M (SD)
Note. * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001. between younger and older children.
When looking at the connections between the SDQ dimensions and the parenting styles that were found (as shown in Table 2 ), there were low to moderate intercorrelations, which means there was no issue with multicollinearity.
Intercorrelations of the SDQ-Dimensions and Parenting Styles.
Correlations | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Internalizing Problems (SDQ) | Externalizing Problems (SDQ) | Prosocial Behavior (SDQ) | Authoritarian Parenting Style | Permissive Parenting Style | Authoritative Parenting Style | |
Internalizing problems (SDQ) | - | |||||
Externalizing problems (SDQ) | 0.41 *** | - | ||||
Prosocial behavior (SDQ) | −0.24 *** | −0.35 *** | - | |||
Authoritarian parenting style | 0.22 *** | 0.31 *** | −0.16 *** | - | ||
Permissive parenting style | 0.18 *** | 0.31 *** | −0.15 *** | 0.28 *** | - | |
Authoritative parenting style | −0.16 *** | −0.30 *** | 0.35 *** | −0.38 *** | −0.19 *** | - |
Note. *** = p < 0.001.
To test for construct validity and to verify the factor structure we performed a confirmatory factor analysis. CFA allows testing of the assumption that a hypothesized relationship between observed variables and their underlying latent constructs exists. The RMSEA, TLI, and CFI are deemed particularly important for accurately estimating CFAs [ 119 ]. Following Marsh et al. [ 120 ], we established the benchmark for a satisfactory model fit as RMSEA values below 0.08, coupled with CFI and TLI values above 0.90 and SRMR values below 0.08, indicating a strong fit for the model. The fit indices obtained from the confirmatory factor analysis applied were sufficient for the three parenting style scales, as evidenced by the following: (χ 2 (149) = 453.384, p < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.041 [90% CI = 0.037–0.046]; SRMR = 0.028 CFI = 0.923; TLI = 0.912), as for the five SDQ-parents sub-scales (χ 2 (231) = 587.411, p < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.036 [90% CI = 0.032–0.039]; SRMR = 0.042 CFI = 0.926; TLI = 0.903). This confirms the construct validity for each scale of the study.
We utilized three indicators, namely authoritarian, permissive, and authoritative parenting style, to group parents into distinct parenting style classes through the statistical application of Latent Profile Analysis (LPA). This allowed us to examine patterns of latent parenting styles, which encompassed multiple indicators and their interrelationships within the parenting style classes. By employing LPA as a comprehensive method, our objective was to assess the continuity of parenting style levels. The primary goal of this study was to use LPA to examine the proposed conceptualization of parenting styles, considering three aspects of parenting within an overarching latent structure, and to empirically classify latent variables into subgroups based on similar observations.
The models used in this study were non-nested. To determine the best model, different criteria were applied [ 121 ], including the entropy value, as well as information criteria such as the Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC), and Sample-Adjusted BIC (ABIC). The smaller values indicate a better fit [ 122 ]. Entropy was also considered, with values above 0.7 deemed sufficient to indicate certainty in the estimation, but with models of entropy of 1.0 being overidentified [ 123 , 124 ]. The final latent profile analysis (LPA) model was chosen based on various statistical indicators and theoretical considerations. Additionally, model fit criteria such as the Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin Likelihood Ration test (LMR-LRT), the Lo-Mendell-Rubin Adjusted Likelihood Ratio test (aLMR-LRT), and the Bootstrapped Likelihood Ratio test (BLRT) were used for the LPA. A significant p -value indicated an improvement to the previous model with k − 1 profiles. The ultimate model for an LPA, which determines the number of profiles, is selected based on a combination of statistical measures and pre-existing theoretical frameworks and the rule of the most parsimonious solution [ 125 ], which means that the interpretability and the additional information provided by a more complex solution has to be established. There are currently no established guidelines for determining the appropriate size of profiles [ 121 ]. Following Nylund [ 124 ], we are arguing against having profile sizes with less than 50 cases or these profiles being less than 5% of the total sample.
The analysis was conducted for a range of two to six latent patterns. Statistical tests of model fit can be found in Table 3 . A model consisting of four profiles was selected, as it had a lower aBIC score than a profile 3 solution, and the entropy was higher. For the comparison between the profile 3 the profile 4 solutions, we additionally applied model fit criteria with significant p -values for profile 3 over the profile two solutions, indicating an improvement to the previous model, but non-significant p -values on LMR-LRT and aLMR-LRT when comparing profile 3 and profile 4 but with still significant p -values on the BLRT, indicating an improvement for the profile 4 to the profile three models. When comparing the profile 4 to the 5 or 6 profile solution, we noticed several criteria decreasing. In comparison to the profile 4 solutions, we detected for profile 5 (aBIC Delta to profile 4 = 777) and 6 (aBIC Delta to profile 5 = 948) solutions a significant drop in aBIC differences, and for both solutions an Entropy of 1.0, which suggested weak evidence [ 126 ] and an overidentification of the model [ 127 ], leading us favoring the profile 4 solution.
Model Fit Indices for Latent Profile Analysis on Parenting Styles, N = 1203.
AIC | BIC | ABIC | Entropy | LMR LR Test -Values | ALMR LR Test -Value | Sample Proportion Per Profile ( ; %) | Classification Accuracy | Blt -Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2-Profiles | 3012 | 3063 | 3032 | 0.933 | >0.05 | >0.05 | (138; 11.4%) (1065; 88.5%) | >0.921 | <0.001 |
3-Profiles | 2494 | 2566 | 2521 | 0.979 | <0.001 | <0.001 | (949; 83.0) (151; 12.5) (53; 4.4) | >0.993 | <0.001 |
4-Profiles | 2174 | 2265 | 2208 | 0.995 | >0.05 | >0.05 | (803; 66.7) (197; 16.3) (53; 4.4) (150; 12.4) | >0.996 | <0.01 |
5-Profiles | 1397 | 1509 | 1439 | 1.00 | >0.05 | >0.05 | (197; 16.3) (103; 8.5) (71; 5.9) (803; 66.7) (18; 2.3) | 1.00 | <0.001 |
6-Profiles | 449 | 581 | 498 | 1.00 | >0.05 | >0.05 | (49; 3.9) (197; 16.3) (103; 8.5) (803; 66.7) (44; 3.6) (9; 0.7) | 1.00 | <0.001 |
Note. AIC = Akaike information criterion; BIC = Bayesian information criterion; ABIC = Sample-size adjusted BIC; LMR LR = Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin Likelihood Ratio Test; ALMR LR = Lo-Mendell-Rubin Adjusted LRT Test; BLRT = Bootstrap likelihood ratio test.
