• Separately submitted collaborative proposals from multiple organizations

What’s New for Separately Submitted Collaborative Proposals?

• Proposal Preparation : Proposers can select a separately submitted collaborative proposal as an option in the Proposal Creation Wizard and identify themselves as part of a lead or non-lead organization.
• Linking: The lead organization can initiate a request to link proposals with non-lead organizations. However, all proposals in the collaboration must be prepared and submitted in Research.gov and cannot be a mix of Research.gov and FastLane proposals.
• A new Research.gov “Submission Pending” status informs the organization that their proposal submission is pending in a queue until all linked lead and non-lead proposals in the collaboration attain “Submission Pending” status and can be submitted to NSF as a set. 
• Separately submitted collaborative proposals with a “Submission Pending” status can be edited, but the Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) must resubmit the edited proposal to return it to a “Submission Pending” status.
• A Proposal File Update (PFU) is not required to edit the proposal at the “Submission Pending” stage. However, a PFU could be utilized after the entire collaborative set is submitted to NSF and a proposal ID number for each separately submitted collaborative proposal is generated.
• Submit Proposal Wizard: The AOR Submission Wizard screen will display the lead and non-lead organization information.
• Postdoctoral Mentoring Plan: A Postdoctoral Mentoring Planis only required when funds for postdoctoral scholars are requested on the budget. A proposal compliance error will block proposal submission if there is a mentoring plan but no requested funds.
• Print Concatenate: This functionality is available for lead and non-lead proposals.
• New Automated Compliance Error/Warning Messages and Business Rules for Separately Submitted Collaborative Proposals: Compliance checks triggering an error will prohibit proposal submission to NSF, whereas checks triggering a warning will allow proposal submission to NSF.  
• Delete In-progress Proposals: Proposers can delete their in-progress separately submitted collaborative proposals.
• Redesigned Research.gov “About” Page with New and Updated FAQs: Check out our redesigned Research.gov About Proposal Preparation and Submission webpage with links to new and updated Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) organized by topic.

What’s Ahead?

We are also happy to share that NSF is currently developing the following capabilities in Research.gov:

• Other Authorized User (OAU) role changes (see Research.gov advisory currently posted)
• Support for Single Copy Documents
• Submission of Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Phase I and Phase II proposals
• Submission of Rapid Response Research (RAPID), Early-concept Grants for Exploratory Research (EAGER), and Research Advanced by Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering (RAISE) proposals

Stay tuned for additional information about these developments in the coming months!

Help NSF Build Research.gov

Research.gov is being developed incrementally, and features will expand with the goal of eventually transitioning all proposal preparation and submission functionality from FastLane to Research.gov. NSF strongly encourages the use of Research.gov where possible and wants feedback on your experience, so we can continue to offer a better user experience. Please submit your feedback on the Research.gov Feedback page (select “Proposal Preparation & Submission” under the Site Area dropdown menu).

We would appreciate you sharing this information with your colleagues. If you have IT system-related questions, please contact the NSF Help Desk at 1-800-381-1532 (7:00 AM – 9:00 PM ET; Monday – Friday except federal holidays) or via [email protected] . Policy-related questions should be directed to [email protected] .

We look forward to receiving your Research.gov proposals and your feedback about our new system!

Jean Feldman

Head, Policy Office

Division of Institution and Award Support

Office of Budget, Finance & Award Management

National Science Foundation

email: policy @nsf.gov

Senior Contract & Grant Officer

COVID-19 : In response to the SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 (Coronavirus ) pandemic, the Office of Research will be telecommuting through May 01, 2020. During this time, email is the best method of contact as voicemails will be checked periodically. For information about Research Continuity planning and updates please visit: https://news.research.uci.edu/research-continuity

Sponsored Projects Administration   Office of Research University of California, Irvine 141 Innovation Drive, Suite 250

Irvine, CA  92697-7600 PH:  (949) 824-2237 E-mail:  [email protected] http://www.research.uci.edu/

** Sign up for the CG News listserv by sending a blank email to:   [email protected]

• Utility Menu

• Site Search

Update on Proposals in Research.gov

Please see following announcement from NSF regarding Research.gov:

Dear Colleagues:

Effective March 22, the National Science Foundation (NSF) enabled three new proposal types in the Research.gov Proposal Submission System and in the recently launched Research.gov Proposal Preparation Demo Site. These are the Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED), Equipment, and Travel proposal types. New automated compliance checks and associated error and warning messages for these proposal types were also implemented. In addition, proposal withdrawal functionality was added for both single submission (with or without subawards) and separately submitted collaborative proposals from multiple organizations. New training resources have also been added to the Research.gov About Proposal Preparation and Submission page.

FASED, Equipment, and Travel Proposals

• Rapid Response Research (RAPID)
• EArly-concept Grants for Exploratory Research (EAGER)
• Research Advanced by Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering (RAISE)
• All supported proposal types are available in the Research.gov Proposal Preparation Demo Site.
• A reminder: Error messages prohibit proposal submission to NSF, whereas warning messages still permit proposal submission.
• Refer to the Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) (NSF 20-1) for FASED, Equipment, and Travel proposal requirements.

Proposal Withdrawal Functionality

• Proposing organizations can now withdraw both single submission (with or without subawards) and separately submitted collaborative proposals from multiple organizations in Research.gov.
• Organizations no longer need to contact the NSF Help Desk to initiate Research.gov proposal withdrawal actions.
• A new Proposal Withdrawal section has been added to the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Research.gov About Proposal Preparation and Submission page left navigation menu.
• Refer to PAPPG Chapter IV.A. for proposal withdrawal requirements.

Training Resources

• New and updated system-related FAQs by topic are available on the Research.gov About Proposal Preparation and Submission page left navigation menu.
• Setting up a proposal
• Uploading a document and compliance messaging
• Preparing Proposal File Update/Budget Revisions
• A new How-to Guides section has been added to the Research.gov About Proposal Preparation and Submission page left navigation menu. The initial topic-specific guide is posted, and new guides will be added to this section going forward.

What's Ahead?

Research.gov is being developed incrementally, and features are expanding to support the transition of all proposal preparation and submission functionality from FastLane to Research.gov in accordance with NSF Important Notice 147: Research.gov Implementation Update issued September 22, 2020. Please refer to the Research.gov Proposal Submission Capabilities to see what is in development.

Questions? If you have IT system-related questions, please contact the NSF Help Desk at 1-800-381-1532 (7:00 AM - 9:00 PM ET; Monday - Friday except federal holidays) or via [email protected] . Policy-related questions should be directed to [email protected] .

We look forward to receiving your Research.gov FASED, Equipment, and Travel proposals and seeing you on the demo site.

Regards, Jean

Jean Feldman Head, Policy Office Division of Institution and Award Support Office of Budget, Finance & Award Management email: [email protected]

Welcome to the OSP Blog!

Please note that policies and guidance are subject to revision, and specific policies and guidance referenced in past blog posts may have been updated since the posts' original publication dates. If you have any questions regarding whether a policy or guidance referenced in an older blog post is still in effect, please visit the  Policies and Guidance section of our website or contact your OSP representative .

Blog posts by month

• August 2024 (9)
• July 2024 (10)
• June 2024 (6)
• May 2024 (5)
• April 2024 (4)

Office of Sponsored Projects

Vp for research, main navigation, grant life cycle.

• Develop a Preliminary Idea
• Assess Your Idea's Potential for Success
• Seek Input & Feedback
• Find Sources
• Search Solicitations/Funding Announcements
• Review the Solicitation
• Understand PI Eligibility
• Communicate Early
• Find Development Tools
• Learn Standard Proposal Components
• Build Your Budget
• Obtain Subrecipient Documentation
• Coordinate Compliance Components
• Obtain Approvals
• Understand Submission Processes
• Check for Completeness, Accuracy and Proper Formatting
• Electronic Submission & Registration
• Resubmit your Proposal
• Read & Understand Sponsor Guidelines
• Manage Your Budget
• Collecting & Analyzing Data
• Authoring & Journal Selection
• Publishing & Peer Review
• Archiving & Preservation
• Citation & Metrics

NSF Collaborative Proposals

Collaborative proposals are those in which investigators from two or more organizations wish to collaborate on a unified research project. They may be submitted to NSF in one of two methods: as a single proposal, in which a single award is being requested (with subawards administered by the lead organization); or by simultaneous submission of proposals from different organizations, with each organization requesting a separate award (lead institution links the separate awards in Research.gov).

Single Proposal

To complete a subaward budget:

• As lead institution/PI: On the "Form Preparation" screen, select "Budgets" and "Go to Form." On the "Organization Selector" screen click on "Add New Org.", and pull up the subaward organization. Then on the "Organization Selector" screen click on "Use" to create a budget for an organization (may need to “Add Senior Person”). You will need to add the subaward total amount of request to item G.5 Subawards of the PI's Awardee organization budget.

For proposals involving subawards, see Obtain Subrecipient Information .

Simultaneous Submission

The collaborative proposal mechanism requires that one institution be named the "lead" for the purpose of submitting the proposal. The lead institution is typically the one whose scientists are doing the bulk of the work in terms of writing the proposal and/or those that will manage the largest portion of the funds should the proposal be awarded. 

Who does what

• Both the lead and non-lead institutions must create a new proposal in Research.gov.
• When completing the cover sheet, institutions should list only those PIs and coPIs affiliated with their own institution.
• The proposal title must begin with "Collaborative Research:" and all titles, start dates, durations, and NSF programs must be the same across the institutions.

Lead institutions’ submission will include a:

• Proposal Cover Sheet;
• Project Summary;
• Project Description;
• References Cited;
• Biographical Sketches (for senior personnel affiliated with their institution);
• Budgets and budget justification (for the portion of work to be managed by their institution);
• Current & Pending Support;
• Data Management Plan; and
• Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources (for their institution).
• Post-doc Mentoring Plan (if required) for the entire project
• All supplementary single copy documents (ie conflicts of interest tables)
• Any other supplementary documents (ie letters of commitment, quotes, etc.) allowed by the program

Non-lead institution  submissions must include the following for their organization. The project summary, project description, and references cited (which are the same for all collaborating organizations) are only submitted by the Lead. 

• Cover Sheet
• Budget and budget justification (for the portion of work to be managed by their institution)
• Facilities, Equipment & Other Resources (for their institution)
• Proposal Classification Form (if submitting to BIO)
• Biographical Sketches (for senior personnel affiliated with their institution)
• Current & Pending Support (for senior personnel affiliated with their institution)

While it is acceptable for the non-lead institutions to upload their own supplementary documents, it is recommended that this only be done by the lead institution so that the order of the documents can be controlled.

Linking the Proposals Together

Important: None of the proposals should be submitted to NSF until they are all linked together. 

• Once the proposals are linked, Research.gov will combine the proposal submission for printing or electronic viewing.

Collaborative proposals require simultaneous submission of proposals. One organization has the lead role but all are required to submit their original proposal to NSF .

For Research.gov, this means that

• Each organization prepares their proposal (thus creating a temporary proposal number).
• Each non-lead institution provides the temporary proposal number to the lead institution.
• The lead institution initiates linking by entering each non-lead institution’s proposal ID in Research.gov by using the “Link Collaborative Proposals” option found on the “Form Preparation Screen.”  The lead institution will 'SEND LINK REQUEST' to the non-lead.
• The request must be accepted by the non-lead in the non-lead institution proposal in the Link/View Collaborative Proposals page.
• The lead institution will see the non-lead institutions that have accepted or rejected links as well as any pending link requests. 
• Each institution can continue to do work on their own institution’s proposal, and submit when ready "within a reasonable timeframe of one another" (thus non-lead institutions can submit before the lead institution, as long as the lead institution has linked the proposals; non-lead institutions can also submit after the lead).
• When you are working with no external deadline, coordination and communication between the collaborators becomes more important. Historically, NSF has required that collaborative proposal be submitted within "a reasonable timeframe of one another" but hasn't stated what they consider reasonable.
• After linking, each institution submits their proposal. Thus, each institution comes up with a different proposal number – but, in Research.gov, those separate proposals are linked together for printing or electronic viewing (with NO new collaborative number).

OSP is not able to see the submission status of linked proposals. Therefore, PI’s should verify the successful submission of lead and non-lead institution proposals.

Reviewing Linked Proposals

It is important to review the full proposal document that will be submitted. Both the lead and non-lead institutions can review the proposal when linked. To do this, simply click the "Print Proposal" button in Research.gov. All components of proposal that have been uploaded into Research.gov will appear as a PDF file.

NOTE: While non-lead proposals do not have to be submitted on the same day as the lead collaborative, PAPPG states that all components of the collaborative proposal must meet any established deadline date, and failure to do so may result in the entire collaborative proposal being returned without review. NSF requires submission of linked proposals within "a reasonable time" of one another but does not set a specific timeframe. OSP recommends within 48 hours of each other to help ensure a successful submission.

• NSF Proposals and Award Policies Preparation Instructions (PAPPG) 22-1

Compliance protocols MUST be approved and linked in SeRA to a SPO project record prior to award acceptance. 

NSF Launches Research.gov Demo Site for Proposal Preparation

The National Science Foundation (NSF) has launched the  Research.gov proposal preparation demonstration site . The new demo site offers proposers the opportunity to create proposals in Research.gov with the role of a Principal Investigator (PI) prior to preparing and submitting proposals in the actual Research.gov Proposal Submission System. We invite you to try the Research.gov proposal preparation features on the new demo site, such as:

• Initiating Research proposals (other proposal types will be added to the demo site as they are enabled in the actual system):

 Single submissions from one organization  Collaborative proposals with subawards  Separately submitted collaborative proposals from multiple organizations

• Adding co-PIs, Senior Personnel, and Other Authorized Users (OAUs)
• Uploading required and optional proposal documents
• Creating budgets
• Checking proposal compliance
• Adding subawards
• Linking collaborative proposals
• Enabling Sponsored Project Officer (SPO)/Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) access

What You Need to Know About the New Research.gov Demo Site

• All users must sign in to Research.gov with an NSF ID or primary email address to access the demo site.

 Users without an NSF account (i.e., NSF ID) will first need to register for one to use the demo site.

