Mabillard, Amanda. . . 20 Aug. 2000. (date when you accessed the information) _________
Major Life Events That Shaped The Bard's Literary Career
This timeline of the legendary William Shakespeare reveals that his plays and sonnets cannot be separated. Although he was undoubtedly a genius, he was also a product of his time . Follow along and piece together both the historical and personal events that shaped the world's most influential dramatist and poet.
The life of William Shakespeare begins in April 1564 in Stratford-upon-Avon, England when he was born into a prosperous family (his father was a glove maker). Learn more about Shakespeare’s birth and early childhood, and discover the house in which he was born .
Thanks to the social standing of William Shakespeare's father, he managed to gain a place at King Edward IV Grammar School in Stratford-upon-Avon. He was schooled there between the ages of 7 and 14, where he would have been introduced to the classic texts that later informed his playwriting.
A shotgun marriage to ensure that their first child was not born out of wedlock sees the young William Shakespeare married to Anne Hathaway , daughter of a wealthy local farmer. The couple had three children together.
The life of William Shakespeare disappears from the history books for several years. This period, now known as the Lost Years , has been the subject of much speculation. Whatever happened to William in this period formed the foundations for his subsequent career and by 1592 he had established himself in London and was making a living from the stage.
With " Romeo and Juliet ", Shakespeare really makes his name as a London playwright. The play was as popular then as it is today and was regularly played at The Theatre, the predecessor to the Globe Theatre. All of Shakespeare’s early work was produced here.
In 1598, the timbers and materials for Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre were stolen and floated across the River Thames after a dispute over the lease of The Theatre became impossible to resolve. From the stolen materials of The Theatre, the now famous Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre was erected.
"Hamlet" is often described as “ the greatest play ever written ” -- remarkable when you think it’s first public production was in 1600! " Hamlet " may have been written while Shakespeare was coming to terms with the devastating news that his only son, Hamnet, had died at the young age of 11.
Shakespeare was known to Elizabeth I and had his plays had been performed to her on many occasions. She ruled during England’s so-called, “Golden Age”, a period in which artists and writers flourished. Her reign was politically unstable because she adopted Protestantism -- generating conflict with the Pope, Spain and her own Catholic citizens. Shakespeare, with his Catholic roots, drew upon this in his plays.
There is evidence to suggest that Shakespeare was a “secret” Catholic , so he may have been disappointed that the Gunpowder Plot of 1605 failed. It was a Catholic attempt to derail King James I and Protestant England -- and there is evidence that the plot was hatched in Clopton, now a suburb of Stratford-upon-Avon.
After retiring to Stratford-upon-Avon in around 1610, Shakespeare died on his 52nd birthday. By the end of his life, Shakespeare had certainly done well for himself and owned New Place , the largest house in Stratford. Although we have no record of the cause of death, there are a few theories .
You can still visit Shakespeare’s grave today -- and read the curse written upon his tomb.
By Barbara Mowat and Paul Werstine Editors of the Folger Shakespeare Library Editions
Listen to this essay:
Surviving documents that give us glimpses into the life of William Shakespeare show us a playwright, poet, and actor who grew up in the market town of Stratford-upon-Avon, spent his professional life in London, and returned to Stratford a wealthy landowner. He was born in April 1564, died in April 1616, and is buried inside the chancel of Holy Trinity Church in Stratford.
We wish we could know more about the life of the world’s greatest dramatist. His plays and poems are testaments to his wide reading—especially to his knowledge of Virgil, Ovid, Plutarch, Holinshed’s Chronicles , and the Bible—and to his mastery of the English language, but we can only speculate about his education. We know that the King’s New School in Stratford-upon-Avon was considered excellent. The school was one of the English “grammar schools” established to educate young men, primarily in Latin grammar and literature. As in other schools of the time, students began their studies at the age of four or five in the attached “petty school,” and there learned to read and write in English, studying primarily the catechism from the Book of Common Prayer. After two years in the petty school, students entered the lower form (grade) of the grammar school, where they began the serious study of Latin grammar and Latin texts that would occupy most of the remainder of their school days. (Several Latin texts that Shakespeare used repeatedly in writing his plays and poems were texts that schoolboys memorized and recited.) Latin comedies were introduced early in the lower form; in the upper form, which the boys entered at age ten or eleven, students wrote their own Latin orations and declamations, studied Latin historians and rhetoricians, and began the study of Greek using the Greek New Testament.