For the 5 (one profile with n = 18 participants, 2.3% of the sample) and 6 profile (one profile with n = 49, 3.9% of the sample; one profile with n = 44, 3.6% of the sample; one profile with n = 9, 0.7% of the sample), solutions had far too small sample sizes [ 124 , 128 ]. Additionally, for both the 5 and 6 profile solutions, the new profiles did not offer new theoretical insights. but merely split already existing small profiles. Based on the abovementioned criteria and the principle of favoring more restricted and simple models, the profile 4 solutions were ultimately chosen. Along with empirical measures, the selection of the profile 4 solutions was also influenced by its interpretability and alignment with existing theoretical frameworks.
By the three introduced parenting styles and the consecutive tests on a different number of profiles (two to six profiles), we identified the four-profile solution as the best fitting. Regarding the distribution of the four profiles (see Figure 1 ), we identified a profile (profile 1, 66.6% of the participants) called Highly Authoritative style (HA) with high levels of authoritative, the lowest levels of authoritarian and middle levels of permissive parenting styles. We additionally identified a profile called Relaxed Authoritative style (RA) (profile 2, 16.3% of the participants) with still high but lower levels of authoritative style than in profile 1, low but elevated levels of authoritarian style, and middle levels of permissive style. Profile 4 (12.4% of the participants), named Permissive Focused Authoritative style (PFA), had a mix of the second highest levels of authoritative and middle levels of permissive and slightly higher levels of authoritarian parenting styles. Finally, in profile 3 (4.4% of the participants), named Inconsistent Parenting style (IP), we identified parents with a blend of higher levels of authoritative and middle levels of permissive and authoritarian parenting levels. From the solution chosen, we could detect that parenting styles are a complex mix and multidimensional latent construct encompassing authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive styles, rather than a distinct single parenting style as commonly assumed.
Diagrammatic Representation of the four identified parenting style profiles by LPA.
We analyzed if there were differences in the patterns concerning parental education and parents’ age to control for any effects caused by these two covariates by using multinomial-regression analysis. Neither for education (Wald chi2(12) = 9.830, p = 0.631) nor for age (Wald chi2(6) = 6.091, p = 0.413) have significant effects been identified.
For the three SDQ dimensions (internalizing problems, externalizing problems, and prosocial behavior), we identified significantly lower levels of problems when comparing the “highly authoritative style” profile to the other three parenting profiles (see Table 4 ). This was especially the case when comparing the “highly authoritative style” profile to the “permissive focused authoritative style” or the “inconsistent parenting style” profile. No significant differences were identified (see Table 4 ) when comparing the levels of prosocial behavior of the four parenting profiles. In summary, we identified the “highly authoritative parenting style” profile to be the least connected to internalizing or externalizing problems of the respective children when studying the answers by their parents.
Multinomial logistic regression of SDQ-dimensions in the four LPA profiles.
LCA Wave 2 Profile | Predictor | B | SE | Wald Statistic | OR | Prediction in % Pseudo-R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cox & Snell | Nagelkerke | Mac-Fadden | |||||||
Permissive focused authoritative style | Intercept | −0.88 | 0.18 | 23.73 | <0.001 | 3.1 | 3.7 | 1.6 | |
SDQ-Internalizing | −0.99 | 0.21 | 22.62 | <0.001 | 0.37 | ||||
Inconsistent Parenting style | Intercept | −1.60 | 0.24 | 44.72 | <0.001 | ||||
SDQ-Internalizing | −1.48 | 0.30 | 24.49 | <0.001 | 0.23 | ||||
Relaxed Authoritative style | Intercept | −1.03 | 0.19 | 29.15 | <0.001 | ||||
SDQ-Internalizing | −0.44 | 0.21 | 4.39 | <0.01 | 0.64 | ||||
Permissive focused authoritative style | Intercept | −0.74 | 0.18 | 17.15 | <0.001 | 6.1 | 7.2 | 3.3 | |
SDQ-Externalizing | −1.19 | 0.21 | 33.16 | <0.001 | 0.31 | ||||
Inconsistent Parenting style | Intercept | −1.18 | 0.21 | 32.19 | <0.001 | ||||
SDQ-Externalizing | −2.24 | 0.30 | 56.68 | <0.001 | 0.11 | ||||
Relaxed Authoritative style | Intercept | −0.87 | 0.19 | 21.95 | <0.001 | ||||
SDQ-Externalizing | −0.64 | 0.21 | 9.56 | <0.01 | 0.53 | ||||
Permissive focused authoritative style | Intercept | −1.13 | 0.18 | 39.62 | <0.001 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 0.6 | |
SDQ-Prosocial behavior | −0.69 | 0.21 | 11.23 | <0.001 | 0.50 | ||||
Inconsistent Parenting style | Intercept | −2.28 | 0.29 | 61.26 | <0.001 | ||||
SDQ-Prosocial behavior | −0.55 | 0.33 | 2.70 | >0.05 | 0.58 | ||||
Relaxed Authoritative style | Intercept | −1.11 | 0.18 | 38.64 | <0.001 | ||||
SDQ-Prosocial behavior | −0.37 | 0.20 | 3.39 | >0.05 | 0.69 |
Note: S.E. = Standard Error; OR = Odds Ratio. Reference LPA profile is the profile we called “Highly Authoritative style”. For all three SDQ-dimensions: (0 normal; 1 at risk/clinical).
Given the lack of studies that capture parenting styles as a heterogeneous construct and therefore solely focus on the individual and the well-known parenting styles, i.e., authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive, we pursued the research question as to whether there are distinct parenting style profiles. We conceptualized parenting style as a multidimensional and latent construct encompassing diverse aspects of parenting rather than a single one. We, therefore, defined parenting style as a collection, a mix of parents’ attitudes, behaviors, and emotions [ 9 ].
