Greek Philosophy
Server costs fundraiser 2024.
Ancient Greek Philosophy is a system of thought, first developed in the 6th century BCE, which was informed by a focus on the First Cause of observable phenomena. Prior to the development of this system by Thales of Miletus (l. c. 585 BCE), the world was understood by the ancient Greeks as having been created by the gods.
Without denying the existence of the gods, Thales suggested that the First Cause of existence was water. This suggestion brought no backlash of charges of impiety because water, as a life-giving agency which encircled the earth, was already associated with the gods by Greek religion . Thales' followers, Anaximander (l. c. 610 - c. 546 BCE) and Anaximenes (l. c. 546 BCE) continued his studies and examinations of the nature of reality but suggested different elements as the First Cause.
These three men initiated the path of inquiry known as ancient Greek philosophy, which was developed by the so-called Pre-Socratic Philosophers , defined as those who engaged in philosophic speculation and the development of different schools of thought from Thales' first efforts up to the time of Socrates of Athens (l. 470/469-399 BCE), who, according to his most famous pupil Plato (l. 424/423-348/347 BCE), enlarged the scope of philosophy to address not only the First Cause but also the individual's moral and ethical obligation to self-improvement for its own sake and the good of the greater community. Plato's work inspired his student Aristotle of Stagira (l. 384-322 BCE) to establish his own school with his own vision based on but significantly different from Plato's own.
Aristotle would go on to become the tutor of Alexander the Great (l. 356-323 BCE) who, through his conquest of Persia , spread the concepts of Greek philosophy throughout the East from the regions of modern-day Turkey up through Iraq and Iran, across through Russia, down to India , and back toward Egypt where it would influence the development of the school of thought known as Neo-Platonism as formulated by the philosopher Plotinus (l. c. 202-274 CE) whose vision, developed from Plato's, of the Divine Mind and a higher reality which informs the observable world would influence that of Paul the Apostle (l. c. 5-64 CE) in his understanding and interpretation of the mission and meaning of Jesus Christ , laying the foundation for Christianity 's development.
The works of Aristotle, which would come to inform Christianity as much as Plato's, would also be instrumental in the formulation of Islamic thought after Islam was established in the 7th century CE as well as the theological concepts of Judaism . In the present day, Greek philosophy is the underlying form of belief systems, cultural values, and legal codes all around the world as it has largely contributed to their development.
Ancient Greek Religion
Ancient Greek religion maintained that the observable world and everything in it was created by the immortal gods who took a personal interest in the lives of human beings to guide and protect them; in return, humanity thanked their benefactors through praise and worship, which eventually became institutionalized through temples, clergy, and ritual. The Greek writer Hesiod (l. 8th century BCE) codified this belief system in his work Theogony and the Greek poet Homer (l. 8th century BCE) would illustrate it fully in his Iliad and Odyssey .
Humans were created, as well as all plants and animals, by the gods of Mount Olympus who regulated the seasons and were understood as the First Cause of existence. Stories, now known as Greek mythology , developed to explain various aspects of life and how the gods should be understood and worshipped and therefore, in this cultural climate, there was no intellectual or spiritual motivation to search for a First Cause because that was already well established and defined.
Origin of Greek Philosophy
Thales of Miletus was a cultural aberration in that, instead of accepting his culture 's theological definition of a First Cause, he sought his own in a reasoned inquiry into the natural world, working from what he could observe backwards to what had caused it to come into being. The question later philosophers, historians, and social scientists have posed, however, is how he came to begin his inquiry. Modern-day scholars are by no means in agreement on an answer to this question and, generally speaking, maintain two views:
- Thales is an original thinker who developed a novel way of inquiry.
- Thales developed his philosophy from Babylonian and Egyptian sources.
Egypt had a long-established trade relationship with the cities of Mesopotamia , including Babylon of course, by Thales' time, and both the Mesopotamians and Egyptians believed that water was the underlying element of existence. The Babylonian creation story (from the Enuma Elish , c. 1750 BCE in written form) tells the story of the goddess Tiamat (meaning sea) and her defeat by the god Marduk who then creates the world from her remains. The Egyptian creation story also features water as the primordial element of chaos from which earth arises, the god Atum brings under his control, and order is established, eventually resulting in the creation of the other gods, animals, and human beings.
It has long been established that ancient Greek philosophy begins in the Greek colonies of Ionia along the coast of Asia Minor as the first three Pre-Socratic philosophers all came from Ionian Miletus and the Milesian School is the first Greek philosophical school of thought. The standard explanation as to how Thales first conceived of his philosophy has been the first one cited above. The second theory, however, actually makes more sense in that no school of thought develops in a vacuum and there is nothing in the Greek culture of the 6th century BCE to suggest that intellectual inquiry into the cause of observable phenomena was valued or encouraged.
Scholar G. G. M. James notes that many later philosophers, from Pythagoras to Plato, are said to have studied in Egypt and, in part, to have developed their philosophies there. He suggests that Thales might also have studied in Egypt and established this practice as a tradition others would follow. While this certainly may be the case, there is no documentation to definitively support it while it is known that Thales did study in Babylon. He would have certainly been exposed to Mesopotamian, as well as Egyptian, philosophy in his studies there, and this was most likely the source of his inspiration.
