Developing Critical Thinking
- Posted January 10, 2018
- By Iman Rastegari
In a time where deliberately false information is continually introduced into public discourse, and quickly spread through social media shares and likes, it is more important than ever for young people to develop their critical thinking. That skill, says Georgetown professor William T. Gormley, consists of three elements: a capacity to spot weakness in other arguments, a passion for good evidence, and a capacity to reflect on your own views and values with an eye to possibly change them. But are educators making the development of these skills a priority?
"Some teachers embrace critical thinking pedagogy with enthusiasm and they make it a high priority in their classrooms; other teachers do not," says Gormley, author of the recent Harvard Education Press release The Critical Advantage: Developing Critical Thinking Skills in School . "So if you are to assess the extent of critical-thinking instruction in U.S. classrooms, you’d find some very wide variations." Which is unfortunate, he says, since developing critical-thinking skills is vital not only to students' readiness for college and career, but to their civic readiness, as well.
"It's important to recognize that critical thinking is not just something that takes place in the classroom or in the workplace, it's something that takes place — and should take place — in our daily lives," says Gormley.
In this edition of the Harvard EdCast, Gormley looks at the value of teaching critical thinking, and explores how it can be an important solution to some of the problems that we face, including "fake news."
About the Harvard EdCast
The Harvard EdCast is a weekly series of podcasts, available on the Harvard University iT unes U page, that features a 15-20 minute conversation with thought leaders in the field of education from across the country and around the world. Hosted by Matt Weber and co-produced by Jill Anderson, the Harvard EdCast is a space for educational discourse and openness, focusing on the myriad issues and current events related to the field.
An education podcast that keeps the focus simple: what makes a difference for learners, educators, parents, and communities
Related Articles
Helping Children Succeed
Reading and the common core, roots of the school gardening movement.
Ideas and insights from Harvard Business Publishing Corporate Learning
To Improve Critical Thinking, Don’t Fall into the Urgency Trap
Too often at work, people rely on expertise and past experiences to jump to a conclusion. Yet research consistently shows that when we rush decisions, we often regret them—even if they end up being correct. [i]
Why we hasten decision making is quite clear. We’re inundated with incessant distractions that compete for our attention, and, at the same time, we’re facing profound pressure to go faster and drive our businesses forward, even when the path ahead is unclear.
In the aftermath of information overwhelm, evolving technology, and rapidly changing business environments, people often unconsciously fall into a pernicious paradox called the “urgency trap.”
The Urgency Trap
The urgency trap, which can be defined as the habitual, unbridled, and counterproductive tendencies to rush through decision making when under the pressure of too many demands, is a paradox because it limits the very thing that could help us be more innovative, efficient, and effective: Our critical thinking.
The ability to analyze and effectively break down an issue to make a decision or solve a problem in novel ways is sorely lacking in today’s workforce, with most employers reporting that their employees’ critical thinking skills are average at best. [ii]
The good news? Critical thinking is a teachable skill, and one that any person can learn to make time for when making decisions. To improve and devote time for critical thinking at work, consider the following best practices.
1. Question assumptions and biases
Consider this common scenario: A team is discussing a decision that they must make quickly. The team’s options—and the arguments for and against them—have been assembled, but no clear evidence supports a particular course of action. Under pressure to move fast, the team relies on their expertise and past experiences to rapidly provide a solution. Yet, in the months following their decision, the issues that prompted the original discussion persist, and the team wonders why.
The issue here may be that the team failed to question their own assumptions and biases. Indeed, when we view situations solely based on our own personal experiences and beliefs, we limit our options and provide solutions that are often short-sighted or superficial. [iii] To improve critical thinking skills, we must step back and ask ourselves,
- “Am I seeking out information that confirms my pre-conceived idea?”
- “Am I perceiving a past experience as more predictable than it actually was?”
- “Am I overemphasizing information that comes to mind quickly, instead of calculating other probabilities?”
2. Reason through logic
When presented with an argument, it is important to analyze it logically in order to determine whether or not it is valid. This means looking at the evidence that is being used to support the argument and determining whether or not it actually does support the conclusion that is being drawn.
Additionally, consider the source of the information. Is it credible? Trustworthy? Finally, be aware of common logical fallacies people tend to use when trying to speed up decision making, such as false dilemma (erroneously limiting available options) and hasty generalizations (making a claim based on a few examples rather than substantial proof).
3. Listen actively and openly
When we’re in a rush to make a decision, we often focus more on how we want to respond rather than what the speaker is saying. Active listening, on the other hand, is a critical thinking skill that involves paying close attention to what someone else is saying with the intent to learn, and then asking questions to clarify and deepen understanding.