By using latent profile analysis and examining the association between the identified profiles and adolescents’ externalizing and internalizing behavior problems and prosocial behavior, our study is able to confirm the relevance of presenting the different parenting dimensions in a more complex and appropriate picture of parenting profiles and their influence on adolescents’ socio-emotional skills. Person-centered approaches extend beyond commonly used methods for establishing these parenting styles or profiles, such as the scale-mean or median-split methods, which can be problematic when dealing with multiple dimensions [ 129 ].
The present study adopted a person-oriented method to overcome these limitations and address the complex interplay of multiple dimensions. This approach allowed, following Hypotheses 1, identification of distinct parental profiles using latent profile analysis, for an adequate representation of the combinations of parenting styles. Interestingly, previous studies using person-centered approaches have revealed different combinations of parenting styles but have not confirmed distinct forms of permissive parenting profiles [ 88 , 110 ] or authoritarian profiles [ 130 , 131 ]. Our results supported these findings by considering parenting styles as a multidimensional construct rather than mere forms of distinct parenting styles. These findings build on previous research and demonstrate how person-oriented methods can provide insights that are difficult to achieve with variable-oriented techniques. Detecting the latent profiles used in this study to identify parenting styles would be challenging, if not impossible, to confirm using traditional variable-oriented analyses.
Confirming Hypothesis 1, we found four distinct profiles regarding a mix of all three parenting styles. We could not identify a parenting style that was uniquely focused on authoritarian, authoritative, or permissive styles, demonstrating that parenting styles should be captured as a multidimensional, latent concept. Interestingly, all four patterns were very high in the authoritative style, suggesting that some form of responsiveness and control characterizes all profiles. This finding is in line with other studies [ 87 ], which also found several parenting profiles consisted of authoritative (i.e., adaptive) parenting practices. Additionally, in our research, most parents had middle levels of authoritarian style (i.e., negative features). Specifically, three out of four profiles showed some authoritarian parenting style combined with authoritative and permissive styles. This means that a third of the children and adolescents do experience intrusive, critical, scolding, and threatening behaviors common to authoritarian parents [ 17 , 22 , 23 ], in addition to some levels of warm, loving, and dialogical behaviors [ 17 , 21 ], as well as loose or contradictory discipline [ 18 ].
Notably, analyses of the latent profile frequencies indicated that most parents in our sample perceived their practices as exhibiting a relatively positive parenting style/profile. Given that the concept of equifinality (i.e., different early experiences in life) is helpful for interpreting how parenting styles are associated with adaptive or maladaptive behavioral outcomes over time [ 87 ], the results of the current study extend the research on multiple manifestations of adaptive parenting by Greek parents of children and adolescents. We found it surprising that the permissive style was present to a moderate degree in all four profiles. This means that, although permissiveness alone is negative for socio-emotional development in children and adolescents, our results demonstrate that it was not determinant for profile affiliation in combination with high authoritative and low authoritarian styles.
Confirming Hypothesis 2, the present study demonstrated that the socio-emotional development in childhood and adolescence is strongly linked to the parenting style experienced. Children and adolescents with parents with primarily authoritative parenting styles, characterized by high levels of behavioral control and support and lower levels of psychological control, show a positive developmental status. In contrast, adolescents with affective controlling parents manifest problems in externalizing and internalizing behavior. This aligns with the existing empirical evidence, which consistently shows that the authoritative parenting style is positive for adaptive socio-emotional development, while the others are not [ 132 , 133 , 134 ]. These findings propose that children and adolescents have fewer behavioral problems [ 36 ] and a reduced tendency to internalize problems and dangerous behaviors [ 80 , 81 ].
Although the majority of parenting programs aimed at parents have focused on improving communication with their children, there are limited studies addressing parenting strategies [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Thus, we assume that parents may need more support in coping with their children’s behavioral problems and improving their parenting abilities to decrease the problem behavior. By identifying different patterns of parenting styles, it becomes clear that not all parents have the same needs. Interventions can be tailored to parents’ individual needs and challenges based on their specific profile patterns. This is important because, if parents can learn to create a positive and supportive environment for their children, they can reduce the risk of externalizing and internalizing behavioral problems, especially as parent–child conflict starts early in a child’s life and is very stable over time [ 31 ]. Thus, we adopt Teuber’s et al. [ 8 ] suggestion that the person-oriented results pointed out that it is useful to reinforce parents with guidance on positive parenting skills through parenting programs that focus on adaptive parenting practices, and direct the several maladaptive effects of different forms of dysfunctional practices. Contrary to our expectations regarding prosocial behavior, no significant differences were identified when comparing the levels of prosocial behavior of the four parenting profiles, supposing that our findings are inconsistent with prior findings that indicated that parenting dimensions are related to adolescents’ prosocial behavior [ 70 , 71 ]. Considering that we used SDQ parent reports regarding their children’s prosocial behavior, our study examined prosocial behavior as a global construct, ignoring differentiation between the subtypes of this behavior (e.g., altruistic, compliant, emotional, and public) [ 57 ], as well as between the motivations underlying it.
While our research on Hypotheses 3 challenges the assumption that parents’ age and education are strong determinants of parenting patterns [ 108 , 109 , 110 ], it is essential to note that the existing literature suggests some weak associations. Therefore, it is crucial to interpret our findings with caution. Nonetheless, our study underscores the need for further investigation into the multifaceted factors that influence parenting behaviors and the potential role of intervention programs, such as the newly developed profiles, in shaping these behaviors.
The implications of our findings on Hypothesis 3 are twofold. Firstly, it is suggested that other factors not considered in our research may have a more substantial impact on parenting patterns. It is possible that aspects such as cultural influences, personal values, or individual experiences may play a more significant role in shaping how parents interact with their children. Secondly, the reduced effects of parents’ age and education observed in our study could be attributed to the effectiveness of the newly developed profiles. These profiles might have facilitated a greater homogenization of parenting practices, potentially minimizing the impact of individual characteristics, such as age and education.
Even if the insights gained by the chosen analytic design clearly expand the previous knowledge on parenting styles, there are a few limitations. As patterns of parental styles are not traits but states, we needed, instead of the chosen cross-sectional approach, a full longitudinal design. In future research, a latent transition analysis (LTA) should be applied to indicate significant differences in the longitudinal classification of the identified parenting patterns. LTA, the longitudinal extension of LCA, is a statistical tool that models possible parenting style pattern transitions over time. Especially. the findings regarding the “highly authoritative parenting style” as the least connected to children’s internalizing or externalizing problems should be approached with caution. There may be other confounding factors not considered in the analysis that could influence these associations, such as autonomy support and controlling parenting [ 135 , 136 ] or child–parent communication [ 137 ]. We also used parents’ self-perceptions of their parenting styles. Including the children’s perceptions of the respective parenting styles would have been interesting. Given that relations with parents play a distinct role in children’s development, the respective qualities of the relationship between parents and children are significant predictors of children’s academic, personal, and social development [ 138 ].
