This free eBook goes over the 10 slides every startup pitch deck has to include, based on what we learned from analyzing 500+ pitch decks, including those from Airbnb, Uber and Spotify.
The Pitch Deck Uber Used to Raise $200K
Description
List of startup investors in the FinTech industry, along with their Twitter, LinkedIn, and email addresses.
List of startup investors in the BioTech, Health, and Medicine industries, along with their Twitter, LinkedIn, and email addresses.
List of 250 startup investors in the AI and Machine Learning industries, along with their Twitter, LinkedIn, and email addresses.
Everything you need to raise funding for your startup, including 3,500+ investors, 7 tools, 18 templates and 3 learning resources.
90% of startups fail. Learn how to not to with our weekly guides and stories. Join 40,000+ founders.
As of 2022, ride-hailing service Uber operates in approximately 72 countries and 10,500 cities around the world, but the company didn’t get to this point overnight.
As with most successful startups, Uber began its journey with a pitch deck that founders Garrett Camp and Travis Kalanick created all the way back in 2008 and used to raise their first round of funding the following year.
Uber has changed a lot from its conception and early days — it was originally envisioned and pitched as a luxury alternative to traditional cabs — and is now the world’s largest ride-sharing app, which also offers food and package delivery services and other transportation services.
Because of its vast success, many startups today use the Uber pitch deck as a template for their pitches. This article will go over the deck slide by slide and provide a brief analysis of the content, so you can take away some learnings to apply to your fundraising pitch deck.
The First Uber Pitch Deck from 2008
Uber pitch deck slide 1: title.
The first thing you’ll notice on slide one of the pitch deck is that Uber was originally known as UberCab.
Below the company’s original name is an image of a black Mercedes Benz, flanked on either side by an iPhone and a Blackberry. These images subtly allude to the original intention behind Uber, which was to create a luxury taxi alternative targeted at business professionals.
The last thing on Uber’s original pitch deck’s first slide is the phrase “Next-Generation Car Service,” a tagline about what the service was aiming to be to give potential investors an idea of what was to come in the following slides.
Uber Slide 2: Problem
The second slide in Uber’s pitch deck starts to explain the problems with taxi services in 2008. It mentions aging fleets and inefficient technology, including reliance on radio dispatch technology and the need to hail a taxi by calling a dispatch or flagging one down by hand.
The slide also mentions problems faced by cab drivers, including the lack of any type of GPS coordination for pickups and the significant amounts of dead time spent without any fares.
Ride-sharing services like Uber and those that came after it have drastically changed the face of ride hailing over the last 10+ years, but try to think back to how much more complicated getting a cab was in 2008. This slide laid out the problems with taxis in simple terms that most potential investors could easily relate to back then.
Uber Slide 3: Problem Continued
Uber’s third slide continued explaining the problems with taxi services, specifically how taxi monopolies reduced the quality of cab services, how expensive it was for new drivers to get into the industry, and how little drivers were paid. It also mentioned how there were no incentives for either customers or cab drivers to hold them accountable during rides.
The last sentence on the slide coins a term that would foreshadow what was to come: “Digital Hail,” or a new way to hail cabs digitally and avoid the need to do so in the street. You can see that, by only the third slide, potential investors should have now been very keen to find out what Uber’s solutions to these problems within the ride hailing sector were going to be.
Uber Slide 4: Concept
With potential investors now ready to hear about how Uber planned to disrupt the taxi industry, the next slide in the pitch deck introduced the company’s concept in detail.
The founders pitched Uber as “a fast & efficient on-demand car service,” as well as introduced their target market as professionals in American cities, starting with San Francisco and New York.
The fourth slide also goes on to start explaining how the service will solve some of those previously mentioned problems, including shortening wait times and incentivizing drivers.
You can see in this slide that Uber was originally really focused on pitching a luxury service, similar to what Uber Black is today, to provide a chauffeur-like experience with the convenience of an on-demand cab. Though the initial concept didn’t stick, this would have been interesting to potential investors, as nothing like this existed at the time.
Uber Slide 5: Concept Continued
The next Uber pitch deck slide continued to explain the concept, providing easily-digestible details about how the service would actually work.
The information on this slide directly addresses more of the problems that the deck already mentioned, stating how Uber would be a members only service and establish high levels of trust between clients and drivers, while allowing drivers to work without the high costs associated with driving traditional taxis.
Overall, the length of the information in the pitch deck about Uber’s solution runs a little long. They could have condensed slides four and five into one shorter slide and still gotten the point across.
According to Y Combinator , seed round pitch decks should explain what your company does very clearly, in as few words as possible, and describe the concrete benefits your concept provides. The Uber deck’s slides on their solution are slightly too wordy and could have provided a briefer, more high-level look at the concept.
Uber Slide 6: Key Differentiators
On the sixth slide, Uber’s founders used short bullet points to lay out their concept’s key differentiators in a way potential investors could easily digest. Specifically, the Uber founders are comparing their company to traditional cab companies.
When you’re pitching an idea for a startup to raise funding, slides like this are incredibly important because they allow your audience to skim them and gain a quick understanding of what your idea is and how it is different compared to competitor businesses in the same niche.
Uber Slide 7: Operating Principles
The seventh slide is a place where Uber’s pitch starts to look a little dated. This slide also uses bullet points, but they make somewhat general claims about how the service will operate with no supporting information to back them up.
Phrases like “statistically optimized response time” and the “the best end-user experience possible” show that Uber’s founders had big ambitions, but they fall a little flat here without any elaboration. This was probably an unnecessary slide, or at least one that could have been executed better.
Uber Slide 8: Uber App
The next slide states that Uber will work using a 1-click request app from geo-aware devices, such as those pictured below the text. This slide also says that you would be able to send an SMS text to request a pickup from any phone, which is something that never manifested.
Another thing to note about slide eight is that it doesn’t include real mockups of what the Uber app would look like. If you’re going to include images of devices that an app is going to function on, the best practice is to edit them to show a mockup of one or more screens of the app.
Uber Slide 9: Uber Website
The ninth Uber pitch slide explains how the services website would work, stating that you would be able to book pre-scheduled trips and set default pickup locations, such as “home” and “work.”
At the time, these would have been exciting features for potential investors to hear about because there were no other online services that allowed people to schedule rides and store GPS information about their locations for ease of use.
The image on this slide also gave the audience a sneak-peak of how users could view the locations of nearby Uber fleet drivers, which was a nice visual touch.
Uber Slide 10: Use Cases
Next, we see another text-only slide that uses clear, concise bullet points to illustrate potential use cases for Uber. There’s nothing too surprising here, and the use cases are all pretty plausible, other than the bullet point about working while commuting with in-car WiFi — this is another feature from the original luxury ride concept for Uber that never came to life.
Other than the WiFi, all the use cases on this slide are things people use Uber for today. Use cases like these are very important to include in any pitch deck to help potential investors envision where your product can fit into the market and how people will actually use it.
Uber Slide 11: User Benefits
The 11th slide in Uber’s original pitch deck is a bit confusing. It starts off with saying “cabs don’t guarantee pickup,” which doesn’t seem like it’s necessarily true. After all, if you call a cab service and request a pickup, they will dispatch a car to you, though it’s true that it can take a long time for them to arrive.
The other points about car services being slow and expensive are true enough, and the slide concludes by framing Uber as a sort of happy medium between a taxi and a limo service. Overall, this is another slide that could have probably been left out or done differently, as the user benefits should have already been pretty clear from earlier slides.
Uber Slide 12: Environmental Benefits
In slide 12, Uber’s founders emphasize how Uber will have a positive effect on the environment. They stated that, since drivers don’t have to drive around searching for fares, vehicle resources would be used more efficiently. The slide also mentions the use of more efficient hybrid vehicles and the option to carpool with other riders to reduce carbon footprints.
This is all good information to include in a pitch deck, as many prospective investors want to know what the environmental impact of your business could potentially be. Concern about the environment has certainly grown since 2009, too, so environmental impact info is more important than ever.
Uber Slide 13: Fleet Info
Moving on to slide 13, we see some information about the cars Uber originally intended to use for their fleet, which also supports some of the environmental information from the previous slide by showing the fuel efficiency of the cars.
It seems that Uber’s founders originally intended to own their driver’s cars, or at least regulate what types of cars they could use. As you probably know, Uber vehicles now come in all shapes and sizes, so this is another initial plan that didn’t come to fruition. This slide was perhaps a little too specific and didn’t really seem to add a lot to the pitch.
Uber Slide 14: Initial Service Area
There’s not a lot to take in on the 14th slide. It includes important information about where Uber would operate initially, which was to be San Francisco followed by New York. This is important information for investors to know because it’s a common practice for startups to test their product in a specific niche or market before growing to others, and the market or niche they choose can affect investors’ decisions.
In the case of Uber, opting to start out in major US cities on the East and West Coasts, both of which have large potential customer bases of business people, was a well-calculated decision that surely contributed to the company’s initial success.
Uber Slide 15: Technology
On slide 15, the Uber pitch deck elaborates a bit more on the technology the company planned to use. Though the bullet points are kind of vague, this slide likely provided some important talking points for the presenters.
However, it’s a good practice for pitch decks to only contain information that can be understood at a glance, without requiring it to be presented by founders. Pitch decks generally get shared between and referred back to by investors and other stakeholders, so it’s important that all the information in them makes sense without someone talking about them and providing context and explanations.
Uber Slide 16: Demand Forecasting
This slide offers some more technological information about how Uber’s fleet cars would sit in optimal locations to minimize expected pickup times based on things like the day, time, weather, and traffic conditions. This is another thing that changed, since Uber doesn’t control where their drivers wait to pick up fares, but it was likely an interesting concept to investors, since traditional taxi companies did not employ any such AI-based tech.
Uber Slide 17: Market Info
Uber’s 17th slide provides information about the size of the taxi and limousine service market’s revenue.
The idea with a slide such as this one is to convince investors that your startup is in a large enough market for it to at least grow into a unicorn (a company valued at $1B+), which is what most venture capitalists are interested in investing in.
The numbers here are just an estimate of the market size and they will almost never be 100% accurate, but the main point is to tell investors a data-backed story about the market in which your startup business operates ( here’s a short guide on how to estimate market size).
Uber Slide 18: Market Info Continued
The next slide shows a pie chart breaking down the percentage of rides to the airport vs. those not to the airport, and the percentage of those that are for retail vs. business. It’s not clear how this affected Uber’s concept, so this perhaps wasn’t a particularly necessary slide.
If you’re going to include a slide like this in your pitch deck, it’s better to at least have a couple of bullet points explaining how the data relates to your project and opportunities. Remember that you want anyone who skims through your deck to understand it without needing you to give them an explanation.
Uber Slide 19: Target Cities
On slide 19, the Uber pitch deck repeats that the initial target cities were intended to be SF and NYC. The slide then lists a few other major cities to expand to. This slide could have easily been combined with the Initial Service Area slide from earlier in the pitch for conciseness.
Uber Slide 20: Potential Outcomes
The 20th slide of Uber’s pitch deck lists potential outcomes of the company’s business model.
The best-case scenario that the founders speculated on was that the company would become a market leader and make $1B+ in annual revenue. The worst-case scenario was that the company wouldn’t achieve its goal of expanding beyond San Francisco, and that it would remain a small, high-end transportation service for executives in the city.
This is an important slide for investors to see because it gives them some realistic possibilities for what can happen if they invest, helping them to make a decision about backing the startup.
Though it took until 2015 to start earning over $1B in annual revenue, Uber now pulls in more than $14B annually. So it’s safe to say their best-case scenario eventually came true.
Uber Slide 21: Smartphone Info
The next slide shows a couple of charts about smartphone usage in the US as of August 2008. This just provided potential investors some relevant stats about the ever-growing opportunities for mobile apps.
From today’s perspective, you might think this is another unnecessary slide. But, you have to remember that when Uber was conceived, in 2008, it was far less common for people to order things like cabs through their smartphones.
Uber’s founders added this slide to show how smartphone usage was growing back then, as a way to back their market size and potential outcome estimations to investors.
Uber Slide 22: Future Optimizations
On slide 22, the deck goes into some ideas for optimizing the Uber app down the road. This is extra information that some investors may have appreciated, but it feels like it could have been left out of Uber’s first pitch deck and saved for a later funding round when the app was actually up and running.
Uber Slide 23: Marketing Ideas
On the following slide, we see some potential ideas for how to market Uber’s service. This slide feels a bit like a sheet of notes from a brainstorming session. It probably would have been better to include concrete marketing activities planned for the app’s launch.
Showing investors some of the different ideas you have for growing an early-stage business isn’t a bad idea, but it would work better if you’re able to show them active growth strategies and channels, instead of a random assortment of unconnected marketing ideas.