Pre-Socratic Philosophers
However he may have first developed his vision of a reasoned, empirical inquiry into the nature of reality, Thales began an intellectual movement which inspired others to do the same. These philosophers are known as Pre-Socratic because they pre-date Socrates, and following the formulation of scholar Forrest E. Baird, the major Pre-Socratic philosophers were:
- Thales of Miletus – l. c. 585 BCE
- Anaximander – l. c. 610 - c. 546 BCE
- Anaximenes – l. c. 546 BCE
- Pythagoras – l. c. 571 - c. 497 BCE
- Xenophanes of Colophon – l. c. 570 - c. 478 BCE
- Heraclitus – l. c. 500 BCE
- Parmenides of Elea – l. c. 485 BCE
- Zeno of Elea – l. c. 465 BCE
- Empedocles – l. c. 484-424 BCE
- Anaxagoras – l. c. 500 - c. 428 BCE
- Democritus – l. c. 460 - c. 370 BCE
- Leucippus – l. c. 5th century BCE
- Protagoras – l. c. 485 - c. 415 BCE
- Gorgias – l. c. 427 BCE
- Critias l. c. 460-403 BCE
The first three were focused on the First Cause for existence. Thales claimed it was water, but Anaximander rejected this in favor of the higher concept of the apeiron – “the unlimited, boundless, infinite, or indefinite” (Baird, 10) – which was an eternal creative force. Anaximenes claimed air as the First Cause for the same reason Thales chose water: he felt it was the element which was the most basic component of all others in varied forms.
The definition of a First Cause was rejected by Pythagoras who claimed number as Truth. Numbers have no beginning or end and neither does the world or a person's soul. One's immortal soul goes through many incarnations, acquiring wisdom, and although Pythagoras suggests it finally joins with a higher soul (God), how he defined that oversoul is unclear. Xenophanes answers this with his claim that there is only one God who is the First Cause and also governor of the world. He rejected the anthropomorphic vision of the Olympian Gods for a monotheistic vision of God as Pure Spirit.
His younger contemporary, Heraclitus, rejected this view and replaced “God” with “Change”. To Heraclitus, life was flux – change was the very definition of “life” – and all things came into being and passed on owing simply to the nature of existence.
Parmenides combined these two views in his Eleatic School of thought which taught Monism, the belief that all of observable reality is of one single substance, uncreated, and indestructible. Parmenides' thought was developed by his pupil Zeno of Elea, who created a series of logical paradoxes proving that plurality was an illusion of the senses and reality was actually uniform.
Empedocles combined his predecessor's philosophies with his own, claiming that the four elements were brought into being by strife by natural forces clashing with each other but were sustained by love, which he defined as a creative and regenerating force. Anaxagoras took this idea and developed his concept of like-and-not-like and “seeds”. Nothing can come from what it is not like and everything is comprised of particles (“seeds”) which constitute that particular thing.
His "seed” theory would influence the development of the concept of the atom by Leucippus and his student Democritus, who, in looking into the basic "seed" of all things, claimed that the entire universe is made up of “un-cutables” known as atamos . The atomic theory inspired Leucippus in his theory of fatalism in that, just as atoms constituted the observable world, so their dissolution and reformation directed a person's fate.
Sign up for our free weekly email newsletter!
The works of these philosophers (and the many others not mentioned here) encouraged the development of the profession of the Sophist – highly educated intellectuals who, for a price, would instruct the upper-class male youth of Greece in these various philosophies as part of their goal in teaching art of skill in persuasion for winning arguments. Lawsuits were common in ancient Greece, especially at Athens, and the skills the Sophists offered were highly valued. Just as the earlier philosophers argued against what was accepted as “common knowledge”, so the Sophists taught the means by which one could “make the worse appear the better cause” in any argument.
Among the most famous of these teachers were Protagoras, Gorgias, and Critias. Protagoras is best known for his claim that “man is the measure of all things”, everything is relative to individual experience and interpretation. Gorgias taught that what people call “knowledge” is only opinion and actual knowledge is incomprehensible. Critias, an early follower of Socrates, is best known for his argument that religion was created by strong and clever men to control the weak and gullible.
Socrates, Plato, & the Socratic Schools
Socrates is considered by some to have been a kind of Sophist, but one who taught freely without expectation of reward. Socrates himself wrote nothing, and all that is known of his philosophy comes from his two students Plato and Xenophon (l. 430 - c. 354 BCE) and the forms his philosophy took in the later philosophic schools founded by his other followers such as Antisthenes of Athens (l. c. 445-365 BCE), Aristippus of Cyrene (l. c. 435-356 BCE), and others.
Socrates' focus was on the improvement of individual character, which he defined as the “soul”, in order to live a virtuous life. His central vision is summed up in the claim attributed to him by Plato that “an unexamined life is not worth living” ( Apology 38b) and that one should not, therefore, simply repeat what one has learned from others but, instead, examine what one believes – and how one's beliefs inform one's behavior – in order to know one's self truly and behave justly. His central teachings are given in four of Plato's dialogues, usually published under the title The Last Days of Socrates – Euthyphro , Apology , Crito , and Phaedo – which recount his indictment by the Athenians on charges of impiety and corrupting the youth, his trial, time in prison, and execution.
Plato's other dialogues – almost all of which feature Socrates as the central character – may or may not reflect Socrates' actual thought. Even contemporaries of Plato claimed that the “Socrates” who appeared in his dialogues bore no resemblance to the teacher they had known. Antisthenes founded the Cynic school, which focused on simplicity in living – on behavior as character – and denial of any luxury as its basic tenet, while Aristippus founded the Cyrenaic school of hedonism in which luxury and pleasure were held to be the highest goals one could aspire to. Both of these men were students of Socrates, just as Plato was, but their philosophies have little or nothing in common with his.
Whatever the historical Socrates may have taught, the philosophy Plato attributes to him is based on the concept of an eternal realm of Truth (the Realm of Forms) of which observable reality is only a reflection. The concepts of Truth, Goodness, Beauty, and others exist in this realm, and what people refer to as true, good, or beautiful are only attempts at definition, not the things themselves. Plato claimed that people's understanding was darkened and limited by acceptance of the “true lie” (also known as the Lie in the Soul), which caused them to believe wrongly about the most important aspects of human life. In order to free one's self from this lie, one had to recognize the existence of the higher realm and align one's understanding with it through the pursuit of wisdom.
Aristotle & Plotinus
It could be that Plato purposefully attributed his own philosophical ideas to Socrates to avoid the same fate as his teacher. Socrates was convicted of impiety and executed in 399 BCE, scattering his followers. Plato himself went to Egypt and visited a number of other places before returning to Athens to set up his Academy and begin writing his dialogues. Among his most famous students at the new school was Aristotle, son of Nichomachus from Stagira near the Macedonian border.
