literature review on insurance industry

A systematic literature review on sustainability issues along the value chain in insurance companies and pension funds

• Survey Paper
• Open access
• Published: 10 May 2023
• Volume 13 , pages 653–701, ( 2023 )

Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

• Laura Iveth Aburto Barrera 1 &
• Joël Wagner   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3712-5494 1 , 2  

4910 Accesses

6 Citations

Explore all metrics

Sustainability is now a priority issue that governments, businesses and society in general must address in the short term. In their role as major global institutional investors and risk managers, insurance companies and pension funds are strategic players in building socio-economic and sustainable development. To gain a comprehensive understanding of the current state of action and research on environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors in the insurance and pension sectors, we conduct a systematic literature review. We rely on the PRISMA protocol and analyze 1 731 academic publications available in the Web of Science database up to the year 2022 and refer to 23 studies outside of scientific research retrieved from the websites of key international and European organizations. To study the corpus of literature, we introduce a classification framework along the insurance value chain including external stakeholders. The main findings reveal that risk, underwriting and investment management are the most researched areas among the nine categories considered in our framework, while claims management and sales tend to be neglected. Regarding ESG factors, climate change, as part of the environmental factor, has received the most attention in the literature. After reviewing the literature, we summarize the main sustainability issues and potential related actions. Given the current nature of the sustainability challenges for the insurance sector, this literature review is relevant to academics and practitioners alike.

Similar content being viewed by others

Sustainability risks & opportunities in the insurance industry

Sustainable insurance assessment: towards an integrative model.

Analyzing the Links Between Financial Markets’ ESG Risk Assessment Process and Corporate Sustainability

Explore related subjects.

• Artificial Intelligence

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

1 Introduction

Climate change, social inequality, and corporate governance are some of the biggest challenges facing society today. These concerns are part of what is known as the environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors, which shed light on the obligations of companies and governments to the community in building a sustainable economy. In addition, and as original motivation, ESG factors are important to insurance companies and pension funds when assessing the associated financial risks and opportunities in their firms. As an illustration of the alarming state on the environmental front, the latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, see [ 67 ]) has revealed that “there is at least a 50 percent probability that global warming will reach or exceed 1.5  \(^{\circ }\) C in the short term, even under the very low greenhouse gas emissions scenario, requiring immediate action to combat climate change.” Although it is difficult to develop detailed scenarios and models, the insurance industry can easily envision the impact that natural disasters will have on their risk management and underwriting in the future. Similarly, social and governance concerns have also been thrust into the spotlight by spectacular scandals in many industries, to a point that, as defined by the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), insurance companies and pension funds play a key role in acting on ESG issues [ 86 ].

Based on the extant academic literature and recent publications outside of scientific research, the objective of this work is to provide a comprehensive understanding of what is currently being done on sustainability in the insurance and pension sectors. To this end, we analyze 1 731 academic publications available through the Web of Science database using the PRISMA protocol for systematic literature review. We supplement this corpus with 23 publications retrieved from (insurance) organizations’ websites. We introduce a framework guided by the Principles for Sustainable Insurance (PSI) and the value chain of insurance companies (primary activities), insurance strategy (supporting activity), and external stakeholders and reporting to classify the literature. Our main results include a current review of the state of research and an overview on the sustainability issues and related actions along the categories of our framework.

Perceptions on sustainability have evolved over the past decade. When the topic of sustainable development emerged in the 1970s, it focused primarily on environmental issues. The first world conference on the environment was held in Stockholm in 1972 and established the UNEP as a global agency to manage the environmental agenda [ 94 ]. Many conferences later, an important initiative was launched by the UN, the so-called Millennium Development Goals [ 93 ] in 2000, encompassing eight major goals related to social and environmental issues to be achieved by 2015. However, practical standards and guidelines have only been developed since 2015. Two landmark events demonstrated the importance of finding appropriate solutions to current global challenges in 2015. These are the Paris agreement on Climate and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs, see [ 46 ]). While the first aims to limit global warming to 1.5  \(^{\circ }\) C [ 20 ], the SDGs have at their core 17 goals that members are expected to achieve by 2030. They address, social and environmental issues such as, no poverty, zero hunger, clean water and sanitation, responsible consumption and production, and climate action, among others. While until 2000, there were few initiatives and standards to assess sustainability challenges, we observe that in recent years, and especially since 2015, there has been an increasing number of developments committed to sustainable development.

In recent years, the need for addressing ESG challenges has increased dramatically. Although insurance companies and pension funds are not directly linked to any of the sustainability dimensions, awareness has changed recently. The insurance business processes including risk and investment management are strongly linked to ESG factors, and many companies have embarked on a journey for sustainability adaptation. In the present study we review the existing academic publications and study the research concerned with sustainability in the insurance sector. We find that the environmental aspect has received the most attention, especially in the underwriting and investment areas, which underlines that climate change is a key concern of the industry. On the other hand, we find that areas related to insurers’ activities along claims processing are less researched in academia, while the area of sales and marketing receives the lowest attention outside the academic world. Overall, the main issues that we identify include a lack of appropriate integration of sustainability in the strategy and operations as well as the absence of standardized quantitative indicators. The actions proposed in the literature indicate embedding ESG issues into all processes.

This work is organized as follows: in Sect.  2 , we lay out the relationship between insurance and sustainability and discuss the challenges the sector faces in addressing sustainability issues. In Sect.  3 , we discuss the literature review methodology, statistics on the corpus of literature, and introduce our classification framework along the insurance value chain. In Sect.  4 , we review key aspects of the retrieved literature based on the proposed classification framework and discus the main sustainability issues and potential related actions. We conclude in Sect.  5 .

2 Sustainability in insurance

Insurance is an essential pillar of global economic activity. Through their investments, but also given their exposure to losses and claims payments as well as in their role as risk managers, insurance companies and pension funds are concerned by the ESG factors. Therefore, it is important to understand and develop viable solutions to cope with the sustainability challenges but also to take advantage of market opportunities [ 47 ]. In this section, we describe the relationship between industry and sustainability, discuss the current state of the sector and key challenges, and provide selected insights into current practices in the area of sustainability.

ESG factors have established as a standard for describing sustainability issues and as target challenges when paving the way for achieving higher levels of sustainability in financial markets. As investors and risk managers, insurers and pension funds play a key role in ensuring sustainable development [ 6 ]. Insurers are exposed to sustainability issues on both underwriting and investment sides. Pricing, underwriting and claims management activities are concerned by increasing risks, for example from natural catastrophes. Given the size and duration of their institutional investment portfolios, insurers and pension funds are at the forefront of responsible investment.

In this context, it is important to take a closer look at the individual ESG factors. Concerning the environmental factor (E), we distinguish the effects associated to the two sides of the balance sheet, assets and liabilities. On the liabilities side, insurance is a leading sector in climate change adaptation [ 43 ]. Indeed, the sector provides financial resilience to extreme natural events and expertise for risk assessment [ 32 ]. For example, insurance companies have already developed products and services that help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. These products and services include risk transfer solutions for weather-related risks, crop insurance, microinsurance for small farmers, and renewable energy products [ 32 ]. On the assets side of the balance sheet, beyond the mere environmentally friendly investing, insurance-linked securities have gained notoriety as protection against insured losses (cf. catastrophe bonds, [ 59 ]).

Regarding the social (S) factor, insurers and pension funds are particularly concerned. On the one hand, they must care about workers’ pensions and therefore include workers’ rights, social inclusion, gender equality, child labor, and other SDGs. On the other hand, as principal asset owners, they should invest responsibly and “green”. One of the actions that have been carried out in this field are the microinsurance solutions to fight poverty in low-income countries [ 50 ]. In addition, the consideration of sustainable investments by pension funds has increased [ 1 ]. Finally, governance (G) is a key factor not only for the insurance sector, but also for all other sectors, since it does not differ significantly from company to company, especially in the financial sector. A better management strategy for a resilient and sustainable business requires a comprehensive approach in which the relationships with stakeholders, in particular customers, governments, and regulators, and all business activities in the value chain are organized and managed in a responsible manner [ 86 ]. Therefore, factors such as board diversity, corruption, and bribery, and improving internal controls and risk management are some themes that the insurance industry is already aware of an implementing [ 29 ].

Today, the growing trend towards addressing sustainability issues in insurance is unmistakable, as many companies and governments are promoting sustainable development as a major issue worldwide. Since 2000, there have been number of initiatives addressing sustainable development, and highlighting the growing role of insurance in this area [ 6 ]. One of the key global initiatives developed explicitly for the insurance industry is the PSI published by the UNEP Finance Initiative [ 86 ]. The main objective of the principles is to take a strategic approach to conducting the insurer’s key activities in a responsible manner, and to manage and assess risks and opportunities related to ESG issues in order to be a sustainable company. Currently, several global and national organizations are advocating for sustainability issues. Standards and principles have been developed for the insurance sector for both the asset and liability sides of the balance sheet.

However, despite the importance placed on sustainability globally and the increasing development of initiatives and frameworks for managing ESG issues, there are some challenges raised by practitioners and academics. First, one of the biggest challenges is the access to reliable data. For example, in many regions there is limited access to hazard and exposure data to assess physical climate risks [ 37 ]. Another major challenge is the need for a regulatory framework for financial markets. Due to unclear and fragmented regulations, it is difficult for primary insurers to access reinsurance and for investors to evaluate opportunities [ 32 ]. Furthermore, regarding environmental issues, specific challenges relate to the liability side of the balance sheet, for example, modeling of various adverse scenarios, sustainable reinsurance structures, and development of climate-related mortality tables [ 64 ]. In lower income countries, these challenges are complemented by a lack of insurance awareness, limited acceptance of natural catastrophe insurance, and the absence of domestic insurance [ 32 ]. On the asset side, challenges include the need for more green bonds and issuers, the development of new green financial instruments, the need for policy incentives to encourage green investment on a large scale, the failure to price carbon and natural resources, and the need for better climate risk reporting standards [ 32 ]. Insurers are increasingly recognizing environmental issues as part of their enterprise risk management [ 54 ]. More recently, events like the Covid-19 pandemic and social movements, such as the #MeToo movement against sexual harassment in 2017 and the #BlackLivesMatter movement that resurged in 2020 after George Floyd’s murder, have exposed social failures, and shed light on the poor social practices of some companies and governments, forcing them to initiate change. More specifically, in terms of governance, major challenges are, for example, the diversity of board members and workforce. Diversity and inclusion are important sustainability issues, but they also present opportunities to enhance the reputation and strengthen relationships with employees [ 29 ]. Finally, the unclear general definitions of sustainability in the insurance sector also pose risks for defining management roles and responsibilities [ 29 ]. Given the multiple facets of sustainability issues, we systemically review the academic literature in the sequel to derive a more comprehensive picture on the issues and related actions.

3 Literature review: methodology and statistics

In this section, we first present the search strategy and collection of publications leading to the corpus of selected academic papers and studies outside of scientific research that we call “practitioner” publications. We lay out the inclusion and exclusion criteria used in our review protocol (see Sect.  3.1 ). Then, we describe the overall statistics on the corpus of academic literature in Sect.  3.2 . In Sect.  3.3 , we propose a framework to classify the publications along the insurance value chain and external stakeholders. We present in Sect.  3.4 statistics on the academic publications based on the classification introduced in Sect.  3.3 . Finally, we present the statistics on the practitioner publications in Sect.  3.5 .

3.1 Review strategy and data collection

We have conducted a literature review to identify and classify existing academic research on sustainability in insurance. For the review, we follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol (PRISMA, see [ 62 ]). Our review is based on a search of the Web of Science Core Collection database for academic publications and of relevant organizations’ websites for practitioner publications. We proceeded in three phases by first running a general query for academic publications, then a complementary manual search, and finally a search for practitioner publications. A flowchart and synopsis of the three phases of our review protocol is presented in Fig.  1 .

The PRISMA review protocol used in the first phase consists of three key steps for the first phase. In the first step (identification), we consider all database records and restrict our search by using filters and keywords. Our query process included all years through December 2022 and academic publications recorded by Web of Science. We included English language documents and limited the keywords search to the abstract. The reason for using selected keywords is to consider the concept of sustainability, which refers specifically to insurance and relates to the ESG factors. For the selection, we used the keywords “insur*”, “pension*”, “actuar*”, “sustainab*”, “esg”, “environment*”, “soci*”, “govern*”, and “climate change” in the search string, where the asterisk (*) is a placeholder for any number of other characters. The keywords “insur*”, “pension*”, and “actuar*” make us include all insurance, pension, or actuarial science related publications. The terms “sustainab*” and “esg” have been added to filter for sustainability topics, while the words “environment*”, “soci*”, “govern*”, and “climate change” more precisely relate to the environmental, social and governance topics. Footnote 1 Our search retrieves a total of 1 731 publications.

Flow diagram for the identification and screening of records along PRISMA guidelines

In the second step, we scan the resulting records and exclude records in specific fields of research that do not relate to our topic (e.g., health fields like emergency medicine, rheumatology, obstetrics gynecology, geriatrics gerontology, surgery, and tropical medicine, and other fields like religion, philosophy, zoology, and government law). We review the titles and abstracts of the remaining records, and exclude 1 453 articles that do not relate to the insurance industry and sustainability issues. After this step, we remain with a total of 278 results. In a third step, we perform a screening of the full texts, which yields 28 publications. The inclusion criteria relate to articles in the insurance industry as a main player in sustainability, i.e., publications should address questions at the crossroads of insurance and sustainable business or ESG factors. We then conduct a forward and backward Footnote 2 literature search for the citing and cited references related to the 28 records and select a total of four and 11 articles, respectively. This leads us to 43 records. Finally, we manually conducted a second phase of search, capturing any insurance-related publications that were not included in the first phase due to the specificity of keywords. A total of eight publications have been added to our final corpus, resulting in a total number of 51 academic publications. In the third phase, we consider studies from relevant organizations from the last three years (2020–2022) and exclude short summaries that are less than five pages long. For our search, we consider the most relevant international and European organizations working in the field of sustainability in insurance. These organizations include programs of the United Nations, standard setters, regulatory authorities, insurance think tanks, insurance companies, and actuarial associations. We categorize the publications into four distinct types according to the organizations’ characteristics, i.e., “United Nations”, “Regulators”, “Insurance” and “Actuarial”. In the United Nations group we retain four publications, in the regulators type we select a total of six records, in the insurance group we select eight publications, and in the actuarial group we consider five records. This gives a total number of 23 practitioner studies. We present more details on the origins of the practitioner studies in Sect.  3.5 .

3.2 Statistics on the corpus of academic literature

The 51 publications included in the final corpus stem from 28 journals. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice (14), Sustainability (3), and Business Strategy and the Environment, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of Cleaner Production, Natural Hazards and Science (2), are the journals with the highest number of articles that have published research on sustainability in insurance through 2022 (see Table  1 ). Of the 14 articles in the Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice , 10 studies address climate change, and four articles treat sustainability issues in general. The authors appearing most frequently are Mills (single author of [ 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 ]) and Johannsdottir (author and coauthor of [ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ]) with four appearances each, all focusing on climate change and environmental sustainability. We note that among the 51 articles in our final corpus, 43 records focus on insurance companies, while the other eight articles discuss pension fund matters.

To identify and analyze the most relevant topics, we have examined the frequency of keywords in the corpus overarching the years from 2003 (oldest publication) to end of 2022. In a first step, we report the most frequent topics based on the author’s keywords field in the 51 publications. To form the topics, we have clustered keywords with similar or related meanings. For example, the topic “insurance” includes the keywords insurance, insurer, insure, and insurers; “environmental” includes the keywords of environment, green, and environmental. The term “investment” refers to investing, investment, and invest; “sustainability” includes sustain, sustainability, and sustainable words. Among the six most frequent topics, we find that “insurance” ranks first with 37 occurrences. The topic “climate change” ranks second with 19 occurrences. The topics “sustainability”, and “risk” rank third and fourth with 17 and 16 repetitions respectively. The topics “adaptation” and “social” rank fifth and sixth with 13 records each. The frequency analysis of the 20 most frequent topics that we report in Fig.  2 provides insight into what has been of most interest to research over the past two decades. Besides “insurance”, the keywords climate change, sustainability, social and environmental appear most frequently, which was to be expected given the search query for the selection of records. In order of appearance, climate change issues come first, followed by social and governance issues. We also observe that many keywords are related to the main characteristics of insurance such as risk, mitigation, and strategy.