 Users who already have an NSF ID must not register for another NSF ID for demo site use. As a reminder, each individual user of NSF systems (e.g., FastLane and Research.gov) should not have more than one NSF ID, per the NSF  Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide Chapter I.G.3 .

• A red "Proposal Preparation Demo Site" banner is at the top of each demo site page to indicate the user is using the demo site.
• Each user will be given the PI role for demo site purposes only. No other user roles (e.g., SPO and AOR) are available on the demo site or are needed to use the demo site.
• The demo site does not support proposal submission to NSF and will not trigger any system-generated email notifications.
• Proposals created on the demo site will be deleted after six months. Neither NSF staff nor users will be able to access deleted proposal data from the demo site.
• Demo site proposals will not be available on the actual Research.gov Proposal Submission System, and proposals cannot be transferred between the demo site and the actual system.
• For further demo site details, please see the  demo site Frequently Asked Questions  (FAQs) available via the  Research.gov About Proposal Preparation and Submission  page left navigation menu. A set of topic-specific video tutorials is also available.

Accessing the Research.gov Proposal Preparation Demo Site

To access the Research.gov demo site, you  must  have an NSF account (i.e., NSF ID) and be signed in to Research.gov.

If you have an NSF account:

 Access  Research.gov Demo Site: Prepare Proposals . (If you are not signed in, you will be prompted to sign in before accessing the demo site.)

If you do not have an NSF account

 Open  Research.gov .

 Use the  Register  tab located on the top right of the screen to create an NSF account.

 Input the requested account registration information.

Important Note:  Your primary registered email address will be used for NSF account notifications including password resets and can be used to sign in to Research.gov. Please ensure that you have ongoing access to your primary registered email (e.g., a personal email address), even if you change organizations. Refer to the  Research.gov About Account Management  page for additional registration guidance.

Retirement of FastLane Demo Site

The FastLane demo site has been retired, however, we encourage you to try the new Research.gov proposal preparation demo site. In accordance with  Important Notice No. 147: Research.gov Implementation Update , NSF is taking proactive steps to incrementally move the preparation and submission of all proposals from FastLane to Research.gov.

Enhancements Coming Soon to Research.gov

Effective in late November 2020, NSF will:

• Enable the following proposal types on Research.gov and on the new Research.gov proposal preparation demo site:

 Rapid Response Research (RAPID)

 EArly-concept Grants for Exploratory Research (EAGER)

 Research Advanced by Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering (RAISE)

• Remove the font type and font size compliance checks and associated warning messages per feedback from the research community.

Stay tuned for additional information about these updates in the next couple of weeks.

Questions?  If you have IT system-related questions, please contact the NSF Help Desk at 1-800-381-1532 (7:00 AM - 9:00 PM ET; Monday - Friday except federal holidays) or via  [email protected] . Policy-related questions should be directed to  [email protected] .

Facilities & Administrative Rates for FY2025 and FY2026

Final fringe benefits rates for fy2025, important updates for nsf principal investigators.

• Announcements

Alert: Recent phishing attempts

Please read important tax updates that took effect for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2021.

New 2024 SBIR/STTR Phase I and Phase II funding opportunities posted. Read for more details and for Project Pitch invitation updates.

Proposal submission

SBIR/STTR proposals must be submitted via Research.gov Proposal Submission System.

This system provides the ability to create, submit, track, and update proposals. Follow the steps below for accessing Research.gov and submitting your proposal using Proposal Wizard Set-up.

Access Research.gov

• Open Research.gov.

• From the My Desktop page, select the “Letters of Intent and Proposals” link under the Prepare & Submit Proposals category

• Once “Full Proposal” is selected, the custom proposal setup wizard will initiate a new proposal.

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS. A lock ( Lock Locked padlock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Dear Colleague Letter: Funding Opportunities for Science and Engineering Research with Impact on Women's Health

March 18, 2024

Dear Colleagues:

With this Dear Colleague Letter (DCL), in response to the White House Initiative on Women's Health Research , the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) encourages the submission of research and education proposals related to women's health. Despite making up more than half of the population, women are historically understudied and underrepresented in health research. The historical exclusion of women from scientific and biomedical research studies, combined with the undervaluation of research that advances knowledge on conditions that uniquely, differentially, or disproportionately affect women, has resulted in significant knowledge and health gaps. Addressing these research gaps will ultimately advance the health, prosperity, and welfare of all.

NSF continues to support fundamental science and engineering research with implications for women's health. This DCL reaffirms NSF's commitment to fund discovery, innovation, and research translation on topics of relevance to women's health, from the molecular to the ecosystem level, including input from the full range of science, engineering, and education that NSF supports. Pioneering the next generation of discoveries in women's health will require a sustained effort focusing on the socioeconomic impact of women's health, breaking down disciplinary boundaries in carrying out the necessary research to advance understanding of relevant questions, and building a diverse STEM workforce committed to advancing women's health and the health of a citizens.

The National Science Foundation encourages the submission of fundamental research and education proposals related to women's health topics, including, but not limited to, proposals in the following areas:

• Projects that develop a well-informed citizenry and a diverse and capable STEM workforce that will pioneer the next generation of discoveries in women's health.
• Science and engineering approaches and novel computational models that elucidate factors that interact with and impact women's health, such as studies that examine the genetic, epigenetic, biological, economic, societal, and environmental determinants of women's health and cognition.
• Holistic approaches to women's health and development, including aging, by moving beyond diagnostics and disease management to include novel methods for discovery and monitoring. This includes, but is not limited to, wearable devices, and other types of sensing and imaging technologies that improve early detection, as well as telehealth platforms that broaden accessibility and promote women's health.
• Foundational and transformative research that advances our understanding of engineering biomechanics and/or mechanobiology related to women's health.
• Advanced biomanufacturing of cells, tissues, or organs relevant to women's health.
• Engineering research that advances the understanding of injury mechanisms and rehabilitation technologies for health conditions and disabilities that affect women.
• Development of validated models (living or computational) of healthy and pathological cells, tissues, and organ systems relevant to women's health that improve the understanding of these systems.
• Projects on novel computational approaches (i.e. multi-level and multiscale data, sensing, prediction) that examine the effects of women's health on mental and physical development across the life span and that support health decision making.
• Projects that foster partnerships with government, industry, nonprofits, civil society, and communities of practice to leverage, energize, and rapidly bring to society use-inspired research and innovation that may include, but are not limited to, innovations that enable fundamental research of women's health topics, and breakthrough technologies designed for women.
• Transdisciplinary approaches to environmental change challenges and opportunities to improve understanding of climate, environment, and health pathways to protect and promote women's health, such as research that elucidates mechanisms and/or prevention of pollution transport/exposure implicated in adverse health outcomes.
• Studies that assess theories and models of health, aging, disease, and disease transmission at multiple scales (populational, generational, transgenerational, and geographical), from the molecular to the ecosystem level, including the interaction of environment on molecular scale phenomena.
• Research that seeks to advance knowledge about the processes that shaped biological diversity in living and ancient human species such as effects of life history transitions on women's health; intergenerational effects of violence, stress, and maternal health; and impacts of biocultural context on women's health, reproduction, and epigenetics.
• Research to advance theory on design and management of organizations such as how gendered aging symptoms may affect women's experience at work and in other environments.
• Research and research infrastructure to advance basic knowledge in bias, prejudice, and discrimination directed toward women as well as the intersection of gender and other identities; dynamics of close interpersonal relationships and women's health; and power in relationships.

NSF welcomes proposals that broaden geographic and demographic participation to engage the full spectrum of diverse talent in STEM. Proposals from minority-serving institutions , emerging research institutions , primarily undergraduate institutions, two-year colleges, and institutions in EPSCoR-eligible jurisdictions , along with collaborations between these institutions and those in non-EPSCoR jurisdictions, are encouraged.

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AND RELEVANT NSF PROGRAMS AND CONTACTS

This DCL does not constitute a new competition or program. Proposals submitted in response to this DCL should be prepared and submitted in accordance with guidelines in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) and instructions found in relevant NSF funding opportunities. Investigators who wish to submit proposals on any of these topics, or others related to women's health, are strongly encouraged to reach out to the cognizant NSF Program Officer(s) listed in the relevant funding opportunity to discuss the fit of their ideas to existing program. Specific programs and opportunities list these contacts. For assistance in determining program suitability for a proposal concept, researchers are encouraged to utilize the NSF "Program Suitability & Proposal Concept Tool (ProSPCT) at https://suitability.nsf.gov/s/ . Note that NSF has limitations on the scope of health-related projects that can be submitted to participating programs. More information on these limitations can be found in "Introduction, Part A: about the National Science Foundation" in the PAPPG. In addition to these limitations, investigators should also review new information regarding human subjects in NSF-funded research at https://new.nsf.gov/funding/research-involving-human-subjects .

Susan Marqusee, Assistant Director Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO)

Dilma Da Silva, Acting Assistant Director Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering (CISE)

Susan Margulies, Assistant Director Directorate for Engineering (ENG)

James Luther Moore, Assistant Director Directorate for STEM Education (EDU)

C. Denise Caldwell, Acting Assistant Director Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences (MPS)

Kendra Sharp, Office Head Office of International Science and Engineering (OISE)

Alicia Knoedler, Office Head Office of Integrated Activities (OIA)

Sylvia M. Butterfield, Acting Assistant Director Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences (SBE)

Erwin Gianchandani, Assistant Director Directorate for Technology, Innovation and Partnerships (TIP)

Research.gov Registration

Activate Your Login Account with an Agency

If you are a principal investigator/project director, once logged in you should activate/associate your account with other Research.gov partner agencies (if you log in with your NSF account, you are automatically associated with NSF). This one-time activation process will give you access to application status information for applications (proposals) submitted to the participating Research.gov partners.

Note: Institution Administrators and Sponsored Project Officers will automatically be associated with all Research.gov partner agencies so that they can access all proposals that have the same Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) ID as their NSF registered organization.

Note: The user's organization must have a valid DUNS Number issued by Dun and Bradstreet and be registered in the Central Contractor Registry (CCR) in order to use Research.gov account-controlled services. To register in the CCR, go to http://www.ccr.gov . Please be advised that it takes approximately two business days to complete the registration process.

Activate Research.gov Partners and Manage Your Activations

Users are allowed to activate multiple agency accounts including other FastLane accounts with a single Research.gov profile. To activate additional accounts navigate to the My Profile link section of Research.gov (Figure 6). This link is available on the right-hand side of the Research.gov Home Page.

Figure 1 – My Profile Link - Research.gov Agency Activation

On the Profile Page users can add and edit your Agency Activations by clicking on Edit My Activations (Figure 2).

Figure 2 – Manage Your Profile and Account

Using the drop down box on the Edit My Activations Page (Figure 3) users can add additional Research.gov partner agencies.

Figure 3 – Add and Edit Your Agency Activation

View/Modify My Profile

Registered users can view their information on Research.gov.

Research.gov gives all registered users the ability to view their profile at any time by clicking the My Profile link on the right side of the user's home page. Users can also view their profile by clicking their name or "Guest" under the Research.gov header at the top of the homepage.

The "View My Profile" screen lists all of the activations a user has in the Research.gov system. The profile list includes the user's name and the following for each Research.gov activation:

Institution

Note: If a row in the Agency column is 'ALL', the user has the same role for All agencies using Research.gov.

User Account Management

The User Management Service provides a mechanism for Institution Administrators to manage user accounts associated with their institution. Only Institution Administrators have access to the User Management Service in Research.gov. Institution Administrators can perform the following functions with the User Management service:

·         Search For Users

·         Add A New User

·         Modify An Existing User

·         View A User Profile

Please note: Research.gov does not provide the ability to delete user accounts. Institution Administrators must login to FastLane to delete a user account. However, once the account has been deleted from FastLane, the deletion will be propagated to Research.gov. When a user's account is deleted in FastLane, all NSF Agency Activations for the user are removed from Research.gov. Partner Agency Activations are not deleted. This allows the deleted user to still login to Research.gov using their E-Auth account to check Partner Agency data.

Searching For Users

Institution Administrators can search for existing users in Research.gov by clicking the User Management link under the Administration tab from the top navigation.

Figure 4 – User Management

Users can be searched for by Last Name or by Institution. To search for a user by Last Name, enter the first few letters of the user's Last Name and click the Search button. You can also select an institution to limit the search to a particular institution. To search by institution, simply select an institution from the institution drop down list and click the Search button. This will return all of the users for the selected institution. To view all users for all institutions, click the View All button.

Figure 5 – User Management Search Results

Export Search Results to Excel

To export your results to Excel, select the Export to Excel link from the Search Results page.

If the data in the spreadsheet does not display fully, expand the column to see remaining data.

Adding A New User

New users can be added in Research.gov by navigating to the User Management service and clicking the Add User button. Doing this will launch the new user entry form.  New users added in Research.gov will also have access to the NSF FastLane system.  Use the following steps to add a new user:

1.     Select an institution in which you would like to add the new user Select a role for the user. User roles include:

1.     Institution Administrator

2.     Sponsored Program Officer

3.     Principal Investigator For more information on User Roles, see the Research.gov/FastLane permission mapping table below.

2.     Fill in the required fields (marked with an asterisk) to and click the Submit button.

Note: In order for a user to have the necessary roles for Federal Financial Report service, appropriate permissions must be assigned in FastLane. There are FastLane permissions that map to Research.gov’s Federal Functions Report Preparer (FFRPREP) and Federal Functional Report Certifier (FFRCERT) roles.

Figure 6 – Add User screen

After submitting the new user entry, a preview screen is provided that allows the user to verify all information is entered correctly. If all the information is correct click the Continue button to add the user. If any problem exists, click the Edit button to return to the "Add User" screen and correct the user information. After correcting the user information, repeat the submission process.

Figure 7 – Verify User Profile page

Research.gov Role to FastLane Permission Mappings

Research.gov roles are used to give users access to the system. FastLane uses permissions to give users access to the system. Not all FastLane permissions are available in Research.gov.  Changes to a user's role in Research.gov will be made in NSF's FastLane as well! The following table outlines the Research.gov Role to FastLane Permission mappings:

Figure 8 – Research.gov Role to FastLane Permission mappings

Modifying A User

Much like the Add User functionality, an existing user account can be modified in Research.gov.  Changes to a user's role in Research.gov will be made in NSF's FastLane as well!

