Demystifying Retrospective PhDs by Publication: A Collective Approach- First Online: 28 September 2022
Cite this chapter402 Accesses The Retrospective PhD by Publication provides an attractive alternative doctoral route for colleagues wishing to gain a PhD through a largely self-directed route, usually by building up a body of publications over a period of time then uniting them through a connecting narrative showing the golden thread that provides the coherence, originality and contribution of the oeuvre in a way that is equivalent to or better than traditional doctoral study approaches. This chapter describes my original, un-funded and creative approach to supporting around a dozen candidates for Retrospective PhD by publication over a nine-year period, informally and collectively alongside my husband (and co-author) Prof Phil Race domestically. This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access. Access this chapterSubscribe and save. - Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
- Available as PDF
- Read on any device
- Instant download
- Own it forever
- Available as EPUB and PDF
- Compact, lightweight edition
- Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
- Free shipping worldwide - see info
- Durable hardcover edition
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout Purchases are for personal use only Institutional subscriptions Similar content being viewed by othersScholarly Publication, Early-Career Scholars, and ReflectivityAn account of bifurcated senses and spaces in the pursuit of early-career academic publications. Cracking Through the Wall to Let the Light In: Disrupting Doctoral Discourses Through Collaborative AutoethnographyCirillo, F. (2006). The pomodoro technique (the pomodoro). Agile Processes in Software Engineering, 54 (2), 35. Google Scholar Eardley, A. F., Banister, E., & Fletcher, M. (2020). Can academic writing retreats function as wellbeing interventions? Journal of Further and Higher Education , 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1744542 Grant, B. M. (2006). Writing in the company of other women: Exceeding the boundaries. Studies in Higher Education, 31 (4), 483–495. Article Google Scholar Holgate, P., & Sambell, K. (2020). The professional doctorate by portfolio: Alternative assessment for advanced practitioner-led scholarship? Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 13 (1), 57–69. Murray, R., & Kempenaar, L. (2018). Why do women attend writing retreats? Gender and Education, 32 (3), 1–18. Scherman, R. (2019). Student writing weekends: A model for encouraging undergraduate student publication. Frontiers in Psychology, 10 , 1183. Smith, S. (2015). PhD by published work: A practical guide for success . Macmillan International Higher Education. Download references Author informationAuthors and affiliations. Emerita Professor, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK Sally Brown You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar Corresponding authorCorrespondence to Sally Brown . Editor informationEditors and affiliations. Moray House School of Education and Sport, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK Sin Wang Chong Wearside View, St Peter's Campus, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK Neil Johnson Questions used for the informal survey of participants: What effect did coming for a 24 hour residential reasonably regularly have on your progress towards completion of your PhD? What impact did it have on you that you were thereby meeting other people all working towards the same goal? What impact did the weekends have on your motivation, confidence and belief that you could finish the task? If you have not completed your PhD as a result of the weekends, what reasons would you give (e.g. deciding this was not a course of action you wanted to take right now)? What has been the impact on you personally of achieving the PhD if indeed you have? Any other comments on process? Rights and permissionsReprints and permissions Copyright information© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG About this chapterBrown, S. (2022). Demystifying Retrospective PhDs by Publication: A Collective Approach. In: Chong, S.W., Johnson, N. (eds) Landscapes and Narratives of PhD by Publication. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04895-1_9 Download citationDOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04895-1_9 Published : 28 September 2022 Publisher Name : Springer, Cham Print ISBN : 978-3-031-04894-4 Online ISBN : 978-3-031-04895-1 eBook Packages : Education Education (R0) Share this chapterAnyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative Policies and ethics - Find a journal
- Track your research
Completing a PhD by Published WorksBethan jones, university of york. 4 March 2022 In June 2021 I sat my viva. Not unusual for a PhD student, I hear you say. You’re right. But my PhD was done via published works and in the research I did to prepare for the viva I didn’t find much about this route. A PhD by published works ( https://www.postgrad.com/advice/phd/phd_by_publication/ ) isn’t a particularly common route in the UK, though the availability does seem to be growing. As the name suggests, it’s an option which allows you to submit a thesis comprising of a series of publications on a common theme (books, book chapters or journal articles) which when put together fulfil the requirements of a PhD – original work making a significant contribution to the field and demonstrating a rigorous approach. I started my PhD journey via the standard thesis routes but for a variety of reasons ended up withdrawing and subsequently applying for a PhD by Published Works at Cardiff University ( https://www.cardiff.ac.uk/study/postgraduate/research/types-of-degree/phd ). Because this isn’t generally offered to students beginning a PhD there were some specific requirements. These will vary from institution to institution but at Cardiff you have to have: - graduated from Cardiff University six or more years ago, or
- been a member of staff for six years, or
- been the holder of an honorary title from Cardiff University for six years
I received my MA from Cardiff in 2010 and was applying for the PhD by Published Works in 2019 so that checked the first box. I’d also published extensively on anti-fandom and had enough to demonstrate a coherent research direction. My submission was reviewed by an internal panel who approved my application for a February 2020 start. All I needed to do was produce a 5,000 – 10,000 word critical commentary evaluating the field (fan studies in my case) and indicating the original contribution to learning I’d made and submit within 12 months. Then Covid happened. Did I mention I was working full time in government communications? Cardiff granted extensions to all PhD students which meant that despite the pandemic I was able to submit in April 2021 and passed the viva in June. I was the first person who’d done a PhD by Published Work in Cardiff for some time, and while I was writing the critical commentary and preparing for the viva I found very few resources for completing this route (Agata Frymus’ IAMHIST blog – http://iamhist.net/2018/06/prepare-viva-8-tips/ – on viva preparation was really useful though!). So here’s what I did and how I did in, in the hopes it might help others undertaking this route. Writing the Critical Commentary The critical commentary that I had to produce needed to evaluate the field and indicate the original contribution to learning I’d made. What I did first was arrange a meeting with my supervisors to talk about what I felt the key themes were and how I was thinking of approaching the commentary, and then discussing what they thought the key themes were and how they suggested approaching it. The key things to keep in the back of my mind throughout the writing were originality, significance and rigour. I also had to not be too modest (this is underlined and followed by an exclamation mark in my notes). We talked about pulling out themes and talking across them, as well as making nods to omission and things I didn’t have the time to do. I had thought about writing the commentary chronologically, but given the often arduous process of academic publishing (one of the chapters I wrote in 2013 was published in 2019) that didn’t really make sense. So I read through each of my articles, noted where there was overlap between the things I was discussing and ended up with four categories (textual anti-fandom and beyond; power structures and hierarchies; intra- and extra- fandom relationships; and ambivalence and unticipation for those who are interested). Each category discussed two of the chapters, and I also included a methodology section which discussed a journal paper I wrote about the ethics of researching anti-fans. My commentary ended up looking like this: introduction; methodology; discussion of submitted papers; absences and future work; conclusion; bibliography. Introduction I wrote a paragraph introducing myself and my entry into fan studies as well as the things that led me to researching anti-fandom. From there I went straight into a