essay on professional ethics in law

What is Professional Ethics in Law?

• Subject-wise Law Notes
• Aishwarya Agrawal
• June 3, 2023

Professional ethics in law refers to the set of moral principles and standards that guide the behaviour and conduct of legal professionals. It encompasses the values and obligations that lawyers and advocates must uphold while practising law. 

The importance of professional ethics in the legal profession cannot be overstated, as they form the foundation for maintaining integrity, ensuring justice and upholding the rule of law. 

Meaning of Professional Ethics

Professional Ethics refers to a collection of guidelines that an aspiring lawyer must adhere to. These guidelines govern the behaviour and actions of practising lawyers, encompassing their interactions with themselves, clients, opposing parties and the court. 

Ethics generally pertains to the moral principles that should serve as standards for a lawyer’s conduct. Professional Ethics serves as a foundation for any profession, embodying the fundamental values upon which the legal profession is constructed.

The Role of Professional Ethics in Law

Professional ethics play a crucial role in the legal profession in India, serving as the bedrock for upholding the rule of law and justice.

Upholding the rule of law and justice

Professional ethics ensure that lawyers and advocates adhere to legal principles and procedures, thereby preserving the justice system’s integrity. Legal professionals contribute to a just and orderly society by upholding the rule of law.

Maintaining public trust and confidence

Professional ethics are essential for maintaining public trust in the legal profession. When lawyers and advocates conduct themselves ethically, the public’s confidence in the legal system is reinforced. This trust is vital for the effective functioning of the legal system in India.

Ensuring fairness and impartiality

Professional ethics require legal professionals to provide fair and impartial representation to their clients. By upholding ethical standards, lawyers ensure that justice is not only served but also perceived as fair and unbiased.

Fostering integrity and accountability

Professional ethics promote integrity and accountability within the legal profession. Lawyers are expected to act honestly, ethically and with the utmost integrity in all their professional dealings. Adherence to ethical standards fosters a sense of responsibility and accountability, enhancing the legal profession’s reputation.

Key Principles of Professional Ethics in Law

Several core principles form the foundation of professional ethics in law in India. Confidentiality and attorney-client privilege are fundamental, ensuring clients can trust their lawyers with sensitive information. Competence and diligent representation require lawyers to maintain a high standard of knowledge and skill to serve their clients effectively. 

Avoiding conflicts of interest is crucial to safeguard the integrity of the legal process. Honesty and truthfulness are essential for maintaining the credibility of lawyers. Professional courtesy and respect promote a healthy and dignified work environment. Pro Bono service and access to justice highlight the responsibility of lawyers to provide legal assistance to those in need.

Challenges in Maintaining Professional Ethics in Law

While professional ethics provide a guiding framework, lawyers in India face various challenges in upholding them. The pressure to win at all costs can sometimes tempt lawyers to compromise ethical standards. 

Balancing client advocacy with ethical obligations can present ethical dilemmas. Dealing with difficult clients and unethical colleagues poses challenges that require ethical fortitude. The advent of technology and social media also introduces new ethical considerations that lawyers must navigate.

Ethical Dilemmas in the Legal Profession

The legal profession is not immune to ethical dilemmas. Confidentiality versus duty to disclose arises when lawyers must weigh their duty to protect client information against the greater public interest. 

The tension between zealous advocacy and fairness can challenge the ethical boundaries of lawyers. Conflicts of interest and dual representation raise questions about loyalty and impartiality. Additionally, handling client dishonesty requires lawyers to tread carefully while maintaining ethical standards.

Consequences of Ethical Violations

Ethical violations in the legal profession can have severe consequences. Disciplinary actions and professional sanctions may be imposed by regulatory bodies, resulting in a tarnished professional reputation. Moreover, ethical violations can lead to losing the trust of clients, colleagues and the public. Legal and financial consequences can also arise from professional misconduct.

Promoting and Upholding Professional Ethics

Several measures must be taken to ensure adherence to professional ethics in India. Continuing legal education and ethical training are imperative to keep lawyers updated on ethical standards and emerging challenges. Ethical guidelines and codes of conduct provide a framework for ethical behaviour. 

Professional associations and bar organisations are crucial in promoting ethical conduct and providing guidance. Mentorship and ethical leadership contribute to cultivating ethical values among legal professionals.

Code of Professional Responsibility

The principles and guidelines that govern professional responsibility in the legal field consist of three interrelated components: canons, ethical considerations and disciplinary rules.

Canons are generally accepted rules, standards or principles by which something is judged. In the context of professional ethics in law, canons outline the obligations and responsibilities of lawyers. These canons include upholding the Constitution, obeying the laws of the land and promoting respect for the legal system. Lawyers are expected to refrain from engaging in dishonest, immoral, unlawful and deceitful conduct.

Ethical Considerations

Ethical considerations encompass values and principles that determine what is considered morally right or wrong within the legal profession. In the legal context, ethical considerations involve confidentiality, informed consent, anonymity, prevention of harm, voluntary participation and access to relevant information.

Disciplinary Rules

Disciplinary rules are mandatory regulations that define the minimum standards of professional conduct required to avoid disciplinary action. These rules are designed to promote fairness and consistency in the treatment of individuals. They provide guidelines for the ethical behaviour expected from lawyers.

Code of Conduct Prescribed for Advocates

The Advocates Act of 1961 is legislation aimed at amending and consolidating laws about legal practitioners in India. It provides guidelines for the establishment of Bar Councils and the All-India Bar. The Act is a revised version of the Indian Bar Council Act of 1926 and outlines various duties and responsibilities for advocates, including:

• Prohibition of Advertising and Soliciting Work: Advocates are prohibited from engaging in advertising or soliciting work.
• Prohibition of Demanding Fees for Training: Advocates cannot demand fees for providing training.
• Consent for Entering Appearance: Advocates must obtain the consent of an already engaged advocate before entering an appearance in a case.
• Prohibition of Unauthorised Use of Name or Services: Advocates are not permitted to use their name or services for unauthorised practices.

Chapter II, Part IV of the Bar Council of India contains rules regarding professional standards that advocates must adhere to, as specified under Section 49(1)(c) of the Advocates Act, 1961.

The Act prescribes rules regarding the duties of advocates towards the court, clients, opponents and fellow advocates along with the rights of advocates . These rules encompass a range of conduct that advocates must follow. Some of the key rules include:

Duty towards the Court

• Acting in a dignified manner.
• Respecting the court.
• Refraining from engaging in illegal conduct towards the opposition.
• Maintaining a proper dress code.
• Avoiding involvement in matters related to financial interest.

Duty towards Clients

• Obligation to accept briefs.
• Avoiding withdrawal from service without reasonable cause.
• Upholding the interests of clients.
• Charging fees are based on reasonable considerations, not depending on the success of matters.
• Not suppressing material or evidence.

Duty towards Opponents

• Prohibition of direct negotiation with the opposing party.
• Fulfilling legitimate promises made.

Duty towards Fellow Advocates

• Prohibition of advertising or soliciting work.
• Using a signboard and nameplate of reasonable size and decent appearance.
• Avoiding the promotion of the unauthorised practice of law.
• Only accept a fee of what can be taxed under the rules when the client can pay more.

These rules are implemented to ensure that advocates maintain professional standards, behave ethically and uphold the integrity of the legal profession in India.

The legal profession is a distinguished field that exists for the betterment of society rather than personal gain. It operates as a crucial component of the administration of justice . Unlike a business, the legal profession is dedicated to serving the public good. As a result, ethical conduct entails respecting and adhering to the law and legal authorities. 

The legal profession holds immense nobility, and both practising and aspiring lawyers must uphold their dignity and demonstrate respect for the profession. Lawyers are responsible for preserving the legal profession’s integrity and ensuring its continued usefulness to society. By observing professional ethics, all lawyers can strive for success while upholding the values and principles that define their noble profession.

You might like

Globalisation and Corporate Governance

Challenges to Corporate Governance in India

Doctrine of Pith and Marrow in Patent Law

Leave a reply cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name  *

Email  *

Add Comment  *

Post Comment

Legal Ethics, Professional Responsibility, and the Legal Profession (Foreword and Table of Contents)

West Academic Publishing (Hornbook Series), 2018

U of St. Thomas (Minnesota) Legal Studies Research Paper No. 18-08

Texas A&M University School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 18-18

47 Pages Posted: 12 Jun 2018 Last revised: 14 Aug 2018

Gregory C. Sisk

University of St. Thomas School of Law (Minnesota)

Susan Saab Fortney

Texas A&M University School of Law

Charles Gardner Geyh

Indiana University Maurer School of Law

Neil W. Hamilton

William d. henderson, vincent r. johnson.

Saint Mary's University of San Antonio

Katherine R. Kruse

Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Stephen Pepper

University of Denver College of Law

Melissa Weresh

Drake University - Law School

Date Written: June 8, 2018

As the legal profession undergoes structural changes, longstanding principles of ethics still govern the day-to-day lives of practicing lawyers. This new hornbook on professional responsibility provides both a snapshot of ongoing systemic changes and a thorough examination of the fundamentals of lawyer and judicial ethics. As a multi-dimensional work by scholarly experts in several fields, the hornbook (1) begins with the changing environment in which legal services are provided in the modern economy; (2) continues with a theoretical grounding of legal ethics in moral philosophy; (3) offers empirical evidence and discussion about professional formation and moral development; (4) provides a comprehensive analysis of the law of lawyer ethics; (5) includes a rich discussion of the modern law of legal malpractice, and (6) concludes with exploration of the rules of judicial ethics. The introduction to and table of contents to this new hornbook are included with this posting.

Keywords: legal ethics, professional responsibility, legal profession, judicial ethics, lawyer ethics, legal malpractice, ethics

Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation

Gregory C. Sisk (Contact Author)

University of st. thomas school of law (minnesota) ( email ).

MSL 400, 1000 La Salle Avenue Minneapolis, MN Minnesota 55403-2005 United States 651-962-4892 (Phone)

Texas A&M University School of Law ( email )

1515 Commerce St. Fort Worth, TX Tarrant County 76102 United States 817-212-3902 (Phone)

Indiana University Maurer School of Law ( email )

211 S. Indiana Avenue Bloomington, IN 47405 United States

MSL 400, 1000 La Salle Avenue Minneapolis, MN Minnesota 55403-2005 United States

211 S. Indiana Avenue Bloomington, IN 47405 United States 812-856-1788 (Phone) 812-855-0555 (Fax)

Saint Mary's University of San Antonio ( email )

1 Camino Santa Maria San Antonio, TX 78023 United States 210-431-2131 (Phone)

Mitchell Hamline School of Law ( email )

875 Summit Ave St. Paul, MN 55105-3076 United States

Stephen L. Pepper

University of denver college of law ( email ).

2255 E. Evans Avenue Denver, CO 80208 United States 303-871-6259 (Phone)

Drake University - Law School ( email )

27th & Carpenter Sts. Des Moines, IA 50311 United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics, related ejournals, texas a&m university school of law legal studies research paper series.

Subscribe to this free journal for more curated articles on this topic

University of St. Thomas School of Law (Minnesota) Legal Studies Research Paper Series

Legal education ejournal.

Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic

Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy eJournal

Legal ethics & professional responsibility ejournal, law & society: the legal profession ejournal.

All Areas of Interest

Area of Interest Legal Profession and Ethics

What are a lawyer’s ethical obligations to their clients, courts, and society? How is the legal profession evolving to meet the needs of our ever-changing world? Learn from top experts in courses on professional responsibility, ethics, and practice, including researchers and scholars at the Center for the Legal Profession and more.

From Harvard Law Today

Hls professors, william p. alford.

Jerome A. and Joan L. Cohen Professor of Law

Esme Caramello

Clinical Professor of Law

John C. Coates

John F. Cogan, Jr. Professor of Law and Economics

Susan H. Farbstein

Noah r. feldman.

Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law

Mary Ann Glendon

Learned Hand Professor of Law, Emerita

Annette Gordon-Reed

Carl M. Loeb University Professor

Jon D. Hanson

Alan A. Stone Professor of Law

Alan Jenkins

Professor of Practice

Andrew L. Kaufman

Charles Stebbins Fairchild Professor of Law, Emeritus

Robert H. Mnookin

Samuel Williston Professor of Law, Emeritus

Robert H. Sitkoff

Austin Wakeman Scott Professor of Law

Carol S. Steiker

Henry J. Friendly Professor of Law

Scott A. Westfahl

David b. wilkins.

Lester Kissel Professor of Law

Visiting Professors & Lecturers

Barbara berenson.

Lecturer on Law

Daniel R. Coquillette

Charles Warren Visiting Professor of American Legal History

Kevin Costello

John c. cratsley, mandy defilippo, david a. hoffman.

John H. Watson, Jr. Lecturer on Law

Julie McCormack

Neil mcgaraghan, alexandra mckinney, betsy miller, catherine mondell, shaun ossei-owusu.

George Francis Brownell Visiting Professor of Law

Adam Sandel

Climenko Fellow and Lecturer on Law

Jamie Wacks

Penny white.

Visiting Professor of Law

Child Advocacy Clinic

Government lawyer: semester in washington clinic, government lawyer: united states attorney clinic, harvard legal aid bureau, housing law clinic, international human rights clinic, institute to end mass incarceration clinic, judicial process in trial courts clinic, veterans law and disability benefits clinic, research programs and centers, center on the legal profession, program on biblical law and christian legal studies, systemic justice project, related courses.

Modal Gallery

Gallery block modal gallery.

• Law of torts – Complete Reading Material
• Weekly Competition – Week 4 – September 2019
• Weekly Competition – Week 1 October 2019
• Weekly Competition – Week 2 – October 2019
• Weekly Competition – Week 3 – October 2019
• Weekly Competition – Week 4 – October 2019
• Weekly Competition – Week 5 October 2019
• Weekly Competition – Week 1 – November 2019
• Weekly Competition – Week 2 – November 2019
• Weekly Competition – Week 3 – November 2019
• Weekly Competition – Week 4 – November 2019
• Weekly Competition – Week 1 – December 2019
• Sign in / Join

• Legal Ethics

Professional Ethics In Law

In this blog post, Sreeraj K.V., a student of Government Law College, Ernakulam, Kerala writes about professional ethics in law. This article covers the importance of professional ethics, its impact in the field of law, various duties and responsibilities of legal practitioners and concerned authorities to look into the matter as well as famous judgments regarding the same.

Professional ethics encompasses an ethical code governing the conduct of persons engaged in the practice of law as well as persons engaged in the legal sector.   All members of the legal profession have a paramount duty to the court and towards the administration of justice. This duty prevail over all other duties, especially in the circumstances where there may be a conflict of duties. It is important that legal practitioners conduct themselves with integrity, provide proper assistance to the court, and promote public confidence in the legal system. In carrying out their duties, they are required and expected to deal with other members of the legal profession with courtesy and integrity. [1] Advocates, apart from being professionals, are also officers of the court and play a vital role in the administration of justice.

Accordingly, the set of rules that govern their professional conduct arise out of the duties that they owe to the court, the client, their opponents and other advocates. Rules on the professional standards that an advocate needs to maintain are mentioned in Chapter II, Part VI of the Bar Council of India Rules. These Rules have been provided under section 49(1)(c) of the Advocates Act, 1961.

Rules on an advocate’s duty towards the Court

Act in a dignified manner

An advocate must behave in a dignified manner during the time of his case as well as while acting before the court. He should conduct himself with self-respect. Whenever there is a ground for complaint against a judicial officer, the advocate has a duty to submit his grievance to the concerned authorities.

Respect the Court

The advocate must show his respect towards the Court. He/she has to keep in mind that the dignity and respect towards the judicial officer are essential for the survival of a free community.

No communication in private

The advocate should not communicate with the judicial officer in private regarding any matter pending before the court. The advocate should not influence the decision of a court in any matter through illegal or improper acts such as coercion, bribe, etc.

Refusal to act in an illegal manner towards the opposition

An advocate should not act in an illegal manner towards the opposing counsel or opposite party. He should use his best effort to restrain his client from acting an illegal, improper manner or perform any unfair practice towards the judiciary, opposing counsel or opposing party.

Refusal to represent clients who insist on any unfair means of practice

An advocate shall refuse to represent the client who insists on using unfair or improper means. He shall be dignified in using his language in correspondence and arguments in the court. He shall not scandalously damage the reputation of the parties on false grounds during the pleadings.

Appear in proper dress code

The advocate should be present at all times in the court only in the proper dress code prescribed by the Bar Council of India Rules, and the dress code must be presentable.

Not represent the establishment of which he is a member

An advocate should not appear in the court, for or against any establishment in which he is a member. But this rule does not apply in the case of appointment as an ‘Amicus Curiae’ or without a fee on behalf of the Bar Council.

Not appear in matters with pecuniary interest

The advocate should not act on behalf of any matter in which he has a financial interest. He should not accept a brief from a company in which he is a Director.

Not stand as surety for the clients

The advocate should not stand as a surety for his client, or certify the soundness of a surety that his client requires for the purpose of any legal proceedings.

Advocate’s duties towards his client

• Bound to accept briefs.
• Not withdraw from service.
• Not appear in matters in which he is a witness.
• Full and frank disclosure to the client.
• Uphold interest of the client.
• Not suppress any material of evidence.
• Not disclose any information of his client and himself.
• Not receive any interest in actionable claim.
• Not charge depending on the success of matters..
• Keep proper accounts etc.

Advocate’s duty towards his opponent counsel

Not to negotiate directly with opposing party

The advocate should not in any way directly communicate with the opposing party regarding any matter of the case except through the advocate representing the party.

Carry out legitimate promises made

The advocate should make best of all possible legitimate promises made to his party, even though not reduced to writing under the rules of the Court.

Other duties include

• Not advertise or solicit work.
• Sign board and nameplate must be of reasonable size.
• Not promote an unauthorized practice of law.
• Obtain the consent of the fellow advocates for vakalat in the same case. [2]

Advantages of having codified professional ethics

• Means of social control. It will keep up with the new perspectives brought to the profession according to the social requirements and expectations. The dignity of the profession will be required to be maintained in order to retain the confidence of the public in it.
• Ethical codes prevent interference of government in such matters through its agencies. If a degree of standardization is needed, it will keep Governmental interference outside.
• Ethical codes are important in developing higher standards of conduct. The code also brings about a sense of judgment towards the profession
• The existence of the code will have great educative, corrective and appreciable value for both the lawyers and the common men. [3]

Authority Concerned

State Bar Council and its Disciplinary Committee

Section 35 of the Advocates Act deals with the provisions regarding formulation and functioning of Disciplinary Committee under the State Bar Council. Under this, if any legal practitioner is found guilty of any professional misconduct, after providing an opportunity of being heard may make any of the following orders:

• Dismiss the complaint or where the proceedings were initiated at the instance of the State Bar Council, direct that the proceedings be filed;
• Reprimand the advocate;
• Suspend the advocate for a period as it may deem fit;
• Remove the name of the advocate from the State roll of advocates.

In the case of Nortanmal Chauaisia v. M.R. Murli [4] , the Supreme Court held that the term Misconduct had not been defined under the Advocates Act. But the term envisages a breach of discipline, although it would not be possible to lay down what would lead to misconduct or indiscipline, which is wide enough to include wrongful act or omission, whether done intentionally or unintentionally. It also means improper behaviour, intentional wrongdoing or deliberate violation of a rule of the standard of behaviour.

Professional ethics can also be stated as the duties that have to be followed by an advocate during his profession. These are moral duties and the very basic courtesy which every person in this field should know. An advocate who does not work with sincerity and does not follow the rules of conduct is said to have violated the code of ethics of this profession. The fundamental aim of legal ethics is to maintain honor and dignity of the legal profession to ensure the spirit of friendly co-operation, honorable and fair dealing of the counsel with his clients as well as to secure the responsibilities of the lawyers towards the society.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/joinchat/J_ 0YrBa4IBSHdpuTfQO_sA

[1] Retrieved on: http://www.lsc.sa.gov.au/dsh/ch02s01.php

[2] Retrieved on:  http://www.barcouncilofindia.org/about/professional-standards/rules-on-professional-standards/

[3] Retrieved on: http://www.internationalseminar.org/XIII_AIS/TS%201%20(B)/19.%20Ms.%20Naina%20Jain.pdf

[4] Nortanmal Chauaisia v. M.R. Murli 2004 AIR SCW 2894 retrieved on http://www.internationalseminar.org/XIII_AIS/TS%201%20(B)/19.%20Ms.%20Naina%20Jain.pdf

Students of  Lawsikho courses  regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/lawyerscommunity

Follow us on  Instagram  and subscribe to our  YouTube  channel for more amazing legal content.

RELATED ARTICLES MORE FROM AUTHOR

The image mirage of justice in india, conflict between medical laws and ethics, ethics of government attorneys, leave a reply cancel reply.

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

3-Day Bootcamp (LIVE only) on

How you can use labour law skills to go from HR manager to business leader

Register now

Thank you for registering with us, you made the right choice.

Congratulations! You have successfully registered for the webinar. See you there.

legal ethics

Primary tabs.

Legal ethics broadly refer to the unique responsibilities of lawyers and the legal system given the important role and influence they have in society. Because of their role and their close involvement in the administration of law, lawyers are subject to special standards, regulation, and liability. Most commonly, legal ethics refers to these rules of professional responsibility : the actual responsibilities lawyers must follow by law such as client confidentiality. However, legal ethics can also refer to the discussion on broader moral principles that societies place on lawyers that may not be legally required. 

Professional Responsibility

The law governing the professional responsibility of lawyers, since they are admitted to practice by states, is largely governed by the law of each state. However, all states follow more or less the Model Rules of Professional Conduct created by the ABA , and federal courts and agencies set their own practice rules and apply specific rules like those in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act . While the laws of each state actually govern, the Model Rules and their comments greatly influence the decisions of courts applying professional responsibility laws. The Model Rules set mandatory and discretionary rules and principles on a wide variety of lawyer practice including: client confidentiality , conflicts of interest , fiduciary responsibilities , commingling , and general malpractice . Should a lawyer breach these rules, state courts and enforcement agencies have wide discretion to punish the lawyer and breaching some of the rules like conflicts of interest can impact the outcome of the lawyer’s matters. 

