deed of assignment case law

Deed of Assignment (for Intellectual Property)

In the realm of intellectual property, a Deed of Assignment is a formal legal document used to transfer all rights, title, and interest in intellectual property from the assignor (original owner) to the assignee (new owner). This is crucial for the correct transfer of patents, copyrights, trademarks, and other IP rights. The deed typically requires specific legal formalities, sometimes notarization, to ensure it is legally enforceable.

To be legally effective a deed of assignment must contain:

• Title of the Document : It should clearly be labeled as a "Deed of Assignment" to identify the nature of the document.
• Date : The date on which the deed is executed should be clearly mentioned.
• Parties Involved : Full names and addresses of both the assignor (the party transferring the rights) and the assignee (the party receiving the rights). This identifies the parties to the agreement.
• Recitals : This section provides the background of the transaction. It typically includes details about the ownership of the assignor and the intention behind the assignment.
• Definition and Interpretation : Any terms used within the deed that have specific meanings should be clearly defined in this section.
• Description of the Property or Rights : A detailed description of the property or rights being assigned. For intellectual property, this would include details like patent numbers, trademark registrations , or descriptions of the copyrighted material.
• Terms of Assignment : This should include the extent of the rights being transferred, any conditions or limitations on the assignment, and any obligations the assignor or assignee must fulfill as part of the agreement.
• Warranties and Representations : The assignor typically makes certain warranties regarding their ownership of the property and the absence of encumbrances or third-party claims against it.
• Governing Law : The deed should specify which jurisdiction's laws govern the interpretation and enforcement of the agreement.
• Execution and Witnesses : The deed must be signed by both parties, and depending on jurisdictional requirements, it may also need to be witnessed and possibly notarized.
• Schedules or Annexures : If there are detailed lists or descriptions (like a list of patent numbers or property descriptions), these are often attached as schedules to the main body of the deed.

Letter of Assignment (for Trademarks and Patents)

This is a less formal document compared to the Deed of Assignment and is often used to record the assignment of rights or licensing of intellectual property on a temporary or limited basis. While it can outline the terms of the assignment, it may not be sufficient for the full transfer of legal title of IP rights. It's more commonly used in situations like assigning the rights to use a copyrighted work or a trademark license.

For example, company X allows company Y to use their trademark for specific products in a specific country for a specific period.  

At the same time, company X can use a Letter of Assignment to transfer a trademark to someone. In this case, it will be similar to the Deed of Assignment. 

Intellectual Property Sales Agreement

An IP Sales Agreement is a detailed contract that stipulates the terms and conditions of the sale of intellectual property. It covers aspects such as the specific rights being sold, payment terms, warranties regarding the ownership and validity of the IP, and any limitations or conditions on the use of the IP. This document is essential in transactions involving the sale of IP assets.

However, clients usually prefer to keep this document confidential and prepare special deeds of assignment or letter of assignment for different countries.

IP Transfer Declaration

In the context of intellectual property, a Declaration is often used to assert ownership or the originality of an IP asset. For example, inventors may use declarations in patent applications to declare their invention is original, or authors may use it to assert copyright ownership. It's a formal statement, sometimes required by IP offices or courts.

When assigning a trademark, the Declaration can be a valid document to function as a proof of the transfer. For example, a director of company X declares that the company had sold its Intellectual Property to company Y. 

Merger Document

When companies or entities with significant IP assets merge, an IP Merger Document is used. This document outlines how the intellectual property owned by the merging entities will be combined or managed. It includes details about the transfer, integration, or handling of patents, copyrights, trademarks, and any other intellectual property affected by the merger.

In all these cases, the precise drafting of documents is critical to ensure that IP rights are adequately protected and transferred. Legal advice is often necessary to navigate the complexities of intellectual property laws.

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy .

• Case studies
• Testimonials
• Litigation & Dispute Resolution
• Commercial Law
• Employment Law
• Professional Negligence
• Data Breach & Cyber
• Private Client
• Business owners
• High-net worth individuals
• Group actions & professional negligence

Deed of Assignment and the Notice of Assignment -What is the Difference?

In this article, Richard Gray barrister takes a brief look at the differences between a Deed of Assignment and a Notice of Assignment and the effect of the assignment on the contracting party

At the end of 2020, Elysium Law were instructed to act for a significant number of clients in relation to claims made by a company known as Felicitas Solutions Ltd (an Isle of Man Company) for recovery of loans which had been assigned out of various trust companies following loan planning entered into by various employees/contractors.

Following our detailed response, as to which please see the article on our website written by my colleague Ruby Keeler-Williams , the threatened litigation by way of debt claims seem to disappear. It is important to note that the original loans had been assigned by various Trustees to Felicitas, by reason of which, Felicitas stood in the shoes of the original creditor, which allowed the threatened action to be pursued.

After a period of inertia, Our Clients, as well as others, have been served with demand letters by a new assignee known as West 28 th Street Ltd . Accompanying the demand letters is a Notice of Assignment, by reason of which the Assignee has informed the alleged debtor of the Assignees right to enforce the debt.

Following two conferences we held last week and a number of phone call enquiries which we have received, we have been asked to comment upon the purport and effect of the Notice of Assignment, which the alleged debtors have received. Questions such as what does this mean (relating to the content) but more importantly is the ‘Notice’ valid?

Here I want to look briefly at the differences between the two documents.

There is no need for payment to make the assignment valid and therefore it is normally created by Deed.

 The creation of a legal assignment is governed by Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925:

136 Legal assignments of things in action.

(1)Any absolute assignment by writing under the hand of the assignor (not purporting to be by way of charge only) of any debt or other legal thing in action, of which express notice in writing has been given to the debtor, trustee or other person from whom the assignor would have been entitled to claim such debt or thing in action, is effectual in law (subject to equities having priority over the right of the assignee) to pass and transfer from the date of such notice—

(a) the legal right to such debt or thing in action;

(b) all legal and other remedies for the same; and

(c) the power to give a good discharge for the same without the concurrence of the assignor:

Some of the basic requirements for a legal assignment are;

• The assignment must not be subject to conditions.
• The rights to be assigned must not relate to only part of a debt, or other legal chose in action.
• The assignment must be in writing and signed by the assignor.
• The other party or parties to the agreement must be given notice of the assignment.

Notice of assignment

To create a legal assignment, section 136 requires that express notice in writing of the assignment must be given to the other contracting party (the debtor).

Notice must be in writing

Section 136 of the LPA 1925 requires “express notice in writing” to be given to the other original contracting party (or parties).

 Must the notice take any particular form?

The short answer is no. Other than the requirement that it is in writing, there is no prescribed form for the notice of assignment or its contents. However, common sense suggests that the notice must clearly identify the agreement concerned.

Can we  challenge the Notice?

No. You can challenge the validity of the assignment assignment by ‘attacking the Deed, which must conform with Section 136. In this specific case, the Notice sent by West 28 th Street in itself is valid. Clearly, any claims made must be effected by a compliant Deed and it is that which will require detailed consideration before any right to claim under the alleged debt is considered.

Can I demand sight of the assignment agreement

On receiving a notice of assignment, you may seek to satisfy yourself that the assignment has in fact taken place. The Court of Appeal has confirmed that this is a valid concern, but that does not give an automatic right to require sight of the assignment agreement.

In Van Lynn Developments Limited v Pelias Construction Co [1969]1QB 607  Lord  Denning said:

“After receiving the notice, the debtor will be entitled, of course, to require a sight of the assignment so as to be satisfied that it is valid…”

The Court of Appeal subsequently confirmed this  stating the contracting party is entitled to satisfy itself that a valid absolute assignment has taken place, so that it can be confident the assignee can give it a good discharge of its obligations

The important document is the Deed of Assignment, which sets out the rights assigned by the Assignor. The Notice of Assignment is simply a communication that there has been an assignment. The deed is governed by Section 136 of the LP 1925. It should be possible to obtain a copy of the Deed prior to any action taken in respect of it.

For more information on the claims by West 28 th Street or if advice is needed on the drafting of a Deed, then please call us on 0151-328-1968 or visit www.elysium-law.com .

Related news

Get in touch

Deed of Assignment: Everything You Need to Know

A deed of assignment refers to a legal document that records the transfer of ownership of a real estate property from one party to another. 3 min read updated on January 01, 2024

Updated October 8,2020:

A deed of assignment refers to a legal document that records the transfer of ownership of a real estate property from one party to another. It states that a specific piece of property will belong to the assignee and no longer belong to the assignor starting from a specified date. In order to be valid, a deed of assignment must contain certain types of information and meet a number of requirements.

What Is an Assignment?

An assignment is similar to an outright transfer, but it is slightly different. It takes place when one of two parties who have entered into a contract decides to transfer all of his or her rights and obligations to a third party and completely remove himself or herself from the contract.

Also called the assignee, the third party effectively replaces the former contracting party and consequently assumes all of his or her rights and obligations. Unless it is stated in the original contract, both parties to the initial contract are typically required to express approval of an assignment before it can occur. When you sell a piece of property, you are making an assignment of it to the buyer through the paperwork you sign at closing.

What Is a Deed of Assignment?

A deed of assignment refers to a legal document that facilitates the legal transfer of ownership of real estate property. It is an important document that must be securely stored at all times, especially in the case of real estate.

In general, this document can be described as a document that is drafted and signed to promise or guarantee the transfer of ownership of a real estate property on a specified date. In other words, it serves as the evidence of the transfer of ownership of the property, with the stipulation that there is a certain timeframe in which actual ownership will begin.

The deed of assignment is the main document between the seller and buyer that proves ownership in favor of the seller. The party who is transferring his or her rights to the property is known as the “assignor,” while the party who is receiving the rights is called the “assignee.”

A deed of assignment is required in many different situations, the most common of which is the transfer of ownership of a property. For example, a developer of a new house has to sign a deed of assignment with a buyer, stating that the house will belong to him or her on a certain date. Nevertheless, the buyer may want to sell the house to someone else in the future, which will also require the signing of a deed of assignment.

This document is necessary because it serves as a temporary title deed in the event that the actual title deed for the house has not been issued. For every piece of property that will be sold before the issuance of a title deed, a deed of assignment will be required.

Requirements for a Deed of Assignment

In order to be legally enforceable, an absolute sale deed must provide a clear description of the property being transferred, such as its address or other information that distinguishes it from other properties. In addition, it must clearly identify the buyer and seller and state the date when the transfer will become legally effective, the purchase price, and other relevant information.

In today's real estate transactions, contracting parties usually use an ancillary real estate sale contract in an attempt to cram all the required information into a deed. Nonetheless, the information found in the contract must be referenced by the deed.

Information to Include in a Deed of Assignment

• Names of parties to the agreement
• Addresses of the parties and how they are binding on the parties' successors, friends, and other people who represent them in any capacity
• History of the property being transferred, from the time it was first acquired to the time it is about to be sold
• Agreed price of the property
• Size and description of the property
• Promises or covenants the parties will undertake to execute the deed
• Signatures of the parties
• Section for the Governors Consent or Commissioner of Oaths to sign and verify the agreement

If you need help understanding, drafting, or signing a deed of assignment, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.

Hire the top business lawyers and save up to 60% on legal fees

Content Approved by UpCounsel

• Define a Deed
• Contract for Deed California
• Contract for Deed in Texas
• Assignment Law
• Deed Contract Agreement
• Assignment Of Contracts
• Legal Assignment
• Deed vs Agreement
• Assignment Legal Definition
• Contract for a Deed

Assignment and deed of assignment

What is assignment?

Like moveable and immoveable property, claims can also be sold. The transfer of a personal claim is called assignment. A creditor can transfer a personal claim to a third party. This third party will then supersede the original creditor. The creditor who sells the claim is called the assignor, the acquirer of the claim is called the assignee. The debtor is no party to this transfer, but the assignment has consequences for him: he will have to pay his debt to the new creditor.

Deed of assignment

There are some formal requirements for assignment. A distinction can be made between assignments with and without a notice to the debtor. Both forms of assignment have to be effected in writing, by deed of assignment to be more specific. The deed may be drafted between the creditor and the third party (private instrument) or in the presence of a civil-law notary (authentic instrument). The claim that is to be transferred must be sufficiently specified.

Notification of assignment and assignment without notice to the debtor

In case of an assignment with notification, the assignment will have to be notified to the debtor so he will know that he will have to pay to another party, as the debtor is not a party to the transfer. An assignment without notification does not require a notice to the debtor, but the deed of assignment will have to registered with the Tax Authorities. The debtor can be discharged from all his obligations by paying to the original creditor until he is notified of the assignment.

Assignment in practice

Collection agencies often buy up claims of businesses for the purpose of collecting these themselves. This is called factoring. Assignments also often play a part in insurance matters. If an insured party has suffered damage that may be recovered from a third party, the insurer may take over the claim for compensation from the insured party. The insurer then pays out the amount of the claim to the insured party and thus obtains a claim against the third party.

News- letter

• assignments basic law

Assignments: The Basic Law

The assignment of a right or obligation is a common contractual event under the law and the right to assign (or prohibition against assignments) is found in the majority of agreements, leases and business structural documents created in the United States.

As with many terms commonly used, people are familiar with the term but often are not aware or fully aware of what the terms entail. The concept of assignment of rights and obligations is one of those simple concepts with wide ranging ramifications in the contractual and business context and the law imposes severe restrictions on the validity and effect of assignment in many instances. Clear contractual provisions concerning assignments and rights should be in every document and structure created and this article will outline why such drafting is essential for the creation of appropriate and effective contracts and structures.

The reader should first read the article on Limited Liability Entities in the United States and Contracts since the information in those articles will be assumed in this article.

Basic Definitions and Concepts:

An assignment is the transfer of rights held by one party called the “assignor” to another party called the “assignee.” The legal nature of the assignment and the contractual terms of the agreement between the parties determines some additional rights and liabilities that accompany the assignment. The assignment of rights under a contract usually completely transfers the rights to the assignee to receive the benefits accruing under the contract. Ordinarily, the term assignment is limited to the transfer of rights that are intangible, like contractual rights and rights connected with property. Merchants Service Co. v. Small Claims Court , 35 Cal. 2d 109, 113-114 (Cal. 1950).

