tolerance essay ba part 2

• Study Programs
• Punjab Board 7th
• Punjab Board 8th
• Federal Board 9th
• Punjab Board 9th
• Punjab Board 10th
• BA 3rd year
• BA 4th year
• MDCAT Entry Test
• ECAT Entry Test
• Courses Categories
• Computer & IT
• Personal Development
• Arts & Crafts
• Photography
• Health & Fitness

• Become an Instructor

BA 4th year A Selection of Modern English Essays Ch. 13

13     tolerance 1 lectures - 26:32.

• Essay 13 Tolerance 26:32

BA 4th year A Selection of Modern English Essays

• 1 Pakistan and the Modern World
• 2 The Eclipse
• 3 Whistling of Birds
• 4 Take the Plunge
• 5 Nagasaki August nine, nigh-teen forty five
• 6 Walking on the Moon
• 7 My Grandfather
• 8 My Tailor
• 9 The Beauty Industry
• 10 Are Doctors Men of Science
• 11 Hosts And Guests
• 12 The Bechelor's Dilemma
• 13 Tolerance
• 14 On Saying Please
• 15 To Err is Human
• 17 Science and Values
• 19 From the Policemen and a Moral
• 20 The Vitamins

Login to Instutor

Successfully registerd please check your inbox and verfiy yourself

Forgot Password ?

Not a member yet? Register now — it's fun and easy!

Forgot Password?

Reset password, verification code.

Resend Verification Email/SMS

Register to Instutor

Forgot Password

Already member? Login now — it's fun and easy!

Go To Forgot Password

Did not get password recover email?

Use Forgot Password option again

Post your reviewsss

Give a start rating from 1 to 5 stars. Submit Review

Tolerance By E.M. Forster – Point Summary and Model Question Answers

Table of Contents

Tolerance By E.M. Forster

Edward Morgan (E.M.) Forster (1879-1970) is a well-known twentieth-century novelist and critic. From among his several novels, A Passage to India (1924) has attracted particular attention in this country because of its Indian locale. Aspects of the Novel is a valuable introductory guide to the critical study of the novel.

Please enable JavaScript

Main Points / Summary

This essay was published soon after the end of World War II in 1945. The war had caused great destruction and every nation suffered the consequence. Everybody was talking about reconstruction. Forster felt that nothing enduring could be constructed or reconstructed without a sound state of mind. Diplomacy, economics or trade conferences could not function without fulfilling this basic requirement.

Forster does not agree with those people who believe that love is needed to rebuild civilization. While admitting that love is a great force in private life, Forster puts forward the view that it does not work in public affairs. One can only love what one knows personally, says Forster, and one cannot know much. It is, therefore, absurd to expect nations or business concerns or marketing boards to love one another.

According to Forster, in public affairs, in the rebuilding of civilization, what is needed is not something so dramatic and emotional as love but tolerance. By ‘tolerance’ Forster means to be able to put up with people, to stand things. In the post-war situation, one may not be able to love but one can tolerate. Tolerance is very dull and boring and negative but it is the sound state of mind needed after the war.

Forster admits that tolerance is not as divine a principle as love. But in an overcrowded and overheated world, it is the only workable substitute. One cannot love total strangers. Therefore love generally gives out as soon as one moves away from one’s home and friends. However, tolerance can carry on even when one cannot love.

Question And Answers

The proper spirit cannot be love although most people will say so. Forster explains that love is a great force in private life but it does not work in public affairs. It has been tried again and again. It has always failed. It has failed because we can only love what we know personally. And we cannot know much. He says that tolerance is the quality most needed for building a new world after the war. This is the sound state of mind which will enable different races and classes who may not love each other to settle down to the work of reconstruction.

Ans. Love, according to E.M. Forster, is a great force in private life. It is the greatest of all things. But it does not work in public affairs. It has been tried again and again and it has always failed. He is of the opinion that it is absurd, unreal, even dangerous to suggest that nations, business concerns or marketing boards or people of whom one has never even heard may love one another. It is indulging in vague sentimentalism to expect Germans and the British, who had been fighting during the war, to love each other. But, in the post-war world, they have to live with each other. They must learn to tolerate each other because one cannot exterminate the other. Forster further says that one can only love what one knows personally. The world is full of people. And one cannot know much.

Q.3. What are the two solutions to the problem of living with people one doesn’t like? Is there a third solution? If so, Why doesn’t the author accept it?

Ans. One solution is to segregate people one doesn’t like and to kill them. The other solution is to put up with such people as well as one can. The first is what the Nazis did and the second is the way of the democracies.

Ans. Tolerance is a very dull, boring and negative virtue according to Forster. Yet this is the quality most needed after the war. The post-war world needs negative virtues like not being huffy, touchy, irritable, revengeful. Forster finds positive militant phrases like ‘I will purge this nation’, ‘I will clean up this city,’ terrifying and disgusting. He explains that when there were fewer people in this world, these phrases might not have mattered. However, when one nation is mixed up with another, when one city cannot be organically separated from its neighbours, they have become horrifying. Today, if such militant ideals are sought to be put in practice, there will be tremendous damage both in terms of life and material.