When engaging in active listening, it’s important to avoid interrupting and instead allow the other person to fully express their thoughts. Additionally, resist the urge to judge or criticize what the other person is saying. Rather, focus on truly understanding their perspective. This may mean practicing open-mindedness by considering new ideas, even if they challenge existing beliefs. By keeping an open mind, this ensures that all sides of an issue are considered before coming to a conclusion.
4. Ask better questions
In an article for Harvard Business Review, John Coleman, author of the HBR Guide to Crafting Your Purpose , writes, “At the heart of critical thinking is the ability to formulate deep, different, and effective questions.” [iv]
To ask better questions, first consider the audience for the question (who is hearing the question and who might respond?) and the purpose (what is the goal of asking this question?). Then, approach queries with rigor and curiosity by asking questions that:
- Are open-ended yet short and direct (e.g., “How might you help me think about this differently?”)
- Challenge a group’s conventional thinking (e.g., “What if we tried a new approach?”)
- Help others reconsider their first principles or hypotheses (e.g., “As we look at the data, how might we reconsider our initial proposed solution?”)
- Encourage further discussion and analysis (e.g., “How can we deepen our understanding of this issue?”)
- Thoughtfully follow up on the solution (e.g., “How do we feel about the progress so far?”)
5. Create space for deliberation
The recommendations outlined thus far are behaviors and capabilities people can use in the moment, but sometimes, the best solutions are formulated after consideration. In fact, research shows that a deliberate process often leads to better conclusions. [v] And sleep has even been proven to help the brain assimilate a problem and see it more clearly. [vi]
When issues are complex, it’s important to find ways to resist unnecessary urgency. Start by mapping out a process that allows several days or longer to sit with a problem. Then, create space in the day to formulate in quiet reflection, whether that’s replacing your first thirty minutes in the morning with thinking instead of checking email, or going on a walk midday, or simply journaling for a few moments before bed.
Critical Thinking Cannot Be Overlooked
In the face of rapidly-evolving business environments, the ability to make smart decisions quickly is one of a company’s greatest assets—but to move fast, people must first slow down to reason through pressing issues, ask thoughtful questions, and evaluate a topic from multiple angles.
To learn more about how organizations can enhance their critical thinking and decision-making skills, download the full paper: Who Is Really Making the Decisions in Your Organization — and How?
[i] Grant Halvorson, Heidi, “Quick Decisions Create Regret, Even When They Are Good Decisions,” Fast Company. https://www.fastcompany.com/1758386/quick-decisions-create-regret-even-when-they-are-good-decisions .
[ii] Plummer, Matt, “A Short Guide to Building Your Team’s Critical Thinking Skills,” Harvard Business Review, October 2019. https://hbr.org/2019/10/a-short-guide-to-building-your-teams-critical-thinking-skills .
[iii] Benjamin Enke, Uri Gneezy, Brian Hall, David Martin, Vadim Nelidov, Theo Offerman, and Jeroen van de Ve, “Cognitive Biases: Mistakes or Missing Stakes?” Harvard Business School, 2021. https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/21-102_1ed838f2-8ef3-4eec-b543-d00eb1efbe10.pdf
[iv] Coleman, John, “Critical Thinking Is About Asking Better Questions,” Harvard Business Review, April 2022. https://hbr.org/2022/04/critical-thinking-is-about-asking-better-questions .
[v] Markovitz, Daniel, “How to Avoid Rushing to Solutions When Problem-Solving,” Harvard Business Review, November 2020. https://hbr.org/2020/11/how-to-avoid-rushing-to-solutions-when-problem-solving .
[vi] Miller, Jared, “Does ‘Sleeping On It’ Really Work?” WebMD. https://www.webmd.com/sleep-disorders/features/does-sleeping-on-it-really-work .
Let’s talk
Change isn’t easy, but we can help. Together we’ll create informed and inspired leaders ready to shape the future of your business.
© 2024 Harvard Business School Publishing. All rights reserved. Harvard Business Publishing is an affiliate of Harvard Business School.
- Privacy Policy
- Copyright Information
- Terms of Use
- About Harvard Business Publishing
- Higher Education
- Harvard Business Review
- Harvard Business School
We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies and revised Privacy Policy .
Cookie and Privacy Settings
We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.
The Path to Critical Thinking
by Stever Robbins
Can you write a refresher on critical thinking?
What's logic got to do with it? Nothing! We don't use logic to decide, or even to think. And a good thing, too, or the advertising industry would be dead in the water. Unfortunately, all of our decisions come from emotion. Emotional Intelligence guru Daniel Goleman explains that our brain's decision-making center is directly connected to emotions, then to logic. So, as any good salesman will tell you, we decide with emotion and justify (read: fool ourselves) with logic.
Purely emotional decision making is bad news. When insecurity, ego, and panic drive decisions, companies become toxic and may even die. Just look at all the corporate meltdowns over the last five years to quickly understand where emotional decision making can lead.
