difference between an article and research paper

Research Article vs. Research Paper

What's the difference.

A research article and a research paper are both scholarly documents that present the findings of a research study. However, there are some differences between the two. A research article is typically a shorter document that is published in a peer-reviewed journal. It focuses on a specific research question and provides a concise summary of the study's methodology, results, and conclusions. On the other hand, a research paper is usually a longer document that provides a more comprehensive analysis of a research topic. It often includes a literature review, detailed methodology, extensive data analysis, and a discussion of the implications of the findings. While both types of documents contribute to the scientific knowledge base, research papers tend to be more in-depth and provide a more thorough exploration of the research topic.

Further Detail

Introduction.

Research articles and research papers are both essential components of academic and scientific discourse. They serve as vehicles for sharing knowledge, presenting findings, and contributing to the advancement of various fields of study. While the terms "research article" and "research paper" are often used interchangeably, there are subtle differences in their attributes and purposes. In this article, we will explore and compare the key characteristics of research articles and research papers.

Definition and Purpose

A research article is a concise and focused piece of scholarly writing that typically appears in academic journals. It presents original research, experiments, or studies conducted by the author(s) and aims to communicate the findings to the scientific community. Research articles often follow a specific structure, including an abstract, introduction, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion.

On the other hand, a research paper is a broader term that encompasses various types of academic writing, including research articles. While research papers can also be published in journals, they can take other forms such as conference papers, dissertations, or theses. Research papers provide a more comprehensive exploration of a particular topic, often including a literature review, theoretical framework, and in-depth analysis of the research question.

Length and Depth

Research articles are typically shorter in length compared to research papers. They are usually limited to a specific word count, often ranging from 3000 to 8000 words, depending on the journal's guidelines. Due to their concise nature, research articles focus on presenting the core findings and their implications without delving extensively into background information or theoretical frameworks.

On the other hand, research papers tend to be longer and more comprehensive. They can range from 5000 to 20,000 words or more, depending on the scope of the research and the requirements of the academic institution or conference. Research papers provide a deeper analysis of the topic, including an extensive literature review, theoretical framework, and detailed methodology section.

Structure and Organization

Research articles follow a standardized structure to ensure clarity and consistency across different publications. They typically begin with an abstract, which provides a concise summary of the research question, methodology, results, and conclusions. The introduction section provides background information, states the research problem, and outlines the objectives of the study. The methodology section describes the research design, data collection methods, and statistical analysis techniques used. The results section presents the findings, often accompanied by tables, figures, or graphs. The discussion section interprets the results, compares them with previous studies, and discusses their implications. Finally, the conclusion summarizes the main findings and suggests future research directions.

Research papers, on the other hand, have a more flexible structure depending on the specific requirements of the academic institution or conference. While they may include similar sections as research articles, such as an abstract, introduction, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion, research papers can also incorporate additional sections such as a literature review, theoretical framework, or appendices. The structure of a research paper is often determined by the depth and complexity of the research conducted.

Publication and Audience

Research articles are primarily published in academic journals, which serve as platforms for disseminating new knowledge within specific disciplines. These journals often have a rigorous peer-review process, where experts in the field evaluate the quality and validity of the research before publication. Research articles are targeted towards a specialized audience of researchers, scholars, and professionals in the respective field.

Research papers, on the other hand, can be published in various formats and venues. They can be presented at conferences, published as chapters in books, or submitted as dissertations or theses. While research papers can also undergo peer-review, they may have a broader audience, including researchers, students, and professionals interested in the topic. The publication of research papers allows for a wider dissemination of knowledge beyond the confines of academic journals.

In conclusion, research articles and research papers are both vital components of academic and scientific discourse. While research articles are concise and focused pieces of scholarly writing that present original research findings, research papers provide a more comprehensive exploration of a particular topic. Research articles follow a standardized structure and are primarily published in academic journals, targeting a specialized audience. On the other hand, research papers have a more flexible structure and can be published in various formats, allowing for a wider dissemination of knowledge. Understanding the attributes and purposes of research articles and research papers is crucial for researchers, scholars, and students alike, as it enables effective communication and contributes to the advancement of knowledge in various fields.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.

Stack Exchange Network

Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow , the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

Q&A for work

Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.

Difference between Paper and Article for scientific writings

As I know, in most of situations (in scientific context) these two terms are used to point to same thing and even they are used interchangeably.

For example,

Theory of value with public goods: A survey article

A survey paper on cloud computing

Are there any major differences between them? and can we use them interchangeably in any context?

• differences

• 1 See also: article vs paper –  Martin Thoma Commented Nov 24, 2019 at 11:46

3 Answers 3

The following extract helps understand the difference between a research article and a research paper :

Research paper and research articles are pieces of writing that require critical analysis, inquiry, insight, and demonstration of some special skills from students and scientists. It is really overwhelming for students when their teachers ask them to write a research paper as a form of assignment. Students remain confused between a research paper and a research article because of their similarities. This article attempts to find out if the two terms are synonymous or there is any difference between the two.

Research Article

What do you do when you are a scientist or a scholar and have arrived at a solution to a problem or have made a discovery that you want to share with the world? Well, one of the best ways to let the world know about your piece of wisdom or knowledge is through a research article. This is a piece of writing that contains an original research idea with the relevant data and findings Research article is published in renowned scientific journals that are involved with works in the area to which the paper pertains. A research article is a paper or writing that informs people of a path breaking research or a finding with clinical data to support the finding.

Research Paper

Research is an activity that is given much importance in academics, and this is why assignments requiring research and technical writing start early in the school. Students are asked to submit a research paper as early as in High School, and they become used to the concept when they are pursuing higher studies in colleges. However, a research paper is not just these assignment papers written by students as those written by scholars and scientists and published in journals are also referred to as research papers.

• What is the difference between Research Article and Research Paper?

• There is no difference as such between a research article and a research paper and both involve original research with findings. • There is a trend to refer to term papers and academic papers written by students in colleges as research papers whereas articles submitted by scholars and scientists with their groundbreaking research are termed as research articles. • Research articles are published in renowned scientific journals whereas papers written by students do not go to journals.

(www.differencebetween.com)

There is no definitive distinction between papers and articles that can be applied to all scientific disciplines. Usage varies between disciplines. and within disciplines it can vary depending on context.

Both the examples quoted refer to ‘writings’ that are surveys (in other areas often termed reviews) — one in the field of a social science (economics) and the other in a numerical science (computing). However the term science is also (and perhaps more) associated with the experimental sciences (physics, chemistry and biology), where the types of ‘writings’ are different and where different words are used to distinguish them.

Articles and papers in the Experimental Sciences

Let me illustrate this for the Biomolecular Sciences (biochemistry, molecular biology, molecular genetics and the like). As a practitioner in this area, when I hear these terms, e.g. talking to colleagues, I understand:

Paper : A report of a piece of experimental research work in which the original data presented by the authors was central to interpretation and conclusions regarding advancement of knowledge and understanding of the field. Article : A review or commentary in which the author was discussing the previously published work of others (perhaps including his own) in attempting to provide a perspective of the field or to present a new theory/model/interpretation by integrating such work.

However, despite this professional conversational use of the terms, if I go to any specific journal — here the US heavyweight, Journal of Biological Chemistry (JBC) — I would find a somewhat different usage:

JBC publishes several types of articles but only two of those can be submitted as an unsolicited manuscript: regular papers and accelerated communications.

Thus, JBC regards all the ‘writings’ it publishes as ‘articles’, in common with other journals such as The Journal of Biophysics , and this is consistent with general non-scientific usage — “I read an article in the Financial Times yesterday…”

The way JBC uses ‘regular paper’, is consistent with my specialist conversational definition (above), and although it doesn’t actually say what types of ‘article’ are unsolicited, but if you look at a table of contents of the journal , you would conclude that for this journal it is ‘minireviews’ and historical appraisals of the work of individual scientists.

The Journal of Biophysics only uses the term ‘paper’ in describing only one of its categories of ‘article’:

Comments to the Editor | Short commentaries on a paper published earlier in BJ.

Again using ‘paper’ rather in the sense I defined above.

To conclude, in the extended sense used by peer-reviewed journals in the experimental sciences, all published ‘papers’ can be referred to as articles, but not all articles would be referred to as ‘papers’. (One wouldn’t use ‘paper’ for an editorial, a news item and generally not for a review.) This is exactly the opposite conclusion reached by @1006a from his reading of the OED.

Conflict with the OED and non-experimental sciences

How can one resolve the conflict with the OED, mentioned above? I think the OED describes more traditional usage in the non-experimental sciences and the arts. It is pertinent, in this respect, to consider the phrase “reading a paper” .

As far as my area of science goes, this is just a rather outdated term for presenting one’s results orally at a conference. The talk in itself is transitory, the abstract unreviewed, and the information conveyed will most probably be published elsewhere.

However for colleagues in computing science the talk is likely to be based on a ‘paper’ that has been submitted to the conference organisers, selected after peer-review, and will be published as conference proceedings or in a journal associated with the conference. This is more in line with traditional non-scientific academic presentations, although in this case the ‘paper’ might never have been published.

The difference would seem to derive in part from whether the field of science is one in which original work is in the form of ideas or in the form of measurements and their interpretation.

The distinction I would make is that an article is formally published, generally in some kind of periodical. The relevant definition, from Oxford Dictionaries:

A piece of writing included with others in a newspaper, magazine, or other publication.

Scholarly/scientific/research articles are thus "pieces of writing included with others in" an appropriate publication, most often an academic journal (see Wikipedia).

A paper , on the other hand, may or may not be published anywhere; and if it is published, may be in some alternate venue like conference proceedings (though it can be published in a scholarly journal). Again from Oxford:

An essay or dissertation, especially one read at an academic lecture or seminar or published in an academic journal.

So you can generally call any scientific (research) article a paper, but not all papers are articles.

Edited to clarify the last sentence, to which I also added the parenthetical (research):

Of course, not all articles are scientific (or research ) articles; that distinction generally means that the article presents original research, and as I am using it, that it has met certain standards of whichever field it represents (usually some form of peer review) so that it can be published in a scientific/scholarly journal. A scientific (research) paper meets the first of these criteria, but not necessarily the second (it presents original research, but may or may not be published). There are other kinds of articles/papers, which would ordinarily get a different modifier, like review or meta-review (or newspaper/magazine etc. for articles), or might commonly go by other terms altogether, like essay .

By this definition, not all articles are papers, and not all papers are articles, but all scientific (research) articles are also scientific (research) papers.

• Just to mention that in my consideration of experimental sciences I present the opposite conclusion from that you draw from the OED. Please don't think I am saying you are wrong, but as I explain, that your assertions only hold for certain areas of science. –  David Commented Jul 15, 2017 at 22:27
• @David The key distinction I make is that articles are published . That would, indeed, include things like (literature) review articles, commentary, and possibly book reviews. It does not exclude original research in any field of which I am aware (which includes "experimental science"). It is certainly possible that certain disciplines or specific journals have non-standard usages, but I don't believe it breaks down along "experimental" and "non-experimental" lines. –  1006a Commented Jul 16, 2017 at 16:38
• I agree about there being a difference in relation to publication. The whole background of "reading a paper" implies it can exist without being published, and even in the experimental sciences one might say "I wrote a paper about 'whatever' and sent it to such-and-such a Journal, but they rejected it because the referees were too stupid to understand it". You might feasibly say that about an article (I once had a solicited mini-review rejected because it was thought to be in bad taste) but it would be unusual. But a very popular program for storing PDFs of publications is called... "Papers". –  David Commented Jul 16, 2017 at 16:53

Your Answer

Sign up or log in, post as a guest.

Required, but never shown

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy .

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged meaning differences science or ask your own question .

• Featured on Meta
• Introducing an accessibility dashboard and some upcoming changes to display...
• We've made changes to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy - July 2024
• Announcing a change to the data-dump process

Hot Network Questions

• Is Marisa Tomei in the film the Toxic Avenger?
• Do the merits of an exegesis relying on texts unavailable to the author depend upon whether the unavailable texts were invented or not-yet-existent?
• Automatically closing a water valve after a few minutes
• Statistically, which is more of a severe penalty on a d20 roll, Disadvantage or a -10 penalty?
• Interview disaster
• How to open a single app in a particular language while the system language is English?
• Conservation of energy in a mechanical system with a discontinuous potential function
• Simulation Lorenz83 Attractor
• If it's true that a reservation fee for a cruise ship is non-refundable, then what happens if somebody cancels?
• Inverse relationship between Stirling numbers of the first and second kind via generating functions
• Why do we sometimes use the concept of limits but sometimes don't forget similar kind of problems?
• How do I resolve license terms conflict when forking?
• MPs assuming office on the day of the election
• Can a Hall sensor be tested with just basic test gear?
• It was all he could do not to smoke
• How to use Mathematica to plot following helix solid geometry?
• Normal text and cases
• Is there mutable aliasing in this list of variable references?
• Emphasizing the decreasing condition in the Integral Test or in the AST (in Calculus II): is it worth the time?
• Why did Rio Morales say, "De-escalated that one"?
• Delexing a finitely complete category
• "Seagulls are gulling away."
• In relation to the Tandy TRS-80 Model 1 and Model III, what are "ISAM" and "PDS"?
• Strategies for handling Maternity leave the last two weeks of the semester

Maxwell Library | Bridgewater State University

Today's Hours: 

• Maxwell Library
• Scholarly Journals and Popular Magazines
• Differences in Research, Review, and Opinion Articles

Scholarly Journals and Popular Magazines: Differences in Research, Review, and Opinion Articles

• Where Do I Start?
• How Do I Find Peer-Reviewed Articles?
• How Do I Compare Periodical Types?
• Where Can I find More Information?

Research Articles, Reviews, and Opinion Pieces

Scholarly or research articles are written for experts in their fields. They are often peer-reviewed or reviewed by other experts in the field prior to publication. They often have terminology or jargon that is field specific. They are generally lengthy articles. Social science and science scholarly articles have similar structures as do arts and humanities scholarly articles. Not all items in a scholarly journal are peer reviewed. For example, an editorial opinion items can be published in a scholarly journal but the article itself is not scholarly. Scholarly journals may include book reviews or other content that have not been peer reviewed.

Empirical Study: (Original or Primary) based on observation, experimentation, or study. Clinical trials, clinical case studies, and most meta-analyses are empirical studies.

Review Article: (Secondary Sources) Article that summarizes the research in a particular subject, area, or topic. They often include a summary, an literature reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.

Clinical case study (Primary or Original sources): These articles provide real cases from medical or clinical practice. They often include symptoms and diagnosis.

Clinical trials ( Health Research): Th ese articles are often based on large groups of people. They often include methods and control studies. They tend to be lengthy articles.

Opinion Piece:  An opinion piece often includes personal thoughts, beliefs, or feelings or a judgement or conclusion based on facts. The goal may be to persuade or influence the reader that their position on this topic is the best.

Book review: Recent review of books in the field. They may be several pages but tend to be fairly short. 