Have something to say Cancel reply

Discover more from smart english notes.

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

• Matric Notes
• Wisdom Words
• BEd MEd Assignments
• TCA Lectures
• Instructions Of

BSc BA ADP BCom Notes

Bsc ba adp english essay tolerance with outline & quotations, bsc ba adp fsc ics fa icom english essay tolerance with outline & quotations essay notes online taleem ilmi hub.

To view Quotations for Essays. Click  Here .

1. Introduction

• Tolerance is the quality of a person
• Intolerance leads to the world's disaster

2. Definition and meaning of Tolerance

• Tolerance means that others believe you to be decent
• Tolerance also means to know the others patiently

3. Vices of intolerance

• Horrible acts of intolerance in the history
• Enemies are the outcome of our intolerance

4. Usefulness of tolerance

• Tolerance is really a highly useful quality
• Tolerance is necessary in a democratic country

5. Conclusion

"Tolerance is giving to every other human being every right that you claim for yourself". (R.G. Ingersoll)

Tolerance, as an act, is the ability of a person to treat others equally and with due respect despite of any factors such as race or social position. Tolerance is the most necessary quality of a man. Tolerance is one of the conditions of good manners. Intolerance leads to the worst disaster. So, we put so much importance on tolerance.

Tolerance means that you start with the assumption that the people being addressed will believe you to be a basically decent and normal person. Similarly, tolerance also means that you start with the assumption that the people you are addressing are basically decent and normal people.

Intolerance leads to the worst kinds of disaster. In the mythology and history we can find many horrible acts of intolerance. Aurangzeb killed Hindus under the feet of elephants, because he could not tolerate Hinduism. Sometimes we quarrel with others owing to such intolerance. Hitler killed a large number of Jews because he could not tolerate them. Many of our enemies are the outcome of our intolerance. We cannot make justice, because we are intolerant to hear the views, which are different for ours. So, intolerance is a very bad quality.

"Compassion and tolerance are not a sign of weakness, but a sign of strength". (Dalai Lama)

Tolerance is really a very useful quality. It is one of the basic principles of good manners. We can do justice if we are tolerant to hear the different views of others. If we are tolerant we can make the due assessment of the views of others. Tolerance as a quality is indispensable in the democratic countries. Tolerance is the first condition for the exercise of all views. We must be tolerant of the views, however, bitter that may be. So, every student, every citizen and every individual should preach the habit of tolerance. 

There is no doubt in it that tolerance is the most necessary quality of our every day life. If we preach tolerance, we will be free from all the pains of envy within ourselves. Then our soul will live in peace and happiness. Children from their early childhood should develop the habit of tolerance. The elders should guide them in this respect.

"Tolerance is the oil, which takes the friction out of life". (Anonymous)

You might like

Post a comment, contact form.

• Colleges and Universties
• Featured Lisitng of College
• College By Cities
• College By Level
• CSS Pakistan
• BS Mathematics
• BS Electrical Engineering
• BS Pschyology
• BS Software Engineering
• BS Computer Engineering
• BS Chemical Engineering
• BS Chemistry
• BS Machenical Engineering
• BS Civial Engineering
• Most Popular Courses
• Inter Level Courses
• Bachelor Level Courses
• Master Level Courses
• Admission Alert
• Admission Andriod App
• 7th Class Lectures
• 8th Class Lectures
• 9th Class Lectures
• 10th Class Lectures
• 11th Class Lectures
• 12th Class Lectures
• ECAT Lectures
• MDCAT Lectures
• BA Part 1 Lectures
• BA Part 2 Lectures
• LAT Lectures
• Matriculation
• Intermediate
• Punjab University
• Karachi University
• Bahaudin Zakriya University
• Sarghoda University
• Peshawar University
• Islamia University Bahawalpur
• Allama Iqbal Open University
• Virtual University
• University Of Health Science
• University Of Balochistan
• AJK University
• Quetta University
• Past Papers Android App
• Roll No Slip
• Study Abroad Main Page
• Study Abroad Consultants
• Study Abroad Guides
• Study Abroad Events
• Scholarships
• Search Jobs by Company
• Search Jobs by Industry
• Search Jobs by City
• Search Jobs in Professions
• BS Electrical Engr
• BS Software Engr
• BS Computer Engr
• BS Chemical Engr
• BS Machenical Engr
• BS Civial Engr
• MS Mathematics
• MS Electrical Engr
• MS Pschyology
• MS Software Engr
• MS Computer Engr
• MS Chemical Engr
• MS Chemistry
• MS Machenical Engr
• MS Civial Engr
• NAT-II Test
• General Knowledge
• GAT General
• GAT Subject
• Books Store

Latest Educational News Stories

Daily update of all national, international news, picture stories, college / university announcements and educational events.