In addition, as our sample only included participants from a specific cultural context (Greek parents), the generalization of the findings to other countries and cultural contexts is rather limited. Furthermore, the sample restrictions and our specific sampling approach via the Internet can be considered another study limitation, even if our sample was large enough to be considered stable against minor deviations. Nevertheless, Mann and Stewart [ 139 ] noticed the risk of losing sight of who responds to online questionnaires. For example, about 90% of mothers answered our questionnaire. Although these surveys do not represent the total population of internet users, non-probability samples can be valuable, as they may be representative of a subgroup of the total population [ 113 ]. Another limitation is that marital status did not indicate if the parents were single mothers or fathers. In a future study, we could ask for this additional information, because it may matter to the chosen parenting styles [ 5 ]. We also did not ask for family income or migration status, both conditions that can also affect parenting styles [ 91 , 140 ].
To sum up, our results succeeded in extending parental types beyond the traditional authoritarian, permissive, and authoritative styles. The current study brings to light the person-centered approach in which parenting styles are better expanded into four parenting profiles, with the authoritative style predominating. Given the importance of the finding that one-third of children and adolescents exhibit behavior problems, the socio-emotional development in childhood and adolescence reaffirms the necessity of parenting programs to guide parenting practices.
This research was supported by The Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) through the SNF-Project 100019_185481 “Understanding the resilience pathways of adolescent students with experience of physical family violence: The interplay of individual, family and school class risk and protective factors”, awarded to WK (University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland).
Conceptualization, A.V. and W.K.; methodology, A.V., W.K. and A.K.; formal analysis, W.K.; data collection, A.K.; original draft preparation, A.V. and W.K.; writing—review and editing, A.V., W.K., A.K., D.A., C.A.F. and S.T.; funding acquisition, W.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and did not have to be approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hellenic Open University because of the sample (participants’ age) and the topic.
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Conflicts of interest.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
|
Parenting is a challenging yet rewarding endeavor. But how do we decide how to raise our children? Many people who have kids, whether they parent alone or with a partner, have asked this question. It can be overwhelming when choosing types of parenting styles to follow, especially since these styles can vary from person to person. Here, we’ll walk you through the different parenting styles identified by researchers over the years and their impact on children.
This parenting style is all about being responsive, nurturing, and supportive while setting firm limits for children [ * ]. Let’s look at the details of this parenting style.
The authoritative parenting style is characterized by a balance between independence and structure. It allows children to grow within reasonable boundaries while still exploring their abilities and desires. While parents who use this style implement strict standards that they expect their children to abide by, they also provide support by fostering an emotionally caring environment that builds trust.
This style of parenting is sometimes called “tough but fair.” Children have the space to make mistakes without fear of judgment while still having a structure that provides guidance. Other characteristics of authoritative parenting include supportive rather than punitive disciplinary measures and being assertive but not intrusive and restrictive.
Children raised using an authoritative parenting style are usually confident, happy, and successful. They are more likely to make good decisions and evaluate risks better on their own. Authoritative parenting is connected to academic achievement, heightened self-esteem, and resilience [ * ].
Children with authoritative parents tend to have the following:
Children who are raised with this style of parenting can be trusted to make the right decisions on their own. These kids also tend to set high expectations for themselves. They tend to perform well academically and socially, and they are less likely to abuse drugs or alcohol. This may be helpful for parenting children with different needs, such as the highly sensitive child .
There are many examples where authoritative parenting styles can be seen. One situation where it clearly shows is during mealtimes.
Rather than imposing strict restrictions and rules, authoritative parents model eating behaviors. They will typically include kids during meal preparation and involve them in the decision-making, such as choosing what to have for dinner one night a week. Research shows that authoritative parenting leads to better outcomes in weight management and eating habits in children [ * ].
Related Article: Mindful Parenting: Benefits, Tips, and Examples
Authoritarian parents are much more rigid than authoritative parents and implement tough rules for their children to follow. Learn more about this type of parenting below.
Authoritarian parenting styles are characterized by the strict enforcement of rules that children are expected to follow without question. These rules are not open for interpretation, compromise, or further discussion. This parenting style is also known for using punishments when rules are violated to ensure obedience from children. Affection is not usually expressed, if at all.
This approach to parenting can have negative consequences on children that can follow them into adulthood. Children who were raised by authoritarian parents often have trouble with the following:
Authoritarian parenting does not seem to instill lasting lessons. Children will often act out in their parents' absence and seek guidance from someone else, both of which are signs that your child does not respect you .
Let us use the same example of mealtimes to illustrate the authoritarian parenting style.
Unlike authoritative parents who involve their children in the decision-making and preparation of meals for the family, authoritarian parents are more likely to enforce strict rules. They may require everyone to eat simultaneously and enforce punishments for not finishing on their plate. The family is less likely to discuss why they eat certain foods and how they contribute to culture, health, and well-being.
Permissive parenting styles don’t implement rules or structures that may upset their children. Here are the characteristics of this type of parenting.
The permissive parenting style is considered the opposite of the authoritarian parenting style. It is characterized by the non-implementation of rules or structures that may go against what the child wants. Parents who use this style usually give their children what they want. They also often act as peers or friends to their kids.
While being extra responsive to your child’s needs can be beneficial, the lack of structure can have negative consequences. Parents who practice a permissive parenting style may end up with entitled or anxious children who develop those traits because no one is taking charge.
Since children have high authority and standing in the household, children of permissive parents are used to getting what they want. This can lead to behavioral problems as they are not used to authority and rules.
Some downsides of permissive parenting include the following:
Children who undergo this style of parenting may become egotistical, selfish, and entitled. They may also refuse or fail to put any effort into school, work, and social endeavors since they are not expected to do so at home. If your child is constantly angry as a result of this type of parenting, you may need to use certain rules to parent an angry child .
Permissive parents may also raise children with a greater risk of developing health problems, such as a high BMI and obesity, as they struggle to limit unhealthy food intake or promote regular exercise [ * ]. Children are also more likely to develop cavities since permissive parents do not enforce good habits such as tooth brushing.