The Research.gov User Management module gives Institution Administrators the ability to modify the profile of an existing user. Institution Administrators may edit the following user attributes:

Email Address

Phone Number

To modify a user account, click on the User Management service on the left navigation bar. Perform the following steps to modify a user:

1.     Search for a user you would like to update

2.     Select the Modify link for the desired user

3.     Update the user's profile

4.     Click the Submit button

5.     Follow the screen prompts to continue updating the user’s account

Figure 9 – Modify User page

Viewing A User Profile

To view a user's profile perform the following actions:

1.     Search for a user you would like to view

2.     Select the View link for the desired user

Figure 10 – View User Profile page

Research.gov Roles

Below is a table outlining the views based on user roles.

Create a Visitor Login Account

To sign up for a Visitor Login, please:

• Click on Log In, located in the upper right-hand corner of the site.
• Click on the Log In for NSF Visitors link from this page
• Click on the Registor Now link from the Visitor Log in page
• On the Register for a Visitor Account page (Figure 11), create a user ID and password, as well as a secret question and answer for security purposes (in case you forget your password). Note: A valid email address is required in order to create a login. Entering additional information, such as your contact information, congressional district, and company/organization, is optional but will allow us to better identify information, news and events that may be of interest to you.
• Click Save at the bottom of the form to complete the registration process.

Figure 11 - Register for a Visitor Account Page

• To use your login, repeat Steps 1-2 and enter the User ID and Password you created on the Visitor Log in page.

Note: A valid email address is required in order to create a login. Additional information, such as your contact information, congressional district, and company/organization, is optional.

Log in as an NSF User

The NSF User Account gives applicants and awardees access to grants management services from NSF and its partner agencies to help them monitor proposal status, manage awards, and meet reporting requirements. In order to obtain an NSF User Account, your organization must be registered in NSF’s FastLane system. To request an NSF User Account from your registered organization, please contact your organization’s FastLane administrator. Please note, all FastLane users are automatically registered for NSF User Accounts in Research.gov and can login using their NSF (FastLane) user ID and password.

Log into Research.gov using your NSF User Account:

Figure 12 - Research.gov Homepage.

You will be redirected to a page where you will enter your last name, NSF ID, and password and click Login. 

Figure 13 - NSF User Login Page.

Log in as NSF Staff

NSF Staff can log into Research.gov using their NSF LAN ID and password to access the Research.gov Desktop and services. Please note: you must log in from the NSF Internal Network, Access NSF, or AccessWorkspace to access the Research.gov Desktop.

Note: If you have forgotten your ID or password, please contact IT Help Central at 703-292-HELP or [email protected]

To log in as NSF Staff:

• Click on the Log In for NSF Staff link from this page

Figure 14 – Log in as NSF Staff

• Enter your NSF ID and password in the appropriate fields.

Figure 15 - Research.gov NSF Staff Login

• Click on the Log In button.

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS. A lock ( Lock Locked padlock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Active funding opportunity

Nsf 24-598: mid-scale research infrastructure-1 (mid-scale ri-1), program solicitation, document information, document history.

• Posted: August 19, 2024
• Replaces: NSF 22-637

Program Solicitation NSF 24-598

Preliminary Proposal Due Date(s) (required) (due by 5 p.m. submitting organization's local time):

November 18, 2024

Preliminary proposal is required

September 01, 2026

Full Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitting organization's local time):

March 19, 2025

Full proposal is by invitation only

February 08, 2027

Important Information And Revision Notes

Full proposal submission is by invitation only.

Please consult NSF's Research Infrastructure Guide (RIG ) , available at https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/lfo/lfo_documents.jsp for definitions of certain terms used in this solicitation, such as the Project Execution Plan (PEP) and Design Execution Plan (DEP). As noted in the RIG section specific to Mid-scale Research Infrastructure (Mid-scale RI), the PEP or DEP should be scaled for the complexity of the Mid-scale RI implementation project or design activity, and may not require all of the elements described elsewhere in the RIG.

The Mid-scale RI-1 Program seeks broad representation in its proposal and award portfolio, including a geographically diverse set of institutions (such as those in EPSCoR jurisdictions). We encourage input from all, to include those PIs who are from groups underrepresented in STEM. To improve participation in science and engineering research for persons with disabilities, Mid-scale RI-1 encourages PIs to incorporate accessibility as part of any Mid-scale RI-1 design activity or implementation project.

For projects that are invited to submit full proposals, an Environmental Checklist must be provided as a Single Copy Document. Details are provided under the Full Proposal Preparation section of this solicitation.

Consistent with the requirements of the Build America, Buy America Act (Pub. L. 117-58, Division G, Title IX, Subtitle A, November 15, 2021), funding made available through this funding opportunity is subject to the requirement that iron, steel, manufactured products, and construction materials used in the project are produced in the United States unless waivers are submitted and granted. For additional information, see Section VII below and visit NSF's Build America, Buy America web page.

Information about budget contingency has been included to indicate that such requests should be included on Line G.6. of the NSF Budget pages.

Information has been provided to indicate what may be requested as part of design activities. For PIs proposing research in the Antarctic, a requirement for consultation with the NSF Office of Polar Programs (OPP) to discuss the timing and feasibility of the project has been added. For projects requiring logistical support in the Arctic region, please consult with the NSF Arctic Research Support and Logistics (RSL) Program to discuss any support requirements (see: https://www.nsf.gov/geo/opp/arctic/res_log_sup.jsp ). Documentation in the form of email correspondence must be provided as a Single Copy Document in both preliminary and (if invited) full proposals.

For both preliminary and invited full proposals, a separately submitted spreadsheet, available here , must be submitted by email to [email protected] listing information needed to manage reviewer selection. This is in addition to the required Collaborators and Other Affiliations Information.

Any proposal submitted in response to this solicitation should be submitted in accordance with the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) that is in effect for the relevant due date to which the proposal is being submitted. The NSF PAPPG is regularly revised and it is the responsibility of the proposer to ensure that the proposal meets the requirements specified in this solicitation and the applicable version of the PAPPG. Submitting a proposal prior to a specified deadline does not negate this requirement.

Summary Of Program Requirements

General information.

Program Title:

Mid-scale Research Infrastructure-1 (Mid-scale RI-1)

NSF-supported science and engineering research increasingly relies on cutting-edge infrastructure. With its Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) program and Major Multi-user Facilities ("Major Facilities") projects, NSF supports infrastructure projects at the lower and higher range of infrastructure project costs, Foundation-wide, across science and engineering research disciplines. The Foundation-wide Mid-scale Research Infrastructure opportunity is intended to provide NSF with an agile, Foundation-wide process to fund experimental research capabilities in the mid-scale range between MRI and Major Multi-user Facilities. NSF defines Research Infrastructure (RI) as any combination of facilities, equipment, instrumentation, or computational hardware or software, and the necessary human capital in support of the same. Major facilities and mid-scale projects are subsets of research infrastructure. The NSF Mid-scale Research Infrastructure-1 Program (Mid-scale RI-1) supports either design activities or implementation of unique and compelling RI projects. Mid-scale implementation projects may include any combination of equipment, instrumentation, cyberinfrastructure, broadly used large scale datasets and the personnel needed to successfully commission the project. Mid-scale RI-1 design activities include the design efforts intended to lead to eventual implementation of a mid-scale class RI project. Mid-scale RI-1 projects should involve the training of a diverse workforce engaged in the design and implementation of STEM research infrastructure. Mid-scale RI-1 projects should directly enable advances in any of the research domains supported by NSF. Projects may also include upgrades to existing research infrastructure. Mid-scale RI-1 emphasizes strong scientific merit, a response to an identified need of the research community and/or fulfillment of a national need to enable U.S. researchers to be competitive in a global research environment. Well-conceived technical and management plans are essential for both design and implementation proposals, as are well-developed plans (e.g., mentoring and professional development) for student training and the involvement of a diverse STEM workforce in all aspects of mid-scale design and/or implementation activities. The inclusion of individual project participants that will lead to a supportive working environment is especially encouraged at all levels of the project team. Within Mid-scale RI-1, proposers may submit two types of projects, "Implementation" (e.g., acquisition and/or construction) or "Design". The "Design" track is intended to facilitate progress toward readiness for a mid-scale range implementation project. Both Implementation projects and Design activities may involve new or upgraded research infrastructure. Mid-scale RI-1 "Implementation" projects may have a total project cost ranging from $4 million up to but not including $20 million. Mid-scale RI-1 "Design" activities may request less than $4 million, with a minimum request of $400,000 and a maximum request up to but not including $20 million, as appropriate, to prepare for a future mid-scale range implementation project. Note: Successful award of a Mid-scale RI-1 design activity does not imply NSF's commitment to the future implementation of the project being designed, nor is a Mid-scale RI-1 design award required for the submission of an implementation project. The Mid-scale RI-1 Program seeks to broaden the representation of PIs and institutions in its award portfolio, including a geographically diverse set of institutions (especially those in EPSCoR jurisdictions). Proposals submitted by, or involving partnerships between institutions are encouraged. Participation in this opportunity is encouraged for the full spectrum of diverse talent society has to offer to include PIs who are women, early-career researchers, persons with disabilities, or members of other groups underrepresented in STEM. To improve participation in science and engineering research for persons with disabilities, Mid-scale RI-1 encourages PIs to incorporate accessibility as part of Mid-scale RI-1 design activity and implementation projects. Please consult NSF's Research Infrastructure Guide, or RIG (available at https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/lfo/lfo_documents.jsp ), for definitions of certain terms used in this solicitation, such as the Project Execution Plan (PEP) and Design and Execution Plan (DEP). The RIG provides guidance specific to Mid-scale Research Infrastructure Projects, including references to other parts of the RIG as needed. Note that PEP or DEP should be appropriately scaled for the complexity of the project and may not require all of the elements described in the RIG. Mid-scale research infrastructure projects with total project costs beyond the Mid-scale RI-1 Program limit are separately solicited through the Mid-scale RI-2 Program. Proposals to the Mid-scale RI-1 Program with total project costs outside of this solicitation's budgetary limits, either during initial submission or after cost analyses/revisions during subsequent review, are subject to return without further review.

Broadening Participation In STEM

NSF recognizes the unique lived experiences of individuals from communities that are underrepresented and/or underserved in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and the barriers to inclusion and access to STEM education and careers. NSF highly encourages the leadership, partnership, and contributions in all NSF opportunities of individuals who are members of such communities supported by NSF. This includes leading and designing STEM research and education proposals for funding; serving as peer reviewers, advisory committee members, and/or committee of visitor members; and serving as NSF leadership, program, and/or administrative staff. NSF also highly encourages demographically diverse institutions of higher education (IHEs) to lead, partner, and contribute to NSF opportunities on behalf of their research and education communities. NSF expects that all individuals, including those who are members of groups that are underrepresented and/or under-served in STEM, are treated equitably and inclusively in the Foundation's proposal and award process.

NSF encourages IHEs that enroll, educate, graduate, and employ individuals who are members of groups underrepresented and/or under-served in STEM education programs and careers to lead, partner, and contribute to NSF opportunities, including leading and designing STEM research and education proposals for funding. Such IHEs include, but may not be limited to, community colleges and two-year institutions, mission-based institutions such as Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), Tribal Colleges and Universities (TCUs), women's colleges, and institutions that primarily serve persons with disabilities, as well as institutions defined by enrollment such as Predominantly Undergraduate Institutions (PUIs), Minority-Serving Institutions (MSIs), and Hispanic Serving Institutions (HSIs).

"Broadening participation in STEM" is the comprehensive phrase used by NSF to refer to the Foundation's goal of increasing the representation and diversity of individuals, organizations, and geographic regions that contribute to STEM teaching, research, and innovation. To broaden participation in STEM, it is necessary to address issues of equity, inclusion, and access in STEM education, training, and careers. Whereas all NSF programs might support broadening participation components, some programs primarily focus on supporting broadening participation research and projects. Examples can be found on the NSF Broadening Participation in STEM website.

Cognizant Program Officer(s):

Please note that the following information is current at the time of publishing. See program website for any updates to the points of contact.

• Randy L. Phelps, Staff Associate, OIA/IA, telephone: (703) 292-5049, email: [email protected]
• Jonathan Friedman, Program Director, telephone: (703) 292-7475, email: [email protected]
• 47.041 --- Engineering
• 47.049 --- Mathematical and Physical Sciences
• 47.050 --- Geosciences
• 47.070 --- Computer and Information Science and Engineering
• 47.074 --- Biological Sciences
• 47.075 --- Social Behavioral and Economic Sciences
• 47.076 --- STEM Education
• 47.083 --- Office of Integrative Activities (OIA)

Award Information

Anticipated Type of Award: Standard Grant or Continuing Grant or Cooperative Agreement

Estimated Number of Awards: 5 to 10

The number of awards within each Mid-scale RI-1 category (Implementation and Design) will depend on the program funding level, and the number, budgets and quality of proposals received by NSF in each category. Mid-scale RI-1 is expected to be a biennial competition, with the frequency being dependent on the availability of appropriated funds. Proposals will typically be funded for up to five years, commensurate with the scope of the project.

"Implementation" projects may have a total project cost ranging from $4 million up to but not including $20 million. Only "Design" activities may request less than $4 million, with a minimum request of $400,000 and a maximum request up to but not including $20 million.

Anticipated Funding Amount: $100,000,000

Each of the anticipated FY 2025/26 and FY2027/28 Mid-scale RI-1 competitions will be anticipating $100 million for awards, with $50 million in each fiscal year, subject to appropriations.