• Featured Listing of Colleges
• Colleges by Cities
• Colleges by Levels

Colleges and Universities Merit Lists

• Find a Course

Pakistan's Largest Database of Colleges and Universities

Explore Largest Directory of Private and Govt. Colleges, Universities and find best institute for your future Education.

BS Programs

• Admissions Alerts
• Admission Guides
• 1st Year Admissions
• Bachelors Admissions
• Masters Admissions
• Admissions Android Apps
• Online Study Android App

Online Test

Short question.

• 9th Class Physics Short Questions
• 9th Class Chemistry Short Questions
• 9th Class Math Short Questions
• 9th Class Biology Short Questions
• 9th Class Computer Short Questions
• 9th Class English Short Questions
• 10th Class Physics Short Question
• 10th Class Chemistry Short Question
• 10th Class Math Short Question
• 10th Class Biology Short Question
• 10th Class Computer Short Question
• 10th Class English Short Question

Past Papers

University past papers, all boards and universities up to date past papers.

Search and download updated past papers of all educational boards and universities in Pakistan

• Date Sheets Android App

Roll Number Slips

• Results Android App
• Prize Bonds
• Prize Bond Schedules

University Results

Exam results 2024.

Check online Results 2024 Matric Inter BA BSc B.Com MA MSc M.Com CSS PCS MCAT ECAT of all educational boards and universities in Pakistan

Study Abroad

• Register as Consultant

Scholarships Main

• Scholarships in UK
• Scholarships in US
• Scholarships in Canada
• Scholarships in France
• Scholarships in Germany

Study Abroad Programs and Opportunities for Pakistani Students

Explore free study abroad search to find programs, consultants, events to study in USA, UK, Australia, China, Malaysia and many others.

• NTS Test Form
• NTS Test Date
• NTS Selected Candidate
• NTS Answer Key
• NTS Test Registration
• NTS Test Prep.
• NTS Rejected Candidate
• NTS Results
• Find Tutors
• Register Tutor

• NTS Preparation
• Home Tutors
• MDCAT preparation
• ECAT Entry Test

BA Part 2 A Selection of Modern English Essays Tolerance Video Lectures in Urdu

• Essay 13 Tolerance
• Class BA 4th year
• A Selection of Modern English Essays

Muhammad Rizwan

I like this method of teaching.

to continue to ilmkidunya.com

Hi SoftSolutions

A vibrant community of 492k followers. Join to get daily updates for exams & study activities.

Join our 2.38 Million subscribers on Pakistan's #1 Educational Youtube Channel to keep learning.

A great way to remain in touch with latest educational news. Become one of our 57.8K followers.

Make your Insta feed full of interesting information & educational content. We currently have 3,551 followers. Follow us on Instagram.

Make your fun time more valuable. Get short informative & educational videos.Become one of our 202.9K followers.

© ilmkidunya.com No content of this website can be copied or reproduced in any form without permission

Forgot Password

Register type.

Please Provide following information to Register

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

SELECTION OF MODERN ESSAYS B.A PART-II NOTES Question And Answers

2019, Saad Mushtaq

Related Papers

Muhammad Burhanuddin Qasmi

The 1857 revolt, which had forged an unshakable unity amongst Hindus and Muslims alike, was an important milestone in our freedom struggle - providing hope and inspiration for future generations of freedom lovers. All Hindus and Muslims were fighting under a single command and control for a single cause – FREEDOM from British tyranny. That shocked the British; they learnt that a unity among Indians would be irresistible in future. Thus, the aftermath of the 1857 brought about dramatic changes in colonial rule as stated earlier. In addition to change of governance from proxy to direct British Rule, the British embarked on a furious policy of "Divide and Rule", fomenting religious hatred as never before. Resorting to rumors and falsehoods, they deliberately recast Indian history in highly communal colors and practised malicious communal politics to divide the Indian masses. Hateful history books portraying successful and pious Mughal rulers like Babar and Aurangzeb were compiled in that period of time. All practicing Muslim rulers were shown as anti-Hindu and repressive against their citizens whereas those fond of Darbaris and lavish were given importance in the pages of Indian history, thus creating communalism and hate among Hindus and Muslims. Shuddhi Karan Movement by Arya Samaj, which later shaped into Bhartiya Hindu Shuddhi Mahasabha' (Indian Hindu Purification Council) in 1923 to work as what today the Sang Privar is doing in the name of Gharwapsi was also among the plots of ‘divide and rule’ conspiracy of British Raj in India. That legacy continues to plague the sub-continent till today. However, if more people become aware of the colonial roots of this divisive communal gulf - it is possible that some of the damage done to Hindu-Muslim unity could be reversed. If Hindus and Muslims could rejoin and collaborate in the spirit of 1857, the sub-continent may yet be able to unshackle itself from it's colonial past – say British and American hegemony this day. Let's have a real recounting of our strength in India— the unity in diversity— and make meaningful salutations to all our heroes alike. Year 1857 was a time for united war against British tyrants and 2016, after 159 years, should bring real smiles to all the brave souls – ulama, Muslims, Hindu and Sikhs who gifted us the 'FREEDOM'.