An assignment will generally be permitted under the law unless there is an express prohibition against assignment in the underlying contract or lease. Where assignments are permitted, the assignor need not consult the other party to the contract but may merely assign the rights at that time. However, an assignment cannot have any adverse effect on the duties of the other party to the contract, nor can it diminish the chance of the other party receiving complete performance. The assignor normally remains liable unless there is an agreement to the contrary by the other party to the contract.

The effect of a valid assignment is to remove privity between the assignor and the obligor and create privity between the obligor and the assignee. Privity is usually defined as a direct and immediate contractual relationship. See Merchants case above.

Further, for the assignment to be effective in most jurisdictions, it must occur in the present. One does not normally assign a future right; the assignment vests immediate rights and obligations.

No specific language is required to create an assignment so long as the assignor makes clear his/her intent to assign identified contractual rights to the assignee. Since expensive litigation can erupt from ambiguous or vague language, obtaining the correct verbiage is vital. An agreement must manifest the intent to transfer rights and can either be oral or in writing and the rights assigned must be certain.

Note that an assignment of an interest is the transfer of some identifiable property, claim, or right from the assignor to the assignee. The assignment operates to transfer to the assignee all of the rights, title, or interest of the assignor in the thing assigned. A transfer of all rights, title, and interests conveys everything that the assignor owned in the thing assigned and the assignee stands in the shoes of the assignor. Knott v. McDonald’s Corp ., 985 F. Supp. 1222 (N.D. Cal. 1997)

The parties must intend to effectuate an assignment at the time of the transfer, although no particular language or procedure is necessary. As long ago as the case of National Reserve Co. v. Metropolitan Trust Co ., 17 Cal. 2d 827 (Cal. 1941), the court held that in determining what rights or interests pass under an assignment, the intention of the parties as manifested in the instrument is controlling.

The intent of the parties to an assignment is a question of fact to be derived not only from the instrument executed by the parties but also from the surrounding circumstances. When there is no writing to evidence the intention to transfer some identifiable property, claim, or right, it is necessary to scrutinize the surrounding circumstances and parties’ acts to ascertain their intentions. Strosberg v. Brauvin Realty Servs., 295 Ill. App. 3d 17 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1998)

The general rule applicable to assignments of choses in action is that an assignment, unless there is a contract to the contrary, carries with it all securities held by the assignor as collateral to the claim and all rights incidental thereto and vests in the assignee the equitable title to such collateral securities and incidental rights. An unqualified assignment of a contract or chose in action, however, with no indication of the intent of the parties, vests in the assignee the assigned contract or chose and all rights and remedies incidental thereto.

More examples: In Strosberg v. Brauvin Realty Servs ., 295 Ill. App. 3d 17 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1998), the court held that the assignee of a party to a subordination agreement is entitled to the benefits and is subject to the burdens of the agreement. In Florida E. C. R. Co. v. Eno , 99 Fla. 887 (Fla. 1930), the court held that the mere assignment of all sums due in and of itself creates no different or other liability of the owner to the assignee than that which existed from the owner to the assignor.

And note that even though an assignment vests in the assignee all rights, remedies, and contingent benefits which are incidental to the thing assigned, those which are personal to the assignor and for his sole benefit are not assigned. Rasp v. Hidden Valley Lake, Inc ., 519 N.E.2d 153, 158 (Ind. Ct. App. 1988). Thus, if the underlying agreement provides that a service can only be provided to X, X cannot assign that right to Y.

Novation Compared to Assignment:

Although the difference between a novation and an assignment may appear narrow, it is an essential one. “Novation is a act whereby one party transfers all its obligations and benefits under a contract to a third party.” In a novation, a third party successfully substitutes the original party as a party to the contract. “When a contract is novated, the other contracting party must be left in the same position he was in prior to the novation being made.”

A sublease is the transfer when a tenant retains some right of reentry onto the leased premises. However, if the tenant transfers the entire leasehold estate, retaining no right of reentry or other reversionary interest, then the transfer is an assignment. The assignor is normally also removed from liability to the landlord only if the landlord consents or allowed that right in the lease. In a sublease, the original tenant is not released from the obligations of the original lease.

Equitable Assignments:

An equitable assignment is one in which one has a future interest and is not valid at law but valid in a court of equity. In National Bank of Republic v. United Sec. Life Ins. & Trust Co. , 17 App. D.C. 112 (D.C. Cir. 1900), the court held that to constitute an equitable assignment of a chose in action, the following has to occur generally: anything said written or done, in pursuance of an agreement and for valuable consideration, or in consideration of an antecedent debt, to place a chose in action or fund out of the control of the owner, and appropriate it to or in favor of another person, amounts to an equitable assignment. Thus, an agreement, between a debtor and a creditor, that the debt shall be paid out of a specific fund going to the debtor may operate as an equitable assignment.

In Egyptian Navigation Co. v. Baker Invs. Corp. , 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30804 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 14, 2008), the court stated that an equitable assignment occurs under English law when an assignor, with an intent to transfer his/her right to a chose in action, informs the assignee about the right so transferred.

An executory agreement or a declaration of trust are also equitable assignments if unenforceable as assignments by a court of law but enforceable by a court of equity exercising sound discretion according to the circumstances of the case. Since California combines courts of equity and courts of law, the same court would hear arguments as to whether an equitable assignment had occurred. Quite often, such relief is granted to avoid fraud or unjust enrichment.

Note that obtaining an assignment through fraudulent means invalidates the assignment. Fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters. It vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments. Walker v. Rich , 79 Cal. App. 139 (Cal. App. 1926). If an assignment is made with the fraudulent intent to delay, hinder, and defraud creditors, then it is void as fraudulent in fact. See our article on Transfers to Defraud Creditors .

But note that the motives that prompted an assignor to make the transfer will be considered as immaterial and will constitute no defense to an action by the assignee, if an assignment is considered as valid in all other respects.

Enforceability of Assignments:

Whether a right under a contract is capable of being transferred is determined by the law of the place where the contract was entered into. The validity and effect of an assignment is determined by the law of the place of assignment. The validity of an assignment of a contractual right is governed by the law of the state with the most significant relationship to the assignment and the parties.

In some jurisdictions, the traditional conflict of laws rules governing assignments has been rejected and the law of the place having the most significant contacts with the assignment applies. In Downs v. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co ., 14 N.Y.2d 266 (N.Y. 1964), a wife and her husband separated and the wife obtained a judgment of separation from the husband in New York. The judgment required the husband to pay a certain yearly sum to the wife. The husband assigned 50 percent of his future salary, wages, and earnings to the wife. The agreement authorized the employer to make such payments to the wife.

After the husband moved from New York, the wife learned that he was employed by an employer in Massachusetts. She sent the proper notice and demanded payment under the agreement. The employer refused and the wife brought an action for enforcement. The court observed that Massachusetts did not prohibit assignment of the husband’s wages. Moreover, Massachusetts law was not controlling because New York had the most significant relationship with the assignment. Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the wife.

Therefore, the validity of an assignment is determined by looking to the law of the forum with the most significant relationship to the assignment itself. To determine the applicable law of assignments, the court must look to the law of the state which is most significantly related to the principal issue before it.

Assignment of Contractual Rights:

Generally, the law allows the assignment of a contractual right unless the substitution of rights would materially change the duty of the obligor, materially increase the burden or risk imposed on the obligor by the contract, materially impair the chance of obtaining return performance, or materially reduce the value of the performance to the obligor. Restat 2d of Contracts, § 317(2)(a). This presumes that the underlying agreement is silent on the right to assign.

If the contract specifically precludes assignment, the contractual right is not assignable. Whether a contract is assignable is a matter of contractual intent and one must look to the language used by the parties to discern that intent.

In the absence of an express provision to the contrary, the rights and duties under a bilateral executory contract that does not involve personal skill, trust, or confidence may be assigned without the consent of the other party. But note that an assignment is invalid if it would materially alter the other party’s duties and responsibilities. Once an assignment is effective, the assignee stands in the shoes of the assignor and assumes all of assignor’s rights. Hence, after a valid assignment, the assignor’s right to performance is extinguished, transferred to assignee, and the assignee possesses the same rights, benefits, and remedies assignor once possessed. Robert Lamb Hart Planners & Architects v. Evergreen, Ltd. , 787 F. Supp. 753 (S.D. Ohio 1992).

On the other hand, an assignee’s right against the obligor is subject to “all of the limitations of the assignor’s right, all defenses thereto, and all set-offs and counterclaims which would have been available against the assignor had there been no assignment, provided that these defenses and set-offs are based on facts existing at the time of the assignment.” See Robert Lamb , case, above.

The power of the contract to restrict assignment is broad. Usually, contractual provisions that restrict assignment of the contract without the consent of the obligor are valid and enforceable, even when there is statutory authorization for the assignment. The restriction of the power to assign is often ineffective unless the restriction is expressly and precisely stated. Anti-assignment clauses are effective only if they contain clear, unambiguous language of prohibition. Anti-assignment clauses protect only the obligor and do not affect the transaction between the assignee and assignor.

Usually, a prohibition against the assignment of a contract does not prevent an assignment of the right to receive payments due, unless circumstances indicate the contrary. Moreover, the contracting parties cannot, by a mere non-assignment provision, prevent the effectual alienation of the right to money which becomes due under the contract.

A contract provision prohibiting or restricting an assignment may be waived, or a party may so act as to be estopped from objecting to the assignment, such as by effectively ratifying the assignment. The power to void an assignment made in violation of an anti-assignment clause may be waived either before or after the assignment. See our article on Contracts.

Noncompete Clauses and Assignments:

Of critical import to most buyers of businesses is the ability to ensure that key employees of the business being purchased cannot start a competing company. Some states strictly limit such clauses, some do allow them. California does restrict noncompete clauses, only allowing them under certain circumstances. A common question in those states that do allow them is whether such rights can be assigned to a new party, such as the buyer of the buyer.

A covenant not to compete, also called a non-competitive clause, is a formal agreement prohibiting one party from performing similar work or business within a designated area for a specified amount of time. This type of clause is generally included in contracts between employer and employee and contracts between buyer and seller of a business.

Many workers sign a covenant not to compete as part of the paperwork required for employment. It may be a separate document similar to a non-disclosure agreement, or buried within a number of other clauses in a contract. A covenant not to compete is generally legal and enforceable, although there are some exceptions and restrictions.

Whenever a company recruits skilled employees, it invests a significant amount of time and training. For example, it often takes years before a research chemist or a design engineer develops a workable knowledge of a company’s product line, including trade secrets and highly sensitive information. Once an employee gains this knowledge and experience, however, all sorts of things can happen. The employee could work for the company until retirement, accept a better offer from a competing company or start up his or her own business.

A covenant not to compete may cover a number of potential issues between employers and former employees. Many companies spend years developing a local base of customers or clients. It is important that this customer base not fall into the hands of local competitors. When an employee signs a covenant not to compete, he or she usually agrees not to use insider knowledge of the company’s customer base to disadvantage the company. The covenant not to compete often defines a broad geographical area considered off-limits to former employees, possibly tens or hundreds of miles.

Another area of concern covered by a covenant not to compete is a potential ‘brain drain’. Some high-level former employees may seek to recruit others from the same company to create new competition. Retention of employees, especially those with unique skills or proprietary knowledge, is vital for most companies, so a covenant not to compete may spell out definite restrictions on the hiring or recruiting of employees.

A covenant not to compete may also define a specific amount of time before a former employee can seek employment in a similar field. Many companies offer a substantial severance package to make sure former employees are financially solvent until the terms of the covenant not to compete have been met.

Because the use of a covenant not to compete can be controversial, a handful of states, including California, have largely banned this type of contractual language. The legal enforcement of these agreements falls on individual states, and many have sided with the employee during arbitration or litigation. A covenant not to compete must be reasonable and specific, with defined time periods and coverage areas. If the agreement gives the company too much power over former employees or is ambiguous, state courts may declare it to be overbroad and therefore unenforceable. In such case, the employee would be free to pursue any employment opportunity, including working for a direct competitor or starting up a new company of his or her own.

It has been held that an employee’s covenant not to compete is assignable where one business is transferred to another, that a merger does not constitute an assignment of a covenant not to compete, and that a covenant not to compete is enforceable by a successor to the employer where the assignment does not create an added burden of employment or other disadvantage to the employee. However, in some states such as Hawaii, it has also been held that a covenant not to compete is not assignable and under various statutes for various reasons that such covenants are not enforceable against an employee by a successor to the employer. Hawaii v. Gannett Pac. Corp. , 99 F. Supp. 2d 1241 (D. Haw. 1999)

It is vital to obtain the relevant law of the applicable state before drafting or attempting to enforce assignment rights in this particular area.

Conclusion:

In the current business world of fast changing structures, agreements, employees and projects, the ability to assign rights and obligations is essential to allow flexibility and adjustment to new situations. Conversely, the ability to hold a contracting party into the deal may be essential for the future of a party. Thus, the law of assignments and the restriction on same is a critical aspect of every agreement and every structure. This basic provision is often glanced at by the contracting parties, or scribbled into the deal at the last minute but can easily become the most vital part of the transaction.

As an example, one client of ours came into the office outraged that his co venturer on a sizable exporting agreement, who had excellent connections in Brazil, had elected to pursue another venture instead and assigned the agreement to a party unknown to our client and without the business contacts our client considered vital. When we examined the handwritten agreement our client had drafted in a restaurant in Sao Paolo, we discovered there was no restriction on assignment whatsoever…our client had not even considered that right when drafting the agreement after a full day of work.

One choses who one does business with carefully…to ensure that one’s choice remains the party on the other side of the contract, one must master the ability to negotiate proper assignment provisions.

Founded in 1939, our law firm combines the ability to represent clients in domestic or international matters with the personal interaction with clients that is traditional to a long established law firm.