mini lit review of the scholarship on anti-fandom, the different waves of fan studies as defined by Gray, Sandvoss and Lee Harrington (2007) and where my work intersects and builds upon this. I outlined three key areas which my work has focused on and pointed out where I had expanded previous work, including references to articles and chapters that I’d written as well as work by other scholars. I briefly outlined the later sections of the commentary, again pointing out where my key contributions were. Methodology Fan studies borrows a lot of theoretical and methodological approaches from other disciplines and the ethics of research fans has long been a debate in the field. I felt it was important to engage with this not only to show the approaches I’d used across my work and my understanding of different methodologies, but to highlight the contribution I’d made in writing the first article of the ethics of researching anti-fans. A recent special issue of Transformative Works and Cultures ( https://journal.transformativeworks.org/index.php/twc/issue/view/59 ) discussed methodologies so I was able to cite that, as well as older work to demonstrate my depth of knowledge. I also brought these back to other papers I’d written, pointing out the methods I’d used in papers that I would be discussing in later sections. This section also allowed me to demonstrate rigour in terms of number of survey participants, how I approached public tweets, etc. Paper discussions Although the paper discussions were divided into four sections each followed a similar pattern. I first gave a brief overview of a key text that had influenced my thinking (e.g. Gray’s 2003 article on anti-fandom), explained why that was important or how I was using it, and then talked about how I expanded on that text in the articles discussed. I highlighted where my original contribution was (there was a LOT of this throughout the commentary) and included pertinent quotes from my papers. I ended each subsection with a short summary of where the papers expanded current thinking and signposted to the next one. I referred to existing literature throughout this section to demonstrate my understanding of work in the field and to situate my scholarship amongst it. It felt like a lot of blowing my own trumpet, and the consistent feedback from my supervisors was to talk more about my original contribution, to show what I’d done was significant. That was probably one of the hardest things to do but it made me think critically about the work and ultimately helped with the viva. Absences and future work I was keen to point of where there were weaknesses in my research and what I was thinking about doing next. 10,000 words isn’t a huge amount to play with, but with current discussions in the field about race and racism I felt it was important for me to address that lack in my work. I also wanted to point out where fan studies as a field was growing and how I was engaging with that, so I talked about a paper I had recently presented and a book chapter I’m writing that engage with the current climate. You’ve always got to show the significance of your work! The conclusion was essentially a recap of what I’d been saying throughout the commentary: my work has developed as the field has developed and I’ve been able to influence that through the publications I discussed. I also touched on work I’d done elsewhere that I hadn’t included in the commentary, and lectures I’ve been asked to give. This was really the final place where I could underscore how my work has been significant and where my contribution to the field is original. Preparing for, and Undertaking, the Viva I submitted the PhD in April and had a few weeks off before thinking about the viva. That time was important not only to switch my brain off but because I’d become sick of reading and rereading my work! When I got the date for the viva I turned to Google to see how others had done their viva preparation. There wasn’t much on the PhD by published works route, so I turned to Reddit and was told it would be very similar to a regular viva except I’ve already got the benefit of having the work peer reviewed and published. The focus would be on showing I did the work and understand it. That was pretty reassuring so I returned to Google, read various blogs and articles about viva questions and jotted down some of the ones I thought I’d struggle with. This blog was particularly helpful with those: http://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/ResearchEssentials/?p=156 . After that I began reading through the publications I was including and making notes as to their key arguments and findings; the methodology and scholarship used; and their strengths and weaknesses (thanks to Agata’s blog piece). I’d fairly recently read the work for the commentary so each article was pretty clear in my mind. This time though I read the articles on my laptop and made notes and highlighted sections I thought would be useful for answering questions. At the same time had a notebook next to me where I noted really top-line details using the headings Agata outlined in her blog. Once I’d done that I wrote down the theories used across all articles, the originality of the work as a whole, and its strengths and weaknesses. That done, I arranged a mock viva with one of my supervisors. As much as I hate doing things like mock interviews it was really useful. My supervisor treated it as a real viva and covered questions from the methods I chose to use to what was significant about particular articles to what had gone wrong and what would I do differently. Some of the questions I could answer easily, others I had to really think about, but it gave me the chance to think through my work and articulate the things that were really important. The weekend before the viva I read over my notes, then went to visit friends for a birthday party. I had thought about staying home and revising some more, but a lot of the blogs I’d read suggested that would only stress me out and wouldn’t do much good (remember, at this stage you know your work inside out). So I went and had a lovely time, and I’m really glad I did. The day before the viva I put my back out so spent most of that day on painkillers and not doing much reading either. 0/10, would not recommend. The day of the viva I read through my notes a bit and, I think, played games on my phone. The viva was via Zoom so I made myself a cup of tea and put two bottles of water and some sweets by my computer. I had my submission up on one computer with the other ready to log into the meeting, and I had the notebook I’d been using to prepare with me as well. I took some painkillers because I still couldn’t move without being in pain and also hoped that my cat wouldn’t come in and start meowing at me (I love him, but the number of meetings he interrupts…) Yes, that is the mug I used… I logged in at half three, met my examiners and the chair, then logged out until their pre-brief was done and they were ready for me. I’m not going to lie, I was as nervous as I’ve ever been! At this point everyone had been telling me I had nothing to worry about, but with a PhD by Published Works you don’t have the option of different types of corrections – the work is already published so you’re looking at a pass or fail. The first question I got asked – what’s significant about your research – totally threw me even though I’d been preparing for it and it’s one of the most common opening questions. I bumbled through somehow and as the viva went on it did become easier. I got asked about the duty of care we have to research participants (even if we completely disagree with their actions or the views they’re expressing) as well as ourselves as researchers, and the difficulty of undertaking surveys rather than face to face interviews. I got asked to expand upon something I’d mentioned in the commentary but hadn’t talked in detail about; I got a really interesting question after talking about Fifty Shades of Grey about whether you can be an anti-fan of domestic violence and if not, why not. By the time we’d been going for an hour I was really enjoying it. The chair asked if we wanted a break, my examiners said they were done and I got asked to leave while they deliberated. Deliberations took about five minutes but it felt much longer. I got told I’d passed, had a bit of a joke about how normally they’d ask what my publishing plans were but that kind of didn’t apply in this case, and one of my examiners suggested expanding upon one of the things I’d talked about and submitting it to a journal. Then it was over. I rang my family, texted my friends and celebrated with cake. Dr Bethan Jones is a Research Associate in the Department of Theatre, Film, Television and Interactive Media at the University of York. Her work primarily focuses on gender, anti-fandom, and popular culture and she has been published in Sexualities , Intensities , and Transformative Works and Cultures , among others. She is coeditor of Crowdfunding the Future: Media Industries, Ethics and Digital Society published by Peter Lang and is a founding board member of the Fan Studies Network. Disclaimer: The IAMHIST Blog is a platform that offers individual scholars the opportunity to present their work and thoughts. They alone are responsible for the content, which does not represent the view of the IAMHIST council or other IAMHIST members. Leave a ReplyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email. IAMHIST NEWS- IAMHIST-HJFRT books for review