Number of occurrences of the 20 most frequent topics in the keywords. Note: The topic “insurance” includes the keywords, insurance, insure, insurer and insurers; “environmental” term includes environmental, environment and green; “investment” includes investing, investment and invest; “sustainability” includes sustainability, sustain and sustainable

In a second step, we have linked the topic of each academic publication to the three ESG factors: the environmental factor includes topics related to climate change such as natural disasters, pollution, and natural resources; the social factor considers topics related to human rights, gender equality, labor standards, and other issues affecting society; the governance factor includes topics related to corporate governance, board composition, corruption, and bribery. The (general) keywords “ESG” and “sustainable development” are assigned to all three categories. In Fig.  3 , we present the resulting number of records by ESG factor and by year. On the first hand, we observe occurrences of publications regarding the environmental factor in almost all years. Moreover, the number of records seems to be increasing over the (most recent) years, from two records in 2003 to five records in 2022. On the second hand, regarding the governance and social factors, most records are found between 2017 and 2022 (although there are also some records in 2005 and 2010). We observe that a certain number of publications appeared in the years after 2007 relating to the publication of the climate change synthesis report by the IPCC [ 41 ]. Further, the increase of the number of records from 2017 onwards can be linked to the rising awareness in the scientific community after the Paris agreement [ 20 ] and the development of the UN SDGs in 2015 [ 46 ]. In addition, we note that all records are either devoted exclusively to the environmental factor or address the three, environmental, social, and governance, factors together. Thus, social and governance factors have never been treated alone in academic publications.

Number of academic publications per ESG factor and per year. Note: A publication can be counted several times if related to several ESG factors

Overall, we observe that there has been a lot of interest in researching environmental issues. This is primarily due to the insurance industry’s concern about the increase in natural disasters and associated risks. Furthermore, climate change is currently given great importance at the international level, and both public and private organizations are actively involved in promoting awareness of environmental issues. On the other hand, ESG practices have come to the forefront in recent years and have become a standard for achieving sustainability in financial markets. For example, ESG investing aims to meet the needs of investors and the public by incorporating long-term financial risks into investments decisions [ 11 ]. Therefore, an undeniable increasing trend for research on the insurance industry sustainability issues can be expected in the coming years.

At this stage, the statistics on the collected literature have helped us to get a first impression on the topics that got the most attention from academic research. In the following, we propose a classification framework along the insurance value chain to explore in greater detail the focus of the publications in our corpus.

3.3 Classification along the insurance value chain

To study the research areas covered by the retrieved corpus of literature and to more systematically assess extant research and potential gaps, we introduce a classification of key insurance sector activities guided by the PSI [ 86 ] and using previous works linking an insurer’s value chain processes to sustainable development (see, e.g., [ 45 , 81 ]). The first principle of the PSI encompasses the strategy and the operations of an insurance company. Principles 2 and 3 address external stakeholders of the insurance industry, namely, clients, suppliers, investors, governments and regulators. Furthermore, the fourth principle relates to the accountability and reporting of insurers. We distinguish supporting activities, primary activities, and external stakeholders and reporting. We provide further background information on the nine categories when discussing the literature in Sect.  4.1 .

As illustrated in Fig.  4 , we consider a framework based on nine main categories, including the value chain and relevant externalities. As a key representative for supporting activities in an insurance company we consider the company strategy (1). In the primary activities (operations), we consider product and service development (2), sales and marketing (3), risk management and underwriting (4), claims management (5), and investment management (6). Insurance companies are liable to several external stakeholders including clients, suppliers and investors (7) and the government and regulatory bodies (8) linked to their accountability and reporting (9). The proposed framework allows us to review which insurance activities are more researched (and concerned) with ESG issues (see Sect.  3.4 and Table  2 ).

Classification framework with nine categories along the insurance value chain and stakeholders

3.4 Statistics on the academic publications along the value chain categories

In Table  2 we report the number of publications of the final corpus that we have classified in each of the nine categories introduced in Sect.  3.3 (see Fig.  4 ). Thereby a publication may refer to one or more categories. Additionally, in each category we consider the three ESG factors to quantify the number of records relating to each factor (E, S, or G). This split provides insights on which share of the extant literature covers these specific topics.

The categories receiving the highest attention from academic research include the risk management and underwriting (4), the investment management (6) and the government and regulatory bodies (8). In each of these categories, we record over 20 publications, with most of them related to environmental issues. The categories company strategy (1) and product and service development (2) rank fourth and fifth in terms of number of publications. All the other activities receive much less attention, in particular sales and marketing (3) and claims management (2) with merely three and two records, respectively. We observe that in most categories academic research focuses primarily on environmental factors (E). In Table  3 we summarize the academic publications included in each category. More details and a complete classification of the 51 academic publications in the final corpus are provided in Table  7 in the Appendix. The summary table includes information on the regions where the study was conducted, the research method used, and the key contents and main results for each publication. Furthermore, for each publication we indicate the relevant categories (1 to 9) and ESG factors to which it refers.

The statistics reported in Table  2 highlight an important academic research gap, particularly in the categories sales and marketing and claims management where the number of publications is low. However, our statistics also show that the environmental issue has received the most attention over the past two decades, particularly regarding risk management and underwriting. Social and governance factors are less studied, although they get some attention in relation with investment management.

3.5 Statistics on practitioner publications along the value chain categories

In this section, we first summarize the 23 practitioner studies along the nine categories of the insurance value chain (see Sect.  3.3 ). In analogy to Table  2 for the academic publications, we report in Table  4 the number of records in practitioner studies in each category and ESG factor. We observe that, as with the academic publications, the risk management and underwriting (4) category is the most discussed in practitioner publications. In the sales and marketing (3) category, we found only one study dealing with the environmental topic. However, we can also observe that categories that have been less researched in academia, such as claims management (5), clients, suppliers and investors (7), and accountability and reporting (9) are of great interest to practitioners. In addition, we note that environmental risks are the most studied by practitioners when compared to social and governance risks. We provide more details on the selected practitioner publications in Table  8 in the Appendix.

As mentioned in Sect.  3 , we have categorized the practitioner contributions into four distinct types. For the United Nations group, we have identified the UNEP Finance Initiative PSI, the global framework for insurance-specific treatment of ESG issues, with four publications. For the group of regulators and standard setters, we have considered the main body in Europe for insurance companies and pension funds, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) with three publications, an international body, the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) with one publication, and the insurance-specific network dealing with sustainability issues, the Sustainable Insurance Forum (SIF) with two publications. We excluded national regulatory bodies whose ESG related publications typically take the form of directives. The “insurance” group encompasses records from the main public organizations, private companies (e.g., Swiss Re, Allianz, Munich Re, AXA, Zurich, Aviva, Generali) and think tanks. After review, we included the Geneva Association (GA) with four publications, the Chief Risk Officers Forum (CRO Forum), and Swiss Re with two publications in our corpus. In the actuarial group, we have considered the International Actuarial Association (IAA) with four publications and the Actuarial Association of Europe (AAE) with one publication. In Table  5 , we provide an overview of the publications and the classification along the nine value chain categories.

4 Results and discussion

In this section, we review the retrieved publications and discuss their contents. In Sect.  4.1 , we first describe the relevance to sustainability of each framework category (Fig.  4 ) and put the existing research, including both academic and practitioner publications, in context. In Sect.  4.2 , we summarize the main results of the extant literature in terms of issues and related actions (see Table  6 ), and, in the light of the findings, we discuss the current state of the insurance industry with regards to sustainability issues.

4.1 Review of the literature

Company strategy. As a first step towards becoming a sustainable company, the strategy must be well defined and include sustainability at all levels of the organization. With the goal of identifying and monitoring ESG issues in business operations, insurers need consistent corporate strategy at the board and executive levels. The strategy must integrate sustainability into all business areas and the corporate culture, and determine appropriate quantitative indicators to measure progress [ 81 ].

Research related to sustainable strategies is found in the area of corporate sustainability, which refers to companies addressing sustainability issues, including economic, environmental, and social factors (see, e.g., [ 68 ] for a systematic literature review). Corporate governance is important for the strategy to develop well-structured frameworks [ 44 , 99 ]. For example, in the case of socially responsible pension funds and with the demand for sustainable development, institutional shareholders care more about social and environmental values, which they transfer to corporate governance [ 2 ].

In addition, the literature emphasizes the importance of using green technologies [ 9 , 50 ] as the main strategy for climate adaptation. Environmental sustainability and climate change actions need to be integrated into the insurers’ core business [ 45 ]. Altarhouni et al. [ 3 ] insist that all actors of the insurance sector, including insurers, reinsurers and pension funds, should develop strategies to reduce environmental degradation by investing in clean energy sources. Furthermore, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been identified as a key practice for the strategy of insurance companies and pension funds [ 38 , 78 ]. The insurance industry can play a pioneering role in CSR. Insurance companies typically have incorporated social and ethical issues into their business activities, but not environmental issues, so that many insurers do not realize their full potential for a more sustainable industry [ 76 ]. The article by Ho et al. [ 38 ] describes that for Taiwanese insurance companies, managerial practices are the most significant dimension of CSR, with corporate strategies and commitments the most important criteria. However, we note that the strategy area is not well documented in our final corpus, particularly regarding social and governance factors.

Product and service development. In our framework, we consider the development of products and services as the first operations activity of an insurer. Our literature review highlights that it is necessary to distinguish between the products and services offered by insurance companies in developing countries and in developed countries. For example, in developing countries, climate-related microinsurance products are more in demand by policyholders than most of such products in the traditional market [ 54 ]. In addition, there is also a growing demand for weather-related and nature-aligned products in developed countries. These insurance products can also reduce underwriting losses, stimulate the growth of insurance assets, and help restore damaged natural capital [ 8 ]. Such propositions include crop parametric products for drought risks based on a soil moisture index and property (flood) parametric products based on an excess rainfall index [ 83 ]. Regarding social issues, the world is experiencing an aging population, especially in Europe. Given the pressure on public budgets, it is likely that society and governments will be very receptive to more creative and affordable insurance and pension propositions. There are already examples of interactions between governments, individuals, and private companies, such as insurers and asset managers working together on the definition of the pan-European personal pension product (PEPP), a voluntary personal pension scheme, complementary to state-based and occupational pensions, that offers EU citizens a new option to save for retirement [ 16 ].

Therefore, the development of sustainable products and services provides opportunities and challenges for the core insurance business [ 58 ]. For instance, one challenge is to design and price products that consider climate risks and stakeholders. For insurance companies, this may mean raising premiums or excluding coverage in areas at elevated risk for climate-related events such as floods or bushfires. On the other hand, there is an opportunity to develop products that align policyholder interests with behaviors that lead to better climate outcomes. This could be achieved by introducing incentives that eliminate or control risks, low-carbon annuity products, or providing capital for initiatives that address climate risks [ 96 ].

One of the main goals of sustainable insurance is to develop products and services that reduce risks and have a positive impact on ESG issues. Possible actions suggested by the PSI include offering microinsurance to developing countries where access to insurance is limited and supporting programs on risk, insurance, and ESG issues [ 86 ]. Some insurance companies have developed “green” insurance products and features. Examples include the coverage for electric and hydrogen vehicles, discounts for low- and zero-emission vehicles, and for policyholders who use public transportation, repair rather than replace, and coverage for sharing mobility [ 81 ]. Other examples contributing to environmental sustainability include electric cars and renewable energy solutions [ 45 ]. The insurance industry has developed products such as environmental pollution liability insurance in response to the rise of liabilities it has faced over time [ 92 ]. Insurance companies that find the best solutions with innovative and sustainable products and services will lead the insurance markets in the future.

Sales and marketing. The least researched category with merely three retrieved academic publications and one practitioner study in our literature review is sales and marketing. Nevertheless, the associated operational processes are key for sales promotion, advertising, channel relationships and distribution. Indeed, an appropriate marketing strategy can make customers aware of sustainability issues and provide them with the best option for their expectations. To meet the requirements of a sustainable company, PSI suggests, first, educating sales staff about ESG issues and, second, integrating key messages responsibly into campaigns and social media [ 86 ]. The sales and marketing team must understand and explain the (sustainability) benefits and costs of each product offered by the company. For example, promoting an insurer’s efforts to mitigate weather disasters is an important tool in a marketing strategy to strengthen customer loyalty [ 49 , 95 ].

Currently, insurance companies are already actively promoting extreme weather risk management to raise awareness of how the industry is responding to the impacts of climate change [ 95 ]. However, there is a potential risk to insurers’ reputations if false advertising, known as “greenwashing”, is used as in marketing campaigns [ 29 ]. In addition, the lack of common definitions and standards for measuring the contribution of products and services to climate change mitigation and adaptation may increase the risk of greenwashing [ 23 ]. One suggestion to avoid the image of using greenwashing as marketing is to apply standards, best practice and established measures (see, e.g., the Science-Based Target initiative, SBTi, [ 73 ], and [ 81 ]).

Risk management and underwriting. Actuaries play an active role in risk management and underwriting. In this category, we focus on liability and underwriting in the context of insurance companies’ and pension funds’ risk management. The extant literature focuses primarily on environmental issues, highlighting the interest in developing measures to manage, measure and mitigate the increase in natural disasters.

In their role as risk managers, insurance companies provide expertise in catastrophe risk modeling, risk assessment, and preventive measures [ 32 ]. An alarming figure that illustrates the importance of underwriting is that the economic cost of weather damage alone could exceed USD 1 trillion by 2040 worldwide [ 21 ]. Thus, underwriters are facing huge challenges, mainly because catastrophe models are not well calibrated, premiums are too low, risk exposures are extremely high, and the climate protection gap is growing. However, increasing insurance coverage alone is not enough to close the protection gap, as the increasing frequency and severity of certain natural events could make some risks uninsurable. Measures that can be implemented include proactive mitigation initiatives for buildings, localization of risks, and optimized levels of insurance coverage [ 26 ]. Another survey study on flood damages in the United Kingdom reports insurance losses from floods of GBP 1.7 billion in 2007 [ 7 ]. To respond to these challenges, the academic literature has studied several actions. For instance, Begum et al. [ 9 ], discusses how green technology strategies can help to reduce the impact of natural disasters in Malaysia. In addition, Botzen et al. [ 12 ] suggests that increasing crop insurance policies is a business opportunity to cover drought losses in the Netherlands. Toward best practices, Mills [ 54 ] indicates that appropriate risk management in businesses requires a reassessment of existing risk management tools in response to environmental issues. On a broader level, Glaas et al. [ 30 ] shows the importance of government involvement for insurer stability and risk prevention measures.

Insurers’ risk management requires immediate action to address the consequences of climate change, at the global and local levels due to the increase in extreme natural disasters and the associated risk of increasing insurance losses [ 37 , 61 , 63 , 72 ]. In addition, the increase of natural catastrophes does not only come with an increased risk in terms of frequency and severity, but the frequency of these events is more unpredictable over time [ 65 ]. Moreover, the consideration of comprehensive ESG risk assessments beyond the pure environmental aspects is critical when the developing risk management and underwriting. One of the keys to sustainable development in insurance risk management is technological innovation [ 19 ]. By developing and providing knowledge to mitigate losses through risk engineering and insuring sustainable technologies, the sector can play an important role [ 79 ]. In addition, especially in the case of climate change, the use of specific financial instruments such as cat bonds and catastrophe risk swaps are important tools for disaster risk management [ 85 ].