Aristotle rejected Plato's Theory of Forms and focused on a teleological approach to philosophical inquiry in which first causes are arrived at by examining final states. One would not, Aristotle claims, try to understand how a tree grows from a seed by contemplating its “treeness” but by looking at the tree itself, observing how it grows, what constitutes a seed, what soil seems best for its growth. In the same way, one cannot understand humanity by considering what a human “should” be but by recognizing what one is and how an individual human could improve.
Aristotle believed that the entire purpose of human life was happiness. People were unhappy because they confused material wealth or position or relationships – all of which were impermanent – with lasting, internal satisfaction, which was cultivated by developing arete (“personal excellence”), which allowed one to experience eudaimonia (“to be possessed of a good spirit”). Having attained eudaimonia , one could not lose it, and one could then see clearly to help others toward the same state. He believed that the First Cause was a force he defined as the Prime Mover – that set everything in motion – but that, afterwards, things which were in motion stayed in motion. Concerns about a First Cause were not as important to him as an understanding of how the observable world worked and how best to live in it.
Aristotle became the tutor of Alexander the Great who would then spread his philosophy, as well as that of his predecessors throughout the world of the Near East and as far as India while, at the same time, Aristotle set up his own school, the Lyceum, in Athens and taught students there. He investigated virtually every area and discipline of human knowledge throughout the rest of his life and was known simply as The Master by later writers.
Not every one of these later thinkers ascribed to his philosophy completely, however, and among these was Plotinus who took the best of Plato's idealism and Aristotle's teleological approach and combined them in the philosophy known as Neo-Platonism, which also contained elements of Indian, Egyptian, and Persian mysticism. In this philosophy, there is an Ultimate Truth - so great that it cannot be comprehended by the human mind - which was never created, can never be destroyed, and cannot even be named; Plotinus called this the nous which translates as Divine Mind.
The purpose of life is to awaken the soul to awareness of the Divine Mind and then live accordingly. That which people call “evil” is caused by attachment to the impermanent things of this world and the illusions which people think make them happy; true “good” is recognition of the impermanent and ultimately unsatisfying nature of the material world and a focus on the Divine Mind from which all goodness in life comes.
Plotinus answers Thales' question regarding the First Cause with the answer he was trying to move away from, the divine. Like the gods of ancient Greece, the nous was a belief that could not be proven; one only knew of it by observable phenomena interpreted according to one's belief. Plotinus' insistence on the reality of the nous was encouraged by his dissatisfaction with any other answer. In order for anything in the world to be true, there has to be a source for Truth, and if everything is relative to the individual, as Protagoras claimed, then there is no such thing as Truth, there is only opinion. Plotinus, like Plato, rejected Protagoras' view and established the Divine Mind as the source not only of truth but of all life and consciousness itself.
His Neo-Platonic thought would influence Saint Paul in his development of the Christian vision. The Christian god was understood by Paul in very much the same terms as Plotinus' nous, only as an individual deity with a distinct character rather than a nebulous Divine Mind. Aristotle's works, which had been translated and were better known in the Near East, influenced the development of Islamic theology while Jewish scholars drew on Plato, Aristotle, and Plotinus in the formation of their own.
Ancient Greek philosophy also came to inform cultural values around the world, not only initially through the conquests of Alexander the Great but through its dissemination by later writers. Legal codes and secular concepts of morality up to the present day are derived from the philosophy of the Greeks, and even those who have never read the works of a single ancient Greek philosopher have been influenced by them to greater or lesser degrees. From Thales' initial inquiry into first causes to the intricate metaphysics of Plotinus, ancient Greek philosophy found an admiring audience searching for the same answers to the questions it posed and, as it spread, provided the cultural foundation for Western Civilization .
Subscribe to topic Related Content Books Cite This Work License
Bibliography
- Aristotle & McKeon, R. Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton University Press, 1994.
- Baird, F. E. Philosophic Classics: Ancient Philosophy. Routledge, 2010.
- Freeman, K. Ancilla to the Pre-Socratic Philosophers. Harvard University Press, 1983.
- Hesiod & Most, G. M. Hesiod's Works. Harvard University Press, 2018.
- Homer & Fagles, R. Homer's Iliad. The Folio Society, 1997.
- Homer & Fagles, R. The Odyssey of Homer. The Folio Society, 1997.
- James, G. G. M. Stolen Legacy: The Egyptian Origins of Western Philosophy. Echo Point Books Media, 2016.
- Plato & Jowett, B. The Dialogues of Plato. Scribners Publishing, 2000.
- Waterfield, R. Athens: A History From Ancient Ideal to Modern City. Basic Books, 2009.
- Waterfield, R. The First Philosophers: The Presocratics and the Sophists. Oxford University Press, 2009.
About the Author
Translations
We want people all over the world to learn about history. Help us and translate this definition into another language!
Questions & Answers
What is the meaning of philosophy, what is greek philosophy, who are the most famous greek philosophers, why is greek philosophy important, related content.
Hipparchia of Maroneia
Hipparchia the Cynic: Devoted Wife, Mother, & Outspoken Greek Philosopher
Melissus of Samos
Antisthenes of Athens
Emperor Zeno
Free for the world, supported by you.
World History Encyclopedia is a non-profit organization. For only $5 per month you can become a member and support our mission to engage people with cultural heritage and to improve history education worldwide.
Recommended Books
External Links
Cite this work.
Mark, J. J. (2020, October 13). Greek Philosophy . World History Encyclopedia . Retrieved from https://www.worldhistory.org/Greek_Philosophy/
Chicago Style
Mark, Joshua J.. " Greek Philosophy ." World History Encyclopedia . Last modified October 13, 2020. https://www.worldhistory.org/Greek_Philosophy/.