The Diplomat

Pippa Virdee

Belkacem Belmekki

The emergence of a separatist tendency among the majority of the Muslim community in British India in the wake of the happenings of 1857 has been a bone of contention among scholars concerned with the history of the Indian Subcontinent. In this regard, various theories and explanations have been put forward. While some claim that this separatism was in fact a ploy used by the elite of the Muslim community to safeguard their interests, others consider the fear of the overwhelming Hindu majority as a bona fide factor that triggered alienation with the latter, and still others evoke the many religious cum cultural divergences that exist between the Muslims and Hindus. Nevertheless, the present article seeks to set out another element of equal importance, namely British rule, whose role was to a large extent instrumental in polarizing the Indian society, dividing it into two main separate communities, Muslim and Hindu. Keywords Separatism – British rule – Divide et impera – Hindu majority – Muslim minority It is historically taken for granted that the Great Revolt of 1857 in the Indian Subcontinent delivered a coup de grâce to the Muslim community there, which had already been suffering under the East India Company rule prior to this uprising. This resulted from the decision of the British to make the Muslims bear the brunt of these happenings. In fact, as the fighting ended, the British chose to throw the cover of responsibility exclusively on the Muslims as the only instigators. Whether this decision, that is, of accusing the Muslim community alone, was deliberate on the part of the British government to achieve a certain goal

Felix Verhagen

Postcolonialism assumes that knowledge is not simply a mirror which represents the real, but is rather a potent force that shapes our reality. This assumption informs this thesis by comparing historic books on the decolonization of India from a Hindu, Muslim and Western perspective. The discourse of their works are compared within a deconstructive discourse framework and related to postcolonial theories concerning: Eurocentrism, Orientalism, Occidentalism, Violence and Psychanalysis. The discourse of the authors shows great diversity on the decolonization of India and founding of Pakistan. The authors deviate in their descriptions on the years preceding independence, the transfer of power in 1947 and the consequences of decolonization. The Western authors (Lapierre & Collins, 1975) pay most attention to the year 1947; just before the transfer of power, whereas the Hindu author (Mahajan, 2000) analyzes British-Indian relations pre-1947 and the Muslim author (Abid, 2013) devotes much ...

Nurul Emran

Anil Nauriya

The paper discusses some aspects of the historiography of India's freedom movement in the 20th Century to the extent that these enter into our understanding of contemporary India particularly in respect of issues concerning the Muslims.

published in 'Citizenship: Context and Challenges', edited by Amir Ullah Khan and Riaz F. Shaikh, Centre for Development Policy and Practice, Hyderabad, 2021

Naresh Saxena

Muslims in Independent India have suffered immensely because of strong Hindu bias, which exhibited itself in excessive police violence against them during the riots even during the relatively 'Secular' Congress regimes. Since the 1980s, prejudice and suspicion against Muslims has further deepened due to the appeasement policies of the Congress government, and the role played by Muslim political leaders and clergy in those years. Such policies helped the BJP to exploit Hindu fears for political gains, and after coming to power BJP has openly promoted hatred against Muslims, reducing them almost to the status of second-class citizens. For the BJP Muslims are non-voters, and hence their concerns can not only be ignored but deliberately hitting at their interests occasionally (Art. 370, CAA, triple talaq, anti-conversion laws) is considered electorally rewarding.

Faisal Devji

Islam in India: An Examination of the Post-Partition Treatment of Muslims on the Indian Subcontinent

Robert EDGE-PARTINGTON

The Emergency, which took place during the late 1970s in India, was a crisis period for South Asia, with executive powers being exploited by Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, the granddaughter of the first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru. During this period, forced sterilisations reached their peak, a shocking 8.1 million in 1978, and the sterilisations were met with violent opposition, as a claim was made by Islamic groups that this was a deliberate government attempt to remove Muslims from India. This paper explores the legitimacy of the claim, giving context to the position of Islam in India in the 20th century, and the buildup to one of the most under-reported human rights violations in the post-war world.

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Sultan Khan

Journal of the American Academy of Religion

Zayn Kassam

Shamsul Islam

MUHAMMAD MUMTAZ ALI

Ritu Sharma

Jyotirmaya Sharma

Mihi & Mano Publications

Surendra Govidu

Dr. Mahboob Hussain

Darul Huda Islamic University

Mohamed Thaha

Pakistan Journal of Social Research

Azmatullah Wazir

Gajendra Choudhary

International Journal of Middle East Studies

Nasir Islam

Humanitarian and Social Research Center (INSAMER)

in: Bernt Glatzer (ed), Essays on South Asian Society, Culture and Politics. (Zentrum Moderner Orient/Arbeitshefte; No 9) Berlin: Das Arabische Buch, 49-70.