With respect to sustainability risks, risk management and underwriting are a top business priority and must be addressed by actuaries. According to the PSI, appropriate processes to identify and assess ESG issues should be incorporated into the portfolio, the modeling, and all analyses done within the company [ 86 ]. The top priority in risk management is to invest in the mitigation of losses. Mitigation and prevention of disasters can range from reducing risk exposure to creating institutions for better response, such as land use and emergency planning [ 50 ]. An interesting five-step roadmap for risk management, aimed primarily at small and medium-sized insurance companies, has been proposed by Stricker et al. [ 81 ], and consists of integrating sustainability into risk assessments, reviews of risk objectives, setting tolerance levels, risk monitoring and reporting, and external environment monitoring.

Claims management. Given the share of an insurer’s costs related to claims, claims management is fundamental to insurers and presents potential opportunities. However, claims management has not been largely studied from a sustainability perspective: only two publications appear in our literature review. The article by Sato and Seki [ 72 ] discusses the case of Japan and emphasizes that insurance companies must have a well-structured claims assessment process that promotes precautionary measures within the company. This is critical to minimize losses from natural disasters and to improve claims payments. Two examples for moving towards a greener industry in claims management are the use of image recognition technologies in claims assessments, such as photos of local repair companies, and the creation of a greenhouse gas emissions inventory for all operations and processes in claims management [ 81 ].

To achieve sustainable insurance, a comprehensive claims management strategy including stakeholders, namely, the customers, must be on the agenda of insurance companies. A critical part of an insurer’s value chain is managing the total cost of risk from claims. Root cause analysis, repairing a loss, and improving claims management strategies are examples of better practices. In recent years, the number of climate-related claims has increased [ 96 ]. In terms of physical risk, worker’s compensation claims are a relevant example since climate can affect mortality and morbidity risks at work. It takes longer for claims to develop, and new sources of risk may emerge. Reserving methods may be affected by changes in claims payment patterns that are difficult to determine from historical data [ 57 ]. One of the main concerns for insurers is damage to their reputation in terms of how well they can insure sustainability risks, keep them affordable, and provide good service after catastrophic losses. One solution is smart claims payments to “build back better” after a disaster. This approach could increase the resilience of society and better align the interests of insurers and customers [ 4 ]. Another solution is the use of remote sensing, which simplifies existing processes such as claims management. For example, remote sensing-based flood detection can provide access to timely insights for claims developments. Furthermore, the use of technologies from remote sensing satellites can help assess the risk of subsidence, by measuring soil movement, and identify claims for property insurance [ 83 ].

Investment management. Insurance companies and pension funds are among of the largest institutional investors in the global economy. Therefore, investment management is a relevant lever for addressing sustainability issues. Importance also comes with the long-term investment horizon. Our literature review shows that insurers’ investment practices are well researched. Moreover, there is an undeniable growing interest in considering ESG investment practices in the insurance industry [ 2 ]. So-called “sustainable investing” is of great importance for the sector and investors’ interest has increased in recent years [ 28 ].

Several studies highlight the benefits of ESG investments with a positive impact on investment decisions, such as the National green technology policy in Malaysia [ 9 ]. Similarly, appropriate solutions addressing climate change provide profitable investment opportunities [ 80 ]. Nevertheless, climate change also comes with higher risks, for example, regarding real estate investments. For this reason, life insurance companies, which mainly own long-term assets, are more affected by climate change than property insurance companies [ 69 ]. Among the investment strategies, ESG integration and impact investing are the two most frequently mentioned in recent years [ 28 ]. Five main mitigation measures are proposed in pension fund sustainability reports: divestment, direct engagement, carbon footprint calculation, investing in green options, and participating in climate-related coalitions. Long-term sustainable investments are likely to be beneficial and successful, especially in the area of retirement insurance [ 60 ]. As a result, some companies have already incorporated exclusion criteria in their portfolio strategies to respond to environmental risks [ 15 ]. However, the use of these measures has been counterproductive in some pension funds in taming the fossil fuel sector. For instance, some pension funds practice industry-wide divestment, such as from tobacco and nuclear weapons, although they rarely target the fossil fuel sector. Other pension funds practice conditional divestment, where they only divest from a company as a last resort if a set of criteria is not met [ 70 ]. In addition, the incorporation of ESG practices into the investment management of pension funds and insurance companies, essentially socially responsible and environmental investing, is increasingly required by the market and should be considered a priority in decision making [ 54 ]. On the opportunity side, a proposed solution to climate change, especially for large insurers, is to fund client projects that improve resilience [ 80 ].

One of the most important guidelines related to sustainability in investments are the principles for responsible investment  [ 88 ], whose defined goal is to achieve sustainable global finance by incorporating ESG factors into investment portfolios. In addition, standards have been developed, particularly on the social factor such as, socially responsible investing , which includes social factors as well as areas like community investment and shareholder advocacy [ 31 ]. Investors have used ESG information mainly through ratings, which help transform ESG data into investment products for decision making. Nonetheless, ESG practices are gaining traction in the insurance sector, with further development of ratings required [ 11 ]. Existing data providers in the market include Bloomberg, Morningstar, Thompson Reuters, MSCI, and Sustainalytics, which tend to focus on financial institutions. They consider some of the key criteria within the three ESG factors. For example, environmental factors include carbon emissions, pollution, and natural resource use; social factors include health and diversity issues, human rights, privacy, and community engagement. Under the corporate governance factor, we find, among other things, corporate ethics, board independence and shareholder rights. Many of the largest pension funds are actively working to improve their ESG practices, however there is still room for improvement. Overall, integrating ESG issues into investment management is critical to achieving better long-term investment returns and addressing climate risks [ 51 ].

Clients, suppliers and investors. External stakeholders include clients, suppliers and investors. Principle 2 of the PSI specifically addresses these crucial players in the insurance industry. Our literature review highlights that long-term relationships with policyholders and customers are one of the most important mechanisms for insurers to pursue an integrated sustainability strategy [ 71 ]. The practice of CSR engagement by insurers has recently had a positive impact on customer behavior [ 49 ]. Regarding the environmental factor, incentives for customers with ESG commitment lead them to consider greener options in the insurance industry [ 97 ]. For example, insurance companies in Massachusetts have offered discounts of 10% to customers who complete a free six-hour course on weatherization Footnote 3 and home repairs [ 52 ].

Customers are also concerned about the social factor. On the one hand, for example, pension funds get involved by, e.g., informing pension fund members about where their funds are invested and whether they are invested considering ESG issues. In non-life insurance, policyholders expect that coverage will continue to be available and affordable, and that claims will be settled at an elevated level after a catastrophe event. However, sustainability risks can disrupt this and negatively impact clients and potentially lead to reputational risks for insurers [ 4 ]. On the other hand, insurers should promote corporate commitment to sustainability issues through marketing strategies to attract more policyholders and raise awareness in the global community. Thereby, it is important to act responsibly on all ESG issues. Based on guidance from the PSI, a number of actions have been proposed, such as starting a dialogue with policyholders and suppliers about the benefits of ESG management and the company’s sustainability expectations and encouraging policyholders and suppliers to use relevant ESG disclosures [ 86 ]. Insurers have to work together with their clients, suppliers, and investors to contribute to a sustainable business.

Government and regulatory bodies. Climate change is an example showcasing the need for insurance companies, governments, and society to develop sustainable solutions together [ 36 , 42 ]. Regulation can boost the sustainability agenda and change the way business is done. Regulating the integration of ESG factors can help to reduce risks and better manage sustainability (cf. the current efforts by the EIOPA to explicitly integrate sustainability in the solvency regulation, see [ 22 ]). Thereby, regulatory bodies improve the monitoring of sustainability issues. In addition, governments, along with insurers and society, are important players in promoting ESG issues, especially in areas where more capital is needed, as in the case of extreme weather events [ 54 ]. Governments can influence private insurance companies in adapting to sustainability with a longer-term perspective. For example, the Norwegian government has initiated an approach to public-private compensation of insurers for costly extreme events, called the Norwegian natural perils pool [ 30 ]. The Swiss natural perils pool (“Elementarschaden-Pool”) also intends to optimize risk diversification and risk exposure among the participating insurers covering 90% of the natural perils market [ 82 ]. In Europe, however, only a quarter of climate-related and extreme event losses have been insured over the past 40 years, revealing a climate protection gap [ 26 ]. Other factors in which governments can be involved include providing a water management solution and establishing monitoring systems for extreme natural events [ 85 ]. Another example of government involvement can be found in the United Kingdom, where the government works with private insurers to provide flood insurance [ 95 ].

Two important actions proposed by the PSI include dialogue with intergovernmental and nongovernmental institutions to promote sustainable development, and support for policy, regulatory, and legal bodies that enable risk mitigation and better management of ESG issues [ 86 ]. Policy options that the state can use include motivating technology developers to behave prudently by creating a liability regime, encouraging innovation ideas by creating non-liability regimes and effectively allocating risk to third parties, promoting insurance in the risk market by setting liability limits, and promoting social equity by making insurance mandatory [ 19 ].

Accountability and reporting. The literature shows that it is of utmost importance to publicly disclose the actions on the relevant challenges in terms of ESG factors [ 38 ]. Currently, insurance companies and pension funds, particularly in Europe, have begun to report annually on their progress and actions related to environmental and sustainability issues. Since 2015, numerous standards and regulatory measures have been developed for sustainability, sustainable finance, and climate-related disclosures. An analysis by the UNEP has found that around 25% of these measures address disclosure of ESG factors, sustainability, and climate risks [ 39 ]. One of the most influential organizations on climate issues is the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), which recommends climate reporting based on four main pillars (governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets, see [ 18 ]). In sustainability reporting, one of the main guidelines used in practice are those of the Global reporting initiative, whose standards aim to strengthen sustainability and transparency in the insurance market. Another practice increasingly used in the insurance industry is CSR reporting. The European Commission adopted the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) in April 2021, which replaces the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) and broadens the scope of reporting requirements. The CSRD mandates companies to furnish information that enables an understanding of the impact of sustainability-related issues on the company and its effects on people and the environment [ 17 , 74 ].

Potential actions suggested by the PSI include monitoring and measuring the company’s progress in addressing ESG issues, participating in relevant reporting frameworks, and engaging in dialogue with regulators and rating agencies to gain a mutual understanding of the value of disclosure. Reporting has become increasingly important in recent years. Annual reporting on progress and actions on ESG issues is the means to inform policymakers and society on how the company is responding to sustainability issues [ 86 ]. Therefore, information disclosure, reporting, accountability, and transparency are key to achieve sustainable insurance and must be a priority for the industry today.

4.2 Discussion of sustainability issues and related actions

To complement the literature review presented in Sect.  4.1 , we propose a summary of the main findings in Table  6 : we lay out the main sustainability issues and some potential related actions per category that appear in the final corpus of literature.

As sustainable insurance has become a key objective, it is undeniable that insurance companies and pension funds must act responsibly to respond to the ESG challenges of our time. Building socio-economic resilience is at the core of the insurance business. Companies need (to develop) well-structured risk management and adaptation strategies [ 32 ]. They also need to understand the exclusion and inclusion criteria for ESG investments and manage them in a sustainable manner. In addition, our literature review has revealed that specific attention must be paid to insurance activities such as sales and marketing, claims management, and clients, suppliers and investors, as there is a lack of research in these areas. When considering the publications, we also observe that most of the articles focus on developed countries and issues from climate change. We also find some specific actions and proposals that the insurers have incorporated into their strategy and operations. Academic research shows that the issues of sustainability and insurance are growing and are important to both researchers and practitioners. Indeed, there is no doubt that numerous challenges arise when developing adaptation.

We have seen a lot of attention paid to sustainability in financial markets. Insurance companies are conducting ESG assessments, largely due to pressure from the society, their customers and regulators. At the time of writing, several initiatives and principles have become available and insurance companies must achieve a net-zero greenhouse gas emissions commitment by 2050 [ 89 ]. However, understanding the definitions and the lack of data, regulations, standards, and best practices make it difficult for insurers to achieve the goal.

Small and medium-sized insurance companies need to put sustainability on their agenda and start the transition by implementing actions and measures that will help the entire sector become a sustainable business. Furthermore, not only small and mid-sized insurers, but all actors need to consider the complex sustainability journey when outlining the path to implementation. A comprehensive roadmap for green insurance along the value chain, particularly for small and medium-sized insurers, is proposed by Stricker et al. [ 81 ], which identifies five key steps in each area of the insurer value chain. The steps include insuring green attributes in the product and service development category, integrating sustainability into risk management and underwriting, and inventorying greenhouse gas emissions in the claims management area.

Our study on the current state of literature reveals number of elements hindering the sustainable development in insurance. First, we note that the insurance sector depends on external factors beyond its control, such as regulatory frameworks and shareholder decisions. In addition, there are few data sets, metrics, and theories to model ESG risks. Furthermore, the insurance industry needs a detailed roadmap and process for implementing sustainability that is not yet well defined. For example, while the measures proposed in the PSI provide general guidance on the four principles, they say little about how they should be implemented in practice, particularly with regard to the first principle for company strategy, claims management and sales and marketing. Another limitation relates to the different ESG assessments. For example, different investors approach ESG factors differently; some companies have already fully integrated ESG factors, while others are just beginning to implement them. Moreover, ESG assessments are valued differently by different investors and agencies [ 98 ]. Finally, the definition of sustainability must be reliable and endure over time. As a prominent example of that uncertainty, we note that the scope of green energy in Europe has recently changed, and, under the EU Taxonomy, nuclear energy has been classified as green [ 40 ].

5 Conclusion

In this work, we present the results of a systematic literature review on sustainability in insurance companies and pension funds. Our results provide an overview of the main sustainability issues and related actions along the key insurance activities. Guided by the PSI and the insurance value chain, the review and the summary findings are structured along nine categories relating to the company strategy, six core operations (product and service development, sales and marketing, risk management and underwriting, claims management, investment management), and clients, suppliers and investors, government and regulatory bodies, as well as accountability and reporting. Although academic research has seen important developments in recent years, we have identified gaps, for example in the areas of claims management and marketing. Throughout the publications, we observe that the academic community acknowledges that acting on sustainability issues is not only a stake in the future, but a real challenge in the present for the insurance sector.

In terms of ESG factors, the environmental factor is the most prevalent across all categories in our literature. On the liability side, insurance companies are directly affected by climate change risks. For the risk management and underwriting operations, many academics call for more metrics and models to manage ESG risks. On the other hand, on the asset side, insurers and pension funds can actively influence the future through their institutional investments and related engagements. We observe that both insurance companies and pension funds focus mainly on environmental and social factors in their sustainable investments. Despite their interest in governance issues and although it is a fundamental part of corporate strategy, the fact that governance is not insurance-specific and more difficult to measure could be the reason there are only few publications addressing this issue in the insurance literature. In addition, in our literature review, we note that the governance factor is usually not discussed alone, but together with one or two factors, i.e., environmental, or social factors. This is particularly the case in the practitioner studies. Overall, we find that more detailed sustainability roadmaps need to be developed and guidelines require more thorough integration. The latter thoughts should also include areas such as claims management and sales and marketing. Accountability and reporting, an area that has seen significant developments recently, is of great interest to practitioners, and there is no doubt that academic publications on this topic will also increase in the coming years.

While the present contribution provides a review of the existing literature, further research should be considered as an extension. First, many of the current models in risk management and underwriting do not yet incorporate ESG factors, leaving room for future research and requiring engagement from actuaries. Second, specifically for the environmental factor, further studies can be conducted on the impact of climate change-related risks on pricing, underwriting, risk management, and solvency. Finally, more research is also required on the impact and implementation of specific social and governance factors. This will be particularly relevant since their modeling and measurement in practice is more difficult.

Data Availability

Not applicable.

The exact query is as follows: AB=((“insur*" OR “pension*" OR “actuar*") AND (“sustainab*" OR “esg") AND (“environment*" OR “soci*" OR “govern*" OR “climate change")) .

In forward tracking we consider the publications that have cited a given record; in backward tracking we analyze the references cited in a given record.

Courses on weatherization provide basic knowledge of building science related to airflow, heat flow and moisture flow, combustion safety and testing. They are designed in accordance with guidelines specified by the U.S. Department of Energy, see https://www.greentrainingusa.com/doe-weatherization-installer-1-and-2-training.html .