Let us use the same example of mealtimes mentioned above to illustrate permissive parenting. In this parenting style, parents are lax about the foods their children have, allowing them to choose whatever they want. Parents will even go out of their way to provide what their children desire.
This may lead to picky eating and unhealthy dietary choices. Not only is permissive parenting associated with a lower intake of fruits and vegetables, but it may also result in children experiencing difficulty being flexible with food options in social settings.
Also known as the neglectful parenting style, uninvolved parents often ignore their children and offer little guidance, nurturing, and attention. Read on to learn more about this parenting style.
Parents who practice the uninvolved or neglectful parenting style do not interact much with their children. This parenting style is characterized by the non-implementation of any structure or rules. These parents also do not show much affection to their children or get involved with their kids’ lives. Children are mostly left to fend for themselves.
This parenting style can negatively impact children, especially when taken to the extreme. Even if it is not physically damaging, the emotional and psychological consequences of this parenting style can be severe. It can lead to children:
Neglectful parents may also raise children who develop attachment issues. This is a result of a fleeting or absent parent-child bond or relationship.
Uninvolved parents are very inconsistent when it comes to mealtimes at home. They might not plan meals or even buy groceries at all, leaving children to fend for themselves. As a result, children may become preoccupied with food and often eat too much when food does become available, leading to obesity.
Here are some commonly asked questions regarding styles of parenting.
While most parents adopt mixed parenting styles, the authoritative parenting style is most common [ * ].
The most recommended parenting style is the authoritative parenting style. Clear communication, structure and support, and age-appropriate standards allow for the development of emotionally stable adults who can navigate life more successfully.
Culture plays a significant role in shaping parenting styles by influencing parents' values, beliefs, and goals for their children.
Individualistic cultures may favor authoritative or permissive styles, while collectivistic cultures may emphasize authoritarian approaches. Values like respect for elders, gender roles, and academic achievement can shape discipline, expectations, and child-rearing practices [ * ].
There are many other parenting style subtypes, including helicopter parenting, free-range parenting, snowplow parenting, lighthouse parenting, attachment parenting, parallel parenting, and tiger parenting.
There's no perfect parenting style, but by understanding the different approaches and their potential effects, you can find a balance that works for your family. Your child's needs will change over time, so be flexible and adjust your approach as they grow. The most important thing is to create a loving and supportive environment that fosters your child's unique potential.
If you need tips on parenting an anxious child or want to learn how to support children with specific needs, then do not hesitate to contact a qualified professional.
References:
No articles found...
Please note: comments must be approved before they are published.
In court documents, Halle claimed that her ex-husband’s history of “prioritizing soccer activities” over their 10-year-old son’s educational and psychological well-being has “worsened” his “educational and behavioral challenges.”
BuzzFeed Staff
Halle and Olivier’s divorce was finalized last August, almost eight years after they parted ways in 2015. They welcomed Maceo in 2013 — the same year they got married — and when they split, they agreed to share joint legal custody of their son.
According to People , Halle was required to pay Olivier $8,000 a month in child support and an additional “4.3% of any income she receives above $2,000,000.”
“They have very different parenting styles,” the source said . “Coparenting hasn't been easy. Still, they both love Maceo, and he's amazing...[he's a] very focused student. Halle very much tries to keep his life private.”
View this photo on Instagram
Halle purportedly claimed that she’s fought for “tutoring, an educational assessment,” and finding a suitable environment to aid Maceo’s “educational challenges.”
However, she alleged that Olivier has been “oppositional” and “unmoving,” alleging that Olivier’s history of “prioritizing soccer activities over Maceo’s educational and psychological wellbeing” has “worsened” the 10-year-old’s “educational and behavioral challenges.”
BuzzFeed has reached out to Olivier’s representatives for comment.
Parental values and attitudes, methods of effective guidance, the role of discipline with punishment, constructive and destructive elements in parenting styles, parenting and influence of the society.
Description of Concrete Experience : I have found parenting to be a very tasking job yet important responsibility that one has in a lifetime. Unfortunately, there is no formal education to guide me in parenting; all I have is a handful of literature materials on the subject. I mostly rely on the experience I received from my parents. I usually do either what they did to me or do what I felt was supposed to be done based on my personal opinion
Reflection: As a parent, rather a mother of two children it has not been an easy task trying to bring them up in the most appropriate way. There is no parenting class offered in school and the guidance given in the hospital before birth mainly focuses on the birth process. No one gives a very comprehensive guideline on how to bring up children until they become responsible adults. Most people muddle along until they make it.
As a single parent, my main concern has been to try the much I can to understand my children’s behavior and give them the most appropriate guidance. Knowing that they will at one point become adolescents, I have made efforts to try and get any relevant form of training that will assist me in guiding them when the right time comes. Under the training, I learned the different reactions of my children to people as well as different events.
Generalization/Principles/Theories : Psychologists have made efforts to research and come up with recommendations on the best parenting tactics. Parents might therefore acquire the parenting skills by going for the appropriate training.
Since the death for my husband on April 2003, it has been very challenging to parent my children singlehandedly. My children lack a father figure and this has affected them in a way.
Psychologists have recommended the best way to ensure that your children are brought up to become responsible adults. It is quite common for children raised by single parents to be seriously affected and if not well-guided they might start indulging in unacceptable acts like substance abuse.
Testing and Application : I have sought help from psychologists under the family therapy program as well as the psychotherapy and this has had a great impact in helping me develop better parenting skills.
I can now understand my two children and avoid practices that are unhealthy. I have been able to adapt the best practices when it comes to matters like administering disciplinary measures to them as well as helping them avoid bad habits.
Some of the tactics I use include taking some of their privileges away, for instance, I do this through denying my son the chance to watch television, having fun at the play station, hanging out with his friends, going for skating as well as doing some spanking among other forms of instilling discipline.
For my daughter on the other hand, I do it by basically making sure that she does not get her privileges for instance, by taking away her cell phone as well as denying her the chance to watch television.
Description of Concrete Experience : I learnt that in the early stages of development, the child is in most cases preoccupied with acquisition of knowledge and values and this mainly comes from the environment from which the child brought up. This means my children behave according to the attitude that I as the parent portray towards them.
