critical thinking in mobile learning

25 Critical Thinking Apps For Extended Student Learning

Critical thinking is widely misunderstood. Apps that promote it can be hard to find. Here are 25 critical thinking apps to get you started.

What Are The Best Critical Thinking Apps For Extended Student Learning?

by TeachThought Staff

This post may contain affiliate links. You can read more about affiliate policy here.

Critical thinking apps aren’t the sweet spot of mobile app design.

Most of the more popular apps are focused on social media, productivity, or what always seem to be mindless games. The fact that most apps don’t force users to think critically doesn’t mean that it isn’t possible, however. The lack of cognitively demanding apps is more of an indictment of the users than the technology itself.

There are many apps that do promote critical thinking–and often extended critical thinking and learning at that. These aren’t clinical ‘critical thinking building’ programs either, but rather often enjoyable exercises in strategy, tactics, and problem-solving thought. So below, we’ve collected 25 of these critical thinking apps. Most are for grades 8-12, but several are for students as young as kindergarten.

Interactive learning environment as a source of critical thinking skills for college students

1 School of Civil Commercial and Economic Law, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou, China

Lianghui Cai

2 School of Communication Arts, Wuhan Qingchuan University, WuHan, China

Associated Data

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author (Lianghui Cai, [email protected]) on reasonable request.

The cognitive skills underlying critical thinking include analysis, interpretation, evaluation, explanation, inference, and self-regulation. The study aims to consider the possibility and effectiveness of introducing the mobile game Lumosity: Brain Training into the learning process of first-year Philology students studying at Qiqihar University.

The sample included 30 volunteers: 15 girls and 15 boys, whose average age was 18.4 years. Before the experiment start, the respondents took a pre-test based on the Critical Thinking Skills Success methodology, which was developed by the American scientist Starkey. It was stated that intensive one-month training with the use of the Lumosity premium application in the classroom would improve critical thinking skills.

The pre-test results showed that some respondents had had quite good critical thinking skills before the experiment as the average score was 22.13 out of 30 points. The effectiveness was evaluated using the Student’s t-test for paired samples. It is established that there are significant differences between standard and empirical values ( p = 0.012).

Conclusions

The research can be of interest to those who study the issue of integrating an interactive learning environment into university and student programs, as well as those who consider critical thinking as a field of scientific knowledge and seek to develop critical thinking skills. The novelty of the study is the fact that students were allowed to use the app only during classes, but the research hypothesis was confirmed. This indicates that an interactive learning environment can be considered as a tool for developing students’ critical thinking skills in the context of limited screen time.

Introduction

Critical thinking is one of the thinking skills that relates to the cognitive abilities of a person. From a pedagogical perspective, there are two main approaches. The first approach considers critical thinking as a complex combination of knowledge, skills, and predispositions that can be intentionally developed using proper stimuli. According to the second interpretation, critical thinking is a general skill that is more or less impervious to pedagogical impact [ 1 ]. Critical thinking skills are among the priorities in education. They contribute to the state’s global economic competitiveness [ 2 ]. Even before the pandemic outbreak, critical thinking was studied in the context of creating an interactive learning environment as tablets and smartphones had spread so much that teachers began to actively use ICTs for better and individualized learning [ 3 ]. Critical thinking as a mental process is characterized by objectivity, perseverance, and involvement when a person has to face a problem, an opposing opinion, or disagreement. Carefully designed interactive learning settings create favorable conditions for reflection and critical thinking, promote the development of higher education through better student involvement, popularize online learning, and contribute to effective social interaction in the conditions of reduced face-to-face contacts [ 4 ]. The relevance of the research is due to the fact that mobile applications integrated into university programs can improve students’ critical thinking skills and create prerequisites for media literacy formation. The gadget’s screen can provide space and time to improve thinking skills by engaging users in a systematic and sustained critical discourse based on interactive tasks [ 5 ]. Moreover, information technologies enrich the mental experience of recipients and contribute to the development of reflexive skills needed for critical thinking.

Literature review

Critical thinking was analyzed within the framework of studying chemistry and physics using mobile learning tools [ 6 , 7 ]. The benefits of integrating gadgets were noted as both students’ critical thinking skills and academic performance improved. Critical thinking improvement is often classified as the most important goal of formal education as the ability to think critically ensures success while teaching critical thinking skills is sometimes only part of a higher education curriculum [ 8 ]. Blended learning is often used for the development of critical thinking in the student environment. This approach is mainly based on a combination of hand-on classes, classroom discussions, online discussions, interactive simulators, and various assessment forms that involve and instruct students, as well as ensure a productive asynchronous interaction with the teacher [ 9 ]. It is shown that critical thinking, as well as academic performance, can be improved by using educational games such as Role Play Games [ 10 ]. Currently, mobile software is considered progressive in terms of developing critical thinking skills. This is due to the fact that students adapt faster to any learning environment; they get the opportunity to actively participate in the learning process, solve interesting theoretical and practical problems based on critical thinking [ 11 ]. The analysis of pedagogical impact characteristics shows that effective critical thinking development is determined by many factors. First of all, these are personal (student’s learning style and motivation); methodological (methods, pedagogical techniques, duration of classes, feedback) and contextual (classroom atmosphere, incentive system) factors [ 12 ]. It was concluded that gamification should be considered as a valuable pedagogical tool that encourages users to master educational systems and demonstrate a higher engagement rate [ 13 ]. Critical thinking as an individual’s intellectual ability to analyze a problem using raw data and various solution strategies is a skill that can be improved relatively easily by appropriate cognitive stimulation [ 14 ]. Since the Enlightenment, critical thinking was seen as the core of scientific innovation. However, after the Bologna Process, this consensus disappeared as other goals such as efficiency, professional relevance, mobility, result orientation, and competence came to the fore [ 15 ]. The promotion of critical thinking in higher education has been increasingly requested by society. Thus, for example, in 2017, the German authorities decided to introduce critical thinking into university curricula [ 16 ]. Moreover, in order to determine the optimal concept for a particular educational institution, it is necessary to analyze the framework conditions of pedagogical practice; set learning goals to develop thinking; promote critical thinking in university education; create a proper learning atmosphere; implement and adapt a program for critical thinking development, which can also rely on an interactive platform. Critical thinking as a form of reasoning can represent “good thinking” and superior “higher-order” thinking. However, there is a need for a transcultural approach to critical thinking as culturally specific ways of thinking and an assessment system that attaches particular importance to certain forms of reasoning can be obtained only from the synthesis of social imagination and thinking, which are monolingual. For example, a focus on tolerance, common in Western Europe, may not dovetail with the worldview of a student who came from Asia [ 17 ]. In the context of an interactive learning environment, computational and computer skills that have common features with critical thinking are also studied. These include the ability to solve a problem in an innovative way; the ability to exactly determine what should be derived from a problem in order to find an optimal solution; the ability to effectively reflect on the most important elements of the problem and exclude irrelevant factors from the mental canvas [ 18 ]. Mobile learning has been identified as a strategy that can increase students’ thinking skills of the highest order [ 19 ]. However, mobile technology effectiveness is also determined by the learning process, which takes place along with the use of an interactive learning environment [ 3 ]. At the same time, a strong foundation in the form of critical thinking means that students will be able to solve higher-order issues that require analysis, comparison and evaluation earlier and with greater readiness. Moreover, students’ ability to assess information reliability during its teaching rather than after the fact can make academic classes more productive [ 20 ]. Effective knowledge can be constructed by involving recipients in meaningful contexts of social interaction and life experience. Unfortunately, traditional pedagogy has failed to ensure this in order to develop the active role of students in education, improve their thinking skills and cognitive abilities, including critical thinking [ 21 ]. Creativity as a thinking skill is most often compared to critical thinking as it is a higher-order mental skill that includes the ability to rely on lower-order thinking skills, generate innovative ideas, combine parts to create a whole, as well as plan the creation and development of new products in different spheres of life. Meanwhile, critical thinking has many special characteristics as it is a specific process of clear thinking and rational analysis of facts and events [ 22 ].

The critical analysis of the literature reveals a consistent theme: the integration of mobile learning tools in education significantly enhances critical thinking skills. Studies by Astuti et al. [ 6 ] and Cahyana et al. [ 7 ] in the fields of chemistry and physics demonstrate the positive impact of mobile learning tools on both critical thinking and academic performance. This synergy of technology and education is further echoed in the findings of Leal et al. [ 11 ]. The authors note the rapid adaptation and active engagement of students in learning environments augmented by mobile software. This adaptation is not only confined to the absorption of knowledge but extends to the application of critical thinking in solving complex theoretical and practical problems. Similarly, the work of Lorencová et al. [ 12 ] highlights the multifaceted nature of critical thinking development. In this context, the researchers emphasize the importance of personal, methodological, and contextual factors in pedagogical practices. The above studies collectively suggest that the integration of technology in education, especially mobile learning tools, is a critical factor in enhancing critical thinking skills.

Furthermore, the synthesis of the results underscores the transformative role of innovative teaching methods like gamification and blended learning in fostering critical thinking. Borglum [ 9 ] and Rasyid et al. [ 10 ] illustrate how educational games and blended learning approaches, respectively, significantly facilitate the development of critical thinking skills. These methods, which combine traditional and digital pedagogical techniques, engage students more effectively, as well as provide diverse platforms for them to apply critical thinking.

Problem statement

Mobile games are popular leisure activities that can be used to improve mental functions. This suggests that users from all over the world can develop their problem-solving skills while enjoying the game. Numerous mobile games, including adventures, puzzles, car racing, shooters, and sports, can contribute to the cognitive development of a person, preparing them for faster decision-making, stimulating the brain, and rewarding successful task completion [ 18 ]. Critical thinking can be indirectly developed by video games offering veiled exercises in strategy, tactics, and problem-thinking, as seen in games like Plague Inc. or Minecraft. Furthermore, there are interactive mobile applications specifically aimed at developing critical thinking skills, such as Logic Master, Can You Escape, Skillz, Brain games, Brainiton, Unblock me, and others [ 19 ]. The analysis of the existing literature [ 23 – 27 ] shows that the discussion mainly focuses on assessing the overall impact of mobile games on cognitive development, rather than on critical thinking skills. However, the latter is no less important and this study aims to address this gap. Therefore, it explores how an interactive learning environment created with the mobile game Lumosity: Brain Training can develop critical thinking skills in first-year college students.