Alda M (2019) Corporate sustainability and institutional shareholders: the pressure of social responsible pension funds on environmental firm practices. Bus Strategy Environ 28(6):1060–1071

Article   Google Scholar  

Alda M (2020) ESG fund scores in UK SRI and conventional pension funds: are the ESG concerns of the SRI niche affecting the conventional mainstream? Finance Res Lett 36:101313

Altarhouni A, Danju D, Samour A (2021) Insurance market development, energy consumption, and Turkey’s CO \(_2\) emissions. New perspectives from a bootstrap ARDL test. Energies 14(23):7830

Armengol Vivas C, Crugnola-Humbert J, Krylowicz T, Modisett M, Schiller F, Zelinkova J (2022) Sustainability issues and reputational risk for insurance companies and pension funds, Technical Report. Actuarial Association of Europe

Autenne A, Degoli MC, Hartmann-Cortés K (2021) Introduction to the special issue on sustainable pensions: do sustainable pensions require sustainable investments? Eur J Soc Secur 23(3):191–199

Bacani B, McDaniels J, Robins N (2015) Insurance 2030—harnessing insurance for sustainable development

Ball T, Werritty A, Geddes A (2013) Insurance and sustainability in flood-risk management: the UK in a transitional state. Area 45(3):266–272

Baral P (2021) Nature-related risks in the global insurance sector, Technical Report. Sustainable Insurance Forum

Begum RA, Komoo I, Pereira JJ (2011) Green Technology for Disaster Risk Reduction. Green Technology for Disaster Risk Reduction 1(2011):279–282

Benali N, Feki R (2017) The impact of natural disasters on insurers’ profitability: evidence from property/casualty insurance company in United States. Res Int Bus Finance 42:1394–1400

Boffo R, Patalano R (2020) ESG investing: practices, progress and challenges

Botzen WJ, van den Bergh JC, Bouwer LM (2010) Climate change and increased risk for the insurance sector: a global perspective and an assessment for the Netherlands. Nat Hazards 52(3):577–598

Bourtembourg J, Languedoc L, Overton G, Ramella M (2021) The impact of climate change on the financial stability of the insurance sector, Technical Report. International Association of Insurance Supervisors

Brogi M, Cappiello A, Lagasio V, Santoboni F (2022) Determinants of insurance companies’ environmental, social, and governance awareness. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag (March):1–13

Chiaramonte L, Dreassi A, Paltrinieri A, Piserà S (2020) Sustainability practices and stability in the insurance industry. Sustainability 12(14):5530

CRO Forum (2020) Imagine all the people: demographics and social change from an insurance perspective, Technical Report

CRO Forum (2021) Mind the sustainability gap: integrating sustainability into insurance risk management, Technical Report

Crugnola-Humbert J, Fiallos S, Fleming D, Latham A, Cynthia Yuan X (2022) Climate-related disclosures and risk management: standards and leading practices, Technical Report. International Actuarial Association

Dahlström K, Skea J, Stahel WR (2003) Innovation. Insurability and sustainable development: sharing risk management between insurers and the state. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 28(3):394–412

Delbeke J, Runge-Metzger A, Slingenberg Y, Werksman J (2019) The Paris Agreement

Dlugolecki A (2008) Climate change and the insurance sector. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 33(1):71–90

EIOPA (2019) Opinion on sustainability within solvency II. EIOPA

EIOPA (2021) Report on non-life underwriting and pricing in light of climate change, Technical Report

EIOPA (2022) European insurers’ exposure to physical climate change risk, Technical Report

EIOPA (2022) Guidance on the integration of sustainability preferences in the suitability assessment under the insurance distribution directive, Technical Report

EIOPA (2022) The dashboard on insurance protection gap for natural catastrophes in a nutshell, Technical Report

Garayeta A, De la Peña JI, Trigo E (2022) Towards a global solvency model in the insurance market: a qualitative analysis. Sustainability 14(11):6465

Gatzert N, Reichel P (2022) Sustainable investing in the US and European insurance industry: a text mining analysis. Palgrave Macmillan, London

Google Scholar  

Gatzert N, Reichel P, Zitzmann A (2020) Sustainability risks and opportunities in the insurance industry. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft 109(5):311–331

Glaas E, Keskitalo ECH, Hjerpe M (2017) Insurance sector management of climate change adaptation in three nordic countries: the influence of policy and market factors. J Environ Plan Manag 60(9):1601–1621

Glac K (2009) Understanding socially responsible investing: the effect of decision frames and trade-off options. J Bus Ethics 87:41–55

Golnaraghi M (2018) Climate change and the insurance industry: taking action as risk managers and investors

Golnaraghi M, Geneva Association (2021) Insurance industry perspectives on regulatory approaches to climate risk assessment, Technical Report

Golnaraghi M, Geneva Association (2022) Anchoring climate change risk assessment in core business decisions in insurance, Technical Report

Golnaraghi M, Mellot A (2022) Nature and the insurance industry: taking action towards a nature-positive economy, Technical Report. The Geneva Association

Hawker M (2007) Climate change and the global insurance industry. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 32(1):22–28

Herweijer C, Ranger N, Ward RE (2009) Adaptation to climate change: threats and opportunities for the insurance industry. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 34(3):360–380

Ho CC, Huang C, Ou CY (2018) Analysis of the factors influencing sustainable development in the insurance industry. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 25(4):391–410

IAIS (2020) Issues paper on the implementation of the recommendations of the task force on climate-related financial disclosures, Technical Report. International Association of Insurance Supervisors and Sustainable Insurance Forum

Igini M (2022) Gas and nuclear turn green as EU Parliament approves new taxonomy. https://earth.org/gas-and-nuclear-turn-green-eu-taxonomy/

IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change

Johannsdottir L (2014) The Geneva association framework for climate change actions of insurers: a case study of nordic insurers. J Clean Prod 75:20–30

Johannsdottir L, Davidsdottir B, Goodsite ME, Olafsson S (2014) What is the potential and demonstrated role of non-life insurers in fulfilling climate commitments? A case study of nordic insurers. Environ Sci Policy 38:87–106

Johannsdottir L, McInerney C (2018) Developing and using a five C framework for implementing environmental sustainability strategies: a case study of nordic insurers. J Clean Prod 183:1252–1264

Johannsdottir L, Olafsson S, Davidsdottir B (2015) Leadership role and employee acceptance of change implementing environmental sustainability strategies within nordic insurance companies. J Organ Change Manag 28(1):77–96

Johnston RB (2016) Arsenic and the 2030 agenda for sustainable development, arsenic research and global sustainability. In: Proceedings of the 6th international congress on arsenic in the environment, AS 2016, pp 12–14

Kanojia R (2014) Insurance and its role in sustainable development. Glob J Finance Manag 6(3):227–232

Keskitalo ECH, Vulturius G, Scholten P (2014) Adaptation to climate change in the insurance sector: examples from the UK, Germany and the Netherlands. Nat Hazards 71(1):315–334

Lee C-Y, Chang W-C, Lee H-C (2017) An investigation of the effects of corporate social responsibility on corporate reputation and customer loyalty—evidence from the Taiwan non-life insurance industry. Soc Responsib J 13(2):355–369

Linnerooth-Bayer J, Warner K, Bals C, Höppe P, Burton I, Loster T, Haas A (2009) Insurance. Developing countries and climate change. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 34(3):381–400

Meins P, Furlan T, Shier P (2020) Pension fund environmental, social and governance risk disclosures: developing global practice, Technical Report. International Actuarial Association

Mills E (2003) The insurance and risk management industries: new players in the delivery of energy-efficient and renewable energy products and services. Energy Policy 31(12):1257–1272

Mills E (2005) Insurance in a climate of change. Science 309(5737):1040–1044

Mills E (2009) A global review of insurance industry responses to climate change. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 34(3):323–359

Mills E (2012) The greening of insurance. Science 338(6113):1424–1425

Müller-Fürstenberger G, Schumacher I (2015) Insurance and climate-driven extreme events. J Econ Dyn Control 54:59–73

Article   MathSciNet   MATH   Google Scholar  

Musulin R, Dal Moro E, Gutterman S, Young E, Zalk T (2021) Climate-related scenarios applied to insurers and other financial institutions climate risk task force, Technical Report. International Actuarial Association

Nogueira FG, Lucena AFP, Nogueira R (2018) Sustainable insurance assessment: towards an integrative model. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 43(2):275–299

Nowak P, Romaniuk M (2013) Pricing and simulations of catastrophe bonds. Insur Math Econ 52(1):18–28

Owadally I, Mwizere J-R, Kalidas N, Murugesu K, Kashif M (2021) Long-term sustainable investment for retirement. Sustainability 13(9):5000

Pagano AJ, Feofilovs M, Romagnoli F (2018) The relationship between insurance companies and natural disaster risk reduction: overview of the key characteristics and mechanisms dealing with climate change. Energy Procedia 147:566–572

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 71

Paudel Y (2012) A comparative study of public-private catastrophe insurance systems: lessons from current practices. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 37(2):257–285

Pfeifer D (2021) The European way to sustainable insurance—the ESG challenge

Phelan L (2011) Managing climate risk: extreme weather events and the future of insurance in a climate-changed world. Australas J Environ Manag 18(4):223–232

Pierro R, Desai B (2008) Climate insurance for the poor: challenges for targeting and participation. IDS Bull 39(4):123–129

Pörtner H-O, Roberts DC, Tignor MM, Poloczanska E, Mintenbeck K, Alegría A, Craig M, Langsdorf S, Löschke S, Möller V, Okem A, Rama B (2022) Climate change 2022—impacts. adaptation and vulnerability—summary for policymakers. IPCC

Pranugrahaning A, Donovan JD, Topple C, Masli EK (2021) Corporate sustainability assessments: a systematic literature review and conceptual framework. J Clean Prod 295

Qing W, Liang L (2010) The strategy of Chinese insurance industry to address global climate change. In: Proceedings of the 2010 international symposium on low-carbon economy and technology science, vol 8, no 2, p 219

Rempel A, Gupta J (2020) Conflicting commitments? Examining pension funds, fossil fuel assets and climate policy in the organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD). Energy Res Soc Sci 69

Risi D (2020) Time and business sustainability: socially responsible investing in swiss banks and insurance companies. Bus Soc 59(7):1410–1440

Sato M, Seki M (2010) Sustainable business. Sustainable planet a Japanese insurance perspective. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 35(2):325–335

SBTi (2021) SBTi corporate manual

Schanz K-U (2022) The role of insurance in promoting social sustainability, Technical Report. The Geneva Association

Schiller F, Crugnola-Humbert J (2022) The only constant is change: opportunities and challenges for actuaries in a changing world. Eur Actuar J 12(2):887–894

Article   MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

Scholtens B (2011) Corporate social responsibility in the international insurance industry. Sustain Dev 19(2):143–156

Sethi SP (2005) Investing in socially responsible companies is a must for public pension funds—because there is no better alternative. J Bus Ethics 56(2):99–129

Sievänen R, Rita H, Scholtens B (2017) European pension funds and sustainable development: trade-offs between finance and responsibility. Bus Strategy Environ 26(7):912–926

Stahel WR (2008) Global climate change in the wider context of sustainability. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 33(3):507–529

Stechemesser K, Endrikat J, Grasshoff N, Guenther E (2015) Insurance companies’ responses to climate change: adaptation. Dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 40(4):557–584

Stricker L, Pugnetti C, Wagner J, Zeier Röschmann A (2022) Green insurance: a roadmap for executive management. J Risk Financ Manag 15(5):221

Swiss Insurance Association (2021) Affordable natural perils insurance thanks to the ES pool

Swiss Re (2021) Remote sensing innovation: progressing sustainability goals and expanding insurability, Technical Report

Swiss Re (2022) Reshaping the social contract: the role of insurance in reducing income inequality. Sigma (3)

Thirawat N, Udompol S, Ponjan P (2017) Disaster risk reduction and international catastrophe risk insurance facility. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 22(7):1021–1039

UNEP Finance Initiative (2012) PSI principles for sustainable insurance

UNEP Finance Initiative (2020) Managing environmental. social and governance risks in non-life insurance business, Technical Report. Principles for Sustainable Insurance

UNEP Finance Initiative (2021) PRI strategic plan 2021–24: building a bridge between financial risk, opportunities and real-world outcomes

UNEP Finance Initiative (2021) The net-zero insurance alliance

UNEP Finance Initiative (2022) Insuring the net-zero transition: evolving thinking and practices, Technical Report, April. Principles for Sustainable Insurance

UNEP Finance Initiative (2022) Managing environmental, social and governance risks in life and health insurance business, Technical Report. Principles for Sustainable Insurance

UNEP Finance Initiative (2022) New risks, new opportunities: harnessing environmental pollution liability insurance for a sustainable economy, Technical Report. Principles for Sustainable Insurance

United Nations (2015) The millennium development goals report

Vasseur E (1973) United Nations conference on the human environment. Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972. Water Res 7(8):1227–1233

Ward RE, Herweijer C, Patmore N, Muir-Wood R (2008) The role of insurers in promoting adaptation to the impacts of climate change. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 33(1):133–139

Wason S, Desxter N, Furlan T, Milijkovic DT, Shier P (2020) Importance of climate-related risks for actuaries, Technical Report. International Actuarial Association

Wilkins M (2010) The need for a multi-level approach to climate change—an Australian insurance perspective. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 35(2):336–348

Wong C, Erika P (2020) Rate the raters 2020: investor survey and interview results

Woods C, Urwin R (2010) Putting sustainable investing into practice: a governance framework for pension funds. J Bus Ethics 92:1–19

Download references

Open access funding provided by University of Lausanne.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Actuarial Science, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

Laura Iveth Aburto Barrera & Joël Wagner

Swiss Finance Institute, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

Joël Wagner

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joël Wagner .

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

See Tables  7 and 8 .

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Aburto Barrera, L.I., Wagner, J. A systematic literature review on sustainability issues along the value chain in insurance companies and pension funds. Eur. Actuar. J. 13 , 653–701 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-023-00349-1

Download citation

Received : 05 October 2022

Revised : 08 February 2023

Accepted : 11 April 2023

Published : 10 May 2023

Issue Date : December 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-023-00349-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Sustainability
• Insurance companies
• Pension funds
• Value chain
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Search form

A systematic review of esg in the insurance industry: navigating the path to sustainability.

© 2024 The authors. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).

OPEN ACCESS

This paper aims to find out the benefits of ESG in the insurance sector for achieving sustainability. The authors conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) to find and evaluate the ESG in the insurance industry using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method. Integrating ESG and sustainable insurance is a potential new revenue stream for the insurance sector. All business operations of insurers and pension funds will be impacted by ESG factors and sustainable insurance, with investment activity, risk management, product management, and the valuation of assets and liabilities having the most effects. It has been noted from the body of literature that very few researches using the PRISMA and SLR approaches have been carried out in this area. The authors also conducted a comprehensive study that focuses on three separate topics: ESG and sustainability, ESG impact in the insurance industry, and ESG and insurance.

ESG, insurance, sustainability, PRISMA, systematic literature review

The insurance industry is a cornerstone of modern economies, providing individuals and businesses with financial protection against various risks. Over the years, this sector has undergone significant transformations, adapting to changing market dynamics, regulatory environments, and consumer preferences. One of the most notable developments in recent years has been integrating Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles into the insurance industry [1, 2]. It includes many elements beyond financial measures, such as social responsibility, corporate governance, and environmental sustainability. Across industries, this all-encompassing method of assessing company practices has gained traction as insurance firms increasingly acknowledge its importance [3]. Sustainability, social responsibility, and governance (ESG) issues are a major factor driving transformation in the insurance sector. Insurers are now aware of the critical role they can play in advancing sustainability and social responsibility, and they are no longer satisfied with merely managing risk. The realisation that traditional risk assessment is inadequate in a world dealing with social injustice, climate change, and changing governance practices is at the core of this shift. Incorporating ESG criteria provides insurers with a more comprehensive understanding of potential risks. Consider an insurance policy that offers a cheaper price to a plant that does not pollute the environment, or that offers better terms to a business that has strong cybersecurity procedures. This makes it possible to price risks more precisely while simultaneously encouraging sustainable activities.  Incorporating ESG also helps insurers meet the increasing demand for ethical investing. Investors of today are becoming pickier, directing their money towards businesses that uphold ESG standards. Insurers become more appealing to these investors by showcasing a dedication to sustainability in their investing methods, guaranteeing a secure financial future. The advantages go beyond only financial gains. Policyholders are looking for insurance policies that align with their values as they become more socially and environmentally conscious. Insurers can meet this need by creating cutting-edge products, such as providing coverage for risks associated with climate change that homes confront or cyberattacks that target companies with inadequate data protection.