Eligibility Information

Who May Submit Proposals:

Proposals may only be submitted by the following: Proposals may only be submitted by organizations located in the United States, its territories, or possessions, as follows. Institutions of higher education (Ph.D.-granting and non-Ph.D.-granting), acting on behalf of their faculty members, that are accredited in and have their main campus in the United States, its territories, or possessions. Distinct academic campuses (e.g., that award their own degrees, have independent administrative structures, admissions policies, alumni associations, etc.) within multi-campus systems qualify as separate submission-eligible institutions. Not-for-profit, non-degree-granting domestic U.S. organizations, acting on behalf of their employees, for example (but not limited to) independent museums and science centers, observatories, research laboratories and similar organizations that are directly associated with the Nation's research activities. These organizations must have an independent, permanent administrative organization (e.g., a sponsored projects office) located in the United States, its territories, or possessions, and have 501(c)(3) tax status. Consortia as follows: A legally incorporated, not-for-profit consortium that includes two or more submission-eligible organizations as described in items (1) and (2) above. Such a consortium is one with an independent administrative structure (e.g., a sponsored projects office) located in the United States, its territories, or possessions and has 501(c)(3) status. Submission-eligible organizations as described in items (1) and (2) above, on behalf of an informal consortium. The Cover Sheet of such a proposal must identify both a PI and co-PI(s) from at least two Mid-scale RI-1 submission-eligible organizations (items 1 and/or 2 above) as lead investigators in the consortium. These consortium proposals may also include as partners, via sub-awards, other U.S. and non-U.S. organizations that are not eligible to submit Mid-scale RI-1 proposals. In either case, the proposal title should indicate that a consortium is proposing. For-profit commercial organizations, especially U.S. small businesses with strong capabilities in scientific or engineering research or education, are eligible for infrastructure support through sub-awards/subcontracts as private sector partners with submitting organizations; they may not submit proposals in response to this solicitation. Such partnerships must be substantive and meaningful and build capacity for infrastructure development within Mid-scale RI-1 submission-eligible organization(s). In addition, the value added by the for-profit commercial organization should be justified as a unique contribution that is otherwise unavailable within organizations described in (1) and (2). Unless otherwise specified in the award, title to the resulting infrastructure should be retained by the Mid-scale RI-1-eligible performing organization. Prospective PIs may contact cognizant Mid-scale RI-1 program officers regarding organizational eligibility, and for information on other NSF funding opportunities for instrumentation and research infrastructure. Additionally: Proposals that augment MREFC projects: The Mid-scale RI-1 program will not accept proposals for an instrument or other infrastructure that augments an ongoing NSF Major Multi-user Facility or Mid-scale RI-2 project in the construction stage, since the scope of those projects is already defined. A list of Major Facilities projects is available at https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/lfo/docs/major-facilities-list.pdf and the Mid-scale RI-2 projects link lists awards made through that program. Proposals involving other Federal agencies, their labs or FFRDCs: NSF's Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs) are eligible to submit under item 2) above. Proposals involving another Federal agency, one of their labs or one of their FFRDCs must be submitted as a consortium proposal by a submission-eligible organization as described in item 3(b) above. In addition, a second submission-eligible organization must be involved as well as the agency/lab/FFRDC (or its managing organization) as a partner in the consortium. Such involvement must make unique contributions to the needs of researchers within the consortium and/or establish access to new multi-user research capabilities. Preliminary inquiry to the cognizant Mid-scale RI-1 point of contact should be made before preparing such a proposal for submission. (The current list of FFRDCs can be found at https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/ffrdclist/ .)

Who May Serve as PI:

There are no restrictions or limits.

Limit on Number of Proposals per Organization:

There are no limits to the number of preliminary proposals submitted as the lead organization. Full proposals are to be submitted only if/when invited by NSF. There is no limit to participation as a partner organization or sub-awardee. Although more than one organization may participate in a proposal, a single organization must accept overall management responsibility for the project. The proposal must be submitted by one organization, with funding provided to any other organization(s) through sub-awards The use of the separately submitted collaborative proposal method is not permitted. The Mid-scale RI-1 Program seeks to broaden the representation of institutions in its award portfolio, including a geographically diverse set of institutions (especially those in EPSCoR jurisdictions), emerging research institutions, and minority-serving institutions.

Limit on Number of Proposals per PI or co-PI: 1

Any one individual may be the Principal Investigator (PI) or co-Principal Investigator (co-PI) for no more than one preliminary or full proposal. A PI or co-PI for a preliminary proposal who is not invited for a full proposal submission may later serve as a co-PI or other senior personnel on an invited full proposal at the full-proposal organization's and PI's discretion.

Proposal Preparation and Submission Instructions

A. proposal preparation instructions.

• Letters of Intent: Not required
• Preliminary Proposals: Submission of Preliminary Proposals is required. Please see the full text of this solicitation for further information.
• Full Proposals submitted via Research.gov: NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide  (PAPPG) guidelines apply. The complete text of the PAPPG is available electronically on the NSF website at: https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg .
• Full Proposals submitted via Grants.gov: NSF Grants.gov Application Guide: A Guide for the Preparation and Submission of NSF Applications via Grants.gov guidelines apply (Note: The NSF Grants.gov Application Guide is available on the Grants.gov website and on the NSF website at: https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=grantsgovguide ).

B. Budgetary Information

Inclusion of voluntary committed cost sharing is prohibited.

Not Applicable

Other budgetary limitations apply. Please see the full text of this solicitation for further information.

C. Due Dates

Proposal review information criteria.

Merit Review Criteria:

National Science Board approved criteria. Additional merit review criteria apply. Please see the full text of this solicitation for further information.

Award Administration Information

Award Conditions:

Additional award conditions apply. Please see the full text of this solicitation for further information.

Reporting Requirements:

Additional reporting requirements apply. Please see the full text of this solicitation for further information.

I. Introduction

The scientific research community increasingly requires infrastructure that is too complex and costly for a single organization to procure, utilize and maintain. With its Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) program and Major Multi-user Facilities, NSF is able to support instrumentation/infrastructure projects across the Foundation at the lower end and the higher end of the spectrum of infrastructure costs. The Mid-scale Research Infrastructure program is intended to provide NSF with an agile, Foundation-wide process to fund implementation of research capabilities in the mid-scale range between MRI and Major Multi-user Facilities.

The National Science Board report responding to Congress, "Bridging the Gap: Building a Sustained Approach to Mid-scale Research Infrastructure and Cyberinfrastructure at NSF 1 ", highlights that:

"The research community has identified mid-scale research infrastructure as a key enabler of scientific advances on shorter timescales than required for the larger projects funded within the MREFC (Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction) account. Mid-scale research infrastructure can also provide the foundations for new innovative large infrastructure, and, in the process, train early-career researchers in the development, design, construction, and effective use of cutting-edge infrastructure. Likewise, cyberinfrastructure (CI) is key to solving the challenges of collecting, processing, and distributing the big data so prevalent in today's science and engineering endeavors. Infrastructure investments at the required mid-level can also help maintain the United States' standing among global partners and competitors." The NSB Report recommends that NSF should sustain a mid-scale infrastructure program, noting that many mid- scale projects have potential for high scientific impact and have a level of community support as indicated by National Academies reports, directorate strategic plans and/or other advisory groups. Mid-scale RI-1 is complemented by a separate mid-scale activity, Mid-scale RI-2, that supports projects with a total cost ranging from $20 million to below the threshold for a Major Facility Project, currently $100 million.

1 https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2018/NSB-2018-40-Midscale-Research-Infrastructure-Report-to-Congress-Oct2018.pdf .

II. Program Description

This solicitation calls for Mid-scale RI-1 projects from $4 million up to but not including $20 million in total project costs for implementation projects and $400,000 up to but not including $20 million for design activities. These funding ranges will support a variety of activities to design or projects to implement visionary and unique infrastructure with high-priority and broad impact as identified by research communities in the United States. Mid-scale RI-1 is not intended to enhance projects with a campus-centric focus.

The goal of Mid-scale RI-1 is the fulfillment of a research community-defined need that enables current and next-generation U.S. researchers to be competitive in a global research environment. In order to solve the most pressing scientific and societal problems of the day (such as those called out in National Academies reports and decadal surveys, identified through research community planning and prioritizing exercises, or called out as other national priorities), the use of new technologies, techniques, and concepts is encouraged in this competition. Mid-scale RI-1 focuses on innovative, potentially transformative projects. The scientific justification should demonstrate how the proposed infrastructure provides more advanced research capabilities relative to what is generally available to the general U.S. research community; investigators whose preliminary proposals are for capabilities similar to those currently available to the U.S. research community are unlikely to be invited to submit full proposals. With the exception of design awards, infrastructure acquired or developed with support from the Mid-scale RI-1 Program is expected to be operational by the end of the award period to enable the research for which the infrastructure was proposed.

All proposals should show the project's value and benefit to the U.S. science community. Examples of benefit include, but are not limited to, new and unique research capability, broad access to research infrastructure, dedicated community observing time on the infrastructure, access to unique data products and software, and cooperation and sharing of technology with other projects. Proposals for infrastructure that are part of a larger project must clearly state the impact of the proposed infrastructure on the project and the benefit to the U.S. research communities that NSF supports.

Mid-scale projects represent opportunities to expand participation in instrument/infrastructure design and implementation within STEM fields and train not only the next generation of users, but also the creators of cutting-edge new capabilities in science, engineering and technology. As such, student training and involvement of a diverse workforce in mid-scale infrastructure development, implementation and/or associated data management processes are expected. To maximize the impact of Mid-scale RI-1 investments, proposals must not only focus on innovative, potentially transformative research infrastructure, but also on the opportunities the project's design or implementation presents to expand diversity and student training in all aspects of the project.

Strong project management and robust cost estimation will be emphasized in the Mid-scale RI-1 proposal review, particularly for more costly or complex projects. Proposers are strongly encouraged to account for all foreseeable costs in the project budget, including adequate plans for risk mitigation.

Prior to making a funding decision, NSF is required to ensure compliance with applicable federal environmental laws and regulations such as the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and the Endangered Species Act (ESA). For example, these statutes require NSF to consider the potential impacts of activities associated with proposals under consideration for NSF funding on a broad range of environmental resources (NEPA), significant historic properties (NHPA), and endangered and/or threatened species (ESA). To assist NSF in determining which environmental statutes may apply and what level of environmental review may be appropriate, preliminary proposals (and if applicable full proposals) should indicate whether activities are anticipated to impact the natural or cultural environment, especially those involving renovation, construction, or major fixed equipment installation. In order to support NSF's federal environmental review and compliance obligations, additional information may be requested from the PI. For projects that are invited to submit full proposals, an Environmental Checklist must be provided as a Single Copy Document. Details are provided under the Full Proposal Preparation section in this Solicitation.

Projects with an international component may be submitted to the Mid-scale RI-1 Program in accordance with the Program's eligibility requirements and applicable provisions found in the PAPPG. International projects typically involve partnering a U.S. project with one or more international collaborators in a specific institution or organization. Successful international projects include (1) true intellectual collaboration with a foreign partner and (2) benefits that are realized from the expertise, specialized skills, capabilities, phenomena, or other resources that the foreign collaborator or research environment provides.

Examples of projects that may be supported by Mid-scale RI-1 include, but are not limited to, infrastructure that supports high-priority research experiments or campaigns, major cyberinfrastructure that addresses community and national-scale computational and data-intensive science and engineering research, major shared community infrastructure and resources as may be required to enable community-scale research and upgrades and/or major new infrastructure for existing facilities.

All Mid-scale RI-1 proposals should describe the types of research for which the infrastructure will be used, the benefit to the U.S. research communities that NSF supports, and the other broader impacts of the project. Proposals for infrastructure that are part of a larger project must clearly state the impact of the proposed infrastructure on the project, and whether and how any specific part(s) of the infrastructure would be identified with NSF. However, the specific research projects for which the infrastructure will be used need not be funded by NSF or the Federal government.

The Mid-scale RI-1 program will not support projects that include the following:

• Science or engineering research (except for validation of operational capability as appropriate for implementation projects);
• Post-implementation research, operations, or maintenance (O&M);
• Education and outreach activities other than student training in the implementation or design of state-of-the-art research infrastructure;
• Projects with total project costs outside this solicitation's budgetary limits, either during initial submission or identified during subsequent review and NSF cost analyses;
• General-purpose buildings, support systems and equipment that are not directly required for the implementation and eventual operation of the proposed infrastructure and/or that support multi-purpose usage in addition to research;
• Infrastructure that is primarily at the regional, campus or local scale;
• Multiple pieces of infrastructure/instrumentation that are grouped together, either within a single campus or for a collection of consortium or campus labs, to meet the minimum Total Project Cost but would not be widely recognized as a single, well-integrated entity that addresses documented national research priorities;
• Other organized activities, such as research centers, that are not consistent with the definition of NSF mid-scale research infrastructure provided in this solicitation; or
• Continuation or renewal of projects funded by the Mid-scale RI-1 program.

Mid-scale RI-1 proposals seeking such support are subject to return without review if noncompliance with any of the above bulleted items is established prior to review, or declination if noncompliance is established as a result of merit review.

Guidance on Proposals for Research Cyberinfrastructure Projects: The Mid-scale RI-1 program will consider proposals for research cyberinfrastructure (CI) projects that aim to significantly enable new science and engineering research at national and international scales. Such research CI proposals must be strongly driven by the identified research needs of one or more science and engineering communities supported by NSF, advance the Nation's holistic research cyberinfrastructure ecosystem, and comprise innovative technical and operational objectives. Proposals that specifically focus narrowly on data storage or seek to support broadly provisioned high-performance computing resources will not be supported by the Mid-scale RI-1 program. Prospective principal investigators (PIs) with questions should contact the Mid-scale RI-1 program team as listed on the Mid-scale RI-1 website .

To organize the diverse range of projects expected across the research areas supported by NSF, with differing project types and costs, Mid-scale RI-1 proposals are divided into the following two categories. Specification of the project type should appear in the proposal title (see Section V.A).

1. Mid-scale RI-1: Implementation Projects (M1:IP) (e.g., Acquisition, Assembly, Construction and Commissioning)

The infrastructure resulting from implementation projects may be a) such as to enable well-defined, limited-term research experiments with broad community buy-in and shared data resources and/or b) shared-use, mid-scale infrastructure for broad community use. M1:IP provides for acquiring, assembling, constructing and commissioning mid-scale infrastructure e.g., at labs, facilities or in the field, but does not support the construction or operations of labs/facilities or the science or operations undertaken with the infrastructure.

Operations and maintenance costs are discussed below.