Social Science and Science Research Articles

The majority of social science and physical science articles include

• Journal Title and Author
• Abstract 
• Introduction with a hypothesis or thesis
• Literature Review
• Methods/Methodology
• Results/Findings

Arts and Humanities Research Articles

In the Arts and Humanities, scholarly articles tend to be less formatted than in the social sciences and sciences. In the humanities, scholars are not conducting the same kinds of research experiments, but they are still using evidence to draw logical conclusions.  Common sections of these articles include:

• an Introduction
• Discussion/Conclusion
• works cited/References/Bibliography

Research versus Review Articles

• 6 Article types that journals publish: A guide for early career researchers
• INFOGRAPHIC: 5 Differences between a research paper and a review paper
• Michigan State University. Empirical vs Review Articles
• UC Merced Library. Empirical & Review Articles
• << Previous: Where Do I Start?
• Next: How Do I Find Peer-Reviewed Articles? >>
• Last Updated: Jan 24, 2024 10:48 AM
• URL: https://library.bridgew.edu/scholarly

Phone: 508.531.1392 Text: 508.425.4096 Email: [email protected]

Feedback/Comments

Privacy Policy

Website Accessibility

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter

• Richard G. Trefry Library

Q. What's the difference between a research article (or research study) and a review article?

• Course-Specific
• Textbooks & Course Materials
• Tutoring & Classroom Help
• Writing & Citing
• 44 Articles & Journals
• 5 Artificial Intelligence
• 11 Capstone/Thesis/Dissertation Research
• 37 Databases
• 56 Information Literacy
• 9 Interlibrary Loan
• 9 Need help getting started?
• 22 Technical Help

Answered By: Priscilla Coulter Last Updated: Jul 26, 2024     Views: 233482

A research paper is a primary source ...that is, it reports the methods and results of an original study performed by the authors . The kind of study may vary (it could have been an experiment, survey, interview, etc.), but in all cases, raw data have been collected and analyzed by the authors , and conclusions drawn from the results of that analysis.

Research papers follow a particular format.  Look for:

• A brief introduction will often include a review of the existing literature on the topic studied, and explain the rationale of the author's study.  This is important because it demonstrates that the authors are aware of existing studies, and are planning to contribute to this existing body of research in a meaningful way (that is, they're not just doing what others have already done).
• A methods section, where authors describe how they collected and analyzed data.  Statistical analyses are included.  This section is quite detailed, as it's important that other researchers be able to verify and/or replicate these methods.
• A results section describes the outcomes of the data analysis.  Charts and graphs illustrating the results are typically included.
• In the discussion , authors will explain their interpretation of their results and theorize on their importance to existing and future research.
• References or works cited are always included.  These are the articles and books that the authors drew upon to plan their study and to support their discussion.

You can use the library's databases  to search for research articles:

• A research article will nearly always be published in a peer-reviewed journal; click here for instructions on limiting your searches to peer-reviewed articles .  
• If you have a particular type of study in mind, you can include keywords to describe it in your search .  For instance, if you would like to see studies that used surveys to collect data, you can add "survey" to your topic in the database's search box. See this example search in our EBSCO databases: " bullying and survey ".   
• Several of our databases have special limiting options that allow you to select specific methodologies.  See, for instance, the " Methodology " box in ProQuest's PsycARTICLES Advanced Search (scroll down a bit to see it).  It includes options like "Empirical Study" and "Qualitative Study", among many others.  

A review article is a secondary source ...it is written about other articles, and does not report original research of its own.  Review articles are very important, as they draw upon the articles that they review to suggest new research directions, to strengthen support for existing theories and/or identify patterns among exising research studies.  For student researchers, review articles provide a great overview of the existing literature on a topic.    If you find a literature review that fits your topic, take a look at its references/works cited list for leads on other relevant articles and books!

You can use the library's article databases to find literature reviews as well!  Click here for tips.

• Share on Facebook

Was this helpful? Yes 7 No 1

Related Topics

• Articles & Journals
• Information Literacy

Need personalized help? Librarians are available 365 days/nights per year!  See our schedule.

Learn more about how librarians can help you succeed.    

Reference management. Clean and simple.

Types of research papers

Analytical research paper

Argumentative or persuasive paper, definition paper, compare and contrast paper, cause and effect paper, interpretative paper, experimental research paper, survey research paper, frequently asked questions about the different types of research papers, related articles.

There are multiple different types of research papers. It is important to know which type of research paper is required for your assignment, as each type of research paper requires different preparation. Below is a list of the most common types of research papers.

➡️ Read more:  What is a research paper?

In an analytical research paper you:

• pose a question
• collect relevant data from other researchers
• analyze their different viewpoints

You focus on the findings and conclusions of other researchers and then make a personal conclusion about the topic. It is important to stay neutral and not show your own negative or positive position on the matter.

The argumentative paper presents two sides of a controversial issue in one paper. It is aimed at getting the reader on the side of your point of view.

You should include and cite findings and arguments of different researchers on both sides of the issue, but then favor one side over the other and try to persuade the reader of your side. Your arguments should not be too emotional though, they still need to be supported with logical facts and statistical data.

Tip: Avoid expressing too much emotion in a persuasive paper.

The definition paper solely describes facts or objective arguments without using any personal emotion or opinion of the author. Its only purpose is to provide information. You should include facts from a variety of sources, but leave those facts unanalyzed.

Compare and contrast papers are used to analyze the difference between two:

Make sure to sufficiently describe both sides in the paper, and then move on to comparing and contrasting both thesis and supporting one.

Cause and effect papers are usually the first types of research papers that high school and college students write. They trace probable or expected results from a specific action and answer the main questions "Why?" and "What?", which reflect effects and causes.

In business and education fields, cause and effect papers will help trace a range of results that could arise from a particular action or situation.

An interpretative paper requires you to use knowledge that you have gained from a particular case study, for example a legal situation in law studies. You need to write the paper based on an established theoretical framework and use valid supporting data to back up your statement and conclusion.

This type of research paper basically describes a particular experiment in detail. It is common in fields like:

Experiments are aimed to explain a certain outcome or phenomenon with certain actions. You need to describe your experiment with supporting data and then analyze it sufficiently.

This research paper demands the conduction of a survey that includes asking questions to respondents. The conductor of the survey then collects all the information from the survey and analyzes it to present it in the research paper.

➡️ Ready to start your research paper? Take a look at our guide on how to start a research paper .

In an analytical research paper, you pose a question and then collect relevant data from other researchers to analyze their different viewpoints. You focus on the findings and conclusions of other researchers and then make a personal conclusion about the topic.

The definition paper solely describes facts or objective arguments without using any personal emotion or opinion of the author. Its only purpose is to provide information.

Cause and effect papers are usually the first types of research papers that high school and college students are confronted with. The answer questions like "Why?" and "What?", which reflect effects and causes. In business and education fields, cause and effect papers will help trace a range of results that could arise from a particular action or situation.

This type of research paper describes a particular experiment in detail. It is common in fields like biology, chemistry or physics. Experiments are aimed to explain a certain outcome or phenomenon with certain actions.

What are the main differences between an article and a research paper?  

Insight from top 3 papers, source papers (3).

Related Questions

To write a research article, it is important to focus on evidence-based results and present new insights to add to the existing knowledge. The article should have a clear structure, with sections such as literature review, methodology, results, and discussion. The literature review should position the ideas in the context of the study . The methodology section should explain the research process and how data was collected and analyzed . The results section should be organized in a logical order, emphasizing key results using visual elements and direct quotes . The discussion section should use the data, methods, and literature to argue and strengthen the article's claims . Finally, the article should provide concluding remarks and recommendations in relation to the research objectives . Following these guidelines and adhering to publication standards and guidelines can help produce a quality research article .

The main points of the research papers are as follows: - A research paper is a verbal presentation of research findings in a reliable and persuasive manner. It includes a problem/question, research area, and the researcher's perspective. The thesis statement states the main point of the research paper. - Heterogeneous systems are becoming a new trend in high-performance computing, but programming them is difficult. This paper proposes using abstract technology to enhance the granularity of parallel programming and designs a structured parallel programming prototype system. - Landslides cause extensive socio-economic destruction, fatalities, and injuries. They also disrupt ecological systems, damage cultural artifacts, and interfere with vital infrastructure. Landslide losses are often underestimated, and vulnerability has increased due to deforestation and poor management techniques. - A blind stick with an ultrasonic sensor and Arduino Mega is designed to assist visually impaired individuals. The system detects obstacles and provides feedback through vibration or questions, allowing the person to navigate safely. - Friction stir welding (FSW) is an advanced method for welding aluminum. Optimum conditions for FSW are determined based on the down force of the plunge tool. Different welding conditions can result in flash mass, cavity formation, or abnormal melting of the metal.

Writing a research article involves sharing evidence-based findings with a wider audience, focusing on the theme and structure of the paper to support the author's knowledge claim . The structure of a research article typically follows the IMRaD format, consisting of an introduction, methods, results, and discussion section . The introduction provides a brief overview of the research and its purpose, while the methods section explains the research process in detail . The results section presents the findings without explanation, and the discussion section interprets the results in the context of previous research . The conclusion and limitation sections are prepared based on the results . It is important to consider rhetorical features and metadiscourse when writing research articles, as they vary across disciplines . Following a logical and systematic approach, addressing the problem statement, existing solutions, new solutions, assumptions, limitations, analysis, simulation, and comparison with competing solutions, is crucial in writing a scientific paper . The dissemination of research results is essential for advancing science, and understanding the mechanisms of writing and publishing can help achieve this effectively .

The structure of a research paper typically includes several key components. These components may vary slightly depending on the discipline or journal requirements. Generally, a research paper consists of an introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRaD) format . The introduction provides background information and states the research question or problem . The methods section describes the research design, data collection, and analysis procedures . The results section presents the findings of the study . The discussion section interprets the results, discusses their implications, and relates them to previous research . Additionally, research papers often include an abstract, which provides a concise summary of the paper's main points . The abstract is followed by a list of references, acknowledging and citing the sources used in the paper . Overall, the structure of a research paper aims to present the research in a logical and organized manner, allowing readers to understand and evaluate the study effectively .

Research papers and thesis papers have several similarities. Both involve presenting research findings in a reliable and persuasive manner . They both require a problem or question to be addressed, with the research providing the answer or finding . A thesis statement is a key component of both types of papers, as it states the main point or finding of the research . Additionally, both research papers and thesis papers support their main points with reasoning, data, examples, and interpretations . They also involve a literature review to survey earlier research and identify research gaps . Both types of papers acknowledge and cite secondary sources, but the analysis and interpretation should have the researcher's own voice . Overall, research papers and thesis papers share the goal of disseminating knowledge and information to a larger audience .

Trending Questions

Power dynamics and community participation in development projects in Ghana are crucial aspects that impact the success of initiatives. Studies in Ghana have highlighted challenges such as nonfunctional local structures, inadequate staff, and logistics hindering community involvement in decision-making . Additionally, factors influencing households' intentions to adopt hybrid power systems include perceived risks, costs, and barriers like high upfront costs and limited availability of systems . Furthermore, the study on enterprise development programs in Ghana revealed discrepancies between the appearance of involving entrepreneurs in decision-making and the beneficiaries' perceptions, indicating power-induced factors at play . Moreover, the research on human-wildlife conflicts emphasized the importance of community engagement and participation in mitigating conflicts and promoting coexistence, stressing the need for stakeholder cooperation and trust-building . Lastly, the study on poverty, power dynamics, and environmental degradation in Northern Ghana highlighted how wealthier farmers contribute significantly to deforestation and water pollution, underscoring the influence of power dynamics in environmental practices .

The primary factors hindering the growth of female entrepreneurship in Southwest Nigeria include gender bias, financial constraints, cultural norms, and limited access to finance. Gender bias, as highlighted in , inhibits both income and employment generating potentials, with male dominance hindering female business owners' ability to reduce poverty. Financial difficulties, as noted in and , are a significant restriction for female entrepreneurs in the region. Additionally, cultural factors, such as those related to polygamous family firms as discussed in , can impact women's entrepreneurial behaviors negatively. Limited access to finance, as emphasized in , creates a supply-side finance gap that hinders the performance of female-owned businesses. Addressing these barriers through targeted interventions and support mechanisms can help foster the growth of female entrepreneurship in Southwest Nigeria.

Identity plays a crucial role in peacebuilding and conflict resolution, as highlighted in the provided research contexts. The formation of dual identities, such as in Afghanistan, can lead to sustainable peace by creating a new overarching identity that incorporates individual identities . Religion, a significant factor in identity formation, can act both as a source of conflict and as a tool for conflict resolution and peacebuilding . In protracted conflicts, identity building processes influence perceptions of self and others, impacting behaviors and interests of those involved, emphasizing the interconnectedness of identity and violence . Furthermore, in post-conflict scenarios like Syria, addressing sectarian identities and promoting identity transformations are essential to prevent identities from fueling conflicts and perpetuating violence, highlighting the necessity of genuine peace through appropriate identity transformations . Empirical analyses of identity building processes in conflicts can provide indicators for promoting conflict transformation and positive peace-building efforts .

To standardize and quality-control sabila extracts for modern medicine, a combination of traditional knowledge and modern scientific techniques is essential. Methods such as phytochemical analysis, marker compound identification, and quality control measures are crucial for ensuring the quality, safety, and efficacy of medicinal plant products . Additionally, utilizing high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) can provide a validated analytical tool for qualitative and quantitative analysis, aiding in the standardization of herbal formulations like sabila extracts . Furthermore, conducting basic physicochemical analysis, extraction in different solvents, and analyzing phytochemical constituents through techniques like thin-layer chromatography (TLC) can help maintain quality standards for effective therapeutic usage of sabila extracts in modern medicine . By integrating these methods, a comprehensive approach to standardization and quality control of sabila extracts can be achieved, bridging traditional practices with contemporary healthcare standards.

Perceptions of stalking are influenced by the gender of both the perpetrator and the target. Research indicates that male victims and perpetrators may be perceived as more responsible, with male victims who ignore the perpetrator seen as less in need of police intervention compared to female victims . Additionally, the severity of stalking incidents is estimated to be lower when the perpetrator is an ex-partner rather than a stranger, and when the victim is male rather than female . These findings underscore the importance of considering gender dynamics in stalking situations, highlighting the need for tailored support and interventions based on the specific gender roles and relationships involved in cases of stalking.

Different types of research articles

A guide for early career researchers.

In scholarly literature, there are many different kinds of articles published every year. Original research articles are often the first thing you think of when you hear the words ‘journal article’. In reality, research work often results in a whole mixture of different outputs and it’s not just the final research article that can be published.

Finding a home to publish supporting work in different formats can help you start publishing sooner, allowing you to build your publication record and research profile.

But before you do, it’s very important that you check the  instructions for authors  and the  aims and scope  of the journal(s) you’d like to submit to. These will tell you whether they accept the type of article you’re thinking of writing and what requirements they have around it.

Understanding the different kind of articles

There’s a huge variety of different types of articles – some unique to individual journals – so it’s important to explore your options carefully. While it would be impossible to cover every single article type here, below you’ll find a guide to the most common research articles and outputs you could consider submitting for publication.

Book review

Many academic journals publish book reviews, which aim to provide insight and opinion on recently published scholarly books. Writing book reviews is often a good way to begin academic writing. It can help you get your name known in your field and give you valuable experience of publishing before you write a full-length article.

If you’re keen to write a book review, a good place to start is looking for journals that publish or advertise the books they have available for review. Then it’s just a matter of putting yourself forward for one of them.

You can check whether a journal publishes book reviews by browsing previous issues or by seeing if a book review editor is listed on the editorial board. In addition, some journals publish other types of reviews, such as film, product, or exhibition reviews, so it’s worth bearing those in mind as options as well.

Get familiar with instructions for authors

Be prepared, speed up your submission, and make sure nothing is forgotten by understanding a journal’s individual requirements.

Publishing tips, direct to your inbox

Expert tips and guidance on getting published and maximizing the impact of your research. Register now for weekly insights direct to your inbox.

Case report

A medical case report – also sometimes called a clinical case study – is an original short report that provides details of a single patient case.

Case reports include detailed information on the symptoms, signs, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of an individual patient. They remain one of the cornerstones of medical progress and provide many new ideas in medicine.

Depending on the journal, a case report doesn’t necessarily need to describe an especially novel or unusual case as there is benefit from collecting details of many standard cases.