If I have a negative attitude towards my children, they tend to behave badly because of the notion that I do not show love to them. Name-calling is also a problem. When a parent constantly refers to a disobedient child as naughty, there are high chance that the children will grow perceiving themselves as naughty.
This is widely known as the self-fulfilling prophesies. In the same way, I have learnt to always have a positive perception toward my children. I believe that they are growing up with a better perception of themselves which is that they are good people expected to behave well.
Reflection : This tactic has worked for me. I always want my children to have a positive outlook toward life and have a high self-esteem.
I therefore for focus on their positive aspects and encourage them to develop positive traits instead of focusing on their shortfalls or how bad they are. I correct them by showing them the right values that I want them to acquire. I do my best to act as a role model to them hence showing them the right path to follow.
One cannot for instance expect the child to be hard working if he/she is not providing the best example for being hard working. Children basically acquire their values from the parents whether consciously or unconsciously. If the parent is a drunkard, the child is most likely to become one as that is the value that the child will have acquired.
Generalization/Principles/Theories : the Information Processing Theory of Cognitive Development explains that a child’s brain can be compared to the computer. This translates to mean that the brain accepts input and uses the same information to process the output.
The child will therefore perceive and understand issues according to the input acquired particularly from those parenting them. Whatever occurs in the physical or the social environment of the child greatly influences their expectations or understanding about life issues.
Their social, cultural, or even cultural environment greatly influences their development and this is basically acquired from the adults around them. As a mother, I have a very significant role in my children’s cognitive development because they depend on what I teach them or what they learn from my conduct to develop they behavior.
Testing and Application : my children usually prefer to emulate me and other adults as they develop their own personality. In some cases, my children may play the roles of parents in their games and this allows them take responsibility in a simulated setting making decisions and acting like responsible grown-ups.
This just shows the role that parenting plays in the cognitive development of a child. Children may for instance play games that mimic proper behavioral conduct or routine activities of those values instilled in them in the earlier years.
Children acquire logical reasoning at an early age; they are able to use deductive methods of reasoning to come up with conclusions. Such deductions are in most cases acquired from their environments. Children born in conservative families, cultures, or belief systems tend to be conservative. In most cases, they stick to the principles and beliefs installed in them and they are very reluctant to act or go against those beliefs.
Description of Concrete Experience: as a parent, I strive to give effective guidance to my children. I feel that am obliged to use techniques that will minimize conflict between me and them children. In this endeavor punishment and discipline are two different things.
My method of guidance is developmentally appropriate because I now understand what my children want and what I expect from them. I consider my children as very important members of my family. As such they need to be loved and I take up this duty to ensure better development. Just like any other child, I understand that children need my love and need to know they are loved. I give them unconditional love.
As a single parent, I try to see to it that the children feel my love as they have no one else to look to when it comes to parental love. Even while implementing the disciplinary measures, I make them understand that it is for their own good as I want them to become responsible people.
Reflection : As a parent of a teenage son, it is never easy to give the appropriate guidance whenever the child has made a mistake. Most adolescents become rowdy and they may be unwilling to cooperate in different ways.
Punishing my son sometimes draws him away and he distances himself and hence making it even more difficult for me to give the needed guidance. In such cases, disciplining the child might be of greater significance than administering punishment.
The best way of fostering discipline for me has been to ensure effective communication and openness with the child and talking to him/her about the issue at hand. The method is effective and it can work for children of different ages. In most cases, the results are usually positive. In fact, the child is able to contribute to the solution to his/her own problem.
Generalization/Principles/Theories: It is always good to understand the development stage a child is going through. It could be more harmful when I view my child as a failure or a letdown when it comes to the behavior. I understand that my children are still in the age bracket of learning behavior that can be termed as acceptable. As far as I see, the best guidance approach is preventive rather than curative.
This makes me to be sensitive about the feelings of my children and I respect their feelings and address bad behavioral aspects. I always seek establish the reason behind certain behaviors of my children must be established. As a parent, I have developed a relationship that is supportive with my children so as to foster the guidance.
Testing and Application: there are some standard guidance approaches that are very beneficial in ensuring that children attain better self control and respect for other people.
As a parent, I have acted as a role model to my children and my zeal to learn better parenting skills has also paid off well as I have managed to keep my children obedient. They always feel loved and accepted as they are and this has helped be foster their self-concept.
I have always given them options that I know I can be able to abide by myself. I also give realistic options and sensible repercussions for defiance. Considering that some behaviors come because of the environment in which people grow, I have adopted an approach that constantly changes the environment to avoid certain bad behaviors that may develop.
Description of Concrete Experience: Discipline helps children to adopt acceptable ways or habits and it entails teaching good behavior and rebuking bad behavior. Punishment on the other hand is reprimanding bad behavior with aim of preventing such behavior in future or deterrence of unacceptable conduct.
It’s often a parent’s way of reacting to anger. It is a hurtful act that helps to prevent the child from committing the mistake although this is short-lived. I know that punishment does not give any guidance to the children but could precipitate into unhealthy relationship between the parent and the child. Punishment is not the best option for in trying to correct my children.
My children need to learn appropriate behavior in a positive way and punishment is just a short-lived remedy to the problem of wrongdoing. Children who are punished may in the long run become very different people as compared to those disciplined.
Reflection : Discipline plays a very significant role in a child’s development. It is meaningful to a child as it enables him/her to rectify the mistake and points to the right thing to do. The child feels appreciated and he/she becomes part of the solution to the problem at hand.
Punishment on the other hand does not show the child what to do. The child is left to feel that he/she is bad. It might in fact have nothing to do with the mistake. It does not make sense to the child.
Generalization/Principles/Theories: In disciplining, I take the position of a role model hence a guide to my children by being a good example to them. In punishment, however, I am the judge over the misconduct and I pass the judgment to them by inflicting pain like grounding them, denying them television, taking away their computer games, telephone, and for my son sometimes spanking. After one is disciplined, the person feels motivated while punishment results in the demoralization of the subject.
Testing and Application : Punishment might be administered by inflicting pain to the offender or denying them something and this is usually effective because children attach so much value to things like TV and computer games.
However, the only problem is that it may leave a negative feeling that as a parent I do not love them 100%, it’s therefore a great challenge trying to let them know that I punish them because I love them.
In my case, for instance, I use both denying of privileges as well as spanking while trying to correct my children’s behavior and they change their behavior and even ask for forgiveness. Whenever the children fail to comply by the discipline I offer, then they become liable for some punishment.