2. Mid-scale RI-1: Design Activities (M1:DA).

Design activities are intended to prepare for the implementation of future mid-scale range projects. Only M1:DA activities may ask for less than $4 million. The minimum M1:DA budget request is $400,000, with the upper request for M1:DA being the maximum allowable Mid-scale RI-1 request up to but not including $20 million as needed to prepare for a future mid-scale range implementation project. While Mid-scale RI-1 will not support early phase Research and Development to addresses technological issues that are appropriate for funding through regular research programs, the program may consider prototypes on a case-by-case basis. Successful award of a Mid-scale RI-1 design activity does not imply NSF's commitment to future implementation of that project, and hence the acquisition or development of long-lead items will not be considered as part of design activities. Projects supported through the M1:DA track that elect to submit to future NSF competitions for implementation will be competing against all other proposals in any competition.

The distribution of awards between the design and implementation categories will depend on the numbers and quality of the proposals received.

The Mid-scale RI-1 Program does not provide operating or maintenance funds for projects it supports through this solicitation. However, to inform NSF directorates and divisions of potential future O&M obligations, both preliminary and full proposals must describe viable plans for post-implementation O&M for any planned infrastructure.

Mid-scale RI is expected to serve a wide community and lead to readily available public access to data. Mid-scale RI-1 investments are expected to fill gaps in the Nation's infrastructure and demonstrate high potential to significantly advance the Nation's research capabilities.

Proposals are expected to be funded for five years, commensurate with the scope of the project.

III. Award Information

Awards may be in the form of a standard grant, a continuing grant or a cooperative agreement, depending on the complexity of the project and the extent of government involvement. NSF reserves the right to undertake pre-award cost, schedule, management and environmental reviews as part of the review of a proposed project. Monthly and quarterly reports may be part of NSF's post-award monitoring process.

The minimum proposal budget for M1:IP projects is $4 million, with the maximum proposal budget for the full award duration being up to but not including $20 million. Only M1:DA projects may request less than $4 million, with a minimum request of $400,000 and a maximum request up to but not including $20 million, as needed to prepare for a future mid-scale class implementation project.

Estimated program budget, number of awards and average award size are subject to the availability of funds and quality of proposals.

The earliest expected start date is October 01 of the second fiscal year of each competition.

IV. Eligibility Information

V. proposal preparation and submission instructions.

Preliminary Proposals (required) : Preliminary proposals are required and must be submitted via Research.gov, even if full proposals will be submitted via Grants.gov.

Preliminary Proposal Set-Up: Select "Prepare New Preliminary Proposal" in Research.gov. Search for and select this solicitation title in Step One of the Preliminary Proposal wizard. Select "Single proposal (with or without sub-awards)". Separately submitted collaborative proposals will be returned without review. (Funding to partner institutions must be through sub-awards)

Please note that even though proposals will be directed to the Office of Integrative Activities, once received the proposals will be managed by a cross-disciplinary team of NSF Program Directors. When submitted, proposals will first reside in the Office of Integrative Activities which coordinates the Mid-scale RI-1 Program in partnership with NSF Directorates.

Preliminary Proposal Contents

The preliminary proposal must consist of the following elements/sections:

1. Title: The project title must be concise and include the primary Mid-scale RI-1 purpose (Implementation Project, IP; Design Activity, DA) of the proposal, e.g., "Mid-scale RI-1 (M1:IP): TITLE" or "Mid-scale RI-1 (M1:DA): TITLE". Consortium projects must also be identified in the title. (Note: By selecting "Research Infrastructure" as the proposal type in Research.gov, your proposal is prepended by with "Research Infrastructure". This is an acceptable addition to the title format given above.)

2. Cover Sheet: For planning purposes the earliest expected start date is October 01 of the second fiscal year of each competition.

3. Senior/Key Personnel: NSF proposals identify only a single PI and up to four co-PIs with those titles. Other major participants may be designated as "Other Senior/Key personnel."

4. Project Summary: In addition to the guidance in the NSF PAPPG, the first line of the Project Summary should list the most relevant Directorate(s)/Division(s) for review of the proposal. NSF reserves the right to assign proposals to Directorate/(s)Division(s) that are deemed to be the most appropriate for review. PI selection of a Directorate/(s)Division(s) for review is advisory to NSF.

5. Project Description (10-pages maximum):

• A first stand-alone sentence must designate which category (Implementation or Design) of Mid-scale RI-1 is most appropriate for this proposal.
• Any project-related activities that are anticipated to have significant environmental and/or cultural impacts should be noted at the beginning of the Project Description.
• Describe the Scientific Justification, including the priority research capabilities relative to what is generally available to the U.S. research community and its potential to significantly advance the Nation's research capabilities.
• Include a discussion that explains how the requested infrastructure will fulfill a community-defined need and how that need was identified, for example, by reference to National Academies reports or decadal surveys, identified through research community planning and prioritizing exercises, or called out as other national priorities. The benefits should include enabling current and next-generation U.S.-based researchers to be more competitive in a global research environment. As appropriate, describe how the proposed infrastructure responds to identified high priority needs of a research community using new technologies, techniques, and concepts. Describe how the proposed infrastructure is innovative and/or potentially transformative.
• Within the required Broader Impacts section, include a discussion of opportunities for student training, increased participation of persons from groups under-represented in STEM and a description of tangible benefits to the wider U.S. research community (access, data products, technology, etc.). Student training and the involvement of a diverse STEM workforce should be apparent in all aspects of mid-scale design activities or implementation projects. Please note this section must include a separate section header labeled Broader Impacts and the heading must be on its own line with no other text on that line.
• Institutional commitment to creating a supportive working environment - Using no more than one paragraph, describe indicators of institutional commitment to promoting a supportive working environment within the participating institutions, including grants obtained for those efforts. As examples, if one or more institutional members of the project have a SEA Change Institutional Award ( https://seachange.aaas.org/ ), description of the award(s) could be provided; if an institution has or had an ADVANCE Institutional Transformation grant ( https://new.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/advance-organizational-change-gender-equity-stem ), its impact could be summarized. if nothing similar to the above applies, other institution-wide activities sponsored by the leadership of the institution could be described.
• Although not funded by Mid-scale RI-1, preliminary proposals must include an outline of planned operations and maintenance support, especially an estimate of any planned needs for ongoing, NSF-supported operations and maintenance that may be requested outside of the Mid-scale RI Program.
• Note: Results from Prior NSF Support should not be included. Also, URLs may not be used.
• Proposals with an international dimension should include a description of the foreign collaborator's role in the project. Biographical Sketches for foreign collaborators and letters of commitment from foreign institutions or organizations should be included as supplemental documents to ensure commitment to the collaboration.

6. References Cited

7. Senior/Key Personnel Documents: The following information must be provided for all individuals designated as Senior/Key Personnel, including the PI, all co-PIs, and any additional senior/key personnel at all participating organizations.

• Biographical Sketches
• Collaborators & Other Affiliations (COA) Information

8. Budget and Budget Justification: Budgets for preliminary proposals, including budgets for any sub-awards, may be estimates but must be justified with a Basis of Estimates (BoE) included, and must be well thought out. Copies of vendor quotations, however, should not be included in preliminary proposals. If the budget includes contingency, that contingency must cover known risks and be appropriate for risk mitigation. (Contingency should be listed on Line G.6 (Other) on the Budget Pages.) Note: PIs are advised to carefully consider budgets near the Mid-scale RI-1 limits; if a full proposal should be invited, refinements of project costs may result in a budget outside of Mid-scale RI-1 solicitation budget ranges, and result in an invited full proposal being ineligible and subject to decline or return without further review.

9. Facilities, Equipment, and Other Resources

10. Supplementary Documents (to be entered in the Other Supplementary Documents section of Research.gov):

• List of all project personnel, organized alphabetically who have a role in the project. Use the following format: last name, first name, middle initial, institution/organization.
• A separate list, in alphabetical order, of all institutions and organizations with which project personnel are affiliated. Designate for each an appropriate category: Institution of Higher Education, National Laboratory, Federal Government, Industry, Non-Governmental Organization, State/Local Government, or international organization.

For implementation projects, an initial version of the Project Execution Plan (PEP). The PEP documents how the project is managed by the Recipient and is described in the RIG, available at https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/lfo/lfo_documents.jsp . While the PEP is not expected to be fully developed at the preliminary proposal stage, it should contain sufficient discussion in each relevant PEP section to demonstrate that the project team has an understanding of the complexity of project management. Greater PEP detail will be required in invited full proposals. The latest template for a Mid-scale RI PEP will be posted at https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/lfo/lfo_documents.jsp .

11. Information to be submitted to NSF via the Single Copy Documents Section (seen only by NSF staff)

• Proprietary or privileged information (if applicable). Any available, relevant environmental reports and/or documentation (e.g., permits, authorizations, etc.), if applicable, should be submitted in the Single Copy Document section.
• List of suggested reviewers or reviewers not to include (with a brief explanation or justification for why the reviewer should be excluded).

12. Required Information to be submitted to NSF via email.

In addition to their submission in the supplementary documents section of the proposal, the proposer is required to send by email a spreadsheet version of items 10.a. and 10.b.--lists of all personnel and participating organizations--in the form of an Excel two tab spreadsheet via email to [email protected] . These lists must be sent immediately after the proposal is submitted and the email acknowledging receipt, including the proposal ID number, is received. The email subject line should be the principal investigator's last name followed by the proposal number. The Excel spreadsheet should be named in the same way (principal investigator's last name followed by the proposal number).

Full Proposal Preparation Instructions : Proposers may opt to submit proposals in response to this Program Solicitation via Research.gov, or Grants.gov.

• Full Proposals submitted via Research.gov: Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation should be prepared and submitted in accordance with the general guidelines contained in the NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG). The complete text of the PAPPG is available electronically on the NSF website at: https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg . Paper copies of the PAPPG may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-8134 or by e-mail from [email protected] . The Prepare New Proposal setup will prompt you for the program solicitation number.
• Full proposals submitted via Grants.gov: Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation via Grants.gov should be prepared and submitted in accordance with the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide: A Guide for the Preparation and Submission of NSF Applications via Grants.gov . The complete text of the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide is available on the Grants.gov website and on the NSF website at: ( https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=grantsgovguide ). To obtain copies of the Application Guide and Application Forms Package, click on the Apply tab on the Grants.gov site, then click on the Apply Step 1: Download a Grant Application Package and Application Instructions link and enter the funding opportunity number, (the program solicitation number without the NSF prefix) and press the Download Package button. Paper copies of the Grants.gov Application Guide also may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-8134 or by e-mail from [email protected] .

See PAPPG Chapter II.D.2 for guidance on the required sections of a full research proposal submitted to NSF. Please note that the proposal preparation instructions provided in this program solicitation may deviate from the PAPPG instructions.

Full proposals should only be submitted if invited by NSF. Full proposal submissions without an invitation will be returned without review.

Proposal Set-Up: Select "Prepare New Full Proposal" in Research.gov. Search for and select this solicitation title in Step One of the Full Proposal wizard. Select "Research Infrastructure" as the proposal type. In the proposal details section, select "Single proposal (with or without sub-awards)". Separately submitted collaborative proposals will be returned without review. (Funding to partner institutions must be through sub-awards)

Please note that even though proposals will be directed to the Office of Integrative Activities, once received the proposals will be managed by a cross-disciplinary team of NSF Program Directors within the directorates. When submitted, proposals will first reside in the Office of Integrative Activities which coordinates the Mid-scale RI-1 Program in partnership with NSF Directorates.

Full proposals for implementation projects must provide more detail than the preliminary proposal and include a detailed project execution plan (PEP) that clearly describes the management of the project within the "Construction Project Definition" section of the PEP. Full proposals for design activities must provide more detail than the preliminary proposal and include a detailed design execution plan (DEP) that clearly describes the work to be conducted as part of the design effort and how that work will be managed.

Every effort should be made to update information that was provided in the preliminary proposal and to fully address issues raised in the preliminary proposal review. The budget and scope of the project are likely to be refined in the full proposal, but the revised budget must not lie outside the limits of the Mid-scale RI-1 Program.

The following instructions supplement the guidance in the PAPPG or NSF Grants.gov Application Guide. Additional instructions for full proposals may be provided in letters of invitation to submit full proposals.

1. Title: The project title must be concise and include the primary Mid-scale RI-1 purpose (Implementation Project, IP; Design Activity, DA) of the proposal, e.g., "Mid-scale RI-1 (M1:IP): TITLE" or "Mid-scale RI-1 (M1:DA): TITLE". Consortium projects must also be identified in the title. (Note that Research.gov will prepend the title with "Research Infrastructure:" when the proposal type has been selected correctly).

2. Cover Sheet: For planning purposes the earliest expected start date is October 01 of the second fiscal year of each competition. Include the Preliminary Proposal number, in the format 25XXXXX, 26XXXXX, etc. as assigned by Research.gov when it was submitted.

3. Senior/Key Personnel: NSF proposals identify only a single PI and up to four co-PIs with those titles. Other major participants may be designated as "Other Senior/Key Personnel."

4. Project Summary: See instructions for Preliminary Proposals. The first line of the Project Summary should list the most relevant Directorate(s)/Division(s) for review of the proposal. NSF reserves the right to assign proposals to Directorate(s)/Division(s) that are deemed to be the most appropriate for review. PI selection of a Directorate(s)/Division(s) for review is advisory to NSF.

5. Project Description (page limit is 20 pages unless otherwise specified in the invitation letter): This section must include components listed below.