Take a look at  F1000Research’s guidance on case reports , to understand more about what’s required in them. And don’t forget that for all studies involving human participants, informed written consent to take part in the research must be obtained from the participants –  find out more about consent to publish.

Clinical study

In medicine, a clinical study report is a type of article that provides in-depth detail on the methods and results of a clinical trial. They’re typically similar in length and format to original research articles.

Most journals now require that you register protocols for clinical trials you’re involved with in a publicly accessible registry. A list of eligible registries can be found on the  WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) . Trials can also be registered at  clinicaltrials.gov  or the  EU Clinical Trials Register . Once registered, your trial will be assigned a clinical trial number (CTN).

Before you submit a clinical study, you’ll need to include clinical trial numbers and registration dates in the manuscript, usually in the abstract and methods sections.

Commentaries and letters to editors

Letters to editors, as well as ‘replies’ and ‘discussions’, are usually brief comments on topical issues of public and political interest (related to the research field of the journal), anecdotal material, or readers’ reactions to material published in the journal.

Commentaries are similar, though they may be slightly more in-depth, responding to articles recently published in the journal. There may be a ‘target article’ which various commentators are invited to respond to.

You’ll need to look through previous issues of any journal you’re interested in writing for and review the instructions for authors to see which types of these articles (if any) they accept.

Conference materials

Many of our medical journals  accept conference material supplements. These are open access peer-reviewed, permanent, and citable publications within the journal. Conference material supplements record research around a common thread, as presented at a workshop, congress, or conference, for the scientific record. They can include the following types of articles:

Poster extracts

Conference abstracts

Presentation extracts

Find out more about submitting conference materials.

Data notes  are a short peer-reviewed article type that concisely describe research data stored in a repository. Publishing a data note can help you to maximize the impact of your data and gain appropriate credit for your research.

Data notes promote the potential reuse of research data and include details of why and how the data were created. They do not include any analysis but they can be linked to a research article incorporating analysis of the published dataset, as well as the results and conclusions.

F1000Research  enables you to publish your data note rapidly and openly via an author-centric platform. There is also a growing range of options for publishing data notes in Taylor & Francis journals, including in  All Life  and  Big Earth Data .

Read our guide to data notes to find out more.

Letters or short reports

Letters or short reports (sometimes known as brief communications or rapid communications) are brief reports of data from original research.

Editors publish these reports where they believe the data will be interesting to many researchers and could stimulate further research in the field. There are even entire journals dedicated to publishing letters.

As they’re relatively short, the format is useful for researchers with results that are time sensitive (for example, those in highly competitive or quickly-changing disciplines). This format often has strict length limits, so some experimental details may not be published until the authors write a full original research article.

Brief reports  (previously called Research Notes) are a type of short report published by  F1000Research  – part of the Taylor & Francis Group. To find out more about the requirements for a brief report, take a look at  F1000Research’s guidance .

Method article

A method article is a medium length peer-reviewed, research-focused article type that aims to answer a specific question. It also describes an advancement or development of current methodological approaches and research procedures (akin to a research article), following the standard layout for research articles. This includes new study methods, substantive modifications to existing methods, or innovative applications of existing methods to new models or scientific questions. These should include adequate and appropriate validation to be considered, and any datasets associated with the paper must publish all experimental controls and make full datasets available.  

Posters and slides

With F1000Research, you can publish scholarly posters and slides covering basic scientific, translational, and clinical research within the life sciences and medicine. You can find out more about how to publish posters and slides  on the F1000Research website .

Registered report

A  Registered Report  consists of two different kinds of articles: a study protocol and an original research article.

This is because the review process for Registered Reports is divided into two stages. In Stage 1, reviewers assess study protocols before data is collected. In Stage 2, reviewers consider the full published study as an original research article, including results and interpretation.

Taking this approach, you can get an in-principle acceptance of your research article before you start collecting data. We’ve got  further guidance on Registered Reports here , and you can also  read F1000Research’s guidance on preparing a Registered Report .

Research article

Original research articles are the most common type of journal article. They’re detailed studies reporting new work and are classified as primary literature.

You may find them referred to as original articles, research articles, research, or even just articles, depending on the journal.

Typically, especially in STEM subjects, these articles will include Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion sections. However, you should always check the instructions for authors of your chosen journal to see whether it specifies how your article should be structured. If you’re planning to write an original research article, take a look at our guidance on  writing a journal article .

Review article

Review articles provide critical and constructive analysis of existing published literature in a field. They’re usually structured to provide a summary of existing literature, analysis, and comparison. Often, they identify specific gaps or problems and provide recommendations for future research.

Unlike original research articles, review articles are considered as secondary literature. This means that they generally don’t present new data from the author’s experimental work, but instead provide analysis or interpretation of a body of primary research on a specific topic. Secondary literature is an important part of the academic ecosystem because it can help explain new or different positions and ideas about primary research, identify gaps in research around a topic, or spot important trends that one individual research article may not.

There are 3 main types of review article

Literature review

Presents the current knowledge including substantive findings as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to a particular topic.

Systematic review

Identifies, appraises and synthesizes all the empirical evidence that meets pre-specified eligibility criteria to answer a specific research question. Researchers conducting systematic reviews use explicit, systematic methods that are selected with a view aimed at minimizing bias, to produce more reliable findings to inform decision making.

Meta-analysis

A quantitative, formal, epidemiological study design used to systematically assess the results of previous research to derive conclusions about that body of research. Typically, but not necessarily, a meta-analysis study is based on randomized, controlled clinical trials.

Take a look at our guide to  writing a review article  for more guidance on what’s required.

Software tool articles

A  software tool article  – published by  F1000Research  – describes the rationale for the development of a new software tool and details of the code used for its construction.

The article should provide examples of suitable input data sets and include an example of the output that can be expected from the tool and how this output should be interpreted. Software tool articles submitted to F1000Research should be written in open access programming languages. Take a look at  their guidance  for more details on what’s required of a software tool article.

Further resources

Ready to write your article, but not sure where to start?

For more guidance on how to prepare and write an article for a journal you can download the  Writing your paper eBook .

Journal Article vs Research Paper: Difference and Comparison

Sharing is caring!

A journal article presents original research findings in a concise format, focusing on a specific topic within a broader field. It undergoes peer review before publication, ensuring quality and validity. On the other hand, a research paper is a comprehensive document that may include multiple experiments, analyses, and discussions, aimed at contributing to the advancement of scientific knowledge.

Key Takeaways A journal article is a shorter scholarly writing published in a specific academic journal. A research paper is a more extended, comprehensive academic writing presenting original research. Journal articles are more focused and present specific findings, while research papers are broader and present a more comprehensive study.

Journal Article vs Research Paper

A journal article is a piece of published work that presents the research findings and may include analysis, remark, or discussion. A research paper is a detailed account of the research that may be published or unpublished and includes an introduction, literature review, methods, results, and conclusion.

Comparison Table

What is Journal Article?

A journal article is a scholarly publication that presents the findings of original research, analysis, or review within a particular academic field. These articles serve as fundamental units of scholarly communication, disseminating new knowledge, theories, and insights to the academic community and beyond. Here’s a detailed breakdown:

Content and Structure

1 Abstract: A journal article begins with an abstract, a concise summary of the study’s objectives, methods, results, and conclusions. The abstract provides readers with a quick overview of the article’s content and findings.

Similar Reads

• A Journal vs An Article: Difference and Comparison
• Wax Paper vs Baking Paper: Difference and Comparison
• Parchment Paper vs Wax Paper: Difference and Comparison
• Research Method vs Research Methodology: Difference and Comparison
• Marketing Research vs Market Research: Difference and Comparison

2 Introduction: Following the abstract, the introduction sets the context for the study by reviewing relevant literature, identifying gaps or controversies in existing knowledge, and stating the research objectives or hypotheses.

3 Methods: The methods section outlines the procedures, materials, and techniques used to conduct the study. It should provide sufficient detail to enable replication of the experiment or analysis by other researchers.

4 Results: This section presents the findings of the study, using tables, figures, or graphs to illustrate data. Authors describe the results objectively, without interpretation or speculation.

5 Discussion: In the discussion section, authors interpret the results in light of the study’s objectives and existing literature. They may address the implications of their findings, suggest future research directions, and discuss limitations or potential sources of bias.

6 Conclusion: The conclusion summarizes the main findings of the study and highlights their significance. It may also reiterate the study’s contribution to the field and offer final reflections or recommendations.

Peer Review Process:

1 Submission: Authors submit their articles to scholarly journals for publication consideration, adhering to the journal’s guidelines and formatting requirements.

2 Peer Review: Upon submission, the journal’s editor assigns the manuscript to peer reviewers—experts in the field—who evaluate the article’s quality, originality, methodology, and significance. Peer review helps ensure the rigor and credibility of the research.

3 Revision: Based on the reviewers’ feedback, authors may revise their article to address any concerns or criticisms raised. This iterative process of revision and reevaluation continues until the article meets the journal’s standards for publication.

4 Acceptance and Publication: If the article meets the journal’s criteria, it is accepted for publication and undergoes final editing and formatting. Once published, the article becomes part of the journal’s archive and is accessible to readers worldwide.

What is Research Paper?

A research paper is a comprehensive document that presents the findings, analysis, and interpretations of original research conducted by the author(s) within a specific academic discipline. These papers serve as a means for scholars to contribute new knowledge, theories, and insights to their respective fields. Here’s a detailed breakdown:

1. Content and Structure

1 Introduction: The introduction of a research paper provides background information on the topic, reviews relevant literature, and outlines the research objectives or hypotheses. It establishes the context for the study and justifies its significance.

2 Methods: The methods section describes the procedures, materials, and techniques employed in the research. It should provide sufficient detail to enable other researchers to replicate the study and verify its results.

3 Results: This section presents the empirical findings of the research, using tables, figures, or graphs to illustrate data. Authors report their observations or measurements objectively, without interpretation or speculation.

4 Discussion: In the discussion section, authors interpret the results in light of the research questions or hypotheses, comparing them to previous studies and addressing their implications. They may also explore alternative explanations, limitations of the study, and avenues for future research.

5 Conclusion: The conclusion summarizes the main findings of the research and highlights their significance. It may reiterate the study’s contribution to the field, offer final reflections, and suggest directions for further inquiry.

Characteristics and Scope

1 Original Research: Unlike review papers or essays, research papers are based on original research conducted by the authors. They contribute new data, insights, or interpretations to the academic discourse.

2 Rigorous Methodology: Research papers adhere to rigorous scientific or scholarly methodologies, employing systematic approaches to data collection, analysis, and interpretation. They prioritize objectivity, validity, and reliability in their findings.

3 Length and Complexity: Research papers vary in length and complexity, depending on the scope of the study and the requirements of the target publication venue. They may range from concise reports of preliminary findings to comprehensive analyses of multi-year research projects.

4 Contribution to Knowledge: Research papers aim to advance knowledge within their respective fields by addressing research gaps, testing hypotheses, or generating new theories. They contribute to the cumulative growth of scholarship through the dissemination of original research findings.

Main Differences Between Journal Article and Research Paper

• Journal articles focus on a specific aspect or finding within a broader topic.
• Research papers provide a comprehensive analysis of a research project, including multiple experiments, analyses, and discussions.
• Journal articles are concise, containing essential findings, methods, and interpretations in a limited space.
• Research papers tend to be longer and more detailed, offering exhaustive exploration of the research topic, methodology, results, and implications.
• Journal articles undergo peer review by experts in the field before publication, ensuring quality and validity.
• Research papers may or may not undergo formal peer review, depending on the publication venue or academic requirements.
• Journal articles present findings objectively, without extensive interpretation or speculation.
• Research papers include in-depth interpretation of results, discussion of implications, and exploration of potential limitations or biases.
• Journal articles contribute to the scholarly conversation by presenting new findings, analyses, or reviews within a specific topic area.
• Research papers advance knowledge within a field by offering comprehensive analyses, testing hypotheses, or generating new theories through original research.

• https://gssrr.org/index.php/gssrr/How-to-Publish-Research-Paper
• https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/types-of-journal-manuscripts/1356
• https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/research_papers/index.html

I’ve put so much effort writing this blog post to provide value to you. It’ll be very helpful for me, if you consider sharing it on social media or with your friends/family. SHARING IS ♥️

Want to save this article for later? Click the heart in the bottom right corner to save to your own articles box!

By Emma Smith

Emma Smith holds an MA degree in English from Irvine Valley College. She has been a Journalist since 2002, writing articles on the English language, Sports, and Law. Read more about me on her bio page .

Related Post

Arithmetic progression vs arithmetic sequence: difference and comparison, arithmetic mean vs geometric sequence: difference and comparison, discipline vs punishment: difference and comparison, how to search for a word on a web page: a quick guide for all browsers, ultimate list of helpful windows alt codes: easily insert special characters, how to add a border in google docs: a quick guide, 25 best anime streaming sites to watch anime online.

• SpringerLink shop

Types of journal articles

It is helpful to familiarise yourself with the different types of articles published by journals. Although it may appear there are a large number of types of articles published due to the wide variety of names they are published under, most articles published are one of the following types; Original Research, Review Articles, Short reports or Letters, Case Studies, Methodologies.

Original Research:

This is the most common type of journal manuscript used to publish full reports of data from research. It may be called an  Original Article, Research Article, Research, or just  Article, depending on the journal. The Original Research format is suitable for many different fields and different types of studies. It includes full Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion sections.

Short reports or Letters:

These papers communicate brief reports of data from original research that editors believe will be interesting to many researchers, and that will likely stimulate further research in the field. As they are relatively short the format is useful for scientists with results that are time sensitive (for example, those in highly competitive or quickly-changing disciplines). This format often has strict length limits, so some experimental details may not be published until the authors write a full Original Research manuscript. These papers are also sometimes called Brief communications .

Review Articles:

Review Articles provide a comprehensive summary of research on a certain topic, and a perspective on the state of the field and where it is heading. They are often written by leaders in a particular discipline after invitation from the editors of a journal. Reviews are often widely read (for example, by researchers looking for a full introduction to a field) and highly cited. Reviews commonly cite approximately 100 primary research articles.

TIP: If you would like to write a Review but have not been invited by a journal, be sure to check the journal website as some journals to not consider unsolicited Reviews. If the website does not mention whether Reviews are commissioned it is wise to send a pre-submission enquiry letter to the journal editor to propose your Review manuscript before you spend time writing it.  

Case Studies:

These articles report specific instances of interesting phenomena. A goal of Case Studies is to make other researchers aware of the possibility that a specific phenomenon might occur. This type of study is often used in medicine to report the occurrence of previously unknown or emerging pathologies.

Methodologies or Methods

These articles present a new experimental method, test or procedure. The method described may either be completely new, or may offer a better version of an existing method. The article should describe a demonstrable advance on what is currently available.

Back │ Next

Difference Between Research Article and Research Paper

This article will discuss both writings formats and discuss Difference Between Research Article and Research Paper.

Both types of writing are common techniques used by educators and businesses to get feedback from coworkers and students on a topic or subject. One must understand each form and how people use it in to differentiate between the two types of writing.

Research Article

What will a researcher or scientist do after they have found the answer to a question or made a discovery they wish to share with the world?

A research article, according to Simon Fraser University, is a piece of writing that is written about a specific topic. A research article written by an expert in a certain field is frequently written by another expert in the same field. Peer reviews are another term for this kind of writing.

Purpose of Research Article

A research article may be a significant source, making it a valuable resource for creating the thesis for the relevant topic. It includes a report on the methods and results of the researchers’ original research.

Format of Research Article

Create a title that is specific enough to summarize the entire article’s content while being understandable. The article’s title ought to be relevant for the target audience.