Broader Legal Ethics

Legal ethics can refer to a higher set of norms that lawyers should follow that may not be required by set legal rules. Many of the model rules try to include some of these broader principles. However, the model legal rules tend to be considered a floor of expected requirements of lawyers. Legal ethics can refer to the broader principles lawyers should strive for to ensure the protection and adequate representation of clients. While codes try their best to encourage ethical conduct of lawyers, the legal profession for centuries has struggled with balancing client protections with the often conflicting interests of lawyers and other clients. Thus, legal ethics often involves discussion of the ideals of lawyer conduct, irrespective of the mandates of legal rules.

Further Resources

For more information on the legal ethics rules and debates, see the Model Rules for Professional Conduct , this ABA Guide to State Ethics Resources , this Duke Law Guide to Legal Ethics Requirements , and this Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, & Public Policy Article on the differences between and limitations of legal codes and ethical principles. 

[Last updated in March of 2023 by the Wex Definitions Team ] 

• ACADEMIC TOPICS
• legal education and writing
• legal history
• THE LEGAL PROCESS
• legal practice/ethics
• legal education and practice
• wex articles

• Faculty & Research
• Life at Duke Law
• Faculty & Staff Directory
• Event Calendar

Goodson Law Library

• ABA Required Disclosures
• Follow Duke Law Duke Law on Youtube Duke Law on Twitter Duke Law on Facebook Duke Law on Instagram
• Return to start of menu
• Juris Doctor
• International LLM
• Master of Judicial Studies
• Dual Degrees
• Areas of Focus
• Public Interest & Pro Bono
• Summer Institutes
• PreLaw Fellowship Program
• Admissions Contact
• Academic Advising
• Academic Calendar
• Course Browser
• Degree Requirements
• Clinics and Externships
• Legal Writing
• Wintersession
• Study Abroad
• Registration Portal
• Faculty Profiles
• Scholarship
• Visiting Assistant Professor Program
• Faculty Workshops
• Teaching & Learning
• Student Resources
• Student Organizations
• Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
• Student Events
• Prospective Students
• JD Students
• International LLMs
• Employment Data
• Administration
• A History of Duke Law School
• Durham: The Bull City
• Visiting Duke Law
• Rules & Policies
• News & Events
• Alumni Benefits
• Update Your Address
• Event Refund Policy

210 Science Drive | Durham, NC 27708 | 919-613-7006

Legal Ethics

Download PDF version of guide for print

I. Introduction

Researching issues in professional responsibility is a complex process and requires use of materials beyond judicial decisions and statutes. At the core of issues of legal ethics are the rules governing the conduct of lawyers and judges that are adopted by each jurisdiction. These state rules are based on model rules adopted by the American Bar Association, most recently the Model Rules of Professional Conduct and the Code of Judicial Conduct. In addition, each state bar association has some mechanism for enforcing the rules through disciplinary proceedings and through the issuance of opinion letters on ethical issues submitted to it.

You may need to consult bar association ethics opinions, the Model Rules, and the version of the rules of professional conduct for your particular jurisdiction. Case law research can also be complicated because ethics issues can arise from attorney discipline proceedings and such diverse substantive areas as legal malpractice and criminal appeals. This research guide concentrates on materials other than case law, although a few tips on finding judicial decisions in the area of legal ethics are included.

Back to top

Ii. getting started.

If you need some basic background on professional responsibility or an overview of key issues, start with these texts:

• The Law of Lawyering (4th ed.) by Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr (online in Fastcase & updated to 2017 at KF306 .H333)
• Legal Ethics in a Nutshell (5th ed) by Ronald Rotunda ( online & KF306.Z9 R668 2018)
• Legal Ethics, Professional Responsibility, and the Legal Profession , by Sisk et al (KF306 .S57 2018 & online )
• Acing Professional Responsibility: A Checklist Approach to Professional Responsibility Problems (5th ed.) by Leslie W. Abramson (Reserves KF306 .A735 2024 & online )
• Glannon Guide to Professional Responsibility (4th ed. 2023) by Dru Stevenson ( online )
• Mastering Professional Responsibility (2d ed.) by Grace M. Giesel (KF306 .G547 2015)
• Professional Responsibility: Examples & Explanations (7th ed. 2024) by W. Bradley Wendel ( online )
• Understanding Lawyers' Ethics (6th ed.) by Monroe Freedman (KF306 .F76 2023).

There are numerous treatises on legal ethics and professional responsibility. Generally these materials can be found in the KF306 area of the library collection, but can be searched in the catalog under the subject headings: Legal Ethics -- United States and Attorney and Client -- United States .

To access legal ethics resources electronically, follow these research trails:

• Westlaw : Secondary Sources > By Topic > Ethics & Professional Responsibility
• Lexis+ : Explore > Practice Area > Legal Ethics
• Bloomberg Law : Browse > Practice Centers > Legal Ethics & Professional Responsibility

American Bar Association, Legal Ethics: The Lawyer's Deskbook on Professional Responsibility (KF306 .R68 & online in Westlaw ) is a comprehensive volume by the Center for Professional Responsibility of the ABA that discusses current issues using up-to-date case references, commentary and discussion. It is organized around the Model Rules and includes references to the Restatement (Third) of the Law Governing Lawyers .

ABA/Bloomberg Law Lawyer's Manual on Professional Conduct (online in Bloomberg Law 's Legal Ethics & Professional Responsibility Practice Center) is the electronic equivalent of a former looseleaf service that takes a comprehensive approach to providing materials on legal ethics. It provides text and commentary of the ABA Model Rules and Model Code and ethics rules for all of the states, as well as access to opinions from the ABA and digest summaries of opinions from various states.

Restatement (Third) of the Law Governing Lawyers (KF395.G613 A7 2000 & online), like all Restatements, has been developed over many years by legal experts and states the best practice in the area, with commentary. The Restatement is much broader in scope than the ABA rules and includes many areas of law affecting legal practice such as civil liability, evidence and agency. The Restatement is available electronically on HeinOnline 's American Law Institute Library, Lexis , and Westlaw .

If your issue iinvolves legal malpractice, Ronald Mallen & Jeffrey Smith, the annual edition of Legal Malpractice (KF313 .M342 & online in Westlaw ) is a good overview of the subject.

For criminal lawyers, John Wesley Hall, Jr, Professional Responsibility in Criminal Defense Practice, 4th ed. (KF306 .H25 2023 & online in Westlaw ) will help you spot potential problems.

III. Codes of Professional Responsibility for Lawyers

The American Bar Association has provided leadership in legal ethics through the adoption of professional standards that serve as models of the law governing lawyers since the adoption of the Canons of Professional Ethics in 1908. The latest version of these standards is the Model Rules of Professional Conduct , first adopted in 1983 and amended a number of times since then. The Model Rules of Professional Conduct consist of a Preamble, a statement of their scope, and a list of approximately 60 rules, organized into eight subject areas. Each Rule is followed by a comment explaining the Rule.

The Model Rules replaced the Model Code of Professional Responsibility , which was adopted in 1969. The Model Code of Professional Responsibility is divided into three types of provisions: Canons, Disciplinary Rules, and Ethical Considerations, plus a set of Definitions. The Canons are general statements, defined as "axiomatic norms." The Disciplinary Rules (DR) are considered to be mandatory. Ethical Considerations (EC) contain objectives towards which lawyers should strive.

The text of the current and historical versions of the Model Code and Rules with comments can be found in many places, including most of the resources listed at the end of this guide. A few convenient sources are:

• The American Bar Association's Center for Professional Responsibility maintains a page for the Model Rules of Professional Conduct . Included are the full text of the current Rules, the Model Code and the 1908 Canons of Professional Ethics . Also included are lists detailing state adoption of the Rules and links to state ethics rules and opinions. In addition, it provides commentary, legislative history and a comparison of the Rules to the ALI Restatement (Third) of the Law Governing Lawyers .
• American Bar Association, Model Rules of Professional Conduct (annual) (KF306 .A74816). Includes a Table of Amendments and Correlation Table between the Model Code and Rules and subject index.
• American Bar Association, Annotated Model Rules of Professional Conduct , 10th ed. (Reserve KF305.A26 2023 & online in Westlaw ). Includes comparisons between the Rules and the Code , narrative on the legal background of each rule, discussion of related legal issues, and citations to supporting cases and opinions.
• To access the ABA Model Rules on Lexis , follow the path Practice Area > Legal Ethics > Administrative Materials, Codes, and Regulations to view available sources, including "ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct and Code of Judicial Conduct." On Westlaw , use the path Content Types > Secondary Sources > By Topic > Ethics & Professional Responsibility to find annotated and unannotated versions of the Rules. In Bloomberg Law , visit Practice Centers > Legal Ethics & Professional Responsibility.
• ABA Compendium of Professional Responsibility Rules and Standards (current ed. Reserve KF305.A2 A23). Includes Table of Amendments and a Correlation Table between the Model Code and Rules and a subject index, as well as selected federal procedural rules and a few well-known ABA Ethics Opinions.

The Model Code and Model Rules are not binding, but serve as a model for adoption by states. Their interpretation in case law and ethics opinions also serves as guidance, since the state rules are based on these models. Since 1983 almost all of the states have adopted some form of the ABA Model Rules. The others use a version of the Model Code . California is the only state that never adopted either model and has its own rules of professional responsibility, although its current Rules of Professional Conduct adopted a similar numbering schedule and overlaps in some content. The states can modify the model rules when adopted or at any later time.

Codes or rules of professional conduct for lawyers and judges function much like legislative statutes. However, most are not adopted by the legislature, but instead by state bar associations or the highest court of the jurisdiction. Because these model codes have effect in a state only as they are formally adopted by that state, begin your research by finding your state’s version of the Model Code or Model Rules .

IV. Sources for State and Other Ethics Codes

• American Bar Association Center for Professional Responsibility Other Links of Interest links to state codes, codes of other countries and those of other legal entities.
• Court Rules books . West and/or Lexis publishes separate paperback volumes of court rules for many states which contain the current version of the rules or code of ethics. These books are found at the end of the code for each state (Level 3), and may also be found in the online catalog with a subject heading search for court rules – [state] .
• For state rules on Westlaw ,  Lexis and Bloomberg Law : Ethics rules are included in the databases for a state's statutes and court rules.

V. Interpreting the Rules

A good way to begin interpreting ethics rules is to consult the Annotated Model Rules of Professional Conduct , 10th ed. (KF305 .A26 2023 & online in Westlaw ), which includes comparison between the Model Rules and the Code, a narrative on the legal background of each rule and paragraphs on each rule and sub-rule, describing the legal issues and giving citations to supporting cases and ethics opinions.

Another good source to determine the intent of the rules is the American Bar Association's A Legislative History: the Development of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct 1982-2013 (KF306 .L45 2013). Its stated intent is to "lead researchers to a better understanding of the Model Rules...and to aid all those who interpret or apply the Model Rules." It does that by tracing the evolution of the rules from the inception of the commission that created them to the present iteration, providing information on amendments proposed along the way and the arguments given for and against their adoption.