- IAMHIST Blog Call for Papers
IAMHIST BLOG - latest publications- “Researching Cinema in the First World War” Workshop Report – Alan Corley
- New Year Films in Spring Festival: Documenting and Reviewing Life – Qi AI
- Review, Tomb Raider I: Tomb Raider I – III Remastered – Llewella Chapman
HJFRT - iamhist members onlyIAMHIST BLOGRecent posts. - Call for Guest-Edited Thematic Issues: Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television July 19, 2024
- Books for Review Summer 2024 July 3, 2024
- A Day at the Archives… East Anglian Film Archive June 16, 2024
- Making History: the story of the British Video History Trust Collection May 19, 2024
- Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television: Call for Editorial Assistant May 19, 2024
- Tomb Raider I-III Remastered (2024): Community perceptions May 2, 2024
- IAMHIST Masterclass and One-Day Symposium, ‘Hidden Archives: Marginalised and Alternative Collections and Practices’, Irish Film Institute (IFI), 29-30 January 2024 April 25, 2024
- Future [of] Archives, IAMHIST Conference, Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada (20-22 June 2023) April 25, 2024
- Report: ‘Hidden Archives: Marginalised and Alternative Collections and Practices’, IAMHIST Symposium, Irish Film Institute (Dublin), Tuesday 30th January 2024 April 12, 2024
- ‘A Curious Death’: Going on an archival quest March 30, 2024
Analytics Plugin created by Jake Ruston's Wordpress Plugins - Powered by Japanese Foot Pads and social bookmarking sites . Study PostgraduatePhd by published work (warwick medical school) (2022 entry), find out more about our phd by published work course.. Our PhD by Published Work is open to individuals who have already undertaken a portfolio of published research to the standard of a PhD. Warwick Medical School is home to outstanding expertise, with guidance from an academic adviser you will complete and present your published work. Course code Flexible (depending on the duration of the admissions process) 1 year full-time Qualification Warwick Medical SchoolUniversity of Warwick About this research graduate courseCourse overview. Our PhD by Published Work is open to individuals who have already undertaken a portfolio of published research to the standard of a PhD. An academic advisor will provide guidance on the presentation of your published work. Your submission should include further contextual information regarding the publications, including, but not limited to, the profile of journals that articles have been published in, the number of citations, and their significance to the field. General entry requirementsMinimum requirements. 2:i undergraduate degree or Master’s degree. Please also see our consideration and application process information on the Warwick Medical School website . English language requirementsYou can find out more about our English language requirements . This course requires the following: - IELTS overall score of 6.5, minimum component scores not below 6.0.
International qualificationsWe welcome applications from students with other internationally recognised qualifications. For more information, please visit the international entry requirements page . Additional requirementsThere are no additional entry requirements for this course. Our researchAny relevant health-related published research. Full details of our research interests are listed on the Warwick Medical School website. Read more about our research strategy, research centres and research programmes. You can also read our general University research proposal guidance. Find a supervisorFind your supervisor using the link below and discuss with them the area you'd like to research. Explore our Warwick Medical School List of Approved Supervisors to where you will be able to search by research interests. You should initially approach a suitable Academic Advisor (supervisor) from this list to discuss their work and to see if they would be willing to provide guidance on the presentation of the proposed Thesis for submission. You can also see our general University guidance about finding a supervisor. Tuition feesTuition fees are payable for each year of your course at the start of the academic year, or at the start of your course, if later. Academic fees cover the cost of tuition, examinations and registration and some student amenities. Taught course fees Research course fees Fee Status GuidanceWe carry out an initial fee status assessment based on the information you provide in your application. Students will be classified as Home or Overseas fee status. Your fee status determines tuition fees, and what financial support and scholarships may be available. If you receive an offer, your fee status will be clearly stated alongside the tuition fee information. Do you need your fee classification to be reviewed? If you believe that your fee status has been classified incorrectly, you can complete a fee status assessment questionnaire. Please follow the instructions in your offer information and provide the documents needed to reassess your status. Find out more about how universities assess fee status Additional course costsAs well as tuition fees and living expenses, some courses may require you to cover the cost of field trips or costs associated with travel abroad. Information about department specific costs should be considered in conjunction with the more general costs below, such as: As well as tuition fees and living expenses, some courses may require you to cover the cost of field trips or costs associated with travel abroad. For departmental specific costs, please see the Modules tab on the course web page for the list of core and optional core modules with hyperlinks to our Module Catalogue (please visit the Department’s website if the Module Catalogue hyperlinks are not provided). Associated costs can be found on the Study tab for each module listed in the Module Catalogue (please note most of the module content applies to 2022/23 year of study). Information about module department specific costs should be considered in conjunction with the more general costs below: - Core text books
- Printer credits
- Dissertation binding
- Robe hire for your degree ceremony
Scholarships and bursariesScholarships and financial supportFind out about the different funding routes available, including; postgraduate loans, scholarships, fee awards and academic department bursaries. Living costsFind out more about the cost of living as a postgraduate student at the University of Warwick. Established in 2000, Warwick Medical School (WMS) forms part of the Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine at the University of Warwick. Alongside a range of educational opportunities, WMS has a reputation for research excellence, investigating solutions to significant global health challenges. Find out more about us on our website Our Graduate Entry Undergraduate courseOur Postgraduate Taught courses- Advanced Clinical Practice (Critical Care) (PG Cert/PG Dip/MSc)
- Advanced Clinical Practice (PG Cert/PG Dip/MSc)
- Diabetes (PGCert/PGDip)
- Health Research (PG Cert/PG Dip/MSc)
- Interdisciplinary Biomedical Research (MSc)
- Medical Education (PG Cert/PG Dip/MMedEd)
- Public Health (PG Cert/PG Dip/MPH)
Our Postgraduate Research courses- MD Doctor of Medicine
- MSc by Research (at Warwick Medical School)
- PhD (at Warwick Medical School)
- PhD by Published Work
Taught course applicationsHere is our checklist on how to apply for taught postgraduate courses at Warwick. Research course applicationsHere is our checklist on how to apply for research postgraduate degrees at the University of Warwick. After you’ve appliedFind out how we process your application. Applicant PortalTrack your application and update your details. Admissions statementSee Warwick’s postgraduate admissions policy. Join a live chatAsk questions and engage with Warwick. Postgraduate Open DayPostgraduate fairs. Throughout the year we attend exhibitions and fairs online and in the UK. These events give you the chance to learn about our Master's and PhD study routes, and the wider context of postgraduate study. Find out more Every week, you can connect directly with representatives from Warwick, who will be answering your questions on applying to and studying postgraduate studies at Warwick. Sign up for Live Chats Departmental eventsSome academic departments hold events for specific postgraduate programmes, these are fantastic opportunities to learn more about Warwick and your chosen department and course. See our online departmental events Connect with usWant to hear more about postgraduate study at Warwick? Register your interest and find out more. Learn more about Postgraduate study at the University of Warwick. Why WarwickDiscover why Warwick is one of the best universities in the UK and renowned globally. 