Other people have made significant contributions in writing the research article that is published, and as a result, they are considered authors. Before listing your mentor’s name as a co-author or author, you can get their permission.

Giving all the information in a single paragraph is not very simple. Start by including the overview of what you feel is vital to mention, and then gradually reduce the length by omitting the unimportant details while keeping the crucial information.

→INTRODUCTION

A two- to four-paragraph introduction is appropriate. Finish it up with a statement that clarifies the question.

If you have a complicated method, it can be beneficial to include diagrams, flowcharts, or tables to describe how you use it.

What pain-reduction measures would you adopt if you used animals?

Don’t discuss the outcomes or speculate as to why anything occurred. None of the information you discovered from research needs to be mentioned.   Employ appropriate techniques to explain the data. Don’t try to distort your facts to make it appear that you have accomplished more than you have.

→TABLES AND GRAPHS

→discussion.

Provide reasons if the results are surprising.

→ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

→references, research paper.

When referring to research papers, Dr. Jane Simonsen, a history professor, once said, “The work and design are your own, but you can’t do it without relying on the efforts and wisdom of others.”

After gathering all necessary information from sources, a student’s work will be organized into the structure. Teachers frequently use this method to help students develop a balance in their writing abilities while promoting structural discipline and standard formatting.

Purpose of Research Paper

Format for research papers.

There is a set format for research papers. 

Read More: Reliability vs Validity | Examples

References and citations can be added here. References are genuine books and articles that authors use to conduct their research and support their arguments.

Difference Between Research Paper and Research Article

3- A research paper isn’t published in any publication unless it’s a guideline on how to write one, whereas a research article is submitted to periodicals, magazines or peer-reviewed journal.

6- The title of the research paper will be centered, and the student’s name, class, date, and teacher will be in the left corner. Whereas the title will be top and centre in the research article. The names of the author(s) are listed below.

Other articles

Comparision

Related Posts

Inductive vs deductive approach: which is more effective, 8 types of validity in research | examples, nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio scales | measurement of scale, conclusive research | types, pros, operationalization of variables in research | examples | benefits, types of quasi experimental design, difference between experimental and non-experimental research, 10 types of variables in research | examples, types of descriptive research: methods and examples, difference between basic and applied research with examples.

Difference between Research Paper and Research Article

Research paper and research articles are bits of composing that require inquiry, critical analysis, demonstration and insight of few special abilities from understudies and researchers. This article endeavors to see whether the two terms are synonymous or there is any contrast between the two.

Research paper

Research can be said as activity which is specified much significance in scholastics. Be that as it may, research papers are not only these task papers composed by understudies as those composed by scholars and researchers and also published in different journals are additionally alluded to as research papers.

Research Article

Research article is a bit of composing that have original research thought with the pertinent data and discoveries. A research article is a composing or paper that advises individuals of a way breaking a finding or research with data to bolster the finding.

Research Paper VS Research Article

 There is a pattern to allude to academic papers and term papers composed by understudies in schools as a research paper

The articles presented by researchers and scholars with their noteworthy examination are known as research articles.

Research papers composed by the students mostly not take in journals.

Research articles composed by researchers or scholars mostly published in prestigious scientific journals.

A research paper depends on the original research. The sort of research may fluctuate, contingent upon your field or topics that include survey, experiments, questionnaire, interview and so on; yet authors require gathering and investigating raw data and make an original and real study. The research paper will be founded on the investigation and understanding of this raw data.

A research article depends on other different published articles. It is usually not depend on original study. Research articles for the most part condense the current writing on a point trying to clarify the present condition of comprehension on topic.

A research paper can be said as the primary source that means, it studies the techniques and consequences of original study performed by the writers.

A research article can be said as secondary source that means it is composed about different articles, and does not studies actual research of its own.

• Importance:

In research paper, every part of this has its own importance. A concise is important in light of the fact that it shows that the writers know about existing literature, and want to add to this presented research definitively. A methods part is usually detailed and it is important in a way that different analysts have the capacity to check and/or duplicate these strategies. A result segment depicts the results of the analysis.

Research articles can be considered very important because they describe upon different articles that they analyze to propose new research bearings, to give powerful support for presented theories or distinguish designs among presented research studies. For understudy analysts, these research articles give an excellent review of presented literature on that topic. In the event that you discover a literature review that can be fit in study, investigate its references/works referred to list for guide on other articles.

From the above article we can conclude that research paper is the primary source whereas research articles are secondary.

Share this:

• Share on Tumblr

17 Comments Already

good article but which of them is more useful when we conduct a research

both. but research paper is more useful.

Nice explanation

There is a little difference but both are different.

Nice but i have a confusion that can a guys of Bachelors level can write Research Papers?

YEs they can if they do research project instead of development project and do something new in their project.

Thank you 😊

do you have something in your mind then please share with us. We will appreciate that.

Though it may be fairly easy to learn to speak English well enough to be understood, learning to write English correctly is very difficult, as this article so clearly illustrates. Though I greatly admire all those who are making an effort to learn another language, like English, as a non-native speaker, it is wrong for these same individuals to assume they can write English well enough to publish articles.

This article is so poorly written that I cannot understand most of it. For instance, the following phrases are utter nonsense: “A research paper can be said as the primary source that means,” — “A concise is important in light of the fact that it shows that . . .” — “A methods part is usually detailed” — “A result segment depicts the results . . .” — “they describe upon different articles that they analyze to propose new research bearings . . . or distinguish designs among presented . .. studies” — “to clarify the present condition of comprehension” — “Research papers and . . . articles require inquiry, critical analysis, demonstration and insight of few special abilities from . . .”

This article also states that “[a] research article . . . is usually not depend (sic) on original study,” then contradicts that in the next sentence with “[r]esearch articles . . . condense the current writing on a point . . .” Most studies these days are current. But, even if a study was conducted 50 years ago, it’s a cardinal rule that one should always use the original source of information rather than relying on the articles of other authors who may have misquoted something from the original study.

Articles like this one do a grave disservice to the viewing and researching public. To present this article as informative is disingenuous. To ask people who are seeking useful information to struggle with reading and trying to make sense of this poor English is so unkind and inconsiderate that I feel compelled to bring it to the author’s and publisher’s attention.

I would be honored to help anyone with their efforts to write English, but, please, be honest with yourselves about your lack of knowledge, so you will cease and desist the writing of anything online until your English skills have improved significantly. Thank you.

Thanks for such a detail input. Best wishes.

Yes you are saying right. So if you have the skills to deliver the answer in an efficient manner so kindly type it for me. Because I really want to know the difference between research paper and research article

Yes I agree with Martha. I myself found difficulty in going through the article. Although the topic is very important to be discussed because being the student of graduate, I must know the difference. But the way of delivering has dispirited me that now what other website should I visit to get accurate answer.

we need Published example of a scientific research article and another for a scientific research

how can I cite this?

“Difference between Research Paper and Research Article”, Reserachpedia.info, https://researchpedia.info/difference-between-research-paper-and-research-article/ , [27 December 2021].

I don’t understand anything. I am confused more than i came. Otehrwise, thank you for a trial. Simplify this communication.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email.

• Health Sciences Research Strategies
• The research process
• Defining your topic and crafting your research question
• Identifying search terms from your question
• Broaden or narrow your search
• Research methods
• Find articles in health science databases
• Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
• Interlibrary loan
• Find books and ebooks
• Find background information
• Types of Sources
• How to distinguish between types of journal articles
• Components of a scholarly article, and things to consider when reading one
• Critically evaluating articles & other sources
• Evidence Based Practice Portal (opens a new guide) This link opens in a new window
• Literature reviews (opens a new guide) This link opens in a new window
• Annotated bibliographies
• Writing tools
• Citing sources (opens a new guide) This link opens in a new window
• Understanding & Avoiding Plagiarism (opens a new guide) This link opens in a new window

Contact me for research assistance

Distinguishing between different types of journal articles

When writing a paper or conducting academic research, you’ll come across many different types of sources, including periodical articles. Periodical articles can be comprised of news accounts, opinion, commentary, scholarly analysis, and/or reports of research findings. There are three main types of periodicals that you will encounter: scholarly/academic, trade, and popular.  The chart below will help you identify which type of periodical your article comes from.

Text and chart adapted from the WSU University Libraries' How to Distinguish Between Types of Periodicals  and Types of Periodicals guides

What makes information peer-reviewed vs. scholarly vs. non-scholarly? Which type of source should I use?

• What makes information peer-reviewed vs. scholarly vs. non-scholarly?
• Which type of source should I use?

There is a nuanced distinction between peer-review and scholarship, which typically doesn't matter when evaluating sources for possible citation in your own work.  Peer-review is a process through which editors of a journal have other experts in the field evaluate articles submitted to the journal for possible publication.  Different journals have different ways of defining an expert in the field.  Scholarly works, by contrast have an editorial process, but this process does not involve expert peer-reviewers.  Rather, one or more editors, who are themselves often highly decorated scholars in a field, evaluate submissions for possible publication.  This editorial process can be more economically driven than a peer-review process, with a greater emphasis on marketing and selling the published material, but as a general rule this distinction is trivial with regard to evaluating information for possible citation in your own work.

What is perhaps a more salient way of thinking about the peer-review / scholarship distinction is to recognize that while peer-reviewed information is typically highly authoritative, and is generally considered "good" information, the absence of a peer-review process doesn't automatically make information "bad."  More specifically, the only thing the absence of a peer-review process means is that information published in this manner is not peer-reviewed.  Nothing more.  Information that falls into this category is sometimes referred to as "non-scholarly" information -- but again, that doesn't mean this information is somehow necessarily problematic.

Where does that leave you in terms of deciding what type of information to use in producing your own work?  That is a highly individual decision that you must make.  The Which type of source should I use?  tab in this box offers further guidance on answering this question, though it is important to be aware that many WSU instructors will only consider peer-reviewed sources to be acceptable in the coursework you turn in .  You can ask your instructor for his or her thoughts on the types of sources s/he will accept in student work.

Image:  Martin Grater. (2017, Nov. 1). Deep Thought. Retrieved from https://www.flickr.com/photos/152721954@N05/24304490568/. Used under the Creative Commons License.

Your topic and research question or thesis statement will guide you on which resources are best.  Sources can be defined as primary, secondary and tertiary levels away from an event or original idea. Researchers may want to start with tertiary or secondary source for background information. Learning more about a topic will help most researchers make better use of primary sources.

While articles from scholarly journals are often the most prominent of the sources you will consider incorporating into your coursework, they are not the only sources available to you.  Which sources are most appropriate to your research is a direct consequence of they type of research question you decide to address.  In other words, while most university-level papers will require you to reference scholarly sources, not all will.  A student in an English course writing a paper analyzing Bob Dylan's lyrics, for example, may find an interview with Dylan published in Rolling Stone magazine a useful source to cite alongside other scholarly works of literary criticism.

The WSU University Libraries' What Sources Should I Use? handout, as well as the other sub-tabs under the  Evaluating information  section of this guide (which is indeed the section you are currently viewing) offer further guidance on understanding and identifying scholarly resources, and comparing them against different criteria to evaluate if they will be of value to your research.  How many non-scholarly works (if any) you are at liberty to cite alongside scholarly ones is often a question to ask of your professor.  Some may not want you to cite any, whereas others may be ok with some non-scholarly works cited alongside scholarly ones.

Image:  Brett Woods. (2006, Jan. 6). Deep Thoughts. Retrieved from https://www.flickr.com/photos/brettanicus/87653641/. Used under the Creative Commons License.

• << Previous: Types of Sources
• Next: Components of a scholarly article, and things to consider when reading one >>
• Last Updated: Jul 8, 2024 10:29 AM
• URL: https://libraries.wichita.edu/health-research

International Journal of Research (IJR)

IJR Journal is Multidisciplinary, high impact and indexed journal for research publication. IJR is a monthly journal for research publication.

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RESEARCH PAPER AND JOURNAL ARTICLE

Difference between research paper and journal article.

Research Paper

Argumentative Research Paper

Analytical research paper, journal article, the differences, research paper:, journal article:.

• Share on Tumblr

• Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
• Subscribe Subscribed
• Copy shortlink
• Report this content
• View post in Reader
• Manage subscriptions
• Collapse this bar

Journal Article vs. Research Paper — What's the Difference?

Difference Between Journal Article and Research Paper

Table of contents, key differences, comparison chart, review process, length & scope, publication, compare with definitions, journal article, research paper, common curiosities, what's the main difference between a journal article and a research paper, are journal articles always peer-reviewed, who reads journal articles, can a research paper become a journal article, who typically writes journal articles, why are citations important in both journal articles and research papers, do journal articles have a word limit, are all journal articles based on experimental research, where can i find journal articles, is a thesis the same as a research paper, can i use a journal article as a reference for my research paper, do all research papers get published, why is it essential for a journal article to be peer-reviewed, do all academic journals charge to publish journal articles, how long can a research paper be, share your discovery.

Author Spotlight

Popular Comparisons

Trending Comparisons

New Comparisons

Trending Terms

"How Do I?" @JWULibrary

Sample Question

• JWU-Providence Library

Q. What's the difference between a research article and a review article?

• 35 about the library
• 29 articles & journals
• 1 Borrowing
• 8 citing sources
• 17 company & industry
• 11 computers
• 1 copyright compliance
• 5 countries & travel
• 2 course registration
• 50 databases
• 3 education
• 2 Interlibrary loan
• 5 job search
• 6 libguides
• 9 market research
• 25 my library account
• 12 requests
• 26 research basics
• 21 research topics
• 2 study rooms
• 16 technology
• 7 textbooks
• 42 university
• 3 video tutorial
• 1 writing_help

Answered By: Sarah Naomi Campbell Last Updated: Sep 07, 2018     Views: 215816

Watch this short video to learn about types of scholarly articles, including research articles and literature reviews!

Not in the mood for a video? Read on!

What's the difference between a research article and a review article?

Research articles , sometimes referred to as empirical  or primary sources , report on original research. They will typically include sections such as an introduction, methods, results, and discussion.

Here is a more detailed explanation of research articles .

Review articles , sometimes called literature reviews  or secondary sources , synthesize or analyze research already conducted in primary sources. They generally summarize the current state of research on a given topic.

Here is a more detailed explanation of review articles .

The video above was created by the Virginia Commonwealth University Libraries .

The defintions, and the linked detailed explanations, are paraphrased from the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association , 6th ed .

The linked explanations are provided by the Mohawk Valley Community College Libraries .

Links & Files

• How do I find empirical articles in the library databases?
• Share on Facebook

Was this helpful? Yes 63 No 19

Comments (0)

Related topics.

• about the library
• articles & journals
• citing sources
• company & industry
• copyright compliance
• countries & travel
• course registration
• Interlibrary loan
• market research
• my library account
• research basics
• research topics
• study rooms
• video tutorial
• writing_help

Downcity Library:

111 Dorrance Street Providence, Rhode Island 02903

401-598-1121

Harborside Library:

321 Harborside Boulevard Providence, RI 02905

401-598-1466

• Location and Directions
• Off-Campus Access
• Staff Directory
• Student Employment
• Pay Bills and Fines
• Chat with a Librarian
• Course Reserves
• Interlibrary Loan (ILL)
• Study Rooms
• Research Appointment
• Culinary Museum

• Key Differences

Know the Differences & Comparisons

Difference Between Thesis and Research Paper

On the other hand, a research paper is analytical, argumentative and interpretative in nature. It involves the pursuit of knowledge and intelligent analysis of the information collected. It contains the idea of the author, often supported by expert opinions, research and information available in this regard.

Whether you are writing a thesis or research paper, they are equally challenging and take a lot of time to prepare. In this post, we will update you on all the points of difference between thesis and  research paper.

Content: Thesis Vs Research Paper

• Key Elements
• Thesis Statement

How to start a research paper?

Comparison chart.

What is Thesis?

The thesis is a document containing the research and findings that students submit to get the professional qualification or degree . It has to be argumentative, which proposes a debatable point with which people could either agree or disagree. In short, it is a research report in writing that contains a problem which is yet to be dealt with.

In a thesis, the researcher puts forth his/her conclusion. The researcher also gives evidence in support of the conclusion.

Submission of the thesis is a mandatory requirement of a postgraduate course and PhD degree. In this, the primary focus is on the novelty of research along with the research methodology.

It is all about possibilities, by introducing several anti-thesis. Also, it ends up all the possibilities by nullifying all these anti-thesis.

Key Elements of Thesis

• Proposition : The thesis propagates an idea, hypothesis or recommendation.
• Argument : Gives reasons for accepting the proposition instead of just asserting a point of view.
• Maintenance of argument : The argument should be made cogent enough by providing suitable logic and adequate evidence.

Features of An Ideal Thesis

• An Ideal thesis is expected to add fresh knowledge to the existing theory.
• It communicates the central idea of the research in a clear and concise manner.
• An effective thesis is more than a simple statement, fact or question.
• It answers why and how questions concerned with the topic.
• To avoid confusion, it is worded carefully.
• It outlines the direction and scope of your essay.
• It gives reasons to the reader to continue reading.

Also Read : Difference Between Thesis and Dissertation

What is Thesis Statement?

A thesis statement is a sentence of one line, usually written at the end of your first paragraph. It presents the argument to the reader.

It is a blueprint of your thesis that directs the writer while writing the thesis and guides the reader through it.

What is Research Paper?

Research Paper is a form of academic writing. It is prepared on the basis of the original research conducted by the author on a specific topic, along with its analysis and interpretation of the findings.

An author generally starts writing a research paper on the basis of what he knows about the topic and seeks to find out what experts know. Further, it involves thorough and systematic research on a particular subject to extract the maximum information.

In short, a research paper is a written and published report containing the results of scientific research or a review of published scientific papers. Here, the scientific research is the primary research article, while the review of a published scientific paper is the review article.

In case of the primary research article, the author of the research paper provides important information about the research. This enables the scientific community members to:

• Evaluate it
• Reproduce the experiments
• Assess the reasoning and conclusions drawn

On the other hand, a review article is written to analyze, summarize and synthesize the research carried out previously.

When a research work is published in a scientific journal, it conveys the knowledge to a larger group of people and also makes people aware of the scientific work. Research work published as a research paper passes on knowledge and information to many people. The research paper provides relevant information about the disease and the treatment options at hand .

To start writing a research paper, one should always go for a topic that is interesting and a bit challenging too. Here, the key to choosing the topic is to pick the one that you can manage. So, you could avoid such topics which are very technical or specialized and also those topics for which data is not easily available. Also, do not go for any controversial topic.

The researcher’s approach and attitude towards the topic will decide the amount of effort and enthusiasm.

Steps for writing Research Paper

The total number of pages included in a Research Paper relies upon the research topic. It may include 8 to 10 pages, which are:

• Introduction
• Review of Literature
• Methodology
• Research Analysis
• Recommendations

Also Read : Difference Between Research Proposal and Research Report

Key Differences Between Thesis and Research Paper

• A thesis implies an original, plagiarism-free, written academic document that acts as a final project for a university degree of a higher level. But, Research Paper is a novel, plagiarism-free long essay. It portrays the interpretation, evaluation or argument submitted by a researcher.
• The thesis acts as a final project. Whereas a research paper is a kind of research manual of journals.
• The length of the thesis is around 20,000 to 80,000 words. On the contrary, the length of the research paper is relative to the study.
• The thesis focuses on the central question or statement of an intellectual argument that entails further research. On the contrary, the research paper is concerned with proving the central argument.
• The purpose of submitting the thesis is to get the degree or professional qualification. It also presents the knowledge of the candidate in the respective field. Conversely, the aim of publishing research papers is to prove credibility and contribute knowledge in the respective field.
• While the student submits the thesis to the educational committee or panel of professors who review it. In contrast, scientists and other researchers read and review the research paper.
• Preparation and completion of thesis is always under the guidance of a supervisor. For submission of the thesis, the university assigns a supervisor to each student, under whose guidance the thesis must be completed. As against, no supervisor is appointed as a guide in case of a research paper.
• The thesis contains a broader description of the subject matter. In contrast, the research paper contains a narrow description of the subject matter.

Once the research paper is published, it increases the fellowship and job opportunities for new researchers. On the other hand, thesis writing will enable the students to get the desired degree at the end of the course they have opted.

You Might Also Like:

Dr. Owenga says

February 23, 2023 at 2:38 pm

So good and informative. These are quite beneficial insights. Thanks

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Stack Exchange Network

Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow , the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

Q&A for work

Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.

What is the difference between letter, communication and journal paper?

Scientific literature has items called letters, communications and journal papers. They all seem quite similar in terms of format and content. What are the differences between them?

• publications

• 1 This may depend heavily on the specific journal (eg in some 'letters' are a short paper, in others, just an editorial leyter...) –  Andrew is gone Commented Nov 15, 2015 at 9:49

2 Answers 2

In physics, each category has a different length limit. Often "paper" has no limit. Typically the shorter the length limit, the more prestigious it is and the tougher the acceptance criteria. The subject matter covered by the journal is the same for all categories. Some journals also have a "review" category which includes papers which are not original research. Often a review is by invitation only.

• 1 short publications such as "letters" are also peer reviewed? –  Sparkler Commented Nov 14, 2015 at 20:56
• 1 Yes, they are: see for example link.springer.com/journal/11005 . –  gented Commented Nov 14, 2015 at 21:52

This will depend wildly on the field and journal in question. In my experience, the main differentiators are the allowable length and the amount of peer review. For example, in my field (Epidemiology):

• Journal Article (of which there are several categories): Word limit in the several thousands of words, full on peer review.
• Communication (often also called 'Brief Report'): A smaller <2000 word word limit with further restrictions on the number of tables and figures. Goes out for full peer review. This is intended to report a single, small finding that may not warrant a full publication.
• Letters: This is a very ambiguous category, primarily defined by being short, often <1000 words. They may be used to report a single piece of information, often from part of a larger study, or may be used to respond to another paper. These may or may not go out for peer review - for example, I recently had a paper accepted where the decision was made entirely by the editor.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for browse other questions tagged publications ..

• Featured on Meta
• Introducing an accessibility dashboard and some upcoming changes to display...
• We've made changes to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy - July 2024
• Announcing a change to the data-dump process

Hot Network Questions

• How does a plane literally "fall from the sky"?
• Inverse relationship between Stirling numbers of the first and second kind via generating functions
• How do you tell if you're saved as someone with scrupulosity?
• Will lights plugged into cigarette lighter drain the battery to the point that the truck won't start?u
• Operator-precedence calculator in C
• She's a black belt in judo
• Washing machine drain
• If it's true that a reservation fee for a cruise ship is non-refundable, then what happens if somebody cancels?
• What was R' Chanina's Technique to Revive R' Yochanan?
• Can I use specific preprocess hooks for a node type or a view mode?
• Creating specific flash memory area in STM32G0 microcontroller
• Is there a reason SpaceX does not spiral weld Starship rocket bodies?
• Can a Hall sensor be tested with just basic test gear?
• Interview disaster
• Double accentuation (Homeric Greek)
• Definition of a pole in Riemann sphere
• Is there mutable aliasing in this list of variable references?
• Design patterns - benefits of using with Apex code
• Why did Rio Morales say, "De-escalated that one"?
• Delexing a finitely complete category
• MPs assuming office on the day of the election
• sed (or awk): print captured group or placeholder if it doesn't exist
• Should I include MA theses in my PhD literature review?
• How to open a single app in a particular language while the system language is English?

ARDA Conference

ARDA helps students and research scholars in attending conferences and journal publication

Home » Article Writing Services » Difference Between Thesis and Research Article

Difference Between Thesis and Research Article

Thesis writing

The word dissertation is derived from the Latin word dissertation, which means “path”. In some countries, dissertations are also referred to as a thesis. According to the Oxford Dictionary, dissertations can also be defined as long essays on a particular subject or topic written especially for a college degree. Thesis writing can vary in scope, length, and nature, but the main aim and objective remain the same.

Research Article

A Research Article , on the other hand, could be defined as any original and non-plagiarism research. The term ‘research’ refers to the repetition of the search (examination). Repetitive research in various directions to prove the central question of the thesis is generally called ‘research’. A research article will usually, if not always, include the central question of the thesis. There are generally two types of research papers, one being qualitative and the other quantitative.

Differences Between Thesis & Research Article – In Truest Academic Sense

• A thesis is all about a single scholarly statement, and sometimes maybe it’s a summary. The existence of a thesis opens up avenues of inquiry into an infinity of speculative possibilities such as antitheses.
• While the thesis question opens up the limits of these varying possibilities, the primary focus of inquiry persists, remaining unchanged .
• A research article consists of both speculative variables (the majority of which are nullified) and constants that aim to prove the central question of the thesis or the major objective of the research.
• In its purest form, the question that a thesis hopes to answer has a sort of legality in which the outcome warrants the means potentially. Article writing involves explaining the central thesis and constitutes a process of methodological demonstration of this assertion.

Quantitative and qualitative disciplines implement this methodology in various ways depending on the provisions of that particular field. ARDA conference portal helps in writing research articles and thesis writing.

Primary Differences Between Thesis & Research Paper

There are numerous contrasts between a thesis and a research article. Some of these are major differences, while others are more nuanced or subtle. The differences described here come from classical European Enlightenment thought. There are many relevant and alternative defining paradigms and therefore, differences. While only the classicist strain will be explained here, other modes of definitions, differences and similarities will also be presented.

Primary Focus

A thesis is concerned with the central question or statement of a scientific hypothesis that results in further investigation, while a research paper is concerned with proving that central argument.

• The thesis concerns both the possibilities through the formation of numerous antitheses and the end of all the possibilities by the cancellation of all these antitheses.
• The research paper is all about proving the central statement of the thesis and accumulating proof and data to validate the same, investigating other possibilities and invalidating them and presenting speculation on prospective options for the question, which is the central part of the thesis.
• To be accurate, the research paper is all about explaining and proving the thesis.

Length Of The Argument

• The thesis is usually formed by the in-depth original reflection that puts forward a proposition or statement, but the research paper requires a tenacious resilience on the part of the researcher to prove the primary inquisition.
• The latter is a lengthy, drawn-out process in which there is the gathering of evidence, the lifting and cancellation of various other possibilities and the application of theories and evidence to the central question of research. All of this is done to prove the thesis.
• The research paper could be called an elaboration and augmentation of the primary thesis.

Problem Statement

• The term ‘thesis’ is often used in place of the term ‘research article’. This is, however, a rhetorical discrepancy in which a part is substituted for a whole.
• A thesis statement is generally part of the research paper and not the other way around.
• A thesis statement does not include the methodology. A research article illustrates this methodology and offers insight into whether it is of the quantitative or qualitative sort.
• A thesis statement is an end in itself. A research article, meanwhile, although intended to expose and explain the thesis, clearly opens up all the avenues of research that the online thesis statement holds in potentia.
• If the vast majority of these lines are canceled and proven to be “incorrect”, there are few possibilities that still refuse to go away.
• These could, in the future, go into the formation of alternative discursive structures in which the central question of the thesis is no longer valid.
• The research article seen in its “flow”, is also the end of the central thesis statement. Nevertheless, it is generally rich in theoretical and empirical information and detail.
• The thesis statement addresses a single question, while the research article raises several questions, albeit related to the central theme. Some of these questions are canceled and others remain the indicators of alternative discourse.

A research article usually consists of the thesis, but this is not always the case. The research article may be on the part of the thesis question and may have stand-alone validity. Are you confused about your research article writing and journals ? Inquiry or Comment us below we help in article writing services .

3 Replies to “Difference Between Thesis and Research Article”

I’m looking to have my dissertation published in a journal, however, I need help with writing a research article and wish to know if you can help.

Thanks for your inquiry. Our concerned coordinator will contact you shortly. Do check your spam folder if it doesn’t arrive in your inbox.

Fruitful information

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)

WhatsApp us

What’s The Difference Between An Article, A Paper, And An Essay? (Detailed Analysis)

School and college life revolves around different types of writing, including opinion articles, review articles, research papers, and essays. Each of these has a different length, structure, and level of research.

You can write articles on various topics and niches if you gather enough information. It is possible to format an interview into an article so that it can be published in a magazine or online publication.

A paper, on the other hand, is longer than an essay or article, and one must follow a specific sequence. There is an abstract at the beginning, followed by a paragraph, a conclusion, and citations at the end. 

There are a few paragraphs in the essay, all of which should be transitioned smoothly. The purpose of the essay is to persuade the reader through your logic and ideas. Different types of essays require different thoughts and writing processes. 

This article is all about differentiating between an article, paper, and essay, so if it interests you, stick around while we explore these topics.   Let’s get into it .

Page Contents

What Is An Article?

Articles are read by thousands of people around the globe and are generally written to educate people about something they’re unaware of. They are either published on an online website, magazine, or newspaper.

In the article, the writer expresses his or her perspective on a certain topic. The articles, mainly, are written to make people aware of a particular topic. 

What Is A Paper? 

The purpose of writing a research paper is to fill the gaps other authors left while writing on a similar topic.

There’s a structure that one must follow while writing a paper . Before writing a paper, make sure you’ve read the relevant papers.

Another important step is knowing your audience. It’s worth noting that the papers have a different outline of the paper than the essay or article. 

Structure of the Paper 

• Introduction
• Literature review
• Methodology
• References 

Steps To Write A Paper 

• First of all, you need to pick a topic that you’re interested in. Choosing a topic you’re not interested in is never a good idea. 
• Read at least five relevant papers. There’s no need to read the papers thoroughly; you should only go through the abstract part, the introduction paragraph, and the conclusion.
• Write down the findings and gaps that you can work on. Most of your writing covers areas that other papers do not cover. 
• The paper always starts with an introduction. Your thesis statement also goes here. 
• Since the body part of a paper is almost 8 to 12 pages, you can add as many paragraphs as you want. 
• In the end, you conclude your findings and give references to the sources. 

What Is An Essay?

The word essay originates from the Latin word ‘exagium’ which refers to the presentation of the case .

An essay is all about giving a verdict on the issue after looking at all sides of the topic with an open mind. However, you need to consider all the evidence . 

Essay writing comes with tremendous benefits. It builds a habit of looking at topics from various angles. Additionally, you get an opportunity to express your opinion after thorough research. 

There are three parts to the essay: the introduction, the body, and the conclusion. 

Introduction 

One has to catch the reader’s attention from the first line of the introduction. The purpose of this is to arouse curiosity, which then leads your readers to read more.

In the introduction section, you give a little bit of an overview of the topic you’re writing about. It gives readers an insight into what’s coming next .

This would prevent most people from reading the bottom of your essay. Therefore, it’s really important to keep your audience hooked and curious.

Starting the introduction with some statistics or research findings is the best way to accomplish this. The most important thing to write in the introduction is the thesis statement. 

When writing a paragraph in the body section, it’s important to keep sentences linked with each other. They must be coherent.

There should also be backing to your ideas from some relevant studies or sources. The best way to do this is by citing quotations, statistics, and research papers.

Additionally, you should never include irrelevant data in your essay. 

The conclusion part includes a summary of the whole essay. You also write your findings or main points in this section of the essay. 

Is the Article Different From The Essay? 

There is always a thesis statement in an essay, along with reliable sources supporting the argument whereas an article solely represents your idea or opinion.

You’ll see very few articles that are written to persuade someone, while essays are only meant to persuade the readers. 

The tone and the structure of the article are indeed different from the essay. The articles are written in simple English, so users of all ages will be able to understand them.

The length of both pieces of writing also differs. There is no limit to the word count when writing an article. An essay can be as long as a page or as short as a paragraph.

It is recommended that an essay be between 1500 and 2000 words in length. 

Articles, Papers, and Essays: Differences and Similarities

• Articles, papers, and essays have different purposes in academic and professional writing.
• Articles inform readers on diverse topics. They engagingly present the author’s viewpoint. They’re often found in magazines or online platforms.
• Research papers have sections like abstracts, introductions, reviews, methodologies, findings, and conclusions. They aim to fill gaps in the literature .
• Essays look at different sides of a topic. They give a conclusion backed by facts and careful thinking.
• Articles can be long or short and can be written in many different ways. Papers need a lot of research and must sound serious and smart. Essays use smart arguments to convince people.
• These are different types of writing with different lengths, tones, and reasons for writing. Essays try to convince people of something. Papers are written to share information. Articles give people information that’s easy to understand.
• Knowing these differences is crucial. It helps you communicate well especially when you’re doing school or college work.
• There are different types of academic writing. Each type has its purpose. They each have different ways to make things easy to understand.
• When you get the little details of these types of writing, it makes it easier to understand how they work. This helps both in school and at work.

Other Articles

• Spear and a Lance-What is the difference?
• The Difference Between A High-res Flac 24/96+ and A Normal Uncompressed 16-bit CD
• What’s the Difference Between Tin Foil and Aluminum?

This device is too small

If you're on a Galaxy Fold, consider unfolding your phone or viewing it in full screen to best optimize your experience.

• Personal Finance

Entry Level vs. Executive Costco Membership: What's the Real Difference?

Published on Aug. 5, 2024

By: Cole Tretheway

• The main difference is that Executive members get a 2% annual reward, capped at $1,000.
• To recoup the extra $60 for the Executive membership, spend at least $250 a month or $3,000 a year at Costco.
• Both offer Costco access, two membership cards, and 100% satisfaction guarantees.

On the March 2024 earnings call, now-former Costco CFO Richard Galanti said 46% of members were Executive members. They pay $60 extra for Costco's premium plan. That's a shocking amount of members choosing the most expensive Costco membership. What gives?

The real difference between the Costco Gold Star and Costco Executive is the 2% reward. Executive members get a once-a-year 2% reward on all the Costco purchases they've made that year, up to $1,000. It's a solid way to make the most of your Costco membership , though it's not for everyone.

Is Executive worth the 2% back?

But hold up. The 2% discount comes with caveats. It's not like credit card rewards. You only get it as a once-per-year rewards certificate, and you need to redeem it in-person at Costco wholesale stores (at the register). You can't redeem it for cash or directly at Costco.com (but you can use it to buy a Costco Shop Card that you can use online).

You can totally combine the 2% back with a Costco credit card . But rewards are calculated separately.

How to make the most of Executive 2% back

A quick way to rack up rewards is to book travel through Costco. You can get good deals on flights, cars, and hotel stays through the travel portal.

Quick math: A single $5,000 trip could earn you $100 in Executive rewards. Plus, you can access Costco customer service if you have issues. A colleague of mine had a cruise trip get canceled, and she had Costco track down her refunds, so she didn't have to.

Hidden downsides of Executive membership

One hidden downside is Executive members don't get 2% back on gas. Costco gas stations are often a big part of your Costco spending. Costco gas is cheaper than competitors, and lines at the pumps move fast. Unfortunately, the 2% back doesn't apply here.

Another downside is you might be tempted to overspend at Costco. The logic is, you already paid for the premium membership -- might as well get the most out of it, right? While there is a point to be made here, it's easy to fall into the trap of overspending on stuff at Costco. Like, did I really need to buy 36 frozen salmon patties for myself, in one trip? No. No, I did not.

If this is you, you know the drill. The more excuses you give yourself to overspend, the more you'll overspend. A Costco Executive membership is no exception. If it becomes the thing that tips you from "good deal" into "why did I do that" territory, consider sticking with the Gold Star membership.

Executive vs. Gold Star membership perks

Executive members get 2% back in annual Costco credit and discounts on other services. Other than that, Executive and Gold Star members get the same perks.

Perks shared by all Costco members:

• Access to Costco warehouses and Costco.com
• Two membership cards per household
• 100% satisfaction guarantee

If you feel as if you're not getting your money's worth, you can call Costco and ask to have your membership refunded. Costco Reddit users say Costco actually follows through here. If you don't earn enough from an Executive membership and want to downgrade, you can, and Costco will even refund you the difference between the rewards you earned and the additional membership cost. If you only earned $40 in rewards, Costco will refund you the additional $20 to make you whole on the upgraded membership cost.

Costco has a stellar reputation for excellent customer service. Chances are, you'll get what you need from a membership at Costco . Do you spend $250 per month or more at Costco? If so, it may be worth splurging on an Executive membership. You could get your extra money back with your Costco spending.

Alert: our top-rated cash back card now has 0% intro APR until 2025

This credit card is not just good – it’s so exceptional that our experts use it personally. It features a lengthy 0% intro APR period, a cash back rate of up to 5%, and all somehow for no annual fee! Click here to read our full review for free and apply in just 2 minutes.

Our Research Expert

Cole Tretheway is a full-time personal finance writer whose articles have been featured on The Ascent and The Motley Fool. He has a degree in English with a Certificate in Professional and Technical Communication from California Polytechnic University, SLO.

Share this page

We're firm believers in the Golden Rule, which is why editorial opinions are ours alone and have not been previously reviewed, approved, or endorsed by included advertisers. The Ascent, a Motley Fool service, does not cover all offers on the market. The Ascent has a dedicated team of editors and analysts focused on personal finance, and they follow the same set of publishing standards and editorial integrity while maintaining professional separation from the analysts and editors on other Motley Fool brands.

Related Articles

By: Cole Tretheway | Published on June 7, 2024

By: Lyle Daly | Published on June 5, 2024

By: Christy Bieber | Published on June 5, 2024

By: Lyle Daly | Published on June 4, 2024

The Ascent is a Motley Fool service that rates and reviews essential products for your everyday money matters.

Copyright © 2018 - 2024 The Ascent. All rights reserved.

A Case-Control Study of Differences in the Review Process between Peer Review and Other Research Manuscripts

6 Pages Posted: 7 Aug 2024

Aliakbar Akbaritabar

Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research

Dimity Stephen

German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies

Date Written: September 12, 2023

Science of science using bibliometric databases and methods has identified a specific set of studies dealing with peer review as their main topic. A unique feature of this field is the unity of the subject and object of study. It means a reviewer may find themselves reviewing a manuscript that directly examines the peer review system, i.e., the process they are undertaking. Priming, a well-established concept in psychology, describes the process by which the exposure of a person to a stimulus unconsciously influences their subsequent behaviour. For example, individuals exposed to words typically associated with elderly people were subsequently more likely to walk slowly and perform poorly on memory tests4. Priming can have a powerful influence, both positively and negatively, on a range of behaviours, such as volunteering, health and financial decision-making, and habit formation. This priming effect has been proven to affect scientists’ behaviour in remembering the works they have cited and the impact they attribute to them after receiving additional quantitative information about their impact. In the context of peer review, this raises the question as to whether the exposure of the reviewer to a manuscript examining peer review influences their reviewing behaviour, such as by priming them to review more rigorously than they otherwise would have, had the manuscript not reminded them of the key features, criteria, or potential flaws in the peer review system. Potential evidence of a priming effect on the peer review process might be seen in higher non-publication rates of peer review studies than studies on other topics. For instance, 39% of 504 peer review-related biomedical studies presented at an international conference until 2009 were not published by 2013, compared to the 29% of 585 registered medical trials completed in 2009 that remained unpublished in 2013. The Peer Review Workbench presents an opportunity to more systematically investigate a potential priming effect of meta-research on peer review behaviour. As such, we propose to investigate whether studies of peer review undergo a more rigorous peer review process, represented by longer review times and less favourable reviewer recommendations and publication decisions, than studies of other topics. We propose a case-control study in which we compare the peer review process and outcomes of an observation group of manuscripts related to peer review, i.e. peer review research, and a control group of manuscripts dealing with other topics, i.e. other research. Our dependent variables are the reviewers’ accept/reject recommendations, the overall publication decision, the number of rounds of revision, and the length of the process from submission to decision using Peer Review Workbench data of ICSR. We will also control for author, reviewer and editor attributes in our statistical analyses to see if the difference between the peer review research and other research groups is still substantial after accounting for these attributes. This research potentially deals with the ICSR theme of “Research practices” and could help us understand whether a negative feedback loop, i.e., a vicious circle, is at work discouraging scholars from studying peer review due to a more lengthy and exacting review process that may dissuade them from making further contributions to our knowledge in this area. Both authors of this proposal have experience in quantitative science studies, especially peer review as a theme, and our expertise suits the proposed research. From the metadata provided through the Peer Review Workbench, we would identify the observation group via the inclusion of the term “peer review” in the keywords of both accepted and rejected submissions. Manuscripts that were desk-rejected will be excluded as this decision may reflect issues unrelated to the quality of the manuscript, such as poor alignment with the scope of the journal, and offers no insight into the peer review process. We would also examine the manuscripts’ abstracts, where available, to ensure the accurate allocation of publications to the observation group and check whether the results of the two sets using these more fine-grained metadata differ substantially from the group assignments done solely through keywords (i.e., rejected or accepted). We will select a control group based on a random selection of articles of similar characteristics that do not study topics related to peer review. These characteristics could include article type (empirical research vs. informational), subject area classification, publication year, number of authors, and journal impact factor conditional on availability. We will explore the possibility to link and complement the Peer Review Workbench data using a search for the title, DOI or similar in bibliometric databases (we already have access to the mostly used databases) in case this will not be against the Workbench procedures and will not compromise the anonymity of review data. We do understand if this is not possible and will follow Workbench’s guidelines precisely. Upon analysing the selected variables described above, we will provide a descriptive analysis for the two publication groups, including sample sizes, the distribution of the rounds of revision involved, the length of review and decision processes, and publication outcomes. In one set of models, we will use logistic regression with the decision (accept/reject) as the dependent variable and the group assignment (observation/control) as the main independent variable to compare our peer review and other research groups. We will also include control variables based on the author, editor and reviewers’ attributes reshaped into each manuscript level (e.g., the authorship team is mixed-gender versus single gender, and similarly, the group of reviewers were mixed- or single-gender). In a second set of models, we will use the length of submission to decision as the dependent variable with the same set of independent and control variables to see if differences in decision time are observable between groups. Further, we would compare the ratio of accepted to rejected peer review studies with the overall accept/reject ratio of the publishing journal, and the ratio for peer review studies versus all other articles in the journal. This would provide additional data for any evidence of differences in outcomes between peer review and other research topics. However, as we understand the journals will be anonymised, if the journal code is not sufficient for such an analysis, we would ask assistance from the Workbench staff to identify the journals’ ratios or all publications related to a journal to make this calculation while maintaining anonymity. The results of this research will be submitted to journals dealing with peer review as a topic, e.g., Science Advances, Nature Scientific Reports, Journal of Informetrics, Quantitative Science Studies, Scientometrics, and similar, and also will be presented at relevant international conferences e.g., ISSI, STI and IC2S2.

Keywords: Peer Review Workbench; ICSR Lab

Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation

Aliakbar Akbaritabar (Contact Author)

Max planck institute for demographic research ( email ), german centre for higher education research and science studies ( email ).

Schützenstraße 6a Berlin, 10117 Germany

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics, related ejournals, educational impact & evaluation research ejournal.

Subscribe to this free journal for more curated articles on this topic

Log in using your username and password

• Search More Search for this keyword Advanced search
• Latest content
• Current issue
• BMJ Journals

You are here

• Online First
• Implications of child poverty reduction targets for public health and health inequalities in England: a modelling study between 2024 and 2033
• Article Text
• Article info
• Citation Tools
• Rapid Responses
• Article metrics

• http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8649-6913 Ronan McCabe 1 ,
• http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7286-8106 Roxana Pollack 1 ,
• Philip Broadbent 1 ,
• http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3060-939X Rachel M Thomson 1 ,
• http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2863-4983 Erik Igelström 1 ,
• http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0085-5263 Anna Pearce 1 ,
• http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1294-6851 Clare Bambra 2 ,
• http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3480-6566 Davara Lee Bennett 3 ,
• http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3533-3238 Alexiou Alexandros 3 ,
• http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4573-4628 Konstantinos Daras 3 ,
• http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5828-7724 David Taylor-Robinson 3 ,
• http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4208-9475 Benjamin Barr 3 ,
• http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6593-9092 Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi 1
• 1 MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit , University of Glasgow , Glasgow , UK
• 2 Population Health Sciences Institute , Newcastle University Institute for Health and Society , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK
• 3 Public Health, Policy & Systems , University of Liverpool , Liverpool , UK
• Correspondence to Dr Ronan McCabe, MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TB, UK; ronan.mccabe{at}glasgow.ac.uk

Background We investigated the potential impacts of child poverty (CP) reduction scenarios on population health and health inequalities in England between 2024 and 2033.

Methods We combined aggregate local authority-level data with published and newly created estimates on the association between CP and the rate per 100 000 of infant mortality, children (aged <16) looked after, child (aged <16) hospitalisations for nutritional anaemia and child (aged <16) all-cause emergency hospital admissions. We modelled relative, absolute (per 100 000) and total (per total population) annual changes for these outcomes under three CP reduction scenarios between 2024 and 2033— low-ambition (15% reduction), medium-ambition (25% reduction) and high-ambition (35% reduction)—compared with a baseline CP scenario (15% increase). Annual changes were aggregated between 2024 and 2033 at national, regional and deprivation (IMD tertiles) levels to investigate inequalities.

Results All CP reduction scenarios would result in substantial improvements to child health. Meeting the high-ambition reduction would decrease total cases of infant mortality (293; 95% CI 118 to 461), children looked after (4696; 95% CI 1987 to 7593), nutritional anaemia (458, 95% CI 336 to 574) and emergency admissions (32 650; 95% CI 4022 to 61 126) between 2024 and 2033. Northern regions (eg, North East) exhibited the greatest relative and absolute benefit. The most deprived tertile would experience the largest relative, absolute and total benefit; under high-ambition reduction, total infant mortality cases were predicted to fall by 126 (95% CI 51 to 199) in the most deprived tertile compared with 71 (95% CI 29 to 112) in the least between 2024 and 2033.

Conclusions Achieving reductions in CP could substantially improve child health and reduce health inequalities in England.

• INEQUALITIES
• CHILD HEALTH

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. Alternatively, the data is also available through the place-based longitudinal data resource: https://pldr.org/ .

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See:  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2024-222313

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions.

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC

Child poverty is a key determinant of population health and health inequalities.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

Child poverty is responsive to policy. We are the first to explore the health impact of meeting hypothetical future child poverty targets in England between 2024 and 2033. We show that reducing child poverty across this period would substantially improve child health and reduce health inequalities.

HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY

We demonstrate the importance of renewed policy efforts to reduce child poverty.

Child poverty is a key determinant of population health and health inequalities. 1 Experiencing child poverty is associated with worse outcomes across a wide range of early years health indicators, with evidence suggesting that these associations are often causal. 2–4 Child poverty also likely reinforces the clustering and accumulation of adverse exposures. 5 Government policy exerts a major influence over rates of child poverty. For example, higher levels of social spending were associated with lower levels of child poverty across European countries in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, whereas countries such as the UK that have enacted high levels of austerity following the crisis—including retrenchment of social spending and local government budgets—have exhibited worse trends in child health outcomes. 6–9

In the UK, progress had been made in reducing child poverty with the ‘New Labour’ Government (1997–2010) introducing several policies under the aim of being “(…) the first generation to end child poverty (in the UK)”. 10 These included targeted measures to supplement income such as the Child Tax Credit and increases in Child Benefit, alongside other measures to improve early years services such as Sure Start programmes. 10 11 Consequently, relative child poverty (before housing costs, BHC) declined from 27% to 20% across this period (a 25.9% reduction) 12 ; corresponding declines in infant mortality rates were observed, particularly in the most deprived areas. 13 However, following the 2008 financial crash and the subsequent enactment of austerity measures by consecutive Conservative-led Governments since 2010, child poverty levels began rising from 17% in 2014 to 23% (BHC) in 2020. 12 This period coincided with a rise in infant mortality. 9 Child poverty is responsive to policy; levels fell to 19% in 2021 following a brief uplift in social spending which was withdrawn by the end of that same year, with levels rising back to 22% in 2023. 12 14 The UK also exhibits wide geographical variation in child poverty levels and its devolved governments have (although limited) powers to influence levels; for example, in 2021, the Scottish Government introduced the weekly Scottish Child Payment for low-income parents/carers, although the impact of this policy on child poverty has not been evaluated yet. 15 16 The societal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the ongoing ‘cost of living’ crisis have heightened concerns about the level of child poverty in the UK and its current and future impact on child health. 17–21 While some broad measures have been taken by the UK Government in response to this situation, there has been a lack of policy explicitly addressing rising child poverty—such as removing the ‘two-child limit’ and ‘benefit cap’ on financial support. 22 Similarly, the UK Government’s initiative to ‘level up’ regional inequalities makes no reference to child poverty, despite the wide regional variations in child poverty rates. 16 23 As such, it is important to understand how levels of child poverty could change under different hypothetical policy scenarios and the likely consequences these scenarios would have for child health.

We therefore aimed to investigate the potential impact of meeting different child poverty reduction scenarios on child health outcomes and inequalities in England over the next decade. We selected four child health outcomes which are associated with poverty and deprivation in childhood and for which there were local authority-level data available in England: (1) infant mortality; (2) children (<16 years old) entering local authority care; (3) child (<16 years old) hospital admissions for nutritional anaemia; and (4) child (<16 years old) all-cause emergency hospital admissions. 9 13 24–27 While children entering care is not a direct measure of health, it is associated with a range of short-term and long-term adverse health consequences. 24

Study setting and design

We created a dynamic policy simulation model using aggregated local authority-level data from England. This model allows for the exploration of ex-ante policy impacts under different scenarios between 2024 and 2033, drawing on existing data and published evidence of the relationship between child poverty and health outcomes. 28

This ecological study used data for 145 English upper-tier local authorities (UTLAs). We excluded four UTLAs due to either small population size or irreconcilable boundary changes over the study period (City of London, Isles of Scilly, Bournemouth, Christchurch, and Poole and Dorset) 24 and two further UTLAs due to a lack of published outcome data (Buckinghamshire and Northamptonshire). Exposure data on relative child poverty were acquired from the children in low-income families (CiLIF) statistics, compiled by the Department of Work and Pensions and His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs. 29 Outcome data for infant mortality were derived from the Office for National Statistics (ONS). 30 Data for looked-after children were obtained from the UK Government’s Department of Education, 31 and local authority-level data on the number of hospitalisations for nutritional anaemia and all-cause emergency admissions were derived from NHS Hospital Episode Statistics data and supplied by the University of Liverpool’s Place-Based Longitudinal Data Resource (PLDR). 32 Data on local authority-level income deprivation were derived from the 2019 Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), using the local authority average rank. 33

We used the prevalence of relative child poverty BHC, captured in the CiLIF statistics, as our study exposure. This was defined as the proportion of children <16 years old living in families with an income of <60% of the contemporary national median income BHC. We used the 2020 CiLIF estimate to project annual values forward until the study end date in 2033 for each UTLA (see ‘modelled scenarios’ below); while estimates have subsequently been published until 2023, these are at present provisional.

We examined four outcome measures at UTLA level: infant mortality, defined as the total number of deaths under the age of one per 100 000 live births per year; children looked after, defined as the total number of children (<16 years old) entering local authority care (whose care had been with local authorities for >24 hours period) per 100 000 of the <16 population per year; total child (<16 years old) hospitalisations for nutritional anaemia per 100 000 of the <16 population per year; and total child (<16 years old) all-cause emergency admissions per 100 000 of the <16 population per year. The final available values (numerator and denominator) for each outcome—2021 for infant mortality and children looked after, and 2019 for nutritional anaemias and emergency admissions—were held constant until start of the intervention period in 2024 (see online supplemental data ).

Supplemental material

Data analysis, effect estimates.

We calculated additional cases attributable to changes in child poverty for each scenario using separate effect estimates for each outcome. For infant mortality and looked-after children, we used published estimates. For the former, we used an estimate from a time trends analysis of local authority-level data in England between 2000 and 2017, where a one-point change in the prevalence of child poverty was associated with a change in infant mortality of 5.8 (95% CI 2.4 to 8.9) deaths per 100 000 live births. 9 For the latter, we used an estimate from a longitudinal ecological analysis of local authority-level data in England between 2015 and 2020, where a one-point change in the prevalence of child poverty was associated with a change in children looked after of 5.2 (95% CI 2.2 to 8.3) children per 100 000 children <16 years old. 24

For nutritional anaemia and emergency admissions, we did not find relevant estimates in the published literature. Instead, we derived estimates for each outcome from new analysis of annual local authority-level data from the PLDR 32 between 2015 and 2019. Estimates were derived using linear within-between regression analysis, in line with similar studies. 24 This approach uses the strengths of both fixed and random effects models, integrating information on differences between and across areas. We found that a one-point change in the prevalence of child poverty was associated with 0.53 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.67) and 37.7 (95% CI 3.8 to 72.1) additional cases per 100 000 children <16 years old for nutritional anaemia and emergency admissions, respectively.

Modelled policy scenarios

We modelled a baseline child poverty scenario as a logarithmic annual increase (ie, curvilinear with a falling rate of change over time) from the 2020 prevalence of child poverty for each UTLA, resulting in a total cumulative increase of 15% from 2020 to 2033. This formed the baseline scenario to which the effects of other scenarios were compared (see below); that is, we were interested in modelling the potential effects of successful action to reduce child poverty versus unsuccessful or no action. Using the 2023 baseline prevalence of child poverty, we then modelled three scenarios at UTLA level over a 10-year period from 2024 until 2033 (see table 1 ): (1) low ambition reduction, a cumulative exponential decrease (ie, increasing rate of change over time) in child poverty of 15% on 2023 levels between 2027 and 2033 (3-year delay); (2) medium ambition reduction, a cumulative exponential decrease of 25% on 2023 levels between 2026 and 2033 (2-year delay); and (3) high ambition reduction, a cumulative exponential decrease of 35% on 2023 levels between 2025 and 2033 (1-year delay). We understood these scenarios to be realistic in light of the 26% fall in prevalence previously observed in the UK between 1997 and 2010 under previous governments. 34 All scenarios were created using MS Excel (see online supplemental data ).

• View inline

Descriptive statistics for baseline exposure and outcomes, derived from modelled projections

Modelling approach

We calculated the annual number of attributable (avoided or added) cases at UTLA level for each outcome under each scenario: the annual relative change in child poverty (%) multiplied by the effect size per number exposed in that same year. We used a Monte Carlo approach to randomly sample (1000 iterations) from the distribution of the effect size of child poverty for each health outcome based on its mean and SE, taking the median of the sample to determine the point estimate of attributable cases, and the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles for the upper and lower CIs. For each scenario compared with baseline, we report the change in cases for each outcome as the (1) total change per individuals exposed, (2) absolute change, as the risk difference (RD) per 100 000 exposed, and (3) relative change, as risk ratio (RR) at local authority level, regional level, national level and by IMD tertiles across the whole intervention period (2024–2033). Both RR and RD account for differences in population size and are thus suitable for comparison, but only compare extreme categories of the distribution. To quantify effects on inequalities in outcomes taking account for the whole distribution of deprivation, we estimated absolute and relative changes, respectively, as the difference in slope index of inequality (SII) and ratio of relative index of inequality (RII) under each scenario compared with baseline (see online supplemental appendix 1 for details). 35 The SII can be interpreted as the difference in the rate of outcomes between the hypothetically most and least deprived local authorities, whereas the RII can be interpreted as the ratio between those local authorities.

Across the 145 UTLAs included in analysis, the population-weighted mean prevalence of child poverty in 2023 projected under the baseline scenario was 20.7% ( table 1 ). At regional level, the prevalence of child poverty was typically higher in northern regions compared with southern, with the North East having the highest median prevalence at 27.6% (IQR=4.2) and the South East and South West both had the lowest at 15.4% (IQR=8.5–6.7, respectively) in 2023. Across IMD tertiles, the median prevalence was 27.8% (IQR=10.1) in the most deprived tertile and 13.9% (IQR=4.6) in the least deprived tertile. Cases per 100 000 in 2023 are given for each outcome in table 2 , with emergency admission being the most frequent and hospitalisations for nutritional anaemia being the least. For each outcome, cases tended to be highest in regions with high child poverty. Outcome trends (cases per 100 000 exposed) at national level over the period for which official data were available (2015–2019) are presented in online supplemental appendix 2 figure A : admissions fluctuated across this period although were rising 2017–2019, hospitalisations for nutritional anaemia continued rising, and infant mortality and children looked after both fell from 2017 onwards.

Modelled relative and absolute changes (95% CI) under three child poverty reduction scenarios between 2024 and 2033, relative to a baseline scenario of increasing child poverty

Modelled changes

Increasingly ambitious scenarios corresponded to greater relative and absolute beneficial effects, with effect sizes in the high-ambition policy target around twice that of the low-ambition target across all outcome measures at all levels of aggregation ( tables 2 and 3 , online supplemental appendix 2 tables A,B ).

Modelled relative and absolute changes by Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) tertile and change in Slope Index of Inequality (SII) under three child poverty reduction scenarios between 2024 and 2033, relative to a baseline scenario of increasing child poverty

Between 2024 and 2033 across England, compared with baseline, we anticipate a reduction in: infant mortality of 1.6% (293 avoided cases, 95% CI 118 to 461) under the high-ambition scenario versus 0.9% (155 avoided cases, 95% CI 62 to 244) under the low-ambition scenario; children looked after of 2% (4696 avoided cases, 95% CI 1987 to 7593) versus 1% (2483 avoided cases, 95% CI 1051 to 4015); hospitalisations for nutritional anaemia of 4.1% (458 avoided cases, 95% CI 336 to 574) versus 2.2% (242 avoided cases, 95% CI 177 to 304); and emergency admissions of 0.4% (32 650 avoided cases, 95% CI 4022 to 34 126) versus 0.2% (17 266 avoided cases, 95% CI 2127 to 32 324) ( table 2 and online supplemental appendix 2 table A ).

At regional level, estimated absolute reductions were typically higher in the north and west of England (eg, North East, West Midlands and Yorkshire and The Humber) compared with the south (see table 2 ); this pattern is highlighted in figures 1 and 2 for cases of emergency admissions avoided per 100 000 compared with baseline under the high-ambition scenario. Between 2024 and 2033, for all child poverty reduction scenarios, we anticipate cases avoided (compared with baseline) per 100 000 would be largest in the North East for all outcomes and smallest in the South East ( table 2 ). Under the high-ambition scenario, estimated total avoided cases in the North East would be 18 (95% CI 7 to 28) for infant mortality, 298 (95% CI 126 to 482) for children looked after, 29 (95% CI 21 to 36) for nutritional anaemias, and 2070 (95% CI 255 to 3876) for emergency admissions ( online supplemental appendix 2 table A ). Regional patterns of relative change were less uniform ( table 2 ), while total cases avoided were typically highest in regions with greater population size (eg, London) ( online supplemental appendix 2 table A ). At local authority level across reduction scenarios, absolute changes per 100 000 were highest in Middlesborough, Oldham, Bradford and Birmingham for all outcome measures (see online supplemental data ); this is visually displayed for emergency admissions in figures 1 and 2 .

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Absolute changes in avoided cases of emergency admissions (per 100 000) for the high ambition scenario (compared to baseline) at local authority level. Grey areas represent excluded local authorities.

Absolute changes in avoided cases of emergency admissions (per 100 000) for the high ambition scenario (compared to baseline) at region level.

Considering deprivation level, anticipated reductions on the difference scale (per 100 000) compared with baseline were highest in the most deprived tertile of UTLAs for all outcome measures (see table 3 ). Under the high-ambition scenario, this equated to a total avoided cases of 126 (95% CI 51 to 199) in the most deprived versus 71 (95% CI 29 to 112) in the least for infant mortality, 1907 (95% CI 807 to 3083) versus 1199 (95% CI 507 to 1939) for children looked after, 189 (95% CI 137 to 234) versus 117 (95% CI 86 to 146) for nutritional anaemias and 13 302 (95% CI 1639 to 24 903) versus 8 322 (95% CI 1025 to 15 581) for emergency admissions ( online supplemental appendix 2 table B ); total avoided cases under each scenario for each outcome measure are shown in figure 3 . Changes on the ratio scale followed a broadly similar pattern ( table 3 ). Greater reductions in child poverty were associated with greater reductions in absolute (SII difference) and relative (RII ratio) inequalities ( table 3 and online supplemental appendix 2 table C , respectively).

Estimated total avoided cases of four health outcomes under low, medium and high poverty reduction scenarios by Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD tertile), 2024-2033.

Reducing child poverty will likely improve a range of child health outcomes and reduce health inequalities if similar or larger declines to those observed between 1997 and 2010 were achieved. We estimated relative, absolute and total changes in infant mortality, children looked after, nutritional anaemias and all-cause emergency admissions using local authority-level data in England under three different child poverty reduction scenarios between 2024 and 2033 compared with a baseline scenario of increasing child poverty. Achieving an ambitious but realistic reduction of 35% on 2023 levels would be expected to result in avoiding a total of 293 infant deaths, 4696 children entering care, 458 childhood admissions with nutritional anaemias and 32 650 childhood emergency admissions. These reductions would likely translate into significant savings for, and relieve pressure on, local authorities (in relation to children looked after) and health services. Benefits are likely to be greatest in the most disadvantaged areas, helping efforts to ‘level up’. Other health impacts that we have not been able to quantify are also likely.

We used administrative data from trusted sources and outcome estimates from previous empirical studies where available. Our modelling approach was simple and transparent, relying on a limited set of assumptions and a realistic baseline scenario (eg, we predicted mean relative child poverty BHC at 20.7%, whereas the provisional CiLif estimate for 2023 gives 20.1%). 29 However, there are limitations to this work. We focused here on a limited set of outcomes which capture different dimensions of child health and for which there were data readily available. However, future work could extend this analysis to look at other common child health outcomes such as obesity and mental health which are both associated with child poverty. 36 37 Relatedly, we used emergency admissions as a health outcome but acknowledge that they can be affected by health service access (changes in admission practice, transport, etc). Nonetheless, our analyses to parameterise the model excluded the COVID-19 pandemic when changes in practice were most likely to be problematic. We adopted the exposure of relative child poverty rate BHC. However, findings may have differed with alternative measures of child poverty such as absolute rates and rates after housing costs. Additionally, our analyses are predicated on the associations between child poverty and health outcomes accurately reflecting causal effects. While our analyses of changes within local authorities account for time-invariant confounding, risks of residual confounding remain. It is also possible that the effect estimates we observed for each outcome could differ as a consequence of the differing time periods for which data were available. Shorter time periods may lead to underestimated effect sizes within panel data analyses. 38 This might imply our estimates of the impacts on emergency admissions and nutritional anaemia are underestimated. Relatedly, it is possible that the relationship between child poverty and outcomes does not exhibit the linear dose–response relationship that we have assumed here. A few local authorities were excluded due to small numbers, with possible consequences for overall estimates. Finally, our analyses are based on aggregate (ecological) data which could be subject to the ecological fallacy; although, while individual-level data analyses are of interest, these may be subject to the atomistic fallacy (ie, addressing child poverty could have positive impacts for communities beyond the individual). 39 Aggregate data meant that we were also unable to account for variation within and between local authorities in the mechanisms influencing child poverty—for example, the depth of child poverty might differ and the health effects of addressing severe child poverty might differ from addressing less severe poverty. Furthermore, different policies to reduce child poverty (such as minimum wages, tax credits, welfare benefits) might have quite heterogenous effects that we do not distinguish. We would anticipate the impacts of the above factors to result in our estimates being conservative.

To our knowledge, this study is the first to explore the potential impacts of future child poverty reductions on a range of child health outcomes in England. It builds on previous empirical work that has highlighted the consequences of child poverty on outcomes such as infant mortality and children looked after in England. 9 13 24 For example, this research found that reductions in child poverty in the UK between 1997 and 2010 led to a reduction in infant mortality, while subsequent increases in child poverty led to increases in infant mortality. 9 13 Tying into factors influencing child poverty, previous studies have also found associations between increased local authority spending in England and reductions in hospital admissions for nutritional anaemia, although this association lacked precision among those <14 years old (rate ratio=0.97, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.05). 40 Similarly, a study using local authority data by the Nuffield Trust showed that, in 2015/2016, the number of emergency admissions was higher with increasing deprivation among those <14 years old. 26

We highlight that if policy-makers were to set and achieve child poverty targets for England—for example, through suggested measures such as removing the two-child limit and benefit cap 22 —this would likely improve child health, particularly among the most socioeconomically disadvantaged and ‘level up’ regional inequalities.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication.

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

Acknowledgments.

For the purpose of open access, the author(s) have applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

• Whitehead M , et al
• Wickham S ,
• Barr B , et al
• Kelly-Irving M , et al
• Spencer N , et al
• Broadbent P ,
• Pearce A , et al
• Taylor-Robinson D ,
• Wickham S , et al
• Piachaud D ,
• Sutherland H
• UK Government Department for Work and Pensions
• Robinson T ,
• Norman PD , et al
• Ray-Chaudhuri S ,
• Social Security Scotland
• Lee AC , et al
• Hefferon C ,
• Bennett D , et al
• Uthayakumar-Cumarasamy A
• Thomson R ,
• Kopasker D , et al
• Taylor-Robinson DC ,
• Riordan R ,
• Ford J , et al
• University of York Cost of Living Research Group
• UK Government
• Bennett DL ,
• Schlüter DK ,
• Melis G , et al
• Arghavani H ,
• Issah A , et al
• Kossarova L ,
• Hargreaves D , et al
• Murray ET ,
• Maughan B , et al
• Zucchelli E ,
• Office for National Statistics (ONS)
• UK Government Department for Education
• ↵ Place-based logitudinal data resource . 2024 . Available : https://pldr.org/
• National statistics
• Moreno-Betancur M ,
• Latouche A ,
• Menvielle G , et al
• National statistics (UK)
• Roos JM , et al
• Diez-Roux AV
• Jenkins R ,
• Mason KE , et al

Supplementary materials

Supplementary data.

This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

• Data supplement 1
• Data supplement 2
• Data supplement 3

X @roxana_pollack, @Rachel_Thomson, @igelstorm, @ProfBambra, @benj_barr2, @vkatikireddi

BB and SVK contributed equally.

RM and RP contributed equally.

Contributors RM serves as guarantor for this study. SVK and BB conceptualised the study. RM, RP, DLB, AA and KD were involved in data curation. RP, EI, RMT and PB contributed to analysis code. RM finalised analysis code, conducted formal analyses and visualised findings. RM, RP, AP and SVK wrote the original draft. All authors were involved in the review and editing of the original draft.

Funding RM, RP, EI, RMT, AP and SVK declare funding from the Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00022/2) and the Scottish Government’s Chief Scientists Office (SPHSU17). CB declares funding from the Wellcome Trust (221266/Z/20/Z). AP declares funding from the Wellcome Trust (205412/Z/16/Z). SVK acknowledges funding from the European Research Council (949582). This work also received support from Population Health Improvement UK (PHI-UK), a national research network that seeks to transform health and reduce inequalities through change at the population level. UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) funding for the PHI-UK Policy Modelling for Health theme(s) is gratefully acknowledged [grant reference MR/Y030656/1].

Map disclaimer The depiction of boundaries on this map does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of BMJ (or any member of its group) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, jurisdiction or area or of its authorities. This map is provided without any warranty of any kind, either express or implied.

Competing interests None declared.

Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

Read the full text or download the PDF:

• Skip to main content
• Skip to search
• Skip to footer

Products and Services

Cisco Security

Master your goals. innovate. we'll tackle threats..

Get powerful security across all your networks, cloud, endpoints, and email to protect everything that matters, from anywhere.

If it's connected, you're protected

Cisco Security “The Hacker”

More connected users and devices creates more complexity. Cisco Security Cloud makes security easier for IT and safer for everyone anywhere security meets the network.

Deliver smarter, stronger security

Protect your organization across a multicloud environment, while simplifying security operations, improving scalability, and driving data-informed outcomes, powered by Cisco Talos.

Unlock better user experiences

Create a seamless experience that frustrates attackers, not users, by granting access from any device, anywhere, and adding more proactive security controls.

Deliver cost-effective defenses

Improve ROI by consolidating vendors, reducing complexity and integrating your security.

Strengthen security resilience

Unified, end-to-end protection maximizes value, minimizes risk, and closes security gaps everywhere to defend against evolving threats. Protect access, apps, and innovation across your network to secure your future.

Cisco Secure Firewall

Better visibility and actionable insights across networks, clouds, endpoints, and email allows users to respond confidently to the most sophisticated threats at machine scale.

Featured security products

Cisco hypershield.

A new groundbreaking security architecture that makes hyperscaler technology accessible to enterprises of all sizes and delivers AI-native security for modern data centers and cloud.

Cisco Secure Access (SSE)

A converged cybersecurity solution, grounded in zero trust, that radically reduces risk and delights both end users and IT staff by safely connecting anything to anywhere.

Detect the most sophisticated threats sooner across all vectors and prioritize by impact for faster responses.

Cisco Multicloud Defense

Gain multidirectional protection across clouds to stop inbound attacks, data exfiltration, and lateral movement.

Secure applications and enable frictionless access with strong MFA and more. Establish user and device trust, gain visibility into devices, and enable secure access to all apps.

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)

Simplify highly secure network access control with software-defined access and automation.

Security Suites delivered by Cisco Security Cloud

Cisco User Protection Suite

Get secure access to any application, on any device, from anywhere. Defend against threats targeting users and deliver seamless access for hybrid work.

Cisco Cloud Protection Suite

Secure your apps and data with a powerful, flexible framework for a hybrid and multicloud world.

Cisco Breach Protection Suite

Secure your business by investigating, prioritizing, and resolving incidents through unified defense and contextual insights from data-backed, AI-powered security.

Customer stories and insights

Global partnerships fight to end child exploitation together.

"Marriott has long championed human rights and human trafficking awareness. Combating CSAM is an important extension of that work. The IWF provided the level of rigor we needed in a URL list, and Cisco's security technology provided the means to easily apply it."

Abbe Horswill, Director, Human Rights and Social Impact

Company: Marriott International

The NFL relies on Cisco

"From securing stadiums, broadcasts, and fans to protecting the largest live sporting event in America, the right tools and the right team are key in making sure things run smoothly, avoiding disruptions to the game, and safeguarding the data and devices that make mission-critical gameday operations possible."

Add value to security solutions

Cisco Security Enterprise Agreement

Instant savings

Experience security software buying flexibility with one easy-to-manage agreement.

Services for security

Let the experts secure your business

Get more from your investments and enable constant vigilance to protect your organization.

Sharpen your security insights

Cisco Cybersecurity Viewpoints

Set your vision to a more secure future with Cisco Cybersecurity Viewpoints. With specialized content from podcasts to industry news, you'll walk away with a deeper understanding of the trends, research, and topics in our rapidly changing world.

How to cite ChatGPT

Use discount code STYLEBLOG15 for 15% off APA Style print products with free shipping in the United States.

We, the APA Style team, are not robots. We can all pass a CAPTCHA test , and we know our roles in a Turing test . And, like so many nonrobot human beings this year, we’ve spent a fair amount of time reading, learning, and thinking about issues related to large language models, artificial intelligence (AI), AI-generated text, and specifically ChatGPT . We’ve also been gathering opinions and feedback about the use and citation of ChatGPT. Thank you to everyone who has contributed and shared ideas, opinions, research, and feedback.

In this post, I discuss situations where students and researchers use ChatGPT to create text and to facilitate their research, not to write the full text of their paper or manuscript. We know instructors have differing opinions about how or even whether students should use ChatGPT, and we’ll be continuing to collect feedback about instructor and student questions. As always, defer to instructor guidelines when writing student papers. For more about guidelines and policies about student and author use of ChatGPT, see the last section of this post.

Quoting or reproducing the text created by ChatGPT in your paper

If you’ve used ChatGPT or other AI tools in your research, describe how you used the tool in your Method section or in a comparable section of your paper. For literature reviews or other types of essays or response or reaction papers, you might describe how you used the tool in your introduction. In your text, provide the prompt you used and then any portion of the relevant text that was generated in response.

Unfortunately, the results of a ChatGPT “chat” are not retrievable by other readers, and although nonretrievable data or quotations in APA Style papers are usually cited as personal communications , with ChatGPT-generated text there is no person communicating. Quoting ChatGPT’s text from a chat session is therefore more like sharing an algorithm’s output; thus, credit the author of the algorithm with a reference list entry and the corresponding in-text citation.

When prompted with “Is the left brain right brain divide real or a metaphor?” the ChatGPT-generated text indicated that although the two brain hemispheres are somewhat specialized, “the notation that people can be characterized as ‘left-brained’ or ‘right-brained’ is considered to be an oversimplification and a popular myth” (OpenAI, 2023).

OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT (Mar 14 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/chat

You may also put the full text of long responses from ChatGPT in an appendix of your paper or in online supplemental materials, so readers have access to the exact text that was generated. It is particularly important to document the exact text created because ChatGPT will generate a unique response in each chat session, even if given the same prompt. If you create appendices or supplemental materials, remember that each should be called out at least once in the body of your APA Style paper.

When given a follow-up prompt of “What is a more accurate representation?” the ChatGPT-generated text indicated that “different brain regions work together to support various cognitive processes” and “the functional specialization of different regions can change in response to experience and environmental factors” (OpenAI, 2023; see Appendix A for the full transcript).

Creating a reference to ChatGPT or other AI models and software

The in-text citations and references above are adapted from the reference template for software in Section 10.10 of the Publication Manual (American Psychological Association, 2020, Chapter 10). Although here we focus on ChatGPT, because these guidelines are based on the software template, they can be adapted to note the use of other large language models (e.g., Bard), algorithms, and similar software.

The reference and in-text citations for ChatGPT are formatted as follows:

• Parenthetical citation: (OpenAI, 2023)
• Narrative citation: OpenAI (2023)

Let’s break that reference down and look at the four elements (author, date, title, and source):

Author: The author of the model is OpenAI.

Date: The date is the year of the version you used. Following the template in Section 10.10, you need to include only the year, not the exact date. The version number provides the specific date information a reader might need.

Title: The name of the model is “ChatGPT,” so that serves as the title and is italicized in your reference, as shown in the template. Although OpenAI labels unique iterations (i.e., ChatGPT-3, ChatGPT-4), they are using “ChatGPT” as the general name of the model, with updates identified with version numbers.

The version number is included after the title in parentheses. The format for the version number in ChatGPT references includes the date because that is how OpenAI is labeling the versions. Different large language models or software might use different version numbering; use the version number in the format the author or publisher provides, which may be a numbering system (e.g., Version 2.0) or other methods.

Bracketed text is used in references for additional descriptions when they are needed to help a reader understand what’s being cited. References for a number of common sources, such as journal articles and books, do not include bracketed descriptions, but things outside of the typical peer-reviewed system often do. In the case of a reference for ChatGPT, provide the descriptor “Large language model” in square brackets. OpenAI describes ChatGPT-4 as a “large multimodal model,” so that description may be provided instead if you are using ChatGPT-4. Later versions and software or models from other companies may need different descriptions, based on how the publishers describe the model. The goal of the bracketed text is to briefly describe the kind of model to your reader.

Source: When the publisher name and the author name are the same, do not repeat the publisher name in the source element of the reference, and move directly to the URL. This is the case for ChatGPT. The URL for ChatGPT is https://chat.openai.com/chat . For other models or products for which you may create a reference, use the URL that links as directly as possible to the source (i.e., the page where you can access the model, not the publisher’s homepage).

Other questions about citing ChatGPT

You may have noticed the confidence with which ChatGPT described the ideas of brain lateralization and how the brain operates, without citing any sources. I asked for a list of sources to support those claims and ChatGPT provided five references—four of which I was able to find online. The fifth does not seem to be a real article; the digital object identifier given for that reference belongs to a different article, and I was not able to find any article with the authors, date, title, and source details that ChatGPT provided. Authors using ChatGPT or similar AI tools for research should consider making this scrutiny of the primary sources a standard process. If the sources are real, accurate, and relevant, it may be better to read those original sources to learn from that research and paraphrase or quote from those articles, as applicable, than to use the model’s interpretation of them.

We’ve also received a number of other questions about ChatGPT. Should students be allowed to use it? What guidelines should instructors create for students using AI? Does using AI-generated text constitute plagiarism? Should authors who use ChatGPT credit ChatGPT or OpenAI in their byline? What are the copyright implications ?

On these questions, researchers, editors, instructors, and others are actively debating and creating parameters and guidelines. Many of you have sent us feedback, and we encourage you to continue to do so in the comments below. We will also study the policies and procedures being established by instructors, publishers, and academic institutions, with a goal of creating guidelines that reflect the many real-world applications of AI-generated text.

For questions about manuscript byline credit, plagiarism, and related ChatGPT and AI topics, the APA Style team is seeking the recommendations of APA Journals editors. APA Style guidelines based on those recommendations will be posted on this blog and on the APA Style site later this year.

Update: APA Journals has published policies on the use of generative AI in scholarly materials .

We, the APA Style team humans, appreciate your patience as we navigate these unique challenges and new ways of thinking about how authors, researchers, and students learn, write, and work with new technologies.

American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000

Related and recent

Comments are disabled due to your privacy settings. To re-enable, please adjust your cookie preferences.

APA Style Monthly

Subscribe to the APA Style Monthly newsletter to get tips, updates, and resources delivered directly to your inbox.

Welcome! Thank you for subscribing.

APA Style Guidelines

Browse APA Style writing guidelines by category

• Abbreviations
• Bias-Free Language
• Capitalization
• In-Text Citations
• Italics and Quotation Marks
• Paper Format
• Punctuation
• Research and Publication
• Spelling and Hyphenation
• Tables and Figures

Full index of topics