I use both discipline and punishment to ensure that my children will grow to become responsible members of the society. My discipline approach encompasses training and imparting proper knowledge while punishment is mainly inflicting pain, emotional and physical.
Description of Concrete Experience: Parenting can be both constructive as well as destructive. Those elements of parenting that are constructive should be encouraged while the destructive ones should be discouraged.
Some of the constructive ones might include; building a good rapport between the children and the parent, reinforcing the desired behavior, and letting the children understand the consequences of bad behavior. Punishment is just one of the destructive parenting elements. Here pain or agony is inflicted to the child so as to force them to stop a negative behavior. It might be in form of corporal punishment or verbal reprimand.
Reflection: Discipline coupled with guidance tends to be very beneficial when reinforcing good behavior and this is precisely much of what I use.
Many people know that parents must act as role models so as to instill the desired values into their children. Reprimands if not well used or targeted at a given character might just result in reinforcing the negative character as it gives the child the attention.
In some cases, the child might feel slandered and develop a negative attitude. This is the reason why I show a lot of affection to KA and ZA and make use positive reinforcements so as to encourage positive behavior rather than punitive measures. A good relationship makes my children feel more secure and therefore are always willing to comply with my parenting manipulation of their behavior.
Generalization/Principles/Theories: The Authoritarian Parenting style is based strict rules and being in charge. The parents using this strategy seek to take total control of all the aspects of their children’s lives. Parents hence institute stringent rules, they are inflexible, unbending, and strict. Such parent can be said to use ‘iron rod’ in ruling their children.
Defiance of the rules leads to punishment and the relationship between the parents and the children lacks warmth and affection. Children cannot develop ability to think well as parents do not explain reason behind the rules and they have problems of expressing themselves.
The permissive parenting style is the approach where parents are more loving and the parents do not strive to take control but allow their children to be in charge of their behavior. Parents do not usually institute a lot of rules and even the few that ate set are often lenient.
Parents require their children to develop critical thinking skills to know that bad behavior is harmful to self and others. Children are not often punished because parents fear that they may cause harm or the children would be offended and develop negative attitudes towards them. These parents are kind and loving but problem could escalate when children’s behavior becomes more rebellious requiring strong reprimand.
The democratic parenting styles employ a model that seems to be having permissive and authoritarian attributes. Democratic parents only enforce rules they deem very necessary and are also liberal in dealing with situations. These parents are loving and firm in their stance and are able to strike a good balance between high and low expectations.
This style allows parents and children to work together towards common goals and consequently, the children will grow to love their parents and revere their guidance. Children will grow to become more responsible and this is why I have adopted this parenting style.
Testing and Application : as a parent, I have been more consistent as this reduces resistance on the side of my children. My parenting style has developed a harmonious relationship between me as a parent and my two children.
Consequently, I often get positive results at the end. The parent needs to be flexible and be willing to listen and negotiate with the child especially if he/she is an adolescent. This reduces resistance and the child feels appreciated hence developing positive judgment. The parent needs to set behavior limits.
The parent must be ready to reward positive or desirable behavior and help the child in developing self-discipline. Eliminating negative behavior without reinforcing positive ones might not be that effective. The parent might also deny the child some privileges like taking the phone from the child, denying the child driving privileges, not allowing them to go out with their friends among other strategies.
Description of Concrete Experience: The situation in which the society is in today has brought a lot of challenges to parenting. These challenges are increasingly becoming more prevalent because of the characteristics of the society as being sophistication. As long as parenting is in the realm of the society, its implications can hence be overlooked. Accordingly, the societal challenges of parenting greatly vary based on individual. Having the knowledge of these challenges have made me better prepared to seek for means or reacting adequately as to be a good parent.
Parenting effectively in the contemporary society is a very challenging task. Most people have drifted away from the ancient ways of parenting. Today’s children are exposed to all forms of media which tends to influence their moral perceptions. They are also prone to the peer pressure and drug abuse. It is therefore not an easy task to instill discipline or good morals to these children.
Reflection : Today’s parents are expected to work so as to care for their families. They therefore spend most of their time at the workplace and have very little time with the children. It seems as though most of the children today interact more with technology than with their parents.
Children therefore lack role models and they tend to emulate the celebrities. The children today mature faster and become sexually active at a very early age and they are likely to indulge in sexual activities even before their right time comes.
The influence of the society is the main challenge in that as a parent I have been forced to put into consideration the developing norms of the society like allowing my children access to internet and their privacy. Basically, I seek to ensure that as much as I try to uphold social and moral rules, I do not end up exposing my children to negative social influence. As such I encourage religious and moral uprightness.
Generalization/Principles/Theories : a major challenge that parents face is having difficult children. These are the type of children who seem to be very hard to control or offer guidance to. This can spark violence as parents seek to take drastic actions to correct their children. As a parent, I seek to do this job with love and temperament, and natural understanding.
In the contemporary world, teenage parenting is very taxing because the teenagers are ambitious and exposed to too much information because of the societal sophistication in information technology.
This involves a lot of maturity and I strive to warn my teenage son to be careful on what he watches, reads, and the friends he keep. I have made my children know that my role is to shape their future and not jeopardize their well-being.
Because of job demands, I have sometimes failed to attend to what my children do during the day when am not around but I am confident that they would not misbehave on such grounds. I work hard do all the things I deem necessary for my children and I strive to spend much time with them as possible.
Testing and Application : as a single parent, the contemporary society puts much pressure on an individual because naturally, a child needs to have a mother and a father. This is the most prevalent challenge in parenting today because the number of signal parents is increasing and is caused by various reasons.
Children brought up by signal parents are thought to be spoilt and irresponsible because of the imbalance of parenting during their upbringing. I understand the impact of teenage behaviors including peer influence, risk of early sexual behavior, and risk of drug abuse.
As a parent, I learn to stay with my children to help unlearn whatever bad habits they picked from friends or other bad influencers. I use the knowledge of the contemporary challenges to help me find the best ways of responding properly to these challenges.
IvyPanda. (2018, May 28). Parenting's Skills, Values and Styles. https://ivypanda.com/essays/parenting/
"Parenting's Skills, Values and Styles." IvyPanda , 28 May 2018, ivypanda.com/essays/parenting/.