Mark, Joshua J.. " Greek Philosophy ." World History Encyclopedia . World History Encyclopedia, 13 Oct 2020. Web. 09 Sep 2024.
License & Copyright
Submitted by Joshua J. Mark , published on 13 October 2020. The copyright holder has published this content under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike . This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon this content non-commercially, as long as they credit the author and license their new creations under the identical terms. When republishing on the web a hyperlink back to the original content source URL must be included. Please note that content linked from this page may have different licensing terms.
- History & Society
- Science & Tech
- Biographies
- Animals & Nature
- Geography & Travel
- Arts & Culture
- Games & Quizzes
- On This Day
- One Good Fact
- New Articles
- Lifestyles & Social Issues
- Philosophy & Religion
- Politics, Law & Government
- World History
- Health & Medicine
- Browse Biographies
- Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates
- Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates
- Environment
- Fossils & Geologic Time
- Entertainment & Pop Culture
- Sports & Recreation
- Visual Arts
- Demystified
- Image Galleries
- Infographics
- Top Questions
- Britannica Kids
- Saving Earth
- Space Next 50
- Student Center
- Introduction
Monistic cosmologies
Pluralistic cosmologies, epistemology of appearance, metaphysics of number, anthropology and relativism.
- Disciples and commentators
- Epicureanism
- Neo-Pythagoreanism and Neoplatonism
- What did Plato do?
- What is Plato known for?
- What were Plato’s contributions to society?
- When was Plato alive?
- What was Plato’s family like?
Greek philosophy
Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.
- Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Ancient Greek Philosophy
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Presocratic Philosophy
- Table Of Contents
Greek philosophy , in the history of Western philosophy , the foundational and profound philosophical contributions of the leading thinkers of ancient Greece , including the pre-Socratic cosmologists of the 6th and 5th centuries bce ; the intellectual giants of Classical Athens — Socrates , Plato , and Aristotle ; and the Hellenistic founders of Stoicism , Epicureanism , and other major schools of Greco-Roman philosophy .
The pre-Socratic philosophers
Cosmology and the metaphysics of matter.
Because the earliest Greek philosophers of classical antiquity focused their attention upon the origin and nature of the physical world, they are often called cosmologists, or naturalists. Although monistic views (which trace the origin of the world to a single substance) prevailed at first, they were soon followed by several pluralistic theories (which trace it to several ultimate substances).
There is a consensus , dating back at least to the 4th century bce and continuing to the present, that the first Greek philosopher was Thales of Miletus (flourished 6th century bce ). In Thales’ time the word philosopher (“lover of wisdom”) had not yet been coined. Thales was counted, however, among the legendary Seven Wise Men (Sophoi), whose name derives from a term that then designated inventiveness and practical wisdom rather than speculative insight. Thales demonstrated these qualities by trying to give the mathematical knowledge that he derived from the Babylonians a more exact foundation and by using it for the solution of practical problems—such as the determination of the distance of a ship as seen from the shore or of the height of the Egyptian pyramids. Although he was also credited with predicting an eclipse of the Sun, it is likely that he merely gave a natural explanation of one on the basis of Babylonian astronomical knowledge .
Thales is considered the first Greek philosopher because he was the first to give a purely natural explanation of the origin of the world, free from mythological ingredients. He held that everything had come out of water—an explanation based on the discovery of fossil sea animals far inland. His tendency (and that of his immediate successors) to give nonmythological explanations was undoubtedly prompted by the fact that all of them lived on the coast of Asia Minor , surrounded by a number of nations whose civilizations were much further advanced than that of the Greeks and whose own mythological explanations varied greatly. It appeared necessary, therefore, to make a fresh start on the basis of what a person could observe and infer by looking at the world as it presented itself. This procedure naturally resulted in a tendency to make sweeping generalizations on the basis of rather restricted, though carefully checked, observations.
Thales’ disciple and successor, Anaximander of Miletus (610–c. 546 bce ), tried to give a more elaborate account of the origin and development of the ordered world (the cosmos). According to him, it developed out of the apeiron (“unlimited”), something both infinite and indefinite (without distinguishable qualities). Within this apeiron something arose to produce the opposites of hot and cold. These at once began to struggle with each other and produced the cosmos. The cold (and wet) partly dried up (becoming solid earth), partly remained (as water), and—by means of the hot—partly evaporated (becoming air and mist), its evaporating part (by expansion) splitting up the hot into fiery rings, which surround the whole cosmos. Because these rings are enveloped by mist, however, there remain only certain breathing holes that are visible to human beings, appearing to them as the Sun, Moon, and stars. Anaximander was the first to realize that upward and downward are not absolute but that downward means toward the middle of the Earth and upward away from it, so that the Earth had no need to be supported (as Thales had believed) by anything. Starting from Thales’ observations, Anaximander tried to reconstruct the development of life in more detail. Life, being closely bound up with moisture, originated in the sea. All land animals, he held, are descendants of sea animals; because the first humans as newborn infants could not have survived without parents, Anaximander believed that they were born within an animal of another kind—specifically, a sea animal in which they were nurtured until they could fend for themselves. Gradually, however, the moisture will be partly evaporated until in the end all things will return into the undifferentiated apeiron , “in order to pay the penalty for their injustice”—that of having struggled against one another.
Anaximander’s successor, Anaximenes of Miletus (flourished c. 545 bce ), taught that air was the origin of all things. His position was for a long time thought to have been a step backward because, like Thales, he placed a special kind of matter at the beginning of the development of the world. But this criticism missed the point. Neither Thales nor Anaximander appear to have specified the way in which the other things arose out of water or apeiron . Anaximenes, however, declared that the other types of matter arose out of air by condensation and rarefaction. In this way, what to Thales had been merely a beginning became a fundamental principle that remained essentially the same through all of its transmutations. Thus, the term arche , which originally simply meant “beginning,” acquired the new meaning of “principle,” a term that henceforth played an enormous role in philosophy down to the present. This concept of a principle that remains the same through many transmutations is, furthermore, the presupposition of the idea that nothing can come out of nothing and that all of the comings to be and passings away that human beings observe are nothing but transmutations of something that essentially remains the same eternally. In this way it also lies at the bottom of all of the conservation laws—the laws of the conservation of matter , force, and energy—that have been basic in the development of physics . Although Anaximenes of course did not realize all of the implications of his idea, its importance can hardly be exaggerated.