Uber Slide 24: Location-Based Service
The second-to-last slide in Uber’s pitch deck states their plans to eventually expand the app’s infrastructure to other location-based services, such as delivery. If you’ve ever used Uber Eats, you know this is something that came true! This is a good slide to include at the end of a pitch because it leaves investors thinking about the company’s potential for growth.
Uber Slide 25: Progress to Date
Last but not least, we have a slide with some bullet points listing everything Uber had done to date to bring its vision to life. This is definitely important information to show potential investors, who want to see progress being made in order to actually commit money to a project.
Missing Slides in Uber’s Pitch Deck
Business model.
Uber’s founders didn’t include any type of slide in their original pitch deck about the business model, with concrete details about pricing, operating costs, profit margins, and other information investors like to know. Even if they’re just initial estimates, it’s good to include a slide with at least some of this information in your startup pitch.
These days, it’s a best practice to include a slide with a brief summary of the key team members, including the founders and anyone else vital to the development of the project. This puts a face to the company for investors and gives them a better idea of how qualified the team is to solve the problem they claim to be able to solve.
A slide with info about deal terms isn’t necessarily a standard slide to include in pitch decks, but some investors appreciate having this information during a presentation. Deal terms can include things like how much money your company needs initially to kickstart it and what investors could expect in return.
Uber Pitch Deck Templates
If you like the way Uber’s original pitch deck worked and think you could try something similar for your next startup fundraising pitch, you can try using one of the editable Uber pitch deck PDF templates below:
- Slidebean’s template
- Beautiful.ai’s template
- Venngage’s template
If you do try out one of the pitch deck templates above, consider removing and/or combining some of the slides to cut down the overall length of the presentation and make the info more concise.
In 2022, there are more startups than ever for investors to choose from, so you really want to make your first pitch pack a punch in a short amount of time and include only the most relevant information.
Final Thoughts
Overall, Uber’s pitch deck did lots of things well, though it could have been shorter — the recommended length for startup pitch decks is 12 to 14 slides, and Uber’s deck was a whopping 25 slides long.
Where Uber’s founders could have really cut down the length of the deck was in the slides about the company’s app and solution. They should have described the solution and the user benefits of using Uber vs. traditional cabs in two or three slides, instead of in six plus as they did.
That being said, the deck was thorough and included all the key information potential investors would have wanted to know for an early-stage startup. And, investors at Uber’s first pitch deck presentation liked it well enough to offer the company an initial round of seed funding, totaling $200K.
90% of startups fail. Learn how not to with our weekly guides and stories. Join +40,000 other startup founders!
An all-in-one newsletter for startup founders, ruled by one philosophy: there's more to learn from failures than from successes.
100+ resources you need for building a successful startup, divided into 4 categories: Fundraising, People, Product, and Growth.
Uber Pitch Deck
Ride sharing company Uber is famous today, and is a stellar success story. Thanks to their success, the initial Uber pitch deck is an in-demand resource for new entrepreneurs looking to build a startup. Uber shared their pitch deck less than a decade after founding the company.
In 2008, Uber started with $1.25 million in seed funding from investors, but they relied heavily on a presentation to do so. While successful, the original Uber pitch deck was a snooze, so we updated it using Beautiful.ai.
Check out the Uber Pitch Deck redesigned in Beautiful.ai
Take the Uber pitch deck as an example: a well-designed pitch deck template can seal the deal for the growth of your project or startup. It's important to craft a document worthy of attention to achieve your goals. Our Uber pitch deck refresh used tables, graphs, charts, and other graphics to grab attention and illustrate important data. Each of these can easily be added and customized to your template. Here are some slides you could include:
Pro Tips for Creating Your Own Pitch Deck
A strong pitch deck, like the Uber pitch, not only serves to reinforce your brand to investors. It also demonstrates that you understand what your business is and who your customers are. Here are some things to consider:
Engage potential investors by telling an exciting story. Talk about how your startup got its start or the connection you have to the problem you’re solving.
Use graphics, photos, carts, and videos to bring your story to life. Visuals capture your audience’s interest and can help you tell your story in impactful, memorable ways.
A pitch deck should be clear, compelling, and straightforward. About 10 to 20 slides should be enough to hit all the key points.
Picking the right photos and images is essential to the overall success of your presentation. Be sure to pick images that tell a story and enhance understanding.
More Popular Templates
Airbnb Pitch Deck
This Airbnb pitch deck example shows how simple presentations can share information quickly and effectively through beautiful design.
Training Presentation Example
Use our training presentation example and template to guide your next training session, coaching session, or webinar.
Social Media Report Template
Use a social media report template to present social media findings to your team, upper management, or new clients.
Agile Workflow Presentation Template
Learn how Beautiful.ai’s agile workflow template can help teams examine their current processes and look for ways to improve them.
Mixpanel Pitch Deck
Mixpanel is a business analytics company that helps measure user engagement and retention. We took a look at Mixpanel’s original pitch deck to look for ways to improve the design.
Young Professional Digital Resume Template
A young professional digital resume is an interactive resume to help you stand out to potential employers. Land your first job with our digital resume presentation template.
Uber Pitch Deck Made Better (Customizable as Template)
Explore our enhanced Uber pitch deck template, based on the original that raised $200K. Gain insights and tips for creating your successful pitch deck.
8 minute read
helped business professionals at:
Short answer
What makes the original Uber pitch deck so effective?
The original Uber pitch deck's effectiveness lies in its clear value proposition, concise market analysis, and compelling vision for revolutionizing transportation.
Its straightforward approach and strong storytelling captivate investors, showcasing Uber's potential for disruptive innovation.
Uber’s pitch deck shares a great idea, but it’s ready for a style update
The original Uber pitch deck is a masterclass in sharing a big vision. It's the kind of story that grabs attention and doesn't let go, showing us all how a simple idea can change the world.
But, while the first pitch deck of Uber was groundbreaking at its time, it now feels a touch dated in its look and feel.
In this blog post, we're going to give Uber's iconic pitch deck a modern makeover, turning it into an interactive journey that's more in line with how today's audiences consume content.
Join me as I walk through the transformation of Uber's pitch deck, showing you the before and after, and sharing tips on how you can spruce up your own slides.
Here’s a sneak peek at the original deck (left) and its updated version (right):
You need to elevate your pitch to ignite investors’ interest
Imagine a world where catching a ride was as simple as pressing a button on your phone. That was Uber's game-changing idea back in 2008.
With a clear vision and a compelling pitch, they turned a simple concept into a global revolution in urban mobility, kicking off with $200,000 in seed funding.
These days, snagging someone's attention is just the start. The real challenge? Keeping it.
Picture this: an investor glances at your pitch deck. You've got 15 seconds to make an impression. If Uber had just sent out their deck and hoped for the best, we might not be hailing rides with our smartphones today.
Think of your pitch deck as your story's best friend. It's there to do the talking when you can't.
But it's got to be more than just words on a screen. Crafting an interactive pitch deck is about weaving a narrative that resonates, ensuring your vision sticks with people long after they've moved on from your slides.
Uber pitch deck (interactive remake):
Disclaimer: The insights provided are inspired by Uber's publicly available initial pitch deck . It has been recreated for illustrative purposes by the Storydoc team and does not reflect the exact deck Uber used for their fundraising efforts.
How we improved the original Uber pitch deck
Let's take a closer look at how we've given Uber's original pitch deck a major upgrade.
We've improved the storyline and ramped up the visuals to bring you a step-by-step breakdown of the changes that can take a decent pitch to the next level.
I'm here to walk you through these improvements, showing you how to apply them to your deck to make it stand out and stick with your audience.
1) Cover slide
When Uber first hit the scene with its pitch deck, it went by "UberCab," and its cover slide was pretty straightforward.
Picture this: a sleek Mercedes and a Blackberry phone right there on the front page. It was clear from the get-go that Uber wasn't your average taxi service; it was something new, something modern.
Fast forward to today, and we've given that cover slide a bit of a facelift with Storydoc's touch. First off, we've updated Uber's name to reflect its current brand, keeping it crisp and simple.
But here's where it gets really exciting: we swapped out those static images for a dynamic video. Why? Because videos have this unique power to draw people in.
In fact, decks with a video right on the cover slide see a whopping 32% more engagement .
Imagine starting your pitch with a video that captures the essence of Uber, showing the bustling streets or happy customers. It sets the stage for everything that's to follow.
And we didn't stop there. We added a little note about the average reading time for the whole deck.
It turns out, just by letting folks know up front how much time they'll need, you can reduce the chance of them bouncing off by 24% . It's like giving them a heads-up, "Hey, stick around, it's worth it," and it works.
2) Problem slide
Originally, Uber's pitch deck tackled the taxi industry's issues across two separate slides, which risked diluting the audience's focus.
The slides laid out the inefficiencies and frustrations with traditional taxi services, but the split could potentially weaken the impact of the message.
In our revamped version, we've streamlined these insights into a single, more powerful slide.
By employing design strategies like grayed-out content transitions, narrated storytelling, or a quadrant layout, you can make the transition between points smoother and more engaging.
This not only keeps the narrative tight but also ensures that the audience's attention is captured and held from start to finish.
Moreover, the original slides included a graph meant to illustrate the high cost of NYC medallions, but let's be honest, it was pretty hard to decipher.
Recognizing the importance of data in storytelling, we offer an extensive library of interactive data visualization tools you can use instead.
This way, viewers can interact with the data themselves, exploring the specifics at their own pace. This makes the information clearer, adds an engaging, hands-on element to the presentation, and sets the stage for Uber’s solution to shine.
3) Solution slide
When Uber first laid out its solution, it was spread across several slides, packed with walls of text. It was thorough, sure, but it risked losing the audience in the details.
Imagine trying to catch a glimpse of the city skyline through a thick fog—that's how it felt navigating through the original solution slides.
So, we took a step back and thought, "How can we clear the fog?"
First up, we set the stage with a "Why invest in Uber?" slide. Picture this as the moment the sun starts to peek through, highlighting the key metrics that make Uber shine.
Then, we tackled the solution itself, condensing the essence into 2 crisp slides:
On the first slide, we mapped out Uber's world using quadrants , each representing a different service. For those who love to explore, you can add expandable text sections that let you dive deeper into each area without cluttering the slides.
The second slide is where the journey begins. Using scroll-based design, you can explore Uber's main features and benefits one by one at your own pace. There are also image and video placeholders to present the solution in action.
By repackaging Uber's solution into this streamlined, engaging format, we’ve made it easier for the audience to grasp and remember Uber’s offerings.
And, more importantly, giving readers something to play around with means that your deck will get scrolled to the bottom 41% more often and read 21% longer .
4) Market size slide
Uber's original market size slide, packed with numbers and a simple pie chart, was informative but a bit dry. It was like reading a dense report when you really wanted a clear, engaging story.
So, we switched things up with an interactive data visualization component that fills with real-time data. This interactive approach transforms the slide from a static snapshot into a lively exploration.
It's about making the audience active participants, turning what could be a forgettable list of numbers into a memorable, hands-on experience.
Now, understanding Uber's market size and segments is not just easier but also a lot more fun.
5) Traction slide
In the original pitch, Uber spread its story thin across several slides, touching on future hopes and what they'd achieved so far.
Fast forward to today, and we've got a whole saga of success to share. So, we thought, why not make it easier and more engaging for everyone?
We packed Uber's milestones into one timeline slide. It's like a road trip through Uber's history, where every stop is a major win or a breakthrough moment.
This visual journey makes it easy to see just how far Uber has come, turning a list of dates into a compelling story of growth and innovation.
For the success part, we went with running numbers. Picture this: numbers that climb right before your eyes, showcasing Uber's annual revenue, year-on-year user growth, and customer satisfaction rate.
It's not just numbers on a slide; it's a live show of Uber's growth, making the scale of their achievements instantly clear and far more impactful.
By focusing on a timeline and interactive numbers, we've made Uber's progress and success not just easier to grasp but impossible to ignore.
It's a fresh, lively way to highlight just how big a deal Uber is, turning dry data into a dynamic narrative that captures the essence of their journey.
6) Next steps slide
The original Uber pitch deck, while groundbreaking, left out several key slides that could have painted a fuller picture of the company's vision and strategy.
Important elements like the business model, the team behind the magic, how they planned to use their investments, and crucially, clear next steps were missing.
Recognizing these gaps, we saw an opportunity to not just fill them in but to do so in a way that significantly boosts engagement and action.
We capped our deck off with a smart call to action (CTA) that's more than just a polite "thank you."
We embedded a calendar directly into the deck, allowing investors to book a meeting with Uber's team right there and then. This direct approach transforms passive interest into active engagement.
Our analysis of various pitch decks revealed a striking insight: decks with a singular, clear next step, like booking a demo or signing up, boasted a conversion rate 27% higher than those ending with a generic thank you.