6th in the UK (The Guardian University Guide 2022) Link opens in a new window 64th in the world (QS World University Rankings 2023) Link opens in a new window 6th most targeted university by the UK's top 100 graduate employers Link opens in a new window (The Graduate Market in 2022, High Fliers Research Ltd. Link opens in a new window ) About the information on this pageThis information is applicable for 2022 entry. Given the interval between the publication of courses and enrolment, some of the information may change. It is important to check our website before you apply. Please read our terms and conditions to find out more. To read this content please select one of the options below:Please note you do not have access to teaching notes, publish and be doctor‐rated: the phd by published work. Quality Assurance in Education ISSN : 0968-4883 Article publication date: 25 September 2009 The purpose of this paper is, first, to provide a brief account of the PhD by published work focusing especially on quality assurance issues such as eligibility of candidates, the nature of the submission itself, supervision and assessment procedures. Second, it seeks to offer a discussion of the criteria to be met by candidates in writing a critical appraisal as a central feature of the submission. Design/methodology/approachThe approach taken is that of an analytical, conceptual and discursive essay. There is still a lack of commonality in higher education about the nature of the PhD by published work. One way of gaining greater commonality would be to strengthen the use of the critical appraisal as an academic text which also should be required to meet the admittedly problematical standards of publishability. Research limitations/implicationsThe paper's main limitation is that many of its ideas and much of its information are derived from sources within the UK's higher education sector. Nevertheless the issues raised should have relevance to practice in other systems. Practical implicationsA case is made for the usefulness of the PhD by published work as an important route for achieving doctorateness especially when the critical appraisal is given greater priority and supervisory support. Originality/valuePapers discussing the use and value of the PhD by published work are still relatively rare in academic journals. The emphasis on the critical appraisal in this paper is an original contribution to the debate. Badley, G. (2009), "Publish and be doctor‐rated: the PhD by published work", Quality Assurance in Education , Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 331-342. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880910992313 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2009, Emerald Group Publishing Limited Related articlesAll feedback is valuable. Please share your general feedback Report an issue or find answers to frequently asked questionsContact Customer Support Advice for supervising a PhD by published worksThe route to a PhD by published works requires a different approach to supervision. Here, Alison Brettle provides aspects to consider based on her experience conducting, supervising and developing institutional guidance Alison BrettleYou may also likePopular resources .css-1txxx8u{overflow:hidden;max-height:81px;text-indent:0px;} A DIY guide to starting your own journalWhere to start with generative ai chatbot customisation, what leaders get wrong in pursuit of an equitable campus, emotions and learning: what role do emotions play in how and why students learn, contextual learning: linking learning to the real world. PhD by published works is a route to PhD where registration and doctoral supervision usually begin once a portfolio of peer-reviewed works is complete. Its advantages and challenges demand a specific approach to supervision. What is a PhD by published works?A PhD by published works takes different forms in different countries, but in the UK it usually involves: - completion of a portfolio of publications around a coherent theme prior to registration on a programme
- the development of a narrative or contextual chapter(s) providing a critical overview of the works and their contribution to the discipline
- a short period of candidature (one to two years).
The publications and narrative together should be comparable to a traditional PhD. The work is examined in the same way (via written submission and oral defence) and to the same standard (that is, it must demonstrate a unique contribution to knowledge, be independent work that is of peer-review quality, and show an understanding of appropriate research methodology). - Why get a PhD by publication (and other career tips)
- How can PhD researchers be supported to complete an alternative format thesis?
- Five characteristics of effective supervisor training
Individual institutions may have slightly different restrictions for admission; some offer this route only to staff, honorary staff or alumni, while others allow candidates with undergraduate or master’s degrees from different institutions. Misconceptions, challenges and advantages of a PhD by published workCommon misconceptions I have faced when championing PhD by published works include that “it is an easier way of getting a PhD”, “it’s a lower quality” and that “it’s a faster way of getting a PhD”. This is not the case. The award criteria are the same as for a traditional PhD. Most of the work undertaken in compiling a PhD portfolio is done before registration as a PhD candidate. This means that candidates often do the work without supervision, guidance or access to research training while holding down a professional role. Undertaking research and publishing it in academic journals is a rigorous and often painful process, particularly for a novice. Furthermore, academic publishing is slow. So, while the formal registration as a PhD candidate is short, the journey to get there is likely to be longer and more difficult. Advantages for candidates in choosing this route to PhD include: - flexibility (publications can be developed over time, accommodating career and family changes)
- opportunities to work on a wider range of projects with a wider variety of people
- obtaining academic recognition for work undertaken during a professional role.
Tips for supervising a PhD by published worksSupervising a PhD by published works is no less rewarding than supervising a traditional PhD and involves many of the same skills. Each candidate is individual, and their work and portfolio will reflect their own context and journey and be appropriate to the discipline. As with any PhD, no completed submission will be the same. If your experience is with supervising traditional PhDs, supervising a PhD by published works for the first time may require you to think a little differently at the outset and change your standard approach. What do you need to consider?- Be open-minded. What are the key elements of a PhD (theory, critical discussion, understanding of research methods)? These may not have been addressed in the same way or at a particular stage in the journey as during a traditional PhD. For example, the critique of the literature may be addressed in the narrative chapter (so at the end of the process) rather than at the outset of the PhD journey.
- Candidates may struggle initially to see their work as a whole or coherent story. Getting them to think of an overarching research question that their work addresses or a set of aims and objectives may help overcome this. This can then be used as a framework for presenting the work.
- You may need to guide your candidate to develop and see their contribution to knowledge. This could be through the development of their critical narrative, which sets their work within the wider field. The contribution to knowledge is across the body of works or may develop further as the narrative unfolds. Individual papers or pieces of work may include separate contributions to knowledge.
- Candidates may have built up research skills and knowledge in practice but may have had little formal methods training. You may need guide them to get up to speed quickly and help them relate the training to what they have done in practice.
- Candidates may have undertaken much of their research without planning to do a PhD, so may need guidance to change their mindset, see themselves as an academic and defend their work with confidence.
- Candidates may have an extensive list of publications; you will need to guide them to choose the most appropriate examples to demonstrate the coherent story that addresses the PhD criteria.
- For co-authored publications, co-authors need to verify the candidate’s contribution.
- Across the publications, the candidate should demonstrate the skills and elements equivalent to a traditional PhD, but all the elements do not need to be present in each publication. Over time, you would expect to see development as an independent researcher. For example, in early publications the candidate may have conducted a literature review or the data collection; later they may have progressed to designing and leading the study.