• Results from Prior NSF Support. Note that this requirement applies to the PI and all co-PIs. When appropriate, focus on awards including infrastructure or infrastructure management-related activities.
• Describe the Scientific Justification. Describe the potential for addressing one or more identified high-priority science goals within the relevant research community, the potential for advancing scientific discovery and the potential to significantly advance the Nation's research capabilities. Describe how the proposed infrastructure is innovative and/or potentially transformative. Explain the unique research capabilities and lack of general availability of the proposed mid-scale infrastructure. The scientific justification should demonstrate how the proposed infrastructure provides unique research capability relative to what is currently available to the general U.S. research community.
• Include a description of the tangible benefits the proposed infrastructure will have to the wider U.S. research community explaining how it will fulfill a community-defined need and how that need was identified, for example, by reference to National Academies reports or decadal surveys, identified through research community planning and prioritizing exercises, or called out as other national priorities. The benefits should include enabling current and next-generation U.S.-based researchers to be competitive in a global research environment. As appropriate, describe how the proposed infrastructure responds to identified high-priority needs of a research community using new technologies, techniques, and concepts.
• Preliminary Activities Accomplished: For Implementation projects, include a description of any preliminary activities that have already occurred and that have prepared the path for implementation, for example, identification of the primary scientific, technical and system performance requirements, and associated designs and specifications. For all proposals in which preliminary planning/design documents are available, include them as part of the Other Supplementary Documents section. For design activities, include a description of any preliminary designs/workshops/etc. that have been undertaken, summarizing the output(s) from these efforts as part of the Other Supplementary Documents section.
• Implementation Plan: This section, elements of which will appear in the PEP or DEP, should include a summary of the technical readiness and planned project management, including how the project will be implemented by the project team. An organizational chart and a summary of key personnel and their roles should be included.
• Operations and Utilization Plan: For Implementation projects, discuss the overall plan for operating the infrastructure including as a minimum a) management/governance plans, b) strategy for access and utilization of the infrastructure by the target research communities, and c) planned metrics and the process for evaluating the success and impact of the NSF investment in this infrastructure. This section must also identify the anticipated sources of operations and maintenance (O&M) funding, including any needs for ongoing NSF-supported operations and maintenance that may be requested outside of the Mid-scale RI-1 Program. Note that Mid-scale RI-1 does not fund post-implementation utilization and O&M, but reviewers and NSF need to understand how the infrastructure will be managed/supported over its lifetime.
• Broader Impacts: Include a section discussing the anticipated Broader Impacts (see Section VI below for examples of Broader Impacts). This section must be under a separate header labeled "Broader Impacts", on its own line with no other text on that line. At a minimum, this section should include how the project will advance student training and develop leveling strategies to create opportunities for all to include the increase in the participation of underrepresented groups (including, for example, veterans and those with disabilities). Mid-scale projects are ideal opportunities for increasing diversity among the designers, builders, implementers and users of STEM instrumentation and infrastructure projects, training the next generation of leaders in engineering, science and technology and the creators of cutting-edge new research capabilities. As such, inclusion of a diverse pool of students in meaningful mid-scale development and/or associated data management training is expected.
• Divestment. Mid-scale RI-1 implementation full proposals should also include a brief discussion of how the infrastructure will be decommissioned, the strategy for eventual disposal of the infrastructure and plans for close out of the project.
• Proposals with an international dimension should include a description of each foreign collaborator's role in the project. Biographical Sketches for foreign collaborators and letters of collaboration from foreign institutions or organizations should be included as Other Supplementary Documents to ensure commitment to the collaboration.

6. Budget and Budget Justification, including budgets for any sub-awards: Mid-scale RI-1 budgets should be supported by the four characteristics of a high-quality estimate: 1) well-documented; 2) comprehensive; 3) accurate; and 4) credible (see the RIG). Project schedules should be developed following the best program management practices. If the budget includes contingency, that contingency must cover known risks and be appropriate for risk mitigation. (Contingency should be listed on Line G.6 (Other) on the Budget Pages.) All budgets will go through a cost analysis and should be accompanied by costs appropriately broken down into work breakdown structure (WBS) and rolled up into the NSF budget form. Note: PIs are advised to carefully consider budgets near the Mid-scale RI-1 limits; if a full proposal should be invited, refinements of project costs may result in a budget outside of Mid-scale RI-1 solicitation budget ranges, and result in an invited full proposal being ineligible and declined or subject to return without further review.

Additional guidance on the budget may be provided in a letter of invitation to submit a full proposal.

7. Supplementary Documents: In addition to the requirements contained in the PAPPG, the following items must be included as Supplementary Documents:

• For all proposals , provide a list of all project personnel, organized alphabetically who have a role in the project. Use the following format: last name, first name, middle initial, institution/organization. Use the template provided here .
• For all proposals , provide a separate list, in alphabetical order, of all institutions and organizations with which project personnel are affiliated. Designate for each an appropriate category: Institution of Higher Education, National Laboratory, Federal Government, Industry, Non-Governmental Organization, State/Local Government, or International organization. Use the template provided at the following link: https://new.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/mid-scale-research-infrastructure-1-mid-scale-ri-1/announcements/94896 .

The latest template for the Mid-scale RI PEP format for this competition is posted at https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/lfo/lfo_documents.jsp . Please consult NSF's Research Infrastructure Guide, applicable at the time of proposal submission, for information specific to Mid-scale Project Execution Plans. The PEP or DEP should be scaled for the complexity of the project and may not require all of the elements described in the RIG.

• For all proposals , include a letter documenting the performing organization's commitment to ensuring successful operations and maintenance over the expected lifetime of the infrastructure. Proposals for infrastructure to be located at an organization other than the performing organization must provide an additional (one-page maximum) supplementary document stating the host organization's commitment to house the infrastructure.

To: NSF Mid-scale RI-1 Coordinators

Subject: Statement of Collaboration

By signing below I acknowledge that I am listed as a collaborator on this Mid-scale RI proposal, entitled " (proposal title) ," with (PI name) as the Principal Investigator. I agree to undertake the tasks assigned to me, as described in the proposal, and I commit to provide or make available the resources therein designated to me.

Signed: (Print Name):

The proposal body itself should describe the nature and need for a collaboration and/or describe the major users and their need for the infrastructure. Statements of collaboration by individuals beyond that specified above, including letters of support/endorsement, are not allowed. Each statement must be signed by the designated collaborator/user. PI requests to collaborators for these statements should be made well in advance of the proposal submission deadline since, if they are to be included, they must be included at the time of the proposal submission.

• For all implementation proposals , vendor quotations for major components must be included as Other Supplementary Documents for full proposals only. Inclusion of representative, itemized vendor quotations is required for full Mid- scale RI-1 proposals. Although a proposal might reference and have a quote(s) for a specific make and model, the proposer is reminded that his/her organization's approved procurement processes must be utilized in the event of an award to establish the appropriate item(s) to be purchased and that applicable procurement standards for institutions of higher education and other non-profit organizations are described in 2 CFR 215.40-48.
• When applicable , if any designs of the proposed infrastructure are available, they should be included or described as appropriate.

No other items or appendices are to be included unless expressly allowed in the invitation to submit a full proposal. Full proposals containing items other than those allowed above are subject to return without review.

8. Single Copy Documents Section (seen only by NSF staff)

• As appropriate: PIs proposing infrastructure intended for use in the Antarctic are required to consult with the NSF Office of Polar Programs (OPP) to discuss the timing and feasibility of their project. For projects requiring logistical support in the Arctic region, please consult with the NSF Arctic Research Support and Logistics (RSL) Program to discuss any support requirements (see: https://www.nsf.gov/geo/opp/arctic/res_log_sup.jsp ). Documentation in the form of email correspondence must be provided as a Single Copy Document. Failure to do so may result in a proposal being returned without review.
• NSF is required to comply with applicable federal environmental laws and regulations such as the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and the Endangered Species Act (ESA). To assist NSF in determining which environmental statutes may apply and what level of environmental review may be appropriate, all invited full proposals must indicate whether activities are anticipated to impact the natural or cultural environment, especially those involving renovation, construction, or major fixed equipment installation. In order to support NSF's federal environmental review and compliance obligations, all projects that are invited to submit full proposals will be required to submit, as a Single Copy Document, an Environmental Checklist to be available through a link in the Full Proposal invitation letter.

9. Required Information to be submitted to NSF via email.

In addition to their submission in the supplementary documents section of the proposal, the proposer is required to send a spreadsheet version of items 7.a. and 7.b. lists of all personnel and participating organizations--in form of an Excel two tab spreadsheet via email to [email protected] . These lists must be sent immediately after the proposal is submitted. The email subject line should be principal investigator's last name followed by the proposal number. The Excel spreadsheet should be named the same (principal investigator's last name followed by the proposal number).

Cost Sharing:

Other Budgetary Limitations:

Implementation projects may have a total project cost ranging from $4 million up to but not including $20 million. Design activities may request less than $4 million, with a minimum request of $400,000 and a maximum request up to but not including $20 million.

Budget Preparation Instructions:

A breakdown of Mid-scale RI-1 implementation or design components and their expected costs must be included in the Budget Justification. For preliminary proposals, the cost estimates may themselves be preliminary, but well thought through, with basis of estimates included. Budgets in invited full proposals must be robust and be supported by the four characteristics of a high-quality estimate: 1) well-documented; 2) comprehensive; 3) accurate; and 4) credible (see the RIG). In both preliminary and invited full proposals, the budgets must fall within the limits of the Mid-scale RI-1 program.

Prior to any award, invited implementation or design full proposals will be subject to NSF cost analyses. If the final estimated costs fall outside of Mid-scale RI-1 budgetary limits, a proposal is subject to return and will not be funded.

D. Research.gov/Grants.gov Requirements

For Proposals Submitted Via Research.gov:

To prepare and submit a proposal via Research.gov, see detailed technical instructions available at: https://www.research.gov/research-portal/appmanager/base/desktop?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=research_node_display&_nodePath=/researchGov/Service/Desktop/ProposalPreparationandSubmission.html . For Research.gov user support, call the Research.gov Help Desk at 1-800-381-1532 or e-mail [email protected] . The Research.gov Help Desk answers general technical questions related to the use of the Research.gov system. Specific questions related to this program solicitation should be referred to the NSF program staff contact(s) listed in Section VIII of this funding opportunity.

For Proposals Submitted Via Grants.gov:

Before using Grants.gov for the first time, each organization must register to create an institutional profile. Once registered, the applicant's organization can then apply for any federal grant on the Grants.gov website. Comprehensive information about using Grants.gov is available on the Grants.gov Applicant Resources web page.: https://www.grants.gov/applicants . In addition, the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide (see link in Section V.A) provides instructions regarding the technical preparation of proposals via Grants.gov. For Grants.gov user support, contact the Grants.gov Contact Center at 1-800-518-4726 or by email: [email protected] . The Grants.gov Contact Center answers general technical questions related to the use of Grants.gov. Specific questions related to this program solicitation should be referred to the NSF program staff contact(s) listed in Section VIII of this solicitation. Submitting the Proposal: Once all documents have been completed, the Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) must submit the application to Grants.gov and verify the desired funding opportunity and agency to which the application is submitted. The AOR must then sign and submit the application to Grants.gov. The completed application will be transferred to Research.gov for further processing. The NSF Grants.gov Proposal Processing in Research.gov informational page provides submission guidance to applicants and links to helpful resources including the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide , Grants.gov Proposal Processing in Research.gov how-to guide , and Grants.gov Submitted Proposals Frequently Asked Questions . Grants.gov proposals must pass all NSF pre-check and post-check validations in order to be accepted by Research.gov at NSF. When submitting via Grants.gov, NSF strongly recommends applicants initiate proposal submission at least five business days in advance of a deadline to allow adequate time to address NSF compliance errors and resubmissions by 5:00 p.m. submitting organization's local time on the deadline. Please note that some errors cannot be corrected in Grants.gov. Once a proposal passes pre-checks but fails any post-check, an applicant can only correct and submit the in-progress proposal in Research.gov.

Proposers that submitted via Research.gov may use Research.gov to verify the status of their submission to NSF. For proposers that submitted via Grants.gov, until an application has been received and validated by NSF, the Authorized Organizational Representative may check the status of an application on Grants.gov. After proposers have received an e-mail notification from NSF, Research.gov should be used to check the status of an application.

VI. NSF Proposal Processing And Review Procedures

Proposals received by NSF are assigned to the appropriate NSF program for acknowledgment and, if they meet NSF requirements, for review. All proposals are carefully reviewed by a scientist, engineer, or educator serving as an NSF Program Officer, and usually by three to ten other persons outside NSF either as ad hoc reviewers, panelists, or both, who are experts in the particular fields represented by the proposal. These reviewers are selected by Program Officers charged with oversight of the review process. Proposers are invited to suggest names of persons they believe are especially well qualified to review the proposal and/or persons they would prefer not review the proposal. These suggestions may serve as one source in the reviewer selection process at the Program Officer's discretion. Submission of such names, however, is optional. Care is taken to ensure that reviewers have no conflicts of interest with the proposal. In addition, Program Officers may obtain comments from site visits before recommending final action on proposals. Senior NSF staff further review recommendations for awards. A flowchart that depicts the entire NSF proposal and award process (and associated timeline) is included in PAPPG Exhibit III-1.

A comprehensive description of the Foundation's merit review process is available on the NSF website at: https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/merit_review/ .

Proposers should also be aware of core strategies that are essential to the fulfillment of NSF's mission, as articulated in Leading the World in Discovery and Innovation, STEM Talent Development and the Delivery of Benefits from Research - NSF Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years (FY) 2022 - 2026 . These strategies are integrated in the program planning and implementation process, of which proposal review is one part. NSF's mission is particularly well-implemented through the integration of research and education and broadening participation in NSF programs, projects, and activities.

One of the strategic objectives in support of NSF's mission is to foster integration of research and education through the programs, projects, and activities it supports at academic and research institutions. These institutions must recruit, train, and prepare a diverse STEM workforce to advance the frontiers of science and participate in the U.S. technology-based economy. NSF's contribution to the national innovation ecosystem is to provide cutting-edge research under the guidance of the Nation's most creative scientists and engineers. NSF also supports development of a strong science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce by investing in building the knowledge that informs improvements in STEM teaching and learning.

NSF's mission calls for the broadening of opportunities and expanding participation of groups, institutions, and geographic regions that are underrepresented in STEM disciplines, which is essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering. NSF is committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects, and activities it considers and supports.

A. Merit Review Principles and Criteria

The National Science Foundation strives to invest in a robust and diverse portfolio of projects that creates new knowledge and enables breakthroughs in understanding across all areas of science and engineering research and education. To identify which projects to support, NSF relies on a merit review process that incorporates consideration of both the technical aspects of a proposed project and its potential to contribute more broadly to advancing NSF's mission "to promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense; and for other purposes." NSF makes every effort to conduct a fair, competitive, transparent merit review process for the selection of projects.