Title page of a 1573 Latin and Greek catechism for children. From Alexander Nowell, Catechismus paruus pueris primum Latine . . . (1573).
Since the records of the Stratford “grammar school” do not survive, we cannot prove that William Shakespeare attended the school; however, every indication (his father’s position as an alderman and bailiff of Stratford, the playwright’s own knowledge of the Latin classics, scenes in the plays that recall grammar-school experiences—for example, The Merry Wives of Windsor , 4.1 ) suggests that he did. We also lack generally accepted documentation about Shakespeare’s life after his schooling ended and his professional life in London began. His marriage in 1582 (at age eighteen) to Anne Hathaway and the subsequent births of his daughter Susanna (1583) and the twins Judith and Hamnet (1585) are recorded, but how he supported himself and where he lived are not known. Nor do we know when and why he left Stratford for the London theatrical world, nor how he rose to be the important figure in that world that he had become by the early 1590s.
We do know that by 1592 he had achieved some prominence in London as both an actor and a playwright. In that year was published a book by the playwright Robert Greene attacking an actor who had the audacity to write blank-verse drama and who was “in his own conceit [i.e., opinion] the only Shake-scene in a country.” Since Greene’s attack includes a parody of a line from one of Shakespeare’s early plays, there is little doubt that it is Shakespeare to whom he refers, a “Shake-scene” who had aroused Greene’s fury by successfully competing with university-educated dramatists like Greene himself. It was in 1593 that Shakespeare became a published poet. In that year he published his long narrative poem Venus and Adonis ; in 1594, he followed it with The Rape of Lucrece. Both poems were dedicated to the young earl of Southampton (Henry Wriothesley), who may have become Shakespeare’s patron.
It seems no coincidence that Shakespeare wrote these narrative poems at a time when the theaters were closed because of the plague, a contagious epidemic disease that devastated the population of London. When the theaters reopened in 1594, Shakespeare apparently resumed his double career of actor and playwright and began his long (and seemingly profitable) service as an acting-company shareholder. Records for December of 1594 show him to be a leading member of the Lord Chamberlain’s Men. It was this company of actors, later named the King’s Men, for whom he would be a principal actor, dramatist, and shareholder for the rest of his career.
So far as we can tell, that career spanned about twenty years. In the 1590s, he wrote his plays on English history as well as several comedies and at least two tragedies ( Titus Andronicus and Romeo and Juliet ). These histories, comedies, and tragedies are the plays credited to him in 1598 in a work, Palladis Tamia , that in one chapter compares English writers with “Greek, Latin, and Italian Poets.” There the author, Francis Meres, claims that Shakespeare is comparable to the Latin dramatists Seneca for tragedy and Plautus for comedy, and calls him “the most excellent in both kinds for the stage.” He also names him “Mellifluous and honey-tongued Shakespeare”: “I say,” writes Meres, “that the Muses would speak with Shakespeare’s fine filed phrase, if they would speak English.” Since Meres also mentions Shakespeare’s “sugared sonnets among his private friends,” it is assumed that many of Shakespeare’s sonnets (not published until 1609) were also written in the 1590s.
In 1599, Shakespeare’s company built a theater for themselves across the river from London, naming it the Globe. The plays that are considered by many to be Shakespeare’s major tragedies ( Hamlet , Othello , King Lear , and Macbeth ) were written while the company was resident in this theater, as were such comedies as Twelfth Night and Measure for Measure . Many of Shakespeare’s plays were performed at court (both for Queen Elizabeth I and, after her death in 1603, for King James I), some were presented at the Inns of Court (the residences of London’s legal societies), and some were doubtless performed in other towns, at the universities, and at great houses when the King’s Men went on tour; otherwise, his plays from 1599 to 1608 were, so far as we know, performed only at the Globe. Between 1608 and 1612, Shakespeare wrote several plays—among them The Winter’s Tale and The Tempest —presumably for the company’s new indoor Blackfriars theater, though the plays were performed also at the Globe and at court. Surviving documents describe a performance of The Winter’s Tale in 1611 at the Globe, for example, and performances of The Tempest in 1611 and 1613 at the royal palace of Whitehall.