It's a testament to the power of a well-placed CTA, turning viewers into participants and potential leads into concrete actions.
And that’s it!
If you’d like more insights on how to create a fundable pitch deck, we’ve put together several guides for you:
Creating Fundable Pitch Decks as Advised by VCs (+Templates)
10 Slides to Include in a Pitch Deck (All Investors Want)
How to Make an Outstanding Pitch Deck with AI
Pitch Deck Examples That Win Where 99% Fail (+Templates)
Famous Pitch Deck Examples to Steal From (+Templates)
Best Pitch Deck Software Every Founder Needs
Give your own pitch deck a makeover
Looking to transform your pitch into something as impressive as Uber's? You've come to the right place!
Take a look at our wide selection of pitch deck templates , each designed for different needs, to find the perfect one that tells your story just right.
Our easy-to-follow editor will guide you through turning your pitch from good to great, effortlessly.
Or, if you'd rather, upload your deck and get tailored advice from our storytelling expert on how to polish it up.
Hi, I'm Dominika, Content Specialist at Storydoc. As a creative professional with experience in fashion, I'm here to show you how to amplify your brand message through the power of storytelling and eye-catching visuals.
Found this post useful?
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter.
Get notified as more awesome content goes live.
(No spam, no ads, opt-out whenever)
You've just joined an elite group of people that make the top performing 1% of sales and marketing collateral.
Create your best pitch deck to date.
Stop losing opportunities to ineffective presentations. Your new amazing deck is one click away!
Browser not supported
This probably isn't the experience you were expecting. Internet Explorer isn't supported on Uber.com. Try switching to a different browser to view our site.
We reimagine the way the world moves for the better
Movement is what we power. It’s our lifeblood. It runs through our veins. It’s what gets us out of bed each morning. It pushes us to constantly reimagine how we can move better. For you. For all the places you want to go. For all the things you want to get. For all the ways you want to earn. Across the entire world. In real time. At the incredible speed of now.
We are Uber. The go-getters. The kind of people who are relentless about our mission to help people go anywhere and get anything and earn their way. Movement is what we power. It’s our lifeblood. It runs through our veins. It’s what gets us out of bed each morning. It pushes us to constantly reimagine how we can move better. For you. For all the places you want to go. For all the things you want to get. For all the ways you want to earn. Across the entire world. In real time. At the incredible speed of now.
We are a tech company that connects the physical and digital worlds to help make movement happen at the tap of a button. Because we believe in a world where movement should be accessible. So you can move and earn safely. In a way that’s sustainable for our planet. And regardless of your gender, race, religion, abilities, or sexual orientation, we champion your right to move and earn freely and without fear. Of course, we haven’t always gotten it right. But we’re not afraid of failure, because it makes us better, wiser, and stronger. And it makes us even more committed to do the right thing by our customers, local communities and cities, and our incredibly diverse set of international partners.
The idea for Uber was born on a snowy night in Paris in 2008, and ever since then our DNA of reimagination and reinvention carries on. We’ve grown into a global platform powering flexible earnings and the movement of people and things in ever expanding ways. We’ve gone from connecting rides on 4 wheels to 2 wheels to 18-wheel freight deliveries. From takeout meals to daily essentials to prescription drugs to just about anything you need at any time and earning your way. From drivers with background checks to real-time verification, safety is a top priority every single day. At Uber, the pursuit of reimagination is never finished, never stops, and is always just beginning.
A letter from our CEO
Read about our team’s commitment to provide everyone on our global platform with the technology that can help them move ahead.
- Sustainability
Uber is committing to becoming a fully electric, zero-emission platform by 2040, with 100% of rides taking place in zero-emission vehicles, on public transit, or with micromobility. It is our responsibility as the largest mobility platform in the world to more aggressively tackle the challenge of climate change. We will do this by offering riders more ways to ride green, helping drivers go electric, making transparency a priority and partnering with NGOs and the private sector to help expedite a clean and just energy transition.
Rides and beyond
In addition to helping riders find a way to go from point A to point B, we're helping people order food quickly and affordably, removing barriers to healthcare, creating new freight-booking solutions, and helping companies provide a seamless employee travel experience. And always helping drivers and couriers earn.
Your safety drives us
Whether you’re in the back seat or behind the wheel, your safety is essential. We are committed to doing our part, and technology is at the heart of our approach. We partner with safety advocates and develop new technologies and systems to help improve safety and help make it easier for everyone to get around.
Company info
Who's driving uber.
We’re building a culture within Uber that emphasizes doing the right thing, period, for riders, drivers, and employees. Find out more about the team that’s leading the way.
Getting diversity right
It’s our goal to create a workplace that is inclusive and reflects the diversity of the cities we serve—where everyone can be their authentic self, and where that authenticity is celebrated as a strength. By creating an environment where people from every background can thrive, we’ll make Uber a better company—for our employees and our customers.
Acting with integrity
Uber's Ethics & Compliance Program Charter outlines our commitment to integrity at the highest levels within the company. Transparency is critical to an ethical culture; we achieve this through our Integrity Helpline and suite of scalable and effective compliance initiatives.
Keep up with the latest
Get announcements about partnerships, app updates, initiatives, and more near you and around the world.
Find new places to explore and learn about Uber products, partnerships, and more.
- Investor relations
Download financial reports, see next-quarter plans, and read about our corporate responsibility initiatives.
Come reimagine with us
- Our offerings
- How Uber works
- Diversity, equity, and inclusion
Sign up to drive & deliver
Create a rider account, order delivery with uber eats, sign up for uber for business, sign in to drive & deliver, sign in to ride, sign in to order delivery with uber eats, sign in to your uber for business account, drive & deliver, uber for business, manage account.
- All templates
Uber Pitch Deck Template
838416 uses
AI generated Pitch Deck 🤖
The following Uber pitch deck template follows the traditional order of slides recommended by accelerators and successful startups. But first things first: what must a pitch deck contain? Is there a standard? Yes, actually there is. There's really no need to reinvent the wheel here. So, before we dig deep in our Uber pitch deck template, let's review the pitch deck outline.
What does a Pitch Deck contain?
- Problem slide
- Product Demo
- Market Size
- Business Model
- Competition
- Underlying Magic
- Go-to Market
- Fundraising Information
The Uber pitch deck template
Nine years after founding Uber, Garret Camp (co-founder) shared the pitch via Medium. We took the liberty of redesigning (using our AI button ) the original Uber pitch deck to make it look better. As we are all aware of how big Uber became, their pitch deck has become a major reference for anyone building a startup.
The Uber pitch deck template can be divided in three sections.
The slides teardown
Don't forget that the initial part of your presentation is critical, as it is your chance to catch your audience's attention. Make sure to add the following information in your slides:
- Problem: summarize the problem you are tackling. Use short and to-the-point and down to earth statements.
- Proposed solution: you and your company. Mention how you will address the problem. Again, less is more. Get to the point quickly using words everyone will understand.
- Product demo: be careful when presenting live. If anything goes wrong, then the whole meeting goes down the drain. Stick to a video and to the safest solutions.
- Market Size: How large can your company be? In this Uber Pitch Deck template, you can see that they decided to start in San Francisco and New York, before expanding to other big cities. This is a market that could result in $1.3 Billion. This allowed them to visualize a best, a realistic and a worst case scenario. Who would have thought that their prediction fell incredibly short from what really happened?
Wrapping it up
- Business Model.
- Competition slide: inspired in Steve Job's keynote, we recommend using a grid-approach to compare yourself to your competitors.
- Underlying magic: talk about the technology you have developed to create your product. You can get more technical here. Specifically on Uber: this is were they talk about their route optimization, their tracking technology and their not-so-loved surges.
- Go-to-market: your company's marketing ideas.
- Team slide: mention your founders and a short bio.
- Traction slides: add your sales and revenue in a clear and straight forward chart.
- Fundraising slide: Uber added this slide where they specify how much money they were asking at the time.
You can download a PDF version of the redesigned Uber pitch deck template here, or you can use create a free Slidebean account here to use this template online and edit it as wished.
Most popular templates
The Startup Pitch Deck Template
978574 uses
Airbnb Pitch Deck Template
976263 uses
Investor Deck Template
625510 uses
Sequoia Pitch Deck Template
593672 uses
Investment Proposal Template
483182 uses
Need a hand?
to access the full template
Uber Pitch Deck (+Free PPT & PDF Download)
Get the Uber pitch deck template with a free open-sourced design. As the most successful startup in the gig economy, Uber has revolutionized the transportation and delivery industry. While the original Uber deck from 2008 might look a bit dated, we modernized for you to use for free so you can focus on revolutionizing your own industry!
Fund Your Startup with an Updated Version of the Pitch Deck that Changed the World
With a total funding amount of just over $25 Billion, Uber has raised more capital than nearly any other startup. While they no longer need a pitch deck, their early versions were critical to conveying their revolutionary idea and securing the funding needed to make it a reality.
FREE Open-Sourced Design
Uber's original pitch deck did a great job of explaining a relatively new concept at the time. It's one of the newest decks on this list, so it didn't need as much work redesigning it. Because of this, the format is very similar to the original, and all best practices were maintained. The modern version is free to use, so take some time to make it yours.
Want a copy?
Simply submit the resources form and we'll send you a download link to the resource for free!
Related Resources
How to Build a Killer Pitch Deck (+ Free Template)
How to Raise Venture Capital in 2024 (Complete Guide)
Building a Pitch Deck? Here's the software you should use.
What to Prepare Before Pitching Investors
- SUGGESTED TOPICS
- The Magazine
- Newsletters
- Managing Yourself
- Managing Teams
- Work-life Balance
- The Big Idea
- Data & Visuals
- Reading Lists
- Case Selections
- HBR Learning
- Topic Feeds
- Account Settings
- Email Preferences
Share Podcast
Uber’s Strategy for Global Success
How can Uber adapt its business model to compete in unique global markets?
- Apple Podcasts
As Uber entered unique regional markets around the world – from New York to Shanghai, it has adapted its business model to comply with regulations and compete locally. As the transportation landscape evolves, how can Uber adapt its business model to stay competitive in the long term?
Harvard Business School assistant professor Alexander MacKay describes Uber’s global market strategy and responses by regulators and local competitors in his case, “ Uber: Competing Globally .”
HBR Presents is a network of podcasts curated by HBR editors, bringing you the best business ideas from the leading minds in management. The views and opinions expressed are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Harvard Business Review or its affiliates.
BRIAN KENNY: The theory of disruptive innovation was first coined by Harvard Business School professor Clayton Christensen in his 1997 book, The Innovator’s Dilemma . The theory explains the phenomenon by which an innovation transforms an existing market or sector by introducing simplicity, convenience, and affordability where complication and high cost are the status quo. Think Netflix disrupting the video rental space. Over the years, the term has been applied liberally and not always correctly to other examples, but every so often, an idea comes along that really fits the bill. Enter Uber, the ridesharing behemoth that turned the car service industry on its head. In a few short years after launching in 2010, Uber became the largest car service in the world, as measured in ride count. Last year, Uber drove 6.2 billion riders. Today’s case takes us to London in 2019, where Uber is facing the latest in a long list of challenges from regulators threatening their ability to continue operating in that important market. In this episode of Cold Call , we welcome Alexander MacKay to discuss the case entitled, “Uber: Competing Globally.” I’m your host, Brian Kenny, and you’re listening to Cold Call on the HBR Presents network.
Alexander MacKay is in the strategy unit at Harvard Business School. His research focuses on matters of competition, including pricing, demand, and market structure. Alex, thanks for joining us on Cold Call today.
ALEX MACKAY: Thank you, Brian. Very happy to be here.
BRIAN KENNY: The idea of Uber seems so simple, but it was revolutionary in so many ways. And Uber has been in the headlines many times for both good and bad reasons in its decade of existence. So we’re going to touch on a lot of those things today. So thanks for sharing the case with us.
ALEX MACKAY: Brian, I’m very happy to. It’s a little funny, we’ve actually started to see the first few students who have never hailed a traditional taxi in our classrooms. So I think increasingly, the contrast between the two is going to be pretty difficult for people to fully understand.
BRIAN KENNY: Let me ask you to start by telling us what your cold call would be when you set up the class here.
ALEX MACKAY: The case starts off with the current legal battle going on in London. And so the first question I just ask to start the classroom is: What’s the end game for Uber in London? What do they look like 10 years from now? In the midst of this ongoing legal battle, there has been back and forth, some give and take from both sides, Transportation for London, and also on the Uber side as well. And there’s actually a recent court case that has allowed Uber to have a little more time to operate. They bought about 18 more months of time, but this has been also brought with additional, stricter scrutiny, and 18 months from now, they’re going to be at it again trying to figure out exactly what rules Uber’s allowed to operate under.