Dietrich Reetz

Global Foreign Policy Review

Fazal Rehman Kakar

Ahsan Ahmad

Mohammad Sajjad

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Beyond Intractability

The Hyper-Polarization Challenge to the Conflict Resolution Field We invite you to participate in an online exploration of what those with conflict and peacebuilding expertise can do to help defend liberal democracies and encourage them live up to their ideals.

Follow BI and the Hyper-Polarization Discussion on BI's New Substack Newsletter .

Hyper-Polarization, COVID, Racism, and the Constructive Conflict Initiative Read about (and contribute to) the  Constructive Conflict Initiative  and its associated Blog —our effort to assemble what we collectively know about how to move beyond our hyperpolarized politics and start solving society's problems. 

By Sarah Peterson

Originally published in July 2003, Current Implications added by Heidi Burgess in December, 2019

Current Implications

When Sarah wrote this essay in 2003, social media existed, but it hadn't yet become popular or widespread.  Facebook and Twitter hadn't started yet (Facebook started in 2004, Twitter in 2006.)  More .... 

What is Tolerance?

Tolerance is the appreciation of diversity and the ability to live and let others live. It is the ability to exercise a fair and objective attitude towards those whose opinions, practices, religion, nationality, and so on differ from one's own.[1] As William Ury notes, "tolerance is not just agreeing with one another or remaining indifferent in the face of injustice, but rather showing respect for the essential humanity in every person."[2]

Intolerance is the failure to appreciate and respect the practices, opinions and beliefs of another group. For instance, there is a high degree of intolerance between Israeli Jews and Palestinians who are at odds over issues of identity , security , self-determination , statehood, the right of return for refugees, the status of Jerusalem and many other issues. The result is continuing intergroup conflict and violence .

Why Does Tolerance Matter?

At a post-9/11 conference on multiculturalism in the United States, participants asked, "How can we be tolerant of those who are intolerant of us?"[3] For many, tolerating intolerance is neither acceptable nor possible.

Though tolerance may seem an impossible exercise in certain situations -- as illustrated by Hobbes in the inset box on the right -- being tolerant, nonetheless, remains key to easing hostile tensions between groups and to helping communities move past intractable conflict. That is because tolerance is integral to different groups relating to one another in a respectful and understanding way. In cases where communities have been deeply entrenched in violent conflict, being tolerant helps the affected groups endure the pain of the past and resolve their differences. In Rwanda, the Hutus and the Tutsis have tolerated a reconciliation process , which has helped them to work through their anger and resentment towards one another.

The Origins of Intolerance

In situations where conditions are economically depressed and politically charged, groups and individuals may find it hard to tolerate those that are different from them or have caused them harm. In such cases, discrimination, dehumanization, repression, and violence may occur. This can be seen in the context of Kosovo, where Kosovar Alabanians, grappling with poverty and unemployment, needed a scapegoat, and supported an aggressive Serbian attack against neighboring Bosnian Muslim and Croatian neighbors.

The Consequences of Intolerance

Intolerance will drive groups apart, creating a sense of permanent separation between them. For example, though the laws of apartheid in South Africa were abolished nine years ago, there still exists a noticeable level of personal separation between black and white South Africans, as evidenced in studies on the levels of perceived social distance between the two groups.[4] This continued racial division perpetuates the problems of intergroup resentment and hostility.

How is Intolerance Perpetuated?

Between Individuals: In the absence of their own experiences, individuals base their impressions and opinions of one another on assumptions. These assumptions can be influenced by the positive or negative beliefs of those who are either closest or most influential in their lives, including parents or other family members, colleagues, educators, and/or role models. 

In the Media: Individual attitudes are influenced by the images of other groups in the media, and the press. For instance, many Serbian communities believed that the western media portrayed a negative image of the Serbian people during the NATO bombing in Kosovo and Serbia.[5] This de-humanization may have contributed to the West's willingness to bomb Serbia. However, there are studies that suggest media images may not influence individuals in all cases. For example, a study conducted on stereotypes discovered people of specific towns in southeastern Australia did not agree with the negative stereotypes of Muslims presented in the media.[6]

In Education: There exists school curriculum and educational literature that provide biased and/or negative historical accounts of world cultures. Education or schooling based on myths can demonize and dehumanize other cultures rather than promote cultural understanding and a tolerance for diversity and differences.

What Can Be Done to Deal with Intolerance?

To encourage tolerance, parties to a conflict and third parties must remind themselves and others that tolerating tolerance is preferable to tolerating intolerance. Following are some useful strategies that may be used as tools to promote tolerance.