Some states also offer annotated versions of their ethics rules. Search the online catalog for the subject heading court rules -- [state] to locate available annotated titles.

VI. Ethics Opinions

The ABA and each state’s bar association issue ethics opinions . These opinions are written in response to requests for advice from lawyers who want to know whether a past or contemplated future action violates an ethical code. There are usually both formal and informal opinions. Formal opinions are those the ABA deems relevant to a large number of attorneys and tend to contain more in-depth discussion and guidance, while informal opinions were given in cases where the ABA did not believe there would be as much general interest. These opinions are advisory recommendations to the attorney and are not enforceable. They may be cited in another case as persuasive authority to show how the ABA or the state bar has interpreted the Code or Rules. ABA Formal Opinions began publication in 1924; Informal Opinions began publication in 1961 and continued until 1989. Recent ABA Formal Opinions are available for free on the ABA Center for Professional Responsibility website, but archived opinions are available only to members (or for a fee) at this location. ABA opinions are available to search in full text on Westlaw  (Content Types > Administrative Decisions & Guidance > Ethics & Disciplinary Opinions > ABA Ethics Opinions) and in Lexis (Practice Area > Legal Ethics).

ABA/Bloomberg Law Lawyer's Manual on Professional Conduct is an electronic database (available in Bloomberg Law ) that includes recent legal ethics news stories, the full text of ABA ethics opinions as well as a digest of state ethics opinions, and links to additional ethics resources by state. The site also provides the full text of the ABA's Model Rules of Professional Conduct as well as a link to the ABA's comparison chart between the ABA Model Rules and the adopted rules of each jurisdiction.

In addition to the online services listed above, full texts of ABA ethics opinions appear in a series of print volumes published by the ABA. Informal opinions were published only in summary form prior to 1960.

• Opinions of the Committee on Professional Ethics (KF305.A19 O6 1967) includes Formal Opinions 1-315.
• Informal Ethics Opinions (KF305 .A2 1975) is a two-volume set which includes all known Informal Opinions from 1961-1973.
• Formal and Informal Ethics Opinions (KF305 .A2) continued the prior volumes, compiling both types of opinions into a single publication. The latest title under this series covers to 1998.
• Formal Ethics Opinions (KF305 .A2) compiles more recent formal opinions. Volumes for 1999-2013 and 2013-23 are available in this format.

For the full text of state bar association ethics opinions, state ethics opinions are often published in state bar journals , many of which are available in HeinOnline’s Bar Journals Library . State ethics opinions may be accessed from the state bar or bar association (linked on the ABA's website ) or through Westlaw (Content Types > Administrative Decisions & Guidance > Ethics & Disciplinary Opinions) or Lexis (Practice Area > Legal Ethics > All Legal Ethics Administrative Materials). Bloomberg Law ’s ABA/Bloomberg Law Lawyer’s Manual on Professional Conduct also links to State Ethics Resources on an interactive map. Note that coverage and availability will vary widely by state.

For access to historical opinions, a comprehensive historical compilation was the National Reporter on Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility , which is available in paper (1982-2004) (KF305 .A8 N37), on microfiche in the Microforms Area (1983-2007), and in Lexis (up to 2011).  This  Reporte r contains sections on ethics opinions, including both bar association opinions and some court decisions, for most states and the District of Columbia. Although this is the one set that collected the full text of all this material, it was not always complete and it can be cumbersome to use without a known citation.

VII. Disciplinary Proceedings

Lawyers can, of course, be disciplined for a breach of state ethics rules in the state where they are licensed. Each state has its own disciplinary procedure for violations of its rules, but generally there is an initial, informal process to determine whether the charge or complaint filed requires a full administrative hearing. If a hearing is held, it is before an administrative board, usually created under the authority of the state's highest court. Results of disciplinary proceedings are most often found on the disciplinary body's website and in the state's bar journal , but few states publish detailed "opinions" or orders regarding these hearings.

To search for attorney discipline records and any available opinions from state bars, begin at the ABA Directory of Lawyer Disciplinary Agencies (last updated 2023). Most state bars provide public access to attorney disciplinary records as part of a member directory search.  

Appeals from these hearings are allowed, generally directly to the state’s highest court. Appellate court opinions will likely contain more detailed analysis of the ethics violation than the bar’s notice of disciplinary action.

VIII. Case Law

In determining issues of legal ethics, court opinions from the judicial branch carry more weight than the bar association ethics opinions described above. The context of case law involving legal ethics issues can be diverse, including appeals of disciplinary proceedings, legal malpractice, sanctions under FRCP 11, 26 and 37 and their state counterparts, and criminal appeals where ineffective assistance of counsel is alleged. Fortunately, they are easier to find using standard research tools, such as case law databases in Bloomberg Law , Lexis , Westlaw , or Fastcase . The West Key Number outline topic Attorney and Client will generally contain relevant cases dealing with lawyer ethics; in other online services, a full-text search of case law in a particular jurisdiction will retrieve results about legal ethics.

Another way to find historical cases interpreting the Model Rules and Code is to Shepardize using Shepard's Professional and Judicial Conduct Citations (Ref KF308.A535 S46, updated through 2008). Shepard's will provide citations to court opinions, ethics opinions and law review articles dealing with a provision of the Model Code or Model Rules, beginning in 1980. You cannot Shepardize or KeyCite these materials on Lexis or Westlaw.

IX. Judicial Ethics

Judges are bound by the general rules of professional conduct for all lawyers, but special rules of professional conduct for judges also exist.  The ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct was adopted in 1972 and revised most recently in 2010.  It consists of a Preamble, Terminology section, and 4 Canons with comments.   Prior to this there was the ABA Canons of Judicial Conduct .  The text of the model code is usually included in most sources that have the Model Rules and Code for lawyers. The current Model Code is available online , along with comparisons to prior editions.

The Model Code of Judicial Conduct is also reprinted in the ABA’s annual publication Model Rules of Professional Conduct (KF306 .A74816). An annotated version of the most recent judicial code is also available (KF8779 .A96 2016).

Like the rules for lawyers, each state adopts its own rules for judicial conduct, and most are based on this ABA model. State judicial conduct codes are generally reproduced as part of state court rules publications and databases (see section IV).

rev. 08/2024 jlb/keg

In this section

• Empirical Services
• Proxy Link Builder
• Journal Students
• Alumni Services
• Duke Community
• Members of the Public
• Document Delivery Services
• Scholarship Repository
• Library Administration
• Access Services
• Acquisitions
• Archives & Gifts
• Collection Development
• Research Instruction
• Research Support
• Ask a Librarian
• Named Collections
• Special Collections
• Durham Statement
• Employment Opportunities

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

The Role of Ethics and Morality in Law: Similarities and Differences

2021, Ohio Northern University Law Review

The aim of this paper is to analyze the relationship between the complimentary concepts of ethics, morality, and law. To a certain extent, these related concepts share some common features. Ethics as a discipline is concerned with what is morally good and bad, and right or wrong, while morality deals with standards and rules of good conduct in society, and law, as a cognitive process, regulates social life through the promulgated rules crafted by a legitimate authority. But how are the differences or similarities between these interrelated concepts expressed? First, the main difference between law and morality appears in the mode of expression. Morality is expressed through the conduct of the individual and his relationship with others, whereas the law applies to the external behavior of individuals in their relation to one another as citizens. Morality is in some way an integral part of law, and every legal system, and to that extent is inseparable from it. Second, although ethics and morality are often used interchangeably, the difference between them, as we will examine further, is more than a matter of terminology, as the terms clarify the relationship of individual values to those within the social and legal order. Finally, regarding legal ethics, the importance of this discipline lies in shaping lawyers' behavior and professional conduct that are principles they should conform to as members of both the social and legal communities.

Related Papers

Legal Ethics

Kieran Tranter

Helen Kruuse

The South African legal profession has been subject to harsh criticism in the last few years, leading to what some have called ‘an ethical crisis.’ Although this perception may or may not be warranted, there have been numerous calls for improved ethical legal practices by South African lawyers. This article seeks to contribute to a discussion about the importance of implementing legal ethics education in South African law schools. The authors (a) explore the meaning of ‘ethical legal practice’ by reference to the international literature; (b) examine the way in which legal ethics has so far been presented in the limited South African literature on the topic; (c) argue the need for a more thorough and critical literature on South African lawyers’ ethics, coupled with a commitment to developing a stronger legal ethics culture within the profession and the legal academia; and (d) suggest a possible approach for South African legal ethics education in the future, with reference to recent developments in other countries

William and Mary law review

Lisa Lerman

In this essay, I contend that all clinical teachers should explicitly acknowledge that they are legal ethics and professional responsibility teachers and role models of the “good lawyer” in everything they do. I argue that every in-house clinical teacher should strive to make her clinic a model ethical law office.

Lawyers and the Possibility of Justice

Lynn Mather

Christine Parker

Cornell Law Review

john leubsdorf

67 Fordham Law Review 2377 2396

James E. Moliterno

International Journal of Clinical Legal Education

Leah Wortham

Externships or field placement programs involve students placed away from the law school and supervised by a person who is not employed by the law school. Externships offer many potential rewards for students as well as other stakeholders, including especially community institutions. But there are also risks—risks that the externship will be expected to accomplish too much with too few resources or that the externship program will be held back in the potential for contribution due to inadequate imagination or planning. This article seeks to encourage externship teachers to put aside assumptions that are sometimes made about how externship programs “should be” and consider some alternative approaches to course design and possible goals for externship courses.

SSRN Electronic Journal

Michael Krauss

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Robert Cochran

Hofstra Law Review

Andrew Boon

Julian Webb

Carrie Menkel-Meadow

Russell Pearce

Legal ethics (Oxford, England)

West Virginia Law Review

Barry Sullivan

Kim Economides

Elizabeth Keyes

Richard Moorhead

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

David Thunder

Clinical Law Review

arlene kanter

Robert Kuehn

William Mary Law Review

papers.ssrn.com

The San Diego law review

W. Va. L. Rev.

Ethan S . Burger

Louis Fisher

Bruce Green

Pace law review

Int'l J. Clinical Legal Educ.

SCLS Law Review Vol 4. No 1.

M Jashim Ali Chowdhury

Michael Ariens

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Library electronic resources outage May 29th and 30th

Between 9:00 PM EST on Saturday, May 29th and 9:00 PM EST on Sunday, May 30th users will not be able to access resources through the Law Library’s Catalog, the Law Library’s Database List, the Law Library’s Frequently Used Databases List, or the Law Library’s Research Guides. Users can still access databases that require an individual user account (ex. Westlaw, LexisNexis, and Bloomberg Law), or databases listed on the Main Library’s A-Z Database List.

• Georgetown Law Library

Legal Ethics and Legal Profession Research Guide

• Model Codes
• State Codes
• Ethics Opinions
• Disciplinary Proceedings
• Secondary Sources
• Web Resources
• Current Awareness
• Law Firm Management
• Diversity in the Legal Profession
• Research Institutes

Key to Icons

• Georgetown only
• On Bloomberg
• More Info (hover)
• Preeminent Treatise

Introduction

This guide will give you an overview of the materials available, both print and online, that you will need to conduct your research in legal ethics. This also guide identifies resources available for researching the legal profession, focusing on materials for the management of law offices and corporate legal departments.