BRIAN KENNY: It seems like 18 months in the lifetime of Uber is like a decade. Everything seems to happen so quickly for this company. That’s a long period of time. What made you decide to write this case? How does it relate to the work that you’re doing in your research?
ALEX MACKAY: A big focus of my research is on competition policy, particularly the realms of antitrust and regulation. And here we have a company, Uber, whose relationship with regulation has been really essential to its strategy from day one. And I think appreciating the effects of regulation and how its impact Uber’s performance in different markets, is really critical for understanding strategy and global strategy broadly.
BRIAN KENNY: Let’s just talk a little bit about Uber. I think people are familiar with it, but they may not be familiar with just how large they are in this space. And the space that they’ve sort of created has also blown up and expanded in many ways. So how big is Uber? Like what’s the landscape of ridesharing look like and where does Uber sit in that landscape?
ALEX MACKAY: Uber globally is the biggest ridesharing company. In 2018, they had over $10 billion in revenue for both ridesharing and their Uber Eats platform. And you mentioned in the introduction, that they had over 6 billion rides in 2019. That’s greater than 15 million rides every day that’s happening on their platform. So really, just an enormous company.
BRIAN KENNY: So they started back in 2010. It’s been kind of an amazing decade of growth for them. How do you explain that kind of rapid expansion?
ALEX MACKAY: They were financed early on with some angel investors. I think Kalanick’s background really helped there to get some early funding. But one of the critical things that allowed them to expand early into many markets that helped their growth was they’re a relatively asset light company. On the ground, they certainly need sales teams, they need translation work to move into different markets, but because the main asset they were providing in these different markets was software, and drivers were bringing their own cars and riders were bringing their own phones, the key pieces of hardware that you need to operate this market, they really didn’t have to invest a ton of capital. In fact, when they launched in Paris, they launched as sort of a prototype, just to show, “Hey, we can do this in Paris without too much difficulty,” as their first international market. So being able to really scale it across different markets really allowed them to grow. I think by 2015, their market cap was $60 billion, five years after founding, which is just an incredible rate of growth.
BRIAN KENNY: So they’re the biggest car service in the world, but they don’t own any cars. Like what business are they really in, I guess is the question?
ALEX MACKAY: They’re certainly in the business of matching riders to drivers. They’ve been able to do this in a way that doesn’t require them to own cars, just through the use of technology. And so what they’re doing, and this is I think pretty well understood, is that they’re using existing capital, people who have cars that may be going unused, personal cars, and Uber is able to use that and deploy that to give riding services to different customers. Whereas in the traditional taxi model, you could have taxis that you didn’t necessarily own, but you leased them or you rented them, but they had the express purpose of being driven for taxi services. And so it wasn’t using idle capital. You kind of had to create additional capital in order to provide the services.
BRIAN KENNY: So you mentioned Travis Kalanick a little bit earlier, but he was one of the co-founders of the company, and the case goes a little bit into his philosophy of what expansion into new markets should look like. Can you talk a little bit about that?
ALEX MACKAY: Certainly. Yeah. And I think it might even be helpful to talk a bit about his background, which I think provides a little more context before Uber. He dropped out of UCLA to work on his first company, Scour, and that was a peer-to-peer file sharing service, a lot like Napster, and actually predated Napster. And where he was operating was sort of an evolving legal gray area. Eventually, Scour got sued for $250 billion by a collection of entertainment companies and had to file for bankruptcy.
BRIAN KENNY: Wow.
ALEX MACKAY: He followed that up with his next venture, Red Swoosh, and that was software aimed at allowing users to share network bandwidth. So again, it was a little bit ahead of its time, making use of recent advances in technology. Early on though, they got in trouble with the IRS. They weren’t withholding taxes, and there were some other issues with his co-founder, and there was sort of a bad breakup between the two. Despite this, he persevered and ended up selling the company for $23 million in 2007. And after that, his next big thing was Uber. So one thing I just want to point out is that at all three of these companies, he was looking to do something that leveraged new technology to change the world. And by nature, sometimes businesses like that operate in a legal gray area and you have very difficult decisions to make. Some other decisions you have to make are clearly unethical and there’s really no reason to make some of those decisions, like with the taxes and with some other things that came out later on at Uber, but certainly one of the things that any founder who’s looking to change the world with a big new technology company has to deal with, is that often, the legal framework and the regulatory framework around what you’re trying to do isn’t well established.
BRIAN KENNY: Obviously drama seems to follow Travis where he goes. And his expansion strategy was pretty aggressive. It was almost like a warlike mentality in terms of going into a new market. And you could sort of sum it up as saying ask forgiveness. Is that fair?
ALEX MACKAY: Yeah. Yeah. Ask for forgiveness, not permission. I think they were really focused on winning. I think that was sort of their ultimate goal. We describe in the case there’s this policy of principle confrontation, to ignore existing regulations until you receive pushback. And then when you do receive pushback, either from local regulators or existing sort of taxicab drivers, mobilize a response to sort of confront that. During their beta launch in 2010, they received a cease-and-desist letter from the city of San Francisco. And they essentially just ignored this letter. They rebranded, they used to be UberCab, and they just took “Cab” out of their name, so now they’re Uber. And you can see their perspective in their press release in response to this. They say, “UberCab is a first to market cutting edge transportation technology, and it must be recognized that the regulations from both city and state regulatory bodies have not been written with these innovations in mind. As such, we are happy to help educate the regulatory bodies on this new generation of technology and work closely with both agencies to ensure compliance.”
BRIAN KENNY: It’s a little arrogant.
ALEX MACKAY: Yeah, so you can see right there, they’re saying, what we’re operating in is sort of this new technology-based realm and the regulators don’t really understand what’s going on. And so instead of complying with the existing regulations, we’re going to try to push regulations to fit what we’re trying to do.
BRIAN KENNY: The case is pretty epic in terms of it sort of cuts a sweeping arc across the world, looking at the challenges that they faced with each market they entered, and none more interesting I think the New York City, which is obviously an enormous market. Can you talk a little bit about some of the challenges they faced going into New York with the cab industry being as prevalent as it was and is?
ALEX MACKAY: Yeah, absolutely. I mean, I think it’s pretty well known for people who are familiar with New York that there were restrictions on the number of medallions which allowed taxis to operate. So there was a limited number of taxis that could drive around New York City. This restriction had really driven up the value of these medallions to the taxi owners. And if you had the experience of taking taxis in New York City prior to the advent of Uber, what you’d find is that there were some areas where the service was very, very good. Downtown, Midtown Manhattan, you could almost always find a taxi, but there are other parts of the city where it was very difficult at times to find a cab. And when you got in a cab, you weren’t sure that you were always going to be given a fair ride. And so Uber coming in and providing this technology that allowed you to pick up a ride from anywhere and sort of track the route as you’re going on really disrupted this market. Consumers love them. They had a thousand apps signups before they even launched. Kalanick mentioned this in terms of their launch strategy, we have to go here because the consumers really want us here. But immediately, they started getting pushback from the taxicab owners who were threatened by this new mode of transportation. They argued that they should be under the same regulations that the taxis were. And there were a lot of local government officials that were sort of mobilized against Uber as well. De Blasio, the Mayor of New York, wrote opinion articles against Uber, claiming that they were contributing to congestion. There was a lot of concern that maybe they had some safety issues, and the taxi drivers and the owners brought a lawsuit against Uber for evading these regulations. And then later on, and this was the case in many local governments, de Blasio introduced a bill to put additional restrictions on Uber that would make them look a lot more like a traditional taxi operating model, with limited number of licenses and strict requirements for reporting.
BRIAN KENNY: And this is the same scenario that’s going to play out almost with every city that they go into because there is such an established infrastructure for the taxi industry in those places. They have lobbyists. They’re tied into the political networks. In some instances, it was revealed that they’ve been connected with organized crime. So not for the faint of heart, right, trying to expand into some of the biggest cities in the United States.
ALEX MACKAY: Absolutely. Absolutely. And what’s sort of fascinating about the United States is it’s actually a place where a company can engage in this battle over regulation on the ground. And de Blasio writes his opinion article and pushes forward this bill. Uber responds by taking out an ad campaign, over $3 million, opposing these regulations and calling out de Blasio. So again, we sort of have this fascinating example of Uber mobilizing their own lobbyists, their lawyers, but also public advertising to sort of convince the residents of New York City that de Blasio and the regulators that are trying to come down on them are in the wrong.
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah. And at the end of the day, it’s consumers that they’re really making this appeal to, because I guess my question is, are these regulations stifling innovation? And if they are, who pays the ultimate price for that, Uber or the consumer?
ALEX MACKAY: Consumers definitely loved Uber. And I don’t think any of the regulators were trying to stifle innovation. I don’t think they would say that. I think their biggest concern, their primary concern was safety, and a secondary and related concern here was losing regulatory oversight over the transportation sector. So this is a public service that had been fairly tightly regulated for a long time, and there was some concern that what happens when this just becomes almost a free market sector. At the same time, these regulators have the lobbyists from the taxicab industry and other interested parties in their ear trying to convince them that Uber really is like a taxi company and should be regulated, and really emphasizing the safety concerns and other concerns to try to get stricter regulations put on Uber. And part of that may be valid. I think you certainly should be concerned about safety and there are real concerns there, but part of it is simply the strategic game that rivals are going to play between each other. And the taxicab industry sees Uber as a threat. It’s in their best interest to lobby the regulators to come down on Uber.
BRIAN KENNY: And what’s amazing to me is that while all this is playing out, they’re not turning their tails and running. They’re continuing to push forward and expand into other parts of the world. So can you talk a little bit about what it was like trying to go into countries in Latin America, countries in Asia, where the regulations and the regulatory infrastructure is quite different than it is in the US?
ALEX MACKAY: In the case, we have anecdotes, vignettes, one for each continent. And their experience in each continent was actually pretty different. Even within a continent, you’re going to have very different regulatory frameworks for each country. So we sort of pick a few and focus on a few, just to highlight how the experience is very different in different countries. And one thing that’s sort of interesting, in Latin America, we focus on Bogota in Colombia, and what’s sort of interesting there is they launched secretly and they were pretty early on considered to be illegal, but they continue to operate despite the official policy of being illegal in Colombia. And they were able to do that in a way that you may not be able to do it so easily in the United States, just because of the different layers of enforcement and policy considerations that are present in Colombia and not necessarily in the United States. Now, when I talk about the current state of Uber in different countries, this is continually evolving. So they temporarily suspended their operations early in 2020 in Columbia. Now they’re back. This is a continual back and forth game that they’re playing with the regulators in different markets.
BRIAN KENNY: And in a place like Colombia, are they not worried about violence and the potential for violence against their drivers?
ALEX MACKAY: Absolutely. So this is true sort of around the world. I think in certain countries, violence becomes a little bit more of a concern. And what they found in Colombia is they did have more incidents where taxi drivers decided to take things into their own hands and threaten Uber drivers and Uber riders, sometimes with weapons. Another decision Uber had to make that was related to that was whether or not to allow riders to pay in cash. Because in the United States, they’d exclusively used credit cards, but in Latin America and some other countries like India, consumers tended to prefer to use cash to pay, and allowing that sort of opened up this additional risk that Uber didn’t really have a great system in place to protect them from. Because when you go to cash, you’re not able to track every rider quite as easily, and there’s just a bigger chance for fraud or for robbery and that sort of thing popping up.
BRIAN KENNY: Going into Asia was also quite a challenge for them. Can you talk a little bit about some of the challenges they faced, particularly in China?
ALEX MACKAY: They had very different experiences in each country in Asia. China was a unique case that is very fascinating, because when Uber launched there, there were already existing technology-based, you might call them, rideshare companies, that were fairly prominent, Didi and Kuaidi, And these companies later merged to be one company, DiDi, which is huge. It’s on par with Uber in terms of its global presence as a ridesharing company. When Uber launched there, they didn’t fully anticipate all the changes they would have to make to going into a very different environment. In China, besides having established competitors, Google Maps didn’t work, and they sort of relied on that mapping software to do their location services. So they had to completely redo their location services. They also, again, relied on credit cards for payments, and in China, consumers increasingly used apps to do their payments. And this became a little bit of a challenge because the main app that Chinese customers used, they used WeChat and Alipay primarily, they were actually owned by parent companies of the rival ridesharing company. So Uber had to essentially negotiate with its rivals in order to have consumers pay for their ridesharing services. And so here are a few sort of localization issues that you could argue Uber didn’t fully anticipate when they launched. The other thing about competing in China that’s sort of interesting is that Chinese policy regarding competition is very different from policy in the United States and much of Europe. For the most part, there’s not the traditional antitrust view of protecting the consumers first and foremost. That certainly comes into play, but the Chinese government has other objectives, including promoting domestic firms. And so if you think about launching into a company where there’s a large established domestic rival that certainly increases the difficulty of success, because when push comes to shove, the government is likely to come down on the side of your rival, which is the domestic company, and not the foreign entrant.