The research aims to empirically study the effectiveness of digital software introduction to improve critical thinking skills in the student environment. The following tasks have been set: formation of an experimental group to test the hypothesis; selection and execution of optimal software with a focus on age relevance; preliminary assessment of respondents’ critical thinking skills; and comparison of initial skills with those formed after repeated interaction with an application that ensures an interactive learning environment.

Lumosity: Brain Training presents a unique approach to cognitive development. This application focuses on enhancing various cognitive domains, such as memory, attention, flexibility, speed, and problem-solving. Based on neuropsychological tasks, the app provides a range of games that adapt to the user’s performance, ensuring a challenging and personalized experience. It tracks progress over time, offering users valuable feedback on their cognitive abilities and areas for improvement. The gamified nature of Lumosity increases engagement and motivation, which are crucial for consistent use and cognitive improvement.

Methods and materials

The study primarily utilizes the Critical Thinking Skills Success Technique developed by American researcher Starkey [ 28 ]. This method was chosen due to its structure, which consists of a Pretest and a Post-test. The Pretest is designed to determine the initial level of the respondent’s critical thinking skills. It comprises 30 questions, each with four answer options, where only one is correct. Notably, there is no time limit for completing the test, and respondents are awarded 1 point for each correct answer. The Post-test is structured similarly to the Pretest, facilitating a comparison of results after the experimental part of the study. This method is intended for individuals over 16 years of age [ 29 ]. The questions from the test evaluate various aspects of critical thinking (problem solving, decision making, logical reasoning, analysis and evaluation of statements). Tasks range from evaluating arguments and conclusions to identifying logical errors and making evidence-based judgments [ 29 ].

The interactivity of the learning environment was ensured through the use of the Lumosity: BrainTraining mobile application. This software primarily includes games that train memory, speed, flexibility of thinking, and problem-solving skills, which are crucial components of critical thinking. According to the developers, the game is based on cognitive, neuropsychological, and experimental tasks that are transformed into interactive games and puzzles. The study employs the Lumosity Premium subscription, which offers an individualized training program, unlimited access to games, detailed progress information, and recommendations for improving game accuracy, speed, and strategy. The application’s interface is illustrated in Fig. 1 .

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 12909_2024_5247_Fig1_HTML.jpg

Lumosity: brain training interface

It is important to note that the application under study does not specialize in critical thinking per se but provides comprehensive cognitive stimulation. This choice was made due to the limited availability of market options. Apps for critical thinking development on Google Play generally have low interactivity and tend to focus more on disseminating information about critical thinking and its improvement methods, such as Critical Thinking, Critical Thinking Insight, Learn Critical Thinking Offline Guide, and others. On the App Store platform, there is only one app specifically aimed at critical thinking development for elementary schoolchildren, the Critical Thinking Activities game by Ventura Educational Systems.

The research received no support from LumosLabs, as they were not a party involved in the study. The monthly subscription for each member of the experimental group was funded by Qiqihar University. There were no material or non-material benefits involved, and the choice of the premium version was purely for the research purpose of evaluating the effectiveness of a short, intensive use of this type of mobile application.

After one month of training, the experimental group was administered a one-factor Post-test consisting of 30 questions to reflect progress in critical thinking. A dependent samples t-test was used as the statistical method to compare the means from the two related groups.

This research also included a pilot study. The objective of the pilot study was to test the feasibility of the methodologies and the effectiveness of the mobile applications in a smaller, controlled setting before the full-scale implementation. This preliminary phase involved a select group of participants exposed to the same mobile applications and testing procedures as planned for the main study. The pilot study allowed for an initial assessment of the research design, the suitability of the selected mobile applications for enhancing critical thinking, and the adequacy of the testing instruments. It also provided an opportunity to refine the research methodology based on the feedback and observations gathered during this phase. The insights gained from the pilot study were instrumental in making necessary adjustments to ensure the validity and reliability of the main study. The pilot study helped determine the optimal frequency and duration of sessions in Lumosity: Brain Training. Consequently, it was possible to maximize cognitive benefits without causing fatigue or disinterest among participants. As a result, the psychometric tool did not cause misunderstanding on the part of participants.

Participants

The study involved 60 first-year student volunteers studying at the Faculty of Philology of Qiqihar University (the average age of the respondents was 18.4 years) divided into two groups of equal size and composition, experimental and control. The sample was representative in terms of biological gender (15 males and 15 females in both groups).

Considering the number of students in the faculty as a general sample, the allowable sampling error does not exceed p = 4.82, which allows us to state that the sample is representative of the given educational institution and the age of the participants. The choice of first-year students is due to the minimal development of critical thinking skills that are instilled in the course of university education, which allows more accurate judgment of the results of the impact of the application. In addition, the assessed impact is planned to be focused primarily on high school students and first-year students.

Anyone could join the study. After taking the pretest, the experimental group got access to a monthly premium subscription of the Lumosity: Brain Training app and used it exclusively in the classroom. The principle of voluntariness ensured relatively high motivation and academic discipline. The respondents were interested in the topic and at the very beginning gave their written consent not to play the game outside the classroom and not to use other cognitive stimulations aimed at improving critical thinking skills. This refers to applications similar in content, video games, online courses, training sessions, books. They were also given a possibility of leaving the group at any stage without prior approval and sanctions.

Research design

This study involved 60 first-year philology students from Qiqihar University. The participants were randomly assigned to either the control or the experimental group. This randomization process was a crucial step in the research design. It minimized any systematic differences between the groups. By allocating students randomly, the study ensured that each group was comparable in terms of various potential confounding variables, such as prior knowledge, cognitive abilities, and learning styles.

Both classes involved in the study were taught by the same teacher. This arrangement was critical for consistency in the delivery of course content and teaching methodology. With a single educator responsible for both the control and the experimental groups, it was possible to effectively monitor variables related to teaching style, instructor expertise, and interaction dynamics.

In the first stage of the study, the respondents performed the Critical Thinking Skills Success pre-test to assess their critical thinking skills for both the experimental and control groups. Participants in the control group did not receive any intervention, did not work with the described software. Both groups continued to follow the same university curriculum; no differences in the methods or means of teaching, as well as special means of developing critical thinking, other than those described here, were used in both groups. Participants in the experimental group were divided into micro-groups of 10 people. The respondents used the application for 30 min 5 days a week. The teacher was asked to encourage students at the beginning of the lesson and provide feedback to help them summarize what games they played and what results were achieved. A total of 20 classes were conducted. In the third week of the experiment, the respondents were given an opportunity to play in pairs. This created dynamics and revived the process through introducing the element of competition. At the same time, the micro-group leaders did not focus on the competitive strategy reinforcement but rather on introspection and cooperation. The research participants took advantage of the premium subscription and chose the most interesting games; they shared strategies to solve the problem and tracked their LPI, that is the LPIs for speed of thinking, memory, attention, flexibility of thinking, problem solving. After 1 month, the philology students completed a post-test duplicating the one they took before the experiment. This made it possible to assess critical thinking before and after the mobile game introduction.

Data analysis

To study the impact of the applied intervention, a comparison of the results of post-tests and pre-tests of the control and experimental groups was used, as well as a comparison of the results of post-tests for the control and experimental groups. The Student’s t -test method was used with the strength of the effect tested according to Cohen’s d method. The use of the Student’s t-test in the article is due to the focus on comparing the average values of two independent groups. This tool can show if there is a statistically significant difference between them.

To verify that the sample and pre-experimental design met the requirements of parametric research methods, the results of the pre-test in both groups were checked by the Shapiro-Wilk method. Results B = 0.894 for the control group and B = 0.901 for the experimental group, which indicates that the samples were obtained with a distribution as close to normal as possible.

Statistical processing

Statistical data were processed in SPSS Statistics 23. The study relies on the Student’s t-test, which assesses the software impact on the cognitive abilities of young people in the field of critical thinking.

Research limitations

Initially, the Critical Thinking Skills Success methodology was developed within the framework of the course by Starkey (Critical thinking skills Success in 20 min a day) consisting of 20 lessons devoted to certain critical thinking aspects. For example, problem recognition, finding resources, inductive reasoning, and others. Today in the scientific community this test is used without reference to the textbook by Starkey [ 30 ]. However, this can be attributed to limitations. The relatively short duration (1 month) and high frequency of software use (20 classes/4 weeks) might have also affected the results of the study. From the neuropsychology perspective, the brain of first-year students is quite flexible but it takes time to consolidate positive changes. The respondents’ age also limits the possibilities for the legitimate retransmission of experimental trends. For example, the brain of masters functions differently due to age-related changes and higher rigidity, which is a natural ontogenesis part. Although masters, as well as first-year students, can be attributed to the youth. When testing the hypothesis about the possibility of purposeful critical thinking development in the classroom, the use of software was limited by the university. This did not allow the experimental group students to use the application in their free time and additionally develop basic thinking functions and critical thinking skills.

Ethical issues

This study complies with basic ethical standards. For example, the principle of the research benefits was fully implemented. Thus, the participants not only had an opportunity to test their critical thinking skills for free but also could develop these skills by taking advantage of the premium subscription sponsored by Qiqihar University. The fair sample selection principle was also partially implemented as first-year students studying at the Faculty of Philology were enrolled in the study as volunteers willing to join the experiment. However, the sample size was limited. It involved one faculty and considered one year of study. Moreover, 15 young men and 15 young women were included into the group. This means that some students could have been discriminated against because of their biological sex. At the same time, from the very beginning, the respondents knew that they were involved in the study evaluating the effectiveness of mobile applications in the development of critical thinking skills. The principle of respect for the respondent personality and autonomy was ensured at the research design stage as the statutory document contained an option of refusing participation in the experiment at any stage. The group involved only adult volunteers who showed interest in the assessment and development of critical thinking. There was no risk to the physical and mental health of the first-year students. Moreover, prior to the beginning of the empirical experiment, informed consent forms containing data on research participation, research duration, and confidentiality were signed.