1. Merit Review Principles

These principles are to be given due diligence by PIs and organizations when preparing proposals and managing projects, by reviewers when reading and evaluating proposals, and by NSF program staff when determining whether or not to recommend proposals for funding and while overseeing awards. Given that NSF is the primary federal agency charged with nurturing and supporting excellence in basic research and education, the following three principles apply:

• All NSF projects should be of the highest quality and have the potential to advance, if not transform, the frontiers of knowledge.
• NSF projects, in the aggregate, should contribute more broadly to achieving societal goals. These "Broader Impacts" may be accomplished through the research itself, through activities that are directly related to specific research projects, or through activities that are supported by, but are complementary to, the project. The project activities may be based on previously established and/or innovative methods and approaches, but in either case must be well justified.
• Meaningful assessment and evaluation of NSF funded projects should be based on appropriate metrics, keeping in mind the likely correlation between the effect of broader impacts and the resources provided to implement projects. If the size of the activity is limited, evaluation of that activity in isolation is not likely to be meaningful. Thus, assessing the effectiveness of these activities may best be done at a higher, more aggregated, level than the individual project.

With respect to the third principle, even if assessment of Broader Impacts outcomes for particular projects is done at an aggregated level, PIs are expected to be accountable for carrying out the activities described in the funded project. Thus, individual projects should include clearly stated goals, specific descriptions of the activities that the PI intends to do, and a plan in place to document the outputs of those activities.

These three merit review principles provide the basis for the merit review criteria, as well as a context within which the users of the criteria can better understand their intent.

2. Merit Review Criteria

All NSF proposals are evaluated through use of the two National Science Board approved merit review criteria. In some instances, however, NSF will employ additional criteria as required to highlight the specific objectives of certain programs and activities.

The two merit review criteria are listed below. Both criteria are to be given full consideration during the review and decision-making processes; each criterion is necessary but neither, by itself, is sufficient. Therefore, proposers must fully address both criteria. (PAPPG Chapter II.D.2.d(i). contains additional information for use by proposers in development of the Project Description section of the proposal). Reviewers are strongly encouraged to review the criteria, including PAPPG Chapter II.D.2.d(i), prior to the review of a proposal.

When evaluating NSF proposals, reviewers will be asked to consider what the proposers want to do, why they want to do it, how they plan to do it, how they will know if they succeed, and what benefits could accrue if the project is successful. These issues apply both to the technical aspects of the proposal and the way in which the project may make broader contributions. To that end, reviewers will be asked to evaluate all proposals against two criteria:

• Intellectual Merit: The Intellectual Merit criterion encompasses the potential to advance knowledge; and
• Broader Impacts: The Broader Impacts criterion encompasses the potential to benefit society and contribute to the achievement of specific, desired societal outcomes.

The following elements should be considered in the review for both criteria:

• Advance knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields (Intellectual Merit); and
• Benefit society or advance desired societal outcomes (Broader Impacts)?
• To what extent do the proposed activities suggest and explore creative, original, or potentially transformative concepts?
• Is the plan for carrying out the proposed activities well-reasoned, well-organized, and based on a sound rationale? Does the plan incorporate a mechanism to assess success?
• How well qualified is the individual, team, or organization to conduct the proposed activities?
• Are there adequate resources available to the PI (either at the home organization or through collaborations) to carry out the proposed activities?

Broader impacts may be accomplished through the research itself, through the activities that are directly related to specific research projects, or through activities that are supported by, but are complementary to, the project. NSF values the advancement of scientific knowledge and activities that contribute to achievement of societally relevant outcomes. Such outcomes include, but are not limited to: full participation of women, persons with disabilities, and other underrepresented groups in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM); improved STEM education and educator development at any level; increased public scientific literacy and public engagement with science and technology; improved well-being of individuals in society; development of a diverse, globally competitive STEM workforce; increased partnerships between academia, industry, and others; improved national security; increased economic competitiveness of the United States; and enhanced infrastructure for research and education.

Proposers are reminded that reviewers will also be asked to review the Data Management and Sharing Plan and the Mentoring Plan, as appropriate.

Additional Solicitation Specific Review Criteria

The higher-level focus of the preliminary proposal review will be on the significance of the intended science uses of the proposed infrastructure, the importance and benefits of the proposed infrastructure to the wider community and the appropriateness of the team to undertake the project. Other elements of the project, including the training and mentoring of students and postdocs, creating opportunities for all, to include increasing the participation of persons from groups underrepresented in STEM, and plans for ongoing O&M after the commissioning of the infrastructure must also be addressed in the preliminary proposal. Evaluation of these plans will be part of the review. In addition to a more detailed review of these elements, the full proposal review will focus more fully on the project management, the process used to derive the cost estimates, and evaluation of plans to track and assess the value of the broader impacts of the project, including an increase in outreach and engagement to support the training and mentoring of students and postdocs and increasing the participation of persons from groups underrepresented in STEM.

• Reviews of both preliminary and invited full proposals will consider the scientific justification, including the science drivers and the unique research capabilities and lack of general availability of the requested infrastructure. A major consideration will be the project's potential to significantly advance the Nation's research infrastructure. For implementation projects, reviewers will also be asked to consider the completeness of the design activities that have led to the project being ready for mid-scale support.
• Reviews of both preliminary and invited full proposals will evaluate the research community priority of the infrastructure, i.e., evidence, such as workshop reports or other publicly available indicators, that the infrastructure is a priority for a research community. The value and benefit to the US research community will be evaluated. Examples of benefit include, but are not limited to, new research capability, broad access to research infrastructure, open-access observing time with the infrastructure, access to unique data products and software, and cooperation and sharing of technology with other projects.
• Reviews of both preliminary and invited full proposals will be evaluated on the strength and maturity of the plan to execute and manage the project including but not limited to project management methods, soundness of the cost estimate, feasibility of the schedule, and comprehensiveness of the risk management plan. Reviews will consider the appropriateness of the assembled team, including their qualifications, experience working in a team environment and potential to advance the goals of the project.
• For Implementation projects, a clear description of plans for continuing operations and maintenance must be provided and will be part of the review of both the preliminary and full proposals. Preliminary and invited full proposals will be evaluated on the strength of the anticipated life-cycle plans including utilization by, and anticipated impact on, the target U.S. research communities and the anticipated life-cycle costs. Statements of commitment (for full proposals only) from organizations that have agreed to participate as described in the proposal will be considered in the review.
• While preliminary proposals must address cost estimates, evaluation of the robustness of the budget estimates will be part of the review of the full proposal. Review of proposals that involve design of infrastructure will consider any available initial plans, likely costs and feasibility of the subsequent implementation of the proposed infrastructure.
• While preliminary proposals must address plans for student training, mentoring and broadening participation activities, review of full proposals will more fully evaluate plans for the involvement of a substantial component of student training and inclusion of a diverse workforce in instrumentation, infrastructure development, or data management/analysis. Evaluation of an assessment plan for these activities will also play a role in the proposal's review.

B. Review and Selection Process

Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation will be reviewed by Ad hoc Review and/or Panel Review, Internal NSF Review, or potential reverse site visits for complex projects.

Review Method:

• Panel Review
• Internal NSF Review
• Other: / and additional technical review, including site visits, for complex projects

Detailed Review Method Description

Preliminary proposals will be reviewed by NSF internally (with a waiver of external review) or using external reviews as appropriate for requirements in the Directorate in which the preliminary proposals are considered. The outcome will be an invite/do-not-invite decision for full proposals. Full proposals, to be submitted by invitation only, will be reviewed by external reviewers.

Reviewers will be asked to evaluate proposals using two National Science Board approved merit review criteria and, if applicable, additional program specific criteria. A summary rating and accompanying narrative will generally be completed and submitted by each reviewer and/or panel. The Program Officer assigned to manage the proposal's review will consider the advice of reviewers and will formulate a recommendation.

After scientific, technical and programmatic review and consideration of appropriate factors, the NSF Program Officer recommends to the cognizant Division Director whether the proposal should be declined or recommended for award. NSF strives to be able to tell proposers whether their proposals have been declined or recommended for funding within six months. Large or particularly complex proposals or proposals from new recipients may require additional review and processing time. The time interval begins on the deadline or target date, or receipt date, whichever is later. The interval ends when the Division Director acts upon the Program Officer's recommendation.

After programmatic approval has been obtained, the proposals recommended for funding will be forwarded to the Division of Grants and Agreements or the Division of Acquisition and Cooperative Support for review of business, financial, and policy implications. After an administrative review has occurred, Grants and Agreements Officers perform the processing and issuance of a grant or other agreement. Proposers are cautioned that only a Grants and Agreements Officer may make commitments, obligations or awards on behalf of NSF or authorize the expenditure of funds. No commitment on the part of NSF should be inferred from technical or budgetary discussions with a NSF Program Officer. A Principal Investigator or organization that makes financial or personnel commitments in the absence of a grant or cooperative agreement signed by the NSF Grants and Agreements Officer does so at their own risk.

Once an award or declination decision has been made, Principal Investigators are provided feedback about their proposals. In all cases, reviews are treated as confidential documents. Verbatim copies of reviews, excluding the names of the reviewers or any reviewer-identifying information, are sent to the Principal Investigator/Project Director by the Program Officer. In addition, the proposer will receive an explanation of the decision to award or decline funding.

VII. Award Administration Information

A. notification of the award.

Notification of the award is made to the submitting organization by an NSF Grants and Agreements Officer. Organizations whose proposals are declined will be advised as promptly as possible by the cognizant NSF Program administering the program. Verbatim copies of reviews, not including the identity of the reviewer, will be provided automatically to the Principal Investigator. (See Section VI.B. for additional information on the review process.)

B. Award Conditions

An NSF award consists of: (1) the award notice, which includes any special provisions applicable to the award and any numbered amendments thereto; (2) the budget, which indicates the amounts, by categories of expense, on which NSF has based its support (or otherwise communicates any specific approvals or disapprovals of proposed expenditures); (3) the proposal referenced in the award notice; (4) the applicable award conditions, such as Grant General Conditions (GC-1)*; or Research Terms and Conditions* and (5) any announcement or other NSF issuance that may be incorporated by reference in the award notice. Cooperative agreements also are administered in accordance with NSF Cooperative Agreement Financial and Administrative Terms and Conditions (CA-FATC) and the applicable Programmatic Terms and Conditions. NSF awards are electronically signed by an NSF Grants and Agreements Officer and transmitted electronically to the organization via e-mail.

*These documents may be accessed electronically on NSF's Website at https://www.nsf.gov/awards/managing/award_conditions.jsp?org=NSF . Paper copies may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-8134 or by e-mail from [email protected] .

More comprehensive information on NSF Award Conditions and other important information on the administration of NSF awards is contained in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) Chapter VII, available electronically on the NSF Website at https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg .

Administrative and National Policy Requirements

Build America, Buy America

As expressed in Executive Order 14005, Ensuring the Future is Made in All of America by All of America's Workers (86 FR 7475), it is the policy of the executive branch to use terms and conditions of Federal financial assistance awards to maximize, consistent with law, the use of goods, products, and materials produced in, and services offered in, the United States.

Consistent with the requirements of the Build America, Buy America Act (Pub. L. 117-58, Division G, Title IX, Subtitle A, November 15, 2021), no funding made available through this funding opportunity may be obligated for infrastructure projects under an award unless all iron, steel, manufactured products, and construction materials used in the project are produced in the United States. For additional information, visit NSF's Build America, Buy America web page.

Special Award Conditions:

Award recipients will be required to include appropriate acknowledgment of NSF support under the Mid-scale Research Infrastructure Program, by reference in publications and presentations, as well as by signage on any infrastructure supported by an award:

"This infrastructure is supported by the National Science Foundation Mid-scale Research Infrastructure Program under Award No. (Recipient enters NSF award number.)",

and in any publication (including World Wide Web pages) for any material based on or developed under the project, in the following terms:

"This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Mid-scale Research Infrastructure Program under Award No. (Recipient enters NSF award number.)".

Recipients also will be required to orally acknowledge NSF support using the language specified above during all news media interviews, including popular media such as radio, television and news magazines.

NSF may require in-person meetings, site visits, and periodic reviews depending on project scope. The award oversight will depend on project scope and complexity.

C. Reporting Requirements

For all multi-year grants (including both standard and continuing grants), the Principal Investigator must submit an annual project report to the cognizant Program Officer no later than 90 days prior to the end of the current budget period. (Some programs or awards require submission of more frequent project reports). No later than 120 days following expiration of a grant, the PI also is required to submit a final annual project report, and a project outcomes report for the general public.

Failure to provide the required annual or final annual project reports, or the project outcomes report, will delay NSF review and processing of any future funding increments as well as any pending proposals for all identified PIs and co-PIs on a given award. PIs should examine the formats of the required reports in advance to assure availability of required data.

PIs are required to use NSF's electronic project-reporting system, available through Research.gov, for preparation and submission of annual and final annual project reports. Such reports provide information on accomplishments, project participants (individual and organizational), publications, and other specific products and impacts of the project. Submission of the report via Research.gov constitutes certification by the PI that the contents of the report are accurate and complete. The project outcomes report also must be prepared and submitted using Research.gov. This report serves as a brief summary, prepared specifically for the public, of the nature and outcomes of the project. This report will be posted on the NSF website exactly as it is submitted by the PI.

More comprehensive information on NSF Reporting Requirements and other important information on the administration of NSF awards is contained in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) Chapter VII, available electronically on the NSF Website at https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg .

Monthly and quarterly reports may be part of NSF's post-award monitoring process. Additional reporting requirements, including possible reverse-/site visits to enable NSF oversight of the funded project may be required as part of the award terms and conditions. The level of oversight will be appropriate to the complexity of the award.

VIII. Agency Contacts

Please note that the program contact information is current at the time of publishing. See program website for any updates to the points of contact.

General inquiries regarding this program should be made to:

For questions related to the use of NSF systems contact:

• NSF Help Desk: 1-800-381-1532
• Research.gov Help Desk e-mail: [email protected]

For questions relating to Grants.gov contact:

• Grants.gov Contact Center: If the Authorized Organizational Representatives (AOR) has not received a confirmation message from Grants.gov within 48 hours of submission of application, please contact via telephone: 1-800-518-4726; e-mail: [email protected] .