I have spent many years championing the PhD by published works route as a robust alternative approach. Guiding PhD by published works candidates to see their work in a different light and clearly understand their academic potential has been one of the most rewarding experiences of my career to date. Alison Brettle is professor of health information and evidence-based practice and director of the Centre for Applied Health Research at the University of Salford. Alison has been shortlisted in the Outstanding Research Supervisor of the Year category in the Times Higher Education Awards 2023 #THEAwards. A full list of nominees can be found here . The awards will be presented at a ceremony in Liverpool on 7 December. If you would like advice and insight from academics and university staff delivered direct to your inbox each week, sign up for the Campus newsletter . Using data skills to turn students’ passion for sports into rewarding careersA diy guide to starting your own journal, finding a community and career through data skills, key questions to help universities measure societal impact, campus webinar: the evolution of interdisciplinarity, why we should be giving feedback via video. Register for free and unlock a host of features on the THE site PhD by PublicationThe PhD by Publication is an accelerated, part-time PhD award intended for those who have carried out extensive research over a significant period of time and have a number of publications arising from this work which have already been published in high-quality journals. This should not be confused with the standard PhD (3-4 years full-time). If you have any questions about the PhD by Publication degree which are not answered on this page, please email us or call us . Clearing now open. Find out more Go to Clearing page . PhD by published workThe PhD by published work route is intended primarily for mid-career research-active academics who, for one reason or another, haven’t had the opportunity to undertake a research programme leading to a PhD. Submissions for this award will consist of a coherent body of work which is of the same quality, rigour and volume as required of a standard PhD in your field and which constitutes an original contribution to knowledge. We welcome applications from Westminster staff and from outside the University. Applications are considered on their merits within the relevant colleges and applicants are advised to approach the relevant members of academic staff for an informal discussion before applying. If your application is successful, you will be assigned one or more supervisors who will advise on which of your publications should form your final submission to be examined and how your commentary should be written. The commentary (15,000 words) describes the aims of the research you’ve undertaken to produce your publications, incorporates an analytical discussion of the main results and puts the total work submitted in context. What kind of publications are considered to be appropriate for a submission via this route?- books and book chapters
- refereed journal papers
- Other media/other public output (eg architectural or engineering designs)
- The submission of a single book, work or artefact is also possible
- The body of work may not include any material produced more than ten years before the date of submission
How do I apply?You should first make contact with the relevant academic or relevant College for an informal discussion of your publications and how they might be considered for a PhD by Published Work. If you decide to apply, you will make an application in the normal way. What should my application consist of?In addition to the standard application process, your application should also include a portfolio of publications, accompanied by a proposal not exceeding 2,000 words in length, which contextualises the selected publications, demonstrates their coherence and outlines the intended contribution to knowledge. View the guidance on how to write your PhD by published work research proposal . What happens after I’ve applied?Your application will be considered by a College panel, which will assess the quality and the coherence of your publications and your proposal, and if the panel wishes to take your application further, it will invite you to interview, following which you will receive a decision. How long will it take from initial enrolment to final submission of the work for examination?This is a part-time programme which takes a minimum of 12 months and a maximum of 24 months. What should I do next?- Check that you meet the entry requirements and review your options for funding your programme
- Find out if we cover your proposed area of research and if there is a supervisory team available
If you decide to proceed, you can find links to apply and all the information you need on our Research area pages . Related pagesFees and funding. How much will it cost to study a research degree? Entry requirementsFind out if you can apply for a Research Degree at the University of Westminster. Research degree by distance learningFind out about Research Degree distance learning options at the University of Westminster. We use cookies to ensure the best experience on our website.By accepting you agree to cookies being stored on your device. Some of these cookies are essential to the running of the site, while others help us to improve your experience. Functional cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. Analytics cookies help us improve our website based on user needs by collecting information, which does not directly identify anyone. Marketing cookies send information on your visit to third parties so that they can make their advertising more relevant to you when you visit other websites. PhD by Prior Publication Double PhD by Prior PublicationPhd by prior publication or existing published. PhD by Publication's CandidatesThe ConversationDebora Wenger receives first PhD by Prior Publication from Kingston UniversityUniversity of Chester’s first PhD by publication CandidateResearch GateAlexander macmillan (engineer) (university of cambridge, uk), mary ellen o'connell (university of cambridge, uk), christopher catherwood (university of east anglia, uk), josephine balmer (university of east anglia, uk), graham joyce (nottingham trent university, uk), wendy mcmurdo (university of westminster, uk), phd by journal publication (isi-q1, q2, q3, q4)*, thesis format. List of Universities that offers the PhD by Prior Publication or Existing PublishedAdvan-kt Multiversity, USA Northumbria University UK Westminster University UK Kingston University UK Machanster Metropolitan University UK Massey University New Zealand Griffith University Australia University of Bristol UK University of Stirling UK Aberystwyth University UK University of New England UK Charles Sturt University Australia University of Portsmouth UK Glasgow Caledonian University UK University of Bradford UK Deakin University Australia Unimap Malaysia University of Gibraltar Spain London School of Economics UK Liverpool John Moores University UK University of New York Prague University of East Anglia UK Maynooth University, Ireland University of Manchester UK City University of London UK Victoria University Australia RMIT University Australia Monash University Australia University of Tasmania Australia Dublin City University Ireland Wolverhampton University UK University of New South Wales Australia University of Reading UK University of Exeter UK University College London UK University College Cork, Ireland Royal Holloway University UK Middlesex University London Waikato University New Zealand Queensland University of Technology Australia Oxford Brookes University UK James Cook University Australia University of Sydney Australia University of South Australia Western Sydney University Australia University of New Castle Australia Flinders University Australia Bongor University UK Does a continent matter in a PhD by Prior Publication ?Which PhD type is regarded as most difficult ?Does ISI Web of Science play crucial role in a PhD by Prior Publication as compared to universities ?Anyone aware about Ph.D. by publication?International Conference on PhD by Prior PublicationDate: 7th Aug 2023, Vanue: Online Conference, Time: 10 AM (GMT+8.00) www.advan-kt.com | tuition free education for all Doctor of Business AdministrationBy publication. The Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) by publication pathway offers an alternative approach for experienced professionals who have already made significant contributions to the field of business administration through published research. It recognizes the value of practical experience and encourages candidates to leverage their expertise to contribute to the scholarly community. It acknowledges the value of candidates' professional experience and their contributions to the field of business administration. Candidates are typically required to have extensive managerial or executive experience, demonstrating their ability to apply theoretical knowledge to practical business challenges. Unlike traditional DBA programs that require a traditional dissertation, the DBA by publication allows candidates to demonstrate their expertise and scholarly contributions through a series of published papers or articles. Assessment method: Coursework and Capstone Duration : 2-4 years Study mode : Online Course information- An MBL, MBA, or equivalent Master's degree from an accredited tertiary institution (provide a clear copy of the degree as well as a transcript indicating the symbol or percentage obtained for each module and indicating that the qualification was completed)
- An average pass mark of 65% and above for the Master's degree
- Applicants are often required to submit a research statement or proposal that outlines their research focus, potential research questions, and the significance of their publications. The research statement should demonstrate how the applicant's published work aligns with a central research theme or focus area.