The primary data analysis shows that before the start of the study, first-year students were relatively competent in the field of critical thinking. The pre-test mean was 22.13 out of 30 points, and the range was characterized by wide variability. For example, the minimum score was 14 points and the maximum score was 28 points. The primary distribution data are presented in Table 1 .

Primary data analysis in experimental group

	N	Minimum	Maximum	Mean	Standard deviation
Pretest	30	14	28	22.13	4.485
Post-test	30	19	30	24.50	3.288

It must be said that an interactive learning environment contributed to the development of critical thinking in the experimental group as the lower post-test limit was 19 points, and the upper limit was 30. Moreover, the mean increased up to 24.50 points. This means that the app use really stimulated brain activity. However, there were cases when the post-test result was lower. This may be due to a weakening interest in the study, situational factors, fatigue (intensive classes as a limiting parameter), arrogance and the fact that the post-test contains vocabulary from the Starkey methodology, for example, the names of logical errors that were not displayed in the pre-test [ 28 ]. In terms of statistical significance, the results were compared using the Student’s t-test for related samples. The analysis showed that there were significant differences between the standard and empirical values ( p = 0.012) at the acceptable level of p = 0.05. The data are shown in Table 2 .

The results of using the Lumosity: Brain Training impact on students’ critical thinking skills in the experimental group compared with the control group (Student’s t-test)

		Mean	SD	df	t-criterion	p	Cohen’s d
Pre-test	Exp.	22.13	4.485	29	-2.679	0.012	0.88
	Cont.	14.92	3.809	29	2.994	0.891	0.29
Post-test	Exp.	24.50	3.288	29	2.758	0.028*	1.22*
	Cont.	15.12	3.679	29

*comparison of post-test results for the control and experimental groups

As follows from the results of comparing the pre-test and post-test results for the control group, the changes in the level of critical thinking in this group are not statistically significant ( p = 0.891) and the strength of the effect can be ignored (0.29). At the same time, in the experimental group, the apparent increase in mean scores (Table 1 ) from 22.13 to 24.5 is statistically significant ( p = 0.012) and has a noticeable effect size (0.88). Comparison of post-test results for the experimental and control groups is also statistically significant ( p = 0.028) and has an apparent effect size (1.22), indicating a large change and a strong influence of the studied variable on critical thinking in the experimental group.

As p = < 0.05, it can be concluded that there are statistically significant differences in critical thinking levels before and after the premium app subscription use. Moreover, given that the t-criterion value is negative (-2.679), a statistically significant increase in critical thinking after intensive one-month software use can be noted. This indicates the effective impact of the cognitive stimulation on the recipients’ brains. The research hypothesis was confirmed. This allows us to believe that the construction of an interactive environment in the classroom has a positive effect on the development of mental skills, which include critical thinking.

The reported effect sizes provide a profound understanding of the practical implications of the research findings. It is especially relevant in terms of the impact of interactive learning environments on critical thinking skills among first-year students. The large effect size of 0.88 in the experimental group indicates a substantial improvement in critical thinking skills due to the use of the interactive mobile application. Thus, the average performance of students in the experimental group was markedly better compared to the control group. This fact suggests the effectiveness of the intervention.

Furthermore, an even more significant effect size of 1.22 in the comparison of post-test results between the experimental and control groups underscores the efficacy of the intervention. Such a large effect size implies that students using the interactive learning tool significantly improved their critical thinking skills compared to their initial abilities. Moreover, they considerably outperformed their peers in the control group. This finding demonstrates that the interactive learning environment was effective and superior to traditional teaching methods or non-interactive learning environments in enhancing critical thinking skills.

On the other hand, in the control group, there was no significant change in critical thinking levels. The small effect size observed in this group emphasizes the limited development of these skills without interactive intervention. This contrast further validates the value of the interactive tools used in the experimental group.

In essence, the effect sizes from the study provide compelling evidence of the practical effectiveness of interactive learning environments in developing critical thinking skills. The results suggest that within educational settings, interactive mobile applications can substantially enhance critical thinking abilities among students. Thus, the findings offer important implications for educational practices and the potential of technology-enhanced learning in fostering essential cognitive skills.

This indicates the statistical significance of the results. A p-value below 0.05 confirms the hypothesis that the intervention (with an interactive mobile application) developed critical thinking skills. The effect size, quantified as 0.88 and 1.22, is considered large based on Cohen’s d-test, where 0.2 represents a small effect, 0.5 is an average effect, and 0.8 is a large effect. Therefore, the use of interactive mobile applications is reasonable for the development of critical thinking skills among college students. This conclusion has implications for the educational environment. The integration of technological learning tools into curricula can be a way to develop critical thinking skills in different parts of the world. In addition, interactive learning has the potential to significantly affect mental abilities.

The results of the empirical study confirm the earlier conclusions [ 31 – 33 ] that indicate a positive correlation between the use of technology, especially interactive learning environments, and the level of critical thinking skills. The improvement observed in the experimental group compared to the control group highlights the effectiveness of educational technologies in the development of cognitive skills. This finding is consistent with the conclusions of other authors [ 8 , 10 , 34 , 35 ]. Previous studies have also substantiated the positive role of digital tools in learning outcomes. The article, among other things, expands the dialogue on the need to adapt educational methods to the digital landscape [ 36 , 37 ].

The results continue the debate about the longevity and sustainability of cognitive improvements after mobile gaming. Therefore, the study prompts further research into the long-term effects of constant use of brain training applications. This aspect echoes the manuscripts that have studied the dynamics of interactive intervention on cognitive functions [ 33 , 38 , 39 ].

The study also opens up opportunities for future research, including comparative analysis of different demographic groups and educational contexts. Additional studies can ensure the universality of the observed benefits. This approach calls for a more detailed understanding of how different populations interact with and benefit from educational technologies. At the same time, the potential of applications such as Lumosity: Brain Training reveals new prospects for personalized education, as was also discussed earlier [ 6 , 12 , 14 , 40 ].

In this section, it is also necessary to address the aspect of limitations to make the perception of the results more holistic. The study focuses on a specific demographic group from Qiqihar University. This fact limits the possibility of generalization since the results may not be applicable to a wider and more diverse population group. In addition, the gender distribution was not proportional, which may increase the bias of the article. The duration of the study and the intensity of software use are factors that could have also affected the results. The limited sample size of only 30 volunteers may not reflect the broader group of first-year philology students. The design of the study implied the limited use of the application in the classroom. However, there are potential differences in the use of the application in real life. The measurement of critical thinking skills may depend on situational factors, which may also have an impact. These limitations define the range of future research to fully assess the educational potential of mobile applications such as Lumosity: Brain Training for the development of critical thinking skills in college students.

In the course of the theoretical and empirical research, it was found out that mobile applications aimed at the development of brain activities can improve students’ critical thinking skills. The interactive learning environment stimulates brain activity, helps learners develop memory, speed, flexibility of thinking, and problem-solving skills. The research hypothesis has been confirmed: one-month training based on the Lumosity premium subscription has improved the critical thinking skills of first-year students studying at the Faculty of Philology. The sample consisted of 30 volunteers who, prior to the experiment, took the Critical Thinking Skills Success pre-test in order to assess their initial level of critical thinking. Next, they participated in a four-week training course containing 20 classes of 30 min. At this time, the students had an opportunity to play those games that attracted them the most. When choosing a game, the learners could rely on an individual plan available within the monthly subscription or ignore the program instructions. It is important to note that the informed consent assumed that the experimental group would not use the application outside the classroom or try to improve critical thinking skills through online courses, similar applications, books. This was done in order to assess the potential of the app use in the classroom. In the second week, the students were allowed to team up and play together to increase engagement and maintain interest. At the end of the premium subscription, the experimental group took the Critical Thinking Skills Success post-test. It has been empirically proved that the Lumosity premium subscription has contributed to an increase in the students’ critical thinking skills. This indicates that critical thinking can be developed in students directly within the academic program without relying on the extracurricular use of brain training games, in which students may quickly lose interest. Critical thinking will be more effectively developed when it is taught within media literacy, sociology, and psychology disciplines and has a relatively long and purposeful impact on the student’s brain activity. The practical value of the research lies in the fact that brain-training applications can now be integrated into the learning process not only in the classroom but also in the extracurricular aspect. For example, it can be a campus competition allowing students to demonstrate progress in the brain-training game and have fun. The scientific value of the research lies in the fact that an empirical two-stage study was conducted to compare the development of critical thinking before and after cognitive stimulation implemented with the help of the application. This promotes the discussion about the mobile software benefits in higher education and motivates app developers to expand the range of marketing proposals aimed at developing critical thinking in adolescents and young people. The research results can be used to develop mathematics, journalism, sociology, linguistics, and psychology curricula and to form the basis of a media literacy course. This study can be of interest to those who are interested in an interactive learning environment or seek to develop critical thinking skills. The research perspective is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Lumosity: Brain Training app based on various samples consisting of other students but not of volunteers. Moreover, it would be useful to study the program for technical students and compare the effectiveness of one-month and three-month uses of the game.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Author contributions

HS and LC contributed equally to the experimentation. HS and LK wrote and edited the article. HS and LK equally designed and conducted the experiment. HS, LC studied scientific literature about the topic. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Data availability

Declarations.

The authors declare that the work is written with due consideration of ethical standards. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles approved by the Ethics Committee of Qiqihar University (Protocol No. 6 of 13.06.2023). Informed consent was signed by participants.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

DOI: 10.24815/siele.v9i2.23476
Corpus ID: 249305058

Mobile learning application: Infusing critical thinking in the EFL classroom.