Shakespeare seems to have written very little after 1612, the year in which he probably wrote King Henry VIII . (It was at a performance of Henry VIII in 1613 that the Globe caught fire and burned to the ground.) Sometime between 1610 and 1613, according to many biographers, he returned to live in Stratford-upon-Avon, where he owned a large house and considerable property, and where his wife and his two daughters lived. (His son Hamnet had died in 1596.) However, other biographers suggest that Shakespeare did not leave London for good until much closer to the time of his death. During his professional years in London, Shakespeare had presumably derived income from the acting company’s profits as well as from his own career as an actor, from the sale of his play manuscripts to the acting company, and, after 1599, from his shares as an owner of the Globe. It was presumably that income, carefully invested in land and other property, that made him the wealthy man that surviving documents show him to have become. It is also assumed that William Shakespeare’s growing wealth and reputation played some part in inclining the Crown, in 1596, to grant John Shakespeare, William’s father, the coat of arms that he had so long sought. William Shakespeare died in Stratford on April 23, 1616 (according to the epitaph carved under his bust in Holy Trinity Church) and was buried on April 25. Seven years after his death, his collected plays were published as Mr. William Shakespeares Comedies, Histories, & Tragedies (the work now known as the First Folio).
Ptolemaic universe. From Marcus Manilius, The sphere of . . . (1675).
The years in which Shakespeare wrote were among the most exciting in English history. Intellectually, the discovery, translation, and printing of Greek and Roman classics were making available a set of works and worldviews that interacted complexly with Christian texts and beliefs. The result was a questioning, a vital intellectual ferment, that provided energy for the period’s amazing dramatic and literary output and that fed directly into Shakespeare’s plays. The Ghost in Hamlet , for example, is wonderfully complicated in part because he is a figure from Roman tragedy—the spirit of the dead returning to seek revenge—who at the same time inhabits a Christian hell (or purgatory); Hamlet’s description of humankind reflects at one moment the Neoplatonic wonderment at mankind (“ What a piece of work is a man! ”) and, at the next, the Christian attitude toward sinful humanity (“ And yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust? ”).
As intellectual horizons expanded, so also did geographical and cosmological horizons. New worlds—both North and South America—were explored, and in them were found human beings who lived and worshiped in ways radically different from those of Renaissance Europeans and Englishmen. The universe during these years also seemed to shift and expand. Copernicus had earlier theorized that the earth was not the center of the cosmos but revolved as a planet around the sun. Galileo’s telescope, created in 1609, allowed scientists to see that Copernicus had been correct: the universe was not organized with the earth at the center, nor was it so nicely circumscribed as people had, until that time, thought. In terms of expanding horizons, the impact of these discoveries on people’s beliefs—religious, scientific, and philosophical—cannot be overstated.
London, too, rapidly expanded and changed during the years (from the early 1590s to around 1610) that Shakespeare lived there. London—the center of England’s government, its economy, its royal court, its overseas trade—was, during these years, becoming an exciting metropolis, drawing to it thousands of new citizens every year. Troubled by overcrowding, by poverty, by recurring epidemics of the plague, London was also a mecca for the wealthy and the aristocratic, and for those who sought advancement at court, or power in government or finance or trade. One hears in Shakespeare’s plays the voices of London—the struggles for power, the fear of venereal disease, the language of buying and selling. One hears as well the voices of Stratford-upon-Avon—references to the nearby Forest of Arden, to sheepherding, to small-town gossip, to village fairs and markets. Part of the richness of Shakespeare’s work is the influence felt there of the various worlds in which he lived: the world of metropolitan London, the world of small-town and rural England, the world of the theater, and the worlds of craftsmen and shepherds.