Critical thinking starts with logic. Logic is the unnatural act of knowing which facts you're putting together to reach your conclusions, and how. We're hard-wired to assume that if two things happen together, one causes the other. This lets us leap quickly to very wrong conclusions. Early studies showed that increasing light levels in factories increased productivity. Therefore, more light means more productivity? Wrong! The workers knew a study was being done, and they responded to any change by working harder, since they knew they were being measured—the Hawthorne Effect.
We also sloppily reverse cause and effect. We notice all our high performers have coffee at mid-morning, and conclude that coffee causes high performance. Maybe. Maybe not. Maybe high performers work so late and are so sleep deprived that they need coffee to wake up. Unless you want a hyper-wired workforce, it's worth figuring out what really causes what.
There are many excellent books on logic. One of my favorites is the most-excellent and most-expensive Minto Pyramid Principle by Barbara Minto. It's about logic in writing, but you can use it for any decision you want to think through in detail.
The trap of assuming You can think critically without knowing where the facts stop and your own neurotic assumptions begin. We aren't built to identify our own assumptions without lots of practice, yet the wrong assumptions are fatal.
When we don't know something, we assume. That's a fancy way of saying, "we make stuff up." And often, we don't realize we're doing it. When our best performers leave, our first (and perhaps only) response is to offer them more pay, without realizing that other motivations like job satisfaction or recognition for accomplishments might be more important.
Finding and busting "conventional wisdom" can be the key to an empire. For decades, the standard video rental store model assumed that people wanted instant gratification and, to get it, they were willing to drive to a store, pay a rental fee for a few days' access, and then drive back to the store in a few days to return the movie. Thousands of big and small video rental parlors popped up across the country using this model. But Reed Hastings challenged those assumptions. He calculated that people would trade instant gratification for delayed, and would pay a monthly fee if they could have movies mailed to them, which they could keep as long as they liked. The result? Netflix. Estimated 2005 revenue: $700 million.
Assumptions can also cripple us. A CEO confided that he never hires someone who backs into a parking space. His logic (and I use the term loosely): The person will use time at the start of the day so they can leave more quickly at the end of the day. He assumes face time equals results. In whose world? Many people tell me they get more done in an hour at home than in eight hours in an interruption-prone office. How many great employees will he miss because he's not examining his assumptions?
Some assumptions run so deep they're hard to question. Many managers can't imagine letting people work fewer hours for the same pay. "If they go home earlier, we have to pay them less." Why? "Hours = productivity" is true of assembly lines, but not knowledge work. Research shows that it's not how much you work, but the quality of the work time that drives results. 2 But in most workplaces, hours count as much as results.
Next time you're grappling with a problem, spend time brainstorming your assumptions. Get others involved—it's easier to uncover assumptions with an outside perspective. Then question the heck out of each one. You may find that one changed assumption is the difference between doing good and doing great.
The truth will set you free (statistics notwithstanding) Have you ever noticed how terrified we are of the truth? We're desperately afraid that the truth will reveal us as incompetent. Our situation really is hopeless. We really aren't as great as we pretend. So we cling to our beliefs no matter how hard the truth tries to break free.
Guess what, recording industry: Electronic downloads have changed the nature of your business. Start asking how you'll add value in a world where finding, packaging, and distributing sound is a commodity. Hey, ailing airlines: Oil's expensive, customers won't pay much, and you have huge capital costs. That hasn't stopped Southwest, Jet Blue, and others from making a fortune.
Nothing tells the truth like solid data and the guts to accept it. But it's difficult in practice. When was the last time you identified and collected data that contradicted your beliefs? If you found it, did you cheerfully change your belief, or did you explain away the data in a way that let you keep your comfortable pre-conceptions?
Here is a great exercise for your group or company. Have your general managers list your industry's Unquestioned Truths, which they then must prove with data. When a Fortune 500 CEO recently ran this exercise, Surprise! Some "absolute truths" were absolutely false. Now he can do business his competitors think is nuts. Analysts will say he's off his rocker, until his deeper knowledge of truth starts making a small fortune.
One caveat: Be picky about where you get your data. The Internet can be especially dangerous. The miracle of technology lets one bad piece of data spread far and wide, and eventually be accepted as truth.
Help! I've been framed! Not only may your data be disguised, but the whole problem itself may be disguised! It seems obvious: we're losing money, we need to cut costs. Not so fast! How you "frame" a situation—your explanation—has great power. Remember assumptions? Frames are big ol' collections of assumptions that you adopt lock, stock, and barrel. They become the map you use to explore a situation.
You're negotiating an acquisition. You're chomping at the bit. It's WAR!! Competition is all. The frame is combat!
Or, you're negotiating an acquisition. You're on a journey with the other party to find and split the value buried at the X. You still track your gains and gather intelligence, but the emphasis is on mutual outcomes, not "winning."