The first three Greek philosophers have often been called “hylozoists,” because they seemed to believe in a kind of living matter ( see hylozoism ). But this is hardly an adequate characterization. It is, rather, characteristic of them that they did not clearly distinguish between kinds of matter, forces, and qualities, nor between physical and emotional qualities. The same entity is sometimes called “fire” and sometimes “the hot.” Heat appears sometimes as a force and sometimes as a quality , and again there is no clear distinction between warm and cold as physical qualities and the warmth of love and the cold of hate. To realize these ambiguities is important to an understanding of certain later developments in Greek philosophy.
Xenophanes of Colophon (c. 560–c. 478 bce ), a rhapsodist and philosophical thinker who emigrated from Asia Minor to Elea in southern Italy, was the first to articulate more clearly what was implied in Anaximenes’ philosophy. He criticized the popular notions of the gods, saying that people made the gods in their own image. But, more importantly, he argued that there could be only one God, the ruler of the universe, who must be eternal. For, being the strongest of all beings, he could not have come out of something less strong, nor could he be overcome or superseded by something else, because nothing could arise that is stronger than the strongest. The argument clearly rested on the axioms that nothing can come out of nothing and that nothing that exists can vanish.
These axioms were made more explicit and carried to their logical (and extreme) conclusions by Parmenides of Elea (born c. 515 bce ), the founder of the so-called school of Eleaticism , of whom Xenophanes has been regarded as the teacher and forerunner. In a philosophical poem, Parmenides insisted that “what is” cannot have come into being and cannot pass away because it would have to have come out of nothing or to become nothing, whereas nothing by its very nature does not exist. There can be no motion either, for it would have to be a motion into something that is—which is not possible since it would be blocked—or a motion into something that is not—which is equally impossible since what is not does not exist. Hence, everything is solid, immobile being. The familiar world, in which things move around, come into being, and pass away, is a world of mere belief ( doxa ). In a second part of the poem, however, Parmenides tried to give an analytical account of this world of belief, showing that it rested on constant distinctions between what is believed to be positive—i.e., to have real being, such as light and warmth—and what is believed to be negative—i.e., the absence of positive being, such as darkness and cold.
It is significant that Heracleitus of Ephesus (c. 540–c. 480 bce ), whose philosophy was later considered to be the very opposite of Parmenides’ philosophy of immobile being, came, in some fragments of his work, near to what Parmenides tried to show: the positive and the negative, he said, are merely different views of the same thing; death and life, day and night, and light and darkness are really one.
Parmenides had an enormous influence on the further development of philosophy. Most of the philosophers of the following two generations tried to find a way to reconcile his thesis that nothing comes into being nor passes away with the evidence presented to the senses. Empedocles of Acragas (c. 490–430 bce ) declared that there are four material elements (he called them the roots of everything) and two forces, love and hate, that did not come into being and would never pass away, increase, or diminish. But the elements are constantly mixed with one another by love and again separated by hate. Thus, through mixture and decomposition, composite things come into being and pass away. Because Empedocles conceived of love and hate as blind forces, he had to explain how, through random motion, living beings could emerge. This he did by means of a somewhat crude anticipation of the theory of the survival of the fittest . In the process of mixture and decomposition, the limbs and parts of various animals would be formed by chance. But they could not survive on their own; they would survive only when, by chance, they had come together in such a way that they were able to support and reproduce themselves. It was in this way that the various species were produced and continued to exist.
Anaxagoras of Clazomenae (c. 500–c. 428 bce ), a pluralist, believed that because nothing can really come into being, everything must be contained in everything, but in the form of infinitely small parts. In the beginning, all of these particles had existed in an even mixture, in which nothing could be distinguished, much like the indefinite apeiron of Anaximander. But then nous , or intelligence, began at one point to set these particles into a whirling motion, foreseeing that in this way they would become separated from one another and then recombine in the most various ways so as to produce gradually the world in which human beings live. In contrast to the forces assumed by Empedocles, the nous of Anaxagoras is not blind but foresees and intends the production of the cosmos, including living and intelligent beings; however, it does not interfere with the process after having started the whirling motion. This is a strange combination of a mechanical and a nonmechanical explanation of the world.
By far of greatest importance for the later development of philosophy and physical science was an attempt by the atomists Leucippus (flourished 5th century bce ) and Democritus (c. 460–c. 370 bce ) to solve the Parmenidean problem. Leucippus found the solution in the assumption that, contrary to Parmenides’ argument, the nothing does in a way exist—as empty space. There are, then, two fundamental principles of the physical world, empty space and filled space—the latter consisting of atoms that, in contrast to those of modern physics, are real atoms; that is, they are absolutely indivisible because nothing can penetrate to split them. On these foundations, laid by Leucippus, Democritus appears to have built a whole system, aiming at a complete explanation of the varied phenomena of the visible world by means of an analysis of its atomic structure. This system begins with elementary physical problems, such as why a hard body can be lighter than a softer one. The explanation is that the heavier body contains more atoms, which are equally distributed and of round shape; the lighter body, however, has fewer atoms, most of which have hooks by which they form rigid gratings. The system ends with educational and ethical questions. A sound and cheerful person, useful to his fellows, is literally well composed. Although destructive passions involve violent, long-distance atomic motions, education can help to contain them, creating a better composure. Democritus also developed a theory of the evolution of culture , which influenced later thinkers. Civilization, he thought, is produced by the needs of life, which compel human beings to work and to make inventions. When life becomes too easy because all needs are met, there is a danger that civilization will decay as people become unruly and negligent.