Sustainable finance and ESG concepts are familiar; they have been discussed for over 20 years [4, 5]. What makes today's discussion unique is that it has progressed to the point where a fundamental regulatory framework will be created, based on which the Paris Agreement on Climate Change and the climate change targets of the United Nations Sustainable Development Programme will be pursued in the years leading up to 2030. Over the past four years (2015-2019), specific initiatives have been taken in the EU to create rules that will serve as the foundation for incorporating ESG principles into the operations of financial institutions [6]. ESG (environmental, social, and governance) factors have grown significantly within the insurance sector in recent years. ESG refers to a collection of standards businesses and investors use to assess a company's overall governance practices and impact on the environment and society [7]. These standards are also used in the insurance industry and will significantly impact how the sector develops in the future [8].

There are three components of ESG [9]: 1. Environmental (E): This component focuses on the environmental impact of a corporation. It entails evaluating a company's initiatives to lessen its carbon footprint, sustainably manage natural resources, and eliminate environmental risks. Calls for assessing the climate-related risks to which insurance products and portfolios are subject [10], 2. Social (S): The social component of ESG considers a company's ties to its workers, clients, communities, and the larger society. Consumers increasingly expect insurance companies to promote ethical behavior, exhibit diversity and inclusion in their workforces, and give back to the communities where they do business. 3. Governance (G): A firm's management and governance are controlled by governance principles. It entails assessing the organization's board composition, executive compensation, openness, and general corporate governance practices. Strong governance in the insurance sector guarantees that policyholders are treated fairly, and risks are effectively managed [11]. The Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors are becoming more and more critical for the success and dependability of many firms, to the point where ESG analysis is now seen as an ad-hoc non-financial assessment with its own unique and growing relevance to have the scanning and valuation of corporate assets, and to check the extent to which the company complies with the peculiar normative and reputational needs.

As a result, the economy may be significantly impacted by the insurance industry's approach to sustainability [12]. The insurance industry, which oversees substantial investment amounts, has the potential to play a vital role in pushing the entire financial sector in the direction of a far more sustainable imprint.

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations are being incorporated into insurance company operations. This is taking into account variables such as an organization's social responsibility or environmental policies when evaluating risk. The integration of ESG data into current systems and maintaining uniform data collection practices between businesses present challenges. By overcoming these obstacles, a more thorough risk assessment is possible, and clients who care about the environment and society are drawn in. Important aspects to take into account for insurers aiming to effectively operationalize ESG include regulation and the long-term effects of things like climate change. Top insurance players are strategically positioned through several ESG-related initiatives, including medium-term goals, institutional communication, and management training. Italy's companies are increasingly committed to creating plans to incorporate ESG themes into their core businesses, to unusual sustainability-related initiatives and particular business management and market offer (insurance products and protection tools more generally) actions [13].

The research articles on the impact of the ESG directive on the insurance sector were reviewed as part of this study's systematic literature review method. The systematic approach, used to examine the literature on specific topics, can cover the entire body of literature pertinent to the field of study and explain how it works [14]. This study has included the "Systematic Literature Review" methodology. The best method to use when assessing the body of literature on a particular topic is a systematic literature review (SLR) [15-17]. The systematic review method can be divided into eight (08) steps [18], as described in the literature and shown in Figure 1.

2.1 Sample selection

Numerous searches in electronic databases were carried out to find the earlier studies that had been done in the insurance field. All studies conducted in the domain of ESG in the insurance industry make up the population. As a result, the following reputable electronic databases were searched for the analyses: Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO, Emerald Insight, Oxford University Press, Taylor & Francis Group, JSTOR, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and conference papers and including grey literature (Appendix Table 2) and other unpublished literature in systematic reviews. These databases were chosen for the two main reasons mentioned below.

These are the top fifteen (15) journal publishers worldwide, which is the initial reason for this. The second reason is that replicate research studies are not published in these data banks, which only contain high-quality research publications. The searches in the above electronic databases used the term “ESG and Insurance sector." Further, only the peer-reviewed "Journal Articles" published in ESG directives in the insurance sector were considered for the sample selection.

Figure 1. Systematic review process

Source: [18]

Figure 2. Sample selection process

Source: Author Compilation

Five steps were used in the sample selection process (Figure 2). The search term "ESG in the Insurance sector" was used for the initial investigation. Based on the period, the following screening was performed. This analysis took into account the years 2013 through 2023. This time frame was chosen to examine the recent publications in this field. The search using the "field" was conducted after this. Under advanced search options, this search option is accessible. The screening results from steps one and two included numerous studies that needed to be more pertinent to the study under consideration. The screening for the abstract, title, or whole texts that contained these relevant studies was done in step three of the procedure. Step four only considered the research articles to which the authors had access. The studies that neared step four were then further examined to determine their applicability to the current investigation. The scope of the study did not include any trials that approached step 4. As a result, those studies were taken out of the sample. The sample selected through the above steps is thirty-five (35) research articles. The number of studies that were generated as a result of filtering via each of those above first four processes and the final sample that was chosen for each electronic data source are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Sample composition

2.2 Prisma model

This study demonstrates how the minimum collection of topics to be studied in this systematic review was chosen using the PRISMA methodology. The graph below (Figure 3) shows the PRISMA Flow diagram created for this inquiry.

Figure 3. Sample characteristic (year of publication)

This section analyses the studies that met the eligibility requirements. To achieve the current study's goal, a thorough analysis of the findings from each study in the sample has been carried out under this section.

3.1 Sample composition

The chosen studies were divided into three (03) core categories for precise analysis.

ESG and Insurance

ESG impact on the Insurance sector

ESG and Sustainability

35 articles from each of the three categories of ESG and insurance. Fifteen (15) articles are accessible on ESG and Insurance, twelve (12) articles on ESG impact in the Insurance industry, and eight (8) articles on ESG and Sustainability.

3.2 Sample characteristics

There are 35 participants in the study's sample (Appendix Table 3). The features of the sample were analyzed about three variables: Region, Year of publication, and Data collection method. Studies from the eleven period beginning in 2013 and ending in 2023 were used for this study. The year 2023 has seen the most publication activity out of the sample's 35 studies, with ten (10) studies published there. The years 2015, 2017, and 2019 have the lowest number of publications, which is one (01). The number of journals published during each year of the study's consideration period is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 4. Sample characteristics (region wise)

Figure 5. Sample characteristics (data collection method)

The sample comprises research from the entire world and studies from Asia, Europe, and America. The majority of the sampled studies are based in the continent of Europe. It represents 31% of the total. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the research by geographic region.

The data-collecting method is the third attribute examined in the sample analysis. In light of this, the sample was split into two groups: studies that used primary data gathering methods and studies that used secondary data collection methods. Of the sample's thirty-five (35) studies, 2 (two) were based on primary data collection methods. The secondary data gathering method was used in 33 (Thirty-two) studies shown in Figure 5. In contrast, surveys and interviews were used as the primary data collection methods in studies that have used it. Surveys and interviews have been combined as the main data-gathering methods in studies that use them.

3. 3 Prisma model (Figure 6)

Fig ure 6. Prisma model

3.4 ESG and insurance

One of the main focuses of the research under ESG in the insurance industry is "ESG and insurance industry." Fifteen (15) studies were focused on ESG and the insurance industry. As the second-largest asset owner behind pension funds, insurance companies are anticipated to be a key player in the shift to a greener economy [19]. They can influence change through ethical operations and asset management. Still, they can encourage other companies and people by considering environmental, social, and governmental (ESG) aspects when underwriting. Insurance clients are at diverse stages of ESG maturity due to regulatory forces in various jurisdictions [20].

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors demand more than just completing the minimum disclosure standards, according to a study [21] that focuses on the importance of ESG in the insurance business. Forward-thinking insurers are developing ESG strategies to include in every aspect of their business. The increasing demand for a clear position on how significant action will be taken, measured, and reported from insurance consumers, investors, boards, staff, and other ecosystem stakeholders adds to the pressure. Integrating an organization's mission, ESG initiatives, and business strategy results in successful value creation [22].

The ESG profile is created by combining the firm's level of ESG awareness, the method(s) by which the firm is integrating the ESG, and the firm's philosophy on ESG integration. The knowledge, preparedness, and potential of insurance firms in producing sustainable insurance are explored and examined in this study as indicators of sustainable insurance development in Indonesia [23].

Another author's empirical findings indicate the safest businesses supporting investment diversification and distinct relationships typical of tail contagion providers and receivers. The role of ESG Scores is then considered through (non-ESG related) assets, offering institutional investors and other financial market participants additional insights to develop better data-driven, actionable investment decisions and regulatory regulations [24].

In addition to those mentioned above, the research authors also present a paradigm for integrating ESG into benchmarks at different strategic levels, from the highest-level policy benchmark to the performance benchmark of individual allocations. They also emphasize the range of investing goals asset owners can pursue when integrating ESG and how they might reflect those goals using ESG benchmarks. Since benchmarks are used to define the underlying investable universe and serve as a performance yardstick across all asset management disciplines, including index-based, factor-based, and active management, as well as at various strategic levels, they find that incorporating ESG into benchmarks makes sense as a framework to achieve consistency [25].

A study by Apicella et al. [26] used a rigorous theoretical valuation framework for ESG reputation, which we define as the reputation or the increase in confidence brought about by having a good reputation as opposed to not having one when the ESG criteria are taken into account in the business analysis. The author uses explicitly behavioral finance models to model ESG reputational risk. The definition of the ESG reputational risk is based on subjective probabilities that are presented in a probability function based on the preferences of the possible trustees, such as actors or things that people might want to put their faith in. Calculating the sustainability premium or discount assesses the financial impact of an ESG investment's favorable or unfavorable reputation [26].

In Conclusion, the papers suggest that ESG factors influence the insurance sector in various ways, from risk analysis and underwriting to investment plans and client interactions. Insurance businesses are better equipped to negotiate the shifting environment of risks and possibilities in a changing world if they include ESG concepts in their business practices. The study highlights the crucial role of the insurance industries in accepting and transmitting changes related to sustainable development, including climate risk, and the need for the insurance industry to integrate ESG factors into underwriting activities and manage sustainability issues effectively.

3.5 ESG impact in the insurance sector

The environment for the insurance sector is evolving as environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations assume more significance. Stakeholders are pressuring insurers to address ESG risks as they grow in number and severity. ESG factors have a variety of effects on the insurance sector. For instance, climate change is making natural disasters more frequent and severe, which could result in more significant claims expenses. Social hazards like inequality and demographic change can also impact the demand for insurance goods and services.

Additionally, governance risks like fraud and corruption can jeopardize the financial viability of insurance. Insurers are progressively incorporating ESG into their operational procedures to address these issues. ESG-friendly products and services must be created, ESG risks must be evaluated and managed, and sustainable asset investments must be made. To improve their underwriting decisions, insurers are increasingly using ESG data. For instance, insurers might be more inclined to approve business plans for enterprises making efforts to lessen their environmental impact. Although the adoption of ESG in the insurance sector is still in its infancy, it has a significant influence. The shift to a more sustainable economy will benefit insurers on the cutting edge of ESG. Insurance businesses have been impacted by it because it offers risk reduction, cost reduction, etc. It is advised that the insurance industry in developing nations adopt ESG practices to be used globally, and small and midcap enterprises can also profit from them [27, 28].

ESG factors are increasingly impacting the insurance industry, affecting all aspects of the business. Insurers are integrating ESG into their underwriting, investment, customer engagement, and regulatory strategies.

Underwriting decisions are being made based on ESG performance, ESG data is being used to assess risks, and unsustainable assets are being diverted. ESG-themed products and services are being offered, and customers are being educated about ESG risks. Regulators also require insurers to disclose their ESG performance and encourage them to invest in sustainable assets and develop ESG-friendly products and services.

The overall implications of ESG for the insurance industry are significant. Insurers who fail to integrate ESG into their business practices face higher costs, more significant risks, and losing customers. Insurers ahead of the curve on ESG are well-positioned to benefit from the transition to a more sustainable economy.

3.6 ESG and sustainability

ESG and sustainability are closely related concepts [29]. ESG stands for environmental, social, and governance. At the same time, sustainability refers to the ability to meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs [30].

ESG factors can have a significant impact on sustainability. For example, climate change is an essential environmental risk, and social inequality can lead to social unrest [10]. Good governance is critical for ensuring that resources are used sustainably.

ESG integration can help businesses to become more sustainable. For example, by investing in renewable energy and reducing their environmental impact, companies can reduce their carbon footprint and mitigate climate change risks. Businesses can create a more equitable and sustainable workforce by promoting diversity and inclusion. By implementing good governance practices, companies can ensure they use resources responsibly and ethically. There is a growing demand for sustainable products [31] and services from consumers and investors [32]. Businesses demonstrating their ESG performance are well-positioned to meet this demand and achieve long-term success.

Businesses committed to ESG and sustainability are better positioned to succeed long-term. By addressing ESG risks and investing in sustainable practices, companies can reduce costs, improve their reputation, and attract and retain top talent.

AlQubaisi and Nobanee [33] show that the link between the three sustainability scores (environmental, social, and governance) and insurance business stability was used to quantify the impact of sustainability. The effect of sustainability was evaluated by looking at the relationship between the strength of the insurance industry and the three sustainability scores (environmental, social, and governance).

The author discusses the problems of figuring out how insurance companies might manage their sustainable development using an ESG-driven approach. The Company ESG Risk Ratings (Sustainalytics) is the most appropriate rating for determining whether insurance companies can apply an ESG-driven approach to managing their sustainable development, according to the results of a comparison analysis of six ESG Ratings according to four main criteria (dependent variables, independent variables, scale type, sample) [34].

Scordis et al. [35] found that the recently adopted Principles for Sustainable Insurance (PSI) are being aggressively pursued by some of the biggest insurers in the world. Although a governance structure that prioritizes stakeholder value is frequently related to the concept of sustainability, the PSI does not seem to be an appeal for insurers who prioritize stakeholder interests. The PSI is about internalizing covert claims in insurers' business practices. According to conceptual and empirical research on maximizing shareholder value, the value to shareholders improves when an insurer honors its implicit claims. According to tradition and practice, the earnest pursuit of the PSI will broaden the scope of corporate risk management, which is a fundamental insight.

Determine whether ESG scores indicate an insurer's financial strength and market success because the expanding ESG issues across all economic sectors represent significant problems for insurance companies. Overall, the relevance of sustainable insurers for converting the entire economy to ESG should always be considered when making changes to the taxes of insurance businesses.

Sustainability indeed refers to constant welfare, ideally increasing, as well as the possibility of leaving behind a standard of living that is at least comparable to what it appears to be now. The level of occupancy of individuals is taken into account from three essential perspectives: governance, social issues, and the environment. Sustainability is thus no longer just an ethical issue; it has also emerged as a crucial economic aspect, making it a goal for all businesses, regardless of size. It has also emerged as a factor that helps companies to become more competitive and stand out in the market. Consumers, investors, and operators, among others, drive the market's demand that companies adopt sustainability practices. Sustainability is a differentiator in consumer purchasing decisions, investment, and financing.

The importance of insurance companies as crucial medium- to long-term institutional investors and as physiological and structural "wealth and protection providers" is on the rise. Therefore, the insurance industry already plays a significant role in sustainable financing [36]. Customer preferences do include ESG policies. Banks, insurers, pension funds, and investment companies will increasingly integrate sustainable financing into operational procedures. ESG and sustainable insurance integration are seen as a potential new source of income for the insurance industry [6]. ESG considerations and sustainable insurance will impact all business operations of insurers and pension funds, with investment activity, risk management, product management, and the valuation of assets and liabilities having the most impact. In Conclusion, insurers and pension funds must incorporate ESG concepts into their operational procedures.