Intergroup Contact: There is evidence that casual intergroup contact does not necessarily reduce intergroup tensions, and may in fact exacerbate existing animosities. However, through intimate intergroup contact, groups will base their opinions of one another on personal experiences, which can reduce prejudices . Intimate intergroup contact should be sustained over a week or longer in order for it to be effective.[7]

In Dialogue: To enhance communication between both sides, dialogue mechanisms such as dialogue groups or problem solving workshops  provide opportunities for both sides to express their needs and interests. In such cases, actors engaged in the workshops or similar forums feel their concerns have been heard and recognized. Restorative justice programs such as victim-offender mediation provide this kind of opportunity as well. For instance, through victim-offender mediation, victims can ask for an apology from the offender and the offender can make restitution and ask for forgiveness.[8]

What Individuals Can Do

Individuals should continually focus on being tolerant of others in their daily lives. This involves consciously challenging the stereotypes and assumptions that they typically encounter in making decisions about others and/or working with others either in a social or a professional environment.

What the Media Can Do

The media should use positive images to promote understanding and cultural sensitivity. The more groups and individuals are exposed to positive media messages about other cultures, the less they are likely to find faults with one another -- particularly those communities who have little access to the outside world and are susceptible to what the media tells them. See the section on stereotypes  to learn more about how the media perpetuate negative images of different groups.

What the Educational System Can Do

Educators are instrumental in promoting tolerance and peaceful coexistence . For instance, schools that create a tolerant environment help young people respect and understand different cultures. In Israel, an Arab and Israeli community called Neve Shalom or Wahat Al-Salam ("Oasis of Peace") created a school designed to support inter-cultural understanding by providing children between the first and sixth grades the opportunity to learn and grow together in a tolerant environment.[9]

What Other Third Parties Can Do

Conflict transformation NGOs (non-governmental organizations) and other actors in the field of peacebuilding can offer mechanisms such as trainings to help parties to a conflict communicate better with one another. For instance, several organizations have launched a series of projects in Macedonia that aim to reduce tensions between the country's Albanian, Romani and Macedonian populations, including activities that promote democracy, ethnic tolerance, and respect for human rights.[10]

International organizations need to find ways to enshrine the principles of tolerance in policy. For instance, the United Nations has already created The Declaration of Moral Principles on Tolerance, adopted and signed in Paris by UNESCO's 185 member states on Nov. 16, 1995, which qualifies tolerance as a moral, political, and legal requirement for individuals, groups, and states.[11]

Governments also should aim to institutionalize policies of tolerance. For example, in South Africa, the Education Ministry has advocated the integration of a public school tolerance curriculum into the classroom; the curriculum promotes a holistic approach to learning . The United States government has recognized one week a year as international education week, encouraging schools, organizations, institutions, and individuals to engage in projects and exchanges to heighten global awareness of cultural differences.

The Diaspora community can also play an important role in promoting and sustaining tolerance. They can provide resources to ease tensions and affect institutional policies in a positive way. For example, Jewish, Irish, and Islamic communities have contributed to the peacebuilding effort within their places of origin from their places of residence in the United States. [12]

When Sarah wrote this essay in 2003, social media existed, but it hadn't yet become popular or widespread.  Facebook and Twitter hadn't started yet (Facebook started in 2004, Twitter in 2006.) 

In addition, while the conflict between the right and the left and the different races certainly existed in the United States, it was not nearly as escalated or polarized as it is now in 2019.  For those reasons (and others), the original version of this essay didn't discuss political or racial tolerance or intolerance in the United States.  Rather than re-writing the original essay, all of which is still valid, I have chosen to update it with these "Current Implications." 

In 2019, the intolerance between the Left and the Right in the United States has gotten extreme. Neither side is willing to accept the legitimacy of the values, beliefs, or actions of the other side, and they are not willing to tolerate those values, beliefs or actions whatsoever. That means, in essence, that they will not tolerate the people who hold those views, and are doing everything they can to disempower, delegitimize, and in some cases, dehumanize the other side.

Further, while intolerance is not new, efforts to spread and strengthen it have been greatly enhanced with the current day traditional media and social media environments: the proliferation of cable channels that allow narrowcasting to particular audiences, and Facebook and Twitter (among many others) that serve people only information that corresponds to (or even strengthens) their already biased views. The availability of such information channels both helps spread intolerance; it also makes the effects of that intolerance more harmful.

Intolerance and its correlaries (disempowerment, delegitimization, and dehumanization) are perhaps clearest on the right, as the right currently holds the U.S. presidency and controls the statehouses in many states.  This gives them more power to assert their views and disempower, delegitimize and dehumanize the other.  (Consider the growing restrictions on minority voting rights, the delegitimization of transgendered people and supporters, and the dehumanizing treatment of would-be immigrants at the southern border.) 