That Shakespeare inhabited such worlds we know from surviving London and Stratford documents, as well as from the evidence of the plays and poems themselves. From such records we can sketch the dramatist’s life. We know from his works that he was a voracious reader. We know from legal and business documents that he was a multifaceted theater man who became a wealthy landowner. We know a bit about his family life and a fair amount about his legal and financial dealings. Most scholars today depend upon such evidence as they draw their picture of the world’s greatest playwright. Such, however, has not always been the case. Until the late eighteenth century, the William Shakespeare who lived in most biographies was the creation of legend and tradition. This was the Shakespeare who was supposedly caught poaching deer at Charlecote, the estate of Sir Thomas Lucy close by Stratford; this was the Shakespeare who fled from Sir Thomas’s vengeance and made his way in London by taking care of horses outside a playhouse; this was the Shakespeare who reportedly could barely read, but whose natural gifts were extraordinary, whose father was a butcher who allowed his gifted son sometimes to help in the butcher shop, where William supposedly killed calves “in a high style,” making a speech for the occasion. It was this legendary William Shakespeare whose Falstaff (in 1 and 2 Henry IV ) so pleased Queen Elizabeth that she demanded a play about Falstaff in love, and demanded that it be written in fourteen days (hence the existence of The Merry Wives of Windsor ). It was this legendary Shakespeare who reached the top of his acting career in the roles of the Ghost in Hamlet and old Adam in As You Like It —and who died of a fever contracted by drinking too hard at “a merry meeting” with the poets Michael Drayton and Ben Jonson. This legendary Shakespeare is a rambunctious, undisciplined man, as attractively “wild” as his plays were seen by earlier generations to be. Unfortunately, there is no trace of evidence to support these wonderful stories.
Perhaps in response to the disreputable Shakespeare of legend—or perhaps in response to the fragmentary and, for some, all-too-ordinary Shakespeare documented by surviving records—some people since the mid-nineteenth century have argued that William Shakespeare could not have written the plays that bear his name. These persons have put forward some dozen names as more likely authors, among them Queen Elizabeth, Sir Francis Bacon, Edward de Vere (earl of Oxford), and Christopher Marlowe. Such attempts to find what for these people is a more believable author of the plays is a tribute to the regard in which the plays are held. Unfortunately for their claims, the documents that exist that provide evidence for the facts of Shakespeare’s life tie him inextricably to the body of plays and poems that bear his name. Unlikely as it seems to those who want the works to have been written by an aristocrat, a university graduate, or an “important” person, the plays and poems seem clearly to have been produced by a man from Stratford-upon-Avon with a very good “grammar-school” education and a life of experience in London and in the world of the London theater. How this particular man produced the works that dominate the cultures of much of the world four centuries after his death is one of life’s mysteries—and one that will continue to tease our imaginations as we continue to delight in his plays and poems.
Baldwin, T. W. William Shakspere’s Petty School. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1943.
Baldwin here investigates the theory and practice of the petty school, the first level of education in Elizabethan England. He focuses on that educational system primarily as it is reflected in Shakespeare’s art.
Baldwin, T. W. William Shakspere’s Small Latine and Lesse Greeke. 2 vols. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1944.
Baldwin attacks the view that Shakespeare was an uneducated genius—a view that had been dominant among Shakespeareans since the eighteenth century. Instead, Baldwin shows, the educational system of Shakespeare’s time would have given the playwright a strong background in the classics, and there is much in the plays that shows how Shakespeare benefited from such an education.
Beier, A. L., and Roger Finlay, eds. London 1500–1700: The Making of the Metropolis. New York: Longman, 1986.
Focusing on the economic and social history of early modern London, these collected essays probe aspects of metropolitan life, including “Population and Disease,” “Commerce and Manufacture,” and “Society and Change.”
Chambers, E. K. William Shakespeare: A Study of Facts and Problems. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930.
Analyzing in great detail the scant historical data, Chambers’s complex, scholarly study considers the nature of the texts in which Shakespeare’s work is preserved.
Cressy, David. Education in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Edward Arnold, 1975.
This volume collects sixteenth-, seventeenth-, and early eighteenth-century documents detailing aspects of formal education in England, such as the curriculum, the control and organization of education, and the education of women.
Duncan-Jones, Katherine. Shakespeare: An Ungentle Life. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2010.
This biography, first published in 2001 under the title Ungentle Shakespeare: Scenes from His Life, sets out to look into the documents from Shakespeare’s personal life—especially legal and financial records—and it finds there a man very different from the one portrayed in more traditional biographies. He is “ungentle” in being born to a lower social class and in being a bit ruthless and more than a bit stingy. As the author notes, “three topics were formerly taboo both in polite society and in Shakespearean biography: social class, sex and money. I have been indelicate enough to give a good deal of attention to all three.” She examines “Shakespeare’s uphill struggle to achieve, or purchase, ‘gentle’ status.” She finds that “Shakespeare was strongly interested in intense relationships with well-born young men.” And she shows that he was “reluctant to divert much, if any, of his considerable wealth towards charitable, neighbourly, or altruistic ends.” She insists that his plays and poems are “great, and enduring,” and that it is in them “that the best of him is to be found.”