- Submit a recent Curriculum Vitae
- Submit a clear copy of your ID or passport.
Candidates will have a minimum of two (2) years and a maximum of four (4) years in which to complete the DBA degree successfully. Blockchain verified degreeGraduates receive a simple, secure, lifelong link that can be shared directly with recruiters or published on their LinkedIn profiles. By clicking on this link, certified data can be read in real time on the Ethereum blockchain-based Polygon chain. You can download your award in PDF format from the link sent to you. The award will have a QR code that can be scanned without a QR code scanner application. With this privilege, you can also share your digital award on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. Read more about our blockchain verified degree at here Common questionsHow long does it take to get a business degree. When pursuing doctoral degrees, students usually focus on business theories, management strategies, and or other specializations. It requires a significant time commitment to complete a business degree, which generally can take up to 3-6 years after completion of a master's. Appropriately, prospective students must consider if they need a doctoral degree to pursue their career goals. How can I tailor a business degree for my needs?You can start by exploring the various degrees and narrowing them to your interests. Then, choose a program that is applicable to them to achieve your goals. Consider choosing a major so you can obtain skills and further your knowledge that aligns with your career goals. Which business online degree program could be right for me?After identifying your interests, it is important to understand which path is right for you. Therefore, when deciding to choose a degree, you must think of why you want to earn this degree and what are the outcomes that you expect at the end of it. You must also consider whether the program you are choosing will open doors to your career. What is Prior Learning Assessment (PLA)?A prior learning assessment (PLA) is also known as a course exemption or advanced standing. It is a form of evaluation of the learning that is gained outside of traditional institutes toward further education or training. PLA is a proven intervention that helps learners reduce their educational costs and time to graduation. How does a business degree prepare me for, or enhance, my business career?Earning a business degree can equip you with many important managerial and leadership skills for a successful career, such as how to overcome business struggles and manage employees, effective communication, and maintaining a strong mentality within your team while accessing the business world. You can also gain some other benefits including: - become a better and more knowledgeable leader
- increase of pay
- a better comprehension of business strategy and management
- higher job performance and development of skills
Phd-Study-In-Usa - Living in the USA – A Guide for PhD Students
Written by Ben Taylor As the world’s most popular study abroad destination, the USA needs little introduction. Sprawling cities, idyllic college towns and hi-tech campuses – the USA has something to offer PhD students of every type. But what’s it actually like to study and research in America? This page will give you a guide to some student essentials, from culture and transport to accommodation and work visas. On this pageStudent life. America’s 50 states are endlessly diverse, encompassing arid deserts, rugged coastlines, rolling plains and ancient forests. Sophisticated cities like New York and Boston are world-renowned higher education hubs, while specialist research institutes can be found across the country. Realistically, as a PhD student you could find yourself based anywhere in the USA – we’ll do our best to sum up what makes the United States such a great place to study and live. Culture and tourismThanks to Hollywood, we’re all pretty familiar with what the USA has to offer tourists. Iconic sights like the Grand Canyon, Yosemite National Park and Niagara Falls are among the most visited natural attractions in the world, while Disneyland(s), the glitz of Las Vegas and the lively back-alleys of New Orleans represent less sedate ways to experience America. The USA is blessed with countless significant cultural institutions, galleries and museums, and it would be impossible to do them justice here. New York City alone has the cutting-edge MoMA, the venerable Metropolitan Museum of Art and the spellbinding American Museum of Natural History. Of course, the USA is a relatively young country but you can experience its revolutionary past in vibrant cities like Boston and Philadelphia. Meanwhile, Washington DC has a world-class collection of museums with several excellent universities and research institutes. Sport and leisureSport is inescapable in America – especially at its universities, many of which boast huge stadiums that rival (or even eclipse!) the biggest ‘soccer’ stadiums over the pond in Europe. American football, ice hockey, baseball, basketball. . . wherever you study your PhD, it’s likely that you’ll be able to adopt a nearby sports team and maybe even give it a go first-hand. If you’re unsure of the rules, friendly locals will usually be more than happy to explain what everything means. In terms of non-competitive leisure activities, everything depends on the region you’re living in. You could go hiking in the Pacific Northwest’s lush rainforests, experience New England’s glorious autumnal leaves or camp out in the woods of upstate New York. Over on the West Coast, give surfing a go and catch some gnarly Californian waves (in between long stints in the lab, of course). The Rocky Mountains are renowned for snowboarding and skiing, while the Florida Keys are perfect for scuba-diving. Food and drinkAmerican cuisine is a reflection of the country’s diverse nature, taking inspiration from the immigrants – past and present – that have made America their home. The Chicago deep-pan style of pizza is a product of Italian-Americans, while Tex-Mex food is heavily influenced by Mexican delicacies. Up in New England, you can try out clam chowder and freshly-caught lobster. Twin Peaks fans shouldn’t pass up the chance to enjoy a slice of cherry pie with a pipin’ hot cup of joe at a quaint roadside diner in Washington state. It’s also worth bearing in mind that attitudes to alcohol vary widely across the States and may be quite different to what you’re used to back home. The minimum age for the consumption of alcohol is 21, although unless you’re a child prodigy this probably won’t affect you. Many states have strict curfews for the sale of alcohol. And, if you’re at a bar, it’s important to tip the bartender at least a dollar per drink! AccommodationThere’s likely to be a range of accommodation to suit every taste – and budget – wherever you choose to study your PhD in America. University dormitoriesMost universities will have their own accommodation buildings, some of which may be aimed specifically at mature graduate students. This could take the form of a self-contained studio, a shared apartment or a series of bedrooms with a shared bathroom and kitchen area. If you have a family, you may be able to apply for special accommodation. It’s fairly common for undergraduates to share a bedroom with a fellow student but this is less likely to be the case for graduate accommodation. University-owned housing will usually be cheaper than private alternatives, but competition will be tough so it pays to apply as early as possible. There will often be a choice between on- and off-campus housing, each with their own benefits. Private rentalsIf you aren’t able to secure suitable university accommodation, there will usually be a good selection of private housing – often aimed at students. You may want to rent a single apartment by yourself or share a house with likeminded individuals to split the bills. Be aware that tenants’ rights vary greatly from state to state. If you’re unsure about a particular landlord, ask your university’s international student office for advice. Living costsThe sheer size and diversity of the USA means that living costs differ widely from state to state (and even within states). In general, the North East is the most expensive region in which to live, with New York City in particular renowned for being costly. Over on the West Coast, California can be pricy. If you’re on a budget, parts of the South and the Midwest are more affordable. Prices in the USAThis table lists some average prices for typical expenses that you’ll encounter during your time in the USA. Student Cost of Living in the USA - 2024 | USD $20.00 | | USD $14.00 | | USD $80.00 | | USD $213.69 | . | Working during your PhDAccording to the conditions of your F-1 student visa, you can work on-campus for up to 20 hours a week during term-time and full-time during the holidays. If you want to work off-campus , you’ll have to satisfy strict employment conditions dictated by your student visa and wait until you’ve completed your first academic year. Your employment must fall under one of the following categories: - Optional Practical Training (OPT) – This is temporary work that is closely related to your studies, authorised for a period of up to 12 months
- Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Optional Practical Training Extension – This is an extension of OPT available to STEM students for up to 24 months