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah, which is understandable, I guess, to some extent. This sounds exhausting, to be sort of fighting skirmishes on all these fronts in all these different places in the world. How does that affect the morale or tear at the fabric maybe of the culture at a company like Uber, where they’re trying to manage this on a global scale and running into challenges every step of the way?
ALEX MACKAY: It certainly has an effect. I think Uber did a very good job at recruiting teams of people who really wanted to win. And so, if that’s the consistent message you’re sending to your teams, then these challenges may be actually considered somewhat exciting. And so I think by bringing in that sort of person, I think they actually fueled this desire to win in these markets and really kept the momentum going. One of the downsides of this of course is that if you exclusively focus on winning and getting around the existing regulations, there does become this challenge of what’s ethical and what’s not ethical? And in certain business areas, there actually often is a little bit of a gray line. I mean, you can see this outside of ridesharing. It’s a much broader thing to think about, but regulation of pharmaceuticals, regulation of use of new technologies such as drones, often the technology outpaces the regulation by a little bit and there’s this lag in trying to figure out what actually is the right thing to do. I think it’s a fair question whether or not you can disentangle this sort of principle of confrontation that’s so pervasive throughout the company culture when it comes to regulation from this principle confrontation of other ethical issues that are not necessarily business driven, and whether or not it’s easy to maintain that separation. And I think that’s a fair question, certainly worthy for debate. But what I think is important is you can set up a company where you are abiding by ethical issues that are very clear, but you’re still going to face challenges on the legal side when you’re developing a new business in an area with new technology.
BRIAN KENNY: That’s a great insight. I mean, I found myself asking myself as I got through the case, I can’t tell if Uber is the victim or the aggressor in all of this. And I guess the answer is they’re a little bit of both.
ALEX MACKAY: Yeah. I think it’s fair to characterize them as an aggressor, and I think you sort of need to be if you want to succeed and if you want to change the world in a new technology area. In some sense, they’re a victim in that we’re all the victim as consumers and as firms of regulations that are sometimes difficult to adapt in real time to changing market conditions. And there’s a good reason why they are sticky over time, but sometimes that can be very costly. Going back to something we talked about earlier, I think there are hardly any consumers that wanted Uber kicked out of New York City. I think everyone realized this was just so much superior to any other option they had, that they were really willing to fight to keep Uber around in the limited ways they could.
BRIAN KENNY: So let’s go back to the central issue in the case then, which is, how important is it to them, in terms of their global strategy, to have a presence in a place like London? They’re still not profitable by the way, we should point that out, that despite the fact that they are the largest in the space, they haven’t turned the corner to profitability yet. I would imagine London’s kind of important.
ALEX MACKAY: Absolutely. London is a key international city, and a presence there is important for Uber’s overall brand. So many people travel through London, and it’s a real benefit for anyone who travels to be able to use the same service at any city you stop in. At the same time, they’re facing these increasing regulatory pressures from London, and so it’s a real question whether or not, 10 years from now, they look substantially different from the established taxi industry that’s there. And you can kind of see this battle playing out across different markets. As another example, in Ghana. When they entered there, they actually entered with a framework for understanding. They helped build the regulations for ridesharing services in Ghana when they entered. But over time, that evolved to additional restrictions as the existing taxi companies pushed back on them. So I think a key lesson here in all of this is that the regulations that you see at any given point in time aren’t absolutely fixed, for anyone starting a technology-based company, there will be regulations that do get created that affect your business. Stepping outside of transportation, we can see that going on now with the big tech firms and sort of the antitrust investigations they’re are under. And the policymakers in the US and Europe are really trying to evolve the set of regulations to reflect the different businesses that Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, Google are involved in.
BRIAN KENNY: One thing we haven’t touched on, and it’s not touched on in the case obviously because it just sort of started fairly recently, is the pandemic and the implications of the pandemic for the rideshare industry as fewer people find themselves in need of going anywhere. Have you given any thought to that and whether that’s going to have any effect on the regulations?
ALEX MACKAY: It certainly could. Uber is in a somewhat fortunate position, at least if you judge by their market capitalization, with respect to the pandemic. Initially their stocks took a pretty big hit, but rebounded pretty quickly, and part of this is because the primary part of their business is the transportation through Uber X, but they do also offer the delivery services through Uber Eats, and that business has really picked up during this pandemic. There’s certainly a mix of views about the future, but I think most people do believe that at some point we’ll get back to business as usual, at least for Uber services, when we come up with a vaccine. I think most people anticipate that they’ll be resuming use of Uber once it becomes safe to do so. And I think, to be frank, a lot of people already have resumed using Uber, especially people who don’t have cars or who see it as a valuable alternative or a safer alternative to public transit.
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah, that’s a really good point. And the Uber Eats thing is interesting as another example of how it’s important for businesses to re-imagine the business that they’re in because that, in many ways, may be helping them through a really tough patch here. This has been a really interesting conversation, Alex, I want to ask you one final question, which is, as the students are packing up to leave class, what’s the one thing you want them to take away from the case?
ALEX MACKAY: So I would hope the students take away the importance of regulation in business strategy. And I think the case of Uber really highlights that. And if you look at the conversation around Uber I’d say for the first 10 years of their existence, it was essentially around the superiority of their technology and not so much how they handled regulation. If you think back to the cease-and-desist letter that San Francisco issued in 2010, if Uber had simply stopped operations then, we wouldn’t have the ridesharing world that we have today. So their strategy of principle confrontation with respect to regulation was really essential for their future growth. Again, this does raise important ethical considerations as you’re operating in a legal gray area, but it’s certainly an essential part of strategy.
BRIAN KENNY: Alex, thanks so much for joining us on Cold Call today. It’s been great talking to you.
ALEX MACKAY: Thank you so much, Brian.
BRIAN KENNY: If you enjoy Cold Call, you might like other podcasts on the HBR Presents Network. Whether you’re looking for advice on navigating your career, you want the latest thinking in business and management, or you just want to hear what’s on the minds of Harvard Business School professors, the HBR Presents Network has a podcast for you. Find them on Apple podcasts or wherever you listen. I’m your host, Brian Kenny, and you’ve been listening to Cold Call , an official podcast of Harvard Business School on the HBR Presents Network.
- Subscribe On:
Latest in this series
This article is about competitive strategy.
- Global strategy
- Government policy and regulation
Partner Center
News release details
Uber announces results for first quarter 2024.
Trips grew 21% year-over-year; MAPCs and monthly trips per MAPC grew 15% and 6% year-over-year, respectively Gross Bookings grew 20% year-over-year and 21% year-over-year on a constant currency basis Income from operations of $172 million; Adjusted EBITDA of $1.4 billion, up 82% year-over-year Operating cash flow of $1.4 billion; Free cash flow of $1.4 billion
SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: UBER) today announced financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2024.
“Our results this quarter once again demonstrate our ability to deliver consistent, profitable growth at scale,” said Dara Khosrowshahi, CEO. “More than 7 million people now choose to earn flexibly on Uber every month, with driver earnings of $16.6 billion continuing to grow faster than our topline.”
“Our multi-year growth framework is on track, with audience up 15% and frequency up 6% in Q1,” said Prashanth Mahendra-Rajah, CFO. “We reached a new quarterly record for Adjusted EBITDA, which grew 82% YoY, and we generated free cash flow of $4.2 billion over the trailing twelve months.”
Financial Highlights for First Quarter 2024
- Gross Bookings grew 20% year-over-year (“YoY”) to $37.7 billion, or 21% on a constant currency basis, with Mobility Gross Bookings of $18.7 billion (+25% YoY or +26% YoY constant currency) and Delivery Gross Bookings of $17.7 billion (+18% YoY or +17% YoY constant currency). Trips during the quarter grew 21% YoY to 2.6 billion, or approximately 28 million trips per day on average.
- Revenue grew 15% YoY to $10.1 billion, or 15% on a constant currency basis. Combined Mobility and Delivery revenue grew 19% YoY to $8.8 billion, or 19% on a constant currency basis. Business model changes negatively impacted total revenue YoY growth by 8 percentage points.
- Income from operations was $172 million, up $434 million YoY and down $480 million quarter-over-quarter (“QoQ”).
- Net loss attributable to Uber Technologies, Inc. was $654 million, which includes a $721 million net headwind (pre-tax) due to net unrealized losses related to the revaluation of Uber’s equity investments.
- Adjusted EBITDA of $1.4 billion, up 82% YoY. Adjusted EBITDA margin as a percentage of Gross Bookings was 3.7%, up from 2.4% in Q1 2023.
- Net cash provided by operating activities was $1.4 billion and free cash flow, defined as net cash flows from operating activities less capital expenditures, was $1.4 billion.
- Unrestricted cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments were $5.8 billion at the end of the first quarter.
Outlook for Q2 2024
For Q2 2024, we anticipate:
- Our outlook assumes a roughly 3 percentage point currency headwind to total reported YoY growth, including a roughly 5 percentage point currency headwind to Mobility’s reported YoY growth.
- Adjusted EBITDA of $1.45 billion to $1.53 billion, which represents 58% to 67% YoY growth.
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Monthly Active Platform Consumers (“MAPCs”) |
|
| 130 |
|
|
| 149 |
|
| 15 | % |
|
| |
Trips |
|
| 2,124 |
|
|
| 2,572 |
|
| 21 | % |
|
| |
Gross Bookings |
| $ | 31,408 |
|
| $ | 37,651 |
|
| 20 | % |
| 21 | % |
Revenue |
| $ | 8,823 |
|
| $ | 10,131 |
|
| 15 | % |
| 15 | % |
Income (loss) from operations |
| $ | (262 | ) |
| $ | 172 |
|
| ** |
|
| ||
Net loss attributable to Uber Technologies, Inc. |
| $ | (157 | ) |
| $ | (654 | ) |
| ** |
|
| ||
Adjusted EBITDA |
| $ | 761 |
|
| $ | 1,382 |
|
| 82 | % |
|
| |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
| $ | 606 |
|
| $ | 1,416 |
|
| 134 | % |
|
| |
Free cash flow |
| $ | 549 |
|
| $ | 1,359 |
|
| 148 | % |
|
|
| See “Definitions of Non-GAAP Measures” and “Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Measures” sections herein for an explanation and reconciliations of non-GAAP measures used throughout this release. | |
| Q1 2023 net loss includes a $320 million net benefit (pre-tax) from revaluations of Uber’s equity investments. Q1 2024 net loss includes a $721 million net headwind (pre-tax) from revaluations of Uber’s equity investments. | |
** | Percentage not meaningful. |
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Gross Bookings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Mobility |
| $ | 14,981 |
| $ | 18,670 |
| 25 | % |
| 26 | % | ||
Delivery |
|
| 15,026 |
|
|
| 17,699 |
|
| 18 | % |
| 17 | % |
Freight |
|
| 1,401 |
|
|
| 1,282 |
|
| (8 | )% |
| (9 | )% |
|
| $ | 31,408 |
|
| $ | 37,651 |
|
| 20 | % |
| 21 | % |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Mobility |
| $ | 4,330 |
| $ | 5,633 |
| 30 | % |
| 29 | % | ||
Delivery |
|
| 3,093 |
|
|
| 3,214 |
|
| 4 | % |
| 4 | % |
Freight |
|
| 1,400 |
|
|
| 1,284 |
|
| (8 | )% |
| (8 | )% |
|
| $ | 8,823 |
|
| $ | 10,131 |
|
| 15 | % |
| 15 | % |
| Mobility Revenue in Q1 2024 was negatively impacted by business model changes in some countries that classified certain sales and marketing costs as contra revenue by $328 million. These changes negatively impacted Mobility revenue YoY growth by 8 percentage points. | |
| Delivery Revenue in Q1 2024 was negatively impacted by business model changes that classified certain sales and marketing costs as contra revenue by $414 million. These changes negatively impacted Delivery revenue YoY growth by 13 percentage points. | |
| Total revenue in Q1 2024 was negatively impacted by business model changes in some countries that classified certain sales and marketing costs as contra revenue by $742 million. These changes negatively impacted total revenue YoY growth by 8 percentage points. |
| ||||||
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Mobility |
| 28.9 | % |
| 30.2 | % |
Delivery |
| 20.6 | % |
| 18.2 | % |
| Mobility Revenue Margin in Q1 2024 was negatively impacted by business model changes in some countries that classified certain sales and marketing costs as contra revenue by 180 bps. | |
| Delivery Revenue Margin in Q1 2024 was negatively impacted by business model changes that classified certain sales and marketing costs as contra revenue by 230 bps. |
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Segment Adjusted EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Mobility |
| $ | 1,060 |
|
| $ | 1,479 |
|
| 40 | % |
Delivery |
|
| 288 |
|
|
| 528 |
|
| 83 | % |
Freight |
|
| (23 | ) |
|
| (21 | ) |
| 9 | % |
Corporate G&A and Platform R&D |
|
| (564 | ) |
|
| (604 | ) |
| (7 | )% |
|
| $ | 761 |
|
| $ | 1,382 |
|
| 82 | % |
| Includes costs that are not directly attributable to our reportable segments. Corporate G&A also includes certain shared costs such as finance, accounting, tax, human resources, information technology and legal costs. Platform R&D also includes mapping and payment technologies and support and development of the internal technology infrastructure. Our allocation methodology is periodically evaluated and may change. | |
| “Adjusted EBITDA” is a non-GAAP measure as defined by the SEC. See “Definitions of Non-GAAP Measures” and “Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Measures” sections herein for an explanation and reconciliations of non-GAAP measures used throughout this release. |
Financial Highlights for the First Quarter 2024 (continued)
- Gross Bookings of $18.7 billion: Mobility Gross Bookings grew 25% YoY and declined 3% QoQ.