Getting Started

• Westlaw: All ABA Ethics Materials
• Lexis: All Legal Ethics Materials
• Bloomberg Law: All Professional Responsibility Materials
• ABA/Bloomberg Law Lawyer's Manual on Professional Conduct

Williams Library Reference

Reference Desk : Atrium, 2nd (Main) Floor (202) 662-9140 Request a Research Consultation  

Update history.

Updated 6/15 (SG) Links 6/16 (AWL) Updated 5/21 (DGD)

• Next: Legal Ethics >>
• © Georgetown University Law Library. These guides may be used for educational purposes, as long as proper credit is given. These guides may not be sold. Any comments, suggestions, or requests to republish or adapt a guide should be submitted using the Research Guides Comments form . Proper credit includes the statement: Written by, or adapted from, Georgetown Law Library (current as of .....).
• Last Updated: Jul 24, 2024 3:45 PM
• URL: https://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/legal_ethics

Education, Ethics, and the Law: Examining the Legal Consequences of Unethical Judgment

• First Online: 01 July 2018

Cite this chapter

• Patrick M. Jenlink 4 &
• Karen Embry Jenlink 4  

2264 Accesses

1 Citations

The authors examine the relationship between ethics, law, and policy with the intent of distinguishing between as well as denoting the intersection of ethics, law, and policy as situated in education. Distinguishing between legal and professional ethics, the nature of legal ethics as practiced in adherence to the law and professional ethics as presented in adherence to professional and/or institutional codes of ethics specific to educational cultures is examined. Ethical awareness and sensitivity as related to ethical behavior is examined in contrast to ethical deceit and ethical self-interest. Ethical misconduct is examined, focusing on ethical drift, ethical missteps, conflict of interest, partisanship, and psychological basis for unethical behavior. Exemplars of ethical misconduct are presented and the legal consequences of unethical behavior in education are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Infusing Ethics and Ethical Decision Making into the Curriculum

Learning, Teaching, and Social Justice: Eleanor Duckworth’s Perspective

As contributing authors to an edited work that reflects a cross-national or diverse global perspective on education and the law, we are sensitive that the discussion set forth in this chapter on education, ethics, and law and the legal consequences of unethical behavior will be viewed differently by educational and legal professionals as well as political/policy professionals from nation states in other regions of the world, and equally sensitive to the different perspectives that define the legal consequences of unethical behavior in educational institution/settings in those nation states. With this in mind, the positions on ethics and legal consequences of unethical behavior that we discuss are based on a belief that other countries or national states, in similar fashion to the United States, have educational institutions and court systems as well as political/policy frameworks that function in cultural contexts. In terms of the legal system in other nation states, it is Recognise that whereas the United States has a judicial branch of its government, other national states have a comparable legal system pursuant to the constitutions and workings of those nation states. That said, we believe the points presented in our discussion have merit for educational, legal, and political/policy professionals in the U.S. and other nation states.

For further discussion of behavioural ethics see Ariely ( 2012 ), Bazerman and Tenbrunsel ( 2011 ), De Cremer ( 2009 ), Green ( 2013 ), Gino ( 2013 ), Heffernan ( 2011 ), Johnson ( 2014 ).

The following is provided to further explain the types of law (see Dzienkowski 2016 ):

Statutory law, e.g., the United States Congress and state laws enacted by legislatures, affect educators. Examples include statutes governing educators’ obligation to report suspected abuse and neglect of children; requirements for educators to address needs of special needs students; federal requirements for researchers to submit applications to Institutional Review Boards (IRB) for review of research including human subjects.

Case law is typically considered in adjudicating cases in the courtroom. For example, a judge may need to interpret the meaning or application of existing law, resolve conflicts between laws, or fill gaps in existing laws. Such rulings by the court become legal precedent or case law.

Regulatory law in education speaks to regulations promulgated by federal and state government agencies . As example such under the United States system of law, federal and state agencies have the authority to establish enforceable regulations. Public agencies must follow strict procedures when they create regulations (e.g., providing public notice and opportunity for public comment about drafts of regulations).

Constitutional law, e.g., the U.S. Constitution and state constitutions, include numerous provisions that pertain to social work practice. Examples concern citizens’ right to privacy and protections against improper search and seizure (which are important in residential treatment programs) and protections against cruel and unusual punishment (which are important in juvenile and adult correctional facilities).

Executive orders are the responsibility of chief executives in federal, state, and local governments (e.g., a president, governor, mayor, or county executive) may issue orders that resemble regulations. This authority is usually based in federal and state statute .

Malfeasance as used in this context of education is the commission of an act that is illegal or wrongful and intentional. Improper and/or illegal acts by a public official in an educational setting such as a school or university are determined as an act of malfeasance when the act violates public official’s duty to follow the law and act on behalf of the public good (see Woods 2013 ).

By moral character we mean a collection of virtues or vices that enable or inhibit the accomplishment of good conduct (see MacIntyre 2007 , for further discussion of moral character).

Bazerman et al. ( 1998 ) proposed the “want/should” distinction to describe intrapersonal conflicts that exist within the human mind.

Legal responsibility of schools:

Under the law, schools have an affirmative duty to identify, locate, and evaluate students who they suspect may have a disability, in order to evaluate them for potential eligibility for special education services (see IDEA 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1412(a) and 334 C.F. R. § 300.111). Schools must maintain a system of notices, outreach efforts, staff training, and referral processes designed to ascertain when there are reasonable grounds to suspect disability and the potential need for special education services. ( http://www.rtinetwork.org/learn/ld/legal-implications-of-response-to-intervention-and-special-education-identification )

The distinction between sexual misconduct and sexual abuse is significant in legal and other terms, however the two terms may be used interchangeably in certain contexts. The prevalence of sexual misconduct in schools is of concern to students, parents, school administrators and the courts (Shakeshaft 2004 , 2013 ). An intentional act of sexual misconduct on the part of a teacher toward a student is considered malfeasance and actionable in courts of law.

Title IX of the United States Education Amendments of 1972 (“Title IX”), Public Law No. 92–318, 86 Stat. 235 (June 23, 1972), codified at 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681–1688 is a Federal civil rights law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in education programs and activities. All public and private elementary and secondary schools, school districts, colleges, and universities receiving and Federal funding must comply with Title IX. Under Title IX, discrimination on the basis of sex can include sexual harassment or sexual violence, such as rape, sexual assault, sexual battery, and sexual coercion. Sexual violence is inclusive of sexual misconduct such as engaging in sexual relations with a minor (see https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/tix_dis.html )

First Amendment, found in the Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition (see https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/first_amendment ).

The Family Educational and Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) (20 U.S.C. § 1232 g; 34 CFR Part 99) is a Federal law that protects the privacy of student education records. The law applies to all schools that receive funds under an applicable program of the U.S. Department of Education. (see https://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/index.html )

On self-deception, Dolovich ( 2002 ) notes: 

This tendency to self-deception may be the single biggest obstacle to integrity. It prevents honest scrutiny of our own motives, requires that certain ideas be permanently excluded from our minds, and prevents us from fitting comfortably, without tension, into ourselves. The practice of self-deception thus precludes the possibility of becoming an integrated whole, a state of being which is the essence of integrity. (p. 1658).

The term university counsel as used herein is treated as synonymous with attorney or lawyer. University counsel holds a law degree from an accredited institution.

Partisan is commonly used to describe people who fit a dictionary definition of a “partisan,” that is, those who are adherents to, or aligned with, a specific “political party, faction, cause, or person”. Legal professionals (lawyers, university counsel) and educational professionals (administrators, researchers) may be partisans in the social-psychology sense (i.e., adhering to a specific political, financial, ideological affiliation) without complying with the partisanship principle (i.e., pursuing that client’s cause as far as the law allows). The distinction is significant because critics of the dominant view reject the partisanship principle but acknowledge that lawyers are partisans in the sense of being aligned with a particular side of a matter. For purposes of this chapter, partisan and partisanship speak to being in a position or relationship subjectively due to positions of power or politics (see Perlman 2015 , p. 1643).

The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act ( FERPA ) (20 U.S.C. § 1232 g; 34 CFR Part 99) is a Federal law that protects the privacy of student education records. The law applies to all schools and educational organisations that receive funds under an applicable program of the U.S. Department of Education.

The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) is a worldwide study by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in member and non-member nations of 15-year-old school pupils’ scholastic performance on mathematics, science, and reading (see https://www.oecd.org/pisa/test/ ). Its influence on countries’ policy of student assessment is the range of ways in which PISA is influencing countries education policy choices. Policy-makers in most participating countries see PISA as an important indicator of system performance; PISA reports can define policy problems and set the agenda for national policy debate; policymakers seem to accept PISA as a valid and reliable instrument for internationally benchmarking system performance and changes over time; most countries – irrespective of whether they performed above, at, or below the average PISA score – have begun policy reforms in response to PISA reports.

Title IX, as discussed previously, sets Federal guidelines for sexual misconduct and provides for appropriate institutional action. A review of this law should be considered in concert with local and state laws pertaining to illicit relations between a teacher and student.

Ariely, D. (2012). The (honest) truth about dishonesty . New York: HarperCollins.

Google Scholar  

Aultman, L. P., Williams-Johnson, M. R., & Schutz, P. A. (2009). Boundary dilemmas in teacher-student relationships: Struggling with “the line”. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25 , 636–646.

Article   Google Scholar  

Balizar, A., & Korthonen, O. (1999). Ethics, morals and international law. EJIL, 10 (2), 279–311.

Ballard, S. (1990, September 17). Ethics, public policy and civic education . Speech delivered at the national public policy education conference, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Banaji, M. R., Bazerman, M. H., & Chugh, D. (2003). How (un)ethical are you? Harvard Business Review, 81 (12), 56–64.

Bazerman, M. H. (2014). The power of noticing: What the best leaders see . New York: Simon & Schuster.

Bazerman, M. H., & Banaji, M. R. (2004). The social psychology of ordinary ethical failures. Social Justice Research, 17 (2), 111–115.

Bazerman, M. H., & Gino, F. (2012). Behavioral ethics: Toward a deeper understanding of moral judgment and dishonesty. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8 , 85–104.

Bazerman, M. H., & Moore, D. A. (2008). Judgment in managerial decision making (7th ed.). New York: Wiley.

Bazerman, M. H., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2011). Blind spots: Why we fail to do what’s right and what to do about it . Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Book   Google Scholar  

Bazerman, M. H., Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Wade-Benzoni, K. (1998). Negotiating with yourself and losing: Making decisions with competing internal preferences. Academy of Management Review, 23 (2), 225–241.

Bledsoe, C. H., Sherin, B., Galinsky, A. G., et al. (2007). Regulating creativity: Research and survival in the IRB iron cage. Northwestern Law Review, 101 (2), 593–642.

Bluhm, W. T., & Heineman, R. A. (2007). Ethics and public policy: Method and cases . Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Bon, S. C. (2012). Examining the crossroads of law, ethics, and education leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 22 , 285–308.

Bon, S. C., & Bigbee, A. (2011). Special education leadership: Integrating professional and personal codes of ethics to serve the best interest of the child. Journal of School Leadership, 21 (3), 324–359.