All of the post-Parmenidean philosophers, like Parmenides himself, presupposed that the real world is different from the one that human beings perceive. Thus arose the problems of epistemology , or theory of knowledge. According to Anaxagoras, everything is contained in everything. But this is not what people perceive. He solved this problem by postulating that, if there is a much greater amount of one kind of particle in a thing than of all other kinds, the latter are not perceived at all. The observation was then made that sometimes different persons or kinds of animals have different perceptions of the same things. He explained this phenomenon by assuming that like is perceived by like. If, therefore, in the sense organ of one person there is less of one kind of stuff than of another, that person will perceive the former less keenly than the latter. This reasoning was also used to explain why some animals see better at night and others during the day. According to Democritus, atoms have no sensible qualities, such as taste, smell, or color, at all. Thus, he tried to reduce all of them to tactile qualities (explaining a bright white color, for instance, as sharp atoms hitting the eye like needles), and he made a most elaborate attempt to reconstruct the atomic structure of things on the basis of their apparent sensible qualities.
Also of very great importance in the history of epistemology was Zeno of Elea (c. 495–c. 430 bce ), a younger friend of Parmenides. Parmenides had, of course, been severely criticized because of the strange consequences of his doctrine: that in reality there is no motion and no plurality because there is just one solid being. To support him, however, Zeno tried to show that the assumption that there is motion and plurality leads to consequences that are no less strange. This he did by means of his famous paradoxes , saying that the flying arrow rests since it can neither move in the place in which it is nor in a place in which it is not, and that Achilles cannot outrun a turtle because, when he has reached its starting point, the turtle will have moved to a further point, and so on ad infinitum—that, in fact, he cannot even start running, for, before traversing the stretch to the starting point of the turtle, he will have to traverse half of it, and again half of that, and so on ad infinitum. All of these paradoxes are derived from the problem of the continuum . Although they have often been dismissed as logical nonsense, many attempts have also been made to dispose of them by means of mathematical theorems, such as the theory of convergent series or the theory of sets . In the end, however, the logical difficulties raised in Zeno’s arguments have always come back with a vengeance , for the human mind is so constructed that it can look at a continuum in two ways that are not quite reconcilable.
All of the philosophies mentioned so far are in various ways historically akin to one another. Toward the end of the 6th century bce , however, there arose, quite independently, another kind of philosophy, which only later entered into interrelation with the developments just mentioned: the philosophy of Pythagoras of Samos (c. 580–c. 500 bce ; see also Pythagoreanism ). Pythagoras traveled extensively in the Middle East and in Egypt and, after his return to Samos, emigrated to southern Italy because of his dislike of the tyranny of Polycrates (c. 535–522 bce ). At Croton and Metapontum he founded a philosophical society with strict rules and soon gained considerable political influence. He appears to have brought his doctrine of the transmigration of souls from the Middle East. Much more important for the history of philosophy and science, however, was his doctrine that “all things are numbers,” which means that the essence and structure of all things can be determined by finding the numerical relations they express. Originally, this, too, was a very broad generalization made on the basis of comparatively few observations: for instance, that the same harmonies can be produced with different instruments—strings, pipes, disks, etc.—by means of the same numerical ratios—1:2, 2:3, 3:4—in one-dimensional extensions; the observation that certain regularities exist in the movements of the celestial bodies; and the discovery that the form of a triangle is determined by the ratio of the lengths of its sides. But because the followers of Pythagoras tried to apply their principle everywhere with the greatest of accuracy, one of them—Hippasus of Metapontum (flourished 5th century bce )—made one of the most fundamental discoveries in the entire history of science : that the side and diagonal of simple figures such as the square and the regular pentagon are incommensurable (i.e., their quantitative relation cannot be expressed as a ratio of integers). At first sight this discovery seemed to destroy the very basis of the Pythagorean philosophy, and the school thus split into two sects, one of which engaged in rather abstruse numerical speculations, while the other succeeded in overcoming the difficulty by ingenious mathematical inventions. Pythagorean philosophy also exerted a great influence on the later development of Plato’s thought.
The speculations described so far constitute , in many ways, the most important part of the history of Greek philosophy because all of the most fundamental problems of Western philosophy turned up here for the first time. One also finds here the formation of a great many concepts that have continued to dominate Western philosophy and science to the present day.
In the middle of the 5th century bce , Greek thinking took a somewhat different turn through the advent of the Sophists . The name is derived from the verb sophizesthai , “making a profession of being inventive and clever,” and aptly described the Sophists, who, in contrast to the philosophers mentioned so far, charged fees for their instruction. Philosophically they were, in a way, the leaders of a rebellion against the preceding development, which increasingly had resulted in the belief that the real world is quite different from the phenomenal world. “What is the sense of such speculations?” they asked, since no one lives in these so-called real worlds. This is the meaning of the pronouncement of Protagoras of Abdera (c. 490–c. 420 bce ) that “man is the measure of all things, of those which are that they are and of those which are not that they are not.” For human beings the world is what it appears to them to be, not something else; Protagoras illustrated his point by saying that it makes no sense to tell a person that it is really warm when he is shivering with cold, because for him it is cold—for him, the cold exists, is there.
His younger contemporary Gorgias of Leontini (flourished 5th century bce ), famous for his treatise on the art of oratory, made fun of the philosophers in his book Peri tou mē ontos ē peri physeōs (“On That Which Is Not; or, On Nature”), in which—referring to the “truly existing world,” also called “the nature of things”—he tried to prove (1) that nothing exists, (2) that if something existed, one could have no knowledge of it, and (3) that if nevertheless somebody knew something existed, he could not communicate his knowledge to others.