Noni Agustina , Ilza Mayuni , +1 author N. M. Ratminingsih
Published in Studies in English language… 23 May 2022
Education, Computer Science

Figures and Tables from this paper

10 Citations

Contribution of mobile devices to students’ critical thinking & problem solving skills in laboratory settings, "promoting students’ critical thinking & problem solving skills via mobile-supported labs", developing thinking reading classrooms: insight from pre-service efl teachers’ lesson plans and classroom instructions, the infusion of critical thinking skills indicators and microlearning principles in the english reading materials for vocational school students: a content analysis, mobile assisted language learning needs assessment in secondary education, the influence of artificial intelligence (ai) and mobile learning on learning outcomes in higher education: did the mediation of self-competence matter, moodle and telegram to develop students’ language performance and knowledge co-construction in technology-enhanced clil, social media as learning tools: a bibliometric study of educational applications, comparison of the speech texts of indonesian president joko widodo and president susilo bambang yudhoyono: study using a corpus linguistic approach, literasi digital untuk pembelajaran bahasa inggris: program pendampingan untuk mgmp bahasa inggris smp, 70 references, developing critical thinking skills in a digital educational environment, the flipped classroom: improving critical thinking for critical reading of efl learners in higher education, student perceptions of a mobile learning application for english oral presentations: the case of eopa, an exploration into the impact of webquest-based classroom on efl learners’ critical thinking and academic writing skills: a mixed-methods study, higher order mlearning : critical thinking in mobile learning, using content-based and task-based teaching in a critical thinking setting to improve efl learners’ writing, integration of critical thinking into curriculum: perspectives of prospective teachers, integrating critical thinking into the classroom: a teacher’s perspective, enhancing critical thinking using team-based learning, scaffolding students’ critical thinking: a process not an end game, related papers.

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

We apologize for the inconvenience...

To ensure we keep this website safe, please can you confirm you are a human by ticking the box below.

If you are unable to complete the above request please contact us using the below link, providing a screenshot of your experience.

https://ioppublishing.org/contacts/

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

We're Hiring!
Help Center

Mobile learning application: Infusing critical thinking in the EFL classroom

Studies in English Language and Education

The emergence of mobile learning applications facilitates the pedagogical approach to developing students’ critical thinking. However, there is a scarcity of investigation on mobile learning applications’ impact on developing critical thinking as the learning outcome. Thus, this study reports the effect of a mobile learning application, ‘English with Noni’, designed to infuse critical thinking instruction in EFL classes on students’ critical thinking level by employing a sequential explanatory mixed-method approach. A quasi-experimental study was conducted to examine the critical thinking level of 65 students of a junior high school in Jakarta, Indonesia, by administering a post-test assessed using a SOLO rubric. Semi-structured interviews to explore students’ responses from using the ‘English with Noni’ application and class observation contributed to the qualitative findings. The quantitative result showed that the critical thinking level of the experimental group using this appli...

Related Papers

Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences

Yusuf Abdul Rohman

This research was motivated by elementary school students’ low critical thinking ability and their familiarity with gadgets. They use gadgets with various Android-based mobile applications that can be easily downloaded. Thus, this research was designed using an experimental method by explaining to the respondents the instructions for using SBL Apps before operating the application. The population was all lower grade elementary school students in Sumedang Regency, West Java, Indonesia. A random sample of 16 third graders of SDN 1 Citimun was selected. The students were given an explanation first, about how to use SBL Apps, and then they operated the application independently. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and questionnaires, and then processed by qualitative and quantitative analysis. The research results showed that 1) students' responses were positive and significant toward SBL Apps, and 2) the use of SBL Apps could significantly improve students' cri...

The Analysis Of Effectiveness Of Mobile Learning Media Usage In Train Students’ Critical Thinking Skills

Yoseb Boari

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menyediakan materi pembelajaran rigid body equilibrium dan rotational dynamics untuk perangkat mobile menggunakan App Inventor yang layak, efisien, dan dapat digunakan serta dapat meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Penelitian ini menggunakan model pengembangan 4-D sebagai metodologi penelitiannya, dengan hanya tahap pengembangan yang termasuk dalam langkah-langkah mendefinisikan, mendesain, mengembangkan, dan menyebarluaskan. Siswa di kelas dijadikan sebagai subjek penelitian. Tes dan nontes (kuesioner) adalah jenis instrumen yang digunakan. Instrumen tes diberikan kepada 30 siswa, dan angket penilaian diberikan kepada ahli (desain pembelajaran, bahasa, media, dan materi), siswa (uji coba terbatas), dan dua orang guru fisika. Media yang dihasilkan dinilai layak oleh ahli (rancangan pembelajaran, bahasa, media, dan materi) dan efektif untuk melatih keterampilan berpikir kritis dengan nilai N-gain 0,49 kategori sedang dan angket efektivitas pendidik dengan persentase 86% sangat kategori efektif. Siswa menilai kepraktisan materi mobile learning memanfaatkan App Inventor sebesar 78,5%, sedangkan guru menilainya sebesar 92%. Kata kunci: media mobile learning, berpikir kritis, siswa, media

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences; Volume 1, Issue 1; Pages 434–438

Prof.Dr. Nadire Cavus

Abstract The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of mobile learning over the critical thinking skills. The volunteer sample in this experimental study consisted of 41 undergraduates enrolled in computer education classes at the Near East University in North Cyprus. The students’ critical thinking disposition was measured by California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory Scale (CCTDI). Also, the usefulness of mobile learning systems (UMLS), a questionnaire adapted by Motiwalla (2007), was used to collect data. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis techniques; arithmetic mean and standard deviation. Overall, students’ attitudes toward the usefulness of a mobile learning system improved significantly at the end of the experimental study. It was found that after the study the students’ creativity improved significantly. Furthermore, researchers found that outdoor experiences influenced students’ attitudes positively. Additionally, results indicate that in this study, working collaboratively and sharing information were built into a group activity. Keywords M-learning; environmental awareness; collaborative learning; critical thinking; mobile technologies; SMS; MMS; Messenger; GPRS; WAP

Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal

Psychology and Education , Rhino Rienz L. Casas , Airis Kim M. Codiñera

Reading mobile applications, more generally known as an "applications," are a category of application software created specifically to run on mobile devices like smartphones and tablets. Critical thinking is the process of actively and successfully conceiving, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and evaluating knowledge as a basis for belief and action. This study assessed the relationship of using reading mobile applications in developing the students' critical thinking skills. A correlational design was used in this study to assess whether two different variables have a relationship. There were 125 grade 10 respondents utilized by the researchers. The research was carried out at Maguikay High School in G.K. Sudlon, Maguikay, Mandaue City, Cebu, Philippines, 6014. Two-page standardized questionnaires were used in this study, which was calculated using the Pearson's correlation coefficient. Every questionnaire fundamentally plays a role in the study to effectively know the correlation of each variable. The finding showed that there is a significant relationship between reading mobile applications and critical thinking skills. Therefore, reading mobile applications can help students gain knowledge, improve their reading skills, and develop their critical thinking skills.

International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM)

heri hidayatullah

This study was aimed at investigating; (1) the pre-service teachers used the MobApps (WhatsApp, U-Dictionary, and Email) to participate in mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) viewed from the critical thinking ability in the teaching of writing skills and; (2) the effectiveness of the Mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) towards pre-service teachers’ writing skills in relation to critical thinking ability. This study was a mixed method using the concurrent embedded strategy. The researchers involve qualitative strategies and quantitative strategies. Both kinds of data are collected simultaneously. This study was conducted in the English language education departments of FPBS IKIP Mataram, Indonesia. 58 pre-service teachers were involved in this study. The qualitative data were attained from pre-service teachers attending the writing classes using observation sheets. Meanwhile, the quantitative data were gained from experimental design through a nonequivalent control-group de...

Journal of Physics: Conference Series

Pupung Purnawarman

Erly Wahyuni

One of the 4C skills required by the students in today’s global community is critical thinking. Critical thinking skill is not a skill that can evolve by itself along with the development of human body. Accordingly, it requires creativity on teachers’ side. The teacher can consider strategies and methods that can enhance students’ thinking ability. One of the strategies used by the teacher in teaching language to enhance learners’ critical thinking is internet-based nature of Google docs, an online application that can enrich learning environment by transferring teaching instruments that are user-centered. The objectives of this study are to identify the learning activities designed by the teacher to develop critical thinking; and describe the activities that expose the skill and to know the students’ responses toward the activities of teaching English with Google docs. This study employed descriptive qualitative method. The subjects consisted of an English teacher and 24 senior hig...

Altina Ramos

Asian Education Studies

Arthur Firipis , Matthew Joordens , Siva Chandrasekaran

Learning using 1:1 mobile devices is a partnership between the user and the curriculum, where learning interventions are strategically integrated to foster critical thinking skills for effective problem solving. The purpose of this research study is to explore the question, How can 1:1 mobile technology be used to develop critical thinking skills and support creativity? The skill of problem solving is evidence of applied critical thinking during targeted learning. The literature review and focus group results, contextualise and aim to demonstrate how learners are using 1:1 mobile devices to develop critical thinking skills to achieve problem solving outcomes. Engineering courses that are using problem orientated design-based learning and are allowing students to use 1:1 mobile devices, need to support students by including targeted learning interventions. Learning interventions using active learning (self-directed learning) principles that are designed to teach critical thinking skills to achieve higher order problem solving outcomes for ‘real world’ solutions. Focus group results are included in this research study to highlight students’ perceptions when using 1:1 mobile devices for learning as evidence of applied critical thinking skills.

IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering

rika rianti

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Journal of Science Learning

Selly Feranie

Kharisma Fenditasari

Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct - MobileHCI '15

Denis Gillet

Economics & Education

Olena Huzar

Dahlia Janan

Mathews Kalyepe

Than Chhorn

Nafiseh Zarei

Arab World English Journal

Samira EL-Asri

Zainab Muhammad

Journal of curriculum and teaching

Physics Communication

Shiva Irfana

Triyo Supriyatno

Science and Social …

Norhamimah Rani

International Journal of Education

International Journal of Advanced Research

Khoironi Fanana Akbar

Academia Letters

Suvarna Lakshmi G

Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura

english learning

Journal of learning and teaching in digital age

Mine Çeliköz

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research

ISSN: 2165-8714

Students’ Learning Independence and Critical Thinking Ability Using Mobile Learning Technology

21st-century learning requires teachers and students to integrate literacy skills, scientific literacy, mathematics, reading, writing, and technology .

https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.4.1815

Pub. date: October 15, 2023
Pages: 1815-1830
549 Downloads
0 Citations
#Learning independence
# critical thinking ability
# mobile learning technology.

21st-century learning requires teachers and students to integrate literacy skills, scientific literacy, mathematics, reading, writing, and technology in the learning process. Students must have initiative, discipline, responsibility, confidence, motivation for independent learning, and the ability to think critically about the problems presented. This study aims to determine students' autonomous knowledge and critical thinking abilities (CTA) using mobile learning technology (MLT). This research is a quantitative study involving 83 students from four junior high schools in the city of Mataram. The data collection for independent learning and students' CTA was carried out by giving tests and non-tests to students. The test conducted was a written test in the form of a description of 10 questions covering indicators of CTA. The non-test was conducted by giving a student learning independence questionnaire with as many as 15 statements, including five indicators of learning independence. This quantitative research data analysis uses the Rash modeling application with the help of Ministep software. The analysis results show that the learning independence of male and female students in the four junior high schools obtained a percentage of 77.38% in the “good” category. Each indicator of learning independence accepts a percentage above 70%, which is in the excellent category. Meanwhile, the CTA of male and female students from the four junior high schools obtained 75.28% in the “good” category. Each indicator of CTA also gets a percentage of more than 70%, meaning that each indicator is in a good category.

Keywords: Learning independence, critical thinking ability, mobile learning technology.

Abidah, A., Hidaayatullaah, H. N., Simamora, R. M., Fehabutar, D., Mutakinati, L., & Suprapto, N. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on Indonesian education and its relation to the philosophy of “Merdeka belajar.” Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education , 1 (1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.46627/sipose.v1i1.9

Ahmadi, M. R. (2018). The use of technology in English language learning: A literature review. International Journal of Research in English Education , 3 (2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.3.2.115

Aldowah, H., Al-Samarraie, H., & Fauzy, W. M. (2019). Educational data mining and learning analytics for 21st century higher education: A review and synthesis. Telematics and Informatics , 37 , 13–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.01.007

Alghamdi, A. K. H., & Al-Ghamdi, N. A. (2021). Elementary teachers’ thoughts about distance education and learning 21st-century skills during the COVID pandemic. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research , 20 (3), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.3.3

Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education , 40 (1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562

Anazifa, R. D., & Djukri. (2017). Project-based learning and problem-based learning: Are they effective to improve student’s thinking skills? Indonesian Science Education Journal / Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia , 6 (2), 346–355. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.11100

Arista, F. S., & Kuswanto, H. (2018). Virtual physics laboratory application based on the Android smartphone to improve learning independence and conceptual understanding. International Journal of Instruction , 11 (1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1111a

Aytaç, T. (2021). The problems faced by teachers in Turkey during the COVID-19 pandemic and their opinions. International Journal of Progressive Education , 17 (1), 404–420. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.329.26

Bahtiar, B., & Ibrahim, I. (2022). The science literacy profile based on students’ creative thinking skill in the time of covid-19 pandemic using blended learning. In B. Kurnia Prahani, N. Fitriyati, Y. Mahatma, Sueb, M. F. Ubaidillah & K. Wahyu (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Madrasah Reform 2021 (ICMR 2021) (pp. 102–110). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220104.016

Bahtiar, B., Ibrahim, I., & Maimun, M. (2022). Profile of student problem solving skills using discovery learning model with cognitive conflict approach. Indonesian Science Education Journal / Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA , 8 (3), 1340–1349. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1657

Bahtiar, Wasis, & Rayahu, Y. S. (2016). A guided inquiry approach-based physics practice model to improve students’critical thinking skill. International Conference on Education (IECO) Proceeding , 1 , 96-108. https://bit.ly/3Qr1Gnf

Bai, S., Hew, K. F., & Huang, B. (2020). Does gamification improve student learning outcome? Evidence from a meta-analysis and synthesis of qualitative data in educational contexts. Educational Research Review , 30 , Article 100322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100322

Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21 st century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research , 1 , Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8

Boholano, H. B. (2017). Smart social networking: 21st century teaching and learning skills. Research in Pedagogy , 7 (1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.17810/2015.45

Bond, M., & Bedenlier, S. (2019). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology: Towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Interactive Media in Education , 2019 (1) , 105-125. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.528

Brockett, R. G., & Hiemstra, R. (2018). Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research, and practice . Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429457319

Bucea-Manea-Țoniş, R., Bucea-Manea-Țoniş, R., Simion, V. E., Ilic, D., Braicu, C., & Manea, N. (2020). Sustainability in higher education: The relationship between work-life balance and XR e-learning facilities. Sustainability , 12 (14), Article 5872. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145872

Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (Digcompedu). European Journal of Education , 54 (3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345

Cakmak, F. (2019). Mobile learning and mobile assisted language learning in focus. Language and Technology , 1 (1), 30–48. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/lantec/issue/42816/517381

Cakrawati, L. M. (2017). Students’perceptions on the use of online learning platforms in efl classroom. Elt Tech: Journal of English Language Teaching and Technology , 1 (1), 22–30. https://bit.ly/3YnRkX1

Castañeda, L., & Selwyn, N. (2018). More than tools? Making sense of the ongoing digitizations of higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 15, Article 22 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0109-y

Chalkiadaki, A. (2018). A systematic literature review of 21st century skills and competencies in primary education. International Journal of Instruction , 11 (3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1131a

Changwong, K., Sukkamart, A., & Sisan, B. (2018). Critical thinking skill development: Analysis of a new learning management model for Thai high schools. Journal of International Studies , 11 (2), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-2/3

Cottrell, S. (2017). Critical thinking skills: Effective analysis, argument and reflection . Bloomsbury Publishing.

Daud, W. A. A. W., Teck, W. K., Ghani, M. T. A., & Ramli, S. (2019). The needs analysis of developing mobile learning application for cybergogical teaching and learning of Arabic language proficiency. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences , 9 (8), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i8/6206

Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems , 49 (1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018

Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision. Topoi , 37 , 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4

Foerster, J. N., Chen, R. Y., Al-Shedivat, M., Whiteson, S., Abbeel, P., & Mordatch, I. (2017). Learning with opponent-learning awareness. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1709.04326

Fuad, N. M., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2017). Improving Junior high schools’ critical thinking skills based on test three different models of learning. International Journal of Instruction , 10 (1), 101–116. https://doi.org/ 10.12973/iji.2017.1017a

Ghanizadeh, A. (2017). The interplay between reflective thinking, critical thinking, self-monitoring, and academic achievement in higher education. Higher Education , 74 , 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0031-y

Gill, T. (2017). Development and implementation of a simulated laboratory information system to enhance student critical thinking skills and laboratory operations. Clinical Laboratory Science , 30 (2), 88-105.

Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology , 50 (5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864

Gunawan, G., Kosim, K., Ibrahim, I., Susilawati, S., & Syukur, A. (2021). The effectiveness of physics learning tools based on discovery model with cognitive conflict approach toward student’s conceptual mastery. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , 1747 , Article 012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012035

Hawkridge, D. (2022). New information technology in education . Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003312826

Howard, P. G. (2018). Twenty-first century learning as a radical re-thinking of education in the service of life. Education Sciences , 8 (4), Article 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040189

Huang, R., Spector, J. M., & Yang, J. (2019). Educational Technology a Primer for the 21st century . Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6643-7

Hussin, H., Jiea, P. Y., Rosly, R. N. R., & Omar, S. R. (2019). Integrated 21st century science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) education through robotics project-based learning. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews , 7 (2), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7222

Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society , 21 (3), 48–59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26458506

Kabanova, E. E., & Vetrova, E. A. (2019). The use of modern electronic gadgets in the educational process of the university. European Journal of Contemporary Education , 8 (3), 524–533. https://bit.ly/48h8hqT

Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: The relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education , 14 , Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4

Leibo, J. Z., Zambaldi, V., Lanctot, M., Marecki, J., & Graepel, T. (2017). Multi-agent reinforcement learning in sequential social dilemmas . ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1702.03037

Luckin, R., & Cukurova, M. (2019). Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences-driven approach. British Journal of Educational Technology , 50 (6), 2824–2838. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12861

Maimun, M., & Bahtiar, B. (2022). the effect of search, solve, create, and share (sscs) learning models assisted multimedia interactive to improve creative thinking ability and student learning outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA , 8 (4), 1834–1840. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1983

Mangal, S. K., & Mangal, U. (2019). Essentials of educational technology . PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.