Bottery, M. (2001). Education: Policy and ethics . New York: Continuum.

Butterfield, K. D., Trevin, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2000). Moral awareness in business organizations: Influences of issue-related and social context factors. Human Relations, 53 (7), 981–1018.

Cerar, M. (2009). Relationship between law and politics. Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, 15 (1), 19–40.

Chugh, D., Bazerman, M. H., & Banaji, M. B. (2005). Bounded ethicality as a psychological barrier to recognizing conflicts of interest. In D. A. Moore, D. M. Cain, G. Lowewenstein, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Conflicts of interest: Challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy (pp. 74–95). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Clark, J. P. (2011). A legislative and judicial analysis of sexual relationships between American secondary students and their teachers . Unpublished dissertation, Kent State University.

DalPont, G. E. (2006). Lawyers’ professional responsibility in Australia and New Zealand (3rd ed.). Pyrmont: Lawbook Co.

De Cremer, D. (2009). Psychological perspectives on ethical behavior and decision making . Charlotte: Information Age Press.

DeVito, D. (2007). The gap between the real and the ideal: The right to education amid fiscal equity legislation in a democratic culture. Ethics and Education, 2 (2), 173–180.

Dolovich, S. (2002). Ethical lawyering and the possibility of integrity. Fordham Law Review, 70 (5), 1629–1687.

Drumwright, M., Prentice, R., & Biasucci, C. (2015). Behavioral ethics and teaching ethical decision making. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 13 (3), 431–458.

Dzienkowski, J. (2016). Professional responsibility, standards, rules and statutes, abridged (selected statutes) . Kansas: West Academic Publishing.

Epley, N., & Dunning, D. (2000). Feeling “holier than thou”: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (6), 861–875.

Gino, F. (2013). Sidetracked . Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

Gino, F., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009). When misconduct goes unnoticed: The acceptability of gradual erosion in others’ unethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45 , 708–719.

Gino, F., & Margolis, J. D. (2011). Bringing ethics into focus: How regulator focus and risk preferences influence (un)ethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115 (2011), 145–156.

Gino, F., Shu, L. L., & Bazerman, M. H. (2010). Nameless + harmless = blameless: When seemingly irrelevant factors influence judgment of (un)ethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111 (2), 102–115.

Green, J. (2013). Moral tribes: Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them . New York: Penguin Press.

Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2006). Ethics and politics: Cases and comments (4th ed.). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

Hayibor, S., & Wasieleski, D. M. (2009). Effects of the use of the availability heuristic on ethical decision-making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 84 , 151–165.

Heffernan, M. (2011). Willful blindness . New York: Walker & Co.

Individuals with Disabilities Improvement Education ACT (IDEA). (2004). Available from http://idea.ed.gov

Johnson, M. (2014). Morality for humans . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Jones, H. W. (1978). Lawyers and justice: The uneasy ethics of partisanship. Villanova Law Review, 23 (5–6), 957–976.

Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16 , 366–395.

Kern, M. C., & Chugh, D. (2009). Bounded ethicality: The perils of loss framing. Psychological Science, 20 (3), 378–384.

Kleinman, C. S. (2006). Ethical drift: When good people do bad things. JONA’s Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation, 8 (3), 72–76.

Levin, C. S. (2016). Legal analysis: How far can schools go in limited student speech online? Retrieved from http://www.splc.org/article/2016/06/legal-analysis-student-speech

Lincoln, S. H., & Homes, E. K. (2007, October). A need to know: An ethical decisions-making model for research administrators . Paper presented at the annual society of research administrators international meeting, Nashville.

Luban, D., Strudler, A., & Wasserman, D. (1992). Moral responsibility in the age of bureaucracy. Michigan Law Review, 90 , 2348–2392.

MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory (3rd ed.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Mendus, S. (2009). Politics and morality . Cambridge: Polity.

Messick, D. M., & Bazerman, M. H. (1996). Ethics for the 21st century: A decision making approach. Sloan Management Review, 37 , 9–22.

Messick, D. M., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (Eds.). (1996). Codes of conduct . New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Moore, C. (2009). Psychological perspectives on corruption. In D. De Cremer (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on ethical behavior and decision making (pp. 35–71). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

Moore, C., & Gino, F. (2013). Ethically adrift: How others pull our moral compass from true North, and how we can fix it. Research in Organizational Behavior, 33 , 53–77.

Moore, D., Tanlu, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (2010). Conflict of interest and the intrusion of bias. Judgment and Decision making, 5 (1), 37–53.

Murphy, L., & Nagel, T. (2002). The myth of ownership: Taxes and justice . New York: Oxford University Press.

Nagorcka, F., Stanton, M., & Wilson, M. (2005). Stranded between partisanship and the truth? A comparative analysis of legal ethics in the adversarial and inquisitorial systems of justice. Melbourne University Law Review, 29 (2), 448–477.

National Institute of Health (NIH). (1998). NIH policy for data and safety monitoring . Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not98-084.html

O’Connor, K. M., deDreu, C. K. W., Schroth, H., Barry, B., Lituchy, T., & Bazerman, M. H. (2002). What we want to do versus what we think we should do. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15 , 403–418.

Office for Human Research Protection (OHRP). (2010). IRB continuing review of research . Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/guidance/guidance-on-continuing-review-2010/index.html

Papandrea, M.-R. (2012). Social media, public school teachers, and the first amendment. North Carolina Law Review, 90 , 1597–1642.

Parker, C. (2010). Forum: Philosophical legal ethics, morals and jurisprudence. Legal Ethics, 13 (2), 165–208.

Pearce, G. R. (1998). Teaching legal ethics seriously: Legal ethics as the most important subject in law school. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 29 (4), 719–739.

Perlman, A. M. (2015). A behavioral theory of ethics. Indiana Law Journal, 9 , 1639–1669.

Pittarello, A., Leib, M., Gordon-Hecker, T., & Shalvi, S. (2015). Justifications shape ethical blind spots. Psychological Science, 26 (6), 794–804.

Regan, M. C. (2003). Ethics, law firms, and legal education. Maine Law Review, 55 (2), 363–372.

Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Moral awareness and ethical predispositions: Investigating the role of individual differences in the recognition of moral issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91 (1), 233–243.

Rhode, D., & Luban, D. (2008). Legal ethics (5th ed.). New York: Foundation Press.

Robbennolt, J. K., & Sternlight, J. R. (2013). Behavioral legal ethics. Arizona State Law Journal, 45 , 1107–1182.

Rotunda, R. D. (2002). Professional responsibility (6th ed.). St. Paul: West.

Russo, C. J. (2012). Reutter’s the law of public education (9th ed.). St. Paul: Foundation Press.

Sezer, O., Gino, F., & Bazerman, M. H. (2015). Ethical blind spots: Explaining unintentional unethical behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6 , 77–81.

Shakeshaft, C. (2004). Educator sexual misconduct: A synthesis of existing literature . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Department of the Under Secretary, Policy and Program Studies Service.

Shakeshaft, C. (2013). Knowing the warning signs of educator sexual misconduct. Phi Delta Kappan, 94 (5), 8–13.

Simpson, M. (2015). Social networking nightmares . Retrieved from www.nea.org/home/38324.htm

Sternberg, R. J. (2012a). Ethical drift. Liberal Education, 98 (3), 58–60.

Sternberg, R. J. (2012b). A model of ethical reasoning. Review of General Psychology, 16 (4), 319–326.

Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (2004). Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Social Justice Research, 17 , 223–236.

Tenbrunsel, A. E., Diekman, K. A., Wade-Benzoni, K. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (2010). The ethical mirage: A temporal explanation as to why we are not as ethical as we think we are. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30 , 153–173.

Thompson, D. F. (1987). Political ethics and public office . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Thompson, D. F. (2013). Political ethics. In H. LaFollette (Ed.), International encyclopedia of ethics . Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5 (2), 207–232.

United States Department of Education. (2013). Closing memorandum for file 11-000491, Steven D. Anderson, special agent in charge. Office of Inspector General, Investigative Services. Washington, DC: Author.

Wagner, P. A. (2012). Legal ethics no paradigm for educational administrators. Journal of Thought, 47 (1), 21–27.

Warren, E. (1962). Special address to the Louis Marshall award dinner of the Jewish theological seminary, Americana hotel . New York. November 11.

Wolff, J. (2011). Ethics and public policy: A philosophical inquiry . New York: Routledge.

Woods, N. L. (2013). Educational malfeasance: A new cause of action for failure in education. Tulsa Law Review, 14 (2), 383–409.

Woolley, A. (2010a). The psychology of good character: The past, present and future of good character regulation in Canada (with Jocelyn Stacey). In K. Tranter et al. (Eds.), Re-affirming legal ethics (p. 165–187). New York: Routledge.

Woolley, A. (2010b). Legal ethics and regulatory legitimacy: Regulating lawyers for personal misconduct. In F. Bartlett et al. (Eds.), Alternative perspectives on legal ethics: Reimagining the profession (pp. 241–268). New York: Routledge.

Woolley, A., & Wendel, W. B. (2010). Legal ethics and moral character. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 23 (4), 1065–1100.

Zarra, E. J., III. (2013). Teacher-student relationships: Crossing into the emotional, physical, and sexual realms . Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Zarra, E. J., III. (2016). Addressing appropriate and inappropriate teacher-student relationships: A secondary education professional development model. CLEARvoz Journal, 3 (2), 15–29.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Secondary Education and Educational Leadership, Stephen F. Austin State University, Nacogdoches, TX, USA

Patrick M. Jenlink & Karen Embry Jenlink

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick M. Jenlink .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Faculty of Business, Law, Education & Arts, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia

Karen Trimmer

School of Education, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia

Roselyn Dixon

Yvonne S. Findlay

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Jenlink, P.M., Jenlink, K.E. (2018). Education, Ethics, and the Law: Examining the Legal Consequences of Unethical Judgment. In: Trimmer, K., Dixon, R., S. Findlay, Y. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Education Law for Schools. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77751-1_6

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77751-1_6

Published : 01 July 2018

Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-319-77750-4

Online ISBN : 978-3-319-77751-1

eBook Packages : Education Education (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

• Call for Papers
• Essay Writing
• Lex Articles
• Internship Experience
• Internship Opportunities
• Career Advice
• Career Opportunities
• Classroom Courses
• Distance Courses
• Online Courses
• International Events

Ethics in Legal Profession

This post has been written by Diksha  Dubey , a second year student from Amity Law School, Amity University, Chattisgarh.

Legal ethics is a term used to describe a code of conduct governing proper professional behavior, which establishes the nature of obligations owed to individuals and to society. In order to maintain a license to practice law, attorneys agree to upload the rules of professional conduct.

Why do we have legal ethics?

Principles of legal ethics, whether written or unwritten, not only regulate the conduct of legal practice but also reflects the basic assumptions, premises and methods of the legal system within which the lawyer operates.

The courts, legislature and state bars all take part in governing the practice of law in each state. The legislature enacts laws that legal professionals must uphold. The courts decide cases by applying facts to the law. They are usually also responsible for appointing members of state bar ethics committees that hear grievances.