- Revenue of $5.6 billion: Mobility Revenue grew 30% YoY and 2% QoQ. The YoY increase was primarily attributable to an increase in Mobility Gross Bookings due to an increase in Trip volumes. Mobility Revenue Margin of 30.2% increased 130 bps YoY and 150 bps QoQ. Business model changes negatively impacted Mobility Revenue Margin by 180 bps in Q1 2024.
- Adjusted EBITDA of $1.5 billion: Mobility Adjusted EBITDA increased 40% YoY, and Mobility Adjusted EBITDA margin was 7.9% of Gross Bookings compared to 7.1% in Q1 2023 and 7.5% in Q4 2023. Mobility Adjusted EBITDA margin improvement YoY was primarily driven by better cost leverage from higher volume.
- Gross Bookings of $17.7 billion: Delivery Gross Bookings grew 18% YoY and 4% QoQ.
- Revenue of $3.2 billion: Delivery Revenue grew 4% YoY and 3% QoQ. Delivery Revenue Margin of 18.2% decreased 240 bps YoY and 10 bps QoQ. Business model changes negatively impacted Delivery Revenue Margin by 230 bps in Q1 2024.
- Adjusted EBITDA of $528 million: Delivery Adjusted EBITDA increased 83% YoY, and Delivery Adjusted EBITDA margin was 3.0% of Gross Bookings, compared to 1.9% in Q1 2023 and 2.8% in Q4 2023. Delivery Adjusted EBITDA margin improvement YoY was primarily driven by better cost leverage from higher volumes and increased Advertising revenue.
- Revenue of $1.3 billion: Freight Revenue declined 8% YoY and was flat QoQ. The YoY decrease was driven by lower revenue per load as a result of the challenging freight market cycle.
- Adjusted EBITDA loss of $21 million: Freight Adjusted EBITDA increased $2 million YoY. Freight Adjusted EBITDA margin as a percentage of Gross Bookings remained flat YoY.
- Corporate G&A and Platform R&D: Corporate G&A and Platform R&D expenses of $604 million, compared to $564 million in Q1 2023, and $625 million in Q4 2023. Corporate G&A and Platform R&D as a percentage of Gross Bookings decreased 20 bps YoY and 10 bps QoQ due to improved fixed cost leverage.
GAAP and Non-GAAP Costs and Operating Expenses
- Cost of revenue excluding D&A: GAAP cost of revenue equaled Non-GAAP cost of revenue and was $6.2 billion, representing 16.4% of Gross Bookings, compared to 16.7% and 16.1% in Q1 2023 and Q4 2023, respectively. On a YoY basis, non-GAAP cost of revenue as a percentage of Gross Bookings decreased due to improved cost leverage with Gross Bookings growth outpacing cost of revenue growth.
- Operations and support: GAAP operations and support was $685 million. Non-GAAP operations and support was $616 million, representing 1.6% of Gross Bookings, compared to 1.9% and 1.7% in Q1 2023 and Q4 2023, respectively. On a YoY basis, non-GAAP operations and support as a percentage of Gross Bookings decreased due to a decrease in driver background check costs.
- Sales and marketing: GAAP sales and marketing was $917 million. Non-GAAP sales and marketing was $895 million, representing 2.4% of Gross Bookings, compared to 3.9% and 2.4% in Q1 2023 and Q4 2023, respectively. On a YoY basis, non-GAAP sales and marketing as a percentage of Gross Bookings decreased due to business model changes in some countries that classified certain sales and marketing costs as contra revenue. Additionally, Gross Bookings mix shifted towards Mobility, which carry lower associated sales and marketing costs.
- Research and development: GAAP research and development was $790 million. Non-GAAP research and development was $488 million, representing 1.3% of Gross Bookings, compared to 1.5% and 1.3% in Q1 2023 and Q4 2023, respectively. On a YoY basis, non-GAAP research and development as a percentage of Gross Bookings decreased due to improved fixed cost leverage.
- General and administrative: GAAP general and administrative was $1.2 billion. Non-GAAP general and administrative was $582 million, representing 1.5% of Gross Bookings, compared to 1.6% and 1.5% in Q1 2023 and Q4 2023, respectively. On a YoY basis, non-GAAP general and administrative as a percentage of Gross Bookings decreased due to a decrease in employee headcount costs.
Operating Highlights for the First Quarter 2024
- Monthly Active Platform Consumers (“MAPCs”) reached 149 million: MAPCs grew 15% YoY to 149 million, driven by continued improvement in consumer activity for both our Mobility and Delivery offerings.
- Trips of 2.6 billion: Trips on our platform grew 21% YoY, driven by both Mobility and Delivery growth. Monthly trips per MAPC grew 6% YoY to 5.8.
- Supporting earners: Drivers and couriers earned an aggregate $16.6 billion (including tips) during the quarter, with earnings up 22% YoY, or 24% on a constant currency basis.
- Membership: Returned to the Super Bowl stage for the fourth year to launch our latest campaign “Don’t forget to remember Uber Eats.” In addition, launched Game Day Deals for the second year, offering special savings for Uber One members during March Madness. Further, launched partnerships with brands including NOS in Portugal and Disney in the UK.
- Advertising: Expanded video Journey Ads to new markets including Australia, Brazil and Chile, with the ad format now available in 12 countries. In addition, expanded in-car tablets to more than 50 US cities including Austin, Denver, New York City suburbs, Salt Lake City and Seattle. Further, launched a custom creative hub for enterprise advertisers, allowing them to quickly launch ad campaigns with personalized creative.
- Autonomous updates: Building on the success of our autonomous mobility partnership, launched our autonomous delivery partnership in Phoenix with Waymo in April. In addition, expanded our partnership with Cartken and partnered with Mitsubishi Electric to include deliveries via automated robots in Japan, the first international market to have autonomous delivery available on Uber Eats.
- Family profiles with teen accounts: Completed the rollout of teen accounts to all 50 US states and to more cities in Brazil. Family profiles with teen accounts are now available in over 250 cities. In addition, launched additional safety features; announced spending limits on teen accounts, which allow parents to set a monthly budget for their teen’s rides and meals within their own app; and enabled more ride types for teen trips.
- Annual Environmental, Social, and Governance Report: Published our annual Environmental, Social, and Governance Report in April, which highlights our perspectives on the ESG issues that matter most to the people who earn on, move on, or invest in our platform, as well as our approach to People and Culture and our broader diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.
- Taxis: Brought the majority of Hong Kong taxi supply onto Uber by integrating HKTaxi onto the Uber app, and began scaling Los Angeles Yellow Cab trips. Launched Uber Taxi in several cities across markets including Colombia and Italy.
- Electric Vehicle (“EV”) updates: Expanded Comfort Electric to nearly 60 cities globally, with the latest launch in New York City. In addition, launched and expanded EV partnerships, including a multi-year strategic partnership with Revel to provide New York City drivers on Uber with exclusive charging discounts and access to up to 250 fast charging stations, and a new phase of our partnership with VEMO in Mexico.
- Emission Savings feature: In tandem with electrification product expansions to new markets, introduced the Emission Savings feature in the Uber app, allowing riders who take trips on Uber Green and Comfort Electric to track and learn more about their carbon emissions impact.
- Original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) agreements: Began working with Tesla to help accelerate the transition to electric vehicles by sharing data that illustrate where drivers need charging infrastructure the most and offering incentives to US drivers on Uber for the purchase of certain Tesla vehicles. In addition, signed a Memorandum of Understanding (“MoU”) with Kia to work together on an electric purpose built vehicle (“PBV”) designed specifically for ridesharing drivers.
- Uber Car Seat: Launched Uber Car Seat, a product that eliminates the need for parents and caregivers to bring their own car seat, making travel simple and stress free, in partnership with premier car seat maker, Nuna. Uber Car Seat is now available in Los Angeles and New York City.
- Grocery merchant selection: Expanded our grocery merchant selection in the US and Canada, as we launched grocers including Weis Markets, Fresh Thyme Market, Carlie C’s and Bashas’ as partners in the US; and Rabba Fine Foods in Canada.
- Grocery loyalty: Began enabling consumers to benefit from grocery loyalty programs while shopping on Uber Eats by offering in-app access to member prices and discounts at grocery merchants including Co-op in the UK and Dia in Spain. The Co-op launch marks a UK supermarket first for a food delivery app.
- Live Location Sharing: After successfully launching the feature on Uber rides, introduced the ability for consumers to share their live location with their courier, making the drop-off process faster and more seamless across nearly all markets globally.
- Uber Direct expansion: Added new Uber Direct partnerships including medication delivery for Healthera in the UK and four partner companies in Japan; and white-label delivery for electronics retailer MediaMarkt in Germany, retail solutions company Inovretail in Spain, and supermarket chain Co-op in the UK.
- Reusable packaging: Expanded our partnership with DeliverZero to the West Coast, inclusive of more than 130 restaurants with a current focus on the greater Los Angeles and San Francisco regions. The partnership increases access to sustainable packaging through DeliverZero’s network of returnable, reusable food containers.
- Powerloop expansion: Announced the national expansion of Powerloop, Uber Freight's drop-and-hook capacity solution, alongside new capabilities that further optimize freight networks including an expanded dedicated fleet offering, AI-powered bundling capabilities, and telematics-enhanced smart trailers, all aimed at providing greater value and flexibility to carriers and shippers alike.
- Ocean freight visibility solutions: Unveiled new Transportation Management System (“TMS”) features that provide accurate, real-time visibility for all shipments. These enhancements offer logistics teams comprehensive insights into 99% of ocean shipments, enabling proactive management of exceptions and potential disruptions for customers with global supply chains.
Webcast and conference call information
A live audio webcast of our first quarter ended March 31, 2024 earnings release call will be available at https://investor.uber.com/ , along with the earnings press release and slide presentation. The call begins on May 8, 2024 at 5:00 AM (PT) / 8:00 AM (ET). This press release, including the reconciliations of certain non-GAAP measures to their nearest comparable GAAP measures, is also available on that site.
We also provide announcements regarding our financial performance and other matters, including SEC filings, investor events, press and earnings releases, on our investor relations website ( https://investor.uber.com/ ), and our blogs ( https://uber.com/blog ) and Twitter accounts (@uber and @dkhos), as a means of disclosing material information and complying with our disclosure obligations under Regulation FD.
Uber’s mission is to create opportunity through movement. We started in 2010 to solve a simple problem: how do you get access to a ride at the touch of a button? More than 49 billion trips later, we're building products to get people closer to where they want to be. By changing how people, food, and things move through cities, Uber is a platform that opens up the world to new possibilities.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements regarding our future business expectations which involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from the results predicted, and reported results should not be considered as an indication of future performance. Forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical facts and can be identified by terms such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “hope,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “objective,” “ongoing,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “target,” “will,” or “would” or similar expressions and the negatives of those terms. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and other factors relate to, among others: competition, managing our growth and corporate culture, financial performance, investments in new products or offerings, our ability to attract drivers, consumers and other partners to our platform, our brand and reputation and other legal and regulatory developments, particularly with respect to our relationships with drivers and couriers and the impact of the global economy, including rising inflation and interest rates. For additional information on other potential risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from the results predicted, please see our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 and subsequent quarterly reports and other filings filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time. All information provided in this release and in the attachments is as of the date of this press release and any forward-looking statements contained herein are based on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable as of this date. Undue reliance should not be placed on the forward-looking statements in this press release, which are based on information available to us on the date hereof. We undertake no duty to update this information unless required by law.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
To supplement our financial information, which is prepared and presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”), we use the following non-GAAP financial measures: Adjusted EBITDA; Free cash flow; Non-GAAP Costs and Operating Expenses as well as, revenue growth rates in constant currency. The presentation of this financial information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. We use these non-GAAP financial measures for financial and operational decision-making and as a means to evaluate period-to-period comparisons. We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures provide meaningful supplemental information regarding our performance by excluding certain items that may not be indicative of our recurring core business operating results.