Marshel, J., & Ratnawulan. (2020). Analysis of students worksheet (lkpd) integrated science with the theme of the motion in life using integrated connected type 21st century learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , 1481 , Article 012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1481/1/012046

Mazenod, A., Francis, B., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Taylor, B., Tereshchenko, A., & Pepper, D. (2019). Nurturing learning or encouraging dependency? Teacher constructions of students in lower attainment groups in English secondary schools. Cambridge Journal of Education , 49 (1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2018.1441372

Mistiani, W., Istiyono, E., & Syamsudin, A. (2022). construction of the character assessment instrument for 21st century students in high schools. European Journal of Educational Research , 11 (2), 935–947. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.935

Muali, C., Islam, S., Bali, M. E. I., Baharun, H., Mundiri, A., Jasri, M., & Fauzi, A. (2018). free online learning based on rich internet applications; the experimentation of critical thinking about student learning style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , 1114 , Article 012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012024

Mulenga, E. M., & Marbán, J. M. (2020). Is COVID-19 the gateway for digital learning in mathematics education? Contemporary Educational Technology , 12 (2), Article ep269. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/7949

Mutiani, M., & Faisal, M. (2019). Urgency of the 21st century skills and social capital in social studies. The Innovation of Social Studies Journal , 1 (1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.20527/iis.v1i1.1256

Mutiani, M., Supriatna, N., Abbas, E. W., Rini, T. P. W., & Subiyakto, B. (2021). Technological, pedagogical, content knowledge (TPACK): A discursions in learning innovation on social studies. The Innovation of Social Studies Journal , 2 (2), 135–142. https://bit.ly/4627aZR

Muyasaroh, Ladamay, O. M. M A., Mahfud, C., Mustakim, & Sejati, Y. G. (2020). The utilization of gadget in maintaining prophetical values in millennial generation. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation , 24 (04), 5602-5615. https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I4/PR201655

Noboru, T., Amalia, E., Hernandez, P. M. R., Nurbaiti, L., Affarah, W. S., Nonaka, D., Takeuchi, R., Kadriyan, H., & Kobayashi, J. (2021). School-based education to prevent bullying in high schools in Indonesia. Pediatrics International , 63 (4), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.14475

Novansa, H., & Ali, H. (2017). Purchase decision model: Analysis of brand image, brand awareness and price (Case study SMECO Indonesia SME products). Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences , 2 (8), 621–632.

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2005). A guide for educators to critical thinking competency standards: Standards, principles, performance indicators, and outcomes with a critical thinking master rubric . Foundation for Critical Thinking. https://bit.ly/453YqTj

Perdana, R., Yani, R., Jumadi, J., & Rosana, D. (2019). Assessing students’ digital literacy skill in senior high school Yogyakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia , 8 (2), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v8i2.17168

Pratama, G. S., & Retnawati, H. (2018). Urgency of higher order thinking skills (HOTS) content analysis in mathematics textbook. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , 1097 , Article 012147. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012147

Rahmatullah, A. S., Mulyasa, E., Syahrani, Pongpalilu, F., & Putri, R. E. (2022). Digital era 4.0: The contribution to education and student psychology. Linguistics and Culture Review , 6 (S3), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v6nS3.2064

Retnawati, H., Djidu, H., Kartianom, Apino, E., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Teachers’ knowledge about higher-order thinking skills and its learning strategy. Problems of Education in the 21st Century , 76 (2), 215-230. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/18.76.215

Sarmi, R. S., Ratnawulan, & Gusnedi. (2019). Learning media analysis in the development of integrated science teacher book with theme the energy in the life using type integrated of 21st century learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , 1185 , Article 012080. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012080

Schlenz, M. A., Schmidt, A., Wöstmann, B., Krämer, N., & Schulz-Weidner, N. (2020). Students’ and lecturers’ perspective on the implementation of online learning in dental education due to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): A cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education , 20 , Article 354. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02266-3

Silber-Varod, V., Eshet-Alkalai, Y., & Geri, N. (2019). Tracing research trends of 21st-century learning skills. British Journal of Educational Technology , 50 (6), 3099–3118. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12753

Slavin, R. E. (2019). Educational psychology: Theory and practice . Pearson Education.

Sumardi, L., Rohman, A., & Wahyudiati, D. (2020). Does the teaching and learning process in primary schools correspond to the characteristics of the 21st century learning?. International Journal of Instruction , 13 (3), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13325a

Surahman, E., & Alfindasari, D. (2017). Developing adaptive mobile learning with the principle of coherence Mayer on biology subjects of high school to support the open and distance education. In B. B. Wiyono, L. K. Hui, Y. Isao, Hardika & I. Khan, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Education and Training (ICET 2017) (pp. 184-190). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icet-17.2017.31

Surya, E., Putri, F. A., & Mukhtar, M. (2017). Improving mathematical problem-solving ability and self-confidence of high school students through contextual learning model. Journal on Mathematics Education , 8 (1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.8.1.3324.85-94

Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review , 31 , 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5

Tan, L. S., Koh, E., Lee, S. S., Ponnusamy, L. D., & Tan, K. C. K. (2017). The complexities in fostering critical thinking through school-based curriculum innovation: Research evidence from Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education , 37 (4), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2017.1389694

Tan, O.-S. (2021). Problem-based learning innovation: Using problems to power learning in the 21st century . Gale Cengage Learning.

Tanujaya, B., Mumu, J., & Margono, G. (2017). The relationship between higher order thinking skills and academic performance of student in mathematics instruction. International Education Studies , 10 (11), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n11p78

Van Leeuwen, A., & Janssen, J. (2019). A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning in primary and secondary education. Educational Research Review , 27 , 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.001

Vitoria, L., Mislinawati, M., & Nurmasyitah, N. (2018). Students’ perceptions on the implementation of e-learning: Helpful or unhelpful? Journal of Physics: Conference Series , 1088 , Article 012058. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012058

Wenyuan, G. (2017). Using smart phone to facilitate vocabulary mobile learning and teaching in Chinese college. International Journal of Arts and Commerce , 6 (4), 36–41. https://bit.ly/44EcHoE

Widana, I. W., Parwata, I. M. Y., Parmithi, N. N., Jayantika, I. G. A. T., Sukendra, K., & Sumandya, I. W. (2018). Higher order thinking skills assessment towards critical thinking on mathematics lesson. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities , 2 (1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v2n1.74

Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: Digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learning, Media and Technology , 45 (2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641

Xian, Y., Schiele, B., & Akata, Z. (2017). Zero-shot learning-the good, the bad and the ugly. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 4582–4591). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.328

Yurdagül, C., & Öz, S. (2018). Attitude towards mobile learning in English language education. Education Sciences , 8 (3), Article 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030142

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education , 16 , Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

The Language Teaching Methods Scale: Reliability and Validity Studies

Exploring the nexus of digital leadership and digital literacy on higher education performance: the role of digital innovation, how to cite this article, modal title.

Subscribe to receive email alerts for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

ICT and Critical Thinking

First Online: 04 September 2024

Cite this chapter

K. Venkat Reddy 3 &
G. Suvarna Lakshmi 4

As discussed in the previous chapters, going digital and virtual has become the norm of learning in the twenty-first century, learning critical thinking being no exception. Though a couple of studies on teaching critical thinking using virtual/digital/online tools were presented, this chapter focuses only on the use of different virtual tools or teaching techniques to develop critical thinking. The first article in this chapter is on fostering critical thinking dispositions (different from CT skills; i.e.; willingness to think critically) by technology teachers. The authors proposed a framework to develop thinking that identified 6 critical thinking skills and 7 CT dispositions through questions and discussions: assessment, environment, and questioning. It is also to be remembered that the major strategies used to complete the tasks are eight strategies in number. The second article in this chapter is on digital storytelling to help Egyptian learners produce their own digital stories thereby engaging the learners in authentic learning tasks that develop creativity and critical thinking. Digital story telling has succeeded in increasing the creativity in the students organizing and expressing ideas. If technology’s potential is used appropriately, students’ imagination will be captured to make meaningful stories. The study also insists on the role of teachers and their knowledge in creating more engaging and encouraging opportunities to learn and build their learning communities. The third article is on how effective digital story telling is in meaningfully engaging students in the deep learning process learning process. Digital storytelling, a multimedia production for educational purpose, is proved to be a powerful tool to create exciting learning environments as a result of integrating instruction and learning which was similar to what is indicated in the previous article. The fourth article is on good practices of online communication and interaction with the help of learning strategies, particularly in the context of distance learning where the roles of teachers and learners have been transformed where they are physically away from each other. It is concluded that the teachers should create that virtual environment for the learners to freely interact with the teachers and with the peers to discuss the course content. The fifth article is on transforming learning to smart learning environment with a specific case study on Intel education initiatives. The initiative started with training teachers to integrate technology into the regular lessons that help improve problem solving, critical thinking and collaborative learning skills. This study presented the effective ways of integrating technology into classrooms and says that this paradigm shift that resulted in engaging learners in smart learning. The sixth article of this chapter and, also the book, is a study on how google groups help in leverage effective collaborative learning. The study suggests that networking among students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts . The California Academic Press.

Google Scholar

Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical thinking dispositions: Their nature and assessability. Informal Logic, 18 (1996), 165–182.

Burghardt, M. D., & Hacker, M. (2004). Informed design: A contemporary approach to design pedagogy. Technology Teacher, 64 (1), 6–8.

Jones, A., Buntting, C., & de Vries, M. J. (2011). The developing field of technology education: A review to look forward. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23 , 191–212.

Article Google Scholar

Mawson, B. (2003). Beyond ‘the design process’: An alternative pedagogy for technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13 (2), 117–128.

Lawson, B., & Dorst, K. (2009). Design expertise . Elsevier Ltd..

Dorst, K. (2006). Design problems and design paradoxes. Design Issues, 22 (3), 4–17.

Jonassen, D. H. (2010). How does problem solving vary? In Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments (pp. 1–24). Routledge.

Chapter Google Scholar

DBE. (2011). Curriculum and assessment policy statement grades 7–9 technology . Republic of South Africa.

Halpern, D. F. (1999). Teaching for critical thinking: Helping college students develop the skills and dispositions of a critical thinker. Journal Directions for Teaching and Learning, 80 , 69–74.

Nieto, A. M., & Saiz, C. (2011). Skills and dispositions of critical thinking: Are they sufficient? Anales De Psicología, 27 (1), 202–209.

Yang, Y. T. C., & Chou, H. A. (2008). Beyond critical thinking skills: Investigating the relationship between critical thinking skills and dispositions through different online instructional strategies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39 (4), 666–684.

Fahim, M., & Ghamari, M. R. (2011). Critical thinking in education: Globally developed and locally applied. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1 (11), 1632–1638.