States have “integrated bar associations” which all attorneys are required to join. These bar associations promulgate ethical rules that members promise to uphold. Penalties for violations of ethical rules can range from private censure on the low end to disbarment (for an attorney) or even criminal penalties such as heavy fines or jail time, depending on the severity of the violation.

The following are some of the most important ethical rules that one must be aware of while undertaking the practice of law:-

• Attorney- client confidentiality

One of the most important duties a legal professional owes to his client is that of confidentiality. This duty applies to paralegals, legal assistants, lawyers, etc. Under most circumstances, a member of the representation of a client may not reveal any information given to him or her during that course of a legal representation without the consent of the client. This is known as the duty of “confidentiality.” If a legal professional violates the duty of confidentiality, the offender and or the offender’s firm will be subject to discipline.

• The Duty of Loyalty to a client

The lawyers have a strict ethical responsibility to advocate zealously on behalf of their clients. Here zealous representation does not mean a lawyer should strive to “win” a case at all costs if that means harming third parties and adversaries unnecessarily in the process. It means doing everything reasonable to help a client achieve the goals set forth at the outset of the representation. Therefore, a balance must be struck in strategizing between what is achievable within the bounds of the law and what is reasonable in light of the impact on parties involved still, a legal professional has a general duty to strive to protect the interests of a client to whatever extent it is practical under the law.

• Conflicts of Interest

Lawyers must refrain from establishing relationships where a potential conflict of interest will detrimentally affect the quality of the representation. Conflicts of interest may have negative effects on a lawyer’s ability to exercise independent and professional judgment.

• Lawyer Advertising

Advertising by lawyers and law firms has long been frowned upon by the legal establishment. Although a state may establish reasonable regulations to prevent false or misleading advertising, a straight ban on lawyer advertising would be unconstitutional. The ethical rules hold that any type of communication about a lawyer’s services that is false or misleading will subject a lawyer to discipline. It doesn’t matter whether the communication is technically an advertisement, signs, business cards, letters and telephone answering machine messages. It is unethical for an attorney to do anything that would be unethical for the attorney himself or herself to do.

Importance of Legal Ethics

Ethics in any profession are crucial and it is perhaps more pressing in the legal profession where lawyers especially were viewed with suspicion. Thus an enforced code of conduct is vital in ensuring the credibility of the practitioners and legal system as a whole. Often lawyers and other legal practitioners are faced with conflicting interests from the clients they represent, society at large and personal interests. Legal ethics are therefore important in helping the lawyer to navigate the delicate balance of these interests and work to promote the greatest good.  Ethics also serve to safeguard the interests of the client being represented and ensure they receive service without discrimination.

Common Breaches of ethics

Since codes of ethics are determined by various associations and bodies formed for that purpose, the codes are varied from place to place, as are the disciplinary measures were taken. However, there are some common malpractices that apply across the board. These include:-

• Malpractice

This may include forging of documents or fabrication of evidence.

• Misappropriation of client funds

The lawyer should keep the client’s money separately from his own to avoid the mismanagement.

• Neglect and lack of communication

Lawyer’s must keep their client’s informed on matters about their cases and should not ignore or intentionally delay in responding to any queries and concerns raised by the client’s.

• Solicitation

Lawyer’s should not use false or misleading information to attract more client’s.

Due to the influence of formalism on legal ethics, law schools put more focus on legal technical skills and professional success and less focus on morality, legal ethics and justice. Because of liberalism, self-regulating organizations place more emphasis on the needs of the legal profession and lawyers themselves rather than on the needs of those whom they are called on to service.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Subscribe For Latest Updates

Signup for our newsletter and get notified when we publish new articles for free!

Law Simplified

Professional Ethics: Aims And Objective

Professional Ethics

Professional ethics means a code of conduct written or unwritten for regulating the behavior and conduct of a practicing lawyer towards himself, his client, opposite party and their counsel and towards the court. It is a branch of moral science which deals with human character and conduct. 

Thus, the ethics of the legal profession means the body of the rules and practices which determine the professional conduct of the members of the Bar. 

Aims And Objective Of Professional Ethics

The main object of the professional ethics of advocacy is to maintain the dignity of the legal profession. Chief Justice Marshall has observed that the fundamental aim of the legal ethics is to maintain the honor and dignity of the legal profession, to secure a spirit of friendly cooperation between the bar(advocates) and the bench(judges) in the promotion of the standard of justice, to establish better and fair dealings of the counsel with his client, opponent and witnesses, to establish a spirit of brotherhood in the bar itself and to secure that lawyers discharge their responsibilities to the people.

The profession of law does not only need a high depth of knowledge of law and other social sciences but also a sense of social responsibility which requires noble and high conduct by the legal professionals.

The legal profession is one of the most brilliant, learnt and challenging professions.

Need for the Code of Legal Ethics

The legal profession is considered to be one of the oldest as well as the noble profession of this world. The legal profession, unlike other professions which are generally taken up with the sole object of earning money, is a profession of high dignity. Legal professionals have a huge responsibility towards society. This profession also contains a certain set of rules and code of conduct which every lawyer has to follow and abide by.

An advocate has some moral obligations towards his court, client and at the same time towards the society in general. The foremost obligation is that he should never act contrary to the basic principles of morality and should always act honestly. He should not do any act or even advise his client to do any act which would disrespect the entire judiciary in the country. He should conduct himself with utmost dignity and self respect in the court.

The future of the country thus depends on the maintenance of justice and it cannot be maintained unless the conduct and motive of the members of the legal profession are fair and honest. It therefore becomes the duty of the lawyer to use their knowledge in every legitimate way to maintain the dignity of the Bar. 

The members of the Bar should maintain good behavior which should be defined and measured by such ethical standards however high are necessary to keep the administration of justice clean and pure. Such standards are crystallized into a written code of Professional Ethics.

Prior to the commencement of the Advocates Act, 1961 there was no mechanism which would have a check upon the conduct of an advocate. But realizing the need to have a check upon the profession so that the standards that are laid down in this field should not go down and maintained the Parliament on the recommendation of the Law Commission enacted the Advocates Act 1961.

Thus, professional ethics in law is very important to secure a spirit of friendly cooperation between the bar and the bench. If it is allowed to be weakened by those who use this novel profession to fulfill their greed, and also involve themselves in other immoral activities then there will be a time when people will lose faith in the judiciary.

Read About:

The Bar Council Code of Ethics

Related Posts

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Professional Ethics - Notes, Case Laws And Study Material

Legal bites provides comprehensive professional ethics study materials for students and lawyers to deepen their understanding of the subject..

Legal Bites provides comprehensive Professional Ethics study materials for students and lawyers to deepen their understanding of the subject. The series covers important topics and case studies and offers valuable insights for those seeking to improve their knowledge. Legal Bites is committed to providing quality and insightful study materials.

(Topics to be updated Soon)

Module i: advocacy.

• Seven Lamps of Advocacy
• History of Legal Profession on Indian Advocate Act, 1961
• Equipment of a Lawyer
• Rights of Advocates
• Salient Features of Advocates Act, 1961

Module II: Bar Council

• Bar Council of India: Power & Function
• State Bar Council: Power & Function

Module III: Ethics of Legal Profession & Accountancy for Lawyers

• Meaning Nature and Need of Professional Ethics
• Standard of Professional Conduct and Etiquette
• Punishment for Professional or Other Misconduct
• Conduct of Advocates and Disciplinary Proceedings
• Accounting & Law: Nature, Functions & Importance

Module IV: Contempt of Court

• Contempt of Court - History & Significance
• Kinds of Contempt
• Punishment & Remedies

Other Important articles and study material on Professional Ethics

• Suo Moto Cognizance by the Judiciary

Your valuable feedback in the form of comments or any desired inputs is encouraged and always welcome.

Every contribution toward a goal is valuable, regardless of how small it may be.

Admin Legal Bites

Legal Bites Study Materials correspond to what is taught in law schools and what is tested in competitive exams. It pledges to offer a competitive advantage, prepare for tests, and save a lot of money.

Related News

Professional Ethics in Law Practice

Professional ethics form the foundation of the legal profession, guiding lawyers' behaviors and decisions in client representation. Upholding confidentiality and privilege, avoiding conflicts of interest, and maintaining honesty in client communications are vital tenets. Fairness in fee arrangements and continuous learning to stay competent and develop expertise are also vital. Lawyers must navigate the nuances of conflicts of interest, remaining vigilant and objective to prioritize their clients' interests. By adhering to these ethical standards, lawyers can establish trust and credibility with their clients. As we explore these principles further, the intricacies of professional ethics in law practice come into sharper focus.

Table of Contents

Upholding Confidentiality and Privilege

Within the sphere of legal practice, the duty to uphold confidentiality and privilege is a cornerstone of professional ethics, as it enables clients to entrust their lawyers with sensitive information crucial to effective representation. This fundamental principle is indispensable in fostering trust between attorneys and their clients, allowing for the free flow of information necessary to build a robust defense or prosecution. The safeguarding of client secrets is paramount, and lawyers must take all necessary measures to protect the confidentiality of client communications. In today's digital age, this includes implementing robust data encryption protocols to shield electronic communications and sensitive documents. Failure to maintain confidentiality can result in severe consequences, including damage to reputation, loss of client trust, and potential legal liability. By upholding confidentiality and privilege, lawyers can guarantee that their clients' interests are safeguarded, and the integrity of the legal profession is maintained.

Avoiding Conflicts of Interest

In the practice of law, avoiding conflicts of interest is a paramount ethical consideration, as it safeguards that attorneys remain impartial and loyal to their clients' interests. To navigate this complex issue, it is vital to identify potential conflicts that may arise from concurrent or successive representations, as well as to establish effective management strategies for handling multiple clients with competing interests. By doing so, lawyers can maintain the trust and confidence of their clients, while also upholding the integrity of the legal profession.

Identifying Potential Conflicts

Several factors can contribute to the emergence of conflicts of interest, making it vital for legal professionals to proactively identify potential conflicts to avoid compromising their integrity and the trust of their clients. Identifying potential conflicts requires a thorough understanding of conflict triggers, which can arise from various sources, including personal relationships, business dealings, and prior representations. A meticulous risk assessment is key in evaluating the likelihood and potential impact of a conflict.

Legal professionals should conduct a rigorous review of their current and past representations, as well as their personal and professional relationships, to identify potential conflict triggers. This includes evaluating the interests of current and prospective clients, as well as those of third parties involved in the matter. By doing so, legal professionals can identify potential conflicts early on and take necessary steps to avoid or mitigate them. Effective risk assessment enables legal professionals to make informed decisions about whether to accept or decline a representation, ensuring that they maintain their professional integrity and uphold their ethical obligations.

Managing Concurrent Clients

Five concurrent clients, each with their unique set of interests and concerns, can create a complex web of potential conflicts that legal professionals must navigate with utmost care to avoid compromising their integrity and the trust of their clients. Effective management of concurrent clients is imperative to prevent conflicts of interest, which can lead to legal and ethical implications. To navigate these complexities, lawyers must prioritize client priorities, recognizing that each client's interests may not align with those of others. Multiple representations can further exacerbate the situation, making it necessary to establish clear boundaries and protocols for communication, confidentiality, and conflict resolution. A thorough understanding of the ethical rules governing concurrent representations is indispensable to fulfill their fiduciary duties to each client. By adopting a proactive and diligent approach to managing concurrent clients, lawyers can mitigate the risks of conflicts, maintain the trust of their clients, and uphold the highest standards of professional ethics.