We believe that both management and investors benefit from referring to these non-GAAP financial measures in assessing our performance and when planning, forecasting, and analyzing future periods. These non-GAAP financial measures also facilitate management’s internal comparisons to our historical performance. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures are useful to investors both because (1) they allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management in its financial and operational decision-making and (2) they are used by our institutional investors and the analyst community to help them analyze the health of our business.
There are a number of limitations related to the use of non-GAAP financial measures. In light of these limitations, we provide specific information regarding the GAAP amounts excluded from these non-GAAP financial measures and evaluating these non-GAAP financial measures together with their relevant financial measures in accordance with GAAP.
For more information on these non-GAAP financial measures, please see the sections titled “Key Terms for Our Key Metrics and Non-GAAP Financial Measures,” “Definitions of Non-GAAP Measures” and “Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Measures” included at the end of this release. In regards to forward looking non-GAAP guidance, we are not able to reconcile the forward-looking non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA measure to the closest corresponding GAAP measure without unreasonable efforts because we are unable to predict the ultimate outcome of certain significant items. These items include, but are not limited to, significant legal settlements, unrealized gains and losses on equity investments, tax and regulatory reserve changes, restructuring costs and acquisition and financing related impacts.
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | 4,680 |
|
| $ | 5,019 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
| 727 |
|
|
| 744 |
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents |
|
| 805 |
|
|
| 808 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
| 3,404 |
|
|
| 3,708 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
| 1,681 |
|
|
| 1,795 |
|
Total current assets |
|
| 11,297 |
|
|
| 12,074 |
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents |
|
| 1,519 |
|
|
| 2,157 |
|
Restricted investments |
|
| 4,779 |
|
|
| 4,812 |
|
Investments |
|
| 6,101 |
|
|
| 5,587 |
|
Equity method investments |
|
| 353 |
|
|
| 354 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
| 2,073 |
|
|
| 2,033 |
|
Operating lease right-of-use assets |
|
| 1,241 |
|
|
| 1,216 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
| 1,425 |
|
|
| 1,335 |
|
Goodwill |
|
| 8,151 |
|
|
| 8,089 |
|
Other assets |
|
| 1,760 |
|
|
| 1,942 |
|
Total assets |
| $ | 38,699 |
|
| $ | 39,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Accounts payable |
| $ | 790 |
|
| $ | 833 |
|
Short-term insurance reserves |
|
| 2,016 |
|
|
| 2,082 |
|
Operating lease liabilities, current |
|
| 190 |
|
|
| 184 |
|
Accrued and other current liabilities |
|
| 6,458 |
|
|
| 6,894 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
| 9,454 |
|
|
| 9,993 |
|
Long-term insurance reserves |
|
| 4,722 |
|
|
| 5,346 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
|
| 9,459 |
|
|
| 9,457 |
|
Operating lease liabilities, non-current |
|
| 1,550 |
|
|
| 1,520 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
| 832 |
|
|
| 784 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
| 26,017 |
|
|
| 27,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Redeemable non-controlling interests |
|
| 654 |
|
|
| 651 |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
| ||||
Common stock |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
| 42,264 |
|
|
| 42,743 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
| (421 | ) |
|
| (437 | ) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
| (30,594 | ) |
|
| (31,248 | ) |
Total Uber Technologies, Inc. stockholders' equity |
|
| 11,249 |
|
|
| 11,058 |
|
Non-redeemable non-controlling interests |
|
| 779 |
|
|
| 790 |
|
Total equity |
|
| 12,028 |
|
|
| 11,848 |
|
Total liabilities, redeemable non-controlling interests and equity |
| $ | 38,699 |
|
| $ | 39,599 |
|
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 8,823 |
|
| $ | 10,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cost of revenue, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below |
|
| 5,259 |
|
|
| 6,168 |
|
Operations and support |
|
| 640 |
|
|
| 685 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
| 1,262 |
|
|
| 917 |
|
Research and development |
|
| 775 |
|
|
| 790 |
|
General and administrative |
|
| 942 |
|
|
| 1,209 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
| 207 |
|
|
| 190 |
|
|
|
| 9,085 |
|
|
| 9,959 |
|
|
|
| (262 | ) |
|
| 172 |
|
Interest expense |
|
| (168 | ) |
|
| (124 | ) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
| 292 |
|
|
| (678 | ) |
|
|
| (138 | ) |
|
| (630 | ) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
| 55 |
|
|
| 29 |
|
Income (loss) from equity method investments |
|
| 36 |
|
|
| (4 | ) |
|
|
| (157 | ) |
|
| (663 | ) |
Less: net loss attributable to non-controlling interests, net of tax |
|
| — |
|
|
| (9 | ) |
|
| $ | (157 | ) |
| $ | (654 | ) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic |
| $ | (0.08 | ) |
| $ | (0.31 | ) |
Diluted |
| $ | (0.08 | ) |
| $ | (0.32 | ) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic |
|
| 2,009,557 |
|
|
| 2,078,467 |
|
Diluted |
|
| 2,009,557 |
|
|
| 2,080,168 |
|
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net loss including non-controlling interests |
| $ | (157 | ) |
| $ | (663 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
| ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
| 207 |
|
|
| 194 |
|
Bad debt expense |
|
| 20 |
|
|
| 26 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
| 470 |
|
|
| 484 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
| 10 |
|
|
| (16 | ) |
Loss (income) from equity method investments, net |
|
| (36 | ) |
|
| 4 |
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on debt and equity securities, net |
|
| (320 | ) |
|
| 721 |
|
Impairments of goodwill, long-lived assets and other assets |
|
| 67 |
|
|
| — |
|
Unrealized foreign currency transactions |
|
| 83 |
|
|
| 150 |
|
Other |
|
| 4 |
|
|
| (59 | ) |
Change in assets and liabilities, net of impact of business acquisitions and disposals: |
|
|
|
| ||||
Accounts receivable |
|
| 168 |
|
|
| (422 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
| (119 | ) |
|
| (322 | ) |
Operating lease right-of-use assets |
|
| 52 |
|
|
| 46 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
| (7 | ) |
|
| 46 |
|
Accrued insurance reserves |
|
| 350 |
|
|
| 693 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
| (142 | ) |
|
| 590 |
|
Operating lease liabilities |
|
| (44 | ) |
|
| (56 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
| 606 |
|
|
| 1,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
| (57 | ) |
|
| (57 | ) |
Purchases of non-marketable equity securities |
|
| — |
|
|
| (174 | ) |
Purchases of marketable securities |
|
| (846 | ) |
|
| (2,029 | ) |
Proceeds from maturities and sales of marketable securities |
|
| 500 |
|
|
| 2,030 |
|
Proceeds from sale of equity method investment |
|
| — |
|
|
| 9 |
|
Other investing activities |
|
| 4 |
|
|
| (21 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
| (399 | ) |
|
| (242 | ) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Issuance of term loans and notes, net of issuance costs |
|
| 1,121 |
|
|
| — |
|
Principal repayment on term loan and notes |
|
| (1,137 | ) |
|
| (6 | ) |
Principal payments on finance leases |
|
| (40 | ) |
|
| (42 | ) |
Other financing activities |
|
| (51 | ) |
|
| (52 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
| (107 | ) |
|
| (100 | ) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash and cash equivalents |
|
| 16 |
|
|
| (94 | ) |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash and cash equivalents |
|
| 116 |
|
|
| 980 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Beginning of period |
|
| 6,677 |
|
|
| 7,004 |
|
End of period |
| $ | 6,793 |
|
| $ | 7,984 |
|
Other Income (Expense), Net
The following table presents other income (expense), net (in millions):
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
| ||||||
Interest income |
| $ | 87 |
|
| $ | 159 |
|
Foreign currency exchange losses, net |
|
| (94 | ) |
|
| (164 | ) |
Unrealized gain (loss) on debt and equity securities, net |
|
| 320 |
|
|
| (721 | ) |
Other, net |
|
| (21 | ) |
|
| 48 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
| $ | 292 |
|
| $ | (678 | ) |
| During the three months ended March 31, 2023, unrealized gain on debt and equity securities, net primarily represents changes in the fair value of our equity securities, primarily including: a $357 million unrealized gain on our Didi investment and a $54 million unrealized gain on our Aurora investment, partially offset by a $113 million unrealized loss on our Grab investment. | |
| During the three months ended March 31, 2024, unrealized loss on debt and equity securities, net primarily represents changes in the fair value of our equity securities, primarily including: a $505 million unrealized loss on our Aurora investment, a $123 million unrealized loss on our Grab investment, and a $69 million unrealized loss on our Didi investment. |
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
The following table summarizes total stock-based compensation expense by function (in millions):
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
| ||||||
Operations and support |
| $ | 38 |
| $ | 67 | ||
Sales and marketing |
|
| 24 |
|
|
| 21 |
|
Research and development |
|
| 290 |
|
|
| 299 |
|
General and administrative |
|
| 118 |
|
|
| 97 |
|
Total |
| $ | 470 |
|
| $ | 484 |
|
Key Terms for Our Key Metrics and Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is a Non-GAAP measure. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss), excluding (i) income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, (ii) net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests, net of tax, (iii) provision for (benefit from) income taxes, (iv) income (loss) from equity method investments, (v) interest expense, (vi) other income (expense), net, (vii) depreciation and amortization, (viii) stock-based compensation expense, (ix) certain legal, tax, and regulatory reserve changes and settlements, (x) goodwill and asset impairments/loss on sale of assets, (xi) acquisition, financing and divestitures related expenses, (xii) restructuring and related charges and (xiii) other items not indicative of our ongoing operating performance.
Adjusted EBITDA margin . We define Adjusted EBITDA margin as Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of Gross Bookings. We define incremental margin as the change in Adjusted EBITDA between periods divided by the change in Gross Bookings between periods.
Aggregate Driver and Courier Earnings . Aggregate Driver and Courier Earnings refers to fares (net of Uber service fee, taxes and tolls), tips, Driver incentives and Driver benefits.
Driver(s). The term Driver collectively refers to independent providers of ride or delivery services who use our platform to provide Mobility or Delivery services, or both.
Driver or restaurant earnings. Driver or restaurant earnings refer to the net portion of the fare or the net portion of the order value that a Driver or a restaurant retains, respectively. These are generally included in aggregate Drivers and Couriers earnings.
Driver incentives. Driver incentives refer to payments that we make to Drivers, which are separate from and in addition to the Driver’s portion of the fare paid by the consumer after we retain our service fee to Drivers. For example, Driver incentives could include payments we make to Drivers should they choose to take advantage of an incentive offer and complete a consecutive number of trips or a cumulative number of trips on the platform over a defined period of time. Driver incentives are recorded as a reduction of revenue or cost of revenue, exclusive of depreciation and amortization. These incentives are generally included in aggregate Drivers and Couriers earnings.
Free cash flow. Free cash flow is a Non-GAAP measure. We define free cash flow as net cash flows from operating activities less capital expenditures.
Gross Bookings. We define Gross Bookings as the total dollar value, including any applicable taxes, tolls, and fees, of: Mobility rides; Delivery orders (in each case without any adjustment for consumer discounts and refunds); Driver and Merchant earnings; Driver incentives and Freight Revenue. Gross Bookings do not include tips earned by Drivers. Gross Bookings are an indication of the scale of our current platform, which ultimately impacts revenue.
Monthly Active Platform Consumers (“MAPCs”). We define MAPCs as the number of unique consumers who completed a Mobility ride or received a Delivery order on our platform at least once in a given month, averaged over each month in the quarter. While a unique consumer can use multiple product offerings on our platform in a given month, that unique consumer is counted as only one MAPC.
Revenue Margin. We define Revenue Margin as revenue as a percentage of Gross Bookings.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA. We define each segment’s Adjusted EBITDA as segment revenue less the following direct costs and expenses of that segment: (i) cost of revenue, exclusive of depreciation and amortization; (ii) operations and support; (iii) sales and marketing; (iv) research and development; and (v) general and administrative. Segment Adjusted EBITDA also reflects any applicable exclusions from Adjusted EBITDA.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA margin . We define each segment’s Adjusted EBITDA margin as the segment Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of segment Gross Bookings.
Trips. We define Trips as the number of completed consumer Mobility rides and Delivery orders in a given period. For example, an UberX Share ride with three paying consumers represents three unique Trips, whereas an UberX ride with three passengers represents one Trip. We believe that Trips are a useful metric to measure the scale and usage of our platform.