In a zero-sum one-time negotiation, a combat frame may be the best tool. But in a negotiation where you're free to develop creative solutions that can involve outside factors, the journey frame could work best. "Instead of $100K, why don't you pay $75K and let us share your booth at Comdex?"
Frames have great power! Presented with a potential solution to a problem and told, "This course of action has a 20 percent failure rate," few managers would approve. When that same solution is presented as having an 80 percent success rate, the same manager is going to consider it more deeply— even though a 20 percent failure rate means the same thing as an 80 percent success rate! The frame changes the decision.
Are you brave in the face of failure? Most people aren't. I recommend the responsibility frame: "What aren't we doing what we should?" The responsibility frame sends you searching for the elements of success.
The beauty is that no one frame is right, just different. The danger is when we adopt a frame without questioning it. You'll do best by trying several different frames for a situation and exploring each to extract the gems.
People are our greatest asset. Really Critical thinking isn't just about what happens in our own brains. When you're thinking critically in business, bring in other people! We don't consider the people impact in our decisions often enough. In fact, we pooh-pooh the "soft stuff." We feel safe with factors we can calculate on our HP-12B. But in truth, business is about people. Multibillion-dollar mergers fail due to culture clash.
Customers, suppliers, partners, employees. They're as much a part of your business as that sparkly new PC you use to play Solitaire. How will your decisions change their lives? Imagine being them and let your imagination change your decisions.
The Gallup organization estimates that 70 percent of America's workers are disengaged, and disengaged workers are dramatically less productive, creative, and committed than engaged workers. Yet few strategy meetings ask, "How can we engage our employees more?" It's as if we say people are our greatest asset—but we don't really believe it. If you want to improve your critical thinking, get other points of view.
A stitch in time saves nine Of course you know you should think about the consequences of your actions. But with information overload, quarterly earnings pressure, sixty-hour weeks…who has the time? We don't think much beyond the end of our nose.
But technology leverages the effects of our decisions throughout the organization and even across the globe. So good thinking demands that you consider consequences over many timeframes. Think out a month, a year, a decade, many decades. That tanning booth looks great when you consider how you'll look in a week, but is it worth looking like a leather overcoat ten years from now?
Long-term junkies like me are great at creating ten-year plans, but managing next month's cash flow? Not likely. Short-term junkies are more common; they're the ones who discount to make this quarter's numbers, while tanking the company in the process. You can do better by considering multiple timeframes.
I could go on, but there's plenty here to chew on. Think about a decision you're making, and pull in the rigor:
- Make sure you understand the logic behind your decision.
- Identify your assumptions and double-check them.
- Collect the data that will support or disprove your assumptions.
- Deliberately consider the situation from multiple frames.
- Remember the people!
- Think short and long term.
© 2005 by Stever Robbins. All rights reserved in all media.
Stever Robbins is founder and president of LeadershipDecisionworks, a consulting firm that helps companies develop leadership and organizational strategies to sustain growth and productivity over time. You can find more of his articles at http://LeadershipDecisionworks.com . He is the author of It Takes a Lot More than Attitude to Lead a Stellar Organization .
1. Yes, I know. I'm making a point. Congratulations; you got it. Color me subtle. Now go back and keep reading...
2. The Power of Full Engagement , by Tony Schwartz and Jim Loehr, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2003.
- Utility Menu
GA4 Tracking Code
bok_logo_2-02_-_harvard_left.png
- Stimulating Students to Think
Stimulating students to think can happen in one of two ways. On the first level, educators can take steps to help students ‘pick up’ the mindset of the course or discipline when they step into class. The second level involves prompting students to think beyond the surface and adopt a critical mindset.
One aspect of stimulating students to think involves prompting students to drop the concerns they walked into class with, get into the mindset of the discipline, and be receptive to learning new material. Activities such as Do Now ( http://ablconnect.harvard.edu/do-now-research ), Quick Write ( http://ablconnect.harvard.edu/quick-write ) and Games ( http://ablconnect.harvard.edu/game-research ), when used to open a class period, can be very effective warm-ups that help students transition from whatever they were doing before class to the goals and learning objectives of the class before them. Other types of activities also apply—the idea is to prime students to think within the appropriate context for the class, which helps them transition and prepares them for learning (Nilson, 2010).