IvyPanda . (2018) 'Parenting's Skills, Values and Styles'. 28 May.
IvyPanda . 2018. "Parenting's Skills, Values and Styles." May 28, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/parenting/.
1. IvyPanda . "Parenting's Skills, Values and Styles." May 28, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/parenting/.
Bibliography
IvyPanda . "Parenting's Skills, Values and Styles." May 28, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/parenting/.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Psychologists have therefore established three different parenting styles that are used by parents either with or without their consent. The parenting styles, permissive, authoritative and authoritarian are usually based on the communication styles, disciplinary strategies as well as warmth and nurture. This paper is therefore an in-depth ...
Parenting styles are associated with different child outcomes, and the authoritative style is generally linked to positive behaviors such as strong self-esteem and self-competence. However, other important factors—including culture, children's temperament , children's perceptions of parental treatment, and social influences—also play an ...
Although parenting styles constitute a well-known concept in parenting research, two issues have largely been overlooked in existing studies. In particular, the psychological control dimension has rarely been explicitly modelled and there is limited insight into joint parenting styles that simultaneously characterize maternal and paternal practices and their impact on child development.
parenting styles and promoting guiding parenting is warranted. Parenting styles affect children in the areas of behavior, risk-taking, mental health, and. How Parenting Style Influences Children: A Review of Controlling, Guiding, and Permitting Parenting Styles on Children's Behavior, Risk-Taking, Mental Health, and Academic Achievement ...
At a glance, the 2×2 matrix reveals why so many people regard authoritative parenting as optimal. Being responsive and sensitive is a good thing, and two styles - authoritative and permissive - meet this criterion.. Being demanding is also helpful for aspects of child development, and two styles - authoritative and authoritarian - display this feature.
4 parenting styles. There are four main parenting styles: authoritarian, authoritative, permissive and neglectful. You don't have to commit to one style. It's natural to use different styles in different situations. When safety is at stake, a parent might use a firm authoritarian style that leaves no room for negotiation.
Parenting styles are typically characterized by two dimensions: demandingness and responsiveness. Demandingness refers to "the extend parents control their children's behavior or demand their maturity" ("4 Types of parenting styles and their effects," 2021, para. 11). Responsiveness signifies "the degree parents are accepting and ...
Parenting styles are a crucial factor in shaping a child's personality, behavior, and overall development. Depending on the approach, parents can have positive or negative effects on their children. In this essay, we will discuss the three main parenting styles - authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive - and their impact on children.
Abstract. This research explores the relationship between parenting styles and child development in the community context. It delves into the various parenting styles, including authoritarian ...
Dimensional approaches. In response to the cultural critiques of parenting styles, current research focuses on discrete dimensions of par-enting, providing greater specificity in understanding parenting effects. For instance, behavioral control has been distinguished from psychological control and paren-tal knowledge.
Delinquency (vandalism, assault, rape, petty theft) Lower cognitive and emotional empathy. Diminished self-esteem. Children of uninvolved parents might, for example, get in trouble at school or ...
Parenting Styles: Advantages and Disadvantages. Kids do what they are made to do because they want to escape the punishment. As parents support children, they become independent and strong-willed. The Three Parenting Styles. This style of parenting is where the parents let their children to make decisions on their own.
Parenting styles are collections of parental attitudes, practices, and non-verbal expressions that characterize the nature of parent- child relationships. Because individuals learn how to parent from many different examples including their own parents, role models, society and life experiences. Parenting techniques can vary greatly from ...
This parenting style was related to less optimal child outcomes, including lower self-efficacy (Baumrind et al., 2010), ... Finally, although many papers were focused on children of different ages, few studies compared possible variation of parental styles with the child's developmental changes with regard to age. Bornstein and Lamb ...
Research begun by developmental psychologist Diana Baumrind in the 1960s identified three main parenting styles —authoritarian, indulgent, and authoritative. Later studies added a fourth ...
A child's morals, principles, and conduct are generally established through this bond. Researchers have grouped parenting styles into 3, 4, 5, or more psychological constructs. This topic's content will only focus on 4 parenting categories: authoritarian, authoritative, permissive, and uninvolved. Every category employs a unique approach to how ...
Choosing what parenting style, that you will practice to raise your children is one of the most important decision a parent can make. Knowing which would be the best form of style for you and your child growth and development.
There are three parenting styles according to a classical classification: authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive (Hamon and Schrodt 151). To compare them, it is necessary to review the effective and ineffective techniques in each style. Get a custom essay on Parenting Style and the Development. 183 writers online.
Parenting Styles Essay. The effects of parenting styles on children's well-being. Parenting styles are the strategies that parents use to raise their children. Moreover, these styles are strictly correlated with a child's mental, physical, social and emotional development. Again, "the parenting styles refer to the manner in which parents ...
The importance of having both parents present in a child's life and whether two-parent households are necessary for a child's well-being. 6. The cultural and societal norms surrounding two-parent households and.... View our collection of parenting style essays. Find inspiration for topics, titles, outlines, & craft impactful parenting style papers.
In this parenting style, the parents are nurturing, responsive, and supportive, yet set firm limits for their children. They attempt to control children's behavior by explaining rules, discussing, and reasoning. They listen to a child's viewpoint but don't always accept it. Children raised with this style tend to be friendly, energetic ...
1.1. Parenting Styles. Parenting style is a collection of parents' attitudes, behaviors, and emotions [].Therefore, we can conceptualize parenting styles as representing general types of child-rearing that characterize parents' typical strategies and responses [].In particular, parental behavior is established in four specific behavioral dimensions: control, maturity demands, clarity of ...
This parenting style is all about being responsive, nurturing, and supportive while setting firm limits for children . Let's look at the details of this parenting style. Characteristics. The authoritative parenting style is characterized by a balance between independence and structure. It allows children to grow within reasonable boundaries ...
Halle Berry Has Requested Sole Legal Custody Of Her And Olivier Martinez's 10-Year-Old Son. In court documents, Halle claimed that her ex-husband's history of "prioritizing soccer activities" over their 10-year-old son's educational and psychological well-being has "worsened" his "educational and behavioral challenges."
Parenting Skills and Their Development. Description of Concrete Experience: I have found parenting to be a very tasking job yet important responsibility that one has in a lifetime.Unfortunately, there is no formal education to guide me in parenting; all I have is a handful of literature materials on the subject.