International Technology and Engineering Educators Association. (2020). Standards for technological and engineering literacy: The role of technology and engineering in STEM education . https://www.iteea.org/STEL.aspx

Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (5th ed.). Psychology Press.

Schooner, P., Nordlöf, C., Klasander, C., & Hallström, J. (2017). Design, system, value: The role of problem-solving and critical thinking capabilities in technology education, as perceived by teachers. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 22 (3), 1–16.

Zabit, M. N. (2010). Problem-based learning on students critical thinking skills in teaching business education in Malaysia: A literature review. American Journal of Business Education (AJBE), 3 (6), 19–32.

Mandernach, B. J. (2006). Thinking critically about critical thinking: Integrating online tools to promote critical thinking. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 1 (1), 41–50.

Facione, P. A. (2000). The disposition toward critical thinking: Its character, measurement, and relationship to critical thinking skill. Informal Logic, 20 (1), 61–84.

Jacobsen, M. (2001). Building different bridges: Technology integration, engaged student learning, and new approaches to professional development. In P aper presented at AERA 2001: What we know and how we know it, the 82nd annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association , April 10–14.

Dexter, S., Anderson, R., & Becker, H. (1999). Teachers’ views of computers as catalysts for changes in their teaching practice. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31 (3), 221–239.

Trilling, B., & Hood, P. (1999). Learning, technology, and education reform in the knowledge age or “We’re wired, webbed, and windowed, now what?”. Educational Technology, 39 (3), 5–18.

Griest, G. (1996). Computer education as an obstacle to integration and internet working. Learning and Leading with Technology, 24 (8), 59–63.

Hoffman, B. (1997). Integrating technology into school. Education Digest, 62 (5), 51–55.

Mergendollar, J. (1997). Technology and learning: The research. Education Digest, 62 (8), 12–15.

Richards, T. (1998). Infusing technology and literacy into the undergraduate teacher education curriculum through the use of electronic portfolios. T.H.E. Journal, 25 (9), 46–50.

Jonassen, D. H., & Carr, C. (2000). Mindtools: Affording multiple knowledge representations in learning. In S. P. Lajoie (Ed.), Computers as cognitive tools, Vol. 2: No more walls (pp. 165–196). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Wheatley, G. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning. Science Education, 75 (1), 9–21.

Lim, P., & Tay, Y. (2003). Information and communication technologies (ICT) in an elementary school: Students’ engagement in higher-order thinking. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12 (4), 425–451.

Robin, B., & Pierson, M. (2005). A multilevel approach to using digital storytelling in the classroom . Digital storytelling workshop, SITE 2005, University of Houston. http://www.coe.uh.edu/digital-storytelling/course/SITE2005 . Retrieved 12 February 2007.

Robin, B. (2005). Educational uses of digital storytelling. Main directory for the educational uses of digital storytelling . Instructional technology Program. University of Huston. http://www.coe.uh.edu/digital-storytelling/default.htm . Retrieved 12 February 2007.

Gils, F. (2005, February 17–18). Potential applications of digital storytelling in education. In 3rd Twente student conference on IT, University of Twente, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science , Enschede.

Schiro, M. (2004). Oral storytelling and teaching mathematics . SAGE Publications.

Pritchard, A. (2004). Introducing new students to ICT: Giving a purpose to it all. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5 (3), 248–262.

The Digital Storytelling Association: The center for digital storytelling. (2011).

Smeda, N., Dakich, E., & Sharda, N. (2012). Digital storytelling with web 2.0 tools for collaborative learning. Collaborative Learning , 145–163. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0300-4.ch008

Holmberg, B. (1995). Theory and practice of distance education . Routledge.

Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18 (1), 143–150.

Huss, J. A., Sela, O., & Eastep, S. (2015). A case study of online instructors and their quest for greater interactivity in their courses: Overcoming the distance in distance education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40 (4), 72–86.

Santoveña, S. M. (2011). Communication processes in virtual learning environments and their impact on online lifelong learning. RUSC, Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 8 (1), 111–127.

Verderber, K., & Verderber, R. (2004). Interact: Interpersonal communication concepts, skills and contexts . Oxford University Press.

Rodrigo Alsina, M. (2001). Teorías de la comunicación. Ámbitos, métodos y perspectivas [Communication theory: Areas, methods and perspectives] . Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

Kwok, D., & Yang, S. (2017). Evaluating the intention to use ICT collaborative tools in a social constructivist environment. International journal of educational technology in Higher Education, 14 , Art. 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0070-1

Miyazoe, T., & Anderson, T. (2011). The interaction equivalency theorem: Research potential and its application to teaching. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning, held in Madison, WI 3–5 August 2011. Retrieved 30 May 2019 from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9610/e6f633d5615ddd7dabec07378ec67a297acd.pdf .

Rodriguez, B. C. P., & Armellini, A. (2015). Expanding the interaction equivalency theorem. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16 . https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2085

Islam, A. T., Flint, J., Jaecks, P., & Cap, C. H. (2017). A proficient and versatile online student-teacher collaboration platform for large classroom lectures. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14 , Art. 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0067-9

Song, L., & McNary, S. W. (2011). Understanding students’ online interaction: Analysis of discussion board postings. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 10 (1), Art. 1.

Ferguson, R. (2010). Peer interaction: The experience of distance students at university level. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26 (6), 574–584.

Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Bures, E. M., Borokhovski, E., & Tamim, R. M. (2011). Interaction in distance education and online learning: Using evidence and theory to improve practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23 (2–3), 82–103.

Martin, F., Parker, M. A., & Deale, D. F. (2012). Examining interactivity in synchronous virtual classrooms. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13 (3), 228–261.

Ting, S. R., & Gonzalez, L. M. (2013). Quality of interactions in face-to-face and hybrid career development courses: An exploration of students’ perceptions. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9 (3), 316–326.

Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., Schroder, K. E., & Kuo, Y. T. (2014). A case study of integrating interwise: Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and satisfaction in synchronous online learning environments. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning . https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1664

Moore, J. (2014). Effects of online interaction and instructor presence on students’ satisfaction and success with online undergraduate public relations courses. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 69 (3), 271–288.

Kyei-Blankson, L., Ntuli, E., & Donnelly, H. (2016). Establishing the importance of interaction and presence to student learning in online environments. World Journal of Educational Research, 3 (1), 48–65.

Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10 (2), 1–13.

Koh, M. H., Barbour, M., & Hill, J. R. (2010). Strategies for instructors on how to improve online groupwork. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43 (2), 183–205.

Ragusa, A. T. (2017). Technologically-mediated communication: Student expectations and experiences in a FOMO society. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14 , Art. 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0077-7

Henkel, M. (2012). Interaction at a distance: An approach for redesigning for distance education. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 6 (5), 806–812.

Balaji, M. S., & Chakrabarti, D. (2010). Student interactions in online discussion forum: Empirical research from “media richness theory” perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9 (1), 1–22.

Fidalgo, P., & Thormann, J. (2012). A social network analysis comparison of an experienced and a novice instructor in online teaching. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning , 1, 1–15. Retrieved 30 May 2019 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ979607.pdf .

Thormann, J., & Zimmerman, I. (Eds.). (2012). The complete step-by-step guide to designing and teaching online courses . Teachers College Press at Columbia University.

Williams, K., Cameron, B., Morgan, K., & Wade, C. (2012). Facilitation of online group projects: Insights from experienced faculty members. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning. held in Madison, WI 8–10 August 2012.

Thormann, J., Gable, S., Fidalgo, P. S., & Blakeslee, G. (2013). Interaction, critical thinking, and social network analysis (SNA) in online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14 (3), 294–318.

Murray, M. C., Pérez, J., Geist, D. B., & Hedrick, A. (2012). Student interaction with online course content: Build it and they might come. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11 (1), 125–140.

Anderson, T. (2003b). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4 (2), 9–14.

Ertmer, P. A., Sadaf, A., & Ertmer, D. J. (2011). Student-content interactions in online courses: The role of question prompts in facilitating higher-level engagement with course content. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23 (2–3), Art. 157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9047-6

Miller, G. (2015). Associations between learner interaction and achievement in an online course: A longitudinal study 1. NACTA Journal, 59 (3), 197–201.

Su, B., Bonk, C. J., Magjuka, R. J., Liu, X., & Lee, S. H. (2005). The importance of interaction in web-based education: A program-level case study of online MBA courses. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4 (1), Art. 1.

West, P. Teachers’ computer skills self-taught, Not a Result of Training, Survey Finds, 1990. Education Week Online: http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/1990/05/09/09390010.h09.html .

Abrantes, S., & Gouveia, L. (2011). Comparing Google groups use by evaluating flow experience and generated messages in laptop and desktop higher education students. In proceedings of informing science & IT education conference (InSITE) 2011 (pp. 1–20). Novi Sad, Serbia: Higher education technical School of Professional Studies, 18–23 June 2011. http://proceedings.informingscience.org/InSITE2011/InSITE11p001-020Abrantes279.pdf

Harris, A. (2006). Using Google groups in the classroom: A case study. Sprouts working papers on. Information Systems, 6 (69), 1–9. http://sprouts.aisnet.org/1161/1/Paper_Google_groups.pdf

Marín, V., & de Benito, B. (2011). A design of a postgraduate course on Google apps based on an institutional personal learning environment (iPLE). In Proceedings of the the PLE conference (pp. 1–5). University of Southampton. http://gte.uib.es/pape/gte/sites/gte.uib.es.pape.gte/files/workshopiple_definitivo.pdf

Srba, J. (2010). An experiment with using google tools for project supervision at tertiary education. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on computer systems and technologies and workshop for PhD students in computing—CompSysTech’10 (pp. 430–435). Sofia, Bulgaria, 18–19 June 2010.