A second aspect of stimulating students to think involves prompting students to think deeply and critically about material. A large literature on the importance of critical thinking within higher education exists (e.g., Abrami et al., 2008; Gibbs, 1985; McMillan, 1987; Powell, 1987; Tsui, 1998; Pithers & Sodden, 2000). Although we, as instructors, want students to develop critical thinking skills, we often think of critical thinking as an abstract goal, and we lack specific, concrete steps for turning students into critical thinkers (Kuhn, 1999). We can overcome this by thinking more deeply ourselves about what it means to think critically. Pergiovanni (2014) distills the definitions of critical thinking found in the literature into four components: 1) questioning and reasoning; 2) recognizing assumptions; 3) presenting and evaluating data; and 4) drawing conclusions (Pergiovanni, p. 86). Students often need to be explicitly taught what critical thinking looks like either in their discipline (the “infusion approach”) or in higher education generally (the “general approach”; Ennis, 1989, p. 4). In the infusion approach, exercises designed to promote critical thinking are used to teach particular subject matter in a discipline-specific way. In contrast to this, the general approach refers to efforts to train students in how to think critically that are not tied to a specific discipline or subject matter. For example, a course that is focused on improving students’ general writing abilities is taking the general approach, as students practice deepening and expressing their thoughts through writing in a manner that is not tied to any specific discipline. Writing exercises are useful in prompting students to integrate research, synthesize arguments, and think deeply about material—which are all skills that transcend specific disciplines (Bean, 2011).
Perhaps the biggest challenge for educators, in stimulating students to think, is in getting clear themselves about what constitutes good thinking. As Kuhn (1999) put it, “What does it mean to be accomplished in thinking, and how does this accomplishment manifest itself?” (p. 16). Instructors should be as clear as possible about what kind of thinking they want students to do during a particular exercise or assignment (for example, is the goal to get students to uncover and then question their assumptions? Is it to weigh various pieces of evidence and decide which kind is strongest? etc.). Research has demonstrated that students experience more learning gains when faculty share their teaching goals and the reasons behind their objectives (Winkelmes, 2013). Moreover, students may be more open to unfamiliar activities if they understand why the instructor is asking them to engage in them and what they stand to gain (Bok Center 2002/2010). Having clarified the learning objectives associated with each activity or assignment for themselves, instructors should then make their goals transparent to students.
Written by Julia Hayden Galindo, Ed.D., Harvard Graduate School of Education
References:
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M. A., Tamin, R., & Zhang, D. (2008). Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 78 (4), 1102-1134.
Bok Center (2002/2010). Twenty ways to make lectures more participatory. Retrieved September 12, 2014 from: http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/html/icb.topic58474/TFTlectures.html
- Bean, J. C. (2011). Engaging Ideas (2 nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Calrification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18 (3), 4-10.
Gibbs, E. M. (1985). Teaching critical thinking at the university level: A review of some empirical evidence. Informal Logic, 7 (2 & 3), 137-149.
Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Research, 28 (2), 16-25.
McMillan, J. H. (1987). Enhancing college students’ critical thinking: A review of studies. Research in Higher Education, 26, 3-29.
Nilson, L. B. (2010). Teaching at its best: A research-based resource for college instructors . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Piergiovanni, P. R. (2014). Creating a critical thinker. College Teaching, 62 (3), 86-93. DOI: 10.1080/87567555.2014.896775
Pithers, R. T. & Soden, R. (2000). Critical thinking in education: A review. Educational Research, 42 (3), 237-249.
Powell, S. (1987). Improving critical thinking: A review. Educational Psychology, 7 (3), 169-185.
Tsui, L. (2002). Fostering critical thinking through effective pedagogy: Evidence from four institutional case studies. Journal of Higher Education, 73 (6), 740-763.
Winkelmes, M.A. (2013). Transparency in teaching: Faculty share data and improve students’ learning. Liberal Education, 99 (2), 48-55.
Further Resources:
- Condon, W. & Kelly-Riley, D. (2004). Assessing and teaching what we value: The relationship between college-level writing and critical thinking abilities. Assessing Writing, 9 (1), 56-75.
- Glaser, E. M. (1942). An experiment in the development of critical thinking. Teachers College Record, 43 (5), 409-410.
- Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Thinking styles: Keys to understanding student performance. Phi Delta Kappan, 71 (5), 366-371.
- Authentic Learning (Simulations, Lab, Field)
- Classroom Assessment, Reflection, & Feedback
- Expanding Depth and Breadth
- Fostering Motivation
- Group & Cooperative Learning; Students as Classroom Leaders
- Revealing & Dealing with Misconceptions
- Research on Activity Types
- Additional Research
21st Century Learning
Battelle for kids p21 framework for 21st century skills.
The Battelle for Kids P21 Framework for 21st Century Skills is a framework designed to help practitioners integrate 21st century skills into the teaching of core academic subjects. It was created by the Partnership for 21st Century Learning (P21), a network of Battelle for Kids, with input from teachers, education experts, and business leaders. It focuses on the skills and knowledge needed to succeed in work, life, and citizenship in today's world.
View All Term Definitions
Breakdown by Domain
Key features, context & culture.