Read more about our firm

© 2024, Stimmel, Stimmel & Roeser, All rights reserved  | Terms of Use | Site by Bay Design

Deed of Assignment or Deed of Novation: Key Differences and Legal Implications of Novation and Assignment Contracts

Novation and assignment stand out as pivotal processes for the transfer of contractual rights and obligations. These legal concepts allow a party to the contract to adapt to changing circumstances, ensuring that business arrangements remain relevant and effective. This article explores the nuances of novation and assignment, shedding light on their distinct legal implications, procedures, and practical applications. Whether you’re a business owner navigating the transfer of service contracts, or an individual looking to understand your rights and responsibilities in a contractual relationship, or a key stakeholder in a construction contract, this guide will equip you with the essential knowledge to navigate these complex legal processes.

Table of Contents

• What is a Deed of Novation? 
• What is a Deed of Assignment? 

Key Differences Between Novation and Assignment Deeds

Need a deed of novation or assignment key factors to consider, selecting the right assignment clause for your contract – helping you make the right choice, what is a deed of novation.

Novation is a legal process that allows a new party to a contract to take the place of an original party in a contract, thereby transferring both the responsibilities and benefits under the contract to a third party. In common law, transferring contractual obligations through novation requires the agreement of all original parties involved in the contract, as well as the new party. This is because novation effectively terminates the original contract and establishes a new one.

A novation clause typically specifies that a contract cannot be novated without the written consent of the current parties. The inclusion of such a clause aims to preclude the possibility of novation based on verbal consent or inferred from the actions of a continuing party. Nevertheless, courts will assess the actual events that transpired, and a novation clause may not always be enforceable. It’s possible for a novation clause to allow for future novation by one party acting alone to a party of their choosing. Courts will enforce a novation carried out in this manner if it is sanctioned by the correct interpretation of the original contract.

Novation is frequently encountered in business and contract law, offering a means for parties to transfer their contractual rights and duties to another, which can be useful if the original party cannot meet their obligations or wishes to transfer their contract rights. For novation to occur, there must be unanimous consent for the substitution of the new party for the original one, necessitating a three-way agreement among the original party, the new party, and the remaining contract party. Moreover, the novation agreement must be documented in writing and signed by all involved parties. Understanding novation is essential in the realms of contracts and business dealings, as it provides a way for parties to delegate their contractual rights and responsibilities while freeing themselves from the original agreement.

What is a Deed of Assignment?

A deed of assignment is a legal document that facilitates the transfer of a specific right or benefit from one party (the assignor) to another (the assignee). This process allows the assignee to step into the assignor’s position, taking over both the rights and obligations under the original contract. In construction, this might occur when a main contractor assigns rights under a subcontract to the employer, allowing the employer to enforce specific subcontractor duties directly if the contractor fails.

Key aspects of an assignment include:

• Continuation of the Original Contract: The initial agreement remains valid and enforceable, despite the transfer of rights or benefits.
• Assumption of Rights and Obligations: The assignee assumes the role of the assignor, adopting all associated rights and responsibilities as outlined in the original contract.
• Requirement for Written Form: The assignment must be documented in writing, signed by the assignor, and officially communicated to the obligor (the party obligated under the contract).
• Subject to Terms and Law: The ability to assign rights or benefits is governed by the specific terms of the contract and relevant legal statutes.

At common law, parties generally have the right to assign their contractual rights without needing consent from the other party involved in the contract. However, this does not apply if the rights are inherently personal or if the contract includes an assignment clause that restricts or modifies this general right. Many contracts contain a provision requiring the consent of the other party for an assignment to occur, ensuring that rights are not transferred without the other party’s knowledge.

Once an assignment of rights is made, the assignee gains the right to benefit from the contract and can initiate legal proceedings to enforce these rights. This enforcement can be done either independently or alongside the assignor, depending on whether the assignment is legal or equitable. It’s important to note that while rights under the contract can be assigned, the contractual obligations or burdens cannot be transferred in this manner. Therefore, the assignor remains liable for any obligations under the contract that are not yet fulfilled at the time of the assignment.

Choosing Between Assignment and Novation in a Construction Contract

Choosing between a deed of novation and an assignment agreement depends on the specific circumstances and objectives of the parties involved in a contract. Both options serve to transfer rights and obligations but in fundamentally different ways, each with its own legal implications, risks, and benefits. Understanding these differences and considering various factors can help in making an informed decision that aligns with your goals.

The choice between assignment and novation in a construction project scenario, where, for instance, an employer wishes to engage a subcontractor directly due to loss of confidence in the main contractor, hinges on several factors. These are:

• Nature of the Contract:  The type of contract you’re dealing with (e.g., service, sales) can influence which option is more suitable. For instance, novation might be preferred for service contracts where obligations are personal and specific to the original parties.
• Parties Involved: Consent is a key factor. Novation requires the agreement of all original and new parties, making it a viable option only when such consent is attainable. Assignment might be more feasible if obtaining consent from all parties poses a challenge.
• Complexity of the Transaction: For transactions involving multiple parties and obligations, novation could be more appropriate as it ensures a clean transfer of all rights and obligations. Assignment might leave the original party with ongoing responsibilities.
• Time and Cost: Consider the practical aspects, such as the time and financial cost associated with each option. Novation typically involves more complex legal processes and might be more time-consuming and costly than an assignment.

If the intention is merely to transfer the rights of the subcontractor’s work to the employer without altering the subcontractor’s obligations under a contract, an assignment might suffice. However, if the goal is to completely transfer the main contractor’s contractual role and obligations to the employer or another entity, novation would be necessary, ensuring that all parties consent to this new arrangement and the original contractor is released from their obligations.

The legal interpretations and court decisions highlight the importance of the document’s substance over its label. Even if a document is titled a “Deed of Assignment,” it could function as a novation if it transfers obligations and responsibilities and involves the consent of all parties. The key is to clearly understand and define the objective behind changing the contractual relationships and to use a deed — assignment or novation — that best achieves the desired legal and practical outcomes, ensuring the continuity and successful completion of the construction project.

Understanding the distinction between assignment deeds and novation deeds is crucial for anyone involved in contractual agreements. Novation offers a clean slate by transferring both rights and obligations to a new party, requiring the consent of all involved. Assignment, conversely, allows for the transfer of contractual benefits without altering the original contract’s obligations. Each method serves different strategic purposes, from simplifying transitions to preserving original contractual duties. The choice between novation and assignment hinges on specific legal, financial, and practical considerations unique to each situation. At PBL Law Group, we specialise in providing comprehensive legal advice and support in contract law. Our team is dedicated to helping clients understand their options and make informed decisions that align with their legal and business objectives. Let’s discuss!

Authored By Raea Khan

Director Lawyer, PBL Law Group

Find what you need

Share this article, book a 15-min consultation​, rated 5-star by our clients, latest insights & practical guides.

Guide to Owners Corporation Insurance Requirements in Strata Properties

For strata managers and owners corporations, insurance is a critical

Visitor Parking Spaces, Strata Parking Rules and Parking Levies in NSW

Parking in strata properties can be a complex and contentious

Proving Systemic Building Defects in Strata – The Owners v SPS Building Contractors

Systemic defects in strata buildings can be a hidden yet

Speak to us Now or Request a Consultation.

How can our expert lawyers help.

Property and strata disputes, building defects claims, setting up new Owners Corporations and more…

Construction & Building Law

Construction and building disputes, building defects, delays and claims, debt recovery and more…

International Estate Planning

Cross-border estate planning, international wills and trusts, tax-efficient wealth transfer strategies and more…

Commercial & Business Law

Starting and scaling your business, banking and business financing, bankruptcy and insolvency and more…

Planning & Environment Law

Environment and planning regulation, land and environment court disputes, sub-divisions and more…

Wills & Estates

Creating, updating and contesting wills, estate planning and administration, probate applications and more…

Get In Touch

Helpful links, site information, how we can help.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Copyright © 2024 PBL Law Group. All Rights Reserved

Built by Commersion.Legal

Thank You For Your Request.

We’ve received your consultation request and will contact you within the next 24 hours (excluding weekends).

• Now Trending:
• UNDERSTANDING TENANCIES ...
• THE SENIOR PARTNER OF PR...
• Dr. Prince O. Williams-J...
• How To Pick The Right Ho...

DEED OF ASSIGNMENT: EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW.

A Deed of Assignment refers to a legal document in which an assignor states his willingness to assign the ownership of his property to the assignee. The Deed of Assignment is required to effect a transfer of property and to show the legal right to possess it. It is always a subject of debate whether Deed of Assignment is a contract; a Deed of Assignment is actually a contract where the owner (the “assignor”) transfers ownership over certain property to another person (the “assignee”) by way of assignment. As a result of the assignment, the assignee steps into the shoes of the assignor and assumes all the rights and obligations pertaining to the property.

In Nigeria, a Deed of Assignment is one of the legal documents that transfer authentic legal ownership in a property. There are several other documents like a deed of gifts, Assent, etc. However, this article focuses on the deed of assignment.

It is the written proof of ownership that stipulates the kind of rights or interests being transferred to the buyer which is a legal interest.

Read Also: DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TRANSFER OF PROPERTY THROUGH WILLS AND DEED OF GIFT

CONTENTS OF A DEED OF ASSIGNMENT

Content of a Deed of Assignment matters a lot to the transaction and special skill is needed for a hitch-free transaction. The contents of a deed of assignment can be divided into 3 namely; the introductory part, the second (usually the operative part), and the concluding part.

• THE INTRODUCTORY PART: This part enumerates the preliminary matters such as the commencement date, parties in the transaction, and recitals. The parties mentioned in the deed must be legal persons which can consist of natural persons and entities with corporate personality, the name, address, and status of the parties must be included. The proper descriptions of the parties are the assignor (seller) and assignee (buyer). The Recitals give the material facts constituting the background to the current transaction in chronological order.
• THE SECOND PART (USUALLY THE OPERATIVE PART): This is the part where the interest or title in the property is actually transferred from the assignor to the assignee. It is more like the engine room of the deed of assignment. The operative part usually starts with testatum and it provides for other important clauses such as the consideration (price) of the property, the accepted receipt by the assignor, the description of the property, and the terms and conditions of the transaction.
• The testimonium : this shows that all the parties are involved in the execution of the deed.
• Execution : this means signing. The capacity of the parties (either individual, corporate bodies, illiterates) is of great essence in the mode of execution.  It is important to note that the type of parties involved determines how they will sign. Example 2 directors or a director/secretary will sign if a company is involved. In the same way, if an association, couple, individual, illiterate, family land (omonile), firm, unregistered association, etc. is involved the format of signature would be different.
• Attestation : this refers to the witnessing of the execution of the deed by witnesses.

For a Deed of Assignment to be effective, it must include a column for the Governor of the state or a representative of the Government where the property is, to sign/consent to the transaction. By virtue of Sec. 22 of the Land Use Act, and Sec. 10 Land Instrument Registration Law, the Governor must consent to the transaction.

Do you have any further questions? feel free to call Ibejulekkilawyer on 08034869295 or send a mail to [email protected] and we shall respond accordingly.

Disclaimer: The above is for information purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Ibejulekkilawyer.com (blog) shall not be liable to any person(s) for any damage or liability arising whatsoever following the reliance of the information contained herein. Consult us or your legal practitioner for legal advice.

Only 22% of poorest Nigerian households have electricity access –World Bank

Related Posts

Global Corporate Limited v Dirk Stefan Hale [2017] EWHC 2277 (Ch) 

A recent judgment re-iterates the importance of carefully drafting a deed of assignment when assigning claims.

In Global Corporate , the liquidators of a company assigned certain claims by way of a deed of assignment to Global Corporate Limited (the “ Assignee ”). The Assignee (the Applicant in this case) then brought several claims against the company’s former director and shareholder.

Two of the Assignee’s claims were dismissed because, as the High Court held, only the claims expressly set out in in the transfer documentation were transferred to the Assignee. As the other claims had not been provided for in the deed of assignment, they failed for lack of standing.

Powerstation UK Ltd (the “Company”) entered liquidation in November 2015 and liquidators were appointed.

The liquidators identified various claims against a former director of the Company. The claims related to payments to the former director which, in the liquidators’ view, constituted an unlawful dividend or, in the alternative, a transaction at an undervalue.

The Assignee agreed to purchase the claims from the liquidators. The assignment of claims was recorded in a deed of assignment dated 25 August 2016 between the liquidators and the Assignee (the “ Deed ”). Under the terms of the Deed, the liquidators assigned the ‘claim’. ‘Claim’ was defined as (emphasis added) “a potential debt to the company comprising alleged illegal dividends and/or transactions at an undervalue ”.

The Assignee subsequently brought claims against the former director on the basis that the payments to him constituted either:

• unlawful dividends;
• a transaction at an undervalue;
• a preference; or
• misfeasance.

On the unlawful dividends claim, the judge, His Honour Judge Matthews, concluded that the Company’s articles did not allow the former director to declare provisional dividends capable of being subsequently re-categorised (which the judge found was the nature of the payments made to the former director). Therefore, whatever the payments were, they were not dividends and so could not be unlawful. This removed the Assignee’s prospects of seeking recovery of unlawful dividends pursuant to section 847 of the Companies Act 2006.

The transaction at an undervalue claim failed on the basis that sufficient consideration had been given.

On the remaining claims (misfeasance and preference), HHJ Matthews said that the Assignee did not have standing as the Deed did not mention these claims.

At para 45 HHJ Matthews said, in respect of the misfeasance claim:

‘There is some difficulty here with the applicant’s title to sue, since the deed of assignment did not on its face extend to any claim in respect of director’s misfeasance.'

At para 66 HHJ Matthews noted that, as regards the preference claim:

‘The applicant is not an assignee of any claim of the company or the liquidators in respect of a preference...The first reference to a claim to set aside a preference that I have been able to find in the documents comes out in the application notice of 12 September 2016... But this cannot operate so as to confer on the applicant a title to sue that he otherwise would not have.’

HHJ Matthews emphasised that a preference claim could not be implied into the Deed due to the material differences between a transaction at an undervalue and a preference. If the Assignee wanted to acquire a right to bring a preference claim, the Deed should have expressly mentioned it.