Dutton, Richard. William Shakespeare: A Literary Life. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1989.
Not a biography in the traditional sense, Dutton’s very readable work nevertheless “follows the contours of Shakespeare’s life” as it examines Shakespeare’s career as playwright and poet, with consideration of his patrons, theatrical associations, and audience.
Honan, Park. Shakespeare: A Life. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Honan’s accessible biography focuses on the various contexts of Shakespeare’s life—physical, social, political, and cultural—to place the dramatist within a lucidly described world. The biography includes detailed examinations of, for example, Stratford schooling, theatrical politics of 1590s London, and the careers of Shakespeare’s associates. The author draws on a wealth of established knowledge and on interesting new research into local records and documents; he also engages in speculation about, for example, the possibilities that Shakespeare was a tutor in a Catholic household in the north of England in the 1580s and that he acted particular roles in his own plays, areas that reflect new, but unproven and debatable, data—though Honan is usually careful to note where a particular narrative “has not been capable of proof or disproof.”
Potter, Lois. The Life of William Shakespeare: A Critical Biography. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.
This critical biography of Shakespeare takes the playwright from cradle to grave, paying primary attention to his literary and theatrical milieu. The chapters “follow a chronological sequence,” each focusing on a handful of years in the playwright’s life. In the chapters that cover his playwriting years (5–17), each chapter focuses on events in Stratford-upon-Avon and in London (especially in the commercial theaters) while giving equal space to discussions of the plays and/or poems Shakespeare wrote during those years. Filled with information from Shakespeare’s literary and theatrical worlds, the biography also shares frequent insights into how modern productions of a given play can shed light on the play, especially in scenes that Shakespeare’s text presents ambiguously.
Schoenbaum, S. William Shakespeare: A Compact Documentary Life. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977.
Schoenbaum’s evidence-based biography of Shakespeare is a compact version of his magisterial folio-size Shakespeare: A Documentary Life (New York: Oxford University Press, 1975). Schoenbaum structures his readable “compact” narrative around the documents that still exist which chronicle Shakespeare’s familial, theatrical, legal, and financial existence. These documents, along with those discovered since the 1970s, form the basis of almost all Shakespeare biographies written since Schoenbaum’s books appeared.
Find out what’s on, read our latest stories, and learn how you can get involved.
An immense database of early modern plays reveals “a veritable avian community, a magpie nest, each writer borrowing from each other”
Robert White Books 19 September 2024 1416 words
Reading and listening: detail from the “Chandos portrait” of Shakespeare. Alamy
Leaving aside the fringe-dwellers who don’t believe “the Stratford man” wrote any of the plays published under his name, attribution scholars have employed sophisticated, increasingly computerised “stylometric” methodologies to ascertain exactly which parts, lines and phrases in each play attributed to Shakespeare were written by the playwright himself, and which by other writers. Despite the apparently scientific deployment of evidence, however, the results are by no means settled among the various exponents.
The one major point of agreement within this intimidating and contentious branch of Shakespeare research is that the Romantic-era genius writing in splendid isolation has been well and truly swept away, to be replaced by a figure who was one of many in an Elizabethan community of collaborating playwrights who were also actors and shareholders in London’s theatrical companies.
Nonetheless, and to keep things in perspective, we need not abandon our regard for a singular Shakespeare as a master-craftsman of the stage. Will Sharpe’s measured approach in Shakespeare and Collaborative Writing (2023) shows that the wholly collaborative plays of which he was joint author were written only in his early apprenticeship years ( Titus Andronicus and the Henry VI plays) and when he had semi-retired at the end of his career ( Pericles , Henry VIII and The Two Noble Kinsmen ), which leaves all those between (except Timon of Athens ) as written alone and unaided.
Thus, as Darren Freebury-Jones shows in his new book, Shakespeare’s Borrowed Feathers , the vast majority of plays in the First Folio (a kind of posthumous publishing collaboration) are entirely single-authored, marked by Shakespeare’s inimitable, chameleon-like and richly metaphorical signature style, though replete also with recontextualised verbal “borrowings” from fellow dramatists and writers. We need not worry that Shakespeare’s pre-eminence, recognised by the Folio editors and contemporaries, will be swept away by the view that the plays we value were compiled by committee.