- Curricular Practical Training (CPT) – This includes work placements and opportunities that are a compulsory part of your PhD programme
In terms of working hours, you must only engage in off-campus employment for 20 hours a week during term-time and full-time during vacation. For more information, please visit the US Government’s page on student visas and employment . It’s a good idea to open an American bank account as soon as possible upon your arrival in the States. It’ll make paying for bills and groceries a lot easier, and you won’t have to worry about the fluctuations in the exchange rate between the dollar and your home currency. Most major banks offer student accounts, with perks and waived fees for those attending university. It should be fairly easy to open an account once you’ve arrived. Banks will usually require the following documents: - Student visa
- An acceptance letter from your university
- Proof of your US address
ATMs are widespread in the USA, although they do charge a transaction fee for withdrawals (often $2.50). America’s huge size can make travelling interstate seem daunting. However, the country’s extensive highway network provides plenty of opportunities for iconic road trips. If you don’t drive, Greyhound buses (and plenty of other bus companies) are a cheap way of travelling between cities. Rail travelThe USA’s railways aren’t as developed as those in Europe or parts of Asia. However, the famous Amtrak trains serve most major American cities (and a handful of Canadian ones), making for a comfortable way to experience the oft-stunning scenery of the American countryside. Domestic flights are often the best way to travel the vast distances between American cities. It takes around six hours to fly from coast to coast. Inner-city travelUrban transit options vary widely from city to city. Some – like New York City, Washington DC and Boston – have well-developed metro systems, while others are disappointingly reliant on the automobile. In general, you’ll find that American cities are much more car-centric than their European counterparts. If you don’t drive, there will usually be a relatively extensive bus network, or you can make use of local taxis and ride-hailing apps like Uber and Lyft. Find a PhD in the USAReady to start browsing some current PhD opportunities in America ? Alternatively, you can look at our other guides to PhD study abroad . Want More Updates & Advice?Everything you need to know about part-time and full-time work as a student or recent graduate in the USA. Why you'll need health insurance as an international student in the USA and how to find the right plan for you. Our guide tells you everything about the application process for studying a PhD in the USA. Our guide to PhD funding in the USA has information on fully-funded PhD scholarships, as well as other funding options for international and domestic students. Our guide tells you exactly what kind of visa you need to study a study in the USA and what you need to apply for it. We cover everything you need to know about studying in New York, including top universities, living costs, accommodation and more. FindAPhD. Copyright 2005-2024 All rights reserved. Unknown ( change ) Have you got time to answer some quick questions about PhD study? Select your nearest cityYou haven’t completed your profile yet. To get the most out of FindAPhD, finish your profile and receive these benefits: - Monthly chance to win one of ten £10 Amazon vouchers ; winners will be notified every month.*
- The latest PhD projects delivered straight to your inbox
- Access to our £6,000 scholarship competition
- Weekly newsletter with funding opportunities, research proposal tips and much more
- Early access to our physical and virtual postgraduate study fairs
Or begin browsing FindAPhD.com or begin browsing FindAPhD.com *Offer only available for the duration of your active subscription, and subject to change. You MUST claim your prize within 72 hours, if not we will redraw. Do you want hassle-free information and advice?Create your FindAPhD account and sign up to our newsletter: - Find out about funding opportunities and application tips
- Receive weekly advice, student stories and the latest PhD news
- Hear about our upcoming study fairs
- Save your favourite projects, track enquiries and get personalised subject updates
Create your accountLooking to list your PhD opportunities? Log in here . Skip to Content Current Students Interested in more? Search Courses - Search Input Submit Search
DU Professor Helps Solve Famous 70-Year-Old Math ProblemJordyn reiland. [email protected] Assistant Professor Mandi Schaeffer Fry is the first faculty member to be published in the Annals of Mathematics since the 1880s.University of Kaiserslautern Professor Gunter Malle, University of Denver Assistant Professor Mandi Schaeffer Fry and University of Valencia Professor Gabriel Navarro pose for a photo after announcing their theorem in Oberwolfach, Germany. Whether it be flying trapeze, participating in competitive weightlifting or solving math problems that have confounded academics for decades, Mandi Schaeffer Fry enjoys chasing the next adventure. Schaeffer Fry, who joined the University of Denver’s Department of Mathematics in the fall of 2023, will be the first faculty member since the 1880s to be published in the Annals of Mathematics , widely seen as the industry’s most prestigious journal. In 2022, Schaeffer Fry helped complete a problem that dates to 1955—mathematician Richard Brauer’s Height Zero Conjecture. “Maybe one of the most challenging parts, other than the math itself, was the knowledge of the weight that this would have on the field,” Schaeffer Fry says. “If you’re going to make an announcement like this, you have to be darn sure that it’s absolutely correct.” Over the years, number crunchers have worked on the problem at universities across the globe, and some found partial solutions; however, the problem was not completed until now. “Mandi’s accomplishment is exciting. Solving Brauer's Height Zero Conjecture is remarkable,” Mathematics Department Chair Alvaro Arias says. The work is also a testament to DU’s achievement as a Research 1 (R1) institution. Fry and her collaborators—University of Kaiserslautern Professor Gunter Malle, University of Valencia Professor Gabriel Navarro and Rutgers University Professor Pham Huu Tiep—worked around the clock over the course of three months in eight-hour shifts during the summer of 2022 to find a solution. In April, that work was accepted for publication in the Annals of Mathematics. 'Brauer's Height Zero Conjecture (BHZ) was the first conjecture leading to the part of my field studying 'local-global' problems in the representation theory of finite groups, which seek to relate properties of groups with properties of certain nice smaller subgroups, letting us 'zoom in' on the group using just a specific prime number and simplify things," Schaeffer Fry says. "The BHZ gives us a way to tell from the character table of a group (a table of data that encodes lots, but not all, information about the group) whether or not certain of these subgroups, called defect groups, have the commutativity property," she adds. This paper was especially meaningful to Schaeffer Fry as she had always wanted to work with Malle, Tiep and Navarro as they have been her primary mentors. Tiep was her PhD advisor and this was the first time they had worked together since then. Fry believes she has solidified her place in the field and knows she’ll likely never top this accomplishment, but she’s always looking for the next adventure—whether that’s in or out of the classroom. Flying high and pumping ironWhen Schaeffer Fry isn’t on DU’s campus working with students or conducting research, you can find her flying trapeze and competitive weightlifting. Schaeffer Fry became involved in competitive weightlifting during graduate school, and, in the last year of her PhD at the University of Arizona, she defended her dissertation one day and got on a plane and competed at the national level for “university-aged” athletes—which included Olympians. While she now lifts weights more casually, Schaeffer Fry competed last September in an over-35 competition and qualified for the USA Weightlifting Masters National Championships. It was a “field trip” during a conference in Berkeley, California, in 2018 that led Fry to become enamored with flying trapeze. In fact, she enjoyed it so much she signed up to be a member of Imperial Flyers, an amateur flying trapeze cooperative located in Westminster. Once she found out about the sport, her previous experience as a gymnast made it a natural fit. Not only is she working on her own intermediate tricks, she’s also a “teaching assistant” at Fly Mile High, the state’s only flying trapeze and aerial fitness school. “It’s exhilarating; it’s gotten me a bit over my fear of heights,” she says. Related ArticlesA Geology Expert’s Guide to Colorado’s Coolest Rock FormationsResearch to WatchStorytelling, Shaving Cream and Slime: Why Students Love Professor Nancy Sasaki |
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Doctor of Philosophy by publication A Doctor of Philosophy by publication (also known as a Ph.D. by Published Work, PhD by portfolio or Ph.D. under Special Regulation; also a thesis by publication, a thesis with publications, a publication-based thesis, an articles-based thesis, a manuscript-style dissertation, a compilation thesis and a journal format thesis [1]) is a manner of awarding a Ph ...