At para 67 HHJ Matthews commented that:

‘A preference is not the same as a transaction at an undervalue, and neither is there necessarily an example of the former every time there is the latter. If the applicant wished to take an assignment of the claim to set aside a preference, it should have drafted the deed of 25 August 2016 so as to achieve this end.’

Finally, the court held that while the liquidators of the Company did retain the right to bring a claim to set aside a preference, they were not parties to the application and an effective order could therefore not be made.

Consequences

This case highlights the importance of thoroughly reviewing the deed of assignment where claims are being acquired.

Only those rights of action expressly mentioned in a deed of assignment will be transferred to the assignee. The court will not allow an assignee to bring an action which has not been included in the wording of the assignment. Further, the court will not imply alternative causes of action into deeds of assignment where those actions have material differences from those actually transferred.

Filed under

• United Kingdom
• Insolvency & Restructuring
• Charles Russell Speechlys
• Liquidation
• Companies Act 2006 (UK)
• High Court of Justice (England & Wales)

Popular articles from this firm

Labour's life sciences planning reform *, former f1 boss claims hsbc mis-sold ‘low-risk’ bond linked to high-risk property markets *, update on the arbitration bill *, supreme court gives guidance on errors in statutory notices concerning property *, is it really against the law to share your netflix password *.

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected] .

Professional development

Members Voluntary Liquidations - What To Consider & Why - Learn Live

Restructuring Plans - Practical Tips & Important Recent Developments - Learn Live

Rights & Remedies for Minority Shareholders

Related practical resources PRO

• How-to guide How-to guide: The legal framework for resolving disputes in England and Wales (UK)
• Checklist Checklist: Considerations prior to issuing court proceedings (UK)
• How-to guide How-to guide: How to manage the risk of contracting with a company in financial difficulty (UK)

Related research hubs

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Our Cookie Notice is part of our Privacy Notice and explains in detail how and why we use cookies. To take full advantage of our website, we recommend that you click on “Accept All”. You can change these settings at any time via the button “Update Cookie Preferences” in our Cookie Notice .

Technical cookies are required for the site to function properly, to be legally compliant and secure. Session cookies only last for the duration of your visit and are deleted from your device when you close your internet browser. Persistent cookies, however, remain and continue functioning on repeat visits.

CMS does not use any cookie based Analytics or tracking on our websites; see details here .

Personalisation cookies collect information about your website browsing habits and offer you a personalised user experience based on past visits, your location or browser settings. They also allow you to log in to personalised areas and to access third party tools that may be embedded in our website. Some functionality will not work if you don’t accept these cookies.

Social Media cookies collect information about you sharing information from our website via social media tools, or analytics to understand your browsing between social media tools or our Social Media campaigns and our own websites. We do this to optimise the mix of channels to provide you with our content. Details concerning the tools in use are in our Privacy Notice .

How to bookmark a page on iPhone 

• Tap the Share button at the bottom of the Safari screen for the website you're on
• Tap the icon labelled 'Add to Home Screen'
• Tap the 'Add' button in the upper right corner
• Launch the website from your Home screen by tapping its icon.

How to bookmark a page on Android 

• Click on the 'menu' button.
• Click on the 'start' button and save as a bookmark.
• Click on the 'menu' button again and select "Bookmarks".
• Press and hold the LawNow icon and then click "Add to home screen".

How to bookmark a page on Windows 

• Click on the "..." icon in the bottom-right of the screen.
• Select "pin to start"
• A new tile linking to LawNow will now appear on the start menu

How to bookmark a page on Blackberry 

• Click on the BlackBerry 'menu' icon.
• Select "Add to Home Screen".
• In the "Add to Home Screen" dialog window, select the "add" button.

Search Filters

• Member log in

Jurisdiction / Region

Our combination of practice excellence and deep industry expertise provides a distinct competitive advantage to our clients, bringing together legal expertise, commercial insight and close professional support.

• Bosnia and Herzegovina
• Czech Republic
• Latin America
• Middle East
• Netherlands
• North Macedonia
• Saudi Arabia
• South Africa
• Switzerland
• United Arab Emirates
• United Kingdom
• Consumer Products (all)
• Consumer Products - fashion & luxury
• Consumer Products - FMCG
• Consumer Products - food & drink
• Consumer Products - retail
• Data Centres
• Energy (all)
• Energy - Conventional Power
• Energy - Nuclear
• Energy - Oil & Gas
• Energy - Power
• Energy - Renewables & Climate
• Energy - Water
• Higher Education
• Hotels & Leisure
• Infrastructure & Projects
• Life Sciences
• Manufacturing
• Private Equity
• Public Sector
• Real Estate & Construction
• Technology, Media and Communications

Our Expertise

• ADR/mediation
• Advertising & Marketing
• Agriculture
• Anti-bribery & Corruption
• Asset Finance
• Asset Management, Funds and Capital Investment Law
• Banking & Finance
• Class actions
• Commercial & General Business Issues
• Commercial Contracts
• Commercial Distribution
• Communications
• Competition/antitrust
• Construction
• Corporate Finance
• Corporate Law & Transactions
• Corporate Recovery & Insolvency
• Criminal Law
• Crypto, FinTech & Digital Assets
• Data Protection & Privacy
• Debt Capital Markets
• Derivatives & Structured Finance
• Directors' Issues
• Distribution and Franchising
• Employee Share Schemes
• Energy Disputes
• Environment
• Environment - Cleantech
• Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)
• Equity Capital Markets
• EU Sales Law
• Financial Institutions Regulation
• Health and Safety
• Hotels - Financing
• Infrastructure
• Insolvency law & restructuring
• Insurance & Reinsurance
• Intellectual Property
• International Arbitration
• Investigations & Dawn Raids
• Investing in Europe
• Investment Arbitration
• Islamic finance
• IT Security Law
• Life Sciences - Healthcare
• Life Sciences - Regulation
• MBOs/MBIs & Private Equity
• Merger Control
• Mergers & Acquisitions
• Mining and Minerals
• Outsourcing
• Personal Injury
• Private Clients
• Procurement
• Product Liability
• Professional Indemnity/ Negligence
• Projects & Project Finance
• Real Estate
• Real Estate - Finance
• Sustainability
• Tax - Transfer Pricing
• US Securities

Contracts: The critical difference between Assignment and Novation

Introduction

An assignment of rights under a contract is normally restricted to the benefit of the contract. Where a party wishes to transfer both the benefit and burden of the contract this generally needs to be done by way of a novation. The distinction between assignment and novation was addressed recently in the case of Davies v Jones (2009), whereby the court considered whether a deed of assignment of the rights under a contract could also transfer a positive contractual obligation, which in this instance included the obligation to pay.

Mr Jones (the first defendant) contracted to sell Lidl (the second defendant) a freehold property (the “Lidl Contract”). At that time, the freehold was vested in the claimants as trustees of a retired benefit scheme. Mr Jones contracted to buy the land from the claimants (the “ Trustee Contract”) and assigned his right, title and interest to the Trustee Contract to Lidl by way of a deed of assignment.

Clause 18 of the Trustee Contract permitted Mr Jones, as purchaser, to retain £100,000 from the purchase monies payable to the claimants until the outstanding works (ground clearance and site preparation) had been completed. Following completion of the works Mr Jones was entitled to retain one half of the proper costs from the retention and release the balance to the claimants. There was a similar clause in the Lidl Contract, which allowed Lidl to retain the proper costs from the retention. Importantly, although similar, under the Lidl Contract Lidl was entitled to retain the whole cost of carrying out the works as against only half in the Trustee Contract.

Lidl retained the sum of £100,000 from the money due by Mr Jones to the claimants on completion of the contract. Once the works were completed Mr Jones failed to pay the claimant the retention monies claiming that the proper cost of the works was over £200,000.

The claimants argued that the benefits granted by way of the assignment were conditional on Lidl performing Mr Jones’ obligations under the Trustee Contract. Therefore, the question considered by the court was whether Lidl was bound to observe the terms of the Trustee Contract and in particular clause 18, given that benefit of the contract had been assigned to them.

The court held that the benefit which passed to Lidl by way of the deed of assignment did not require Lidl to perform the obligations of Mr Jones under the Trustee Contract. The assignment did not impose any burden on Lidl. The only person who clause 18 of the Trustee Contract was binding on was Mr Jones. The transfer to Lidl could not impose on Lidl the obligation to perform Mr Jones’ obligations and these therefore remained with Mr Jones. This reaffirms the principle that when you take an assignment of a contract, you don’t take on the burden (except in limited circumstances where enjoyment of the benefit is conditional on complying with some formality). Therefore, if an owner assigns a building contract to a purchaser of land and the building is still under construction, the obligation to pay the contractor remains with the original owner and does not pass to the new owner.

Assignment and novation in the Construction Industry

Both assignment and novation are common within the construction industry and careful consideration is required as to which mechanism is suitable. Assignments are frequently used in relation to collateral warranties, whereby the benefit of a contract is transferred to a third party. Likewise, an assignment of rights to a third party with an interest in a project may be suitable when the Employer still needs to fulfil certain obligations under the contract, for example, where works are still in progress. A novation is appropriate where the original contracting party wants the obligations under the contract to rest with a third party. This is commonly seen in a design and build scenario whereby the Employer novates the consultants’ contracts to the Contractor, so that the benefit and burden of the appointments are transferred, and the Employer benefits from a single point of responsibility in the form of the Contractor.

If the intention is that the assignee is to accept both the benefit and burden of a contract, it is not normally sufficient to rely on a deed of assignment, as the burden of the contract remains with the assignor. In these instances a novation would be a preferable method of transferring obligations, and this allows for both the benefit and burden to be transferred to the new party and leaves no residual liability with the transferor.

Reference: Davies v Jones [2009] EWCA Civ 1164.

Related content

Ukraine launches large-scale privatisation, court of appeal clarifies termination for repeated breach and late payment under the jct, eu commission finetunes the foreign subsidies regulation: insights into the latest guidance.

• Follow us on:
• LinkedIn  

© CMS Legal 2024

• Terms of Use
• Privacy Notice
• Cookie Notice

Deed of assignment of lease and landlord's consent (NSW) | Practical Law

Deed of assignment of lease and landlord's consent (NSW)

Practical law anz standard document w-032-8886  (approx. 39 pages).

• Insights & events

Assigning debts and other contractual claims - not as easy as first thought

Harking back to law school, we had a thirst for new black letter law. Section 136 of the Law of the Property Act 1925 kindly obliged. This lays down the conditions which need to be satisfied for an effective legal assignment of a chose in action (such as a debt). We won’t bore you with the detail, but suffice to say that what’s important is that a legal assignment must be in writing and signed by the assignor, must be absolute (i.e. no conditions attached) and crucially that written notice of the assignment must be given to the debtor.

When assigning debts, it’s worth remembering that you can’t legally assign part of a debt – any attempt to do so will take effect as an equitable assignment. The main practical difference between a legal and an equitable assignment is that the assignor will need to be joined in any legal proceedings in relation to the assigned debt (e.g. an attempt to recover that part of the debt).

Recent cases which tell another story

Why bother telling you the above?  Aside from our delight in remembering the joys of debating the merits of legal and equitable assignments (ehem), it’s worth revisiting our textbooks in the context of three recent cases. Although at first blush the statutory conditions for a legal assignment seem quite straightforward, attempts to assign contractual claims such as debts continue to throw up legal disputes:

• In  Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp Europe Ltd v Euler Hermes Europe SA (NV) [2019] EWHC 2250 (Comm),  the High Court held that a performance bond issued under a construction contract was not effectively assigned despite the surety acknowledging a notice of assignment of the bond. Sadly, the notice of assignment failed to meet the requirements under the bond instrument that the assignee confirm its acceptance of a provision in the bond that required the employer to repay the surety in the event of an overpayment. This case highlights the importance of ensuring any purported assignment meets any conditions stipulated in the underlying documents.
• In  Promontoria (Henrico) Ltd v Melton [2019] EWHC 2243 (Ch) (26 June 2019) , the High Court held that an assignment of a facility agreement and legal charges was valid, even though the debt assigned had to be identified by considering external evidence. The deed of assignment in question listed the assets subject to assignment, but was illegible to the extent that the debtor’s name could not be deciphered. The court got comfortable that there had been an effective assignment, given the following factors: (i) the lender had notified the borrower of its intention to assign the loan to the assignee; (ii) following the assignment, the lender had made no demand for repayment; (iii) a manager of the assignee had given a statement that the loan had been assigned and the borrower had accepted in evidence that he was aware of the assignment. Fortunately for the assignee, a second notice of assignment - which was invalid because it contained an incorrect date of assignment - did not invalidate the earlier assignment, which was found to be effective. The court took a practical and commercial view of the circumstances, although we recommend ensuring that your assignment documents clearly reflect what the parties intend!
• Finally, in Nicoll v Promontoria (Ram 2) Ltd [2019] EWHC 2410 (Ch),  the High Court held that a notice of assignment of a debt given to a debtor was valid, even though the effective date of assignment stated in the notice could not be verified by the debtor. The case concerned a debt assigned by the Co-op Bank to Promontoria and a joint notice given by assignor and assignee to the debtor that the debt had been assigned “on and with effect from 29 July 2016”. A subsequent statutory demand served by Promontoria on the debtor for the outstanding sums was disputed on the basis that the notice of assignment was invalid because it contained an incorrect date of assignment. Whilst accepting that the documentation was incapable of verifying with certainty the date of assignment, the Court held that the joint notice clearly showed that both parties had agreed that an assignment had taken place and was valid. This decision suggests that mistakes as to the date of assignment in a notice of assignment may not necessarily be fatal, if it is otherwise clear that the debt has been assigned.

The conclusion from the above? Maybe it’s not quite as easy as first thought to get an assignment right. Make sure you follow all of the conditions for a legal assignment according to the underlying contract and ensure your assignment documentation is clear.

Contact our experts for further advice

Necessary cookies . These are cookies which are necessary for the operation of our website. We set these cookies so that they are always on.