- Provides online professional development that helps teachers develop strategies to reach diverse students
- Acknowledges that learning occurs across all contexts, both in school and out, and from birth through career
- Provides targeted resources for personal, work, and community environments
- Outlines key characteristics of effective 21st century learning environments
Developmental Perspective
- No information or learning progression provided
Associated Outcomes
- No information provided
Available Resources
Support materials.
- Summary documents with descriptions of framework and definitions
- A self-assessment tool for measuring how well a school is implementing 21st century skills and identifying strategies for improvement
- In-depth research reports on various skills in the framework
- Videos showcasing best practices, examples of successful initiatives, lessons from the field, and more
- Blog featuring insights/learnings from educators and experts
- Guides/skill maps for integrating 21st century learning into key subject areas
- Online and on-site professional development courses
- Links to external resources related to skills in the framework such as articles, best practices, and activities, and more
Programs & Strategies
- Outlines key characteristics of effective 21st century curriculum and instruction
- General toolkits, guides, and videos for planning, implementing, and integrating 21st century learning initiatives into educational settings
- Parent guides with tips and strategies
- Provides links to external resources that include best practices, recommendations, and strategies or activities for promoting skills across three dimensions (learning and innovation skills; information, media, and technology skills; and 21st century interdisciplinary themes)
Measurement Tools
- Outlines key characteristics of effective 21st century assessment systems
- Includes example assessments and guidance on how to implement them
Key Publications
- Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2015). P21 Framework Definitions. Retrieved from: http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/docs/P21_Framework_Definitions_New_Logo_2015.pdf
- Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2016). Framework for 21st Century Living. Retrieved from: http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/docs/P21_framework_0816.pdf
- Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2017). 21st Century Skills Assessment. Retrieved from: http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/21st_Century_Skills_Assessment_e-paper.pdf
Partnership for 21st Century Learning, a network of Battelle for Kids
Developer Type
To prepare learners to acquire the skills needed in a world of constant change and innovation
Common Uses
Widespread adoption in schools; it is supported by many corporations in the US and abroad for its focus on business
Key Parameters
Level of detail, compare domains, compare frameworks, compare terms, explore other frameworks.
- Visual Tools
- Our Methods
Subscribe to Our Newsletter!
Search form
- Advanced Search
Critical Thinking Skills: Effective Analysis, Argument and Reflection (Paperback)
- Description
- About the Author
- Reviews & Media
The ability to demonstrate critical thinking is essential for students who seek to achieve good grades at university but it typically creates a lot of confusion and anxiety. Critical Thinking Skills provides an easy to follow, step by step guide to developing analytical reasoning skills and applying them to tasks such as reading, note-making and writing. A complex subject is broken down into easy to understand blocks, with clear explanations, good examples, and plenty of activities to develop understanding at each stage.
- Study & Test-Taking Skills
Leadership & Managing People
A Short Guide to Building Your Team's Critical Thinking Skills
A Short Guide to Building Your Team's Critical Thinking Skills ^ H0578M
Want to buy more than 1 copy? Contact: [email protected]
Product Description
Publication Date: October 11, 2019
Critical thinking isn't an innate skill. It can be learned.
This Product Also Appears In
Buy together, related products.
3 Ways to Make the Most of Your Alumni Network
HBR Guide to Critical Thinking
HBR Guide to Critical Thinking Toolkit
Copyright permissions.
If you'd like to share this PDF, you can purchase copyright permissions by increasing the quantity.
Order for your team and save!