A PhD by publication is a less conventional doctorate gained through previously published work. Our guide explains who is eligible for this route, what it involves and how to apply.
Introduction Obtaining a PhD by publication is relatively uncommon in higher education. It can, however, be especially useful for established researchers who have published work but don't yet have a PhD. This article gives information on exactly what a PhD by publication is, how it works and what the advantages and disadvantages are. Read on to learn more.
A doctorate by published work can be approached in two ways. If you don't have a PhD, it can be researched and written as a prospective thesis, which can enable you to pursue research and journal-article production that map out a coherent path.
What is PhD published work? A PhD awarded for the submission of a portfolio of published research to the standard of a regular PhD.
The study found that there seems to be a preference for different types of PhD by publication in each of the countries. In the US they were all prospective PhDs with the work being especially written for the thesis. In the UK, by contrast, retrospective PhDs, the PhD by published work, largely dominate.
A PhD by Publication is just what it sounds like, instead of producing one large monograph, you produce a series of articles to be published in peer reviewed journals or as book chapters. The ...
The final chapter on the way forward for PhD by Publication addresses both research and practice-related concerns by suggesting future research directions and supports which can be offered to PhD by Publication supervisors and students. References Chong, S. W. (2020). PhD by published work and "doctorateness": My experience at a UK university.
PhD by Publication in the UK. This method of gaining a PhD is relatively new, (even though is important) and hence, the requirements may vary from place to place. Generally, though, instead of submitting a thesis written specifically during three/four years study with the university, you are instead required to submit a number of published papers.
Description This much-needed book provides a practical and comprehensive guide to achieving a PhD by published work. It provides an honest assessment of the pros and cons of various routes and helps readers to select the pathway that is right for them. It demystifies key processes and aspects of the award, such as navigating regulations, writing a synthesis and preparing for a viva, and ...
A PhD by publication is a postgraduate research degree that's based on research you've already undertaken and had published (excluding self-publishing) before registering with us. Depending on the subject area, peer reviewed academic papers, complete books, chapters in anthologies, or equivalent materials accepted for publication, exhibited or ...
PhD and other doctorates by published work The route to a doctorate by previously published work is currently offered by many universities, but is generally restricted to university staff, or in some cases to existing alumni.
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) is a doctoral degree that places more attention to the research and development of a new knowledge and other theoretical applications. Person can apply for PhD program that is based on the "published work" only if person already has published work; otherwise, person uses other approaches to complete PhD degree.
The Retrospective PhD by Publication provides an attractive alternative doctoral route for colleagues wishing to gain a PhD through a largely self-directed route, usually by building up a body of publications over a period of time then uniting them through a connecting narrative showing the golden thread that provides the coherence, originality ...
Bethan Jones, University of York 4 March 2022 In June 2021 I sat my viva. Not unusual for a PhD student, I hear you say. You're right. But my PhD was done via published works and in the research I did to prepare for the viva I didn't find much abou
Find out more about our PhD by Published Work course. Our PhD by Published Work is open to individuals who have already undertaken a portfolio of published research to the standard of a PhD. Warwick Medical School is home to outstanding expertise, with guidance from an academic adviser you will complete and present your published work.
Today's top 43 Phd By Published Work jobs in United States. Leverage your professional network, and get hired. New Phd By Published Work jobs added daily.
The purpose of this paper is, first, to provide a brief account of the PhD by published work focusing especially on quality assurance issues such as eligibility of candidates, the nature of the submission itself, supervision and assessment procedures. Second, it seeks to offer a discussion of the criteria to be met by candidates in writing a ...
The route to a PhD by published works requires a different approach to supervision. Here, Alison Brettle provides aspects to consider based on her experience conducting, supervising and developing institutional guidance
The PhD by Publication is an accelerated, part-time PhD award intended for those who have carried out extensive research over a significant period of time and have a number of publications arising from this work which have already been published in high-quality journals. This should not be confused with the standard PhD (3-4 years full-time ...
The PhD by published work route is intended primarily for mid-career research-active academics who, for one reason or another, haven't had the opportunity to undertake a research programme leading to a PhD. Submissions for this award will consist of a coherent body of work which is of the same quality, rigour and volume as required of a ...
PhD by Prior Publication or Existing Published. Doctor of Philosophy by Prior Publication or Existing Published or Series of Publication is a doctoral-level award and it is being awarded to the persons who have published books or articles in journals or articles in magazines or in similar means. Contents of the publications must be new ...
The Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) by publication pathway offers an alternative approach for experienced professionals who have already made significant contributions to the field of business administration through published research. It recognizes the value of practical experience and encourages candidates to leverage their expertise ...
According to the conditions of your F-1 student visa, you can work on-campus for up to 20 hours a week during term-time and full-time during the holidays.. If you want to work off-campus, you'll have to satisfy strict employment conditions dictated by your student visa and wait until you've completed your first academic year.Your employment must fall under one of the following categories:
Whether it be flying trapeze, participating in competitive weightlifting or solving math problems that have confounded academics for decades, Mandi Schaeffer Fry enjoys chasing the next adventure.Schaeffer Fry, who joined the University of Denver's Department of Mathematics in the fall of 2023, will be the first faculty member since the 1880s to be published in the Annals of Mathematics ...
Description This much-needed book provides a practical and comprehensive guide to achieving a PhD by published work. It provides an honest assessment of the pros and cons of various routes and helps readers to select the pathway that is right for them. It demystifies key processes and aspects of the award, such as navigating regulations, writing a synthesis and preparing for a viva, and ...