Freebury-Jones voices some doubts about other authorship schools, in particular the New Oxford Shakespeare team led by Stanley Wells, Gary Taylor and John Jowett in the 1980s, which radically changed the editorial landscape towards acknowledging collaboration. But he turns away from debates about systematic collaborations and conscious adaptations to peg out his own allotment. His interest is in the extent to which Shakespeare was influenced by the verbal constructions of his contemporaries, in some of whose plays he himself acted.
To do this, he uses a recent computer database with what must be the most forbidding title imaginable for a work on drama, Collocations and N-Grams , developed by digital scholar Pervez Rizvi. This resource has digitised an almost complete collection of the surviving texts of 527 early modern plays dated between 1552 and 1657, enabling us speedily and in granular detail to find matches of words and phrases between plays.
Freebury-Jones recognises that this “treasure trove” enables a scholar to identify with great precision mutual influences between dramatists repeating exact shared word sequences (“n-grams”) and matching phrases spliced with intervening words (“collocations”). These he analyses to identify Shakespeare’s “borrowed feathers,” pillaged from or shared with his contemporary writers. The result is a “revelation” of micro-level verbal mirroring that doesn’t rely on assumptions of joint authorship but instead on mutual influences, some stronger than others. And when he does raise his eyes above the computer spreadsheets, he reveals himself to be a sensitively close reader, showing how shared phrases are purposefully adapted to illuminate different dramatic contexts.
Freebury-Jones does intervene in attribution studies in some cases, for example arguing that collaboration between Shakespeare and Christopher Marlowe in the Henry VI plays may have been overstated and that Thomas Kyd is a stronger presence in Shakespeare’s works than otherwise believed. But his main focus is on linguistic and dramatic influence between dramatists, and in these stakes even Shakespeare’s self-styled rival Robert Greene has claims: “Greene’s feathers, far more colourful than often credited, helped the works of later playwrights to take flight.”
Professional ties were also social, and Freebury-Jones provides at the beginning of each chapter entertaining pen-portraits of a motley range of personalities before moving to the nitty-gritty of their stylistic influence on Shakespeare. For these alone the book might reach a more general audience, though Stanley Wells’s authoritative Shakespeare and Co. (2006) provides more biographical detail.
Among the subjects of Freebury-Jones’s portraits is the playwright John Lyly, now largely forgotten, who pioneered a new kind of dramaturgy written for boy actors with mixed genres from which Shakespeare forged romantic comedy, and a uniquely scholastic style that became famous in his time as “euphuism” and which Shakespeare parodies. Marlowe burst on the theatrical scene with his altogether more volcanic presence, carrying the racy aura of espionage, while Kyd, his early room-mate, was probably unjustly caught up in accusations of crime, tainted by association. Freebury-Jones shows that both were enormously influential over Shakespeare.
Robert Greene, who famously announced to the coterie world of playmakers the emergence of an “upstart Crow, beautified with our feathers” as “the only Shake-scene in a countrey,” was dogged by lifelong penury and suffered an early and infamous death. Ben Jonson, who (unlike Marlowe) lived to be Shakespeare’s main dramatic rival and frenemy, was turbulently implicated in a criminal underworld, providing jargon and a rogues’ gallery of characters to the dramatic repertoire.
And on we go through a range of writers including Peele, Dekker, Marston and Middleton, ending with John Fletcher, who was accepted as the true heir by fully collaborating on at least the two last plays in the Shakespearean canon.
Freebury-Jones’s detailed evidence builds towards an argument that the Elizabethan and Jacobean theatrical world was a community of writers who were acquaintances, rivals and hired journeymen, and that they freely borrowed “feathers” from each other in openly intertextual fashion. In an age when literary imitation was a central plank of humanist education at school, it is not surprising that early modern drama was “a veritable avian community, a magpie nest, each writer borrowing from each other” and that many of the borrowings would have often been recognised by audiences.
Though lacking attributions by name (and in an age before strict copyright laws operated), the process was perhaps not so different in spirit from modern scholars scrupulously documenting their sources and acknowledging friends and teachers who have contributed suggestions and inspiration that enhance the autonomy of the final product. This did not always pre-empt charges of plagiarism or professional rancour though Shakespeare seems to have avoided these through his adroitly adapted recoinings to new contexts and uses.