- Shopping Cart
Advanced Search
- Browse Our Shelves
- Best Sellers
- Digital Audiobooks
- Featured Titles
- New This Week
- Staff Recommended
- Reading Lists
- Upcoming Events
- Ticketed Events
- Science Book Talks
- Past Events
- Video Archive
- Online Gift Codes
- University Clothing
- Goods & Gifts from Harvard Book Store
- Hours & Directions
- Newsletter Archive
- Frequent Buyer Program
- Signed First Edition Club
- Signed New Voices in Fiction Club
- Off-Site Book Sales
- Corporate & Special Sales
- Print on Demand
| Our Shelves |
- All Our Shelves
- Academic New Arrivals
- New Hardcover - Biography
- New Hardcover - Fiction
- New Hardcover - Nonfiction
- New Titles - Paperback
- African American Studies
- Anthologies
- Anthropology / Archaeology
- Architecture
- Asia & The Pacific
- Astronomy / Geology
- Boston / Cambridge / New England
- Business & Management
- Career Guides
- Child Care / Childbirth / Adoption
- Children's Board Books
- Children's Picture Books
- Children's Activity Books
- Children's Beginning Readers
- Children's Middle Grade
- Children's Gift Books
- Children's Nonfiction
- Children's/Teen Graphic Novels
- Teen Nonfiction
- Young Adult
- Classical Studies
- Cognitive Science / Linguistics
- College Guides
- Cultural & Critical Theory
- Education - Higher Ed
- Environment / Sustainablity
- European History
- Exam Preps / Outlines
- Games & Hobbies
- Gender Studies / Gay & Lesbian
- Gift / Seasonal Books
- Globalization
- Graphic Novels
- Hardcover Classics
- Health / Fitness / Med Ref
- Islamic Studies
- Large Print
- Latin America / Caribbean
- Law & Legal Issues
- Literary Crit & Biography
- Local Economy
- Mathematics
- Media Studies
- Middle East
- Myths / Tales / Legends
- Native American
- Paperback Favorites
- Performing Arts / Acting
- Personal Finance
- Personal Growth
- Photography
- Physics / Chemistry
- Poetry Criticism
- Ref / English Lang Dict & Thes
- Ref / Foreign Lang Dict / Phrase
- Reference - General
- Religion - Christianity
- Religion - Comparative
- Religion - Eastern
- Romance & Erotica
- Science Fiction
- Short Introductions
- Technology, Culture & Media
- Theology / Religious Studies
- Travel Atlases & Maps
- Travel Lit / Adventure
- Urban Studies
- Wines And Spirits
- Women's Studies
- World History
- Writing Style And Publishing
| Gift Cards |
The Critical Thinking ToolkitThe Critical Thinking Toolkit is a comprehensive compendium that equips readers with the essential knowledge and methods for clear, analytical, logical thinking and critique in a range of scholarly contexts and everyday situations. Takes an expansive approach to critical thinking by exploring concepts from other disciplines, including evidence and justification from philosophy, cognitive biases and errors from psychology, race and gender from sociology and political science, and tropes and symbols from rhetoric Follows the proven format of The Philosopher’s Toolkit and The Ethics Toolkit with concise, easily digestible entries, “see also” recommendations that connect topics, and recommended reading lists Allows readers to apply new critical thinking and reasoning skills with exercises and real life examples at the end of each chapter Written in an accessible way, it leads readers through terrain too often cluttered with jargon Ideal for beginning to advanced students, as well as general readers, looking for a sophisticated yet accessible introduction to critical thinking There are no customer reviews for this item yet. Classic Totes Tote bags and pouches in a variety of styles, sizes, and designs , plus mugs, bookmarks, and more! Shipping & Pickup We ship anywhere in the U.S. and orders of $75+ ship free via media mail! Noteworthy Signed Books: Join the Club! Join our Signed First Edition Club (or give a gift subscription) for a signed book of great literary merit, delivered to you monthly.  Harvard Square's Independent Bookstore © 2024 Harvard Book Store All rights reserved Contact Harvard Book Store 1256 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 Tel (617) 661-1515 Toll Free (800) 542-READ Email [email protected] View our current hours » Join our bookselling team » We plan to remain closed to the public for two weeks, through Saturday, March 28 While our doors are closed, we plan to staff our phones, email, and harvard.com web order services from 10am to 6pm daily. Store Hours Monday - Saturday: 9am - 11pm Sunday: 10am - 10pm Holiday Hours 12/24: 9am - 7pm 12/25: closed 12/31: 9am - 9pm 1/1: 12pm - 11pm All other hours as usual. Map Find Harvard Book Store » Online Customer Service Shipping » Online Returns » Privacy Policy » Harvard University harvard.edu » 
How critically can an AI think? A framework for evaluating the quality of thinking of generative artificial intelligence
Generative AI such as those with large language models have created opportunities for innovative assessment design practices. Due to recent technological developments, there is a need to know the limits and capabilities of generative AI in terms of simulating cognitive skills. Assessing student critical thinking skills has been a feature of assessment for time immemorial, but the demands of digital assessment create unique challenges for equity, academic integrity and assessment authorship. Educators need a framework for determining their assessments vulnerability to generative AI to inform assessment design practices. This paper presents a framework that explores the capabilities of the LLM ChatGPT4 application, which is the current industry benchmark. This paper presents the Mapping of questions, AI vulnerability testing, Grading, Evaluation (MAGE) framework to methodically critique their assessments within their own disciplinary contexts. This critique will provide specific and targeted indications of their questions vulnerabilities in terms of the critical thinking skills. This can go on to form the basis of assessment design for their tasks.
|
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
A Short Guide to Building Your Team's Critical Thinking Skills. by. Matt Plummer. October 11, 2019. twomeows/Getty Images. Summary. Most employers lack an effective way to objectively assess ...
The good news is that critical thinking is a learned behavior. ... Accelerate your career with Harvard ManageMentor®. HBR Learning's online leadership training helps you hone your skills with ...