Topic-specific Inquires:

For up-to-date Program contacts, see the Mid-scale RI-1 program website at https://new.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/mid-scale-research-infrastructure-1-mid-scale-ri-1 .

IX. Other Information

The NSF website provides the most comprehensive source of information on NSF Directorates (including contact information), programs and funding opportunities. Use of this website by potential proposers is strongly encouraged. In addition, "NSF Update" is an information-delivery system designed to keep potential proposers and other interested parties apprised of new NSF funding opportunities and publications, important changes in proposal and award policies and procedures, and upcoming NSF Grants Conferences . Subscribers are informed through e-mail or the user's Web browser each time new publications are issued that match their identified interests. "NSF Update" also is available on NSF's website .

Grants.gov provides an additional electronic capability to search for Federal government-wide grant opportunities. NSF funding opportunities may be accessed via this mechanism. Further information on Grants.gov may be obtained at https://www.grants.gov .

For the Mid-scale RI-2 program website, please click on https://new.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/mid-scale-research-infrastructure-2-mid-scale-ri-2 .

About The National Science Foundation

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent Federal agency created by the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended (42 USC 1861-75). The Act states the purpose of the NSF is "to promote the progress of science; [and] to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare by supporting research and education in all fields of science and engineering."

NSF funds research and education in most fields of science and engineering. It does this through grants and cooperative agreements to more than 2,000 colleges, universities, K-12 school systems, businesses, informal science organizations and other research organizations throughout the US. The Foundation accounts for about one-fourth of Federal support to academic institutions for basic research.

NSF receives approximately 55,000 proposals each year for research, education and training projects, of which approximately 11,000 are funded. In addition, the Foundation receives several thousand applications for graduate and postdoctoral fellowships. The agency operates no laboratories itself but does support National Research Centers, user facilities, certain oceanographic vessels and Arctic and Antarctic research stations. The Foundation also supports cooperative research between universities and industry, US participation in international scientific and engineering efforts, and educational activities at every academic level.

Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED) provide funding for special assistance or equipment to enable persons with disabilities to work on NSF-supported projects. See the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide Chapter II.F.7 for instructions regarding preparation of these types of proposals.

The National Science Foundation has Telephonic Device for the Deaf (TDD) and Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) capabilities that enable individuals with hearing impairments to communicate with the Foundation about NSF programs, employment or general information. TDD may be accessed at (703) 292-5090 and (800) 281-8749, FIRS at (800) 877-8339.

The National Science Foundation Information Center may be reached at (703) 292-5111.

The National Science Foundation promotes and advances scientific progress in the United States by competitively awarding grants and cooperative agreements for research and education in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering. To get the latest information about program deadlines, to download copies of NSF publications, and to access abstracts of awards, visit the NSF Website at 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314 (NSF Information Center) (703) 292-5111 (703) 292-5090   Send an e-mail to: or telephone: (703) 292-8134 (703) 292-5111 Privacy Act And Public Burden Statements The information requested on proposal forms and project reports is solicited under the authority of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended. The information on proposal forms will be used in connection with the selection of qualified proposals; and project reports submitted by proposers will be used for program evaluation and reporting within the Executive Branch and to Congress. The information requested may be disclosed to qualified reviewers and staff assistants as part of the proposal review process; to proposer institutions/grantees to provide or obtain data regarding the proposal review process, award decisions, or the administration of awards; to government contractors, experts, volunteers and researchers and educators as necessary to complete assigned work; to other government agencies or other entities needing information regarding proposers or nominees as part of a joint application review process, or in order to coordinate programs or policy; and to another Federal agency, court, or party in a court or Federal administrative proceeding if the government is a party. Information about Principal Investigators may be added to the Reviewer file and used to select potential candidates to serve as peer reviewers or advisory committee members. See System of Record Notices , NSF-50 , "Principal Investigator/Proposal File and Associated Records," and NSF-51 , "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records." Submission of the information is voluntary. Failure to provide full and complete information, however, may reduce the possibility of receiving an award. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, an information collection unless it displays a valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. The OMB control number for this collection is 3145-0058. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 120 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions. Send comments regarding the burden estimate and any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Suzanne H. Plimpton Reports Clearance Officer Policy Office, Division of Institution and Award Support Office of Budget, Finance, and Award Management National Science Foundation Alexandria, VA 22314 372 IMAGES Research Proposal Templates- 21+ Free Samples, Examples, Format Download How to Write a Successful Research Proposal How to Write a Research Proposal 😊 Sample of research proposals. 56+ Proposal Examples. 2019-02-16 17 Research Proposal Examples (2024) 9 Free Research Proposal Templates (with Examples) VIDEO Research gov Video Session 41 Navigating NSF: A Roadmap for New Proposals in Research.gov Effective Research Proposals: Characteristics Proposal 101: What Is A Research Topic? How to Send Proposal on UpWork (2024) Workshop 1 The Outline of the research proposal COMMENTS Research.gov about research.gov proposal preparation and submission site the research.gov proposal preparation and submission site modernizes proposal submission capabilities with a focus on enhancing the user experience and reducing administrative burden with a more intuitive interface and more immediate compliance checking feedback as capabilities are migrated from fastlane to research.gov.&nbsp ... PDF How a Principal Investigator Initiates a New Proposal in Research.gov Accessing the Research.gov Proposal Submission System: Open Research.gov. Click Sign In located at the top right of the screen to enter credentials. From the My Desktop page, select the Letters of Intent and Proposals (Preliminary, Full, and Renewal) link under the Prepare & Submit Proposals category. Click the Continue to Proposal System ... PDF Grants.gov Proposal Processing in Research Proposals submitted via Grants.gov that are in progress in Research.gov can be accessed on the Research.gov In Progress page. Select Proposal (Full and Renewals) from the In Progress tile drop-down to locate the proposal. The proposal title will be pre-fixed with "Grants.gov.". PDF Grants.gov Proposal Processing in Research.gov Grants.gov Proposal Processing in Research.gov(Updated on July 11, 2023)National Science Foundation (NSF) proposals submitted via Grants.gov must pass through multiple checks before they are processed in Research.gov. Grants.gov proposals must pass all NSF pre-check. post-check validations in order to be accepted by Research.gov at NSF. When ... Frequently Asked Questions Contact your Institution Administrator and request a password reset, or. Contact the NSF Help Desk at 1-800-381-1532 and request to reset your password. Wait 60 minutes and try again, or. Contact the NSF Help Desk at 1-800-381-1532 and request to reset your password. Following a password reset, you will be prompted to change your password. PDF How to Prepare and Edit Proposals in Research.gov Fastlane. Additionally, any current proposal that requires Disclosure of Lobbying Activities or Proprietary or Privileged Information will need to be submitted through FastLane. 1. Log on to Research.gov 2. Select Prepare & Submit Proposals *Confirm with your solicitation that it can be submitted through research.gov instead of FastLane. All ... PDF How PIs/co-PIs Initiate and Prepare an Updated Current and Pending From the Research.gov homepage, select the Prepare and Submit Proposals link under Proposals. You will be navigated to the proposal preparation landing page. Click the View/Update Submitted drop-down button and select Proposals (Full and Renewals) Locate your proposal and view the Proposal Status column on the right. PDF RESEARCH.GOV SYSTEM INFORMATION research proposals including NSF encourages the research community to use Research.gov for proposal preparation and submission. As NSF continues to enhance the new system, vital feedback from the community is being incorporated during the development process. There are multiple ways to provide feedback and stay informed: Research.gov: Collaborative Proposals Submitted from Multiple As a lead organization you can initiate a request to link proposals with non-lead organizations within Research.gov. There's also a new "Submission Pending Status" which shows an organization that their proposal submission is pending in a queue until all linked lead proposals in the collaboration have the "Submission Pending" status signaling ... PDF National Science Foundation Research.gov Proposal Preparation and ... •Within 24 hours of proposal submission in Research.gov (including proposals submitted via Grants.gov and processed in Research.gov), the proposal will be listed on the Research.gov Proposal Status page •Proposers can access the Proposal Status page using the Proposal Status link under Proposals on the Research.gov homepage NSF Research.gov: Separately Submitted Collaborative Proposals However, all proposals in the collaboration must be prepared and submitted in Research.gov and cannot be a mix of Research.gov and FastLane proposals. New "Submission Pending" Status: The Research.gov submission process for separately submitted collaborative proposals is different than the submission process in FastLane. Research.gov However, all proposals in the collaboration must be prepared and submitted in Research.gov and cannot be a mix of Research.gov and FastLane proposals. New "Submission Pending" Status: The Research.gov submission process for separately submitted collaborative proposals is different than the submission process in FastLane. NSF's Research.gov Expanded: Separately Submitted Collaborative However, all proposals in the collaboration must be prepared and submitted in Research.gov and cannot be a mix of Research.gov and FastLane proposals. New "Submission Pending" Status:The Research.gov submission process for separately submitted collaborative proposals is different than the submission process in FastLane. Update on Proposals in Research.gov All supported proposal types are available in the Research.gov Proposal Preparation Demo Site. New automated compliance checks for FASED, Equipment, and Travel proposal types have been added to Research.gov and are listed on the Research.gov Automated Proposal Compliance Checks for Proposals dated March 22, 2021 on the Automated Compliance ... PDF How to Enter Proposal Budgets How to Enter Proposal Budgets. To enter a budget on a Research.gov proposal initiated by a Principal Investigator (PI), access the Budget(s) landing page either by clicking the Budget(s) link on the proposal main page or by clicking the Budget(s) link on the proposal menu. Refer to the Budget Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Research ... Submitting Your Proposal Grants.gov allows you to create and submit proposals to NSF. The links below will guide you in how to register an organization and submit a proposal using Grants.gov: 1. Registering an organization on Grants.gov. 2. Registering for an NSF ID. 3. Preparing and submitting an NSF proposal in Grants.gov. 4. PDF Research.gov Research.gov. Share Proposal with Other Authorized User (OAU) - In order to have departmental staff assist Principal Investigators (PI) in preparing and completing proposals in Research.gov, the PI should grant the OAU access by following these steps: Step 1) Under Proposal Actions click Manage Personnel and Subaward Organizations. Step 2 ... NSF Collaborative Proposals NSF Collaborative Proposals. Collaborative proposals are those in which investigators from two or more organizations wish to collaborate on a unified research project.They may be submitted to NSF in one of two methods: as a single proposal, in which a single award is being requested (with subawards administered by the lead organization); or by simultaneous submission of proposals from ... NSF Launches Research.gov Demo Site for Proposal Preparation October 28, 2020. The National Science Foundation (NSF) has launched the Research.gov proposal preparation demonstration site. The new demo site offers proposers the opportunity to create proposals in Research.gov with the role of a Principal Investigator (PI) prior to preparing and submitting proposals in the actual Research.gov Proposal ... Proposal submission From the My Desktop page, select the "Letters of Intent and Proposals" link under the Prepare & Submit Proposals category; Click the "Continue to Proposal System" button after reviewing the Welcome to NSF's Research.gov Proposal Submission System pop-up message. On the next screen, select "Full Proposal" from the drop-down menu in ... PDF How to Initiate and Prepare a Proposal File Update 1 Click the View/Update Submitted button and select Proposals (Full and Renewals). 2 Locate your proposal and view the Proposal Status column on the right. The proposal status determines the proposal file update/budget revision actions available for each submitted proposal. If proposal statusis "Submitted to NSF (DueDate Passed or Assigned ... Industry-University Cooperative Research Centers Program (IUCRC) IUCRCs help industry partners and government agencies connect directly and efficiently with university researchers to achieve three primary objectives: 1) Conduct high-impact research to meet shared and critical industrial needs in companies of all sizes; 2) Enhance U.S. global leadership in driving innovative technology development, and 3 ... National Artificial Intelligence Research Institutes Artificial Intelligence (AI) has advanced tremendously and today promises personalized healthcare; enhanced national security; improved transportation; and more effective education, to name just a few benefits. Increased computing power, the availability of large datasets and streaming data, and algorithmic advances in machine learning (ML) have made it possible for AI research and development ... Dear Colleague Letter: NSF and the Romanian Executive Agency for Higher The proposal must be submitted to the appropriate standing program within MPS via Research.gov or Grants.gov. If proposers are using Research.gov and the research collaboration only includes one US institution, proposers may select the option "Single Proposal (with or without sub-awards)" in Step 4. Proposal Details of the "Prepare New Full ... How to Prepare and Edit Proposals in Research.gov NSF currently has NSF currently has only certain proposal- types available to submit through Research.gov. When you first access the Prepare Proposals sections below, you will see a Welcome popup that will note which proposals can be submitted via this system. (list as of 2020.12.16) If you don't see your proposal- type in the list, you'll need to submit ... Dear Colleague Letter: Funding Opportunities for Science and March 18, 2024. Dear Colleagues: With this Dear Colleague Letter (DCL), in response to the White House Initiative on Women's Health Research, the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) encourages the submission of research and education proposals related to women's health.Despite making up more than half of the population, women are historically understudied and underrepresented in health ... How to Login to Research.gov Click on the Log In for NSF Visitors link from this page. On this page, click on the link "You can also login using your existing Yahoo! account.". On the next page select either the Yahoo icon to login to Research.gov as a Visitor. On the next page, click the allow button and login using your Yahoo credentials to finalize the login process. Major Research Instrumentation Program (MRI) The Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) Program (MRI Program Website) serves to increase access to multi-user scientific and engineering instrumentation for research and research training in our Nation's institutions of higher education and not-for-profit scientific/engineering research organizations.An MRI award supports the acquisition of a multi-user research instrument that is ... Research.gov Registration This one-time activation process will give you access to application status information for applications (proposals) submitted to the participating Research.gov partners. Note: ... To activate additional accounts navigate to the My Profile link section of Research.gov (Figure 6). This link is available on the right-hand side of the Research.gov ... NSF 24-598: Mid-scale Research Infrastructure-1 (Mid-scale RI-1) Please note that some errors cannot be corrected in Grants.gov. Once a proposal passes pre-checks but fails any post-check, an applicant can only correct and submit the in-progress proposal in Research.gov. Proposers that submitted via Research.gov may use Research.gov to verify the status of their submission to NSF. essay homework paper phd project resume review speech thesis