Analytics and other third-party cookies . We would like to use analytics and limited other third-party cookies to improve our website and your experience using it. These cookies collect and report information to us about your browsing activity on our website. If you are happy to allow us to use these cookies, please click “all cookies” or you can turn individual cookies on by clicking "manage cookies". You can change your preferences at any time by visiting our cookie details page.

We use cookies on our website, details of which are set out below.

Necessary cookies

These are cookies which are necessary for the operation of our website. We set these cookies so that they are always on, although you may be able to disable these cookies via your browser if you wish. Please note that if these cookies are disabled then you may not be able to use some or all of the functionality of our website.

Ideally over time we would like to be able to improve our website and your experience using it. We would like to deploy analytics cookies to enable us to do this, which would collect and report information to us about your browsing activity on our website. However, we will only use these cookies with your consent and these cookies are switched off until you opt to turn them on. Click here for a full list of analytics cookies used on our website.

Third-party cookies are set by our partners and help us to improve your experience of the website. Click here for a full list of third-party plugins used on our website.

Search our site

• Practical Law

New: Deed of assignment

Practical law uk legal update 1-202-1081  (approx. 3 pages).

• The assignor is assigning the whole of the property demised by the lease.
• The property is not subject to any underlease(s).
• Where the assignee is paying a premium to the assignor or the assignor is paying a reverse premium to the assignee.
• Where the assignee gives an express indemnity covenant in respect of the rent and other obligations under the lease and/or in relation to matters contained in title documents affecting the property.
• Where the lease is being held over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 and also where the assignor has commenced renewal proceedings.
• Where one party is paying, or making a contribution to, the legal (and surveyors') costs of the other.
• Considers in greater detail the various general issues affecting assignments of unregistered leases.
• Provides guidance on the legal, and drafting and negotiating, issues raised by each clause.

New Standard document and Drafting note

• Deed of assignment .
• Deed of assignment: drafting note .
• Landlord and Tenant

Deed Of Assignment Of Reversionary Interest

In the realm of property and estate law, a deed of assignment of reversionary interest plays a crucial role in transferring future ownership rights or interests in property. This legal document facilitates the transfer of a reversionary interest, which is the right to possess or enjoy property in the future upon the occurrence of a specific event, such as the expiration of a lease or the end of a life estate. This article explores what a deed of assignment of reversionary interest entails, its importance, key components, and practical considerations.

Table of Contents

What is a Deed of Assignment of Reversionary Interest?

A deed of assignment of reversionary interest is a legal instrument used to transfer the rights or interests in property that will revert to the assignor (transferor) upon the fulfillment of certain conditions. It allows the assignor to transfer their future interest in the property to another party, known as the assignee, who will assume those rights or interests once they come into effect.

Importance of Deed of Assignment of Reversionary Interest

• Facilitates Property Transactions : It enables property owners to transfer future ownership rights, ensuring clarity and legal certainty in property transactions.
• Estate Planning and Succession : Assignors can use it as a tool in estate planning to transfer reversionary interests to beneficiaries or heirs, ensuring smooth succession of property rights.
• Legal Clarity and Certainty : By documenting the transfer of reversionary interests, the deed provides clarity on ownership rights, helping to avoid disputes or uncertainties in the future.

Key Components of a Deed of Assignment of Reversionary Interest

• Parties Involved : Identifies the assignor (transferor) and the assignee (transferee) involved in the transfer of reversionary interest.
• Property Details : Specifies the property or asset to which the reversionary interest applies, including its location and any relevant identifiers.
• Conditions and Considerations : Outlines the conditions under which the reversionary interest will be transferred, such as the expiration of a lease term or the occurrence of a specified event.
• Consideration : Specifies any consideration or payment exchanged between the parties in exchange for the assignment of reversionary interest.
• Signatures and Witnesses : Requires signatures of both parties, often in the presence of witnesses or a notary public, to validate the deed’s legality and enforceability.

Practical Considerations in Drafting and Executing

• Legal Expertise : It’s advisable to consult with a qualified legal professional experienced in property law to draft or review the deed of assignment of reversionary interest to ensure compliance with local laws and regulations.
• Clear and Precise Language : Use clear and precise language to describe the reversionary interest being assigned and the conditions under which it will revert to the assignee.
• Recording and Registration : Depending on jurisdictional requirements, consider recording or registering the deed with relevant authorities to establish a public record of the transfer of reversionary interest.
• Tax Implications : Be aware of any tax implications associated with the transfer of reversionary interests, such as stamp duty or capital gains tax, and ensure compliance with tax laws.

Example Scenario: Assignment of Lease Reversionary Interest

Scenario : A property owner holds a leasehold interest in a commercial property with 10 years remaining on the lease term. The owner anticipates selling the property before the lease expires and wishes to transfer the future reversionary interest to a potential buyer.

Deed of Assignment : The deed would specify that upon the expiration of the lease term, the reversionary interest in the property will transfer from the current owner to the buyer, contingent upon the completion of the sale transaction.

A deed of assignment of reversionary interest serves as a vital legal instrument in property transactions, estate planning, and succession. By facilitating the transfer of future ownership rights or interests in property, it ensures clarity, legal certainty, and compliance with regulatory requirements. Whether used in commercial real estate transactions, estate planning, or other property-related matters, understanding the components and implications of this deed is essential for property owners, investors, and legal professionals alike. By adhering to best practices and seeking professional guidance when necessary, stakeholders can navigate the complexities of reversionary interests and property transfers effectively and responsibly.

Drafting a Deed of Assignment

Try our Legal AI - it's free while in beta 🚀

Genie's Legal AI can draft , risk-review and negotiate 1000s of legal documents

Note: Want to skip the guide and go straight to the free templates? No problem - scroll to the bottom. Also note: This is not legal advice.

Introduction

A Deed of Assignment is a vital legal document used to transfer rights, interests or assets between parties. It is regularly used in business transactions, and often regarding real estate or intellectual property. A well-crafted deed of assignment can protect both sides from potential legal disputes, ensuring that everyone involved understands their obligations and responsibilities.

The Genie AI team has seen many instances where having a valid deed of assignment can make all the difference - without it businesses could be exposed to considerable risk. That’s why we offer free templates and step-by-step guides to help those wishing to draft their own deed.

When creating a Deed of Assignment it is important to take the specific circumstances into account - any changes or additions should be accurately documented and agreed by all involved parties beforehand. Furthermore, it is essential that the terms are clearly written out in an unambiguous way so every party knows exactly what they have signed up for. Beyond protecting both sides’ interests, this type of agreement can also be used for copyright assignments, leases, debt transfers and trusts.

Before signing on the dotted line it’s also critical that executing such documentation is done properly - all parties must sign in the presence of a witness who will also affix their signature and date the document accordingly. Once this process has been completed filings must then be made with any relevant government authorities whenever necessary (especially in cases involving real estate or intellectual property transfers).

In summary, drafting a Deed of Assignment not only safeguards everyone’s best interests but also provides additional benefits depending on its use case - reading through our step-by-step guidance below should provide you with more information on how to access our template library today and start benefitting from its advantages without needing to sign up for an account with Genie AI first!

Definitions (feel free to skip)

Legal Binding: When a legally binding document is used, it means that all parties involved are legally obligated to follow the terms and conditions set forth in the document.

Assignor: The assignor is the person who is transferring rights, interests or assets to someone else.

Assignee: The assignee is the person who is receiving the rights, interests or assets from the assignor.

Witness: A witness is an independent third-party who is present when a document is signed, in order to ensure that the process is completed in a secure and legally binding manner.

Stamp: A stamp is an official seal or mark that is used to verify and authenticate a document.

Tax: A tax is a sum of money that is paid to a government or public authority.

Duty: Duty is an obligation or responsibility assigned to someone.

Defining the Deed of Assignment

What is a deed of assignment and what is its purpose, parties involved, who needs to be involved in the making of a deed of assignment, drafting the deed, determine what kind of deed of assignment needs to be drafted, consider the subject matter to be assigned in the deed, research the legal requirements for the kind of deed to be drafted, draft the deed of assignment in accordance with the legal requirements, executing the deed, check that the parties to the deed are correctly identified, confirm that the deed is correctly signed and dated by all parties, confirm that the deed is witnessed by an independent third party, have the deed of assignment properly executed by all parties, registration, determine whether the deed of assignment needs to be registered, if registration is necessary, confirm the registration procedures, take necessary steps to register the deed of assignment, considerations, consider any applicable tax or stamp duty implications of the deed of assignment, consider any restrictions or limitations on the rights being assigned, consider whether the deed of assignment needs to be registered in any public records, common mistakes, not accurately identifying all of the parties to the deed, not having the deed properly executed by all parties, not having the deed witnessed by an independent third party, not considering any applicable tax or stamp duty implications, not considering any applicable restrictions or limitations on the rights being assigned, record keeping, ensure that the original deed of assignment is securely stored, create a digital copy of the deed and store it in a secure manner, review the deed of assignment to ensure accuracy, confirm that all steps have been completed correctly, seek advice from legal professionals if necessary, get started.

• Establish the parties involved in the Deed of Assignment
• Identify the property or service being assigned
• Specify the terms of the assignment
• Ensure the Deed of Assignment is properly witnessed
• Check that all signatures are valid

When you have completed the steps above, you will have successfully defined the Deed of Assignment and can proceed to the next step.

• A deed of assignment is a legal document that is used to transfer the rights and responsibilities of one party (the assignor) to another party (the assignee)
• It is used to transfer contractual rights and obligations between parties
• It should include information such as the names of the parties, the date of the assignment, and the description of the rights transferred
• You will know that you have completed this step when you have an understanding of what a deed of assignment is and why it is used.
• Identify the party transferring their rights (the assignor) and the party receiving the rights (the assignee)
• Draft the deed in the name of both parties, including full names and contact details
• Ensure the deed is signed by both the assignor and assignee
• Once the deed is signed, the parties should exchange copies of the document

Once the assignor and assignee have been identified and the deed has been drafted and signed, you can check this step off your list and move on to the next step.

• Identify the parties involved in the Deed of Assignment. This would typically include the assignor (the party transferring their rights or interest) and the assignee (the party receiving the rights or interest).
• Ensure that all parties involved have the legal capacity to enter into a contract.
• When all parties have been identified and their legal capacity has been verified, you can check this step off your list and move on to drafting the Deed.
• Read the applicable laws in your jurisdiction to determine the required language and structure of the Deed of Assignment
• Gather the necessary information on the parties, the asset being assigned, and other relevant details
• Draft the Deed of Assignment, taking into account all the necessary details
• Make sure the language is clear and unambiguous
• Have the Deed of Assignment reviewed by a legal professional
• When the Deed of Assignment has been drafted and reviewed, you can move on to the next step.
• Identify the type of assignment that needs to be drafted and the legal requirements that need to be satisfied
• Consider the purpose of the Deed and the rights and obligations of the parties to the Deed
• Determine if the Deed is for an absolute or conditional assignment
• Consider if the Deed should be an express or implied assignment
• Determine if the Deed needs to be in writing or if it can be oral
• Check the applicable laws in your jurisdiction to ensure that you are drafting a valid Deed
• Check if there are any additional requirements that need to be included in the Deed

When you can check this off your list: Once you have identified the type of assignment and the relevant legal requirements, you can move on to considering the subject matter to be assigned in the Deed.

• Identify the subject matter of the Deed of Assignment, such as a patent, trademark, copyright, or other intellectual property
• Assess the value of the subject matter and any associated liabilities
• Understand the relationship between the assignor and assignee
• Have all necessary documents, such as a purchase agreement, to provide more detail about the assignment

Once you have identified the subject matter of the Deed of Assignment, assessed its value, understand the relationship between the assignor and assignee, and gathered any additional documents, you can move onto the next step of researching the legal requirements for the kind of Deed to be drafted.

• Research the relevant legislation, case law, and other materials related to the Deed of Assignment to be drafted
• Consult with a lawyer familiar with the relevant law to understand the requirements
• Take detailed notes on the legal requirements that must be adhered to in the Deed of Assignment
• Once you have all the necessary information, double-check that you understand the requirements before moving on to the next step.
• Prepare the text of the Deed, ensuring that all relevant information regarding the parties, the subject matter, and the consideration is included
• Check to make sure the language conforms with relevant laws and regulations
• Have the Deed reviewed by a solicitor to ensure that it complies with all legal requirements
• Once the Deed has been approved by a solicitor, have the parties sign the document
• Once the Deed has been signed by both parties, make multiple copies and ensure each party has a copy
• This step is complete once the Deed has been signed and each party has a copy of the document.
• Ensure both parties sign the Deed of Assignment in the presence of two witnesses who are over the age of 18 and not parties to the Deed
• Have both parties sign the deed in the presence of two witnesses and have the witnesses sign the deed to attest to witnessing the signature of the parties
• Check that the parties have signed the Deed in the presence of the witnesses by noting the signatures and the dates of signature in the execution clause of the Deed
• Once the Deed has been executed, have the parties date and keep a copy of the Deed in a secure place
• You will know that you have completed this step when the Deed has been properly executed by the parties in the presence of two witnesses.
• Identify all parties to the Deed and verify that their details are correct.
• Ensure that all parties to the Deed are identified in the document and that the details of each party are accurate and up-to-date.
• Check that the names, addresses and contact details of each party are correct.
• Once you have verified that the parties and their details are correctly identified, you can move on to the next step.
• Check that all parties have signed the Deed in the correct place, and that the date of signature is correct
• Ensure that each party has signed the Deed in the presence of an independent witness
• Check that all parties have signed the Deed with their full name and title, if applicable
• Confirm that the date of signature is correct and that all parties have signed on the same date
• Once you have verified that all parties have correctly signed and dated the Deed, you can proceed to the next step.
• Ensure that the Deed is witnessed by an independent third party who is not a party to the Deed.
• Ask the third party to sign the Deed and provide their name, address, occupation and date of signing.
• Check that the third party has signed and dated the Deed.
• Once the above is complete, you can check this step off your list and move on to the next step.
• Obtain signatures from all parties on the deed of assignment, ensuring that each party signs in the presence of a witness
• Have an independent third party witness each party’s signature
• Ensure that all parties have a valid form of identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, available for inspection by the witness
• Ensure that all parties sign the deed of assignment in the presence of the witness
• Obtain the witness’ signature, confirming that all parties signed in the presence of the witness
• You will know this step is completed once all parties have signed the deed of assignment and the witness has signed confirming they were present during the signing.
• Obtain a copy of the executed Deed of Assignment from all parties
• Contact the relevant state or territory office to determine whether the Deed of Assignment needs to be registered
• If registration is required, complete the necessary forms, pay the registration fee, and submit the required documents
• Once the Deed of Assignment is registered, the registrar will issue a certificate of registration
• Check off this step when you have received and reviewed the certificate of registration.
• Research the applicable laws and regulations in the relevant jurisdiction to decide if the Deed of Assignment needs to be registered
• Consult a legal professional if unsure
• When you have the answer, you can move on to the next step.
• Confirm what type of Deed of Assignment requires registration with the relevant government agency or registry.
• Research the registration procedures and the requirements you must meet in order to register the Deed of Assignment.
• Obtain any fees or additional documents that are necessary to complete the registration process.
• Ensure that all parties to the Deed of Assignment understand the registration process and the requirements for completing it.