Which is unfortunate, he says, since developing critical-thinking skills is vital not only to students' readiness for college and career, but to their civic readiness, as well. ... The Harvard EdCast is a weekly series of podcasts, available on the Harvard University iT unes U page, that features a 15-20 minute conversation with thought leaders ...
Bouygues outlines three key components of critical thinking: questioning your assumptions, reasoning through logic, and diversifying your thought process. Key episode topics include: strategy ...
The Urgency Trap. The urgency trap, which can be defined as the habitual, unbridled, and counterproductive tendencies to rush through decision making when under the pressure of too many demands, is a paradox because it limits the very thing that could help us be more innovative, efficient, and effective: Our critical thinking.
Really. Critical thinking isn't just about what happens in our own brains. When you're thinking critically in business, bring in other people! We don't consider the people impact in our decisions often enough. In fact, we pooh-pooh the "soft stuff." We feel safe with factors we can calculate on our HP-12B.
The answer is in how you think. The "HBR Guide to Critical Thinking" will help you navigate your most challenging issues, from difficult problems to tough decisions to complex scenarios. By carefully observing the situation, gathering information, inviting other perspectives, and analyzing what's in front of you, you can move forward with ...
www.communicate.gse.harvard.edu | 5 • A piece uses racial terminology that would be unacceptable for a modern author, but was standard at the time of writing. • An article about the role of standardized testing may rest on different assumptions depending on the author's home country. • A specialized journal of economics likely selects and publishes articles with a
Critical thinking isn't an innate skill. It can be learned. ... Most employers lack an effective way to objectively assess critical thinking skills and most managers don't know how to provide specific instruction to team members in need of becoming better thinkers. ... Harvard Business Publishing is an affiliate of Harvard Business School. We ...
This toolbox highlights thinking routines developed across a number of research projects at PZ. A thinking routine is a set of questions or a brief sequence of steps used to scaffold and support student thinking. PZ researchers designed thinking routines to deepen students' thinking and to help make that thinking "visible.".
Phi Delta Kappan, 71 (5), 366-371. Stimulating students to think can happen in one of two ways. On the first level, educators can take steps to help students 'pick up' the mindset of the course or discipline when they step into class. The second level involves prompting students to think beyond the surface and adopt a critical mindset.
Third, seek out fresh perspectives. It's tempting to rely on your inner circle to help you think through these questions, but that won't be productive if they all look and think like you. Get ...
It focuses on the skills and knowledge needed to succeed in work, life, and citizenship in today's world. View All Term Definitions. 21st Century Learning content knowledge and 21st… learning and innovation… information, media, and… life and career skills creativity and innovation critical thinking and ...
Visible Thinking is a flexible and systematic research-based conceptual framework, which aims to integrate the development of students' thinking with content learning across subject matters. Visible Thinking began as an initiative to develop a research-based approach to teaching thinking dispositions. The approach emphasized three core ...
When you employ critical thinking, you're putting your own experience, observation, analytical skills, and reasoning to work to examine the facts and to apply intellectual standards to those facts. Critical thinking involves asking questions, gathering information, removing preconceived notions, and communicating clearly about that which you're ...
Critical Thinking Skills provides an easy to follow, step by step guide to developing analytical reasoning skills and applying them to tasks such as reading, note-making and writing. A complex subject is broken down into easy to understand blocks, with clear explanations, good examples, and plenty of activities to develop understanding at each ...
Critical thinking is the ability to analyze and effectively break down an issue in order to make a decision or find a solution. ... Accelerate your career with Harvard ManageMentor®. HBR Learning ...
The oldest and still the most powerful tactic for fostering critical thinking is the Socratic method, developed over 2,400 years ago by Socrates, one of the founders of Western philosophy. The Socratic method uses thought-provoking question-and-answer probing to promote learning.
A Short Guide to Building Your Team's Critical Thinking Skills. ... Critical thinking isn't an innate skill. It can be learned. Product #: Related Topics: Strategy formulation, Developing employees, ... Harvard Business Publishing is an affiliate of Harvard Business School.
Format Paperback. ISBN 9780470658697. The Critical Thinking Toolkit is a comprehensive compendium that equips readers with the essential knowledge and methods for clear, analytical, logical thinking and critique in a range of scholarly contexts and everyday situations. Takes an expansive approach to critical thinking by exploring concepts from ...
Summary. Developing your strategic thinking skills isn't enough to get you promoted. In order to advance in your career, you need to demonstrate them. Leaders want to know what you think, and ...
Generative AI such as those with large language models have created opportunities for innovative assessment design practices. Due to recent technological developments, there is a need to know the limits and capabilities of generative AI in terms of simulating cognitive skills. Assessing student critical thinking skills has been a feature of assessment for time immemorial, but the demands of ...
How Leaders Should Think Critically. If you want to succeed in 21st Century business you need to become a critical thinker. Roger Martin of the Rotman School of Management figured this out a ...