Honesty in Client Communications

Through candid and transparent dialogue, lawyers must convey accurate and timely information to their clients, thereby fostering trust and facilitating informed decision-making. This involves setting clear expectations from the outset, outlining the scope of work, and establishing a transparent billing process. By doing so, lawyers can manage client expectations and prevent misunderstandings that may arise from unclear or misleading communication.

| Case Outcome | Clearly explain the outcome and implications | Facilitates clients' understanding of the result and any next steps

Fairness in Fee Arrangements

A well-structured fee arrangement, akin to a carefully crafted blueprint, provides a clear and transparent framework for compensating legal services, thereby guaranteeing that clients are fairly billed for the value they receive. Transparency agreements, which outline the terms and conditions of the fee arrangement, are vital in establishing trust and understanding between lawyers and clients. These agreements should clearly define the billing strategies employed, including the hourly rate, retainer fees, or contingency fees, and the frequency of billing. By doing so, lawyers can demonstrate a commitment to fairness and accountability in their fee arrangements. Additionally, lawyers should regularly review and revise their billing strategies to confirm they remain fair and reasonable, taking into account the complexity of the case, the time spent, and the level of expertise required. Ultimately, a fair and transparent fee arrangement not only benefits clients but also enhances the reputation of the legal profession as a whole.

Maintaining Competence and Expertise

Maintaining competence and expertise is a critical aspect of professional ethics in law, as it guarantees that lawyers provide high-quality services to their clients. To achieve this, lawyers must commit to ongoing learning and professional development, staying abreast of changes in the law and refining their practice skills. By doing so, they can develop legal specialties, enhance their expertise, and stay current with the evolving legal landscape.

Stay Current With Changes

Lawyers must continually update their knowledge and skills to reflect the dynamic nature of the legal landscape, ensuring their expertise remains current and effective in an era of rapid change. This requires staying informed about the latest developments in law, technology, and industry trends. Failing to do so can result in inadequate representation, compromising the interests of clients and the integrity of the legal profession.

To stay current, lawyers should prioritize ongoing learning and professional development. This includes:

Develop Legal Specialties

As the legal landscape continues to evolve, lawyers must cultivate concentrated knowledge and expertise to provide high-caliber services to clients and establish themselves as authorities in their chosen fields. Developing legal specialties is vital for maintaining competence and expertise, enabling lawyers to navigate complex legal issues with precision and confidence. By focusing on niche areas of law, lawyers can demonstrate exceptional proficiency, setting themselves apart from general practitioners. This niche expertise fosters market differentiation, allowing lawyers to attract discerning clients seeking specialized counsel. Additionally, concentrated knowledge enables lawyers to anticipate and respond to emerging trends and challenges, ensuring they remain at the forefront of their field. By developing legal specialties, lawyers can provide tailored solutions, optimize client satisfaction, and enhance their professional reputation. In today's competitive legal market, cultivating specialized knowledge is key for lawyers seeking to establish themselves as trusted authorities and deliver exceptional legal services.

Enhance Practice Skills

Through ongoing training, self-assessment, and adaptation, attorneys can refine their practice skills to stay abreast of the latest legal developments, ensuring their expertise remains current and effective. This commitment to continuous learning is essential in maintaining competence and expertise, allowing lawyers to provide high-quality services to their clients.

To enhance practice skills, attorneys should focus on the following key areas:

• Stay current with legal updates : Engage in regular continuing legal education to stay informed about changes in laws, regulations, and industry trends.
• Develop effective Time Management strategies : Prioritize tasks, manage workload, and optimize workflow to ensure efficient use of time and resources.
• Leverage Technology Integration : Adopt innovative tools and software to streamline processes, enhance client communication, and improve case management.
• Foster critical thinking and analytical skills : Engage in reflective practice, seek feedback, and develop a growth mindset to improve problem-solving and decision-making abilities.

Managing Conflicts of Interest

Managing the complexities of multiple relationships, attorneys must delicately balance competing interests to avoid compromising their professional obligations. In doing so, they must navigate the nuances of conflicts of interest, where personal and professional allegiances can become intertwined. To mitigate these risks, law firms often employ robust screening processes to identify potential conflicts at the outset. These processes involve a thorough review of a client's interests, affiliations, and relationships to verify that they do not align with those of existing or former clients. However, even with these safeguards in place, the specter of blind loyalty can still arise, where an attorney's personal affinity for a client clouds their judgment, leading them to prioritize the client's interests over their professional duties. It is crucial, then, that attorneys remain vigilant and objective, recognizing that their ultimate loyalty lies with the law and their professional obligations, rather than with any particular client or interest group.

Reporting Misconduct by Peers

Attorneys who have successfully navigated the complexities of conflicts of interest must also be prepared to confront the difficult reality of reporting misconduct by their peers. This daunting task requires moral courage, as it often involves reporting colleagues and potentially damaging professional relationships. However, it is essential to uphold the integrity of the legal profession and protect the public from unethical behavior.

When reporting misconduct, attorneys should consider the following key factors:

• Whistleblower protection : Understand the legal safeguards in place to protect those who report misconduct from retaliation or persecution.
• Confidentiality : Be aware of the limits of confidentiality and the circumstances under which reporting misconduct may require disclosure of confidential information .
• Reporting mechanisms : Familiarize yourself with the reporting procedures and channels available, such as internal firm reporting or reporting to regulatory bodies.
• Consequences of inaction : Recognize the potential consequences of failing to report misconduct, including damage to the profession's reputation and harm to clients.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can attorneys accept gifts from clients?.

Accepting gifts from clients raises concerns about undue influence and blurred boundaries. Establishing clear gift policies and setting professional boundaries are vital to maintaining a healthy attorney-client relationship, ensuring objectivity, and avoiding potential conflicts of interest.

Are Attorneys Liable for Client Fraud?

In general, attorneys may be held vicariously liable for client fraud if they knowingly assist or facilitate fraudulent activities, demonstrating fraudulent intent, but mere negligence or unawareness does not typically establish liability.

Can Attorneys Practice Law Across State Lines?

In the modern legal landscape, attorneys face significant barriers to multistate practice, primarily due to varying licensing hurdles, necessitating careful navigation of disparate jurisdictional requirements to facilitate seamless representation of clients across state lines.

How Do Attorneys Handle Client Social Media Requests?

When handling client social media requests, attorneys must establish clear online boundaries to maintain professional integrity, ensuring virtual representation aligns with jurisdictional rules and avoids unauthorized practice, thereby protecting both client confidentiality and their own licenses.

Can Attorneys Date Former Clients?

Outside legal practice, dating former clients raises questions about power dynamics and potential exploitation. In romantic relationships, a prior professional connection can blur boundaries, creating conflict interests and undermining informed consent.

UNLOCK YOUR COPY

Wake Forest Law

Recruiting Policies for Students

Career planning, counseling, and individual professional development are integral components of a legal education, reflecting Wake Forest Law School’s commitment to educating the whole professional. As we strive to position students to be successful in the job search, we also recognize that students need meaningful time and space to pursue academic study. Traditionally our practice has been not to meet with first-year students to discuss career planning until after October 15. We encourage students to develop a relationship with their career advisor through the 1L Professional Development class; if students have specific questions they are welcome to schedule an appointment prior to October 15, but we recommend that students focus on academics in their first semester.

The OCPD is committed to each student’s ethical and professional growth during law school and into future careers. As such, we expect each student to adhere to certain policies and responsibilities that promote ethics and professionalism in the recruiting and job search process. These guidelines are detailed in the Student Professionalism Contract and include:

• Student Responsibility : Students should keep OCPD apprised of employment status each year. Students must provide OCPD with information requested in surveys or otherwise so that OCPD can comply with its reporting obligations to the law school, the ABA, and NALP.
• Professional Conduct : We expect students to act in a professional manner and be courteous and respectful in communication with employers, alumni, networking contacts, classmates, OCPD, and other Wake Forest law personnel.
• Accepting an Offer of Employment : Once a student has committed to a specific employer, we expect that student to follow through on the commitment. Once a student has accepted an offer, the student should withdraw all pending applications and cease seeking employment on entertaining other offers.
• Emergency Cancellation: If an unavoidable and unforeseen emergency prevents a student from attending an interview, the student must notify OCPD immediately by phone and follow up by email.
• Multiple Open Offers : Students should not hold open more than 5 pending offers at any one time.

Policy on Nondiscrimination

Wake Forest University School of Law expects that every student will be treated fairly, professionally, and with courtesy during any on-campus or other interview, and in hiring practices.

Wake Forest University is committed to diversity, inclusion and the spirit of Pro Humanitate.  In adherence with applicable laws and as provided by University policies, the University prohibits discrimination in its employment practices and its educational programs and activities on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, genetic information, disability and veteran status.  This policy must also be adhered to by all persons, companies and organizations recruiting at Wake Forest University School of Law.

If you believe that an interviewer or employer has acted inconsistently with this policy, you should promptly inform the Assistant Dean of the Office of Career & Professional Development.

Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

The Practice of Law

• Law360 Pulse

Business of Law

Law360 authority, deep news & analysis, tax authority, employment authority, insurance authority, real estate authority, bankruptcy authority, healthcare authority.

• Law360 Employment Authority
• Law360 Tax Authority
• Law360 Insurance Authority
• Law360 Real Estate Authority
• Law360 Healthcare Authority
• Law360 Bankruptcy Authority

• Law360 In-Depth
• Law360 Podcasts
• Regional Powerhouses
• Law360's MVPs
• Women in Law Report
• Diversity Snapshot
• Practice Groups of the Year
• Rising Stars
• Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
• Adv. Search & Platform Tools
• About all sections
• Browse all sections
• Class Action
• Competition
• Expert Analysis
• Intellectual Property
• Product Liability
• Track attorneys
• Track judges
• Join the Law360 team
• Search legal jobs
• Learn more about Law360
• Read testimonials
• Contact Law360
• Sign up for our newsletters
• Law360 Company
• About Law360 Authority
• Resource Library

Texas Justices Sign Off On Attorney Ethics Rule Changes

Law360 is on it, so you are, too..

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.

A Law360 subscription includes features such as

• Daily newsletters
• Expert analysis
• Advanced search
• Judge information
• Real-time alerts
• 450K+ searchable archived articles

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Attached Documents

Related sections.

• Legal Industry

Government Agencies

• Texas Legislature
• Texas Supreme Court
• I forgot my password
• I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
• How do I sign up for a newsletter?

Already have access? Click here to login

Get instant access to the one-stop news source for business lawyers, sign up now for free access to this content.

Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)

PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.

Password (at least 8 characters required)

Confirm Password

Show all interests

Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest. You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications. We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy .

Already have access?

• Password: Forgot your password?
• Remember login

Sign up for our Legal Ethics newsletter

You must correct or enter the following before you can sign up:.

Law360 takes your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy .