how was zimbardo experiment unethical

The Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted by Professor Philip Zimbardo at Stanford University in 1971 and was designed to explore the psychological impact of the prison environment on prisoners and prison guards. Although Zimbardo intended the experiment to last two weeks, it was abruptly halted after only six days due to the increasingly ...

Zimbardo's experiment was unethical due to a lack of fully informed consent, abuse of participants, and lack of appropriate debriefings. More recent findings suggest there were other significant ethical issues that compromise the experiment's scientific standing, including the fact that experimenters may have encouraged abusive behaviors.

The experiment was conducted in 1971 by psychologist Philip Zimbardo to examine situational forces versus dispositions in human behavior. 24 young, healthy, psychologically normal men were randomly assigned to be “prisoners” or “guards” in a simulated prison environment. The experiment had to be terminated after only 6 days due to the ...

Jaffe had been asked by Zimbardo to tell Mark that he was being too ‘soft’ in his treatment of prisoners: ‘The guards have to know that every guard is going to be what we call a “tough guard,”’ Jaffe insisted, because ‘the success of this experiment rides on the behavior of the guards to make it seem as realistic as possible’.

Abstract. The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) is one of psychology's most famous studies. It has been criticized on many grounds, and yet a majority of textbook authors have ignored these criticisms in their discussions of the SPE, thereby misleading both students and the general public about the study's questionable scientific validity. Data ...

The Stanford prison experiment (SPE) was a psychological experiment performed during August 1971. It was a two-week simulation of a prison environment that examined the effects of situational variables on participants' reactions and behaviors. Stanford University psychology professor Philip Zimbardo managed the research team who administered ...

Philip Zimbardo (2008) himself decided that his Stanford Prison Experiment was unethical because it violated these principles: Participants “did suffer considerable anguish . . . and [the experiment] resulted in such extreme stress and emotional turmoil that five of the 5 Code of Ethics and Conduct, guidance published by the ethics committee ...

Presents a synopsis of the Stanford prison experiment, summarizes critical arguments against the experiment, evaluates unethical aspects of the study, and considers information relative to decisions of ethicality. In answer to criticisms leveled by H. B. Savin (see PA, Vol 53:Issue 1) the absolute and relative ethical principles guiding research and human experimentation are considered. While ...

In the 1960s and 70s, psychologist Philip Zimbardo conducted several notable social psychology experiments examining how social roles and situations can impact human behavior. Zimbardo designed the Stanford Prison Experiment in 1971 to explore the psychology of imprisoning people. He aimed to study how participants reacted to being assigned ...

Introduction. The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) took place at a time when the sources of authoritarianism and evil were a focal concern in psychology. It emerged from a tradition of activist social psychological research beginning with Solomon Asch in the 1940s and extending through Stanley Milgram’s obedience experiments in the early 1960s.