Freebury-Jones has some of his own stylistic habits. For example, he often half-advances a stimulating hypothesis but then coyly half-retracts it as unprovable — “Was Peele Shakespeare’s first co-author?”; “Are we witnessing Shakespeare’s recall of lines he delivered on stage here?” — signalling findings that are tentative and pointing to new searches.
Armed with the Collocations and N-Grams database of plays as his primary research tool, Freebury-Jones necessarily tells only a portion of the story of Shakespeare’s stylistic borrowings and evolution. The playwright was also an avid and deep reader of prose and poems, and we would need a computer cache even more voluminous to explore this wider terrain of influence.
After all, among Shakespeare’s primary sources were Holinshed’s Chronicles for all the English history plays, North’s translation of Plutarch’s Lives of the Noble Greeks and Romans for the Greco-Roman plays, and almost certainly the huge output in poetry and translations by George Chapman (perhaps the “rival poet” of the sonnets). In developing his unique brand of romantic comedy Shakespeare dramatised Thomas Lodge’s prose fiction Rosalynde , while the late romance tragi-comedy The Winter’s Tale was based on Robert Greene’s Pandosto . Moreover, Shakespeare shows keen appreciation of Sir Philip Sidney’s lengthy Arcadia , the most celebrated proto-novelistic romance of the period, and Spenser’s allegorical epic The Faerie Queene , which held the same lofty status in poetry.
Specific episodes Shakespeare adapted for the stage have been thoroughly dredged by Freebury-Jones and others, but these are all huge works that Shakespeare had evidently read and learned from. Alert to contemporary popular fashions and on the lookout for novel language and analogues, he had also evidently read some of the many pamphlets describing rogue life in the Elizabethan criminal world. Plenty more grist to the mill for scholars in their own collaborative task of re-creation. •
Shakespeare’s Borrowed Feathers: How Early Modern Playwrights Shaped the World’s Greatest Writer By Darren Freebury-Jones | Manchester University Press | £25 | 272 pages
Robert White has been Senior Lecturer at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Winthrop Professor of English at the University of Western Australia and a Chief Investigator in the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in the History of Emotions 1100–1800. His latest books are John Keats’s Anatomy of Melancholy: The 1820 Collection (2020) and Shakespeare Against War: Pacifist Readings (2024).
Topics: biography | books | poetry | theatre
Three times a week in your inbox…
Back to top
© 2024 Inside Story and contributors | ISSN 1837-0497
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
William Shakespeare is one of the most famous English playwright, poets, and actors. He is viewed as the supreme writer in English literature and the greatest dramatist of the world. He is also called as the national poet of England and the "Bard of Avon.". He has written 154 sonnets, few other verses, two long narrative poems, and 39 plays.
William was one of six children born to John Shakespeare and Mary Arden, and he grew up in Stratford-upon-Avon (a busy town along the Avon River, about 100 miles from London) ("William Shakespeare"). In 1582, Shakespeare married Anne Hathaway and had three children. In 1590, Shakespeare and his family had moved to London where he worked for ...
William Shakespeare's first plays were written in the conventional style of the day. He wrote them in a stylised language that does not always spring naturally from the needs of the characters or the drama. [ 1 ] The poetry depends on extended, elaborate metaphors and conceits, and the language is often rhetorical —written for actors to ...
William Shakespeare (baptized April 26, 1564, Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire, England—died April 23, 1616, Stratford-upon-Avon) was a poet, dramatist, and actor often called the English national poet. He is considered by many to be the greatest dramatist of all time. Shakespeare occupies a position unique in world literature.Other poets, such as Homer and Dante, and novelists, such as Leo ...
6,796. William Shakespeare is one of the most influential writers in the world today. His works are studied in schools and colleges, while critics find new themes in his plays and poems to examine. Of course, it wasn't always that way. We will write a custom essay specifically for you by our professional experts.
William Shakespeare was an English poet, playwright, and actor of the Renaissance era. He was an important member of the King's Men theatrical company from roughly 1594 onward. Known throughout ...
His writing style influenced a large number of renowned writers such as Charles Dickens, Maya Angelou, John Keats, and Herman Melville. Various writers and poets use his style as a guiding model for writing plays and poetry. Also, genres of tragedy, comedy, and tragi-comedy owe a great deal to Shakespeare for popularity and universal recognition.
William Shakespeare was a renowned English poet, playwright, and actor born in 1564 in Stratford-upon-Avon.His birthday is most commonly celebrated on 23 April (see When was Shakespeare born), which is also believed to be the date he died in 1616. Shakespeare was a prolific writer during the Elizabethan and Jacobean ages of British theatre (sometimes called the English Renaissance or the Early ...
William Shakespeare (c. 23 [a] April 1564 - 23 April 1616) [b] was an English playwright, poet and actor.He is widely regarded as the greatest writer in the English language and the world's pre-eminent dramatist. [4] [5] [6] He is often called England's national poet and the "Bard of Avon" (or simply "the Bard").His extant works, including collaborations, consist of some 39 plays, 154 ...
Bate 2009 uses information about early modern life and theater to create a portrait of Shakespeare's life based on his own writing techniques and style. Greenblatt 2004 and Potter 2012 analyze his canon for clues about his personal life, drawing data from his characters and plot devices. Ackroyd, Peter. Shakespeare: The Biography. New York ...
1. demonstrate an understanding of themes and characters in three of Shakespeare's most important plays. 2. demonstrate an understanding of language and literary structure in Shakespeare's ...
William Shakespeare. 1564—1616. Circa 1600, English playwright and poet William Shakespeare (1564-1616). (Photo by Stock Montage/Getty Images) While William Shakespeare's reputation is based primarily on his plays, he became famous first as a poet. With the partial exception of the Sonnets (1609), quarried since the early 19th century for ...
Between the mid-1590s and his retirement around 1612, Shakespeare penned the most famous of his 37-plus plays, including "Romeo and Juliet," "A Midsummer Night's Dream," "Hamlet ...
Today, Shakespeare is considered to be one of, if not the, most important English-language writers of all time. His plays and poems are read all over the world. Shakespeare may be best known for his plays, such as Romeo and Juliet and Macbeth, but he also wrote 154 sonnets and several long poems that proved his skill in this style as well.
William Shakespeare (1564-1616). English poet and playwright - Shakespeare is widely considered to be the greatest writer in the English language. He wrote 38 plays and 154 sonnets. Short bio of William Shakespeare. William Shakespeare was born in Stratford-upon-Avon on 23rd April 1564. His father William was a successful local businessman ...
William Shakespeare was an actor, playwright, poet, and theatre entrepreneur in London during the late Elizabethan and early Jacobean eras. He was baptised on 26 April 1564 [a] in Stratford-upon-Avon in Warwickshire, England, in the Holy Trinity Church. At the age of 18, he married Anne Hathaway, with whom he had three children.
William Shakespeare (April 23, 1564-April 23, 1616) wrote at least 37 plays and 154 sonnets, which are considered among the most important and enduring ever written. Although the plays have captured the imagination of theatergoers for centuries, some historians claim that Shakespeare didn't actually write them.
Devices in the epic poems of Homer run through Shakespeare's poetry: Alliteration - the repetition of similar sounds, usually consonants or consonant clusters in a group of words, is one of the staples of Shakespeare's verse and indeed, one of the building blocks of poetry generally. Romeo and Juliet begins with this memorable statement ...
Writing verse, or tight, vigorous prose, is an athletic skill, involving muscle memory and unconscious processing. As time went on there was more wrist in Shakespeare's language game, giving it increased subtlety and power. ... But Shakespeare's style also matured simply because he got older, because he saw life differently as he saw more ...
Shakespeare used a metrical pattern consisting of lines of unrhymed iambic pentameter, called blank verse. His plays were composed using blank verse, although there are passages in all the plays that deviate from the norm and are composed of other forms of poetry and/or simple prose. Shakespeare's sonnets are written in iambic pentameter, with ...
The life of William Shakespeare begins in April 1564 in Stratford-upon-Avon, England when he was born into a prosperous family (his father was a glove maker). Learn more about Shakespeare's birth and early childhood, and discover the. Thanks to the social standing of William Shakespeare's father, he managed to gain a place at King Edward IV ...
Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. This critical biography of Shakespeare takes the playwright from cradle to grave, paying primary attention to his literary and theatrical milieu. The chapters "follow a chronological sequence," each focusing on a handful of years in the playwright's life.
Among the subjects of Freebury-Jones's portraits is the playwright John Lyly, now largely forgotten, who pioneered a new kind of dramaturgy written for boy actors with mixed genres from which Shakespeare forged romantic comedy, and a uniquely scholastic style that became famous in his time as "euphuism" and which Shakespeare parodies.