Beer, C., Clark, K., & Jones, D. (2010, December 5–10). Indicators of engagement. In C. H. Steel, M. J. Keppell, P. Gerbic & S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology and transformation for an unknown future. Proceedings ascilite Sydney 2010 (pp. 75–86). Ascilite. http://ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney10/procs/Beer-full.pdf

Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2006). Nonvoluntary class participation in graduate discussion courses: Effects of grading and cold calling. Journal of Management Education, 30 (2), 354–377. http://jme.sagepub.com/content/30/2/354.full.pdf

Garrison, D. (2007). Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 1 (1), 61–72. http://wiki.sln.suny.edu/download/attachments/4032379/v11n1_8garrison.pdf

Knapp, N. (2014). Flipping an online course using Google hangouts. Proceedings of the conference on higher education pedagogy (pp. 191–192). : Virginia Tech.

van Rensburg, J. (2021). Joalise; Rauscher, Willem strategies for fostering critical thinking dispositions in the technology classroom. International Journal of Technology and Design Education . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09690-6

Sadik, A. (2008). Digital storytelling: A meaningful technology-integrated approach for engaged student learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56 , 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9091-8

Smeda, N., Dakich, E., & Sharda, N. (2014). The effectiveness of digital storytelling in the classrooms: A comprehensive study. Smart Learning Environments, 1 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0006-3

Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2019). Online communication and interaction in distance higher education: A framework study of good practice. International Review of Education, 65 , 605–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09792-3

Price, J. K. (2015). Transforming learning for the smart learning environment: Lessons learned from the Intel education initiatives. Smart Learning Environments, 2 , 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-015-0022-y

Rambe, P. (2017). Spaces for interactive engagement or technology for differential academic participation? Google groups for collaborative learning at a south African university. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29 , 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9141-5

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Training and Development, The English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

K. Venkat Reddy

Department of English Language Teaching, The English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

G. Suvarna Lakshmi

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Department of English Language Teaching, English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this chapter

Reddy, K.V., Lakshmi, G.S. (2024). ICT and Critical Thinking. In: Reddy, K.V., Lakshmi, G.S. (eds) Critical Thinking for Professional and Language Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37951-2_6

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37951-2_6

Published : 04 September 2024

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-031-37950-5

Online ISBN : 978-3-031-37951-2

eBook Packages : Education Education (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Find a journal
Track your research

IMAGES

(PDF) SUPPORTING STUDENTS' CRITICAL THINKING WITH A MOBILE LEARNING
PPT
How to teach critical thinking skills through digital learning
why is Importance of Critical Thinking Skills in Education
Tech Edge, Mobile Learning In The Classroom
60 Critical Thinking Strategies For Learning

VIDEO

Critical Thinking
5 Must Reads on Critical Thinking
Recent Developments in Deep Representation Learning...
Meaning of Critical Thinking || How to apply critical thinking skills in Data analytics
Immersive Critical Thinking Activities: Think Like A Scientist
Exploring the effectiveness of ChatGPT in enhancing critical thinking and problem-solving skills

COMMENTS

PDF Higher Order mLearning: Critical Thinking in Mobile Learning
to individually or collectively participate in critical thinking. Mobile learning "can create a learning experience that transcends time and place, allowing for continued exposure to peer experience with support and collaboration that moves beyond physical classroom walls" (Shippee and Keengwe, 2014). ...
PDF Supporting Students' Critical Thinking With a Mobile Learning
2.3 Mobile Learning and Critical Thinking Mobile technology has a very big potential to promote the shift of traditional pedagogy that is teacher- centered to student-centered, and also engagement ...
25 Critical Thinking Apps For Extended Student Learning
3. Elevate. Grade Levels: 8-12+. Developer Description. Elevate is another app that focuses on improving cognitive skills, including critical thinking. It offers a variety of games and challenges that target different areas, such as memory, comprehension, processing speed, and analytical thinking.
PDF Promoting Students' Critical Thinking & Problem Solving Skills Via
Critical Thinking & Problem Solving belong to 21st century skills that enhance ways of thinking, learning, working and living in the world. When combined with well-designed educational activities, mobile technology has the capacity to foster these abilities. This study evaluates the Critical Thinking & Problem Solving skills of ninth-grade ...
Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning
A quasi-experimental research design was used to investigate the effectiveness of mobile technology used within a collaborative learning experience to facilitate student engagement and critical thinking. Using a multimethod model of analyzing effectiveness based on Lai and Wu, 2006 study, various data sources were used.
Cooperation begins: Encouraging critical thinking skills through
Critical thinking skills from cooperative learning: a mobile learning approach In Dickens' ' Hard Times' ( 1854 ), the Member of Parliament for Coketown, Thomas Gradgrind, insists that facts are the fundamental and essential building blocks of every educational activity.
Smart Learning in Support of Critical Thinking: Lessons ...
We develop a research-based framework for a transformative approach to support the development of inquiry learning and critical thinking skills in young children using smart technologies. ... E., & Ryu, H. (2016). Cooperation begins: encouraging critical thinking skills through cooperative reciprocity using a mobile learning game. Computers ...
PDF Development of Android-based Interactive Multimedia to Enhance Critical
According to Lee et al. (2016), in 21st-century learning. Critical thinking is one of the skills that students must have. According to Facione (2011), critical thinking aims to make an argument, interpret something, or solve a ... (2017), mobile learning is suitable for education because it is more efficient and can support the classroom's learning
PDF Enhancing students' critical thinking and visualisation skills through
content using a mobile augmented reality application for learning chemical bonds (called CBOND) and completed critical thinking tasks each week. This study employed data mining using a decision tree to predict the path to improving students' visualisation and critical thinking skills in learning chemical bonds.
The Development of Critical Thinking Skills in Mobile Learning: Fact
The study aims to reveal the attitude of students and teachers to mobile learning; explore the possibility of developing critical thinking skills in mobile learning; and also evaluate knowledge ...
Interactive learning environment as a source of critical thinking
Critical thinking was analyzed within the framework of studying chemistry and physics using mobile learning tools [ 6, 7 ]. The benefits of integrating gadgets were noted as both students' critical thinking skills and academic performance improved. Critical thinking improvement is often classified as the most important goal of formal ...
Improving critical thinking skills in mobile learning
Abstract. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of mobile learning over the critical thinking skills. The volunteer sample in this experimental study consisted of 41 undergraduates enrolled in computer education classes at the Near East University in North Cyprus. The students' critical thinking disposition was measured by ...
Mobile learning application: Infusing critical thinking in the EFL
The findings imply that critical thinking activities and learning affordances provided in the 'English with Noni' application is a potential tool to enhance students' critical thinking infused in the EFL class, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic situation, by emphasizing self-regulated learning. The emergence of mobile learning applications facilitates the pedagogical approach to ...
The impact of pocket mobile learning to improve critical thinking
The purposes of the research is examined the influence of using pocket mobile learning to increase the students critical thinking skills. Pocket mobile learning is a determining by media using mobile devices. This investigation is the quasi experiment managing by post-test control group design.
Mobile learning application: Infusing critical thinking in the EFL
Even though mobile learning is potential for students' learning improvement, there is a scarcity of studies on the impact of mobile learning applications on developing critical thinking through the emergence of mobile learning applications that facilitate the pedagogical approach to develop students' critical thinking (Chen et al., 2019).
What Are Critical Thinking Skills and Why Are They Important?
According to the University of the People in California, having critical thinking skills is important because they are [1]: Universal. Crucial for the economy. Essential for improving language and presentation skills. Very helpful in promoting creativity. Important for self-reflection.
Reading Mobile Applications on Students' Critical Thinking Skills: a
Therefore, reading mobile applications can help students gain knowledge, improve their reading skills, and develop their critical thinking skills. Discover the world's research 25+ million members
Building Critical Thinking Skills Through a New Design Mobile-Based
PaperBuilding Critical Thinking Skills Through a New Design Mobile-Based Interactive Learning… Table 1. The results of the critical thinking skills of 10th-grade students in the subject of record management in vocational high schools in surakarta No Score Criteria Frequency Percentage 1 76-100 Very Good (VG) 2 10% 2 51-75 Good (G) 5 25%
PDF THE CURRENT PERSPECTIVES, THEORIES AND PRACTICES OF MOBILE LEARNING
technologies to enchance learning. Thus, mobile learning has been defined differently by different people. This study is a review of m-learning literature for understanding and discussion of current perspectives and theories in mobile learning. Additionally, some m-learning practices that are implemented in different sectors such as
Students' Learning Independence and Critical Thinking Ability Using
This study aims to determine students' autonomous knowledge and critical thinking abilities (CTA) using mobile learning technology (MLT). This research is a quantitative study involving 83 students from four junior high schools in the city of Mataram. The data collection for independent learning and students' CTA was carried out by giving tests ...
Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning
A quasi-experimental research design was used to investigate the effectiveness of mobile technology used within a collaborative learning experience to facilitate student engagement and critical thinking. Using a multimethod model of analyzing effectiveness based on Lai and Wu, 2006 study, various data sources were used.
ICT and Critical Thinking
While digital story telling is of the effective teaching-learning tool, teachers' expertise in using the tool to the maximum potential is an influential factor to experience better learning outcomes in general and better critical thinking and associate skills in particular.
Fostering Critical Thinking Skills in Tertiary-Level Students for Media
Critical thinking assumes a pivotal role in MIL as it plays a determining role in assessing the reliability of information sources, swiftly recognising fake news, and effectively sifting through information to uncover the truth. ... Widiandari, L. A., & Redhana, I. W. (2021). Students' critical thinking skills in case study-based learning ...
PDF The Development of Android-Based Learning Mobile App to Practice
Critical thinking allows students to examine problems in an integrated and structured way, formulate innovative solutions, and reflect on them. Critical thinking is a process that culminates in making . logical conclusions or decisions about what to believe and what actions to take (Ennis, 1991) . In addition, critical thinking is a . I ...
Executive functions as predictors of critical thinking: Behavioral and
Theories of critical thinking suggest that executive functions play crucial roles in students' critical thinking performance. However, very little empirical research has examined the potential confounding factors of fluid intelligence and thinking dispositions on the relationship between executive functions and critical thinking. Study 1, based on a large sample of university students ...