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations are leading the way in the insurance industry's transformation. But how can insurers make their way through this new environment and incorporate ESG into their operations? This essay provides practitioners with practical steps to adopt sustainability and realise the full potential of ESG.

Recognising the value of ESG in risk assessment is the first step. Conventional approaches may ignore important details. An example of a factory with inadequate environmental procedures is one that is more vulnerable to climate-related disasters, which increases insurance risk. Insurers may provide a more accurate price and a more comprehensive picture of potential risks by adding ESG data. This helps the financial line of the organisation and encourages others to use sustainable business methods.

Secondly, integrating ESG aligns your investment strategy with the growing demand for responsible investing.  Investors are increasingly selective, channelling funds towards companies committed to ESG principles. By demonstrating your commitment to sustainability through your investment choices, you become more attractive to these investors, ensuring a stable financial future for your company.

Meeting the increasing demand for ESG-aware products is the next stage. Customers are looking for insurance that aligns with their values as they become more socially and environmentally concerned. Create cutting-edge solutions such as cyber insurance for companies with strong cybersecurity or risk coverage connected to climate change for homes. These goods encourage companies to give environmental sustainability a higher priority by drawing in eco-aware consumers.

ESG integration is not without its difficulties, though. Data may be inconsistent and dispersed. Establish standardised procedures for gathering and reporting ESG data by working with data providers and prominent members of the industry. By doing this, the accuracy of the data needed to evaluate risk and make investment decisions is guaranteed.

Lastly, dedicate yourself to continuous education. New approaches are continually emerging as the field of ESG analysis continues to evolve. Invest in educating your employees about risk assessment and ESG factors. This gives your team the ability to decide using the most recent facts and techniques.

Insurance professionals can lead towards a more sustainable future by taking these steps. Including ESG means more than just being environmentally conscious—it means building a more prosperous and secure future for the insurance sector as a whole. Accept the shift, and establish yourself as a sustainability leader, and help your insurance business achieve the full benefits of ESG.

In the study "ESG in the Insurance Industry: Navigating the Path to Sustainability," the expanding significance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations in the insurance sector is examined.

6.1 Theoretical implication

Extending Risk Assessment Frameworks: The study advances the theory of sustainable insurance practices by highlighting the limitations of approaches used to analyse ESG data in the context of insurance risk assessment. This closes a critical gap in current ESG research and expands the scope of risk analysis beyond traditional financial considerations to a more holistic approach.

Sustainable Insurance Practices: The study shows the potential of ESG for risk management and investment strategies, suggesting that integrating ESG can benefit both insurers and society at large.

Methodological Challenges in ESG Data Analysis: The paper identifies a critical gap in current ESG research by highlighting the limitations of methodologies used to analyze ESG data in the context of insurance risk assessment. This opens new avenues for research on developing robust methodologies for effective ESG analysis.

6.2 Practical implication

Improved Risk Management: For insurance companies, the paper offers practical guidance on incorporating ESG factors into risk assessment processes. This can lead to more accurate risk pricing, improved underwriting decisions, and ultimately, better financial performance.

Development of ESG-based Insurance Products: By identifying the growing demand for ESG-conscious products, the paper encourages insurers to develop innovative products that cater to this demand. Examples include climate-related risk coverage or cyber insurance for businesses with strong data security practices.

Collaboration for Data Standardization: The paper emphasizes the need for collaboration between insurers, data providers, and regulators. This collaboration can lead to standardized ESG data collection and reporting practices, improving the reliability and consistency of ESG data used by insurers.

Investment Strategies Aligned with Sustainability: The paper highlights the alignment between ESG integration and responsible investment strategies. This can guide insurers in making investment decisions that promote sustainability while ensuring a healthy financial future.

There are many difficulties in operationalizing ESG in the insurance industry, especially when it comes to data limits. ESG data may not be standardised across sources and may be unreliable and fragmented. Conclusions that may affect the result of this discrepancy's erroneous risk estimates.

Data Quality and Availability: The range of analysis may be limited by the scarcity of high-quality ESG data. Businesses might not provide ESG measures on a regular basis, or the data they report could be inaccurate. This can impede efficient risk management and result in biased findings.

Inconsistent Metrics and Definitions: It is challenging to make comparisons between industries because ESG metrics are not standardised. For instance, depending on the industry, "environmental sustainability" may mean different things. This discrepancy may cause evaluations of a company's actual ESG performance to be erroneous.

Limitations in Data Analysis Methodologies: As of right now, there isn't a single, widely recognised technique for evaluating ESG data in relation to insurance risk assessment. The methods selected can have a big impact on the findings and recommendations made.

Kiran Sood: Postdoc Researcher, University of Uşak, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Department of Finance and Banking, 64200 Uşak, Turkiye.

Ercan Özen: Supervisor, University of Uşak, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Department of Finance and Banking, 64200 Uşak, Turkiye.

This paper is derived from Postdoc research under supervision of Prof. Dr. Ercan Özen, who is member of Usak University, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Department of Finance and Banking, Uşak, Turkiye.

Appendix Table 2. Grey literature detail

Appendix Table 2. Literature review

[1] Shalender, K., Singla, B., Sharma, S. (2023). Adoption of ESG by the insurance industry: Conceptual framework and future recommendations. In the Impact of Climate Change and Sustainability Standards on the Insurance Market (1st ed). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394167944.ch22 [2] Saraçlı, S., Tunca, B., Gül, I., Arı, E., Villi, B., Berk, B.I., Berk, I., Boca, G.D. (2023). Modeling the influences on sustainable attitudes of students towards environmental challenges: A partial least squares-structural equation modelling approach. Opportunities and Challenges in Sustainability, 2(3): 161-171. https://doi.org/10.56578/ocs020305 [3] Celik, I.E. (2023). Impact of sustainability reporting on financial performance. Opportunities and Challenges in Sustainability, 2(1): 23-29. https://doi.org/10.56578/ocs020103 [4] Migliorelli, M. (2021). What do we mean by sustainable finance? Assessing existing frameworks and policy risks. Sustainability, 13(2): 975. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020975 [5] Ziolo, M., Filipiak, B.Z., Bąk, I., Cheba, K. (2019). How to design more sustainable financial systems: The roles of environmental, social, and governance factors in the decision-making process. Sustainability, 11(20): 5604. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205604 [6] Dimitrov, S. (2020). Integration of environmental, social and governance principles in pension funds and insurance companies activities. VUZF Review, 5(3): 31-39. https://doi.org/10.38188/2534-9228.20.3.04 [7] Tarmuji, I., Maelah, R., Tarmuji, N.H. (2016). The impact of environmental, social and governance practices (ESG) on economic performance: Evidence from ESG score. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 7(3): 67. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijtef.2016.7.3.501 [8] Arslan, M., Kekeç, H.M. (2023). Health financing in the pursuit of sustainable development goals: An examination of global averages and Turkey's position. Opportunities and Challenges in Sustainability, 2(3): 141-147. https://doi.org/10.56578/ocs020303 [9] Limkriangkrai, M., Koh, S., Durand, R.B. (2017). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) profiles, stock returns, and financial policy: Australian evidence: ESG profiles, returns, and financial policy. International Review of Finance, 17(3): 461-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12101 [10] Kumar, S., Raheja, K., Dhiraj, A. (2023). Environment education and insurance awareness - A boon to indian insurance sector. In the Impact of Climate Change and Sustainability Standards on the Insurance Market (1st ed). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394167944.ch20 [11] Najjar, N. (2013). The impact of corporate governance on the insurance firm’s Performance in Bahrain. International Journal of Learning and Development, 2(2): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v2i2.1412 [12] Almajali, A.Y., Alamro, S.A., Al-Soub, Y.Z. (2012). Factors affecting the financial performance of Jordanian insurance companies listed at Amman Stock Exchange. Journal of Management Research, 4(2): 266-289. https://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v4i2.1482 [13] Santamaria, R., Paolone, F., Cucari, N., Dezi, L. (2021). Non-financial strategy disclosure and environmental, social and governance score: Insight from a configurational approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4): 1993-2007. http://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2728 [14] Fink, A. (2019). Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. Sage Publications.  [15] Bressan, S. (2023b). ESG, Taxes, and Profitability of Insurers. [16] Dimson, E., Marsh, P., Staunton, M. (2020). Divergent ESG ratings. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 47(1): 75-87. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.55949 [17] Raggi, E., Paglicci, E. (2015). Healthcare and Insurance Companies: How ESG Scorecards can be a Sustainable Solution for Both.  [18] Kayani, U.N., De Silva, T.A., Gan, C. (2019). A systematic literature review on working capital management-An identification of new avenues. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 11(3): 352-366. http://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-05-2018-0062 [19] Mills, E. (2009). A global review of insurance industry responses to climate change. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 34(3): 323-359. https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2009.14 [20] Van Roosebeke, B., Defina, R. (2023). ESG and Deposit Insurance: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead.  [21] Sridharan, V. (2018). Bridging the disclosure gap: Investor perspectives on environmental, social & governance (ESG) disclosures. Social & Governance (ESG) Disclosures. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3180412 [22] Sood, S., Bak, C. (2023). The insurance industry’s path to ESG impact. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/ca/Documents/financial-services/EN_FSI_Insurance_ESG_POV_V6_AODA.pdf. [23] Maftuchah, I. (2018). Corporate ESG profile on performance: Evidence from Indonesian insurance industry. http://repository.crmsindonesia.org/handle/123456789/216. [24] Fianu, E.S. (2021). Understanding environmental, social and governance (ESG) Contributions in the downside systematic and systemic risk measurement of the insurance sector. Social and Governance (ESG) Contributions in the Downside Systematic and Systemic Risk Measurement of the Insurance Sector (November 30, 2021). [25] Giese, G., Lee, L.E., Melas, D., Nagy, Z., Nishikawa, L. (2019). Consistent ESG through ESG Benchmarks. The Journal of Beta Investment Strategies. https://jii.pm-research.com/content/early/2019/07/27/jii.2019.1.072.full. [26] Apicella, G., Carannante, M., D’Amato, V. (2023). Policyholders’ Subjective Beliefs: Approaching New Drivers of Insurance ESG Reputational Risk.   [27] Singh, A., Bathla, G. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) measures and their impact on insurance industry: A Global Perspective. In the Impact of Climate Change and Sustainability Standards on the Insurance Market. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394167944.ch27 [28] Kaur, S., Kumar, R., Singh, K., Huang, Y.L. (2024). Leveraging artificial intelligence for enhanced sustainable energy management. Journal of Sustainability for Energy, 3(1): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.56578/jse030101 [29] Clément, A., Robinot, É., Trespeuch, L. (2022). Improving ESG scores with sustainability concepts. Sustainability, 14(20): 13154. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013154 [30] Chiaramonte, L., Dreassi, A., Paltrinieri, A., Piserà, S. (2020). Sustainability practices and stability in the insurance industry. Sustainability, 12(14): 5530. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145530 [31] Hoffman, A.J. (2018). The next phase of business sustainability. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 16(2): 34-39. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3191035 [32] Uzsoki, D. (2020). Sustainable investing. International Institute for Sustainable Development. IISD. [33] AlQubaisi, K., Nobanee, H. (2021). The impact of sustainability on performance of insurance companies.  [34] Khovrak, I. (2020). ESG-driven approach to managing insurance companies’ sustainable development. Insurance Markets and Companies, 11: 42-52. http://doi.org/10.21511/ins.11(1).2020.05 [35] Scordis, N.A., Suzawa, Y., Zwick, A., Ruckner, L. (2014). Principles for sustainable insurance: Risk management and value. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 17(2): 265-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/rmir.12024 [36] Sachs, J.D., Woo, W.T., Yoshino, N., Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2019). Importance of green finance for achieving sustainable development goals and energy security. Handbook of Green Finance: Energy Security and Sustainable Development, 10: 1-10.  [37] Das, S.C. (2013). Corporate social reporting and human resource disclosures: Experiences from insurance companies in India. Social Responsibility Journal, 9(1): 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111311307796 [38] Najjar, N.J., Salman, R.A.M. (2013). The impact of corporate governance on the insurance firm’s performance in Bahrain. International Journal of Learning and Development, 3(2): 56-69. http://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v3i2.3511 [39] Pasquini-Descomps, H., Sahut, J.M. (2013). ESG impact on a firm’s performance in Switzerland.  [40] Ashwin Kumar, N.C., Smith, C., Badis, L., Wang, N., Ambrosy, P., Tavares, R. (2016). ESG factors and risk-adjusted performance: A new quantitative model. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 6(4): 292-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2016.1234909 [41] UNEP, F. (2012). Principles for sustainable insurance. Geneva: UNEP FI. https://www.unepfi.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/EXTRANET-10-15-Butch-UNEP-FI-NA-members-meeting-PSI-Sep-2017-final.pdf. [42] Chen, H., Yao, M., Chong, D. (2019). Research on institutional innovation of China’s green insurance investment. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, 4(1): 1950003. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424862219500039 [43] Gatzert, N., Reichel, P., Zitzmann, A. (2020). Sustainability risks & opportunities in the insurance industry. Zeitschrift Für Die Gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, 109: 311-331. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12297-020-00482-w [44] Pfeifer, D. (2021). The European way to sustainable insurance-The ESG challenge. https://www.staff.uni-oldenburg.de/dietmar.pfeifer/KeyNote_Pfeifer_ASTIN_2021.pdf. [45] Hindkjaer, N.B., Slettan, A.M.N. (2020). The Insurance value of ESG performance: An event study of European banking scandals. https://research.cbs.dk/en/studentProjects/the-insurance-value-of-esg-performance-an-event-study-of-european. [46] Park, S.R., Jang, J.Y. (2021). The impact of ESG management on investment decision: Institutional investors’ perceptions of country-specific ESG criteria. International Journal of Financial Studies, 9(3): 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs9030048 [47] Kaur, H., Sood, K., Yadav, U.S., Grima, S. (2023). Sustainable solutions for insurance and risk management. In The Impact of Climate Change and Sustainability Standards on the Insurance Market, pp. 359-372. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394167944.ch23 [48] Xu, H., Zhao, J. (2022). Can directors’ and officers’ liability insurance improve corporate ESG performance? Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10: 949982. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.949982 [49] Huang, J., Lu, S. (2022). ESG Performance and Voluntary ESG Disclosure: Mind the (Gender Pay) Gap.  [50] Gatzert, N., Reichel, P. (2022). Sustainable investing in the US and European insurance industry: A text mining analysis. In the Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, pp. 1-37. [51] Brogi, M., Cappiello, A., Lagasio, V., Santoboni, F. (2022). Determinants of insurance companies’ environmental, social, and governance awareness. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5): 1357-1369. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2274 [52] Özer, G., Okur, N., Çam, İ. (2022). Determinants of becoming an M&A acquirer or target: Evidence from the US insurance industry. Journal of Capital Markets Studies, 6(2): 203-218. http://doi.org/10.1108/JCMS-04-2022-0014 [53] Tong, L. (2022). China catastrophe insurance: A boost to green insurance development under ESG concept. Academic Journal of Business & Management, 4(17): 11-19. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2022.041703 [54] Eisenkopf, J., Juranek, S., Walz, U. (2023). Responsible investment and stock market shocks: Short-term insurance without persistence. British Journal of Management, 34(3): 1420-1439. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12664 [55] Di Tommaso, C., Mazzuca, M. (2023). The stock price of European insurance companies: What is the role of ESG factors? Finance Research Letters, 56: 104071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104071 [56] Otavova, M., Glaserova, J., Kova, I.H. (2023). Social responsibility for insurance companies. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 19(2): 129-140. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2023.19-2.11 [57] Bressan, S. (2023). Effects from ESG Scores on P&C Insurance Companies. Sustainability, 15(16), 12644. [58] Tang, S., He, L., Su, F., Zhou, X. (2023). Does directors’ and officers’ liability insurance improve corporate ESG performance? Evidence from China. International Journal of Finance & Economics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2849 [59] Moalla, M., Dammak, S. (2023). Corporate ESG performance as good insurance in times of crisis: Lessons from US stock market during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Global Responsibility, 14(4): 381-402. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-07-2022-0061 [60] Li, R., Zhu, Z. (2023). Pension insurance contributions and ESG performance: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 55: 103940.