You can check off this step once you have researched and confirmed the registration procedures for the Deed of Assignment.

• Gather the necessary documents for registration, such as the Deed of Assignment, supporting documents, and the applicable fee
• Visit the registration office to register the Deed of Assignment
• Submit the necessary documents to the registration office
• Pay the applicable fee
• Obtain a copy of the registered Deed of Assignment
• Upon completion of the above steps, you can check this off your list and move on to the next step.
• Review and understand the nature of the rights and obligations being assigned
• Determine if there are any restrictions or limitations in the assignment
• Assess if any approvals are needed from third parties before the assignment is valid
• Confirm that the assignor has the right to assign the interest being transferred
• Check to see if the assignee has the necessary capacity to accept the assignment
• Analyze if the assignment is subject to any applicable laws or regulations
• Determine if any additional documentation is needed to support the assignment
• Once you have considered all of the above, you can proceed with drafting the Deed of Assignment.
• Check with your local taxation authority or a qualified tax professional to see if the Deed of Assignment is subject to any taxes or stamp duty.
• Ensure that the Deed of Assignment includes any required taxes or stamp duty payments.
• Check to see if the tax or stamp duty implications vary by jurisdiction.
• Once you’ve considered the tax or stamp duty implications, you can move on to the next step.
• Identify any restrictions or limitations that could affect the transfer of rights in the Deed of Assignment
• Consider whether there are any legal restrictions that must be observed in the transfer of the rights being assigned
• Research any relevant industry standards or regulations to ensure that the restrictions or limitations on the rights being assigned are compliant
• Ensure that the Deed of Assignment clearly outlines the restrictions or limitations of the rights being assigned
• When all restrictions or limitations on the rights being assigned are taken into consideration, checked for compliance and outlined in the Deed of Assignment, this step is complete.
• Consider whether the Deed of Assignment needs to be registered with any government or public agencies.
• Determine if any registration is required or optional.
• Research the relevant regulations and laws to ensure that the assignments are properly recorded.
• Check any local requirements or restrictions.
• Once you have determined that the Deed of Assignment does or does not need to be registered, you can move on to the next step in the process.

• Read over the Deed of Assignment twice to make sure you’re accurately identifying all of the parties to the Deed. Make sure you include the full names and addresses of the assignor and assignee, as well as any other relevant parties. • Check that the legal description of the subject property is accurate. • Ensure that the consideration (the amount being exchanged for the assignment) is stated clearly and accurately. • Make sure that the names of the initial parties to the Deed are also included in the recitals. • Ensure that the recitals and the express terms of the Deed are consistent with one another. • Make sure that the Deed is signed, notarized, and delivered in accordance with state law.

Once you’ve completed the above steps, you can check off this task and move on to the next step in the guide.

• Identify the assignor and assignee. The assignor is the party transferring their rights and the assignee is the party receiving the rights.
• Check all of the details are correct. This includes the names, addresses and other contact information for both parties.
• Draft the deed to ensure that the assignor and assignee are accurately identified.
• You can check this off your list and move on to the next step once you have confirmed that the assignor and assignee have been accurately identified in the deed.
• Ensure that all parties to the Deed have read, understood and agreed to the terms and conditions of the agreement.
• Have all parties affix their signature to the Deed and the accompanying documents.
• Check that all the signatures are dated and in the presence of a witness.
• When all parties have properly executed the Deed, you can move on to the next step.
• Ensure all parties have signed the Deed in the presence of a witness.
• The witness must be an independent third party who is not a party to the Deed.
• The witness must sign each page of the Deed that contains a party’s signature.
• The witness must also include their full name, address and occupation on the Deed.
• Once all of the above requirements are met, then you can check this off your list and move on to the next step.
• Determine the applicable taxes or stamp duty implications for the Deed of Assignment.
• Research any applicable taxes or stamp duty fees for the Deed of Assignment.
• Calculate the applicable taxes or stamp duty fees for the Deed of Assignment.
• Make sure to include the applicable taxes or stamp duty fees in the Deed of Assignment.

Once you have determined the applicable taxes or stamp duty implications for the Deed of Assignment, and included them in the Deed of Assignment, you can move on to the next step.

• Determine the rights that you are assigning and review any applicable laws or regulations to ensure that the assignment of such rights is permitted.
• Consider any applicable contractual restrictions or limitations on the rights being assigned, such as any applicable confidentiality obligations or restrictions on the transfer of rights.
• Once you have determined that the assignment of the rights is permitted and there are no applicable restrictions or limitations, you can proceed to the next step of recording keeping.
• Create a record of the Deed of Assignment, including the date it was executed, by each party
• Maintain a copy of the Deed of Assignment in a secure place
• Record any additional related documents, such as any security documents, release documents, or other agreements
• When all of the above have been done, you can check this off your list and move on to the next step.
• Obtain a physical copy of the original Deed of Assignment
• Ensure the original Deed is signed by both parties
• Keep the original Deed in a safe and secure place, such as a locked filing cabinet or safe
• Make sure the document is stored in a location that is accessible to both parties
• Ensure that the original Deed is not destroyed or tampered with in any way

You can check this off your list and move on to the next step once the original Deed of Assignment is safely stored in a secure location.

• Scan or take a digital photo of the original Deed of Assignment and save it to a secure location.
• Ensure that the digital copy is readable and clearly displays all of the information contained in the original document.
• Ensure that the digital copy is stored in a secure location, preferably on a cloud-based storage system or other secure server.
• Make sure that only authorized personnel have access to the digital copy of the Deed.
• When finished, you will have created a digital copy of the Deed and stored it in a secure manner.
• Read over the Deed of Assignment to ensure accuracy
• Make sure all details are correct, and all parties are named
• Verify that all signatures are complete and accurate
• Make sure the date of the assignment is correct
• Check that the document is formatted and laid out correctly
• Once you are satisfied with the accuracy of the Deed of Assignment, you can move on to the next step.
• Read through the entire document to make sure all the information is correct
• Double check that the names and details of the parties involved are spelled correctly
• Ensure that all the dates are accurate, and that any and all parties have signed the deed in the right places
• Check that the terms and conditions in the deed are consistent with the agreement between the parties
• When you have verified all the details, you can check this off your list and move on to the next step.
• Check the Deed of Assignment to ensure that all required elements are present, including accurate information and signatures of all parties.
• Verify that any and all attachments to the Deed of Assignment are included and accurate.
• Ensure that all dates, signatures, and other pieces of information are accurate and up-to-date.
• Once you’ve confirmed that all of the steps have been completed correctly, you can move on to the next step.
• Seek professional advice from a lawyer or other legal professional to ensure that the deed of assignment is legally binding and enforceable.
• Request that the legal professional checks that all steps have been completed correctly, and that the deed of assignment meets all requirements under local law.
• Ask the legal professional to provide you with written advice on any changes or revisions that may be necessary to make the deed of assignment valid and enforceable.
• Once the legal professional has confirmed that the deed is legally sound, you can check off this step and proceed with the next one.
• Research legal professionals who are able to provide advice and assistance with the drafting of a deed of assignment
• Contact the legal professionals to discuss the specific requirements and details of the deed of assignment
• Ask the legal professionals if they are able to provide advice and assistance with the deed of assignment
• Receive advice from the legal professionals and make changes to the deed of assignment accordingly
• Once you are satisfied with the changes to the deed of assignment, you can move on to the next step.

Q: Does a Deed of Assignment need to be signed?

Asked by John on April 23rd 2022. A: Yes, a Deed of Assignment needs to be signed by both the assignor and the assignee in order for it to be legally binding. The signatures should be witnessed and dated, and should be in front of an independent witness who is not related to either party. It is also important to include the relevant clauses and provisions in the deed, as these will set out the rights and obligations of each party.

Q: What is the difference between an assignment and a novation?

Asked by Sarah on July 29th 2022. A: An assignment is a transfer of rights or obligations from one party to another, while a novation is a transfer of rights or obligations from one party to another with the consent of all parties involved. An assignment does not necessarily require the consent of all parties, while a novation always requires the consent of all parties. Additionally, an assignment can transfer rights or obligations without necessarily extinguishing any pre-existing agreements, while a novation extinguishes any pre-existing agreements.

Q: Is a Deed of Assignment legally binding in different jurisdictions?

Asked by Tyler on October 17th 2022. A: Yes, a Deed of Assignment can be legally binding in different jurisdictions, though the exact requirements for validity may differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. In general, however, a Deed of Assignment needs to be signed by both parties and witnessed by an independent third party in order for it to be legally binding. Additionally, the deed should include all relevant clauses and provisions that are applicable in each jurisdiction.

Q: Are there any tax implications when drafting a Deed of Assignment?

Asked by Emma on January 15th 2022. A: Yes, there are tax implications that need to be taken into account when drafting a Deed of Assignment. Depending on the jurisdiction and specific tax laws, there may be tax implications for both parties if they are transferring rights or obligations under the deed. It is important to seek professional tax advice before entering into any agreement that involves transferring rights or obligations between parties as this could have significant financial implications for all involved.

Q: Do I need legal advice when drafting a Deed of Assignment?

Asked by Jacob on June 5th 2022. A: While it is not necessary to seek legal advice when drafting a Deed of Assignment, it is generally recommended in order to ensure that all relevant legal requirements are satisfied and that all involved parties are aware of their rights and obligations under the deed. It is also important to make sure that all language used in the deed is clear and unambiguous so that it can easily be understood by all parties involved.

Q: How can I ensure that my Deed of Assignment is valid?

Asked by Michael on August 28th 2022. A: In order for your Deed of Assignment to be valid, it must meet certain legal requirements which vary between jurisdictions. Generally speaking, your deed should include all relevant clauses and provisions applicable in your jurisdiction as well as signatures from both parties which should be witnessed by an independent third party who is not related to either party involved. Additionally, any language used within the document should be clear and unambiguous so that it can easily be understood by all involved parties.

Q: What information do I need to provide when drafting a Deed of Assignment?

Asked by Ashley on November 10th 2022. A: When drafting a Deed of Assignment, you will need to provide information about both parties involved such as their names, addresses, contact details and any other relevant information required under applicable laws in your jurisdiction. Additionally, you will need to include any relevant clauses or provisions applicable in your jurisdiction which will set out the rights and obligations of each party under the deed as well as any other information required for the document to be legally binding.

Q: What are common mistakes made when drafting a Deed of Assignment?

Asked by Joshua on February 20th 2022. A: One common mistake made when drafting a Deed of Assignment is failing to include all relevant clauses or provisions applicable in your jurisdiction which set out the rights and obligations of each party involved in the agreement. Additionally, failing to have the document signed by both parties or witnessed by an independent third party can render the document invalid or unenforceable under applicable law in some jurisdictions. Moreover, using ambiguous language within the document can also lead to misunderstandings and disputes further down the line which could be avoided if clear language was used throughout the document instead.

Example dispute

Lawsuit referencing a deed of assignment.

• The plaintiff may raise a lawsuit if they have been wronged by the defendant in a way that is outlined in the deed of assignment.
• For example, the deed of assignment may outline that the defendant is responsible for paying a certain amount of money to the plaintiff, and the defendant has failed to do so.
• The plaintiff may also raise a lawsuit if the defendant has failed to adhere to any other obligations laid out in the deed of assignment.
• The plaintiff would need to prove that the defendant has breached the deed of assignment in order to win the lawsuit.
• If successful, the plaintiff may be able to obtain a judgment in their favor, which may require the defendant to pay the plaintiff the money they are owed.
• In addition, the plaintiff may be able to seek other damages, such as punitive damages, if the breach of the deed of assignment was particularly egregious.
• Depending on the severity of the breach, the plaintiff may also be able to seek an injunction to prevent the defendant from continuing to breach the deed of assignment.
• Settlement of the dispute may also be possible, wherein the defendant agrees to pay a certain amount of money to the plaintiff, or agrees to adhere to the obligations laid out in the deed of assignment.

Templates available (free to use)

Deed Of Assignment For Rent Deposits Occupation Lease Deed Of Assignment Of Benefit Of Claim For The Freehold Or Extended Lease House Under Section 8 Or Section 14 Deed Of Assignment Of Equitable Interest In Residential Land Deed Of Assignment Of Goodwill And Intellectual Property Rights Transfer Of A General Partnership To An Llp Deed Of Assignment Of Property Sale Benefits [Section 42 Deed Of A

Helpful? Want to know more? Message me on Linkedin

Links to get you started

‍ Our Legal AI Assistant (free while in beta) Contract Template Library Legal Clause Library

Try the world's most advanced AI Legal Assistant, today

• Publications
• Mortgage Claims by Assignee Mortgagees: Evidencing the Right to the Mortgagee’s Remedies

Mortgage Claims by Assignee Mortgagees: Evidencing the Right to the Mortgagee’s Remedies 02 September 2020

It has long been a known problem in mortgage law that s.114 of the Law of Property Act 1925, which automatically transfers the right to the mortgage debt when the mortgage is transferred by deed, does not apply to registered land. That has been clear since at least Paragon Finance Plc v Pender [2005] EWCA Civ 760 by reference to the Land Registration Act 1925. Thus, for registered land, the debt must be assigned separately . Pender, however, also makes clear that the registered proprietor of a legal charge has the right to possession, even if no right to the debt.