Definitions of Non-GAAP Measures
We collect and analyze operating and financial data to evaluate the health of our business and assess our performance. In addition to revenue, net income (loss), income (loss) from operations, and other results under GAAP, we use: Adjusted EBITDA; Free cash flow; Non-GAAP Costs and Operating Expenses; as well as, revenue growth rates in constant currency, which are described below, to evaluate our business. We have included these non-GAAP financial measures because they are key measures used by our management to evaluate our operating performance. Accordingly, we believe that these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results in the same manner as our management team and board of directors. Our calculation of these non-GAAP financial measures may differ from similarly-titled non-GAAP measures, if any, reported by our peer companies. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation from, or as substitutes for, financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Adjusted EBITDA
We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss), excluding (i) income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, (ii) net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests, net of tax, (iii) provision for (benefit from) income taxes, (iv) income (loss) from equity method investments, (v) interest expense, (vi) other income (expense), net, (vii) depreciation and amortization, (viii) stock-based compensation expense, (ix) certain legal, tax, and regulatory reserve changes and settlements, (x) goodwill and asset impairments/loss on sale of assets, (xi) acquisition, financing and divestitures related expenses, (xii) restructuring and related charges and (xiii) other items not indicative of our ongoing operating performance.
We have included Adjusted EBITDA because it is a key measure used by our management team to evaluate our operating performance, generate future operating plans, and make strategic decisions, including those relating to operating expenses. Accordingly, we believe that Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results in the same manner as our management team and board of directors. In addition, it provides a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons of our business, as it removes the effect of certain non-cash expenses and certain variable charges.
Legal, tax, and regulatory reserve changes and settlements
Legal, tax, and regulatory reserve changes and settlements are primarily related to certain significant legal proceedings or governmental investigations related to worker classification definitions, or tax agencies challenging our non-income tax positions. These matters have limited precedent, cover extended historical periods and are unpredictable in both magnitude and timing, therefore are distinct from normal, recurring legal, tax and regulatory matters and related expenses incurred in our ongoing operating performance.
Limitations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation
Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as a financial measure, should be considered as supplemental in nature, and is not meant as a substitute for the related financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. These limitations include the following:
- Adjusted EBITDA excludes certain recurring, non-cash charges, such as depreciation of property and equipment and amortization of intangible assets, and although these are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect all cash capital expenditure requirements for such replacements or for new capital expenditure requirements;
- Adjusted EBITDA excludes stock-based compensation expense, which has been, and will continue to be for the foreseeable future, a significant recurring expense in our business and an important part of our compensation strategy;
- Adjusted EBITDA excludes certain restructuring and related charges, part of which may be settled in cash;
- Adjusted EBITDA excludes other items not indicative of our ongoing operating performance;
- Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect period to period changes in taxes, income tax expense or the cash necessary to pay income taxes;
- Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the components of other income (expense), net, which primarily includes: interest income; foreign currency exchange gains (losses), net; and unrealized gain (loss) on debt and equity securities, net; and
- Adjusted EBITDA excludes certain legal, tax, and regulatory reserve changes and settlements that may reduce cash available to us.
Constant Currency
We compare the percent change in our current period results from the corresponding prior period using constant currency disclosure. We present constant currency growth rate information to provide a framework for assessing how our underlying revenue performed excluding the effect of foreign currency rate fluctuations. We calculate constant currency by translating our current period financial results using the corresponding prior period’s monthly exchange rates for our transacted currencies other than the U.S. dollar.
Free Cash Flow
We define free cash flow as net cash flows from operating activities less capital expenditures.
Non-GAAP Costs and Operating Expenses
Costs and operating expenses are defined as: cost of revenue, exclusive of depreciation and amortization; operations and support; sales and marketing; research and development; and general and administrative expenses. We define Non-GAAP costs and operating expenses as costs and operating expenses excluding: (i) stock-based compensation expense, (ii) certain legal, tax, and regulatory reserve changes and settlements, (iii) goodwill and asset impairments/loss on sale of assets, (iv) acquisition, financing and divestiture related expenses, (v) restructuring and related charges and (vi) other items not indicative of our ongoing operating performance.
Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Measures
The following table presents reconciliations of Adjusted EBITDA to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure for each of the periods indicated:
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add (deduct): |
|
|
|
| ||||
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests, net of tax |
|
| — |
|
|
| (9 | ) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
| 55 |
|
|
| 29 |
|
(Income) loss from equity method investments |
|
| (36 | ) |
|
| 4 |
|
Interest expense |
|
| 168 |
|
|
| 124 |
|
Other (income) expense, net |
|
| (292 | ) |
|
| 678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add (deduct): |
|
|
|
| ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
| 207 |
|
|
| 190 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
| 470 |
|
|
| 484 |
|
Legal, tax, and regulatory reserve changes and settlements |
|
| 250 |
|
|
| 527 |
|
Goodwill and asset impairments/loss on sale of assets |
|
| 67 |
|
|
| (3 | ) |
Acquisition, financing and divestitures related expenses |
|
| 8 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
Gain on lease arrangement, net |
|
| (1 | ) |
|
| — |
|
Restructuring and related charges, net |
|
| 22 |
|
|
| 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents reconciliations of free cash flow to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure for each of the periods indicated:
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
| (57 | ) |
|
| (57 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables present reconciliations of Non-GAAP costs and operating expenses to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure for each of the periods indicated:
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Restructuring and related charges |
|
| — |
|
|
| (9 | ) |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and related charges |
|
| (8 | ) |
|
| (3 | ) |
|
| (2 | ) |
Acquisition, financing and divestitures related expenses |
|
| (3 | ) |
|
| (1 | ) |
|
| — |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
| (38 | ) |
|
| (52 | ) |
|
| (67 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and related charges |
|
| (1 | ) |
|
| (1 | ) |
|
| (1 | ) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
| (24 | ) |
|
| (22 | ) |
|
| (21 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and related charges |
|
| (11 | ) |
|
| (3 | ) |
|
| (3 | ) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
| (290 | ) |
|
| (298 | ) |
|
| (299 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal, tax, and regulatory reserve changes and settlements |
|
| (250 | ) |
|
| 73 |
|
|
| (527 | ) |
Goodwill and asset impairments/loss on sale of assets |
|
| (67 | ) |
|
| 1 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
Restructuring and related charges |
|
| (2 | ) |
|
| — |
|
|
| (1 | ) |
Acquisition, financing and divestitures related expenses |
|
| (5 | ) |
|
| (8 | ) |
|
| (5 | ) |
Gain (loss) on lease arrangements, net |
|
| 1 |
|
|
| (8 | ) |
|
| — |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
| (118 | ) |
|
| (97 | ) |
|
| (97 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investors and analysts: [email protected] Media: [email protected]
Sign up for email alerts
To opt in to receive investor email alerts, please enter your email address in the field below and select at least one alert option. After submitting your request, you’ll receive an activation email at the requested email address. You must click the activation link in order to complete your subscription. You can sign up for additional alert options at any time.
You can unsubscribe to any of the investor alerts you are subscribed to by visiting the Unsubscribe section below. If you experience any issues with this process, please contact us for further assistance.
By providing your email address below, you are giving consent to Uber Technologies Inc. to send you the requested investor email alert updates.
* |
IMAGES
COMMENTS
And, investors at Uber's first pitch deck presentation liked it well enough to offer the company an initial round of seed funding, totaling $200K. The original pitch deck that helped Uber raise $200K (in 2008). Copy their strategies and craft a top pitch deck!
We redesigned the original Uber pitch deck using Beautiful.ai's PowerPoint alternative presentation software. Our revised pitch deck template incorporates professionally-recommended practices of good design, including a variety of customizable themes and presentation templates for practically any purpose.
Uber is a technology company that connects riders and partner drivers using a smartphone application (Uber Partner App, Uber App, the App). By using technology and focusing on safety and customer service, we aim to increase urban mobility, create economic opportunities and support Malaysian cities.
Uber, a global transportation network company (TNC), emerged as a disruptive force in the transportation industry, reshaping the way people…
In 2008, Uber started with $1.25 million in seed funding from investors, but they relied heavily on a presentation to do so. While successful, the original Uber pitch deck was a snooze, so we updated it using Beautiful.ai.
Explore our enhanced Uber pitch deck template, based on the original that raised $200K. Gain insights and tips for creating your successful pitch deck.
Want to learn more about Uber? Read about our leadership, customers, the Uber platform, the communities we serve, and more!
The following Uber pitch deck template follows the traditional order of slides recommended by accelerators and successful startups. But first things first: what must a pitch deck contain?
Uber Pitch Deck (+Free PPT & PDF Download) Get the Uber pitch deck template with a free open-sourced design. As the most successful startup in the gig economy, Uber has revolutionized the transportation and delivery industry. While the original Uber deck from 2008 might look a bit dated, we modernized for you to use for free so you can focus on revolutionizing your own industry!
Pitch Deck Teardown: Uber's $200K pre-seed deck from 2008. There's a pretty decent chance you've heard of a little company called Uber. It was a Crunchies finalist back in 2011 (for Best ...
Uber Technologies, Inc. - Investor Relations | Uber. At Uber, we believe that sustainability is integral to the success of our business. Our environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting outlines the many ways in which Uber builds value and, through its core business and social impact activities, helps to make the world a better place.
Harvard Business School assistant professor Alexander MacKay describes Uber's global market strategy and responses by regulators and local competitors in his case, " Uber: Competing Globally ...
Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: UBER) today announced financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2024. "Our results this quarter once again demonstrate our ability to deliver consistent, profitable growth at scale," said Dara Khosrowshahi, CEO. "More than 7 million people now choose to earn flexibly on Uber every month, with driver ...
In the face of several challenges, Uber is working to foster a purposeful culture that's good for employees, the business and the communities it works in.
Uber - Powerpoint Presentation 2.5k 61.8k 46 Published: June 26th 2021 Tools Microsoft PowerPoint Google Slides Apple Keynote Creative Fields Graphic Design Storyboarding Infographic pitch deck Powerpoint presentation
Uber Technologies, Inc. develops and operates proprietary technology applications in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia excluding China and Southeast Asia. It operates through three segments: Mobility, Delivery, and Freight.
Uber's business strategy represents an intriguing and - as yet - fully unrealised payoff, as our in-depth analysis of their strategy and operating model shows…
Uber's business model has turned out to be so successful and popular that it has fuelled a new startup economy, the "on-demand economy". Having a deeper understanding of Uber's on-demand business model can play a pivotal role in modeling your own on-demand startup business idea. As a leading on-demand startup technology development ...
What is Uber? by Ben Leinster on Prezi. Blog. April 18, 2024. Use Prezi Video for Zoom for more engaging meetings. April 16, 2024. Understanding 30-60-90 sales plans and incorporating them into a presentation. April 13, 2024.
Uber Presentation Template & Uber Pitch Deck A pitch deck is a presentation that startup companies give to potential investors to secure funding. The pitch deck typically contains slides with information about the company's business model, product, team, market opportunity, and financials.
Uber says its drivers make $6 per hour more than traditional cab drivers. The ride-sharing app is gaining converts among its drivers: 71% say their income is better since signing up. 162,037 that has completed more than 4 trips since Dec 2014. 14% are female drivers. $19.04 average hourly wage.
Uber has projected that its ads business will generate more than $1 billion in revenue by 2024. Uber Ads boss Mark Grether outlined the unit's growth plans at the company's recent Investor Day ...
Uber's food and grocery delivery services have grown rapidly and become a core part of the company. Advertisement. Like its ridesharing business, delivery saw healthy growth in the second quarter, ...
Uber Organization and Financial Success • Revenue growth rate: This measures how fast Uber's revenue is increasing compared to its competitors or previous periods. According to 1, Uber's revenue growth rate was 300% in 2014, but it trailed behind Google and Facebook at similar stages of their development. • Profit margin: This measures how much of Uber's revenue is left after deducting all ...
Bags are not allowed with the exception of small purses (4.5" x 5"); empty poster tubes, sleeves and slings; and bags that are medically necessary. All of the above are subject to inspection. Concertgoers should expect heavy traffic and allow extra time to navigate city and campus streets.
Uber Technologies'UBER 2.60% increase; green up pointing triangle shares rose Tuesday after the company said it had returned to profitability on the back of solid growth in its ride-share and ...
Uber Technologies is a technology provider that matches riders with drivers, hungry people with restaurants and food delivery service providers, and shippers with carriers. The firm's on-demand ...
Uber reported strong second-quarter results, with gross bookings and net profit both up decently. But the company has chosen to highlight the success of its autonomous vehicle effort, likely to ...
Customers who order from select Shake Shack restaurants in Los Angeles through Uber Eats may receive their order via Serve's innovative autonomous robots. The partnership marks another step forward in the expansion of sidewalk robots on Uber Eats, which has been offering Serve's autonomous deliveries in Los Angeles since 2022, and is poised to lead to future expansion across the U.S.
Transportation company Uber have detailed their work in adding a new tiered storage feature to Apache Kafka, the popular distributed event streaming platform. This feature, added in 3.6.0 and ...