Phone: + 1 825 436 9306

Email: [email protected]

Subscription

Language support

Please sign up to receive notifications on new issues and newsletters from IIETA

Select Journal/Journals:

Copyright © 2024 IIETA. All Rights Reserved.

Intangible Capital

Printed Edition

SJR (Scopus)

CiteScore Rank (Scopus)

Web of Science

See more: Web of Science, Latindex...

• For Readers
• For Authors
• For Librarians
• Submissions
• Publication fee
• Indexing & Statistics

A systematic literature review: ESG criteria implementation in the Insurance industry

Purpose: Sustainability and ESG criteria are gaining more and more relevance, and the insurance industry is playing a relevant role in the sustainability transition. Therefore, this study aims to review existing academic literature on ESG criteria in the insurance industry. Specifically, it addresses the determinants in three objectives: First, analysing the focus on sustainability considering the three dimensions of the ESG framework: environment, social and governance; the second one, focusing on the relevant topics in the insurance industry involving the ESG criteria. And finally, identifying the main gaps and point out new research lines.

Design/methodology: The research was conducted through a systematic literature review considering published articles of Web of Science and Scopus.

Originality/value: Although the insurance industry has a very relevant weight into the economy and the society, and it plays a key role in promoting the transition to a low-carbon economy, we noticed that there are not many scientific articles on this subject.

Findings: Findings contribute to the body of literature on sustainable finance, providing a new and complete overview about how ESG criteria implementation has been approached in the insurance industry: mapping research streams, analysing the ESG approach, and identifying research gaps in this domain.

Practical implications: This article wants to provide a broader and a more structured knowledge about ESG criteria implementation, and to help managers and insurance companies to move forward with sustainability strategies, and to identify the future lines of research.

Social Implications: Business sustainability aims to combine market logic with social welfare logic, but we have found little activity on how insurance companies develop the social dimension within the ESG perspective, as a way to influence the community by promoting equal practices, access to education, etc.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Intangible Capital, 2004-2024

Online ISSN: 1697-9818; Print ISSN: 2014-3214; DL: B-33375-2004

Publisher: OmniaScience

Summary of regulatory developments: Updates for July 2024

This report reviews regulatory updates in July for life insurance companies in Europe. We note items published by the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA), European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), and Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA). Details include: 

• The ESAs establish framework to strengthen coordination in case of systemic cyber incidents
• EIOPA publishes amendments to facilitate cross-border cooperation among supervisors, and an opinion on the supervision of captive insurers
• FCA overhauls listing rules to boost growth and innovation on UK stock markets
• PRA publishes its approach to Life Insurance Stress Test (LIST) 2025

Explore more tags from this article

About the author(s), neil christy.

London Tel: 44 20 78471500

Isabel Stansfield

Monique mahabir.

We’re here to help you break through complex challenges and achieve next-level success.

Share this page

We review the latest noteworthy developments in the European life insurance industry from various regulatory agencies for July 2024.

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Integrating artificial intelligence into the supply chain in order to enhance sustainable production—a systematic literature review.

1. Introduction

• RQ1: What type of AI-based methods and tools, according to the concept of Industry 5.0, were dominant in literature regarding the integration of AI into the SC?
• RQ2: When do the most important effects of integrating the AI into the SC in the context of the improvement of the level of SP occur?
• RQ3: What are the future challenges and direction for integrating AI into the SC for an improvement in the level of SP according to the concept of Industry 5.0?

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. prisma study characteristics.

• Step 1: Defining the research objective.
• Step 2: Carrying out the search process using identified databases, ultimately defining the final search strings and exclusion criteria.
• Step 3: Conducting the analysis, after a comprehensive process of the analysis of the content of selected literature items.

2.2. Quantitative Analysis of Selected Literature Items

• to QR1: AI in SC, AI-based methods and SC, AI-based tools and SC;
• to QR2: effects of integrating AI in SC, integrating AI in SC;
• to QR3: AI in SC, the impact of AI in SC on the level of SP.

2.3. Assessment of the Full Version of Texts in Terms of Quality

• predictive maintenance, which reduces costs and saves time,
• production planning (orders), which increases efficiency and performance,
• customer relationships, which increases advancement.

4. Discussion

5. conclusions, supplementary materials, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest, appendix a. literature research results.

• Abirami Raja Santhi & Padmakumar Muthuswamy (2023), Industry 5.0 or industry 4.0S? Introduction to industry 4.0 and a peek into the prospective industry 5.0 technologies, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) Volume 17, pp. 947–979.
• Susana Garrido, Jorge Muniz Jr. Vagner Batista Ribeiro (2024), Operations Management, Sustainability & Industry 5.0: A critical analysis and future agenda, Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain .
• Moin Khan, Abid Haleem, Mohd Javaid (2023), Changes and improvements in Industry 5.0: A strategic approach to overcome the challenges of Industry 4.0, Green Technologies and Sustainability , Volume 1, Issue 2.
• Morteza Ghobakhloo, Mohammad Iranmanesh, Muhammad Faraz Mubarak (2022), Identifying industry 5.0 contributions to sustainable development: A strategy roadmap for delivering sustainability values, Sustainable Production and Consumption , Volume 33.
• Joaquín Ordieres-Meré, Miguel Gutierrez, Javier Villalba-Díez (2023), Toward the industry 5.0 paradigm: Increasing value creation through the robust integration of humans and machines, Computers in Industry , Volume 150.
• Weihua Liu, Yang He, Jingxin Dong &Yuenan Cao (2023), Disruptive technologies for advancing supply chain resilience, Frontiers of Engineering Management , Volume 10, pp. 360–366.
• Ying Li, Dakun Li, Yuyang Liu &Yongyi Shou (2023), Digitalization for supply chain resilience and robustness: The roles of collaboration and formal contracts, Frontiers of Engineering Management , Volume 10, pp. 5–19.
• Özge Albayrak Ünal, Burak Erkayman, Bilal Usanmaz (2023), Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Inventory Management: A Systematic Review of the Literature, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering , Volume 30, pp. 2605–2625.
• Stefan Walter (2023), AI impacts on supply chain performance: a manufacturing use case study, Discover Artificial Intelligence , Volume 3, 18.
• Bill Cope, Mary Kalantzis, (2022), Artificial intelligence in the long view: from mechanical intelligence to cyber-social systems, Discover Artificial Intelligence , Volume 2,13.
• Bukhoree Sahoh, Anant Choksuriwong (2023), The role of explainable Artificial Intelligence in high-stakes decision-making systems: a systematic review, Volume 14, pages 7827–7843, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing .
• Alim Al Ayub Ahmed, Arumugam Mahalakshmi, K. Arul Rajan, Joel Alanya-Beltran & Mohd (2023), Naved Integrated artificial intelligence effect on crisis management and lean production: structural equation modelling frame work, International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management , Volume 14, pp. 220–227.
• Anthony D. Scaife (2024), Improve predictive maintenance through the application of artificial intelligence: A systematic review, Results in Engineering , Volume 21.
• Mario Angos Mediavilla, Fabian Dietrich, Daniel Palm (2022), Review and analysis of artificial intelligence methods for demand forecasting in supply chain management, Procedia CIRP , Volume 107, pp. 1126–1131.
• Basim Aljabhan (2023), Economic strategic plans with supply chain risk management (SCRM) for organizational growth and development, Alexandria Engineering Journal , Volume 79, pp. 411–426.
• Mohsen Soori, Behrooz Arezoo, Roza Dastres (2023), Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in advanced robotics, a review, Cognitive Robotics , Volume 3, 2023, pp. 54–70.
• Subhajit Saha, Adel Fahad Alrasheedi, Md. Al-Amin Khan, Amalesh Kumar Manna (2023), Optimal strategies for green investment, sharing contract and advertisement effort in a supply chain coordination problem, Ain Shams Engineering Journal .
• Marek Pawlicki, Aleksandra Pawlicka, Rafał Kozik, Michał Choraś, Advanced insights through systematic analysis: Mapping future research directions and opportunities for xAI in deep learning and artificial intelligence used in cybersecurity, Neurocomputing, Volume 590, 2024, 127759, ISSN 0925-2312.
• István Mezgár, József Váncza (2022), From ethics to standards—A path via responsible AI to cyber-physical production systems, Annual Reviews in Control , Volume 53, pp. 391–404.
• Andrea Szalavetz (2022), The digitalisation of manufacturing and blurring industry boundaries, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology , Volume 37.
• Khlood Ahmad, Mohamed Abdelrazek, Chetan Arora, Arbind Agrahari Baniya, Muneera Bano, John Grundy (2023), Requirements engineering framework for human-centered artificial intelligence software systems, Applied Soft Computing , Volume 143.
• Gianclaudio Malgieri, Frank Pasquale (2024), Licensing high-risk artificial intelligence: Toward ex ante justification for a disruptive technology, Computer Law & Security Review , Volume 52.
• Juha Sipola, Minna Saunila, Juhani Ukko (2023), Adopting artificial intelligence in sustainable business, Journal of Cleaner Production , Volume 426.
• Kabita Das, Manaswini Pattanaik, SmitimayeeBasantia, Radhashyam Mishra, Debashreemayee Das, Kanhucharan Sahoo, BiswaranjanPaital (2023), Informatics on a social view and need of ethical interventions for wellbeing via interference of artificial intelligence, Telematics and Informatics Reports, Volume 11.
• Kiarash Sadeghi R., Divesh Ojha, Puneet Kaur, Raj V. Mahto, Amandeep Dhir (2024), Explainable artificial intelligence and agile decision-making in supply chain cyber resilience, Decision Support Systems , Volume 180.
• Morteza Ghobakhloo, Hannan AmoozadMahdiraji, Mohammad Iranmanesh& Vahid Jafari-Sadeghi, (2024), From Industry 4.0 Digital Manufacturing to Industry 5.0 Digital Society: a Roadmap Toward Human-Centric, Sustainable, and Resilient Production, Information Systems Frontiers .
• Sachin Modgil, Rohit Kumar Singh & Soni Agrawal (2023), Developing human capabilities for supply chains: an industry 5.0 perspective, Annals of Operations Research , 2023.
• Rahardjo, B., Wang, FK., Lo, SC. et al. (2023), A Sustainable Innovation Framework Based on Lean Six Sigma and Industry 5.0. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering .
• Jiménez-Partearroyo, M., Medina-López, A. & Juárez-Varón, D. (2023), Towards industry 5.0: evolving the product-process matrix in the new paradigm. The Journal of Technology Transfer .
• Agrawal, S., Agrawal, R., Kumar, A. et al. (2023), Can industry 5.0 technologies overcome supply chain disruptions?—a perspective study on pandemics, war, and climate change issues, Operations Management Research .
• Kazancoglu, Y., Mangla, S.K., Berberoglu, Y. et al. (2023), Towards Industry 5.0 Challenges for The Textile and Apparel Supply Chain for The Smart, Sustainable, and Collaborative Industry in Emerging Economies. Information Systems Frontiers .
• Rana, J., Daultani, Y. (2023), Mapping the Role and Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications in Supply Chain Digital Transformation: A Bibliometric Analysis. Operations Management Research 16, pp. 1641–1666.
• Jiewu Leng, Xiaofeng Zhu, Zhiqiang Huang, Xingyu Li, Pai Zheng, Xueliang Zhou, Dimitris Mourtzis, Baicun Wang, Qinglin Qi, Haidong Shao, Jiafu Wan, Xin Chen, Lihui Wang, Qiang Liu (2024), Unlocking the power of industrial artificial intelligence towards Industry 5.0: Insights, pathways, and challenges, Journal of Manufacturing Systems , Volume 73, pp. 349–363.
• Xiaowen Wang, Mingyue Chen, Nanxu Chen (2024), How artificial intelligence affects the labour force employment structure from the perspective of industrial structure optimisation, Heliyon , Volume 10, Issue 5.
• Marta Daroń, Monika Górska (2023) Enterprises development in context of artificial intelligence usage in main processes, Procedia Computer Science , Volume 225, pp. 2214–2223.
• Stefan Walter (2023), Impacts of AI driven manufacturing processes on supply chains: the contributions of the knowlEdge project, Transportation Research Procedia , Volume 72, pp. 3443–3449.
• Tazim Ahmed, Chitra Lekha Karmaker, Sumaiya Benta Nasir, Md. Abdul Moktadir, Sanjoy Kumar Paul (2023), Modeling the artificial intelligence-based imperatives of industry 5.0 towards resilient supply chains: A post-COVID-19 pandemic perspective, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Volume 177.
• Hassan Alimam, Giovanni Mazzuto, Nicola Tozzi, Filippo Emanuele Ciarapica, Maurizio Bevilacqua (2023), The resurrection of digital triplet: A cognitive pillar of human-machine integration at the dawn of industry 5.0, Journal of King Saud University—Computer and Information Sciences , Volume 35, Issue 10.
• Mariia Golovianko, VaganTerziyan, Vladyslav Branytskyi, Diana Malyk (2023), Industry 4.0 vs. Industry 5.0: Co-existence, Transition, or a Hybrid, Procedia Computer Science , Volume 217, pp. 102–113.
• Giovanni Francesco Massari, Raffaele Nacchiero, Ilaria Giannoccaro (2023), Digital technologies for resource loop redesign in circular supply chains: A systematic literature review, Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances , Volume 20.
• Yufei Zhong, Xuesheng Chen, Zhixian Wang, Regina Fang-Ying Lin (2024), The nexus among artificial intelligence, supply chain and energy sustainability: A time-varying analysis, Energy Economics , Volume 132.
• Martijn Koot, Martijn R.K. Mes, Maria E. Lacob (2021), A systematic literature review of supply chain decision making supported by the Internet of Things and Big Data Analytics, Computers & Industrial Engineering , Volume 154.
• SospeterOlewe, Melina Finke, Julia Belke, Florian Dyck, Christian Kürpick (2023), Use Case Catalog and Assessment for AI Applications in Intralogistics of Manufacturing Companies, Procedia CIRP , Volume 118, pp. 74–79.
• Raj, R., Kumar, V. & Verma, P. (2023), Big data analytics in mitigating challenges of sustainable manufacturing supply chain. Operations Management Research 16, pp. 1886–1900.
• Alsolbi, I., Shavaki, F.H., Agarwal, R. et al. (2023), Big data optimisation and management in supply chain management: A systematic literature review. Artificial Intelligence Review , (Suppl 1), pp. 253–284.
• Alahmadi, D.H., Jamjoom, A.A. (2022), Decision support system for handling control decisions and decision-maker related to supply chain. Journal of Big Data 9, 114.
• Akbari, M., Hopkins, J.L. (2022), Digital technologies as enablers of supply chain sustainability in an emerging economy. Operations Management Research 15, pp. 689–710.
• Durugbo, C.M., Al-Balushi, Z. (2023), Supply chain management in times of crisis: A systematic review. Management Review Quarterly 73, pp. 1179–1235.