Despite these long-standing principles, mortgage cases brought by an assignee of the mortgage often face defences that they  are not  entitled to the relief they have sought. One solution, to produce the deed of assignment, can raise issues about redaction of non-relevant parts, when one deed transfers many mortgages.

Two recent cases discuss these issues. On procedure, the court has considered the more general question of when a party can redact parts of a document which the court is asked to construe on the basis that such parts are irrelevant. On substantive law, the courts have recently considered which documents are necessary to evidence an assignment of a debt secured by mortgage. In this paper, we consider issues of evidence in light of those cases and discuss the practical implications for practitioners, particularly in the context of mortgages.

Production of Documentary Evidence

The first part of this paper looks at redaction of documents in the context of disclosure.

Standard disclosure, under CPR 31, that is the production of documents on which a party relies or which may adversely affect or support a parties case, is an intrinsic part of the way civil ligation operates. Trials are not to be conducted by ambush thus each party must have an adequate opportunity to deal with the other side’s evidence fairly. That said, there are a number of rules of both law and procedure which can operate to prevent the production of relevant documents in a given case; litigation privilege is one obvious example. But what about the redaction of documents adduced as evidence by one party on the ground of confidentiality or irrelevance?

The practice of blanking out parts of documents is not a new one. Practitioners have routinely done so where part of the document is privileged or contains what they consider to be irrelevant material. In  GE Capital v Bankers Trust  [1995] 1 W.L.R. 172, CA, just before the introduction of the Civil Procedure Rules, Hoffmann LJ said:

“It has long been the practice that a party is entitled to seal up or cover up parts of a document which he claims to be irrelevant … In my view, the test for whether on discovery part of a document can be withheld on grounds of irrelevance is simply whether that part is irrelevant. The test for whether part can be withheld on grounds of privilege is simply whether that part is privileged. There is no additional requirement that the part must deal with an entirely different subject-matter from the rest.”

Redaction within the CPR has been discussed in the more recent case of Atos Consulting v Avis Plc [2007] EWHC 323 (TCC). In that case, Ramsey J gave guidance as to the correct judicial approach to be taken where the documents disclosed by one party were redacted and another party, by application, sought to challenge the redactions, either on the ground of lack of privilege or on the ground that the redacted text was relevant. At 37 the following 5 helpful principles as to redaction were outlined:

“(1)  The Court has to consider the evidence produced on the application.

(2)  If the Court is satisfied that the right to withhold inspection of a document is established by the evidence and there are no sufficient grounds for challenging the correctness of that asserted right, the Court will uphold the right.

(3)  If the Court is not satisfied that the right to withhold inspection is established because, for instance, the evidence does not establish a legal right to withhold inspection then the Court will order inspection of the documents.

(4)  If sufficient grounds are shown for challenging the correctness of the asserted right then the Court may order further evidence to be produced on oath or, if there is no other appropriate method of properly deciding whether the right to withhold inspection should be upheld, it may decide to inspect the documents.

(5)  If it decides to inspect then having inspected the documents it may invite representations.”

There is, however, a distinction between application to redaction of the rules which apply when a party is giving disclosure of documents in the ordinary course of litigation, and the separate question of the relevance of redaction in the process of construction of a document which a court has to embark upon when considering the meaning or legal effect of a document. Since the process of construction requires the document as a whole to be considered, the starting point must always be that the entire document should be made available to the court, and any redactions to it on grounds of irrelevance should either be forbidden or, if permitted at all, convincingly justified and kept to an absolute minimum. This situation, where the redacted document needs to be construed, is the precise issue raised in the recent Court of Appeal decision of Hancock v Promontoria (Chestnut) Ltd [2020] EWCA Civ 907.

Hancock v Promontoria (Chestnut) Ltd [2020] EWCA Civ 907

In Hancock, Promontoria Chestnut sought to recover the payment of an undisputed debt of approximately £4.09 million by serving a statutory demand. The debt represented the unsecured balance due under loans originally made to Mr Hancock by Clydesdale Bank PLC. Promontoria Chestnut claimed to have acquired title to the loans by assignment, and in the Statutory Demand, Promontoria Chestnut claimed to be entitled to all of the Bank’s rights by virtue of a deed of assignment.

Proceedings were brought by Mr Hancock to set aside the statutory demand. In them, Mr Hancock sought to challenge Promontoria Chestnut’s title to the debts on the basis that the copy of the Deed of Assignment, which Promontoria Chestnut had put in evidence, had been redacted heavily. Promontoria Chestnut’s solicitor had produced a witness statement explaining the reasons for the redactions, pointing in the main to the irrelevance of the materials redacted to the issue to be determined. However, Mr Hancock argued that the redacted deed of assignment was insufficient to prove Promontoria Chestnut’s title and its corresponding status as a lawful assignee. He said that part of the redactions related to the very clauses which the court was required to construe.

Notwithstanding the arguments of principle advanced, Mr Hancock was unable to produce any credible evidence casting doubt on the title of Promontoria Chestnut to the debts. The Court highlighted the fact that this was not a case where Promontoria Chestnut was required to prove its title to sue Mr Hancock and viewed in context, the redactions to the deed of assignment faded into relative insignificance. It was held that the unredacted parts of the deed were sufficient to show that title to Mr Hancock’s debts indeed had been assigned by the Bank to Promontoria Chestnut.

However, in reaching its decision the Court of Appeal considered the scope of the law on this issue of redaction more generally and the basis on which a party to proceedings could rely on redacted documents.

When Can Redacted Documents be Relied On?

It is settled law that a written contract has to be construed as a whole, in the light of admissible evidence of the relevant background facts (or surrounding circumstances) known to both parties at or before the time when the contract was made, but excluding evidence of prior negotiations. In Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd [2017] UKSC 24, [2017] AC 1173, per Lord Hodge JSC (with whose judgment the other members of the Supreme Court agreed) at [10], it was said:

“The court’s task is to ascertain the objective meaning of the language which the parties have chosen to express their agreement. It has long been accepted that this is not a literalist exercise focused solely on a parsing of the wording of the particular clause but that the court must consider the contract as a whole and, depending on the nature, formality and quality of drafting of the contract, give more or less weight to elements of the wider context in reaching its view as to that objective meaning.”

How can such a task can be properly undertaken by the court where part of the document has been redacted so that the court does not have before it the entirety of the relevant contract? Construction of a written document is a matter of law for the court, and questions of relevance require an evaluative judgment which it is for the court, not the solicitor of one of the parties, to perform. Thus, in Hancock , Mr Hancock argued that as a matter of principle, it was no answer to an objection to production of a redacted document only to say that the redactions were certified by an experienced solicitor as being irrelevant to the question which the court has to decide.

However, Mr Hancock’s submission that the court should simply refuse to engage with the construction of the deed of assignment in its redacted form because it is not in a position to construe it as a whole went too far. There could be no such rigid rule which admitted no exceptions. For example, there can be no reasonable objection to redaction, on the grounds of irrelevance, of the details of third party loan assets and title numbers in the schedule to the deed of assignment or the personal details of signatories and/or attesting witnesses. Those details were unlikely to have any bearing on the construction of the operative clauses of the Deed, particularly, in relation to the personal details of signatories and witnesses, where there was no issue in the case concerning its due execution.

However, even in such a clear case  a clear explanation must be provided of the nature and extent of the omissions, and the reasons for making them. Where it was obvious that the provisions in question would on any reasonable view be completely irrelevant to the issue of construction, and if the reasons for taking that view can be clearly and fully articulated by a solicitor acting for the party seeking the redaction, the court will be more inclined to accept that the redaction may be defensible.

In Hancock , it was held that, in general, irrelevance alone cannot be a proper ground for redaction of part of a document which the court is asked to construe, and there must be some additional feature, such as protection of privacy or confidentiality, relied upon to justify the redaction.

Conversely, however, it is seldom, if ever, that it would be appropriate for one party unilaterally to redact provisions in a contractual document which the court is being asked to construe, merely on grounds of confidentiality, where there is no irrelevance in the text redacted. Confidentiality alone cannot be a good reason for redacting an otherwise relevant provision in a contractual document which the court has to construe, and where there are other ways in which problems of that nature can be addressed, by allowing the unredacted document to be available to a ‘confidentiality ring’: the court and a limited number of the parties’ lawyers for example.

Thus, where a redacted document is to be construed, redactions, to be defensible, must be on the grounds of irrelevance and privacy, or irrelevance and confidentiality, not on one of irrelevance, privacy, or confidentiality alone.

The Emmanuel Decision

Just prior to the Court of Appeal decision in Hancock , the High Court (Marcus Smith J) had considered the issue of a redacted assignment of a mortgage in Promontoria (Oak) Limited v Nicholas Michael Emanuel and Nicola Jane Emanuel [2020] EWHC 104 (Ch) (“ Emanuel I ”) but in the different situation of the assignee mortgagee’s claim.

This case involved another company within the Promontoria group, Promontoria (Oak) Limited. Promontoria Oak brought possession proceedings against the defendants, Mr and Mrs Emanuel, owners of residential property in Cornwall charged as security for business loans to Clydesdale Bank. Promontoria sought possession and a money judgment as the assignee of the Bank, relying on a deed of assignment as evidence of the same.

Similar to the position in the Hancock case, in Emanuel, Promontoria put in evidence a significantly redacted version of the assignment, alleging that the redactions contained commercially sensitive material which had no bearing upon the existence and effectiveness of the assignment. Again as in the Hancock case, written notice of the assignment had been given to the Emanuels.

At first instance it was held that Promontoria Oak was entitled to possession of the property and a money judgment was given. The judge at first instance had made his decision with only a redacted version of the deed of assignment, plus some additional evidence, before him. This decision was appealed by the Emanuels on various grounds, including, as ground 1, that, as a matter of evidential rules, the judge had been wrong in exercising his discretion to admit the redacted version of the assignment into evidence. He could not be satisfied, as he had to be to allow the redacted version to be admitted, that the redacted passages were of confidential and irrelevant material because he could not be satisfied on the evidence that they were irrelevant.

This first ground of appeal was successful. The judge at first instance was wrong to admit the redacted assignment deed into evidence. He had failed to have regard to the implications of the evidence that was not before him, and ought to have seen the unredacted assignment. Marcus Smith J said that there was a significant probative difference between the primary evidence that was not before the court and the secondary evidence that was before the court. Even if the judge could conclude on the adduced evidence that the debt had been assigned, it did not follow that evidence not adduced, for example the redacted material, was irrelevant. The evidence not adduced could undermine the conclusion based on the adduced evidence. The judge had failed to pay proper regard to this important factor. 

This was in the context of some uncertainty in the correspondence with the Emanuels as to who, of various Promontoria entities, the assignee for this mortgage was to be. What was said in the correspondence did not sit easily with what the redacted assignment deed showed, and it was unclear that Promontoria Oak had had the mortgage assigned to it via a chain of assignments through the Promontoria entities. In saying that no other documents were needed to prove Promontoria Oaks title to commence proceedings he was simply wrong. He was thus wrong to conclude that the redacted material was irrelevant, and thus wrong to conclude that there was sufficient justification for redaction to allow the redacted assignment to be admitted into evidence. Promontoria Oak had not thus done enough to prove its claim.

What did the Court of Appeal in Hancock make of this earlier decision about redaction in Emanuel I? Since there was a pending application for permission to appeal in Emanuel I, it limited its comments. It did however make three observations.

First, it was noted that the High Court in Emanuel I had rejected grounds 2 and 3, that the redacted deed if admitted into evidence was not enough to prove Promontoria Oak’s title. Marcus Smith J concluded in Emnauel I  that the trial judge had clearly been entitled, on the redacted assignment adduced before him, to reach the conclusion that the mortgage and debt had been assigned to Promontoria Oak. Nevertheless, the appeal succeeded on ground 1, that there should have been no admission of the redacted assignment into evidence, as the trial judge’s decision to permit Promontoria Oak to rely on the redacted deed “was so flawed that it must be set aside”.

Secondly, there are significant differences between the facts in the Emanuel case and that of Hancock. Promontoria Oak had to establish its title to sue, as the claimant in Part 55 proceedings for possession and a money judgment. By contrast, Mr Hancock was seeking to set aside a statutory demand, and the burden was on him to show the existence of a substantial dispute. In addition, in Emanuel I, unlike in Hancock , there was little evidence from Promontoria Oak’s solicitors to explain the commercial background to the assignment, reasons for the redactions, and informing the court that he had inspected an unredacted version of the assignment so as to verify it’s irrelevance to the issues in dispute as there was in Hancock.

Finally, the parties to the litigation and the assignment relied upon in the two cases were of course different, though the Court of Appeal in Hancock noted that the redactions appeared to be rather similar.

In light of these key differences, the outcome of any Emmanuel I appeal is far from a forgone conclusion. Indeed the tone of the Court of Appeal’s commentary in Hancock does not suggest that those particular Justices of Appeal at least agreed with Marcus Smith J. It appears that they might happily have concluded that it was enough that the redacted assignment proved Promontoria Oak’s title. That does seem a likely more practical outcome. The Emanuels’ appeals do appear likely to be simply a delaying tactic.

Evidencing Assignment

A further aspect of the Hancock case related to the effect in law of the notice of the assignment from the Bank to Promontoria Chestnut, given to Mr Hancock. Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925 (“ LPA 1925 ”) provides that an absolute assignment by writing of any debt or thing in action, of which express notice in writing is given to the debtor, is effectual in law to pass and transfer the legal right to the debt, all legal and other remedies and the power to give a good discharge without the concurrence of the assignor.