But the left is doing the same thing when it can.  By accusing the right of being "haters," the left delegitimizes the right's values and beliefs, many of which are not borne of animus, but rather a combination of bad information being spewed by fake news in social and regular media, and natural neurobiological tendencies which cause half of the population to be biologically more fearful, more reluctant to change, and more accepting of (and needing) a strong leader. 

Put together, such attitudes feed upon one another, causing an apparently never-ending escalation and polarization spiral of intolerance.  Efforts to build understanding and tolerance, just as described in the original article, are still much needed today both in the United States and across the world. 

The good news is that many such efforts exist.  The Bridge Alliance , for instance, is an organization of almost 100 member organizations which are working to bridge the right-left divide in the U.S.  While the Bridge Alliance doesn't use the term "tolerance" or "coexistence" in its framing " Four Principles ," they do call for U.S. leaders and the population to "work together" to meet our challenges.  "Working together" requires not only "tolerance for " and "coexistence with" the other side; it also requires respect for other people's views. That is something that many of the member organizations are trying to establish with red-blue dialogues, public fora, and other bridge-building activities.  We need much, much more of that now in 2019 if we are to be able to strengthen tolerance against the current intolerance onslaught.

One other thing we'd like to mention that was touched upon in the original article, but not explored much, is what can and should be done when the views or actions taken by the other side are so abhorent that they cannot and should not be tolerated? A subset of that question is one Sarah did pose above '"How can we be tolerant of those who are intolerant of us?"[3] For many, tolerating intolerance is neither acceptable nor possible." Sarah answers that by arguing that tolerance is beneficial--by implication, even in those situations. 

What she doesn't explicitly consider, however, is the context of the intolerance.  If one is considering the beliefs or behavior of another that doesn't affect anyone else--a personal decision to live in a particular way (such as following a particular religion for example), we would agree that tolerance is almost always beneficial, as it is more likely to lead to interpersonal trust and further understanding. 

However, if one is considering beliefs or actions of another that does affect other people--particularly actions that affect large numbers of people, then that is a different situation.  We do not tolerate policies that allow the widespread dissemination of fake news and allow foreign governments to manipulate our minds such that they can manipulate our elections.  That, in our minds is intolerable.  So too are actions that destroy the rule of law in this country; actions that threaten our democratic system.

But that doesn't mean that we should respond to intolerance in kind.  Rather, we would argue, one should respond to intolerance with respectful dissent--explaining why the intolerance is unfairly stereotyping an entire group of people; explaining why such stereotyping is both untrue and harmful; why a particular action is unacceptable because it threatens the integrity of our democratic system, explaining alternative ways of getting one's needs met. 

This can be done without attacking the people who are guilty of intolerance with direct personal attacks--calling them "haters," or shaming them for having voted a particular way.  That just hardens the other sides' intolerance. 

Still, reason-based arguments probably won't be accepted right away.  Much neuroscience research explains that emotions trump facts and that people won't change their minds when presented with alternative facts--they will just reject those facts.  But if people are presented with facts in the form of respectful discussion instead of personal attacks, that is both a factual and an emotional approach that can help de-escalate tensions and eventually allow for the development of tolerance.  Personal attacks on the intolerant will not do that.  So when Sarah asked whether one should tolerate intolerance, I would say "no, one should not." But that doesn't mean that you have to treat the intolerant person disrespectfully or "intolerantly."  Rather, model good, respectful behavior.  Model the behavior you would like them to adopt.  And use that to try to fight the intolerance, rather than simply "tolerating it." 

-- Heidi and Guy Burgess. December, 2019.

Back to Essay Top

---------------------------------------------------------

[1] The American Heritage Dictionary (New York: Dell Publishing, 1994).

[2] William Ury, Getting To Peace (New York: The Penguin Group, 1999), 127.

[3] As identified by Serge Schmemann, a New York Times columnist noted in his piece of Dec. 29, 2002, in The New York Times entitled "The Burden of Tolerance in a World of Division" that tolerance is a burden rather than a blessing in today's society.

[4] Jannie Malan, "From Exclusive Aversion to Inclusive Coexistence," Short Paper, African Centre for the Constructive Resolution of Disputes (ACCORD), Conference on Coexistence Community Consultations, Durban, South Africa, January 2003, 6.

[5] As noted by Susan Sachs, a New York Times columnist in her piece of Dec. 16, 2001, in The New York Times entitled "In One Muslim Land, an Effort to Enforce Lessons of Tolerance."

[6] Amber Hague, "Attitudes of high school students and teachers towards Muslims and Islam in a southeaster Australian community," Intercultural Education 2 (2001): 185-196.

[7] Yehuda Amir, "Contact Hypothesis in Ethnic Relations," in Weiner, Eugene, eds. The Handbook of Interethnic Coexistence (New York: The Continuing Publishing Company, 2000), 162-181.