The Sophists were not only skeptical of what had by then become a philosophical tradition but also of other traditions. On the basis of the observation that different nations have different rules of conduct even in regard to things considered most sacred—such as the relations between the sexes, marriage, and burial—they concluded that most rules of conduct are conventions . What is really important is to be successful in life and to gain influence over others. This they promised to teach. Gorgias was proud of the fact that, having no knowledge of medicine, he was more successful in persuading a patient to undergo a necessary operation than his brother, a physician, who knew when an operation was necessary. The older Sophists, however, were far from openly preaching immoralism. They, nevertheless, gradually came under suspicion because of their sly ways of arguing. One of the later Sophists, Thrasymachus of Chalcedon (flourished 5th century bce ), was bold enough to declare openly that “right is what is beneficial for the stronger or better one”—that is, for the one able to win the power to bend others to his will.
Greek Philosophies of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle Essay
- To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
- As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
- As a template for you assignment
Introduction
The role of ancient Greek philosophers in shaping the entire world philosophical tradition cannot be underestimated. It is argued that the origin of philosophy as a discipline owes its origin to the contribution of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. “Socrates’ contribution to the love of wisdom was manifested by the belief that philosophy was a holy quest- not a game to be taken lightly” (James, 2009).
According to James (2009), “one example of his effect on philosophy is found in the dialog Euthyphro where he suggests that what is to be considered a good act is not good because gods say it is, but is good because it is useful to us in our efforts to be better and happier people.” The premise of this suggestion is that ethics is not about what constitutes the written scriptures, but by taking a keen cognizance on the aspects of life. He advanced that eternal soul contained all knowledge. In this regard, he emphasized one critical aspect of knowledge acquisition by insisting that “we unfortunately lose touch with that knowledge at every birth, and so we need to be reminded of what we already know (rather than learning something new)” (James, 2009). It is his discussions on the love of knowledge that his most prized student – Plato – reconstructed in the Dialogs.
Plato on the other hand placed dialectic, ethics, and physics as the three focal points of philosophy. His contribution to the Greek philosophy can be understood from both idealistic and rationalistic perspectives. Plato advanced the love of knowledge based on two perspectives – ontos which refers to the ultimate and permanent reality. The second reality is the phenomena which refer to a manifestation of the ideal reality and in inferior to the ideal reality. According to Boerce (2000), “Phenomena are illusions which decay and die, Ideals are unchanging, perfect.” Plato’s contribution to Greek philosophy was based on his analysis between ideal and phenomena.
The connection between the two is that “phenomena are available to s through our senses while ideas are available to us through thought” (Boerce, 2000). His contribution to Greek philosophy through Christianity is manifested by his identification in the ideal with God and perfect goodness. Within the same line of argument, Plato apples the same principle to human beings by analyzing the link between the body and the soul. “Soul includes reason, of course, as well as self-awareness and moral sense and the soul will always choose to do good, if it recognizes what is good” (Boerce, 2000).
As a prized student of Plato, Aristotle contributions to Greek philosophy remain fundamental to the advancement of knowledge. Through a combination of science and philosophy, Aristotle was more fascinated with nature. He is the father of modern logic that only differs with today’s logic by its symbolic form. In metaphysics, “while Plato separates the ever-changing phenomenal world from the true and eternal ideal reality, Aristotle suggests that the ideal is found inside the phenomena, the universals inside the particulars” (Boerce, 2000). In Aristotle’s definition, ideal meant essence and its opposite of this is matter. “The four causes that contribute to the movement from formless to complete thing include the material cause, efficient cause, formal cause and final cause” (Boerce, 2000). Socrates, Plato and Aristotle contributions to Greek philosophy remain the most fundamental of all contributions to the love of knowledge.
Boerce, G. (2000). Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. Web.
James, H.H. (2009). The Ethics of the Greek Philosophers, Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. New York: BiblioBazaar, LLC.
- Human Nature and Governance by Thomas Hobbes
- Plato’s Concept of the State: The Philosophy of Justice
- “Euthyphro” Philosophical Book by Plato
- The Lightly Heavy Load: Women in Colonial America
- Piety in Socrates and Euthyphro's Dialogue
- Was Seneca a Tyrant-Trainer?
- Plutarch, One of the Most Influential Ancient Philosophers
- The Philosophers Bergson and Aristophanes
- Herbert Spencer and Emile Durkheim: Comparison
- Friedrich Nietzsche: Values in ‘the Genealogy of Morals’
- Chicago (A-D)
- Chicago (N-B)
IvyPanda. (2021, December 30). Greek Philosophies of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. https://ivypanda.com/essays/greek-philosophies-of-socrates-plato-and-aristotle/
"Greek Philosophies of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle." IvyPanda , 30 Dec. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/greek-philosophies-of-socrates-plato-and-aristotle/.
IvyPanda . (2021) 'Greek Philosophies of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle'. 30 December.
IvyPanda . 2021. "Greek Philosophies of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle." December 30, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/greek-philosophies-of-socrates-plato-and-aristotle/.
1. IvyPanda . "Greek Philosophies of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle." December 30, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/greek-philosophies-of-socrates-plato-and-aristotle/.
Bibliography
IvyPanda . "Greek Philosophies of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle." December 30, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/greek-philosophies-of-socrates-plato-and-aristotle/.
Ask the publishers to restore access to 500,000+ books.
Can You Chip In? (USD)
Internet Archive Audio
- This Just In
- Grateful Dead
- Old Time Radio
- 78 RPMs and Cylinder Recordings
- Audio Books & Poetry
- Computers, Technology and Science
- Music, Arts & Culture
- News & Public Affairs
- Spirituality & Religion
- Radio News Archive
- Flickr Commons
- Occupy Wall Street Flickr
- NASA Images
- Solar System Collection
- Ames Research Center
- All Software
- Old School Emulation
- MS-DOS Games
- Historical Software
- Classic PC Games
- Software Library
- Kodi Archive and Support File
- Vintage Software
- CD-ROM Software
- CD-ROM Software Library
- Software Sites
- Tucows Software Library
- Shareware CD-ROMs
- Software Capsules Compilation
- CD-ROM Images
- ZX Spectrum
- DOOM Level CD
- Smithsonian Libraries
- FEDLINK (US)
- Lincoln Collection
- American Libraries
- Canadian Libraries
- Universal Library
- Project Gutenberg
- Children's Library
- Biodiversity Heritage Library
- Books by Language
- Additional Collections
- Prelinger Archives
- Democracy Now!