• Darko, E.O.; Vlachos, I. Creating Valuable Relationships with Third-Party Logistics (3PL) Providers: A Multiple-Case Study. Logistics 2022 , 6 , 38. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• European Commission, Publication Office of European Union, Brussel. Industry 5.0. Towards a Sustainable, Humancentric and Resilient European Industry ; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2021; pp. 8–9. [ Google Scholar ]
• Machado, C.G.; Winroth, M.P.; Ribeiro da Silva, E.H.D. Sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0: Anemerging research agenda. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020 , 58 , 1462–1484. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sharma, R.; Shishodia, A.; Gunasekaran, A.; Min, H.; Munim, Z.H. The role of artificial intelligence in supply chain management: Mapping the territory. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2022 , 60 , 7527–7550. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jung, D.; Choi, Y. Systematic review of machine learning applications in mining: Exploration, exploitation, and reclamation. Minerals 2021 , 1 , 148. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Narkhede, P.; Walambe, R.; Mandaokar, S.; Chandel, P.; Kotecha, K.; Ghinea, G. Gas detection and identification using multimodal artificial intelligence based sensor fusion. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2021 , 4 , 3. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Diaz, R.; Ungoa, R.; Smithb, K.; Haghnegahdara, L.; Singha, B.; Phuonga, T. 5th International Conference on Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing Applications of AI /ML in Maritime Cyber Supply Chains. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2024 , 232 , 3247–3325. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, B.; Wu, Z.; Zhao, R. From Fiction to Fact: The Growing Role of Generative AI in Business and Finance. J. Chin. Econ. Bus. Stud. 2023 , 21 , 471–496. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Topuz, K.; Zengul, F.D.; Dag, A.; Almehmi, A.; Yildirim, M.B. Predicting graft survival among kidney transplant recipients: A Bayesian decision support model. Decis. Support. Syst. 2018 , 106 , 97–109. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gupta, S.; Modgil, S.; Choi, T.M.; Kumar, A.; Antony, J. Influences of artificial intelligence and blockchain technology on financial resilience of supply chains. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2023 , 261 , 108868. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Akram, M.W.; Akram, N.; Shahzad, F.; Rehman, K.U.; Andleeb, S. Blockchain technology in a crisis: Advantages, challenges, and lessons learned for enhancing food supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Clean. Prod. 2024 , 434 , 140034. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zechiel, F.; Blaurock, M.; Weber, E.; Büttgen, M.; Coussement, K. How tech companies advance sustainability through artificial intelligence: Developing and evaluating an AI x Sustainability strategy framework. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2024 , 119 , 75–89. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mehmood, M.U.; Chun, D.; Han, H.; Jeon, G.; Chen, K. A review of the applications of artificial intelligence and big data to buildings for energy-efficiency and a comfortable indoor living environment. Energy Build. 2019 , 202 , 109383. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021 , 372 , 71. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Patalas-Maliszewska, J.; Łosyk, H. Changes in Sustainable Development in Manufacturing in Cases of Unexpected Occurrences—A Systematic Review. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 717. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Moosavi, J.; Fathollahi-Fard, A.; Dulebenets, M. Supply chain disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic: Recognizing potential disruption management strategies. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022 , 75 , 102983. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Raj, A.; Mukherjee, A.; Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A.; Srivastava, S. Supply chain management during and post-COVID-19 pandemic: Mitigation strategies and practical lessons learned. J. Bus. Res. 2022 , 142 , 1125–1139. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kühner, C.; Stein, M.; Zacher, H. A person-environment fit approach to environmental sustainability in the workplace. J. Environ. Psychol. 2024 , 95 , 102270. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Li, F.; Xu, G. AI-driven customer relationship management for sustainable enterprise performance. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022 , 52 Pt B , 102103. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Barmer, H.; Dzombak, R.; Gaston, M.; Palat, V.; Redner, F.; Smith, C.; Smith, T. Human-Centered AI. SEI White Paper. 2021. Available online: https://kilthub.cmu.edu/articles/report/Human-Centered_AI/16560183/1?file=30632667 (accessed on 11 July 2024).
• Maternowska, M. Nowe technologie i ich wpływ Na łańcuchy dostaw. Sztuczna inteligencja. In Studia Ekonomiczne ; Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach: Katowice, Poland, 2019; Volume 388. [ Google Scholar ]
• Raman, R.; Sreenivasan, A.; Ma, S.; Patwardhan, A.; Nedungadi, P. Green Supply Chain Management Research Trends and Linkages to UN Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 15848. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Walter, S. Impacts of AI driven manufacturing processes on supply chains: The contributions of the knowledge project. Transp. Res. Procedia 2023 , 72 , 3443–3449, ISSN 2352-1465. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nikolakis, N.; Sipsas, K.; Makris, K. A cyber-physicalcontext-aware system for coordinating human-robot collaboration.51st CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems. Procedia CIRP 2018 , 72 , 27–32. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, L.; Gao, R.; Vancza, J.; Kruger, J.; Wang, X.V.; Makris, S.; Chryssolouris, G. Symbiotichuman-robot collaborative assembly. CIRP Ann. 2019 , 68 , 701–726. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Almusaed, A.; Yitmen, I.; Almssad, A. Reviewing and Integrating AEC Practices into Industry 6.0: Strategies for Smart and Sustainable Future-Built Environments. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 13464. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ivanov, D. Structural Dynamics and Resilience in Supply Chain Risk Management ; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ivanov, D. Two views of supply chain resilience. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2023 , 62 , 4031–4045. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ivanov, D.; Sokolov, B. Control and system-theoretic identification of the supply chain dynamics domain for planning, analysis and adaptation of performance under uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2013 , 224 , 313–323. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fabbe-Costes, N.; Ziad, Y. Improving Supply Chain Robustness & Resilience. Lessons from a case study in the automotive industry during the first wave of COVID-19. In Proceedings of the 28th EurOMA Conference, University of Sussex, Sussex, UK; Berlin, Germany, 5–7 July 2021. [ Google Scholar ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Patalas-Maliszewska, J.; Szmołda, M.; Łosyk, H. Integrating Artificial Intelligence into the Supply Chain in Order to Enhance Sustainable Production—A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 7110. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167110

Patalas-Maliszewska J, Szmołda M, Łosyk H. Integrating Artificial Intelligence into the Supply Chain in Order to Enhance Sustainable Production—A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability . 2024; 16(16):7110. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167110

Patalas-Maliszewska, Justyna, Małgorzata Szmołda, and Hanna Łosyk. 2024. "Integrating Artificial Intelligence into the Supply Chain in Order to Enhance Sustainable Production—A Systematic Literature Review" Sustainability 16, no. 16: 7110. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167110

Article Metrics

Supplementary material.

ZIP-Document (ZIP, 51 KiB)

Further Information

Mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

MIT researchers release a repository of AI risks

Which specific risks should a person, company or government consider when using an AI system, or crafting rules to govern its use? It’s not an easy question to answer. If it’s an AI with control over critical infrastructure, there’s the obvious risk to human safety. But what about an AI designed to score exams, sort resumes or verify travel documents at immigration control? Those each carry their own, categorically different risks, albeit risks no less severe.

In crafting laws to regulate AI, like the EU AI Act or California’s SB 1047 , policymakers have struggled to come to a consensus on which risks the laws should cover. To help provide a guidepost for them, as well as for stakeholders across the AI industry and academia, MIT researchers have developed what they’re calling an AI “risk repository” — a sort of database of AI risks.

“This is an attempt to rigorously curate and analyze AI risks into a publicly accessible, comprehensive, extensible and categorized risk database that anyone can copy and use, and that will be kept up to date over time,” Peter Slattery, a researcher at MIT’s FutureTech group and lead on the AI risk repository project, told TechCrunch. “We created it now because we needed it for our project, and had realized that many others needed it, too.”

Slattery says that the AI risk repository, which includes over 700 AI risks grouped by causal factors (e.g. intentionality), domains (e.g. discrimination) and subdomains (e.g. disinformation and cyberattacks), was born out of a desire to understand the overlaps and disconnects in AI safety research. Other risk frameworks exist. But they cover only a fraction of the risks identified in the repository, Slattery says, and these omissions could have major consequences for AI development, usage and policymaking.

“People may assume there is a consensus on AI risks, but our findings suggest otherwise,” Slattery added. “We found that the average frameworks mentioned just 34% of the 23 risk subdomains we identified, and nearly a quarter covered less than 20%. No document or overview mentioned all 23 risk subdomains, and the most comprehensive covered only 70%. When the literature is this fragmented, we shouldn’t assume that we are all on the same page about these risks.”

To build the repository, the MIT researchers worked with colleagues at the University of Queensland, the nonprofit Future of Life Institute, KU Leuven and AI startup Harmony Intelligence to scour academic databases and retrieve thousands of documents relating to AI risk evaluations.

The researchers found that the third-party frameworks they canvassed mentioned certain risks more often than others. For example, over 70% of the frameworks included the privacy and security implications of AI, whereas only 44% covered misinformation. And while over 50% discussed the forms of discrimination and misrepresentation that AI could perpetuate, only 12% talked about “pollution of the information ecosystem” — i.e. the increasing volume of AI-generated spam.

“A takeaway for researchers and policymakers, and anyone working with risks, is that this database could provide a foundation to build on when doing more specific work,” Slattery said. “Before this, people like us had two choices. They could invest significant time to review the scattered literature to develop a comprehensive overview, or they could use a limited number of existing frameworks, which might miss relevant risks. Now they have a more comprehensive database, so our repository will hopefully save time and increase oversight.”

But will anyone use it? It’s true that AI regulation around the world today is at best a hodgepodge: a spectrum of different approaches disunified in their goals. Had an AI risk repository like MIT’s existed before, would it have changed anything? Could it have? That’s tough to say.

Another fair question to ask is whether simply being aligned on the risks that AI poses is enough to spur moves toward competently regulating it. Many safety evaluations for AI systems have significant limitations , and a database of risks won’t necessarily solve that problem.

The MIT researchers plan to try, though. Neil Thompson, head of the FutureTech lab, tells TechCrunch that the group plans in its next phase of research to use the repository to evaluate how well different AI risks are being addressed.

“Our repository will help us in the next step of our research, when we will be evaluating how well different risks are being addressed,” Thompson said. “We plan to use this to identify shortcomings in organizational responses. For instance, if everyone focuses on one type of risk while overlooking others of similar importance, that’s something we should notice and address.

More TechCrunch

Get the industry’s biggest tech news, techcrunch daily news.

Every weekday and Sunday, you can get the best of TechCrunch’s coverage.

Startups Weekly

Startups are the core of TechCrunch, so get our best coverage delivered weekly.

TechCrunch Fintech

The latest Fintech news and analysis, delivered every Tuesday.

TechCrunch Mobility

TechCrunch Mobility is your destination for transportation news and insight.

From a $2.5 million hyper car to a Spanish track-ready EV, here were the most interesting EVs at Monterey Car Week

Historic vehicles, flowing champagne and fashion have dominated the events at Monterey Car Week for decades now. But a change is afoot: EVs, tech-centric vehicles, startups and a heavy dose…

5 days left to secure ticket savings for TechCrunch Disrupt 2024

The clock is ticking! You’ve got just 5 days left to lock in discounted tickets for TechCrunch Disrupt 2024. Save up to $600 on individual ticket types. This limited-time offer ends…

GM cuts 1,000 software jobs as it prioritizes quality and AI

General Motors is cutting around 1,000 software workers around the world in a bid to focus on more “high-priority” initiatives like improving its Super Cruise driver assistance system, the quality…

Procreate takes a stand against generative AI, vows to never incorporate the tech into its products

Popular iPad design app Procreate is coming out against generative AI, and has vowed never to introduce generative AI features into its products. The company said on its website that…

Mike Lynch, recently acquitted in HP-Autonomy fraud case, is missing after yacht capsized off Sicily

Mike Lynch, the investor and high-profile founder of U.K. tech firm Autonomy, has been declared missing at sea after the yacht he was on, the Bayesian, capsized in a storm…

ElevenLabs’ text-to-speech app Reader is now available globally

ElevenLabs, which develops AI-powered tools to create and edit synthetic voices, is making its Reader app available globally with support for 32 languages.

AMD to acquire infrastructure player ZT Systems for $4.9B to amp up its AI ecosystem play

AMD is acquiring ZT Systems, which provides compute design and infrastructure for AI, cloud and general purpose computing, for $4.9 billion.

Amazon considers moving Amazon Pay into a standalone app in India

Amazon is considering shifting its payments offerings in India into a standalone app, three sources familiar with the matter told TechCrunch, as the e-commerce giant aims to boost usage of…

As CO 2 emissions from supply chains come into focus, this startup is aiming at farms

Root helps food and beverage companies collect primary data on their agricultural supply chains. 

Waza comes out of stealth with $8M to power global trade for African businesses

In May, the African fintech processed up to $70 million in monthly payment volume.

Digitally resurrecting actors is still a terrible idea

This post contains spoilers for the movie “Alien: Romulus” In the long-running “Alien” movie franchise, the Weyland-Yutani Corporation can’t seem to let go of a terrible idea: It keeps trying…

With the Polestar 3 now ‘weeks’ away, its CEO looks to make company ‘self-sustaining’

Thomas Ingenlath is having perhaps a little too much fun in his Polestar 3, silently rocketing away from stop signs and swinging through tightening bends, grinning like a man far…

South Korea’s AI textbook program faces skepticism from parents

Some parents have reservations about the South Korean government’s plans to bring tablets with AI-powered textbooks into classrooms, according to a report in The Financial Times. The tablets are scheduled…

Featured Article

How VC Pippa Lamb ended up on ‘Industry’ — one of the hottest shows on TV

Season 3 of “Industry” focuses on the fictional bank Pierpoint blends the worlds — and drama — of tech, media, government, and finance.

Selling a startup in an ‘acqui-hire’ is more lucrative than it seems, founders and VCs say

Selling under such circumstances is often not as poor of an outcome for founders and key staff as it initially seems. 

These fintech companies are hiring, despite a rough market in 2024

While the rapid pace of funding has slowed, many fintechs are continuing to see growth and expand their teams.

Rippling’s Parker Conrad says founders should ‘go all the way to the ground’ to run their companies

This is just one area of leadership where Parker Conrad takes a contrarian approach. He also said he doesn’t believe in top-down management.

Nancy Pelosi criticizes California AI bill as ‘ill-informed’

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi issued a statement late yesterday laying out her opposition to SB 1047, a California bill that seeks to regulate AI. “The view of many of us in…

Palantir CEO Alex Karp is ‘not going to apologize’ for military work

Data analytics company Palantir has faced criticism and even protests over its work with the military, police, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, but co-founder and CEO Alex Karp isn’t…

Why Porsche NA CEO Timo Resch is betting on ‘choice’ to survive the turbulent EV market

Timo Resch is basking in the sun. That’s literally true, as we speak on a gloriously clear California day at the Quail, one of Monterey Car Week’s most prestigious events.…

Google takes on OpenAI with Gemini Live

Made by Google was this week, featuring a full range of reveals from Google’s biggest hardware event. Google unveiled its new lineup of Pixel 9 phones, including the $1,799 Pixel…

OpenAI’s new voice mode let me talk with my phone, not to it

I’ve been playing around with OpenAI’s Advanced Voice Mode for the last week, and it’s the most convincing taste I’ve had of an AI-powered future yet. This week, my phone…

X says it’s closing operations in Brazil

X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, said today that it’s ending operations in Brazil, although the service will remain available to users in the country. The announcement…

Ikea expands its inventory drone fleet

One of the biggest questions looming over the drone space is how to best use the tech. Inspection has become a key driver, as the autonomous copters are deployed to…

Keychain aims to unlock a new approach to manufacturing consumer goods

Brands can use Keychain to look up different products and see who actually manufactures them.

Microsoft Copilot: Everything you need to know about Microsoft’s AI

In this post, we explain the many Microsoft Copilots available and what they do, and highlight the key differences between each.

How the ransomware attack at Change Healthcare went down: A timeline

A hack on UnitedHealth-owned tech giant Change Healthcare likely stands as one of the biggest data breaches of U.S. medical data in history.

Gogoro delays India plans due to policy uncertainty, launches bike-taxi pilot with Rapido

Gogoro has deferred its India plans over delay in government incentives, but the Taiwanese company has partnered with Rapido for a bike-taxi pilot.

a16z offers social media tips after its founder’s ‘attack’ tweet goes viral

On Friday, the venture firm Andreessen Horowitz tweeted out a link to its guide on how to “build your social media presence” which features advice for founders.

OpenAI shuts down election influence operation that used ChatGPT

OpenAI has banned a cluster of ChatGPT accounts linked to an Iranian influence operation that was generating content about the U.S. presidential election, according to a blog post on Friday.…