[8] The Ukrainian Centre for Common Ground has launched a successful restorative justice project. Information available on-line at www.sfcg.org .

[9] Neve Shalom homepage [on-line]; available at www.nswas.com ; Internet.

[10] Lessons in Tolerance after Conflict.  http://www.beyondintractability.org/library/external-resource?biblio=9997

[11] "A Global Quest for Tolerance" [article on-line] (UNESCO, 1995, accessed 11 February 2003); available at http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/themes/fight-against-discrimination/promoting-tolerance/ ; Internet.

[12] Louis Kriesberg, "Coexistence and the Reconciliation of Communal Conflicts." In Weiner, Eugene, eds. The Handbook of Interethnic Coexistence (New York: The Continuing Publishing Company, 2000), 182-198.

Use the following to cite this article: Peterson, Sarah. "Tolerance." Beyond Intractability . Eds. Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess. Conflict Information Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder. Posted: July 2003 < http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/tolerance >.

Additional Resources

The intractable conflict challenge.

Our inability to constructively handle intractable conflict is the most serious, and the most neglected, problem facing humanity. Solving today's tough problems depends upon finding better ways of dealing with these conflicts.   More...

Selected Recent BI Posts Including Hyper-Polarization Posts

• Massively Parallel Peace and Democracy Building Links for the Week of August 4, 2024 -- Reader-suggested links, colleague activities, and news and opinion articles that caught our attention this week.
• Thinking about What Democracy's Winners and Losers Owe One Another -- As we think about how to heal US democracy following the upcoming, and undoubtedly divisive election, we propose asking ourselves whether we are willing to treat the other side as we would like to be treated.
• Daniel Stid: A Big Question I Have Is... -- Hope, vision, and place-based civic heath are key elements to our ability to navigate the turbulent times that have left so many of us in fear and despair.

Get the Newsletter Check Out Our Quick Start Guide

Educators Consider a low-cost BI-based custom text .

Constructive Conflict Initiative

Join Us in calling for a dramatic expansion of efforts to limit the destructiveness of intractable conflict.

Things You Can Do to Help Ideas

Practical things we can all do to limit the destructive conflicts threatening our future.

Conflict Frontiers

A free, open, online seminar exploring new approaches for addressing difficult and intractable conflicts. Major topic areas include:

Scale, Complexity, & Intractability

Massively Parallel Peacebuilding

Authoritarian Populism

Constructive Confrontation

Conflict Fundamentals

An look at to the fundamental building blocks of the peace and conflict field covering both “tractable” and intractable conflict.

Beyond Intractability / CRInfo Knowledge Base

Home / Browse | Essays | Search | About

BI in Context

Links to thought-provoking articles exploring the larger, societal dimension of intractability.

Colleague Activities

Information about interesting conflict and peacebuilding efforts.

Disclaimer: All opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Beyond Intractability or the Conflict Information Consortium.

Beyond Intractability 

Unless otherwise noted on individual pages, all content is... Copyright © 2003-2022 The Beyond Intractability Project c/o the Conflict Information Consortium All rights reserved. Content may not be reproduced without prior written permission.

Guidelines for Using Beyond Intractability resources.

Citing Beyond Intractability resources.

Photo Credits for Homepage, Sidebars, and Landing Pages

Contact Beyond Intractability    Privacy Policy The Beyond Intractability Knowledge Base Project  Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess , Co-Directors and Editors  c/o  Conflict Information Consortium Mailing Address: Beyond Intractability, #1188, 1601 29th St. Suite 1292, Boulder CO 80301, USA Contact Form

Powered by  Drupal

production_1

• Privacy Policy

B.A English Short Stories Notes PDF

• B.A All subjects guess paper Part 1
• BA all subjects guess papers part 2

B.A English short stories notes

1. the killers.

• Questions Answers
• Short questions answers

2.  Rappaccini's Daughter

2. the new constitution, 3. breakfast, 4. take pity, 5. the happy prince, 7. the tell-tale heart, 8. the necklace.

• B.A English Poetry Notes
• The old man and the Sea notes
• English short stories notes for B.A
• English Modern essays notes for B.A
• All English notes for B.A

No comments:

Post a Comment

Trending Topics

Latest posts.

• 2nd Year English Complete Notes in PDF
• Class 11 Total marks | FA, FSC, ICS, I.com
• 2nd Year Part II Book II Questions Notes free PDF Download
• Islamiat lazmi complete notes for 10th class pdf download
• The Dying Sun - Summary and Question answers
• 2nd year all subjects notes PDF Download
• 1st year English complete notes pdf download
• FBISE SSC total marks and syllabus 2023
• ICS all Subjects names list of books
• 10th class all subjects notes PDF download
• BISE Hyderabad
• BISE Lahore
• bise rawalpindi
• BISE Sargodha
• career-counseling
• how to pass
• Punjab Board
• Sindh-Board
• Solved mcqs
• Student-Guide