- Occupy Wall Street
- TV NSA Clip Library
- Animation & Cartoons
- Arts & Music
- Computers & Technology
- Cultural & Academic Films
- Ephemeral Films
- Sports Videos
- Videogame Videos
- Youth Media
Search the history of over 866 billion web pages on the Internet.
Mobile Apps
- Wayback Machine (iOS)
- Wayback Machine (Android)
Browser Extensions
Archive-it subscription.
- Explore the Collections
- Build Collections
Save Page Now
Capture a web page as it appears now for use as a trusted citation in the future.
Please enter a valid web address
- Donate Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape
Essays in ancient Greek philosophy
Bookreader item preview, share or embed this item, flag this item for.
- Graphic Violence
- Explicit Sexual Content
- Hate Speech
- Misinformation/Disinformation
- Marketing/Phishing/Advertising
- Misleading/Inaccurate/Missing Metadata
plus-circle Add Review comment Reviews
292 Previews
13 Favorites
DOWNLOAD OPTIONS
No suitable files to display here.
PDF access not available for this item.
IN COLLECTIONS
Uploaded by station46.cebu on March 12, 2021
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Greek Philosophy
Ancient Greek Philosophy
The Greeks and the History of Philosophy. The legacy of Greece to Western philosophy is Western philosophy. Here it is not merely a matter, as in science, of the Greeks having set out on certain paths in which modern developments have left their achieve ments far behind. Nor is it just a matter, as in the arts, of the Greeks hav ing produced ...
Greek philosophy
early greek philosophy & other essays
The Philosophy of Ancient Greece Essay. Exclusively available on IvyPanda®. Overall, it is possible to argue that the philosophy of ancient Greece is mostly associated with the names of such prominent thinkers as Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. This paper is aimed at discussing their intellectual achievements in greater detail.
Ancient Greek philosophy
It is argued that the origin of philosophy as a discipline owes its origin to the contribution of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. "Socrates' contribution to the love of wisdom was manifested by the belief that philosophy was a holy quest- not a game to be taken lightly" (James, 2009). Get a custom essay on Greek Philosophies of Socrates ...
LibriVox recording of Early Greek Philosophy and Other Essays by Friedrich Nietzsche. (Translated by Maximilian August Mugge.) Read in English by Jim Locke The essays contained in this volume treat of various subjects. With the exception of perhaps one we must consider all these papers as fragments. Written during the early Seventies, and ...
The Lasting Legacy of Ancient Greek Leaders and ...
IN GREEK PHILOSOPHYConcepts are basic feat. res of rationality. Debates surrounding them have been central to the study of philosophy in the medieval and modern periods, as well as in the analytical and Cont. nental trad-itions. This is a collection of seminal philosophical studies on ancient Greek approaches to the various notions of concept ...
A Guide to Ancient Greek Literature, Language, Script, Imagination and Philosophy. By Frederic Will. This book first published 2020. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data. is book is available from the Brit.
Item Size. 1.5G. 6 volumes ; 24 cm. Papers presented to the Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy since its beginnings in the 1950's. Papers originally presented at the annual meetings of the Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy, 1953-. Vol. 2-5 edited by John P. Anton and Anthony Preus; v. 6 edited by Anthony Preus.
Philosophy: By Movement / School > Ancient > Cynicism. Cynicism is a school of philosophy from the Socratic period of ancient Greece, which holds that the purpose of life is to live a life of Virtue in agreement with Nature (which calls for only the bare necessities required for existence). This means rejecting all conventional desires for health, wealth, power and fame, and living a life free ...
Greek Philosophers
Abstract. The Conclusion argues that the historical importance of Socrates, unquestionable though it is, does not exhaust his significance, even for a secular, non-ideological age. As well as a historical person and a literary persona, Socrates is an exemplary figure, who challenges, encourages, and inspires. The Socratic method of challenging ...
Identity in philosophy', Identity: A Very Short Introduction, Very Short Introductions (Oxford, 2019; online edn, ... One solution is essentialism, a doctrine that once again originates in classical Greek philosophy. To Aristotle, the essence of human beings was rationality, much like the essence of the Grand Shrine is an ideal form associated ...
Students will be sure to build reading comprehension and critical thinking skills with these texts from famous philosophers. " On Reverence for Parents " by Zhao Ban (8th Grade) In this philosophy text written by Chinese Historian Zhao Ban, girls are given guidelines for behaving appropriately for their parents.
The transformative power of ancient Greek philosophical thought has deeply shaped my per- sonal perspectives and the way I navigate the world. Philosophy, deriving from the Greek words 'philo' (love) and 'sophia' (wisdom), encompasses three fundamental domains: metaphysics, epistemology, and ethics.
Mügge, Maximilian A. (Maximilian August), 1878-. Title. Early Greek Philosophy & Other Essays. Collected Works, Volume Two. Alternate Title. Early Greek Philosophy and Other Essays. Contents. Translator's preface -- The Greek State -- The Greek woman -- On music and words -- Homer's contest -- The relation of Schopenhauer's philosophy to a ...
Greek Elegy (1990) [74] 4. Lies, Fiction and Slander in Early Greek Poetry (1993) [85] 5. Greek Table-Talk before Plato (1993) [119] 6. The Theognidea: a Step towards a Collection of Fragments? (1997) [135] 7. Early Greek Iambic Poetry: the Importance of Narrative (2001) [151] 8. Ancestors of Historiography in Early Greek Elegiac and Iambic ...
genres of Greek literature, above all the Greek novel, but also Attic Comedy, h-century historiography, and Hellenistic and Imperial Greek poetry. Many are already essential reading, such as the chap-ter on the gure of Lycidas in eocritus Idyll 7, or two chapters on the ancient readership of Greek novels. Discussions of Imperial Greek