Thus, in Hancock , if the deed of assignment did assign the benefit of Mr Hancock’s debts to the Bank to Promontoria Chestnut, then the giving of express written notice of that assignment to Mr Hancock would transfer the legal title to the debts, together with all remedies for them. There was no evidence in that case that the Bank had ever disputed the validity of the assignment to Promontoria Chestnut or that Mr Hancock had ever asked the Bank to confirm that it no longer had any claims against him in respect of the debts. Mr Hancock would be fully protected by section 136 if he were to make payment to Promontoria Chestnut because the effect of s.136 was to prevent the Bank making a separate claim for the debt. Because of s.136, Promontoria Chestnut could give good receipt for any payments of his debt that Mr Hancock made. In the context of his application to set aside Promontoria Chestnut’s statutory demand, Mr Hancock’s assertion that the debt was disputed on substantial grounds had a correspondingly hollow ring.

The operation of s.136 LPA 1925, and the contrast of its role in assignment of a debt to the role of registration of an assignment of a charge in passing a mortgagee’s proprietary rights, has also been given recent consideration by the High Court in yet another piece of Promontoria litigation, Promontoria (Oak) Limited v Nicholas Michael Emanuel and Nicola Jane Emanuel [2020] EWHC 563 (Ch) (“ Emanuel II ”).

In a hearing of the order to be made given the Emmanuel I decision, Promontoria Oak successfully argued that the first instance orders for possession and a money judgment should be upheld, despite its inability to rely on the redacted deed of assignment, but on the alternative ground that it had title to sue and recover possession in its capacity as registered proprietor of the legal charge granted by the Emanuels over their property.

Marcus Smith J agreed. He held that as the registered proprietor of charge on property, Promontoria Oak had title and therefore standing to claim possession. The claim based on the proprietary interest succeeded simply because of the company's registration of its assigned mortgage pursuant to the Land Registration Act 2002 (“ LRA 2002 ”). This is simply the Paragon Finance Plc v Pender [2005] EWCA Civ 760 point: the right to possession goes with registration of the legal owner of a legal charge.

What about the money claim? Under s.114 LPA 1925 a deed purporting to transfer a mortgage carries with it a right to sue for the mortgage money or any unpaid part of it. Yet s.114 does not apply to registered land. One must thus make a distinction between the remedies of an assignee of a mortgagee’s rights in its guise as registered proprietor, and reliance on the deed of assignment. Thus Promontoria Oak could not rely on the deed of assignment and s.136 LPA 1925 because there was no evidence as to the deed in evidence before the court. However it could succeed on its possession claim as registered proprietor of the charge over the Emanuels’ land.

Moreover, Marcus Smith J concluded, though without much detail in reasoning, that ‘by analogy with section 114’ and pursuant to s.51 LRA 2002, Promontoria Oak had a right to claim any outstanding debt as the holder of the proprietary interest, even though it could not rely on the deed of assignment to show assignment of the right to the debt. This appears to be a strengthening of the position. Post Paragon Finance it appeared that the debt had to be assigned separately in cases of registered land if a money claim was to succeed. Nevertheless the minimal reasoning on this issue in Emanuel II should be noted. Marcus Smith J made reference to s.51 LR 2002. However, unlike s.114 LPA 1925, s.51 LRA 2002 does not explicitly refer to the transfer of the right to sue.

This judgment in Emanuel II , however, is also subject to an outstanding application for permission to appeal. If permission is given, it will be useful to see what the Court of Appeal makes of the long vexed question of assignment of the mortgage debt and whether it is a result of registeration as legal owner of a mortgage despite the lack of application of the useful machinery of s.114 of the 1925 Act. If there is no equivalent of s.114, then the registered proprietor of a mortgage, who took as assignee of the charge, can require the debt secured, plus interest and costs, to be paid to it as a condition of redemption, since that is inherent in a mortgage. Yet that assignee may have to account to the original lender, and, subject to the decision in Emanuel II , may not be able to sue for the debt. An odd position.

Pending any such appeal, Emanuel II is a useful case outlining the law under the 2002 Act and what registration as proprietor of a charge necessarily carries with it. The result of the findings made by the court was that Promontoria Oak effectively sidestepped the issues concerning its redacted documents and achieved its aims via a different route.

The Practicalities

What evidence to adduce?

When a assignee of a mortgage is claiming possession, or the other clear proprietary remedies, sale or the appointment of a receiver, it need only plead its registered title to the charge and that is sufficient to establish its right. That has long been the case, since the decision in Paragon Finance v Pender . That is so even if its registration is a mistake, unless and until that registration is unwound by a claim for rectification of the Land Register.

What if a claim for a money judgment is sought? Though the common current practice is always to seek a money judgment with a possession claim, since the registered mortgagee is entitled to the debt, interest and costs, out of the proceeds of its sale, a money judgment might only be needed if a shortfall is feared, or clarity as to what is owed is sought before sale.

However, if a money judgment is sought, at present at least, pending any appeal of Emanuel II , registration as mortgagee it appears should suffice. By s.51 of the LRA 2002, any assignee once registered is entitled to make a claim for the debt.

When to redact?

What if an assignment of a mortgage is to be produced, for example if the mortgage is not registered, or if the Emanuel II decision is overturned? What should practice be on redaction?

Where documents are redacted it is important for the other side to be able to understand the basis for it, and for the disclosing party to provide an explanation. A witness statement ought to be produced explaining the background to the redacted document, reasons for the redactions and informing the court that the complete version had inspected so as to verify it’s irrelevance to the issues in dispute. It should be prepared in quite some detail, and redactions kept to a minimum. Thus, for example, in Hancock the redactions were said to be far more extensive than needed and the evidence provided by Promontoria Chestnut’s solicitor would have been of greater assistance to the court if he had condescended to greater detail about the specific reasons for particular redactions.

As for the redactions themselves, where part of a document is irrelevant but not confidential, then it might be simpler to disclose it in its entirety. Where the issue is one of confidentiality however, then the issue of redaction arises. If the document can be separated into distinct parts, where one is confidential and the other isn’t, it may be a straightforward process. For example, if a document attaches board minutes or a schedule of third-party transactions which are irrelevant to the litigation.

In some cases there will be real issues about the admissibility of a redacted version. In such cases, another approach will be needed, for example the use of a confidentiality ring within which the document could be made available in its unredacted form to the court and/or a limited number of lawyers on each side may offer a practical solution. Another approach might be for the parties to agree for the judge alone to see the document in its unredacted form.

Cecily Crampin

Tricia hemans.

2 September 2020

• Press Comments
• International Work
• Our Practice
• Practice Areas

• Client Privacy Notice
• Employment Applicant Privacy Notice
• Equality And Diversity Statistics
• Mini-Pupillage Privacy Notice
• Provision of Services Regulations 2009
• Pupillage Privacy Notice
• Tenancy Application Privacy Notice
• Terms of business
• Internal Login

Barristers regulated by The Bar Standards Board © 2024 Falcon Chambers Site by Sears Davies   FalconChambers1

• Business Set Up
• Data & Privacy
• Getting Funding
• Intellectual Property
• Employment Law
• Technology and Software
• Professional Services
• Construction & Trades
• Fitness, Health and Wellness
• Online Business
• Food & Hospitality
• Meet the Team
• Quick Q&As
• Get Started
• Member Login

What Is A Deed of Assignment, Anyway?

In any business, contracts will be everywhere you go — from your customers to suppliers, contractors, employees, graphic designers and even your monthly subscriptions!

However, contracts generally are signed between two parties.

So, what happens if one party wants to transfer or assign their rights and obligations under a contract to another party ?

This is where a Deed of Assignment comes in.

What Is A Deed?

In the legal world, there are two main types of legal documents: agreements and deeds.

Agreements are generally the most common contracts you’ll see. However, deeds work a little differently.

Put simply, a deed needs to be physically signed and witnessed in person. This means that it’s difficult to sign deeds with international parties.

So, it’s important to understand that a deed has specific requirements for execution.

What Is A Deed of Assignment (Contract Assignment)?

A Deed of Assignment is a legal document that transfers or assigns the legal rights and obligations to another party.

And it varies depending on your situation.

For example, an assignment could work for simple things like intellectual property. When a graphic designer creates a logo for you, you might want to make sure that logo is owned by you. In this case, the graphic designer would “assign” that copyright to you.

Or, if you’re selling your business, you might want to transfer your contractual relationships to whoever is purchasing your business. 

For example, if you have existing contracts with suppliers to your cafe business, you might look at transferring these to the buyer. Here, you’d sign a Deed of Assignment to transfer the rights and obligations of that contract to the new owner of your business.

A Deed of Assignment makes sure that you no longer have continuing obligations and rights as a signatory to that contract . The last thing you want is to be liable or accountable for a contract you forgot to assign to someone.

When Can A Contract Be Signed As A Deed?

We mentioned above that a deed is essentially a legal document – so how is this different to a standard contract?

A contract can be signed as a deed if the parties agree that no consideration will be required.

Since it is a slightly more formal document, it follows a specific process of execution. To execute a deed, a witness is required (and, in some cases, a seal).

If you need help putting together a Deed of Assignment, let’s chat!

You can reach out to our friendly team at [email protected] for a free, no-obligations consultation about your specific situation and the legal documents that are right for you.

Sprintlaw's expert lawyers make legal services affordable and accessible for business owners. We're an award-winning, online law firm for small businesses in the UK.

We'll get back to you within 1 business day.

• Full Name *
• Email Address *
• What are you looking for help with? *
• Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Related Services

Ip assignment deed, deed of novation, deed of variation, deed of settlement, deed of termination.

• Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Download our Top 3 Legal Mistakes guide.

Keep your business in the loop with the latest legal updates.

Book in a free consultation with us to discuss your legal needs.

You're visiting Sprintlaw . Would you like to switch to Sprintlaw ?

• Business Sales
• Commercial Leases
• Construction
• Consumer Law
• Creative & Entertainment
• Digital Marketing & Advertising
• Franchising
• Not-for-profits & Charities
• Regulatory Compliance
• Software & IT
• Accountants
• Agribusiness
• Beauty Industry
• Clothing Business
• Consulting and Professional Services
• Creative Industries
• Education and Training
• Event Planning & Management
• Fitness and Wellness Industry
• Furniture & Homeware
• Hairdressing Business
• Healthcare and Medical Practices
• Hospitality and Tourism
• Instagram Business
• Legal Services
• Logistics and Transportation
• Marketing Business
• Party Business
• Restaurant and Cafés
• SaaS Business
• Sports & Recreation
• Technology and Software Development
• Travel Agencies and Tour Operators
• Creative & Entertainment
• Data & Privacy
• Digital Marketing & Advertising
• Getting Finance
• Health & Beauty
• Not-for-profits & Charities
• Software & IT
• Getting Started With Your Legals
• Business Ideas and Plans
• Business Structure
• Business Partners
• Industry Regulations
• Building a Team: Employees and Contractors
• Online Business and Privacy

Understanding a deed of assignment for intellectual property

A deed of transfer is used to change the ownership of intellectual property, a common occurrence in business. Explore how and when to use one.

Find out more about intellectual property basics

by   Brette Sember, J.D.

Brette is a former attorney and has been a writer and editor for more than 25 years. She is the author of more than 4...

Read more...

Updated on: November 24, 2023 · 3 min read

Understanding intellectual property in business

How to transfer intellectual property rights in business, what to include in a deed of assignment, registering new ownership, restrictions on intellectual property transfers.

Most companies have intellectual property as part of their assets, including software, product design, or copyright to white papers. Buying or selling such property is done using a document called a deed of assignment.

A large part of what a business consists of may be tied to intellectual property . It's easy to see physical property a company owns, such as a building, office furniture, or inventory, but intellectual property can be more challenging to identify.

Most businesses have intellectual property, or works created by human minds or, in some cases, by computers. Some examples of intellectual property include architectural drawings, ad campaigns, company or product names, inventions, and source code.

Examples of when transfers of intellectual property might happen include when a company is buying another company, when you are setting up an LLC and want to transfer your intellectual property into the company, or when a business buys product rights from another company or individual.

A deed of assignment can be done in one transaction, instead of one transaction for each item of intellectual property, by transferring all ownership rights of all intellectual property detailed in the deed. The document is signed by both the buyer and seller. No payment is required for it to be valid.

A deed of assignment must be in writing and should include:

• The names and addresses of the assignor and assignee
• A description of the program or product for which the rights are being transferred
• A statement that all intellectual property rights to the property are being transferred
• Signatures of the parties and the date of the agreement execution

The deed could also include the following sections, where applicable:

• Consideration, or payment, to be made to the original owner.
• Warranties, or promises that the intellectual property rights being assigned don't infringe on anyone else's intellectual property rights . For example, in a deed regarding the transfer of a copyright, this section could state that the copyrighted work is original and not owned by someone else.
• Indemnification, or promise by the seller to reimburse the assignee if there is some problem with title to the property.
• Future assignments. For example, the agreement could be ongoing, so that anything the assignor creates in the future for this product or program is also transferred to the buyer.

Although a deed of assignment transfers ownership in intellectual property , it does not change the registration of the ownership. The assignee is responsible for handling all registration requirements.

For example, if a patent is transferred via a deed of assignment, the new owner must record the change in ownership with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Similarly, the transfer of a copyright is recorded with the U.S. Copyright Office.

Transfers of intellectual property must comply with U.S. laws. One obvious caveat is that you can't transfer property you don't own. Transfers must also comply with antitrust laws, which are set up to prevent one company from completely dominating an industry.

If intellectual property rights are being transferred overseas, the transfer must comply with Export Administration Regulations and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations , which are designed to protect national security and trade.

The deed of assignment can be a crucial part of a business deal or transaction. You can create a deed of assignment yourself, or you can work with an attorney .

You may also like

How to Write a Will: A Comprehensive Guide to Will Writing

Writing a will is one of the most important things you can do for yourself and for your loved ones, and it can be done in just minutes. Are you ready to get started?

July 21, 2024 · 11min read

What Is a Power of Attorney (POA)? A Comprehensive Guide

A power of attorney can give trusted individuals the power to make decisions on your behalf—but only in certain situations.

August 29, 2024 · 20min read